5 Wind Turbines Which Failed (Environmentally Friendly?)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 лис 2016
  • Nearly 120 wind turbines catch fire each year, according to a research - ten times the number reported by the industry. The researchers claim that out of 200,000 turbines around the world, 117 fires take place annually - far more than what is reported by wind farm companies.
    Fire has a huge financial impact on the industry; Each windmill costs more than £2 million and generates an estimated income of more than £500,000 per year. Any loss or downtime of these valuable assets makes the industry less viable and productive.
    Fires are a problem for the industry, impacting on energy production, economic output and emitting toxic fumes, this could cast a shadow over the industry’s green credentials. Wind turbines catch fire because highly flammable materials such as hydraulic oil and plastics are in close proximity to machinery and electrical wires. These can ignite a fire if they overheat or are faulty. Lots of oxygen, in the form of high winds, can quickly fan a fire inside a turbine.
    Join 'Engineering World' like many others to get access to very special perks:
    / @engineeringworld.
    Also, kindly consider subscribing to our channel if you liked the video: geni.us/SubscribeChannel
    Watch some of our other interesting videos:
    Are Wind Turbines really Environmentally Friendly?
    Link: • 5 Wind Turbines Which ...
    Which is the best seaplane ever made?
    Link: • Top 7 Seaplanes from A...
    Can SpaceX rockets really land from the space?
    Link: • 5 AMAZING SpaceX Rocke...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 8 тис.

  • @nopenope5203
    @nopenope5203 5 років тому +1190

    "are they environmentally friendly"? Really? Just because of a few high profile accidents this video questions the environmental safety of harvesting the energy of the wind?

    • @paugasolina5048
      @paugasolina5048 5 років тому +19

      i am friendly to u mom

    • @xjunkxyrdxdog89
      @xjunkxyrdxdog89 5 років тому +135

      _If they suck up all the wind we'll all run out of fresh air._

    • @reahs4815
      @reahs4815 5 років тому +28

      Hmmmmmmmmmm Kinda sounds like the argument vs nuclear power

    • @nopenope5203
      @nopenope5203 5 років тому +29

      @@reahs4815 it may sound similar but they are on completely different scales. A windmill as far as I know is always built in an isolated area to have most efficient access to wind power and only requires occasional maintenance so it is normally unmanned. If it started collapsing or exploding, it is extremely unlikely to affect anyone other then normal inconveniences such an accident would entail.
      Having a catastrophic failure at a nuclear power plant would be exponentially more dangerous in comparison. The dedicated workforce normally in attendence at the factory would obviously be put at risk, but nearby buildings and facilities along with their occupants would be in just as much danger since the potential hazards are devastating.
      Comparing the failure of a windmill to a nuclear power plant is like comparing a small car accident to a large passenger train derailment. One is simple and unlikely to hurt more then the people involved. The other could easily seriously maim or kill everyone in the immediate vicinity.

    • @reahs4815
      @reahs4815 5 років тому +33

      @@nopenope5203 But the problem is that people still think nuclear power plants are built exactly like those 50 years ago which is not the case.
      If a modern nuclear plant would fail the worst thing that could happen would be that they had to restart the reactor.
      That's why we should encourage usage of nuclear so we can make nuclear better, more efficient and cheaper to build and maintain but also most importantly rebuild/demolish/upgrade old reactors that do not fulfill modern safety standards.
      I'm not saying that we should stop using wind or solar but we should not get rid of nuclear power or have less of it because the masses of misinformed people think they are nukes in fancy houses. If we get rid of nuclear what will replace it? Wind? solar? HA! they will never be able to reliably replace nuclear as long as we don't have a safe, economically viable, efficient and good way to store excess power during low demand and use the stored energy during high demand

  • @Anglo-Saxon9
    @Anglo-Saxon9 7 років тому +444

    These are wind turbines, not windmills.

    • @47485ksc
      @47485ksc 7 років тому +1

      It's "Pat & Terry's". I've been there. Good looking chicks, too. They just don't "polish knobs".

    • @Anglo-Saxon9
      @Anglo-Saxon9 7 років тому +1

      The fuck?

    • @47485ksc
      @47485ksc 7 років тому +1

      See, "Pat" and "Terry" can be either a man or woman's name. Never seen the comedy: "It's Pat!" movie I take it..? You should have known.

    • @blogengeezer4507
      @blogengeezer4507 7 років тому +1

      As you mentioned, hand built 'Wind' Powered 'Mills' were actually cost effective and labor saving, grinding far more grain than possible by human hands. Wind electric energy generating Turbines should be so lucky.
      Without the original Wind powered 'Lift' devices to pump out the polders before electrical turbine pumps, Holland would still be under water along it's coastal areas.

    • @47485ksc
      @47485ksc 7 років тому +1

      Without those pumps, water pipes would be big sellers, eh?

  • @TheA10Phonex
    @TheA10Phonex 5 років тому +752

    Anything mechanical is prone to failure... except for 1996 Toyota Camrys.

    • @Manice08
      @Manice08 5 років тому +11

      my 99 frame rusted in half before i had any major failures internal failures lol

    • @Justinvanjamz
      @Justinvanjamz 5 років тому +3

      @@Manice08 i totalled mine....but it still ran good lol

    • @Justinvanjamz
      @Justinvanjamz 5 років тому +5

      yes!! you cant kill the 90s model camrys

    • @gaylordsteambag_389
      @gaylordsteambag_389 5 років тому +8

      Or 3310 nokias

    • @militiachusetts5534
      @militiachusetts5534 5 років тому +1

      300k miles...only thing I ever had to fix was the snapped axle I did in a snow bank and my alternator.

  • @blessed465
    @blessed465 4 роки тому +24

    Camera man: records
    *something happens*
    *Immediately points camera at the ground*
    👌🏿

  • @Tradcast
    @Tradcast 7 років тому +120

    2:16 someone installed wind turbines on Windows xp. It failed miserably

    • @PenisMcWhirtar
      @PenisMcWhirtar 7 років тому +3

      NO you IDIOT! It was t'other way round - stuxnet did the rest!!!!

    • @tacticalfacepalm5403
      @tacticalfacepalm5403 7 років тому +5

      Tradcast Someone installed an Apple Mac OS into that turbine.

    • @lythsian
      @lythsian 7 років тому +4

      don't you mean it crashed?

    • @theRPGmaster
      @theRPGmaster 7 років тому +2

      Blue screened

    • @zacharycauchi7253
      @zacharycauchi7253 6 років тому

      Windows XP is not enough, it needs Protegent.

  • @cerealru1069
    @cerealru1069 7 років тому +334

    the first one was a demolition.

    • @WJRHalyn-jw2ho
      @WJRHalyn-jw2ho 6 років тому +5

      Yup. Everyone seemed pretty chill about it, even mimicking the honking warning horn.
      FACE PLANT!

    • @icefozzy8461
      @icefozzy8461 6 років тому +2

      U meaned second

    • @WJRHalyn-jw2ho
      @WJRHalyn-jw2ho 6 років тому +2

      Well, the one labelled #5, anyway. Seems they had a short clip showing it working, then Boom! Down it comes. (I'm not including the damage being done in the title clip prior to that... #5 was the first of the series of 5 reviews.)

    • @S730SD
      @S730SD 6 років тому +4

      It's unfortunate they haven't all been demolished yet. :)

    • @Enzi_Meteori_902
      @Enzi_Meteori_902 5 років тому

      It definitely looked like a freakin simulated demolition! How can one lightning strike kill a windmill? I mean, it can but it can't make it fall over, so I take it as a yes that it was a simulated demolition

  • @papapalpatine8513
    @papapalpatine8513 5 років тому +115

    1:37 how to power the whole city with one turbine

  • @markfethke6150
    @markfethke6150 4 роки тому +23

    Anyone ever hit a bird with their car? If so you better park it.

  • @mottthehoople693
    @mottthehoople693 6 років тому +162

    mechanical things fail all the time...shit happens..

    • @MattQrillz
      @MattQrillz 6 років тому +11

      (Psst, common sense isn't very common anymore. Please be mindful of flat earth retards)

    • @randhirkumar3721
      @randhirkumar3721 6 років тому

      Mott theHoople cat

    • @TheValentineEnemy
      @TheValentineEnemy 6 років тому

      Exactly. We cannot create perfect things after all...

    • @keyeramcewen8659
      @keyeramcewen8659 6 років тому

      Forest gump reference

    • @wkdravenna
      @wkdravenna 6 років тому

      forrest who's named after Nathaniel Bedford Forrest ? Literally the founder of the KKK. Come on don't bring that democrat stuff around here.

  • @darkspyro8978
    @darkspyro8978 5 років тому +371

    The First one wasn't a failure it was a contorlled destruction!

    • @everettrailfan
      @everettrailfan 5 років тому +17

      I know right! That first one was obviously not a failure! It was _entirely_ a controlled demolition!

    • @rnqtn
      @rnqtn 5 років тому +10

      Yeah, it was not a failure. It was a completely controlled dismantling!

    • @streax8967
      @streax8967 5 років тому +6

      Indeed! It clearly wasn’t a failure. But rather a controlled wrecking.

    • @015AEX
      @015AEX 5 років тому +3

      Here I will explain all of them 5 you said that one 4 dumbass bird not being smart at all I’m pretty sure if my dog knows not to to jump into the pool in my backyard the bird should know not to go there 3 again old and it was probably rusty 2 Mother Nature 1 show me the full clip please

    • @MegaJimbob125
      @MegaJimbob125 5 років тому +7

      Absolutely the first one was without a doubt a controlled destruction

  • @damnallseperatist
    @damnallseperatist 4 роки тому +120

    "(Enviromental friendly?)" What are you exactly critical of here?
    How do you think this compare to... when a oil field catches on fire? or a when a tanker sinks and leaks billions of gallons of crude into open sea?
    oh my boy

    • @RonP51
      @RonP51 4 роки тому +8

      These things are being put in the path of bird migration patterns they do not produce enough electricity to run big cities

    • @damnallseperatist
      @damnallseperatist 4 роки тому +8

      ​@@RonP51 no they are not. and even if they do kill a dozen birds a year, coal plants however, kill millions (of human beings, not to mention wildlife) every year via air pollution.
      the trade off is crystal clear.

    • @Penguin_of_Death
      @Penguin_of_Death 4 роки тому +5

      Can you please enlighten us when ANY TANKER EVER leaked 'billions of gallons of crude' into the sea then
      Oh...I though not. Stop exaggerating to make your point

    • @TheXanderGrim
      @TheXanderGrim 4 роки тому +1

      @Exinety Icxee Actually you are , there is no taker that carries over 312,000MT

    • @TheXanderGrim
      @TheXanderGrim 4 роки тому

      @Exinety Icxee Why respond then ....... Why the need for profanity , does one not have an verbose vocabulary from which to draw ?

  • @mnlepaw336lab7
    @mnlepaw336lab7 4 роки тому +4

    1:51 this is my favorite one because it went so fast. That made me laugh

  • @mayhemmike1789
    @mayhemmike1789 7 років тому +166

    lack of proper maintenance is normally the cause of failure

    • @TIMEtoRIDE900
      @TIMEtoRIDE900 7 років тому +15

      Lack of failure (reliability) is normally caused by proper maintenance.

    • @waska61
      @waska61 7 років тому

      Michael Gillette

    • @gabrielgarza3707
      @gabrielgarza3707 7 років тому

      Michael Gillette. people don't take care there stuff

    • @MikeBarbarossa
      @MikeBarbarossa 7 років тому +1

      Looks like those last 2 had failed brakes. You have to be able to lock those down in too high winds

    • @dansmolen1618
      @dansmolen1618 7 років тому

      Michael Gillette no truer words ever spoken! keeps farm silo crews employed to this day!

  • @strategosgaming8230
    @strategosgaming8230 6 років тому +1335

    Oh look, I can almost see the oil spill that these windmills didn't create.

    • @DanYHKim2
      @DanYHKim2 6 років тому +47

      You can see all of the people being evacuated from the nearby community, right?
      yeah, no.

    • @realtree7342
      @realtree7342 6 років тому +19

      They contain hundreds of gallons of motor what do you think is burning

    • @DanYHKim2
      @DanYHKim2 6 років тому +52

      Wow. 'Hundreds' of gallons?
      Off of China, there is a single tanker that had a collision and fire. According to the BBC, it was "carrying 136,000 tonnes of ultra-light crude oil from Iran which generates a toxic underwater slick that would be invisible from the surface."
      There is no comparison. Hundreds of gallons of oil or other fuel may be what a container ship (not a tanker, which holds much more) leaks inadvertently in the course of a week of operation. In 2012, a small cargo ship was described to have a 'minor' leak of 1500 gallons. A single oil tank car, the kind that have been derailing and exploding in past years, can hold over 34,000 gallons.

    • @realtree7342
      @realtree7342 6 років тому +9

      Fuskisima still has stopped pouring radio active water in to the pacific i take a bath in petrol over cesium anyday

    • @samkoch2857
      @samkoch2857 6 років тому +4

      Strategos Gaming actually the windmills by my house are leaking oil onto the fields

  • @madsvigan2898
    @madsvigan2898 4 роки тому +12

    I only clicked here because of "
    Enviromental friendly?" sounds like making the argument that nuclear power isnt as good as coal, becuase theres been 3 large meltdown since we build nuclear reactors

  • @lean737
    @lean737 5 років тому +1

    Friday:arrives
    Me: 0:28

  • @blazedr13
    @blazedr13 6 років тому +682

    We should quit planting trees because they might catch on fire someday.

    • @heinz490
      @heinz490 6 років тому +30

      or fall down in a storm and kill a person

    • @jaganbharadwaj1143
      @jaganbharadwaj1143 6 років тому +3

      And you will inhale only co2 n live rest of your life😂

    • @jaganbharadwaj1143
      @jaganbharadwaj1143 6 років тому +1

      @I Am Sekouu surely will 😀😀

    • @farhan6057
      @farhan6057 6 років тому +5

      Dumbest comment ever lmao!

    • @quarans08
      @quarans08 6 років тому +3

      Munji nescafe r/whoooosh

  • @aurctic6046
    @aurctic6046 7 років тому +74

    1:36, I don't think wind turbines are meant to turn into sonic.

    • @maalsy
      @maalsy 7 років тому +12

      Aurctic it went crazy bc the brakes weren't working right. I know that bc I build wind farms and wind turbines

    • @neurofiedyamato8763
      @neurofiedyamato8763 7 років тому +4

      The brakes most likely failed

    • @danielstark8258
      @danielstark8258 6 років тому +1

      carter masters if you worked at a wind farm you’d know that the blades also turn to prevent that from happening... it probably got hit by lightning and shorted a fuse causing the safety features to shut down

    • @mrono1910
      @mrono1910 6 років тому

      Yea the gear reduction system probably ran out of oil or something and failed to turn the speed down

    • @clankplusm
      @clankplusm 6 років тому

      daniel PC/ Xbox its called feathering, propeller planes do it too

  • @Lolero
    @Lolero 4 роки тому +1

    Bird: flying noises
    Windmill: BEGONE

  • @ursulasmith6402
    @ursulasmith6402 3 роки тому +1

    Turbins: " All we are is junk in the wind.....". Junk in the wind all we are is junk in the wind... oh oh oh, lol

  • @Salguine
    @Salguine 6 років тому +715

    This ad brought to you by the oil and coal industry.

    • @scottday1988
      @scottday1988 5 років тому +7

      Salguine the true power you can make oil disappear. Stop wearing shoes buying tires boats wiring

    • @micha8469
      @micha8469 5 років тому +11

      Exactly my thoughts xD Like windmills should be 100% reliable while everything in the industry fails sometimes, even things built using way older and well-rounded technologies... When it comes to windmills, they don't really have anything toxic inside to harm the environment. Just some garbage to collect, bring new parts and you're good to go. Things break, nothing new. In comparison to the amount of them all over the world, I'm sure we can call windmills pretty reliable. Prepaid propaganda video, nothing else.

    • @Salguine
      @Salguine 5 років тому +1

      You wanna go sober up and try that sentence again?

    • @nunyab8972
      @nunyab8972 5 років тому +1

      No. This ad brought to you by an internet troll, and you took the bait.

    • @ApolloTheDerg
      @ApolloTheDerg 5 років тому

      Hydro Solar Nuclear*

  • @Earthneedsado-over177
    @Earthneedsado-over177 6 років тому +240

    Ever see an oil well fire? These are sparklers by comparison.

    • @rickyspanish7851
      @rickyspanish7851 6 років тому +7

      yeah, these are better for the enviroment. things malfunction once in a while

    • @marshthefox6668
      @marshthefox6668 6 років тому +2

      I was about to say, at least these don't spill toxic fumes and radiation.

    • @falseprogress
      @falseprogress 6 років тому

      Wind turbines are polluting a lot more scenery than the fossil fuel business now, and are a menace to anything that flies, especially bats. I'm not a fracking apologist but that infrastructure is much smaller and sites can at least be restored when the oil or gas plays out. Wind turbines are meant to loom over landscapes indefinitely, including red-lit night skies, and it's no simple matter to take them down once they're up. cutt.us/blight_for_naught

    • @wako1576
      @wako1576 6 років тому +3

      Respect Silence
      when you said polluting, I assumed you were talking about poisoning the natural world in some way, but that link is just about how wind turbines look ugly. Do they actually have a significant negative environmental impact, or is this really just about them feeling intrusive in landscapes?

    • @georgedang449
      @georgedang449 6 років тому +6

      A sleek white windmill looks a lot better than a black oil well tower that spews orange flame and dark plume once in a while when overflow valve opens.

  • @murrayelliott6828
    @murrayelliott6828 4 роки тому +2

    Top flight German turbine maker, Siemens booked a €223 million write down (ie loss) in 2014 due to the fact it had to replace bearings in a fleet of turbines that were less than 2 years old.

  • @curtnicholson7771
    @curtnicholson7771 5 років тому

    So I'd really like to know if the base on the first one was poured to shallow as I see it pulled it right out of the ground as it toppled over!

  • @MrBarrynicholas
    @MrBarrynicholas 7 років тому +182

    Amazing that the title reads windmills and not wind turbines.

    • @kkknotcool
      @kkknotcool 7 років тому +7

      "a machine for producing continuous power in which a wheel or rotor, typically fitted with vanes, is made to revolve by a fast-moving flow of water, steam, gas, air, or other fluid."
      I don't know if you have been around wind "Turbines" much but they are not continuous. They always seem to be shutting down because the wind is to slow or the wind is to fast or they just feel like it for all I know.

    • @MrOpenGL
      @MrOpenGL 7 років тому +2

      Be aware that "continuous" in that context means that (as long as there is wind) the power output is constant, unlike a petrol/diesel or steam engine that has some moments where the engine is coasting (not producing any power or consuming power to compress air) and the load runs off the flywheel.
      It isn't related to the fact they aren't able to run because there isn't enough wind.

    • @BoksCar29
      @BoksCar29 7 років тому +5

      Aint it the truth. It cranks me up when I drive by these wind generating farms and see how many blades are not turning knowing that my tax money is subsidizing those non-turning tax drains.. The owners make money no matter if the blades are turning or not.

    • @jmgraydz
      @jmgraydz 7 років тому +2

      you are kidding right. you are why this country is failing

    • @janetgriffiths7200
      @janetgriffiths7200 7 років тому

      Solar is better. That's what we have.

  • @johnthaller9501
    @johnthaller9501 6 років тому +54

    The Centralia Pa. coal mine fire has been burning since 1962, with no way to put it out. It may burn for hundreds of years. I'll take a few minor wind turbine fires instead.

    • @Bluehealer100
      @Bluehealer100 6 років тому +1

      This is the original setting for the movie Silent Hill, Centrailia Penn.

    • @ericzuller5348
      @ericzuller5348 6 років тому +2

      It's been continually burning for nearly 60 years... Where do you figure 3-5 years it will be out? There is a coal seam fire in Australia that has been burning for an estimated 6000 years. The Centralia fire will continue to burn for a long, long time.

    • @johnthaller9501
      @johnthaller9501 6 років тому +1

      Why would it run out of air? I has been burning for years with enough air to keep it going for 60 years.

    • @WimsicleStranger
      @WimsicleStranger 6 років тому +1

      John Thaller there’s more than 60 years worth of oxygen on this planet...

    • @jamebrooke894
      @jamebrooke894 6 років тому

      John Thaller Like that response! But as I was told by a nice liberal lady with a very foul mouth"facts are racist".

  • @ngkirby9523
    @ngkirby9523 4 роки тому

    Number 5 : it face plants...
    My lil bro watches
    He : face plants

  •  4 роки тому

    At 1:23.. " ahhh yo yo yoooo yohh tissss shhhh " 😂😂😂

  • @anonymousanonymous9991
    @anonymousanonymous9991 5 років тому +391

    You all actually questioning whether this is more environmentally friendly than fossil fuels? Taking this so seriously is messin wit ma vibe I'm just tryna watch windmills tear itself apart 🤣🤣🤣

    • @anonymousanonymous9991
      @anonymousanonymous9991 5 років тому +28

      @Sharkzer My grammar is bad intentionally; it's fun and funny. Yours? I cant imagine someone uses intentionally bad grammar to correct another's grammar. "Write english" ? English is an idea, one being self referential. You dont write English: you write in English. Can I not just make a comment for fun while I'm high?

    • @bobbobbly3753
      @bobbobbly3753 5 років тому +10

      😂 Yuh get nerded @skarkzer

    • @DancesWithSloth
      @DancesWithSloth 5 років тому +8

      @Sharkzer ...What? dude that was straight gibberish

    • @nothing-xu8ef
      @nothing-xu8ef 5 років тому +7

      Danceswithsloths ma nigga one of them internet trolls. thirst’n 💦 for sum attention, ain’t UA-cam without em

    • @gosaelius8135
      @gosaelius8135 5 років тому

      @Sharkzer jummijammi emppu :D

  • @TeaDog14
    @TeaDog14 5 років тому +607

    *Windmill accidentally kills 1 bird* "IS THIS ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY" *Oil spill happens killing thousands possibly millions of living organisms* "Hey man, it happens"

    • @TheXanderGrim
      @TheXanderGrim 5 років тому +10

      you do realize Oil is a natural substance right ......

    • @TeaDog14
      @TeaDog14 5 років тому +54

      @@TheXanderGrim I never claimed it wasn't? Oil spills kill thousand of birds, turtles, otters etc. and that's a fact. Oil being used for gas causes co2 pollution which will eventually melt the poles killing every animal up there as well. It will also cause sea levels to rise which will end up causing many humans to die as well for various reasons. It being a natural substance doesn't make it environmentally friendly lol.

    • @aslerunarborgersen5175
      @aslerunarborgersen5175 5 років тому +17

      Windmills kill thousand of big birds every year. Especially eagles and owls, plus bats. Windmills are not eco friendly at all. In average they just produce 1/3 of their capacity due to unstable wind conditions.

    • @davidknez98
      @davidknez98 5 років тому +24

      @@TheXanderGrim loool yes, uranium/mercury/cyanide etc. are also a natural substances but you would't want to have them in your drinking water would you

    • @FadedHeroFound
      @FadedHeroFound 5 років тому

      Leaky pipes aren't tho

  • @ericcaves7530
    @ericcaves7530 4 роки тому +4

    I can't imagine how much power #4 was producing before it broke

  • @Bullrino_GojiYT
    @Bullrino_GojiYT 2 роки тому

    0:40
    bird:going to the MOOOOOON
    windmill:GOING TO HELLLLLLLLL

  • @johnnymiller1722
    @johnnymiller1722 7 років тому +506

    Why do cars fail? Are they unreliable? Are they safe for the environment?
    Post your answers down below in the comments section!

    • @petersmythe6462
      @petersmythe6462 6 років тому +15

      1. They're complex machines with unbelievable stresses on various parts.
      2. Yes.
      3. No.

    • @MySandClock
      @MySandClock 6 років тому +41

      lol, did you not understand his irony? really?

    • @familysizebagofchips3612
      @familysizebagofchips3612 6 років тому +3

      Peter literally bikes to work wherever he goes lol

    • @iamisro6636
      @iamisro6636 6 років тому +2

      when someone tells you 300 story and you suddenly ask, oh so this is how romeo met juliet . Wake up dumbo.

    • @surenkushwah8763
      @surenkushwah8763 6 років тому

      Johnny Miller राम राम

  • @jamiebales8394
    @jamiebales8394 7 років тому +313

    Funny looking windmills.. Where do you get the flour?

    • @benconway9010
      @benconway9010 7 років тому +2

      Jamie Bales lol

    • @47485ksc
      @47485ksc 7 років тому +9

      Uh, WalMart, aisle 12? You should have known.

    • @moondog3040
      @moondog3040 7 років тому

      from the birds the blades mash up ......"MAN...it is tuff to be a bird"....look it up..funny Disney cartoon

    • @dansmolen1618
      @dansmolen1618 7 років тому

      Yamaha SR650 are the maxi pads for tt500 dirtbikers right next to that,or one aisle over?

    • @jamiebales8394
      @jamiebales8394 7 років тому

      Shots fired.

  • @shawty5359
    @shawty5359 4 роки тому

    When it said:Why does a windmill fail after all?”I was like:Because it saw yo mama

  • @savagediamonds1120
    @savagediamonds1120 4 роки тому

    Imagine driving by and seeing one these things break off and start flying

  • @RnR5
    @RnR5 7 років тому +70

    0:42 Clearly the bird is Suicidal

    • @wcanaday234
      @wcanaday234 6 років тому

      They seem to be drawn to them. Bird kill is a serious issue. I think they can't figure out what they are, but, since they are in their territory, are looking for a way to chase them away.

    • @owenprince4823
      @owenprince4823 6 років тому +5

      The birds are drawn to the tall wind turbines because they are very tall and the birds think it would be a good place for a nest to be safe from critters on the ground. There is turbulence around the blades that create a vortex that pull the bird into the blade so it may seem like a dumb bird but the nesting is the bait and the blade it the death trap. I have a design that gives them a place to nest on top with no danger of getting hit by a blade.

    • @RnR5
      @RnR5 6 років тому

      What is that Design ? :O

    • @rpotter6147
      @rpotter6147 6 років тому +1

      So are people that support this hideous scar on the land. If you really think this is the way to save the earth from our energy addiction dream on.

    • @owenprince4823
      @owenprince4823 6 років тому +2

      There is a way to save the earth from peoples energy addiction. Remove all people from the planet :)

  • @DJGaetz
    @DJGaetz 5 років тому +201

    From a channel called engineering world... lmfao

    • @Starnas
      @Starnas 4 роки тому

      Bro his channel literally says "ew"

    • @Scrod117
      @Scrod117 3 роки тому +4

      WIND TURBINE FAILURES:
      1: Struck by lightening
      2. A bid got hit by one of the blades (Only one that was the fault of the turbine)
      3: An old, outdated design of a turbine collapsed
      4: Someone forgot to turn one off during a storm
      5: Same as #4, someone forgot to shut one down during high wind speeds
      Yup, all of these were definitely the fault of the wind turbine.

  • @Henriburger1
    @Henriburger1 4 роки тому +3

    1:37
    I wanna know how many MegaWatts that thing was generating before it exploded.

  • @rencrab7265
    @rencrab7265 4 роки тому

    0:26 In a way it just makes me laugh because of the way it just face plants lmao.

    • @callie313
      @callie313 4 роки тому

      Rencrab TIIIMBERRRR

  • @martinallenuk
    @martinallenuk 5 років тому +1120

    Now let's take a look at what happens when a nuclear power plant fails...

    • @_Mitchell_YT
      @_Mitchell_YT 5 років тому +9

      hahahahhaa

    • @rorye4963
      @rorye4963 5 років тому +56

      Well that took about 2 minutes. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_and_radiation_accidents_by_death_toll#List_of_accidents
      Coal at 15,000 deaths per trillion kWhrs produced, while nuclear is the least at zero. Wind energy kills a mere 100 people or so, the majority from falls during maintenance activities.
      In England, there were 163 wind turbine accidents that killed 14 people in 2011. Wind produced about 15 billion kWhrs that year, so using a capacity factor of 25%, that translates to about 1,000 deaths per trillion kWhrs produced (the world produces 15 trillion kWhrs per year from all sources). - from www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2013/09/29/forget-eagle-deaths-wind-turbines-kill-humans/
      So unless you care more about dirt than you do your fellow man you are wrong.

    • @elmariotti934
      @elmariotti934 5 років тому +41

      So, after all the statistics ... i would still prefer the windmill crashing to a nuclear power plant fail ... just my 2 cents

    • @rorye4963
      @rorye4963 5 років тому +17

      @@elmariotti934 You should look up Chernobyl, it wasnt very deadly compared to the good it had done, that is why i say if you choose wind you care more about dirt than human life. If your take is you care more about the environment it would be a better arguement.

    • @leroibolos4679
      @leroibolos4679 5 років тому +28

      Chernobyl is still a no go area for humans. There were also large cancer clusters where the radiactive cloud passed by - My wifes family lives in one the areas so I have personal experience. Choosing dirt over wind No entiendo?!

  • @eugenelevin5381
    @eugenelevin5381 6 років тому +48

    Number 5 didn't fall collapse on accident it was on intentional because they were removing it.

    • @_Braised
      @_Braised 6 років тому +6

      4 wasn't a fail either- the turbine was performing as intended, and 2 was done intentionally to determine the turbine's maximum stress limit.

    • @nigelmitchell351
      @nigelmitchell351 6 років тому

      Eugene Levin , why ?

    • @jeppehede5883
      @jeppehede5883 6 років тому

      Number 2 was not intentional it happend under a storm in Denmark where the brakes failed

  • @zeframrinehart
    @zeframrinehart 4 роки тому +23

    Love how the first clip was a turbine functioning exactly as intended and redirecting lightning through the lightning rods built into the blades. yet it's on a list of "failures". Do your research, the entire thing is rigged with built in, engineered lightning rods and is all grounded. And the second clip is unfortunate but does not happen very often. I work oil field and am around those turbines often and not once have I seen any dead birds killed by them. I know its true predators could have gotten to the birds after hitting the ground.

    • @paullee7467
      @paullee7467 4 роки тому +3

      Jacob Blain bird kept flying around it too, birds fault, looked like he was committing suicide.

    • @splunkr24
      @splunkr24 2 роки тому

      @@paullee7467 Yes, it is the bird's fault. Because it fully understands all the engineering, math, and angular velocities involved in a wind turbine.

  • @naviddavanikabir
    @naviddavanikabir 4 роки тому

    what happened at @1:50?
    I guess it was overspeeding, but what did it led to?

    • @naviddavanikabir
      @naviddavanikabir 4 роки тому

      I just watched the slow motion. looks like one of the blades failed, then an unbalance occurred, and another blade hit the body.

  • @blackturbine
    @blackturbine 7 років тому +77

    well wind turbine goes up in flames mostly because of hydraulic failure it cannot control blades pitch any more, starts to spin to fast generator and gearbox overheat ant then fire lot of it

    • @engineeringworld.
      @engineeringworld.  7 років тому +4

      Thank you for your valuable input it was indeed informative.

    • @kawasakiwhiptwo5821
      @kawasakiwhiptwo5821 7 років тому

      I was wondering why there was so much fire and smoke, forgot about the hydraulics. (oil).

    • @blackturbine
      @blackturbine 7 років тому

      kawasaki whip two wind turbines in this video that are collective control can hold up to 30L of good stuff 40 if yaw is hydraulic powered

    • @blogengeezer4507
      @blogengeezer4507 7 років тому +2

      The fiberglass and other composites continue the combustion. Most people do not realize that the blades themselves are hollow fiberglass shells.
      During runaways, they fling themselves for great distances... if remaining intact. Read about the maintenance crew on one tower trapped during the intense, deadly fire. Rescue, if even possible, is rare.

    • @blackturbine
      @blackturbine 7 років тому

      Blogen Geezer true keeping it light so it doesn't break from its own weight

  • @alfredovalencia8889
    @alfredovalencia8889 6 років тому +392

    The fossil fuel companies pay you for this video ! ?

    • @imhappyandyou.4003
      @imhappyandyou.4003 6 років тому +1

      Alfredo Valencia Are you an Orange??🤔

    • @johnjohno410
      @johnjohno410 6 років тому +2

      And if they are? It's called business.

    • @jethrotul7688
      @jethrotul7688 6 років тому

      Fossil fuel,as in dino fuel,pa leez

    • @imhappyandyou.4003
      @imhappyandyou.4003 6 років тому +1

      Jethro Tul Yeah get me sum of that good'ole Dinomordial soup to get the V8 purring lol.

    • @marshthefox6668
      @marshthefox6668 6 років тому +3

      Probably

  • @lostmic
    @lostmic 4 роки тому

    Imagine you were inside that windmill watching the gears turn and going faster and faster on number two lol

    • @bluebird5361
      @bluebird5361 4 роки тому +1

      In Holland two people WERE inside, and they got burned alive!

    • @lostmic
      @lostmic 4 роки тому

      @@bluebird5361 What woh, that's insane lol

  • @krpmills2736
    @krpmills2736 5 років тому +5

    On the one had, 200'000 bird deaths a year caused by wind turbines..
    On the other hand, an increase of 5 degrees centigrade by 2100 of which the last example of rapid temperature rise like that would be the End Permian event which is better known as 'the great dying' in which 96% of all life died.

    • @ronaldstaples5752
      @ronaldstaples5752 5 років тому

      KRP Mills I have wind turbans on three sides of me. Still looking for a dead bird

    • @benjaminmccarter4318
      @benjaminmccarter4318 3 роки тому

      There is an estimated 1.3-4 billion birds killed a year by cats. Are cats bad for the environment? Shall we order the extermination’s of fluffies everywhere? I heard there are no cats in America. Catchy little jingle.

    • @krpmills2736
      @krpmills2736 3 роки тому

      @@benjaminmccarter4318 Did you even read what I said? I'm pointing at the fact human climate change will be the death of a lot more than 200'000 birds. Wind power is not a perfect system to use but it is so many magnitudes greater than causing higher global temperatures from burning fossil fuels or nuclear waste.

  • @Forkontheleft
    @Forkontheleft 7 років тому +290

    lets ask what the gulf of mexico would rather take a second chance with, oil or wind

    • @blackhatter011
      @blackhatter011 6 років тому +1

      Oil of course.

    • @carlboag6758
      @carlboag6758 6 років тому

      mike jakob dsss

    • @evangunderson5229
      @evangunderson5229 6 років тому

      mike jakob think of the power it would bring in

    • @jonathanniay4649
      @jonathanniay4649 6 років тому +6

      absolutely, we can also ask fukishima and prypiat about nuclear or wind....

    • @commondirtbagz7130
      @commondirtbagz7130 6 років тому

      Jonathan Niay id be willing to bet they’ll pick wind

  • @kenet71
    @kenet71 7 років тому +150

    lack of maintenance & human error.

    • @engineeringworld.
      @engineeringworld.  7 років тому +3

      Thanks for your feedback !

    • @botaautomaticweldingandcut3923
      @botaautomaticweldingandcut3923 6 років тому +2

      Every coin has two sides, maybe we could learn it from these lesson, and find a better solution

    • @Michael-bg3hn
      @Michael-bg3hn 6 років тому +2

      Melluns 07 accutally 331 tons of coal equals about 662,000 KWh but in a year a windmill produces about 6,000,000 KWh
      hypertextbook.com/facts/2006/LunChen.shtml
      www.ewea.org/wind-energy-basics/faq/

    • @mossfet
      @mossfet 6 років тому +1

      yes, most of these look like they were just running in harsh conditions, wind turbine blades rotate so they can be toggled on and off.

    • @Ackelope
      @Ackelope 6 років тому +1

      Of course they make enough and more than what was required to make them. If they didn't they'd be economically inviable and people would've realized that a while back.

  • @teawrecks1243
    @teawrecks1243 4 роки тому +3

    0:56 this is Rovio's fault, their games are giving impressionable birds delusions of grandeur

  • @aesopshair6690
    @aesopshair6690 5 років тому +1

    Have you got any clips of other power station failures for comparative purposes... Coal/gas/nuclear?

  • @jaygee6738
    @jaygee6738 6 років тому +67

    OH WOW!!!! Look at the hundreds of miles of coastline ruined when the windmill explodes.

    • @zeeshansandrana3728
      @zeeshansandrana3728 5 років тому

      Very nice and warm

    • @evelevelin
      @evelevelin 5 років тому

      nuclear power plants clearly are better

    • @EleanorPeterson
      @EleanorPeterson 5 років тому +4

      Hi, Jay Gee - Careful, my friend: the free use of irony and sarcasm can confuse UA-cam's more literal-minded viewers. Meanwhile... Yep, you're right to be outraged. It must have taken four guys two or three HOURS to clear up that mess. I mean they'd need a broom and a bucket; maybe even a shovel and a truck.
      And you can bet that the unfortunate bird (a vulture, I think) was disappointed not to have had its feathers coated in lovely black gunk before it got clobbered. Hey, if it WAS a vulture, do you think it was hanging around hoping to feed on birds killed by the turbine's blades? Now THAT would be ironic...

    • @MegaJimbob125
      @MegaJimbob125 5 років тому +1

      Complete disaster. Destroyed the ozone layer and now there's less oxygen on the earth 🤣

    • @arussianhuman5160
      @arussianhuman5160 5 років тому +1

      Hey look at the minimal destruction when a nuclear plant goes bam

  • @simonvreman
    @simonvreman 6 років тому +17

    0:22 close to my house, it was taken down on purpose. There is a new one there, not exactly friendly for the environment but not a fail.

    • @DanYHKim2
      @DanYHKim2 6 років тому +1

      Thank you. I suspected that was the case.
      There is almost no environmental impact from taking down one wind turbine, though. I'd think that plowing that field would be more environmentally damaging than the wind turbine takedown.

  • @jonah9286
    @jonah9286 5 років тому

    number 4 killed me 🤣🤣

  • @TheNextTurn
    @TheNextTurn 5 років тому +3

    Yes a farm with 100 wind turbines and when one fails ... OMG we only have 99 left.
    When a Oil refinery catches fire or coal fire plant fails the WHOLE system is done for weeks

    • @melter3098
      @melter3098 3 роки тому

      Or when Nuclear Plant explodes and almost irradiated half of Europe:
      Nah this was just human error, and as we all know, human errors don't happen twice

  • @epicmits
    @epicmits 7 років тому +374

    This video was probably made by a petroleum engineer.

    • @MartijnGP
      @MartijnGP 7 років тому +9

      Sole Survivor So are most of the comments. They are increasingly out of work anyways :P

    • @MartijnGP
      @MartijnGP 7 років тому +1

      stephen dwyer That is soms excellent reasoning you got there!

    • @BoksCar29
      @BoksCar29 7 років тому

      Well of course,!

    • @wvelez9241
      @wvelez9241 6 років тому +7

      Politician claiming to be an engineer were the makers of this video

    • @ailyngarcia7243
      @ailyngarcia7243 6 років тому

      Marley Ottman dweee

  • @rafishaheenian2468
    @rafishaheenian2468 5 років тому +138

    Thanks for sharing, but, I must say, the title is a bit off, and the details are a bit lacking.

    • @Novusa
      @Novusa 4 роки тому +1

      Not to see if wind tirbines are friendly

    • @jerrysmith7449
      @jerrysmith7449 4 роки тому

      IG Midas - What are trying to say?

    • @shurshot2764
      @shurshot2764 3 роки тому

      a BIT????????????????

    • @JonDingle
      @JonDingle 3 роки тому +3

      @@Novusa Any wind turbine failure is environmentally safe compared to a hydro dam bursting, a steam boiler exploding and a nuclear power plant "incident"!

    • @Flassh81
      @Flassh81 2 роки тому

      You know, I can show some videos of house failures and how deadly those are to the environment. But you would still need shelter

  • @halbrown7121
    @halbrown7121 4 роки тому

    It is a true joy to see these things self destruct.

  • @CuttingEdgePowerLLC
    @CuttingEdgePowerLLC 4 роки тому

    What features should have a good windmill?

  • @dfl4701
    @dfl4701 5 років тому +96

    I kind of feel like that bird was an idiot....

  • @coreytrevor424
    @coreytrevor424 6 років тому +331

    Title is either clickbait or this video was only made for propaganda purposes. Wind turbines can have problems just like any other energy source but compared to coal they're clearly better for the environment.

    • @darabradley5173
      @darabradley5173 6 років тому +1

      Terry Melvin and the hills and mountains of Ireland 🇮🇪

    • @bitrexgm
      @bitrexgm 6 років тому +10

      it would take a crew of a half-dozen guys and a couple trucks maybe a week to pick up the pieces of these fails vs. whatever it costs to clean up 1 million barrels of oil in the ocean

    • @austindenotter19
      @austindenotter19 6 років тому +3

      How are they better for the environment when they dont produce enough revenue to sustain themselves? You can not rob Peter to pay Paul.

    • @RayBlackburn
      @RayBlackburn 6 років тому +9

      You are absolutely wrong as it takes coal oil and gas to manufacture and keep a wind generator running
      It actually uses more coal oil and gas to build and install one then keep it running than it will ever be able to save over just using coal fired generators
      In short you are the one spewing propaganda

    • @behindthewallsleepin
      @behindthewallsleepin 5 років тому +7

      Terry Melvin they're certainly less ugly than a coal mine! Less of an eyesore too.

  • @kg4tnp
    @kg4tnp 5 років тому

    Good thing those older units are being phased out for ones that don't have these issues, but strangely the anti-windmill people always forget to mention that fact.

    • @jamest3552
      @jamest3552 Рік тому

      Nah, windmills are great & nostalgic, wind turbines suck though.

  • @Kazilikaya
    @Kazilikaya 3 роки тому +1

    Texas is experiencing rolling blackouts as wind turbines freeze in a winter storm.

    • @DatsOdd
      @DatsOdd 3 роки тому +1

      I feel bad for those Texans, their wind turbines down there in the south aren't built for the cold like ours up here in SW Minnesota.

  • @adrianomaccaus8717
    @adrianomaccaus8717 6 років тому +5

    2:08
    When you are a wind turbine and you realise that you are on the Teletubbies' hill

  • @aaronsmith5687
    @aaronsmith5687 6 років тому +100

    Alot cleaner than coal... yeah birds might get hit rarely but at least their not flying through clouds of smoke and smog. Most of the windmills in the video are old. New ones are made with gears that keep them from spinning too fast

    • @KILLKING110
      @KILLKING110 6 років тому +6

      your not right about the bird statistic the Fish and Game estimates 10,000 birds a year are killed by wind farms and the power companies that build these wind farms get free pass to kill bald eagles while us peons are fined and possibly jailed if we kill a bald eagle.

    • @MrJokkoma
      @MrJokkoma 6 років тому +3

      KILLKING110 Do you know how much birds traffic kill every year? This ain't nothing in comparison.

    • @johnjohno410
      @johnjohno410 6 років тому +6

      It's cats that kill more birds than anything else. Then there is buildings that kill more birds than wind mills.

    • @MrJokkoma
      @MrJokkoma 6 років тому +3

      John Johno I think it's safe to say that there is a lot that kills more birds than windmills.

    • @PJB4453
      @PJB4453 6 років тому +3

      Nuclear is the best.

  • @vincentrobinette1507
    @vincentrobinette1507 4 роки тому

    The fifth one was the best by far!(#1) the second one, (#4) was a planned demolition, not a failure. You can't see the cable that leads down to a tandem axle dump truck used to pull it down, but the horn sound was produced by that truck, to warn, that the turbine was about to topple. The excavator to the right of the turbine was probably used to dig around the foundation, so the truck could pull it down.

  • @darthlahey5392
    @darthlahey5392 4 роки тому

    THE BIRD LOL

  • @triz313
    @triz313 5 років тому +229

    Their fail rate is hilariously low. I think its good for people to understand that they aren't infallible, but this video and headline are pretty much click bait.

    • @scottday1988
      @scottday1988 5 років тому +3

      triz313 they are still shit and worthless. Tree hugger propaganda.

    • @triz313
      @triz313 5 років тому +6

      @@scottday1988 I mean if science is propaganda... Look, I'm not going to take the jobs of oil workers and coal miners away. It's a finite resource, but it's still important. But as a country, and as a global community, we've got to find better sources of energy. There's a reason miners get black lung. There's a reason oil spills kill and some wells poison. You've got to be honest yourself about whether or not you would want to live next to a plant spewing pollution next to your house. I'm willing to bet you don't live anywhere near a place like that.

    • @badreality2
      @badreality2 5 років тому +1

      @@triz313 Look up LFTRs, and Kirk Sorenson.

    • @triz313
      @triz313 5 років тому +1

      badreality2 Thorium. I watched a few docs about it. Very intriguing.

    • @scottday1988
      @scottday1988 5 років тому +1

      triz313 not far from one coal gens don’t spew smoke like they used to. As an oil field worker I can vouch that we make as small a foot print as possible. We are conservationists we live here too. We go out of our way for wild life. I agree with the finding new energy sources. I just hate wind and solar. Wind turbines are ugly unsightly landscape spoiling hideous junk. Solar field are built in wet lands they don’t produce enough energy for the space they take up

  • @phuonglam5363
    @phuonglam5363 5 років тому +148

    R.I.P Bird

    • @gertjanvandermeij4265
      @gertjanvandermeij4265 5 років тому +10

      Fuck that stupid bird !

    • @marcushenness6437
      @marcushenness6437 5 років тому +11

      The next state over from me has only a few hundred windmills. I talked to an ex co worker, who used to work on them, and he said they find thousands of birds dead every year from windmills. He said the blades are too thin and aerodynamic so they basically run so silent birds don't detect them.

    • @rustyshakleford7002
      @rustyshakleford7002 5 років тому +5

      @@marcushenness6437 I monitor several 2.2 mgw turbines near a very bird populated lake, in 5 years I have never found a dead bird, I have seen them playing in and around the blades as they run, eagles, hasks even buzzards, they don't seem to be bothered.

    • @knottreel
      @knottreel 5 років тому +1

      The eagle has landed.

    • @bernihautzi1604
      @bernihautzi1604 5 років тому +1

      Titanic: yea 😭😭😭😭😭 😢😢😢😢:(

  • @kaffii
    @kaffii 5 років тому +6

    I was gonna hide in the comments from the collapsing huge fans but everyone’s so salty I’d rather be a bird caught in a blade

    • @Scrod117
      @Scrod117 3 роки тому

      Well it's for a good cause a least, right?

    • @kaffii
      @kaffii 3 роки тому

      @@Scrod117 i forgot i even commented this what is this video

  • @christophercotton9048
    @christophercotton9048 4 роки тому

    1:05 Cue the TPIR Losing Horns for that poor birdie.

  • @FiloVFX
    @FiloVFX 7 років тому +232

    Do a "5 Nuclear plants which Failed" and see if this is environment-friendly or not.

    • @Pistolita221
      @Pistolita221 6 років тому +25

      FiloClip or oil spills, or fracking, or refinery fires, or tanker explosions, or pipe ruptures or oil feild fires, or coal mine explosions/collapses. It's fucking laughable comparing a wind turbines failure to any other energy production except solar, geothermal, and hydroelelctric.

    • @owenprince4823
      @owenprince4823 6 років тому +6

      All nuclear power plants fail because they have no way of dealing with the waste by-product from nuclear power plants so every one of them FAIL. Every one of them are an environmental disaster in slow motion until they explode like in Japan and then they contaminate every bit of the planet. That is the biggest fail of all.

    • @pauhull
      @pauhull 6 років тому +18

      just stfu nuclear energy is safe

    • @rcole1175
      @rcole1175 6 років тому +7

      Yes, "NUCLER" it is safe...until it goes HORRIBLY WRONG.

    • @hmhmhmlol3252
      @hmhmhmlol3252 6 років тому +2

      +John Harrison
      Except nobody's comparing wind to oil and coal, and when you do compare wind to solar, geothermal, and hydroelectric, wind is laughably bad. Pointing to dirty energy sources doesn't excuse wind from being the shittiest out of all the clean energy sources.

  • @PhobosTK
    @PhobosTK 6 років тому +16

    I can't see how the 4th is a turbine fail. The 2nd is epic

    • @NaumRusomarov
      @NaumRusomarov 6 років тому +1

      #2 probably someone forgot to turn it off or it was a malfunction, they're not supposed to work during a storm with winds that exceed a certain nominal velocity.

  • @casek1238
    @casek1238 4 роки тому

    like the propeller of an airplane, that pulls the entire airplane forward, a windturbine also wants to move, but it is fixed on its pole. It still wants to move, so with heavy windblow it breaks from its fixing foot.

  • @barneyboy7771
    @barneyboy7771 4 роки тому

    I am pretty sure that the following list of mechanical devices listed when built contain these items. using hydraulic oil, plastics, electric motors generators (alternators) and are known to give major problems when they do break down. Planes, cars, trucks, earth moving equipment, ships, all large modern buildings (industrial and commercial). Rockets both commercial and military

  • @mrchandler2649
    @mrchandler2649 5 років тому +4

    0:22 when you trust fall but you don’t get caught

  • @briansteffmagnussen9078
    @briansteffmagnussen9078 7 років тому +7

    I think that scene number two was a Danish mill. That mill took some severe force but had to give up after all. I was working at the plant where they cut the steel from coils for the towers and where the bottom flange flange was cut with plasma burner. The reason for the mill malfunction was the brakes that failed allowing the mill to run free in very strong wind. the bottom flange should be 30 centimeters thick and the plasma burner cuts with a tolerance of 1,5 millimeter. All steel for the tower body is certified and stamped with highly approved quality control. The yield stress of the steel for the tower body should be 350 to 400, not sure after so many years. The steel was made in Sweden from the best material from the company SSAB Svensk Stål Aktie Bolag. The yield stress number stand for the strength and flexibility of the steel.

  • @achterhoeker72
    @achterhoeker72 5 років тому +30

    Modern wind turbines switch off during storms and have an integrated fire extinguishing system. In any case, a burning wind turbine is less of a problem than when a nuclear power plant explodes.

    • @LMProjectsZ28
      @LMProjectsZ28 5 років тому +4

      They dont explode, that's only steam that causes an explosion, fusion reactors are safe entirely

    • @Enzi_Meteori_902
      @Enzi_Meteori_902 5 років тому

      They simulated the wind turbine to fall down on the 5th one, the storm didn't do anything to it except for making it wet and soggy

    • @ronaldstaples5752
      @ronaldstaples5752 5 років тому

      XxQw34TyM069xX Plutonium escapes with that steam

    • @jamest3552
      @jamest3552 Рік тому

      ​@@ronaldstaples5752 That was debunked too.

    • @marshmower
      @marshmower 11 місяців тому

      No power at all kills people. Face facts

  • @shaunwallace7506
    @shaunwallace7506 4 роки тому

    Literally just watch "water tower falling fails" now I'm watching this

  • @topwilkon9652
    @topwilkon9652 5 років тому +140

    I saw a wind turbine kill a dolphin. It was brutal.

    • @GrrMeister
      @GrrMeister 5 років тому +4

      Sure it wasn't a 'Flying Fish' ⚠ ☠ ♒ ✌

    • @CL-lk5kz
      @CL-lk5kz 5 років тому +3

      how can it kill a dolphin, it can't be on water -_-

    • @topwilkon9652
      @topwilkon9652 5 років тому +4

      @@CL-lk5kz it was a Japanese model

    • @gheetza14
      @gheetza14 5 років тому +1

      Link pls

    • @toughtalk747
      @toughtalk747 5 років тому +1

      C L ua-cam.com/video/4ySwVDRKCns/v-deo.html
      Are you sure?

  • @adityamishra2779
    @adityamishra2779 5 років тому +5

    2:29 this scene looks exactly in Windows XP 😂

  • @camcamshitpost8056
    @camcamshitpost8056 5 років тому +13

    1:30 CREEPER BOUT TO BLOW UP MY HOUSE

  • @scottprodj
    @scottprodj 2 роки тому

    A bird flies into a wind turbine, killing itself, and the turbine "failed." Interesting twist.

  • @Diveyl
    @Diveyl 6 років тому +3

    Speed of the end of the blade can be seen as slow, but actually it is well over 150km/h. In number 2 the speed of the blades end's would be approaching sonic barrier, or even went over it. Usually in strong winds the rotor should be stopped to prevent the construction from tearing apart like it was shown, but the brakes must have malfunctioned.

  • @victorl.6128
    @victorl.6128 5 років тому +8

    Exxon Valdez. Three Mile Island. Chernobyl, Fukushima......ETC. Five wind turbines OMG.
    Eyes, ears and mind need to be open. If some one says "no regrets" they are a lair or a fool. But thanks for the thoughts Jon.

    • @rossy2998
      @rossy2998 5 років тому +1

      My country has enough hydro power to power the country until it has about 1.5x the current population but they have to go and put ugly fucken wind mills that are huge. They cover the ranges and have ruined the landscape.

    • @TheXanderGrim
      @TheXanderGrim 5 років тому

      TMI was not as bad as people think . and the main issue is in this area we have a radon issue which causes thyroid cancer people do not take that into account Fukashima was a natural disaster it could happen anywhere it was stupid to build it in a subduction zone Exon was a bad captain who was drunk at the helm . Also you are ill informed on Gen 3 nuclear

    • @ethanlamoureux5306
      @ethanlamoureux5306 5 років тому +1

      Wind and solar are more deadly than nuclear. And we don’t get much electricity at all from petroleum, so why the mention of Exxon Valdez?

  • @vidsforu1
    @vidsforu1 2 роки тому

    1:39 how windy was it when that happend?

  • @tonyrigo9096
    @tonyrigo9096 5 років тому

    COOL video

  • @tauIrrydah
    @tauIrrydah 6 років тому +4

    It's probably bearing overload mostly, they're going too fast for it to cope then heat gets into the system and into the housing.

  • @TheSeandelgatto2001
    @TheSeandelgatto2001 6 років тому +74

    million of automobile failures a year (Environmentally friendly?)

    • @Apjooz
      @Apjooz 5 років тому +1

      Nope. Some are quite the selective environmental activists.

    • @docpossum2460
      @docpossum2460 5 років тому +1

      The statistics of fatal car crashes do put gun death statistics to shame.

  • @remariteshvlog5148
    @remariteshvlog5148 2 роки тому

    Thanks sir

  • @ToledoTJ664
    @ToledoTJ664 5 років тому

    0:55 he was playing to be "don vergas" 😂...

    • @benjaminmccarter4318
      @benjaminmccarter4318 3 роки тому

      Don quixote of buzzards. Tilting at turbines. It’s a dangerous affair

  • @thomasjones9394
    @thomasjones9394 7 років тому +10

    We should paint them green so they fit/blend in

    • @davros0007
      @davros0007 7 років тому +4

      Thomas Jones Then we can get more birdstrike vids!

    • @thomasjones9394
      @thomasjones9394 7 років тому +4

      Green half blue half. Perhaps a whistle at a pitch birds can hear but not humans.

    • @engineeringworld.
      @engineeringworld.  7 років тому +2

      This would be rather more effective.

    • @ihcnavistar7293
      @ihcnavistar7293 7 років тому +2

      Julia Sjögren No, it doesen't. It is a video of windmills, dumbass. There is nothing to disprove Global Warming in it, despite what you and your fellow conspiretards want to believe.

    • @Sammakko7
      @Sammakko7 7 років тому +1

      Thomas Jones BECAUSE THE SKY IS GREEN AND NOT BLUE AND WHITE!!!

  • @williamking632
    @williamking632 6 років тому +5

    I just got into the industry of wind turbines.. even though some break down, i was told maybe ten a year across the country, the worst part of a wind turbine is the ladder on the inside that a technician has to climb to get to the top for maintenance.. it is over 250 feet to get up there.. I would put a turbine in my backyard before a coal mine.. so if these things fail, it’s because of age, human error or an act of god...

  • @legosam2067
    @legosam2067 5 років тому

    They should all have a safety mechanism like if the wind speed is too fast.

  • @Janina-qq1cp
    @Janina-qq1cp 5 років тому +2

    R.I.P brid

  • @DavidEricPrates
    @DavidEricPrates 7 років тому +3

    "Lance are you sure that you tightened up the two bolts on the back of the post? Lance, "Ummmm....yep!" 0:26

  • @Jemalacane0
    @Jemalacane0 7 років тому +12

    Use vertical axis wind turbines with bird screens.

    • @Hells_Gate
      @Hells_Gate 7 років тому +6

      use river and sea turbines and chop up fish instead, remember Nirvana said fish dont have any feelings :)

    • @BryanYachimetz
      @BryanYachimetz 7 років тому

      VAWTs are less efficient than HAWTs.

    • @maalsy
      @maalsy 7 років тому

      Gammareign no they don't they have nothing to keep the birds away. I know this bc my dad is building a wind farm

  • @globoytee
    @globoytee 4 роки тому +2

    1:36 how it feels to chew 5 gum