I live in Japan and rent Mazda’s from time to time. I find the rotary knob to be a little confusing for about five minutes, and then I get used to it. And then I’m glad I’m not constantly reaching to do anything. The knob makes it much easier to do basic things while staying comfortably seated with eyes on the road.
Bro it's just the same on any BMW. And yes it is really the simplest and efficient way to interact without risk of loosing attention. Coupled with a hud that both Mazda and BMW have, it's just great. IMO a digital touch screen has nothing to do on any car. This should be not allowed.
@@mrgurulittle7000 I have a 2021 premium CX 30. I love it! I don't think it's underpowered. I think it's a very soft ride. The infotainment is easy to use in my opinion I don't care whether the passenger has power seats or not as long as I have it
My wife and my wife bought one yesterday i love it, its such a fun car to drive and since I live in NY the size is perfect which is not too big or not to small since its just the 2 of us and a small dog. So glad i got this car.
I don't see how everyone finds the infotainment so confusing, had it figured out in about 10 minutes of fiddling, and it's a huge boon to not have everything buried in a touch screen. You also still have physical media and hvac controls. As someone who hates ipad cars this control scheme is perfect.
As others have said, like any Mazda, the driving experience and the driver is something that will get the priority and I can confirm these really are fun to drive. I got hooked on non-touch infotainment screens owning older Audis for years and will never go back…give it a little time and you can use a Mazda infotainment blindfolded and have the cleanest looking screen in the class. Huge reason I started working at Mazda last year, the fun and the infotainment!
I agree 100% on the infotainment system. Give me dials any day. In fact, one of the reasons that I looked at the Mazda to begin with was because I didn't want a great big giant slab of glass sticking out of the dashboard and blocking my forward view. Or, mounted on the dash and in reality being too far away to reach and touch the screen anyways. It takes no time at all to get used to using the dial and the buttons on the console I can do anything I want without having to take my eyes off the road.
@@carlmontney7916 That’s a load of shit. You still have to take your eyes off the road for a second to view what’s selected on the screen. You act like the rotary knob prevents this but it absolutely doesn’t. You’re still touching something and still taking your eyes off the road. This doesn’t improve anything at all vs having a touchscreen.
@@MidwestPisces All I can say is that is your opinion. In my case I don't agree with it. As you obviously didn't agree with mine. IDK If you're just trying to troll this or if you are actually not capable of multitasking a bit while you drive? Because I can tell you and so will many others who have used rotary controls That between the rotary knob and the steering wheel controls for the radio you don't have to take your eyes off the road anymore than you would if you were looking at your side mirrors or checking your rearview mirror. You will end up having to take your eyes off the road a lot more when you are looking at your GPS for your next driving direction. Or even worse staring at your cell phone and texting while you're driving down the road.
@@carlmontney7916 So you go from saying how your eyes never leave the road to finally admitting that they do but it’s similar to other driving activities like checking one’s mirrors. You know what else is similar? Using a touchscreen infotainment system. The rotary knob provides no benefit at all.
This car is not conflicting!! lol, its just build right. It shows you can still build a car without 9 or 10 speed transmissions and get great gas milage and performace my 2020 CX-30's 6 speed had a little learning to do and after about 500 miles the shifts smoothed out but shifts were always very quick. The suspension is not the latest tech but its tuned and even with the skinny tires gives excellent handling in the Tenessee mountain!!. I will say I prefere the non-touch screen vs. the touch screen on my 2024 Chevy Blazer, just less destracting and very easy to use. Great review though very enjoyable to watch. You are right the change in tires realy improves handling especially the rear end, over bumps, I went with Cooper Discoverer EnduraMax as I need "some" snow traction, night and day diffrence ride is still firm but never disturbed now. I drive mine 100 miles a day, mostly highway with short trips around town. Driving to Florida and tennessee this is like riding in your own personal cacoon, love it. Keep the videos coming.
We have a 2021 CX-30 GT Turbo. I got over the rear suspension although the car can be rather jittery in the rear on rough roads. Interior it's upscale, don't mind the infotainment and the AWD system is fantastic in the snow. One of the 1st things I did is get new wheels & tires, 235/50/18 Michelin A/S 4 on new wheels transform this car. Coming from Audi/BMW/Mercedes sedans past 10 years, never though we'd have a cross over, but this was the best I tried over Honda HR-V, Hyundai Kona and Toyota CHR. Seltos and Taos both had stop sales just around the time we bought in August 2021.
@@sgrant9814 No, i can't recall the exact # but is was < 1%. These wider tires in corners is where this car is transformed...handles so much better. No rubbing therefore no affect on turning radius.
This makes more sense with the non-turbo. The top trim at 37K opens up the CX-5 and other competitors. We currently own a CX-9 and a Mazda 3 sedan before that. So, I’m a fan.
I went to a car “show” of sorts at a local mall a few months ago. I got into a CX-90, and sat in it. I had just finished a lease of the RDX (2021), and I felt that the Mazda was more “premium” and comfortable on the inside. I think Mazda has successfully gotten into that premium/luxury bracket even if people haven’t quite noticed yet.
@@tedunguent156 I think it's personal preference? I'd prefer to drive smaller cars, and the CX-30 turbo is the best car you can get in the small suv range without going luxury..
My wife bought a top trim version of the CX-30 with the normally aspirated 2.5 engine. You won't mistake it for a sports car, but it is fun to drive and has more than adequate power. The really good news is that in the year we have had it, it has achieved an average of 8 liters of fuel per 100 km (29.4 MPG US). That is the combined average. It gets around 34 MPG US on a highway trip. With the higher MSRP, mediocre gas mileage, and extra parts to potentially fail for the turbo version, I think the normally aspirated one is the best bet. However, if you like to light the tires up, well you do you.
I sold wife's 2012 Versa for $5000 and bought a Base model 2023 CX-30 and paid $19,000 (with the money down from her Versa). As he states @ 27:15 the "base model" is the bargain - so True. We have owned it now for 6 months (5,100 miles) - trouble free. Some of the things we like are: The price and it's all wheel drive! I live in the desert of Arizona but downhill ski at the 3 ski resorts in AZ & two in southern Colorado so the All-Wheel-Drive is a plus. I personally like that it still has a real transmission, no CVT. The info/radio dial (took a couple days to become familiar) but we like it because you don't have to take your eyes off the road to use it. The driving lights are very bright at night. The only dislike would be maybe the seats. If you are over-weight you probably won't like them.
Thanks Alex, I just bought a 2023 CX-30 Turbo Premium today, and in the same exact colors (inside and out) that you test drove. Your review has given me reassurance that I made the right choice. I bought it as a certified pre-owned vehicle for slightly less than $30K, thousands less than when it was brand new, and it only has 6k miles. Coming from owning a Caddy ATS with a 2.0L Turbo, I felt tired of driving sedans and sprung for one of these, obviously in a turbo because settling for a regular 2.5L would probably have been a disappointment.
I love Mazdas infotainment. I hate fingerprints on the screen and if you sit very far back, it's always a reach to even touch it anyways. Great review as always though, always super informative and in depth! 😊
@crow_2k11beatsbydre8 how did you know i use a flip phone? I love my Z Fold5 😂😂😂 but I still hate fingerprints on my car radio. So I like my dial 👌🏼 to each their own I suppose
I love the headlights the turn with the steering wheel. I owned a Mazda with that feature and was picking up my girlfriend at the BMW dealer. I started my car and my headlights swiveled on startup as a quick self check. The BMW salesman noticed and told me I had a really nice car!
People always complain about the transmission only having 6 gears vs 8 or even 10 gears. The additional gears dont necessarily mean a better final drive ratio. With all the torque of the Mazda 2.5 engine, you dont need a trans that needs those additional gears to keep the RPM in the sweet spot. BTW spirited driving for a week and then complaining about MPG really isnt a fair comparison. I'm averaging more than 24 MPG in city driving over the 1800 miles my car currently has.
I love my 2022 CX-30 Carbon Edition (non-turbo 2.5L engine), but I did have to black-out the front/side silver trim, roof rails & more to make that black cladding palatable for me. 18 months in thus far & have been 100% problem/issue free. It's the best crossover in this size/price segment for the USA/NA market IMO. It rides & handles nicely & has a quiet, insulated cabin. Also, no crappy belt/chain design CVT on the CX-30. But, not a fan of how the main projector headlights are used as the DRL (which I can turn off via the system settings in the USA, at least). I've come to prefer Mazda over Toyota or Honda these days (as far as ICE vehicles are concerned). I average 31-32 MPG in my non-turbo CX-30, & that is almost all around-town suburban errand running driving, not open HW miles. The 186/191hp non-turbo 2.5L engine is plenty peppy IMO, & I found the turbo to be overkill (at the expense of MPG) for my driving needs & style.
Great review but I wish you had reviewed a model with the base engine. Most buyers will choose the lower trims with the base engine so I'm tired of reviewers all reviewing the CX-30 Turbo.
@@AAutoBuyersGuideI bought a new, naturally aspirated CX30 last December (a ‘22 model). Never once have I felt that it needed more power. It doesn’t scorch the pavement with sub 6 second acceleration numbers, but it has more than enough power for any driving situation to give the driver plenty of confidence. The gas tank is small, which has taken some getting used to, but I’m getting 28-29 MPG mixed driving. I love my CX-30 - it’s my first Mazda. Annoyed it doesn’t have heated side mirrors, but it’s as quiet & comfortable to me as the Chrysler Pacifica it replaced. If a crossover still fits my needs in four to five years I’d likely go for the CX-50, but if rear seat interior room is not an issue then save the extra cost and go for the CX-30. It’s a satisfying drive and punches above its weight in almost every area.
@@KMS5280 I'm with you. I picked up a 2023 Carbon Edition in February. The NA engine is more than adequate and is downright fun on winding VT mountain roads in sport mode. I'm sitting around 30mpg in mixed, my highway trips have been around 35mpg.
The infotainment is actually quite good I really like it, very easy to use you will get used to it really fast. Great car if you like to drive a sporty car.
Really enjoyed your review! I purchased a 2023 CX-30 Carbon Edition in January. I passed on the Turbo model even after the “powerful” test drive. It might have been a different story if the turbo had a six speed manual and better rear suspension. I really enjoy the NA engine even with the current 6 speed auto. The ride is certainly better since ditching the stock tires in favor of Michelin Cross-Climate2s. For me this model has been much more of a fun drive than my previous underpowered CVT Crosstrek.
I just bought one after Thanksgiving. Got the Carbon Edition 2023. It feels like a luxury vehicle. Pretty awesome coming from a used 2011 Nissan sentra lol.
Regarding gas mileage per gallon, I have a 2018 Mazda6 GT which has the same motor as the turbo version of this vehicle, but not AWD. Driving on the highway at 75mph in the northeast in the summer, I can achieve 33-35mpg on the highway easily. Off highway, I get 30 mpg. Not sure how hard reviewers drive their vehicles to get such low values, but I would guess that when you own the vehicle and drive it normally, the mpg numbers are significantly higher than when they are flogged. My wife and I drove a CX-50 and the CX-30 and the CX-50 IS STIFF. The CX-30 was quiet and very well composed on Northeast roads. The overall impression of this vehicle is that of relatively high quality, quiet ride, with fantastic driver dynamics. Next up in our test drive for her is the CX-5. We want to replace her 2014 CX-9 within the next year. Might wait to see what is up with the CX-70.
Price and no independent rear suspension is why I went with the CX5 Carbon Turbo for $32k. Excellent point on the limitations of the 6 speed. Anything above 70 mph, your MPGs really take a dive. Around town, the turbo get around 19mpg.
Nice review. I'm currently driving a 2023 Mazda CX-50 Preferred Plus. This is my fourth Mazda, following a 2016 Mazda3 hatchback, a 2018 CX-5 AWD, and a 2020 CX-5 FWD. Regarding AWD in Florida, when I moved down here in 2018 I was driving the 2018 CX-5 AWD. In June 2020 I leased the 2020 CX-5 FWD, figuring that traction control would be fine instead of AWD. I was wrong. AWD is superior to traction control, at least as far as Mazda is concerned. The CX-50 is AWD, as are all current Mazda crossovers, and I like having AWD again. As for why Mazda left out some features in the CX-30, I think that it may be because Mazda didn't want the CX-30 to compete too much with the CX-5 and CX-50. I test drove a 2020 CX-30 and found it too small inside compared with the CX-5, and for the price difference between the two models, similarly equipped, I felt that the CX-5 was the better value.
I'm sorry, but that's nonsense. Unless you are breaking traction or pushing a vehicle hard and nearing its limits, there is no discernable difference between AWD and FWD on dry and wet roads in normal driving. If I can drive a RWD truck with a light rear end, no traction control, and 242hp on wet Florida roads, I think the average person can manage just fine with FWD if they simply drove decently. It sounds like you're leasing vehicles since you have a new one every 2-3yrs, so you're not having to deal with the disadvantages of owning an AWD vehicle long term. Tires always have to be replaced all 4 at a time, otherwise, it puts extra strain on your AWD components and wears things out faster. Plus, you just have the extra components to maintain and replace over time. I don't know why some people insist on making car ownership a more troublesome and costly experience.
@@palebeachbum I found that on wet pavement accelerating from a stop with the FWD CX-5 I had more slippage then with the AWD version. Also, when pulling out from my development I had to make a left turn. No traffic light, so I had to accelerate quickly to get into the flow of traffic (two lanes each way). With the FWD I would squeal the tires every time, but never with the AWD.
@@stuartaaron613 yikes, that sounds pretty dangerous. If traffic is that heavy on the road you're pull onto they really should put up a traffic light. People shouldn't have to spin tires pulling out just to avoid an accident.
@@palebeachbum The developments on each sie get a flashing red light, while the main road gets a flashing amber. Fat lot of good it does. And yes, there have been accidents there over the years, but the authorities won't do anything about it.
I'm sure that one reason the Mazda (any Mazda) might not sell very well in your area is because there are a limited number of dealerships. I happen to have a Mazda dealer within a mile of my home but the next nearest one is at least 30 miles away.
@@tedunguent156 Mazda is very popular in eastern Canada, there are 3 dealerships in my city alone. AWD is not a luxury for the winters over there and now all their SUVs have it at all trim levels.
I have a 2021 CX-30 Turbo Premium Plus. Fun to drive, but certain things that disappoint. The heads up windshield display. Great feature if it has all of the essential information you need, but it doesn't, which forces you to divide your attention between the windshield display and the dashboard instrument cluster. Defeats the whole purpose. At a minimum add the turn signals and transmission mode (auto or manual) and it would clearly be better. The tiny cup holder hidden behind the shift lever is a total waste. I want something that will hold a real coffee cup, that I can safely and comfortable reach. for those long commutes. I realize that would require a complete rearrangement of the center console. Do it. The ergonomics of the switches falls well short of a thoughtful ergonomic design, in particular the controls on the steering wheel. Cramming a bunch of tiny switches together with insufficient size and spatial separation is not ergonomic. It's a little disappointing that the same attention to details when it comes to driving dynamics has not been appled to the interior switches and controls. The little things make a big difference, and speaking of little things, the 12 gallon gas tank... I hate having to fuel up as often as I do, but I guess that's as large of a tank as could be fit into it.
I understand the "turbo-hunger" for power, as most people counting horses before buying, but after 6 years living iwth a turbo car, I opted for the non turbo, specifically , because I like the extra gas mileage and less worries. People reading and undecided, trust me. The 190-ish HP from the naturally aspirated is plenty! You still get a powerful car, some other cars with turbos make about 200hp and you are nearly there, without one! You also get ..more...reliability...with the non turbo ones. Trust me, turbo cars with more HP can be exciting yes, but they are also something in the back of your mind, because they can also be a ticking time bomb. If you commute a lot, go for the non turbo. Take it from a former turbo-crazed driver. The gas mileage adds up quickly!
In Europe we get a 2.0 NA engine with 186 horse power as the top spec engine, the fuel economy is averaging 6L/100 km in my case which is fantastic for an engine of this size and power, it's specially good to have it in manual, because playing with the gears is what really makes this a fun car. I always look back at it after I get out because is just gorgeous.
For a little more coin get the CX 5. The CX-30 is great but very tight inside. Plus, the CX5 is more of a comfortable ride. Still, compared to the others on the list I would easily choose the Mazda.
@@AAutoBuyersGuide ihhs and ncap crash score is showing its very similar to the best scores for lot less money and weight (less dangerious to others, less oradwear, less tire wear brake wear etc) . checked out some but engine shakes when idling especially when air codnitioning is on especially at full AC power... maybe the shaking over the years will lead to loosening connection between engine and car structure? maybe it can be fixed for cheap? honda crv , old lexus etc did not shake as such. disappointing
I own one of these ('21 premium n/a) soul red/white. Initially i was put off by the infotainment system but now two yrs later i love it and prefer it over the touch screen in my honda. An additional benefit is no fingerprints. I do wish the glove box were bigger snd a bin style,,,,this slot one is too darn small. For fuel econ my 2 and a half year total avg is 32.5 and i have gotten 35-36 all hwy at 65-75 mph
Mazda's are outdated when it comes to driver assist features. I don't know why most reviewers don't focus on driver assist capabilities. This is the main reason I would buy a new car. Mazda's driver assist only works when cruise control is on, while some competition works at any speed. That makes the competition so much more relaxing and easier to drive day to day.
@@paulholterhaus7084 Felt pretty decent to me. Are you sure it would've been the worst chair you've sat upon in only 70 years? I suspect your butt may be a bit recalibrated.
You're driving that 30 hard! I'm getting 30 mpgs in my 23 turbo 5 with mixed driving conditions, including spirited. I definitely enjoy the turbo so I'm confused as why your mileage is so low.
Great review, thanks so much. I'm seriously thinking of getting one for my wife. Unfortunately, I drive her car (Subaru Forester) from time to time and the CVT drives me crazy. At its price point, the Mazda seems like the only option.
I've always been conflicted about this car too. I loved it when it came out, now I'm not sure. I wish there was a hybrid version, and of course the cladding was a little more restrained. I don't really need or want AWD, and I was disappointed when Mazda took away the choice. I'm curious to see how/if the next generation evolves. More MPG would be nice, and I don't really care about the rear seat room since I rarely have more than 1 passenger. I rode in a Corolla Cross a few weeks ago and it was just so drab and depressing, that it's probably off my list- especially for the dealer markups right now.
Taos looks great and seems like a compelling package, but then the reliability and repair costs remind you it's a VW and you should have bought something else.
I have the 2024 CX30 2.5 S premium it is an absolute joy to drive and it handles great but there are some things that I just don't understand what Mazda's thinking was. Namely, why do you put a rear view camera on there but you don't also include an audible backup warning? That makes no sense considering that even my cheapy 2014 Kia Sportage had an audible warning when you were backing up. Granted, you're supposed to be paying attention when you back up and not looking around but sometimes you can get distracted by movements in front of or off to the side of your vehicle when you're backing up especially in a crowded parking lot That's when an audible warning is needed. The other thing is the clunky way you have to enter an address into the navigation system using that rotary dial can take forever. And using the voice activation to speak and address into the navigation system is hit or miss. Now you can use the app on your phone and go in there and find the address and send it to your car but it's still kind of clunky all the way around. I know you can use Android Auto or Apple's car play and then use your phone's navigation system but I don't like that as much as I do the larger screen when I use the built-in nav system. I also like that the heads up display gives you the street names and the turns while using the stock navigation system. I'm also not a fan of the small gas tank IDK Maybe they had to do that to fit it in since it has an axle and drive unit in the rear too. It shouldn't be a problem for me as 90% of my driving is going to be around town anyways but hopefully on a long trip I won't spend more time stopping for gas than I will actually drive in and getting to my destination. Now, all that said. It's a great vehicle for the money It looks good it handles well It's got enough power and overall I'm happy with it. In the end isn't that what matters? That we're happy with what we bought. I have owned mine less than a month so I'm still in the honeymoon stage. However,after the first week I already knew that it was a vehicle that I was going to be able to be happy with long term.
I'd really like to see a (standard, non-plug-in) hybrid version (rather than turbo - although offering both would be fine). Mazda's line up is lacking for hybrids - it's only got the Tank Plug In (CX-90). Their electric MX-30 leaves a lot to be desired, in comparison to competitors.
10:45 There is no need for a touchscreen as it is unsafe and uncomfortable to lean over a screen while driving. Touchscreens should have never been allowed in cars in the first place.
Before buying my CX30 (2023) I tested and compared it with the Toyota Yaris Cross, the Suzuki S-Cross, and the Mazda 3. Obviously I liked the CX-30 more.
First time I’ve heard mention of the turbo engine being more sensitive to air temperature than fuel type 🤔 I’ll have to test that out with my CX-5 turbo.
The OEm tires might be fitting for the base model, but it really should have better tires for the turbo version and higher trims. The OEM tires seems good for gas mileage and treadwear. Better tires can improve on tire noise, comfort, lateral g's, and braking distance.
I have a 2020 and replaced the OE tires with 235/50R18 V rated touring tires and now it handle’s amazingly… this should be the actual tire size on this vehicle
@@Unchainedmaple888 absolutely… they now bulge out and protect the rims … OE tire size is almost flush with the wheel … lots of room left (you could possibly put 245/50R18 on as well? …
I already have a CX-5 on the garage so it's a bit cramped and this cx30 is on the short list to replace my GTI. It's about the same size, power (turbo), and I don't have to worry about crappy roads
My only gripe with the CX30 is the lack of suspension tuning. Rear is oversprung and underdamped, which is arguably to make it more capable of carrying cargo but for everyday commuting its way too busy. That said, I love the car for all of its quirkiness as well as premium features. FWIW... I actually like the dials for infotainment control. And the Bose sound is decent (though not spectacular)
I get 26 mpg in my turbo model in mixed driving in the mountains. Regardless, I would like the option of some electrification in this vehicle. Maybe soon?
I think it’s fine. And it’s beautiful. The other cars look like ugly boxes. I would like it to be more plush, more upmarket. Then I would gladly pay $50,000 for it.
I'm not liking the new search feature within a channel especially when I just want to find alex's videos, I don't know if this was intentionally like how they are combining all the music channels to one.
Mazda talks at length about why they didn't opt for independent rear suspension on this car and Mazda 3-mostly their limited development budget as a small carmaker. Check out Savagegeese's long review of the Mazda 3 for a detailed discussion.
The beam suspension was controversial when the current Mazda 3 came out with it after the last gen had the independent rear. The CX-30 is just inheriting and hampered by that decision for the 3.
The top thing to improve in the CX-30 is fuel economy, especially with the base engine. We have a previous gen Mazda 3 with the 6 speed and rotary knob. The 6 speed is very well suited for the car. I really like the shortcut buttons music and navigation. The knob works very well, except for very specific things I don't do often, like zoom in/out, which is slightly less comfortable.
It´s a SUV and it could be a bit softer. We don´t have the turbo, just 2l sky-g and sky-x + diesel here in Europe. I drive my 2l 122 hp with about 42mpg. Overall on highways sound deadening could be also a bit better, comparing it to a BMW, Audi or Mercedes. But it´s overall a good choice.
I wish you could option the big engine in any trim. I want to go fast. I don’t need luxury. And the turbo needs to include more performance features, 215mm wide tires is a sin with that much power.
Thanks for the review. You hit it on the spot. I've own multiple Mazda's in the pass, because of the "zoom zoom" branding, and value proposition that Mazda had as the "Value Japanese BMW" choice. But passed on purchasing a cx50 and mazda 3 turbo, because I couldn't reconcile the different messages that I was getting from Mazda now. Premium and pricey, but the inferior transmission and suspension, really bothered me. Would choose the CX5 over the CX50, to get the multilink rear. Ended buying a Fluid Metal Elantra GT N line with the DCT, because it had the "zoom zoom" that Mazda gave up on, which saddens me, because I love the design direction that Mazda is going with. Mazda please fix this .... use the new 8 speed transmission and bring back the multilink rear.
This sounds like a misunderstanding, basically. If your dream car was an Elantra N Line, you need to know that Mazda is not the Zoom Zoom brand anymore. They're on the prowl for BMW customers now. Not the M customers, but the luxury-tush variety. And as Alex said, the transmission and suspension are "inferior" mostly if you're comparing up to pricey rivals.
I'm probably the only person on earth who would kill for a manual transmission on this. I'd buy it tomorrow if it had one. As it is, I'm still leaning towards it, but only because I can't find a single manual transmission AWD small crossover (or anything else small, for that matter) in existence anymore (except a Subaru WRX and I don't need a boy racer). I was ready to travel anywhere in the US to find a new 2023 manual Crosstrek (no longer available in 2024 model), but I can't find a single one of those and my enthusiasm was dampened a bit when I heard they are really sluggish. I would probably choose a Mazda 3, which DOES have a manual available, except you can't have it in the AWD version. Bastards.
A couple mechanical niggles with my Mazda brought me into the Honda dealership to test drive the CR-V. Mazda is clearly a superior product as far as comfort, ride, noise reduction, handling, and interior materials. The foam underneath the CR-V's leather is so soft, I feel the raised bolsters won't hold their shape past a couple of years. Not only do you feel imperfections on the road in the CR-V, you hear every single one of them. Also, the soft acceleration pedal is matched with an eager brake pedal. It must have be done to project responsiveness, but the airy acceleration pedal just seems inconsistent with a stiff brake.
I can't be the only one who thinks that powered seats are unnecessary. I've owned my car for almost five years. I adjusted the seat when I test drove it, before I bought it, and I haven't touched it since. If you're sharing the car, and there are memory settings, I can see how that would be convenient. Also, if you're sharing a car, make better life choices 😛
@@dippitydoinit Well, you can take the "glass half full" approach: By bundling options into only a half-dozen trim levels, the resulting production simplicity lets Mazda price them all as the best values in their classes. And mostly, they are.
I bought a Cx30 2.5S Select over the weekend. It's amazing for 25K how sophisticated this car feels. I had a rental Audi Q5 a while back and let me tell you it is not worth over twice the price of the CX30. This car IMO embarrasses everything in the class under 30K.
Some of the comments on the interior are a bit odd. Please note that my comments are based on the UK 2021 model so there are some differences. In the UK there are two versions, both 2.0L petrol, one has around 120bhp and the other around 180bhp, boosted by a small supercharger. Generally speaking, the lower powered version, the Skyactiv-G, generally has the base features and the higher powered version, the Skyactiv-X, has the extra features. Unfortunately we don't get the 2.5L option so no turbo. We have to buy the CX-5 for that engine. "Definitely remember you're looking at the most expensive version of the CX-30. We find a sunglass holder...extending sunshades on the sun visors..." - the comment initially suggests that these features are only on the most expensive version, but in the UK they're standard on all versions. And again: "...by the time you've worked your way up to the model that has (the HUD feature) it's no longer quite so inexpensive". But again, the HUD display is standard on all models, not an optional extra. In the UK we don't get a spare wheel in the boot in any version. No speakers on the front doors? So what was that right below the Bose logo? I don't think the Bose is optional, it's standard on higher trim levels but I don't think it's an option if your model only has the standard 8 speaker setup, which I believe is very good. A lot of US reviews complain about the lack of touchscreen but are completely missing the point, which is to improve safety by taking away the need to touch it and use the dial instead. It's very easy to get used to, very intuitive and not a negative point. you avoid fingerprints, one less thing to break and it's also the same depth as the main dials so your eyes don't need to adjust so much. Mazda should be applauded for this, not criticized. The wireless charging mat is an option on some models, may be standard on the top models, I'm not sure, I can't find it at all on the options list. That odd bit of trim at 11:20 houses a CD player on the UK models. The sliding centre console works better than it appears on the video and there are 2 USB ports in there if you have a larger phone. I'm not sure if the review shows a light in the glove box, one review I saw said there was none but according to the spec sheet it's standard on all UK models. Hope this helps anybody looking for this car in the UK.
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
I live in Japan and rent Mazda’s from time to time. I find the rotary knob to be a little confusing for about five minutes, and then I get used to it. And then I’m glad I’m not constantly reaching to do anything. The knob makes it much easier to do basic things while staying comfortably seated with eyes on the road.
I own one and Ive gotten used to it.
Agree with you 100 %
Bro it's just the same on any BMW. And yes it is really the simplest and efficient way to interact without risk of loosing attention. Coupled with a hud that both Mazda and BMW have, it's just great. IMO a digital touch screen has nothing to do on any car. This should be not allowed.
@@quixomega Bottom line is Mazda needs to put a touchscreen infotainment system, the rotary knob is outdated.......
Yes I agree 💯
The stuff most professional reviewers complain about is stuff the average consumer doesn't care about
So true. And the overrated stuff is shit we don’t even want.😂
@@mrgurulittle7000 I have a 2021 premium CX 30. I love it! I don't think it's underpowered. I think it's a very soft ride. The infotainment is easy to use in my opinion I don't care whether the passenger has power seats or not as long as I have it
@@tconua777 Agree.👍
@@tconua777They even bumped the power to 191hp for 2023.
@@DM72513 Yes, I did see that but I don't think a difference will be noticed
My wife and my wife bought one yesterday i love it, its such a fun car to drive and since I live in NY the size is perfect which is not too big or not to small since its just the 2 of us and a small dog. So glad i got this car.
You have 2 wives?,😅
@@ishanvyas1990 he was nervous when he typed this.
@@kilerkiss even I would be nervous if I had 2 wives 😂😂😂🙏🏽
Two wives??? BASED?!
As with just about every other Mazda…it comes down to what’s most important to you…space or personality/driving dynamics.
Get a Honda if you want space and driving dynamics. Especially the civic or accord
@@naveenthemachine Umm..neither of those competes with this. Notice you didn’t mention the HR-V which does. You don’t get both with that.
@@BrandonG8Manthe HRV has space and handling is really good like the civic. Only thing is the 0-60
@@naveenthemachine the HRV is hideous
@@bitbat9 it looks like a ford escape. But the rear end looks luxurious imo. Very Acura like. And the hrv interior is lovely. It’s as nice as a cx30
I helped my sister get a 2023 Base CX-30 S and for under $24k including destination, its unbeatable.
Wow! Great deal you got.
How did you get it that cheap
I don't see how everyone finds the infotainment so confusing, had it figured out in about 10 minutes of fiddling, and it's a huge boon to not have everything buried in a touch screen. You also still have physical media and hvac controls. As someone who hates ipad cars this control scheme is perfect.
It's the American public education system lol.
As others have said, like any Mazda, the driving experience and the driver is something that will get the priority and I can confirm these really are fun to drive. I got hooked on non-touch infotainment screens owning older Audis for years and will never go back…give it a little time and you can use a Mazda infotainment blindfolded and have the cleanest looking screen in the class. Huge reason I started working at Mazda last year, the fun and the infotainment!
Many ppl prefer to have giant tv touchscreen right on their face 😂
I agree 100% on the infotainment system. Give me dials any day. In fact, one of the reasons that I looked at the Mazda to begin with was because I didn't want a great big giant slab of glass sticking out of the dashboard and blocking my forward view. Or, mounted on the dash and in reality being too far away to reach and touch the screen anyways. It takes no time at all to get used to using the dial and the buttons on the console I can do anything I want without having to take my eyes off the road.
@@carlmontney7916 That’s a load of shit. You still have to take your eyes off the road for a second to view what’s selected on the screen. You act like the rotary knob prevents this but it absolutely doesn’t. You’re still touching something and still taking your eyes off the road. This doesn’t improve anything at all vs having a touchscreen.
@@MidwestPisces All I can say is that is your opinion. In my case I don't agree with it. As you obviously didn't agree with mine.
IDK If you're just trying to troll this or if you are actually not capable of multitasking a bit while you drive? Because I can tell you and so will many others who have used rotary controls That between the rotary knob and the steering wheel controls for the radio you don't have to take your eyes off the road anymore than you would if you were looking at your side mirrors or checking your rearview mirror.
You will end up having to take your eyes off the road a lot more when you are looking at your GPS for your next driving direction. Or even worse staring at your cell phone and texting while you're driving down the road.
@@carlmontney7916 So you go from saying how your eyes never leave the road to finally admitting that they do but it’s similar to other driving activities like checking one’s mirrors. You know what else is similar? Using a touchscreen infotainment system. The rotary knob provides no benefit at all.
This car is not conflicting!! lol, its just build right. It shows you can still build a car without 9 or 10 speed transmissions and get great gas milage and performace my 2020 CX-30's 6 speed had a little learning to do and after about 500 miles the shifts smoothed out but shifts were always very quick. The suspension is not the latest tech but its tuned and even with the skinny tires gives excellent handling in the Tenessee mountain!!. I will say I prefere the non-touch screen vs. the touch screen on my 2024 Chevy Blazer, just less destracting and very easy to use. Great review though very enjoyable to watch. You are right the change in tires realy improves handling especially the rear end, over bumps, I went with Cooper Discoverer EnduraMax as I need "some" snow traction, night and day diffrence ride is still firm but never disturbed now. I drive mine 100 miles a day, mostly highway with short trips around town. Driving to Florida and tennessee this is like riding in your own personal cacoon, love it. Keep the videos coming.
We have a 2021 CX-30 GT Turbo. I got over the rear suspension although the car can be rather jittery in the rear on rough roads. Interior it's upscale, don't mind the infotainment and the AWD system is fantastic in the snow. One of the 1st things I did is get new wheels & tires, 235/50/18 Michelin A/S 4 on new wheels transform this car. Coming from Audi/BMW/Mercedes sedans past 10 years, never though we'd have a cross over, but this was the best I tried over Honda HR-V, Hyundai Kona and Toyota CHR. Seltos and Taos both had stop sales just around the time we bought in August 2021.
Did the tire size increase mess with the speedo/odo or affect turning radius/ride quality?
I live downwind of the Great Lakes and I put 215 snows on our CX-30. If someone gets stuck, it's not the vehicle.
@@sgrant9814 No, i can't recall the exact # but is was < 1%. These wider tires in corners is where this car is transformed...handles so much better. No rubbing therefore no affect on turning radius.
I have the OE tires size for winters, also Michelin. One of the best cars I've had in the snow. Period.
Do you remember why it was better than the hr-v or the Toyota?
This makes more sense with the non-turbo. The top trim at 37K opens up the CX-5 and other competitors. We currently own a CX-9 and a Mazda 3 sedan before that. So, I’m a fan.
Yes, at $37,000 I would get a CX-50 without the turbo.
I went to a car “show” of sorts at a local mall a few months ago. I got into a CX-90, and sat in it. I had just finished a lease of the RDX (2021), and I felt that the Mazda was more “premium” and comfortable on the inside.
I think Mazda has successfully gotten into that premium/luxury bracket even if people haven’t quite noticed yet.
@@tedunguent156 I think it's personal preference? I'd prefer to drive smaller cars, and the CX-30 turbo is the best car you can get in the small suv range without going luxury..
yessss the CX-9 is so underrated 😩
Mazda has really stepped up their game. I just bought a CX-30 for my 20 yr. old daughter and she just loves the car. We looked at all the competition.
My wife bought a top trim version of the CX-30 with the normally aspirated 2.5 engine. You won't mistake it for a sports car, but it is fun to drive and has more than adequate power. The really good news is that in the year we have had it, it has achieved an average of 8 liters of fuel per 100 km (29.4 MPG US). That is the combined average. It gets around 34 MPG US on a highway trip. With the higher MSRP, mediocre gas mileage, and extra parts to potentially fail for the turbo version, I think the normally aspirated one is the best bet. However, if you like to light the tires up, well you do you.
I sold wife's 2012 Versa for $5000 and bought a Base model 2023 CX-30 and paid $19,000 (with the money down from her Versa). As he states @ 27:15 the "base model" is the bargain - so True. We have owned it now for 6 months (5,100 miles) - trouble free. Some of the things we like are: The price and it's all wheel drive! I live in the desert of Arizona but downhill ski at the 3 ski resorts in AZ & two in southern Colorado so the All-Wheel-Drive is a plus. I personally like that it still has a real transmission, no CVT. The info/radio dial (took a couple days to become familiar) but we like it because you don't have to take your eyes off the road to use it. The driving lights are very bright at night. The only dislike would be maybe the seats. If you are over-weight you probably won't like them.
Thanks Alex, I just bought a 2023 CX-30 Turbo Premium today, and in the same exact colors (inside and out) that you test drove. Your review has given me reassurance that I made the right choice. I bought it as a certified pre-owned vehicle for slightly less than $30K, thousands less than when it was brand new, and it only has 6k miles. Coming from owning a Caddy ATS with a 2.0L Turbo, I felt tired of driving sedans and sprung for one of these, obviously in a turbo because settling for a regular 2.5L would probably have been a disappointment.
I love Mazdas infotainment. I hate fingerprints on the screen and if you sit very far back, it's always a reach to even touch it anyways. Great review as always though, always super informative and in depth! 😊
Short arms?
@mrjamesryan333 😂 I didn't even think about ones arm length. That probably affects it, too though lmao!
@pine307 I have zero issues using android auto with my dial..... im sure it comes down to user preference
@@tylerharvey8299 i assume you use a flip cellphone? Touchscreen is the right move Mazda.........
@crow_2k11beatsbydre8 how did you know i use a flip phone? I love my Z Fold5 😂😂😂 but I still hate fingerprints on my car radio. So I like my dial 👌🏼 to each their own I suppose
I’ve had a 2024 CX30 for about a month now and 1k miles and I LOVE IT! It’s absolutely a great deal at any price point
I love the headlights the turn with the steering wheel. I owned a Mazda with that feature and was picking up my girlfriend at the BMW dealer. I started my car and my headlights swiveled on startup as a quick self check. The BMW salesman noticed and told me I had a really nice car!
People always complain about the transmission only having 6 gears vs 8 or even 10 gears. The additional gears dont necessarily mean a better final drive ratio. With all the torque of the Mazda 2.5 engine, you dont need a trans that needs those additional gears to keep the RPM in the sweet spot. BTW spirited driving for a week and then complaining about MPG really isnt a fair comparison. I'm averaging more than 24 MPG in city driving over the 1800 miles my car currently has.
I love my 2022 CX-30 Carbon Edition (non-turbo 2.5L engine), but I did have to black-out the front/side silver trim, roof rails & more to make that black cladding palatable for me. 18 months in thus far & have been 100% problem/issue free. It's the best crossover in this size/price segment for the USA/NA market IMO. It rides & handles nicely & has a quiet, insulated cabin. Also, no crappy belt/chain design CVT on the CX-30. But, not a fan of how the main projector headlights are used as the DRL (which I can turn off via the system settings in the USA, at least). I've come to prefer Mazda over Toyota or Honda these days (as far as ICE vehicles are concerned). I average 31-32 MPG in my non-turbo CX-30, & that is almost all around-town suburban errand running driving, not open HW miles. The 186/191hp non-turbo 2.5L engine is plenty peppy IMO, & I found the turbo to be overkill (at the expense of MPG) for my driving needs & style.
Agree with you! I’m looking at the base version too. The hybrid swarm is pulling me too…though I prefer the simple & tried base CX30.
Thank you sir. A real, comprehensive review of this vehicle. Amateurs should not post "review" videos, they are infuriating for any serious buyer.
Great review but I wish you had reviewed a model with the base engine. Most buyers will choose the lower trims with the base engine so I'm tired of reviewers all reviewing the CX-30 Turbo.
Me too! Sadly Mazda didn't have one for us to test
@@AAutoBuyersGuide fair enough and thanks for replying Alex!
@@AAutoBuyersGuideI bought a new, naturally aspirated CX30 last December (a ‘22 model). Never once have I felt that it needed more power. It doesn’t scorch the pavement with sub 6 second acceleration numbers, but it has more than enough power for any driving situation to give the driver plenty of confidence. The gas tank is small, which has taken some getting used to, but I’m getting 28-29 MPG mixed driving. I love my CX-30 - it’s my first Mazda. Annoyed it doesn’t have heated side mirrors, but it’s as quiet & comfortable to me as the Chrysler Pacifica it replaced. If a crossover still fits my needs in four to five years I’d likely go for the CX-50, but if rear seat interior room is not an issue then save the extra cost and go for the CX-30. It’s a satisfying drive and punches above its weight in almost every area.
@@KMS5280 I'm with you. I picked up a 2023 Carbon Edition in February. The NA engine is more than adequate and is downright fun on winding VT mountain roads in sport mode. I'm sitting around 30mpg in mixed, my highway trips have been around 35mpg.
The base model is quite good. Instead of relying on reviewers too much, if there is a dealership near you, test drive both.
The infotainment is actually quite good I really like it, very easy to use you will get used to it really fast.
Great car if you like to drive a sporty car.
Really enjoyed your review! I purchased a 2023 CX-30 Carbon Edition in January. I passed on the Turbo model even after the “powerful” test drive. It might have been a different story if the turbo had a six speed manual and better rear suspension. I really enjoy the NA engine even with the current 6 speed auto. The ride is certainly better since ditching the stock tires in favor of Michelin Cross-Climate2s. For me this model has been much more of a fun drive than my previous underpowered CVT Crosstrek.
I appreciate that you share numbers for the car that you review and its competitors.
I just bought one after Thanksgiving. Got the Carbon Edition 2023. It feels like a luxury vehicle. Pretty awesome coming from a used 2011 Nissan sentra lol.
Regarding gas mileage per gallon, I have a 2018 Mazda6 GT which has the same motor as the turbo version of this vehicle, but not AWD. Driving on the highway at 75mph in the northeast in the summer, I can achieve 33-35mpg on the highway easily. Off highway, I get 30 mpg. Not sure how hard reviewers drive their vehicles to get such low values, but I would guess that when you own the vehicle and drive it normally, the mpg numbers are significantly higher than when they are flogged. My wife and I drove a CX-50 and the CX-30 and the CX-50 IS STIFF. The CX-30 was quiet and very well composed on Northeast roads. The overall impression of this vehicle is that of relatively high quality, quiet ride, with fantastic driver dynamics. Next up in our test drive for her is the CX-5. We want to replace her 2014 CX-9 within the next year. Might wait to see what is up with the CX-70.
Price and no independent rear suspension is why I went with the CX5 Carbon Turbo for $32k.
Excellent point on the limitations of the 6 speed. Anything above 70 mph, your MPGs really take a dive. Around town, the turbo get around 19mpg.
Howd u get a carbon turbo for that price?
@@ChicagoBulls1984 2021, before all the non sense. Seems like the they don’t offer the carbon in turbo anymore.
Nice review. I'm currently driving a 2023 Mazda CX-50 Preferred Plus. This is my fourth Mazda, following a 2016 Mazda3 hatchback, a 2018 CX-5 AWD, and a 2020 CX-5 FWD. Regarding AWD in Florida, when I moved down here in 2018 I was driving the 2018 CX-5 AWD. In June 2020 I leased the 2020 CX-5 FWD, figuring that traction control would be fine instead of AWD. I was wrong. AWD is superior to traction control, at least as far as Mazda is concerned. The CX-50 is AWD, as are all current Mazda crossovers, and I like having AWD again.
As for why Mazda left out some features in the CX-30, I think that it may be because Mazda didn't want the CX-30 to compete too much with the CX-5 and CX-50. I test drove a 2020 CX-30 and found it too small inside compared with the CX-5, and for the price difference between the two models, similarly equipped, I felt that the CX-5 was the better value.
I'm sorry, but that's nonsense. Unless you are breaking traction or pushing a vehicle hard and nearing its limits, there is no discernable difference between AWD and FWD on dry and wet roads in normal driving. If I can drive a RWD truck with a light rear end, no traction control, and 242hp on wet Florida roads, I think the average person can manage just fine with FWD if they simply drove decently. It sounds like you're leasing vehicles since you have a new one every 2-3yrs, so you're not having to deal with the disadvantages of owning an AWD vehicle long term. Tires always have to be replaced all 4 at a time, otherwise, it puts extra strain on your AWD components and wears things out faster. Plus, you just have the extra components to maintain and replace over time. I don't know why some people insist on making car ownership a more troublesome and costly experience.
@@palebeachbum I found that on wet pavement accelerating from a stop with the FWD CX-5 I had more slippage then with the AWD version. Also, when pulling out from my development I had to make a left turn. No traffic light, so I had to accelerate quickly to get into the flow of traffic (two lanes each way). With the FWD I would squeal the tires every time, but never with the AWD.
@@stuartaaron613 yikes, that sounds pretty dangerous. If traffic is that heavy on the road you're pull onto they really should put up a traffic light. People shouldn't have to spin tires pulling out just to avoid an accident.
@@palebeachbum The developments on each sie get a flashing red light, while the main road gets a flashing amber. Fat lot of good it does. And yes, there have been accidents there over the years, but the authorities won't do anything about it.
I'm sure that one reason the Mazda (any Mazda) might not sell very well in your area is because there are a limited number of dealerships. I happen to have a Mazda dealer within a mile of my home but the next nearest one is at least 30 miles away.
Thats not bad. Im in western colorado. There isnt a Mazda dealer witjin 250 miles either direction. Had to go to Denver to get mine
@@johnattonito948 That's what I mean. I'm in western CT and WHY would you buy a car so far from a dealer? How do you get it serviced at a dealership?
@@tedunguent156 Mazda is very popular in eastern Canada, there are 3 dealerships in my city alone. AWD is not a luxury for the winters over there and now all their SUVs have it at all trim levels.
I have the Turbo and we get 26 MPG combined. Our 5th Mazda. Its a brilliant car. Can't wait to upgrade the tires.
I have a 2021 CX-30 Turbo Premium Plus. Fun to drive, but certain things that disappoint. The heads up windshield display. Great feature if it has all of the essential information you need, but it doesn't, which forces you to divide your attention between the windshield display and the dashboard instrument cluster. Defeats the whole purpose. At a minimum add the turn signals and transmission mode (auto or manual) and it would clearly be better. The tiny cup holder hidden behind the shift lever is a total waste. I want something that will hold a real coffee cup, that I can safely and comfortable reach. for those long commutes. I realize that would require a complete rearrangement of the center console. Do it. The ergonomics of the switches falls well short of a thoughtful ergonomic design, in particular the controls on the steering wheel. Cramming a bunch of tiny switches together with insufficient size and spatial separation is not ergonomic. It's a little disappointing that the same attention to details when it comes to driving dynamics has not been appled to the interior switches and controls. The little things make a big difference, and speaking of little things, the 12 gallon gas tank... I hate having to fuel up as often as I do, but I guess that's as large of a tank as could be fit into it.
I understand the "turbo-hunger" for power, as most people counting horses before buying, but after 6 years living iwth a turbo car, I opted for the non turbo, specifically , because I like the extra gas mileage and less worries.
People reading and undecided, trust me. The 190-ish HP from the naturally aspirated is plenty! You still get a powerful car, some other cars with turbos make about 200hp and you are nearly there, without one!
You also get ..more...reliability...with the non turbo ones. Trust me, turbo cars with more HP can be exciting yes, but they are also something in the back of your mind, because they can also be a ticking time bomb. If you commute a lot, go for the non turbo. Take it from a former turbo-crazed driver. The gas mileage adds up quickly!
Thank you I’ve been so on the fence about going with the turbo or not.
In Europe we get a 2.0 NA engine with 186 horse power as the top spec engine, the fuel economy is averaging 6L/100 km in my case which is fantastic for an engine of this size and power, it's specially good to have it in manual, because playing with the gears is what really makes this a fun car. I always look back at it after I get out because is just gorgeous.
MSRP for a canadian top of the line turbo is 28,000 USD. This is a such a sneaky deal that I'm not surprised that this isn't mentioned anywhere.
For a little more coin get the CX 5. The CX-30 is great but very tight inside. Plus, the CX5 is more of a comfortable ride. Still, compared to the others on the list I would easily choose the Mazda.
@autobuyersguide there’s a clear speaker grill on the leading edge of the door pull at 10:32 mark.
I was referring to the larger base speakers but tripped over my tongue. There's a larger speaker in the cowl/footwell area rather than in the door.
@@AAutoBuyersGuide ihhs and ncap crash score is showing its very similar to the best scores for lot less money and weight (less dangerious to others, less oradwear, less tire wear brake wear etc) . checked out some but engine shakes when idling especially when air codnitioning is on especially at full AC power... maybe the shaking over the years will lead to loosening connection between engine and car structure? maybe it can be fixed for cheap? honda crv , old lexus etc did not shake as such. disappointing
the lower trims are a bargain, also it's very reliable even long term
I own one of these ('21 premium n/a) soul red/white. Initially i was put off by the infotainment system but now two yrs later i love it and prefer it over the touch screen in my honda. An additional benefit is no fingerprints. I do wish the glove box were bigger snd a bin style,,,,this slot one is too darn small. For fuel econ my 2 and a half year total avg is 32.5 and i have gotten 35-36 all hwy at 65-75 mph
Yep on the MPG. I'm not sure what Alex was smoking (maybe the tires) but it was comical to read and watch is D for fuel mileage.
Love the graphics comparing the other vehicles!
Alex, I think you pinpointed the CX-30s numerous shortcomings with aplomb. 😉
Mazda's are outdated when it comes to driver assist features. I don't know why most reviewers don't focus on driver assist capabilities. This is the main reason I would buy a new car. Mazda's driver assist only works when cruise control is on, while some competition works at any speed. That makes the competition so much more relaxing and easier to drive day to day.
No the greatest shortcoming is the pitiful Drivers seat........Worst chair I have sat upon in 80 Years.....Paul
@@paulholterhaus7084 Felt pretty decent to me. Are you sure it would've been the worst chair you've sat upon in only 70 years? I suspect your butt may be a bit recalibrated.
I love the blind spot warning on head up display. It's a great feature
The best auto reviews on the you tubes, or anywhere else
You're driving that 30 hard! I'm getting 30 mpgs in my 23 turbo 5 with mixed driving conditions, including spirited. I definitely enjoy the turbo so I'm confused as why your mileage is so low.
Great review, thanks so much. I'm seriously thinking of getting one for my wife. Unfortunately, I drive her car (Subaru Forester) from time to time and the CVT drives me crazy. At its price point, the Mazda seems like the only option.
I've always been conflicted about this car too. I loved it when it came out, now I'm not sure. I wish there was a hybrid version, and of course the cladding was a little more restrained. I don't really need or want AWD, and I was disappointed when Mazda took away the choice. I'm curious to see how/if the next generation evolves. More MPG would be nice, and I don't really care about the rear seat room since I rarely have more than 1 passenger. I rode in a Corolla Cross a few weeks ago and it was just so drab and depressing, that it's probably off my list- especially for the dealer markups right now.
Interesting to see no Taos represented in the competitive set. Semi-premium, solid warranty and priced closely.
Taos looks great and seems like a compelling package, but then the reliability and repair costs remind you it's a VW and you should have bought something else.
Great review Alex.
I have the 2024 CX30 2.5 S premium it is an absolute joy to drive and it handles great but there are some things that I just don't understand what Mazda's thinking was.
Namely, why do you put a rear view camera on there but you don't also include an audible backup warning? That makes no sense considering that even my cheapy 2014 Kia Sportage had an audible warning when you were backing up. Granted, you're supposed to be paying attention when you back up and not looking around but sometimes you can get distracted by movements in front of or off to the side of your vehicle when you're backing up especially in a crowded parking lot That's when an audible warning is needed.
The other thing is the clunky way you have to enter an address into the navigation system using that rotary dial can take forever. And using the voice activation to speak and address into the navigation system is hit or miss. Now you can use the app on your phone and go in there and find the address and send it to your car but it's still kind of clunky all the way around. I know you can use Android Auto or Apple's car play and then use your phone's navigation system but I don't like that as much as I do the larger screen when I use the built-in nav system. I also like that the heads up display gives you the street names and the turns while using the stock navigation system. I'm also not a fan of the small gas tank IDK Maybe they had to do that to fit it in since it has an axle and drive unit in the rear too. It shouldn't be a problem for me as 90% of my driving is going to be around town anyways but hopefully on a long trip I won't spend more time stopping for gas than I will actually drive in and getting to my destination.
Now, all that said. It's a great vehicle for the money It looks good it handles well It's got enough power and overall I'm happy with it. In the end isn't that what matters? That we're happy with what we bought.
I have owned mine less than a month so I'm still in the honeymoon stage. However,after the first week I already knew that it was a vehicle that I was going to be able to be happy with long term.
I'd really like to see a (standard, non-plug-in) hybrid version (rather than turbo - although offering both would be fine). Mazda's line up is lacking for hybrids - it's only got the Tank Plug In (CX-90). Their electric MX-30 leaves a lot to be desired, in comparison to competitors.
I saw that in UK they have what they call 'mild hybrid', like our non-plugin hybrids, I got jealous of their 4.9 L/100 km >> ~55 mpg
test drove one. Liked it a lot but prefer more/better visibility,
10:45 There is no need for a touchscreen as it is unsafe and uncomfortable to lean over a screen while driving. Touchscreens should have never been allowed in cars in the first place.
Totally agree!👍
Jan 1st I'm being a Carbon CX30! I can't wait for the new year to be here !
Before buying my CX30 (2023) I tested and compared it with the Toyota Yaris Cross, the Suzuki S-Cross, and the Mazda 3.
Obviously I liked the CX-30 more.
Solid review. Well done!
First time I’ve heard mention of the turbo engine being more sensitive to air temperature than fuel type 🤔 I’ll have to test that out with my CX-5 turbo.
Alex never disappoints
The OEm tires might be fitting for the base model, but it really should have better tires for the turbo version and higher trims. The OEM tires seems good for gas mileage and treadwear. Better tires can improve on tire noise, comfort, lateral g's, and braking distance.
I love my CX30 not too big compare to most SUV out there.
That was an excellent review. The only thing I wish you would have done is shown the back seats folded down. With the cubic feet.
I have a 2020 and replaced the OE tires with 235/50R18 V rated touring tires and now it handle’s amazingly… this should be the actual tire size on this vehicle
Did the stock rims accommodate 235 width tires?
@@Unchainedmaple888 absolutely… they now bulge out and protect the rims … OE tire size is almost flush with the wheel … lots of room left (you could possibly put 245/50R18 on as well? …
11.19
this is for cd input. In some markets it was available.
And also, thank you for the thorough reviews, real detail and proper comparisons.
I just test drove one, I loved it!
I already have a CX-5 on the garage so it's a bit cramped and this cx30 is on the short list to replace my GTI.
It's about the same size, power (turbo), and I don't have to worry about crappy roads
My only gripe with the CX30 is the lack of suspension tuning. Rear is oversprung and underdamped, which is arguably to make it more capable of carrying cargo but for everyday commuting its way too busy. That said, I love the car for all of its quirkiness as well as premium features. FWIW... I actually like the dials for infotainment control. And the Bose sound is decent (though not spectacular)
You are my favorite car reviewer.
Thank you for the presentation 👍
I am currently cross-shopping this car new versus a slightly used XC40. For a similar price tag, which would you recommend?
Mazda for reliability. Volvo is good for 3-5years then all the electrical gremlins surface.
Enjoyed the clip. Wish Mazda had better seat control for both on the Premium package and touch screen...
I get 26 mpg in my turbo model in mixed driving in the mountains. Regardless, I would like the option of some electrification in this vehicle. Maybe soon?
You won't get it in this vehicle-maybe a future hybrid at most.
What are the RPMs in the base engine on the highway with the 6 speed auto?
Very Nice car, fast and refined, reliable. However it needs a larger gas tank.
Would the base non turbo 2.5L engine be more fuel efficient?
There is a speaker on the front door , I'm looking right at it .
I think it’s fine. And it’s beautiful. The other cars look like ugly boxes. I would like it to be more plush, more upmarket. Then I would gladly pay $50,000 for it.
I looked up the most problems with the Mazda cx 30 it was oil consumption problems have they fixed this issue???
I'm not liking the new search feature within a channel especially when I just want to find alex's videos, I don't know if this was intentionally like how they are combining all the music channels to one.
I BOUGHT A CX30 AND I LOVE IT... END OF STORY.
I love my CX-30, but it could really use an independent rear suspension because certain types of terrain upset it.
Mazda talks at length about why they didn't opt for independent rear suspension on this car and Mazda 3-mostly their limited development budget as a small carmaker. Check out Savagegeese's long review of the Mazda 3 for a detailed discussion.
Does this have lane centering? You mention a button for lane centering at 13:18 but I'm not sure if you're referring to lane keep or lane departure.
The beam suspension was controversial when the current Mazda 3 came out with it after the last gen had the independent rear. The CX-30 is just inheriting and hampered by that decision for the 3.
The top thing to improve in the CX-30 is fuel economy, especially with the base engine.
We have a previous gen Mazda 3 with the 6 speed and rotary knob. The 6 speed is very well suited for the car. I really like the shortcut buttons music and navigation. The knob works very well, except for very specific things I don't do often, like zoom in/out, which is slightly less comfortable.
It´s a SUV and it could be a bit softer. We don´t have the turbo, just 2l sky-g and sky-x + diesel here in Europe. I drive my 2l 122 hp with about 42mpg. Overall on highways sound deadening could be also a bit better, comparing it to a BMW, Audi or Mercedes. But it´s overall a good choice.
I wish you could option the big engine in any trim. I want to go fast. I don’t need luxury. And the turbo needs to include more performance features, 215mm wide tires is a sin with that much power.
I tried the cx30 and sadly hated the interior and visibility. I picked the Crosstrek which I liked a lot more except for the higher price.
Thanks for the review. You hit it on the spot. I've own multiple Mazda's in the pass, because of the "zoom zoom" branding, and value proposition that Mazda had as the "Value Japanese BMW" choice. But passed on purchasing a cx50 and mazda 3 turbo, because I couldn't reconcile the different messages that I was getting from Mazda now. Premium and pricey, but the inferior transmission and suspension, really bothered me. Would choose the CX5 over the CX50, to get the multilink rear. Ended buying a Fluid Metal Elantra GT N line with the DCT, because it had the "zoom zoom" that Mazda gave up on, which saddens me, because I love the design direction that Mazda is going with. Mazda please fix this .... use the new 8 speed transmission and bring back the multilink rear.
So true. I wanted to love it but that torsion rear end said no.
This sounds like a misunderstanding, basically. If your dream car was an Elantra N Line, you need to know that Mazda is not the Zoom Zoom brand anymore. They're on the prowl for BMW customers now. Not the M customers, but the luxury-tush variety. And as Alex said, the transmission and suspension are "inferior" mostly if you're comparing up to pricey rivals.
I like this car.👍
I'm probably the only person on earth who would kill for a manual transmission on this. I'd buy it tomorrow if it had one. As it is, I'm still leaning towards it, but only because I can't find a single manual transmission AWD small crossover (or anything else small, for that matter) in existence anymore (except a Subaru WRX and I don't need a boy racer). I was ready to travel anywhere in the US to find a new 2023 manual Crosstrek (no longer available in 2024 model), but I can't find a single one of those and my enthusiasm was dampened a bit when I heard they are really sluggish. I would probably choose a Mazda 3, which DOES have a manual available, except you can't have it in the AWD version. Bastards.
I really want to like it. But that huge plastics wheel Arch.. I just don't get it why??
A couple mechanical niggles with my Mazda brought me into the Honda dealership to test drive the CR-V. Mazda is clearly a superior product as far as comfort, ride, noise reduction, handling, and interior materials. The foam underneath the CR-V's leather is so soft, I feel the raised bolsters won't hold their shape past a couple of years. Not only do you feel imperfections on the road in the CR-V, you hear every single one of them. Also, the soft acceleration pedal is matched with an eager brake pedal. It must have be done to project responsiveness, but the airy acceleration pedal just seems inconsistent with a stiff brake.
That was an apples to oranges comparison. Mazda's direct competitor to the CR-V is the CX-5, which is larger and costiler than the CX-30.
I can't be the only one who thinks that powered seats are unnecessary.
I've owned my car for almost five years. I adjusted the seat when I test drove it, before I bought it, and I haven't touched it since.
If you're sharing the car, and there are memory settings, I can see how that would be convenient. Also, if you're sharing a car, make better life choices 😛
You're why they make the base model. You can glory in the reward your prudence brings you that you also get to keep more of your money!
Maybe. I still don't want the base engine though so I'm forced to purchase other nonsense as well. @@tonysterbenc
@@dippitydoinit Well, you can take the "glass half full" approach: By bundling options into only a half-dozen trim levels, the resulting production simplicity lets Mazda price them all as the best values in their classes. And mostly, they are.
I don't understand why they don't make the plastic look better instead having a plain same size plastic from front to back
Things like new suspension, bigger tires, more gears in transmission will definitely raise the price of the vehicle
The taillights whisper Jaguar just a wee tiny bit.
I bought a Cx30 2.5S Select over the weekend. It's amazing for 25K how sophisticated this car feels. I had a rental Audi Q5 a while back and let me tell you it is not worth over twice the price of the CX30. This car IMO embarrasses everything in the class under 30K.
I like it but not with the fuel economy (Mazda need to sort that out!)
Some of the comments on the interior are a bit odd. Please note that my comments are based on the UK 2021 model so there are some differences.
In the UK there are two versions, both 2.0L petrol, one has around 120bhp and the other around 180bhp, boosted by a small supercharger. Generally speaking, the lower powered version, the Skyactiv-G, generally has the base features and the higher powered version, the Skyactiv-X, has the extra features. Unfortunately we don't get the 2.5L option so no turbo. We have to buy the CX-5 for that engine.
"Definitely remember you're looking at the most expensive version of the CX-30. We find a sunglass holder...extending sunshades on the sun visors..." - the comment initially suggests that these features are only on the most expensive version, but in the UK they're standard on all versions.
And again: "...by the time you've worked your way up to the model that has (the HUD feature) it's no longer quite so inexpensive". But again, the HUD display is standard on all models, not an optional extra.
In the UK we don't get a spare wheel in the boot in any version.
No speakers on the front doors? So what was that right below the Bose logo? I don't think the Bose is optional, it's standard on higher trim levels but I don't think it's an option if your model only has the standard 8 speaker setup, which I believe is very good.
A lot of US reviews complain about the lack of touchscreen but are completely missing the point, which is to improve safety by taking away the need to touch it and use the dial instead. It's very easy to get used to, very intuitive and not a negative point. you avoid fingerprints, one less thing to break and it's also the same depth as the main dials so your eyes don't need to adjust so much. Mazda should be applauded for this, not criticized.
The wireless charging mat is an option on some models, may be standard on the top models, I'm not sure, I can't find it at all on the options list.
That odd bit of trim at 11:20 houses a CD player on the UK models.
The sliding centre console works better than it appears on the video and there are 2 USB ports in there if you have a larger phone.
I'm not sure if the review shows a light in the glove box, one review I saw said there was none but according to the spec sheet it's standard on all UK models. Hope this helps anybody looking for this car in the UK.
Rica etsem altyazılardaki otomatik çeviri seçeneklerine Türkçe dil seçeneği ekleyebilir misiniz ? Sizi anlamak ve takip etmek istiyorum !!!
So sick💯🔥
I think I'm more of a cx5 type. The cx30 seems a bit too small and it also has a small furl tank given the poor mpg.
The mpg isnt poor. I have a 2023 turbo premium and average 29 mpg
Seems like a great deal honestly!!