Rolex Explorer vs Omega Speedmaster | Clash of The Icons

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 бер 2020
  • Detailed Explorer review: • Rolex Explorer: Everyt...
    Detailed Speedmaster review: • Long Term Review Omega...
    The Omega Speedmaster and the Rolex Explorer are both steel sportswatches that have a background in exploration. One having gone to the Moon, the other to Mount Everest. Both are iconic watches within their own brands and both are often on the radar of the same watch collecting audience. Both of these watches are absolutely fantastic. Bang for buck, the Speedy wins this, but overall, there is no denying, the Explorer wins the battle.
    If you enjoy this content, let us know by subscribing?

КОМЕНТАРІ • 218

  • @watchcollectingstrategy
    @watchcollectingstrategy 4 роки тому +15

    Keep up the great work my friend! Your editing skills are incredible.

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому

      Watch Collecting Strategy thanks a lot sir! Greatly appreciate the kind feedback 🙏

  • @SgtHooch
    @SgtHooch 3 роки тому +23

    This would be a quintessential 2-watch collection.

  • @Harvind89
    @Harvind89 4 роки тому +16

    I can't even begin to imagine the amount of work you put into this behind the scenes. Absolutely love the editing, fantastic video!

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому +2

      thanks a lot, I very much appreciate reading this feedback! Worth the effort then! :-D

  • @alfredfrome9455
    @alfredfrome9455 4 роки тому +6

    Thank you for a great video, very entertaining and much appreciated, particularly at this time.

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому

      Thank you also for the encouraging feedback, equally appreciated at this time!! 🙏 Stay safe

  • @ronin7106
    @ronin7106 3 роки тому +1

    Great review! Love the review approach and concept. Informative, yet very amusing.

    • @degriff
      @degriff  3 роки тому

      Thanks a lot Ronin! Great to read 🙏

  • @josegoncalves6271
    @josegoncalves6271 4 роки тому +12

    I love both !! congratulations ,excellent review. Greetings from Portugal .

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому

      Thanks a lot Jose! A wonderful duo. I find it hard to find a good excuse to add a third to that duo (i find em - but it is hard ;-))

  • @kyleredshaw693
    @kyleredshaw693 4 роки тому +8

    Super stoked that you did a video of these two watches. They are my favourites (would never sell either as well) and love that you have them all over your site in different strap combos. I agree with your analysis of the two and also that the speedy works best on a strap. I miss my speedy as it is getting serviced and due to the pandemic wont see it for a while. Keep up the great work and excellent video!

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому

      Great reading you here Kyle!!! Thanks a lot for the wonderful feedback. I hope you get that Speedy back soon. Stay safe over there and talk soon! 👍

  • @stevomcgee
    @stevomcgee 4 роки тому +5

    Great matchup and video!

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому +1

      Hey Steve, great to see you here!!! Thanks a lot sir, much appreciated

  • @MrMooseful
    @MrMooseful 4 роки тому +48

    Speedy is far more legendary I'd say, but the Explorer is clearly the superior watch here! What a fantastic - extraordinary - video, thank you!

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому +3

      It is difficult to beat that whole Moon story hehe :-) Thanks a lot for the positive feedback!

    • @wchingfong
      @wchingfong 4 роки тому

      maybe should add History session, or maybe resell value

    • @phmwu7368
      @phmwu7368 4 роки тому

      @@degriff More different Rolex types watches (8) have been flown in space than Omega types (5) #MoonwatchUniverse

    • @atl3630
      @atl3630 4 роки тому

      Wong C.F Keith both have excellent resale value.

  • @Bianuni
    @Bianuni 4 роки тому +1

    Another awesome video 👏🏼 keep up the good work 👍🏼👌🏼

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому +1

      Thank you very much for the encouraging words! :-)

  • @Milofchg
    @Milofchg 4 роки тому +30

    The Speedmaster weakness is the bracelet clasp. The Explorer is arguably more versatile, but ONLY on the bracelet. The Speedy on the other hand, is versatile, maybe more, depending on how you wear it. If you put an crocodile leather strap on the Speedy. It out dresses the Explorer. The Explorer doesn’t look as refined on anything else as it does with the bracelet. The Explorer is meant to wear the Ouster bracelet. As for the Speedmaster, it can wear a NATO, high end leather straps, vintage leather straps, it’s own bracelet. You get a different watch when you change the Speedmaster. Also you can put different generations of Speedmaster bracelets on any Speedmaster. With the right combination of solid end links and solid link vintage bracelets (especially the tapered 20-16mm) The Speedy looks even better. I love the Explorer but the 36mm wears much better and looks just as vintage as a modern Speedmaster. It’s a very tough comparison. I own both a Speedy and a 36mm Explorer. These are the perfect 2 watch collection. Both fly under the radar and go with any style and occasion. I say buy both! You can get an Explorer for $5-$6k and a modern Speedy mint for $3500-$4k

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому +4

      The bracelet clasp and also the bracelet if you ask me. It is in dire need of an upgrade/change I'd say. You are absolutely right that on the strap the Speedy takes the cake. Also indeed strangely enough the older bracelets are (much) better looking than the current one.. For the Explorer, I looked at the 39mm vs 36mm for a long time, ultimately I went for the 39mm but it was not an easy decision! I agree with your approach - go for both ;-) Thanks a lot for your comment and feedback, always nice to hear a nicely worded opinion!

    • @turvyjj9232
      @turvyjj9232 3 роки тому +1

      I don't think you can get the Explorer 36mm, hesalite, 1016 for 5-6k$. And that's the one comparable to the Speedy.

    • @Milofchg
      @Milofchg 3 роки тому

      @@turvyjj9232 $5-$6K for a 1016, definitely no way. Plus $15k for a poor example plus $20k for a good condition 1016. I personally don't care for the 1016, but I can see why many collectors like the 1016.

    • @turvyjj9232
      @turvyjj9232 3 роки тому

      @@Milofchg I think the 1016 is the nicest Explorer by far. More subdued and elegant, less shiny and blingy. It has something in common with the Speedmaster hesalite version. Shiny watches are discordant with real character, to say something.

  • @mkyhou1160
    @mkyhou1160 4 роки тому +15

    I have the Explorer - love it, so versatile as it covers dress and casual. My other watch is a Tudor BB GMT Pepsi, which is also a versatile beast, a little more casual (still fine in a board room), more presence / tool like (Ie a lot thicker) and a full diver. Great video, and a nice combo.

    • @hutchman0823
      @hutchman0823 3 роки тому

      i have the rolex milguass and just ordered the GMT pepsi. I am strongly considering picking up the explorer. Are you satisfied with the explorer?

    • @mkyhou1160
      @mkyhou1160 3 роки тому

      @@hutchman0823 just sold it - I now have Air King, Zenith El Primero and the BB GMT. Over time I found explorer was a bit small for me. Depending on your wrist size, you might prefer your Milgaus.

  • @teslakiteable
    @teslakiteable 4 роки тому +37

    This video is on an entirely new level. Holy crap.

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому +2

      Haha thanks so much, really great to read!! 🙏🥂

  • @fugitive88888
    @fugitive88888 3 роки тому +1

    Wow discovered your channel great content subscribed

    • @degriff
      @degriff  3 роки тому +1

      Thanks a lot, truly appreciate it and a pleasure to read!

  • @MrLukeeld
    @MrLukeeld 4 роки тому +1

    Really enjoyed review. I love your presentation style with the cool graphics. Thanks 👍😊

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому +1

      luke eldridge thanks a lot for the feedback and for watching Luke! Much appreciated 🙌

  • @REYMANK7
    @REYMANK7 3 роки тому +1

    Really nice content. You got a new subscriber today 👍🏽

    • @degriff
      @degriff  3 роки тому

      Thank you very much Anish! Very nice to hear and much appreciated 🙏

  • @kadams842
    @kadams842 4 роки тому +1

    Beautiful video. Please keep doing these. They are gorgeous

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому

      K Adams thanks a lot K! Will do for sure :-) Stay safe 🙏

  • @mannycalavera2335
    @mannycalavera2335 4 роки тому +5

    Both really great as everyday watches. I own and love them both and both were intended as casual kind of low-key every day watches. I wear the Speedmaster more because I think the design is just a little bit more interesting.

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому +1

      Manny Calavera i can’t say I’m any different :-) Well said 👍

  • @scotdoc
    @scotdoc 4 роки тому +1

    Great video. I have 3 Speedies and also a Rolex Datejust 42. All fabulous watches. Steel bezel on the Rolex scratches very badly (and that’s just wearing it for work in an office job). Something to bear in mind. Can of course be polished if you don’t mind that. I love the waterproof properties of the Rolex, although bear in mind you should have it pressure tested annually if you plan to swim whilst wearing it.

  • @Greg-rq1yx
    @Greg-rq1yx 4 роки тому +6

    I own both as well and ❤️ each of them equally. Each gives me a deeper appreciation for the other.

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому

      Very well put, I feel exactly the same way!

  • @kevinl1608
    @kevinl1608 3 роки тому +2

    One Question why did you not go over function..for instance the stop watch/ chrono function of the omega? You had the chrono second hand going like the Rolex but that is not the normal mode.... very confusing

  • @bo0bo07
    @bo0bo07 3 роки тому

    love the format of this video 2 minutes in and subscribed

    • @degriff
      @degriff  3 роки тому

      Thanks a lot Louie! Much appreciated 🙏

    • @bo0bo07
      @bo0bo07 3 роки тому

      @@degriff explorer is my grail watch now i need to add the speedmaster to the list... my wallet is not very happy

  • @Wirbelmeister
    @Wirbelmeister 4 роки тому +2

    Nice video! I actually sold my Speedy for an Explorer, and I love it. You're 100% right on the fit on wrist, the explorer just wears perfect.

  • @chamixone
    @chamixone 4 роки тому +1

    Excellent video! I love both watches. My dream collection... Planet Ocean, Explorer, De-Ville, Carrera Skeleton dial 01... maybe Speedy. Very different watches for all occasions.

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому

      Javier Carrizosa that would be a very versatile and unique collection! Thanks Javier!

  • @lamkevinp
    @lamkevinp 4 роки тому

    Fun video! I sometimes wonder if we need anything besides a Speedy & Explorer.

  • @cobravictor
    @cobravictor 3 місяці тому

    Beautiful review, watches and video. Thank you

    • @degriff
      @degriff  3 місяці тому +1

      Thank you very much!

  • @Halfmoon67
    @Halfmoon67 4 роки тому +4

    Great video! I agree with all your points! I think we must have very similar tastes in watches. I'm the (very) happy owner of a 214270 and I often look at the Speedie, especially the First Omega In Space that is a bit smaller than the original one! Excellent presentation of the vid with the 90's street fighter design! Cheers

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому +1

      Great reading you here again Moon! Glad you caught that SF reference ;-) The Fois is only smaller because of the lug guards as far as I recall when investigating that watch, it is a minor difference. I would always suggest the pro above any other speedy 🤷‍♂️ Stay safe out there 🙏

    • @Halfmoon67
      @Halfmoon67 4 роки тому +1

      @@degriff Yes, and the other downside of the FOIS is that you can't have the beautiful hesalite :) Thanks man, stay safe too !

  • @wzzm
    @wzzm 4 роки тому

    nice video. If you don't mind, what type of camera is it?

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому +1

      Thanks! This was shot on an old d5300 :-) Nothing crazy. Thanks for watching!

    • @wzzm
      @wzzm 4 роки тому +1

      ATELIER DE GRIFF thanks!

    • @bucha4986
      @bucha4986 4 роки тому

      The question is how did he light the video...cameras do not matter. Great video btw!

  • @anteroceschin6649
    @anteroceschin6649 3 роки тому +1

    Excellent comparison! My 2 watch collection, Speedmaster Pro & Tudor Black Bay 36, blue dial.

    • @degriff
      @degriff  3 роки тому +1

      That is a great 2 watch collection as well, absolutely :-)

  • @OliWinchester
    @OliWinchester 4 роки тому +1

    Very cool video. Love both watches!

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому

      Thanks a lot Flokke! Love em both as well, no doubt 🔥

  • @diegom.8773
    @diegom.8773 4 роки тому +1

    Great video, i cannot choose, i really like both, i have 2 omegas, the moonwatch with zaphire sandwich and the gmt, also a submariner (Hulk).
    This two timepieces are completly different but great as well, my next watch will be an explorer or datejust

  • @KLucero22
    @KLucero22 3 роки тому +3

    Would be interesting to see an updated matchup with the new 2021 Speedmaster Pro with the METAS-certified caliber 3861. Thanks for the video!

    • @degriff
      @degriff  3 роки тому +2

      Thanks a lot for the feedback. If I can get my hands on one, would love to redo this matchup :-)

    • @KLucero22
      @KLucero22 3 роки тому +1

      @@degriff it would be awesome if you did! I’m curious about the new bracelet on the 2021 Speedmaster. Either way, great video

  • @malcpilling7935
    @malcpilling7935 4 роки тому +22

    Just like you I have both and would never part with either . Classics in their own right 👌

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому +2

      A lovely duo, hard to beat :-) Thanks a lot for the feedback, very much appreciate it!

    • @andychang7137
      @andychang7137 4 роки тому +2

      totally
      owing speedmaster, and just pay for my explore1 :)

  • @renenaude8122
    @renenaude8122 4 роки тому +2

    Thanks for another great video! I really enjoyed these two watches going head-to-head. I agree that, after going to the score cards, the Explorer should take the win. However, on my score card the fight was a little closer. As you know, I too own the Speedy Pro (Hesalite). I'm looking to add my next piece in about 4 or 5 years and it looks like it's going to be between the OMEGA Seamaster Diver 300M and the ROLEX Explorer. The Seamaster provides a great value for the money, but being a three hander, time-only guy I'm leaning towards the Explorer. Your video has given me more food for thought. Cheers my friend!! Be well!!

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому +1

      Great reading you here Rene! Always highly appreciated :-) Clearly both are awesome watches, and I have a lot of love for the speedy! Between seamaster diver 300m and explorer, it's a also very difficult to choose. Both are great watches, the explorer perhaps a bit more timeless, and the seamaster a bit wilder due to its color scheme. But I actually want to add one to the collection as well at some point! I particularily like the grey dial, what a beauty. I actually have a video pending on the seamaster ! :-)

    • @renenaude8122
      @renenaude8122 4 роки тому

      @@degriff Looking forward to hearing your thoughts, as always. And for me, being the conservative person that I am, it's the black dial on the iconic, yet controversial, bracelet. Best!

  • @Danzig128
    @Danzig128 4 роки тому +3

    Correct me if i'm wrong but the Explorer just isn't a historically correct piece. The one that was used for the historical hike up the Everest was a white dial Oyster Perpetual 34mm which was then later converted to the 36mm Explorer to commemorate that expedition.

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому

      Correct indeed. We did the full historical rundown in written form on the site if it can interest you: atelierdegriff.com/2018/05/30/rolex-explorer-1-buyers-guide/
      Thanks for watching and the feedback! To me the Everest story does very little, there’s many other reasons to like the Explorer :-)

  • @andyyanchan
    @andyyanchan Рік тому +1

    Amazing video! Is this the 36mm or 39mm explorer?

    • @degriff
      @degriff  Рік тому +1

      Thank you Andy! This is indeed the 39mm. Still very much in love with it ☺️

  • @jamesegan7383
    @jamesegan7383 4 роки тому +2

    great video, thanks.

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому

      James Egan thanks James!

  • @msuffian76
    @msuffian76 Рік тому

    Is there a rematch with the new speedmaster 2021 release?

  • @OhNoNotFrank
    @OhNoNotFrank 3 роки тому +4

    I love the Explorer, the Mercedes hour hand looks great, but if I'll definately stick to my Speedy.

    • @degriff
      @degriff  3 роки тому

      Speedy is so fantastic, can't fault you! :-)

  • @milesf4626
    @milesf4626 4 роки тому +1

    Just what I needed today. I have the 214270 and would love to add a speedy at some point down the line. They would both sit nicely with my 2254.50 SMP300. Anyway thank you for your vid,much appreciated by many no doubt.
    Take care folks....

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому +1

      Miles F thanks a lot Miles! 🥂 a gently used Speedy can be found at a reasonable enough price nowadays. But you already have a lovely duo I see 😄👍

    • @milesf4626
      @milesf4626 4 роки тому

      ATELIER DE GRIFF
      Thank you sir 👍

  • @thehairlesspersian3273
    @thehairlesspersian3273 3 роки тому +3

    The absolute perfect two piece collection, but speedy on leather or nato depending on weather season 💯

    • @degriff
      @degriff  3 роки тому +1

      Totally 👍

  • @randomguitarnote8887
    @randomguitarnote8887 3 роки тому

    What website would you recommend to purchase an explorer?

    • @degriff
      @degriff  3 роки тому

      honestly none. Go to your local AD and do not buy online above retail. Plenty of Rolex AD's around that want to take your money in exchange for an Explorer :-)

  • @tiongloo5310
    @tiongloo5310 3 роки тому +1

    Which will fetch better value in the secondary mkt?

    • @henrycharles2489
      @henrycharles2489 3 роки тому +1

      Rolex retains value much better than omega. Assuming you’re purchasing new

    • @degriff
      @degriff  3 роки тому

      Rolex any day indeed..

  • @tsangyman
    @tsangyman 3 роки тому +1

    Great production value

    • @degriff
      @degriff  3 роки тому

      Thanks a lot :-)

  • @CraigRoccanova
    @CraigRoccanova Рік тому

    Well I just bought both of these for my collection! Perfect video for me to watch!

    • @degriff
      @degriff  11 місяців тому +1

      Fantastic collection!!! Congrats!

    • @CraigRoccanova
      @CraigRoccanova 11 місяців тому +1

      @@degriff Thank you!

  • @davidd9478
    @davidd9478 4 роки тому

    Nice video, but I am quite surprised (and a little disappointed) that the watch movements were not mentioned. Aren't they after all as important as the looks?

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому +1

      covered that in extreme detail previously on the website and also separate watch videos on the channel :-) The Explorer video is more recent, the speedmaster is quite a bit older on the channel. Yes - the calibres are very important indeed!

  • @joeschlicht
    @joeschlicht 3 роки тому +1

    My next two watches, wanting the Rolex first, but the ongoing wait has been long and they just released a new Speedmaster that is tempting. After those two, then a Reverso and that should do it.

    • @degriff
      @degriff  3 роки тому

      Hah Joe, i literally picked up my Reverso yesterday 😅💪 The new Speedmaster is great but it is 25% more expensive, that’s a big price increase. Perhaps grab the outgoing model with a nice discount while you can. The explorer is highly likely to get an update this year

    • @joeschlicht
      @joeschlicht 3 роки тому

      @@degriff Yes, based on how I have been disappointed with Rolex new releases (OP41, Sub 41) I need to get that Explorer before it's too late! I've been waiting from 2 ADs since September. I did go see the 1861 Speedmaster at my AD earlier in the week, and they would give 10% off, which is tempting, very tempting, but the bottom line is I do no like the bracelet so much, but even worse that bulky clasp. In the grand scheme of life, paying a little more for the Speedmaster with a better bracelet won't bother me too much. Which Reverso did you get?

  • @mthirteen
    @mthirteen 4 роки тому

    for the extra 3K it should win.
    you are correct sir, these 2 would make a 2 watch set for most people. However 2 set collections also limit further explorations.... such as gold dress etc.

  • @87Cloudwalker
    @87Cloudwalker 4 роки тому +2

    I personally feel the added complication should have either cancelled out the water resistance or taken more hp from the explorer. However Rolex still wins but by a slightly narrower margin

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому

      Good point indeed, should have dropped in a mushroom, Mario Style, to add some Hp ;-) Thanks a lot for watching and the feedback! 🥂🙏

  • @denbo74
    @denbo74 18 днів тому

    I had a screen shot of this thumbnail on my phone for a while and now own both!

  • @drewhunkins7192
    @drewhunkins7192 3 роки тому +3

    The best ''two watch collection'' there is.

  • @driesdebrabandere
    @driesdebrabandere 4 роки тому +1

    I think about selling my Explorer and buy myself a vintage speedy (cal. 861). My other watches are a Rolex 16610 and a JLC Reverso. Some thinking to be done 😉

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому +1

      Those are very nice watches. A speedy would definitey fit on with those two beauties! Thanks for watching !👍🥂

    • @skrads
      @skrads 3 роки тому

      don't do it, you will regret it.

  • @jimvonkropsberg399
    @jimvonkropsberg399 3 роки тому +1

    Perfect 2 watch collection 😎

  • @rockymanaligod1312
    @rockymanaligod1312 4 роки тому

    Pm how much?

  • @the_canyon_carver
    @the_canyon_carver 4 роки тому

    Just get both. I have both and love them equally

  • @OscarTortosa
    @OscarTortosa 3 роки тому

    Good video but... I think the caliber it's importan variable to compare, the most important maybe...

  • @mstislav007
    @mstislav007 4 роки тому

    Good review. But, you cannot compare the watch's souls by specs ))

  • @hsuhaochang
    @hsuhaochang 4 роки тому

    Already get speed master and tmr is getting my explorer
    Can’t wait~

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому

      Congratulations! Let me know how you like em. Such different beasts two icons and a great duo imho

  • @likeris2
    @likeris2 4 роки тому +1

    great combo

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому

      likeris subruknem thank you :-)

  • @giovannu
    @giovannu 4 роки тому +13

    Comparing a chrono whose design dates back to the 1950s with a contemporary 3 hands makes no sense. None really wins. They are both fantastic, but too far different to compare. A Railmaster Vs Explorer would have been better
    (Sorry for my crapy English)

  • @michaelbishop9157
    @michaelbishop9157 4 роки тому +3

    Love both but explorer wins solely on grounds there is not a million limited edition versions of the explorer

  • @chateaubullion2560
    @chateaubullion2560 4 роки тому +4

    I wear my Explorer more often than my Speedy simply because of it's versatility. However, I like them equally and would never get rid of them.

  • @richardweir3342
    @richardweir3342 3 роки тому +6

    I have a speedy and love it, but I am finding myself strangely attracted to the Explorer

    • @degriff
      @degriff  3 роки тому

      I love both, excellent pieces (and very different indeed)

  • @threehander
    @threehander 4 роки тому +5

    The Speedmaster's legend is far greater.

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому

      agreed!

    • @threehander
      @threehander 4 роки тому +2

      @@degriff Loved the video format to be honest!

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому +2

      @@threehander Thanks a lot Alexander, that is really great to hear. Took quite some time to put together :-)

    • @wchingfong
      @wchingfong 4 роки тому

      Climbing the Everest still can't reach the moon~

    • @bogratful
      @bogratful 4 роки тому

      @@wchingfong explorer never was up everest anyway it was the oyster perpetual ,the explorer was introduced later as a tribute , the other watch up everest was a smiths.

  • @dpaadp1369
    @dpaadp1369 4 роки тому

    Decent video 👌

  • @gintings
    @gintings 4 роки тому +1

    This video ending needs a Fatality Mortal Kombat style 😃.

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому +1

      Rated PGS i admit i was considering it 😄 thanks for watching! 🙏

    • @gintings
      @gintings 4 роки тому

      ATELIER DE GRIFF great video. First time I see this kind of style in watch review. Looking forward to more

  • @andycarr9722
    @andycarr9722 10 місяців тому +1

    Love the speedmaster. But I just don't get the explorer. I might need to wear one and see what the fuss is all about

    • @degriff
      @degriff  10 місяців тому +2

      I totally get it. The explorer also wasn’t my first choice. It grew on my to the point where I then suddenly just had to have it 😅

  • @normanxiong5614
    @normanxiong5614 2 роки тому +1

    Welp, only way to figure out is to get both

  • @369MatteGrey
    @369MatteGrey 4 роки тому +4

    Having owned both, I can say that Speedy is more iconic, timeless, classic and legendary. Whereas Explorer is more tough and truly lived up to it's name of do anything, go anywhere watch. These two watches alone really makes the perfect two watch collection.

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому +3

      Valence Ho absolutely agree. The legendary status of the speedmaster does erode a little with every single limited edition, special edition etc... takes away some of that magic 🤷‍♂️

    • @michaelbishop9157
      @michaelbishop9157 4 роки тому

      @@degriff agreed - this is the problem. Omega have continued to dilute the legacy of the watch through all these limited editions. We all get frustrated with Rolex supply / demand issues but they respect and nurture the watch's heritage. You just can't imagine Rolex offering 20 limited edition versions of the Explorer. Maybe that's just the challenge of being owned by the Swatch Group but it means they will never compete as a brand on the same footing

    • @wchingfong
      @wchingfong 4 роки тому

      @@michaelbishop9157 Rolex limits the number of production of all sports/ professional watches, in some extent

    • @michaelbishop9157
      @michaelbishop9157 4 роки тому

      @@wchingfong all brands limit production to some extent of course but limited edition versions of the watch dilute the heritage

  • @hondaxdood
    @hondaxdood 3 місяці тому

    Wow my dream 2-watch collection!

  • @fuxxx21
    @fuxxx21 Рік тому +1

    What is your wrist size?

    • @degriff
      @degriff  11 місяців тому +1

      16.5 cm 🤜

    • @fuxxx21
      @fuxxx21 11 місяців тому

      @@degriff Thanks!

  • @johnivanp
    @johnivanp 4 роки тому +2

    So I have the slightly older 39mm Explorer with solid white gold 3, 6 and 9 and kind of prefer that look, there is also one other aspect of the Explorer that it has an anti magnetic balance spring. I adore the watch and wear more than my no date Submariner. I have just bought a Speedmaster Model 3520.50 in fantastic condition with what looks like a brand new bracelet, I love the look of this watch on my wrist and the chronograph is awesome. The only thing I am worried about is the lack of water resistance. I have been warned by several people that Speedmasters are very sensitive to water. I also think they are not quite as tough as the Rolex, but I don’t know how true that really is. All I know is “over the moon” with mine.

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому +1

      A superb duo! Yes the Mark 1 vs Mark 2 explorer is personal, At the time I could have gotten either one, but personally prefer the mark 2 :-) Good to have the choice! How do you like the bracelet on the speedy? I find it in dire need of some finetuning..

    • @MyMarsham
      @MyMarsham 3 роки тому +1

      I have Speedy, water resistance is fine, as long as you don’t go crazy. I think people make too much if the 50 metre WR, but as long as you don’t expect it to go diving it will survive. Keep in mind, Speedmaster was the ONLY watch to survive the NASA torture tests in 1965, which included humidity and water tests, because astronauts would be splashing down in salt water. A well kept speedy will be your grandkids legacy.

    • @johnivanp
      @johnivanp 3 роки тому

      ATELIER DE GRIFF Actually I do like the bracelet it’s very comfortable to wear. I think it looks nice too, I’ve only had it for a short time so I can’t say how it stands up over time, it’s definitely nice quality, maybe not as good as the Rolex bracelet though.

  • @evh4611
    @evh4611 4 роки тому

    I have both. Love 'm

  • @JDSFLA
    @JDSFLA 4 роки тому +1

    Due to both these watches being iconic I can see why one might compare them. However, if I wanted a diver I would be looking at the Omega Diver or Sea Master versus the Rolex Explorer. Also, the Speedmaster "sandwich" can be purchased with a sapphire crystal, front and back, so you can admire the movement. Lastly, there is the issue of availability as the Explorer is often on a wait list, and priced over retail making the price comparison even more lopsided.

  • @skrads
    @skrads 3 роки тому +1

    The Explorer is superior on Earth. The speedmaster is superior in Space. I lived with both but I kept the Explorer. The water resistance alone makes it so much more useable.

    • @degriff
      @degriff  3 роки тому

      I love the summary haha 👍😄 Yes - if I had to choose after all this time, I’d keep the Explorer purely because it is the more robust one. Luckily so far I didn’t have to make the choice and can keep both.

  • @kindlelife8002
    @kindlelife8002 4 роки тому +1

    Explorer is no doubt a better quality watch. However it’s a boring watch. Sold it. I still have the speedy and never get bored of it. Speedy is very versatile and looks phenomenal with any type of strap.

  • @danielmeier8321
    @danielmeier8321 4 роки тому +3

    If the explorer would be a 36mm watch again, it would be even more clear to me. Although I think you should have both in the collection

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому +4

      Hey Daniel thanks so much BFF or watching. , If it were up to me it would be 37(.5)mm. We can only dream ;-) 36mm is a bit too small for my taste for this design. Now, a nice 36mm 1016... that’s a dreamwatch, sadly the pricing on those has gone stratospheric 🙈

    • @danielmeier8321
      @danielmeier8321 4 роки тому +2

      @@degriff I could live with a 37mm explorer too :D

  • @naturalLin
    @naturalLin 2 роки тому

    I’m not feeling the speedy personally, because I prefer the panda dial better. It feels cluttered.

  • @PLAIDventures
    @PLAIDventures 3 роки тому +2

    Moonwatch all day.... just too legendary.

    • @degriff
      @degriff  3 роки тому

      Epic backstory for sure, will be hard to beat. Perhaps having to wait until the Mars landing to see what new watch may compete? :-)

  • @bogusparasite6655
    @bogusparasite6655 4 роки тому +1

    If you're going to the moon I'd say speedmaster, if you're going to the beach, explorer

  • @s3freebird
    @s3freebird 4 роки тому +2

    Outstandingly fun graphics and a very rational comparison. But...there's something about a Speedmaster..... ;-)

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому +1

      Absolutely :-) Thanks a lot for watching and the feedback as always!

  • @ruben619448
    @ruben619448 3 роки тому

    I just got the explorer. And I own a speedy. I have the perfect 2 watch collection.

    • @degriff
      @degriff  3 роки тому

      Congratulations 😄🥳👍

    • @ruben619448
      @ruben619448 3 роки тому

      Thanks. I am so excited. It comes in today some time

  • @seikailu
    @seikailu 4 роки тому +1

    You should have compare a chronograph to a chronograph

  • @cookq
    @cookq 3 роки тому

    Omega needs to make a new speedy that is 100M waterproof. I wouldn't dare wear a speedmaster on any kind of a dive.

  • @christianhardwick6530
    @christianhardwick6530 3 роки тому +1

    They don’t compare !?!

  • @jimvonkropsberg399
    @jimvonkropsberg399 3 роки тому +2

    Speedy wins !!!

  • @dhannylil2191
    @dhannylil2191 3 роки тому +1

    they look like the same size wtf

  • @colinkoh5212
    @colinkoh5212 3 роки тому

    My 2-3 cents.
    Explorer's flat reflective face can be used as a heliograph (in a pinch). It doesn't have an AR coating that scratches.
    Speedmaster’s Hesalite crystal can be polished out if scratched.
    Explorer's simple dial is aesthetically pleasing to me. When I'm outdoors, I really don't want a constant reminder of the date.
    Speedmaster’s chronograph function is useful for timing pasta.
    Rolex 100m water resistance is actually deeper than 100m so, the Rolex can double as a recreational SCUBA backup timer to my dive computer.
    Speedmaster is supposed to be rated to 30m, but flooded when I took it snorkelling to 20m.
    Stainless steel: My Speedmaster’s scratches more easily than my Explorer I.
    Pins on my Speedmaster bracelet corrode and break (it’s not easy to get repaired).
    Rolexes hold value better than Omegas.
    Rolex after sales service in Singapore is MUCH superior to Omega.
    On a hot and humid day (35C / 90%), the Speedmaster becomes more uncomfortable because of the deep engravings on the caseback.
    Speedmaster’s clasp can bend and the hinge corners start digging into your skin.

  • @62smarty
    @62smarty Рік тому

    It's like compairing apples with pears ...

  • @turningpointinspiration
    @turningpointinspiration 4 роки тому +1

    This is not even close. I would buy the explorer.

  • @dpaadp1369
    @dpaadp1369 3 роки тому +1

    2 watch collection

    • @degriff
      @degriff  3 роки тому

      Exactly 🔥🔥

  • @cqc2238
    @cqc2238 4 роки тому

    I own both. Both are amazing but these are very different animals. The bracelet on a speedy pro is truly a joke.

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому

      I wonder if this will be the year where they finally 'fix' it, it is after all the year of the moonwatch.. If not this year, then when..

  • @magnakid
    @magnakid 4 роки тому

    Both are my grails

  • @darood77
    @darood77 4 роки тому +3

    The Explorer has no story to tell. It's overrated IMO.

  • @vahek100
    @vahek100 4 роки тому +1

    Very unfair and unrelated comparison a chronograph with something that doesn’t even have date and you compare
    their heights and give Rolex the advantage what did you smile before this video?!

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому

      I smiled before and also smiled during this video indeed. This is clearly an impossible comparison, as mentioned several times during this video. Both watches are great choices and simply unique.

  • @giovannicordone1779
    @giovannicordone1779 4 роки тому

    They're different watches

  • @LeMarsouin9
    @LeMarsouin9 Рік тому

    These two watches are not comparable, the explorer doesn't have a single complication, isn't the same size...

  • @Jpjc474
    @Jpjc474 4 роки тому +1

    Which would you pick, the Explorer or a Grand Seiko Snowflake?

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому +2

      James C hey James! Really tough one, but I go with the Explorer. Both excellent choices, both can be an “only” watch collection etc..

  • @justluke8052
    @justluke8052 4 роки тому +1

    absolutely great video! No idea how can you have only 2.3k subs, like, subscribe and share from me!

    • @degriff
      @degriff  4 роки тому +1

      Thank you for the very kind words 😄🙏

  • @jimbojet8728
    @jimbojet8728 4 роки тому

    The Explorer did not go to Mt Everest!