I really think your content is well above the bar; you have a deep understanding of the topic of Wargaming, you have an ability to clearly and succinctly share that knowledge with others, and you cover quite a few good games that others rarely do. When deciding which video comment would be the best vehicle to deliver this message, I chose this one because it clearly demonstrates all of the above. Excellent work, @Justegarde.
Justin this series was great content, we don't get enough thorough comparison of systems in our wargame space. You did a fab job of it, especially breaking down how the games compared on key aspects of the period at this scale. Onwards! to BAR and Bayonet and Musket.
In the great northern war (~1700-1720) Cav were used as the hammer blow. However a frontal charge against disciplined infantry was likely to be bad. If the infantry could hold and volley at 50-30m they should win. Rather Cav was used to hammer a faltering line.
@@EarlofChutney Good to know. Most of these games didn’t really touch cavalry doctrine as a mechanic, instead limiting it to formation and weapon type. The closest was Blenheim, which distinguished between trotters and pistoliers for melee engagement; practically all it did was change the modifiers. Same again for the Vae Victis series.
I've really enjoyed your series of videos on the Age of Enlightenment and I think the comparison is great. Another series on a different era would be must watch UA-cam content.
Thanks ! I own a couple of these games, and you have helped me clarify my thoughts on the games; instead of just transitory "feelings" that I had of them.
Another enormously useful review, full of insightful commentary. Thank you. Hope you do more of these types of videos. Cost may also be an issue (as you mention). 'Horse & Musket', like so many Hollandspiele titles, is a very impressive design, but the components tend not to reflect the high price. Good content to be sure, but the maps in the other games are aesthetically very pleasing, and reflect both an attention to detail with a more reasonable cost.
Good survey. I think Piacenza most intrigues me, albeit it is just one battle. And I hope you soon do a playthrough of "Banish All Their Fears," which currently sits on my shelf mocking me.
I really think your content is well above the bar; you have a deep understanding of the topic of Wargaming, you have an ability to clearly and succinctly share that knowledge with others, and you cover quite a few good games that others rarely do.
When deciding which video comment would be the best vehicle to deliver this message, I chose this one because it clearly demonstrates all of the above.
Excellent work, @Justegarde.
@@djflippy5 Thank you very much! That is incredible kind.
Justin this series was great content, we don't get enough thorough comparison of systems in our wargame space. You did a fab job of it, especially breaking down how the games compared on key aspects of the period at this scale.
Onwards! to BAR and Bayonet and Musket.
@@66morningview Thank you! I am hoping to get into BAR before the year is out
In the great northern war (~1700-1720) Cav were used as the hammer blow. However a frontal charge against disciplined infantry was likely to be bad. If the infantry could hold and volley at 50-30m they should win. Rather Cav was used to hammer a faltering line.
@@EarlofChutney Good to know. Most of these games didn’t really touch cavalry doctrine as a mechanic, instead limiting it to formation and weapon type. The closest was Blenheim, which distinguished between trotters and pistoliers for melee engagement; practically all it did was change the modifiers. Same again for the Vae Victis series.
I've really enjoyed your series of videos on the Age of Enlightenment and I think the comparison is great. Another series on a different era would be must watch UA-cam content.
@@jamesbarton9285 Thank you! I had the idea of doing one for French & Indian War at some point.
Love me a good compare and contrast, thanks for this.
Thanks ! I own a couple of these games, and you have helped me clarify my thoughts on the games; instead of just transitory "feelings" that I had of them.
Another enormously useful review, full of insightful commentary. Thank you. Hope you do more of these types of videos.
Cost may also be an issue (as you mention). 'Horse & Musket', like so many Hollandspiele titles, is a very impressive design, but the components tend not to reflect the high price. Good content to be sure, but the maps in the other games are aesthetically very pleasing, and reflect both an attention to detail with a more reasonable cost.
Great show and interesting topic - always enjoy your reviews and perspective
Justin, I really appreciate all the effort it took to make this video - great job!
Oh, thanks for not burdening us with Banish All Their Fears, LOL!
Enjoyable comparison video-thank you.
Good survey. I think Piacenza most intrigues me, albeit it is just one battle. And I hope you soon do a playthrough of "Banish All Their Fears," which currently sits on my shelf mocking me.
Should be Prince Eugene of Savoy, crossing the alpes on the HnM cover.
Thanks for the comparison, of them all I have H&M in P&P format, as well as newly acquired Blenheim will hit my table this year 😁
Give Prussia's Glory (I and II) a go, really good
Have you thought about dying the BAR system?
@@forzamark Oh yeah. But I suspect that will be a big undertaking. It’s on my list when I get some time.
great vide, after I had to watch a pro abortion ad. nice....
Ads are based on your viewing habits, so…hooray for you being pro-woman’s healthcare!
@@KevSharp_au Thanks. As you know, channel owners don’t control the ads UA-cam serves.