I'm a bit confused: (e/me)*(h/2) is the same as (e/2me)h. Is there a typo in the expression? These videos are fantastic, by the way - thank you for making them available!
@@miladjl5790 the word narrative implies that experimentally the cited formula reported do not hold. Since experimentally the energy splitiing for spin is twice the opbital splitting a factor of proportionality g= 2 must be introduced for the intrinsic spin. therefore, you must conssider as valid the formula following the one cited in your comment.
no typo...that's the whole point. The spin moment has a g-factor of 2 and a magnitude of h/2...and the orbital moment has a g-factor of 1 and a magnitude of h...both scenarii give the same result, but one only is correct: the spin
![L1PA Introduction to Spintronics: Spin and Orbital Momenta [ENG]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/zHK-tF_EHdw/mqdefault.jpg)
![L1PA Introduction to Spintronics: Spin and Orbital Momenta [ENG]](/img/tr.png)
![L2PA Introduction to Spintronics: Band Magnetism in Transition Metals [ENG]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/CEIFeC_AHjg/mqdefault.jpg)
Happy I stumbled on this channel
I'm a bit confused: (e/me)*(h/2) is the same as (e/2me)h. Is there a typo in the expression?
These videos are fantastic, by the way - thank you for making them available!
I also have the same question!
@@miladjl5790 the word narrative implies that experimentally the cited formula reported do not hold. Since experimentally the energy splitiing for spin is twice
the opbital splitting a factor of proportionality g= 2 must be introduced for the intrinsic spin. therefore, you must conssider as valid the formula following the one cited in your comment.
no typo...that's the whole point. The spin moment has a g-factor of 2 and a magnitude of h/2...and the orbital moment has a g-factor of 1 and a magnitude of h...both scenarii give the same result, but one only is correct: the spin
Drive