Відео

Top-class animation.

Hi Aurelien. Thank you for a wonderful lecture. You sometimes treat the divergence of the spin current not as a scalar, but as a vector (e.g. taking the cross product with the magnetization). How exactly can this be?

Drive

can you explain more why lamda is greater than d that made transverse wall ? I do not see any equation to prove that

Merci monsieur pour votre effort et votre temps

25:59 it is not straightforward to me why a pure spin current will produce no Joule heating: Will not there be some scattering mechanisms for each of the two oppositely directed the spin up/down channels anyway?

Wonder if this can be used to make neodymium permanent magnets much stronger by enhancing the locked micrograins with oxide and other surface orbital inflections. Perhaps it could be a special treatment on a very select set of grain surface sizes and properties. Then again, optimizing the whole of the grain->crystal structure would make for a higher strength magnet as well.. Maybe we could get a couple Tesla this time around without pinching larger bulky magnetic domains into a pyramidal ring. Im sure the binder is weaker than it could be too

very intersting courses.

your explanation is very nice, do you have a lecture for spin polarized tunnel junction between two spin-split superconductors ?

22:23 the work of graphene. The author of it is Tombros and the length should be micrometer, instead of millimeter.

Thank you very much or the lectures. I hope one day to understand Magnetism as much as you do

Very very informative series! I really neeeeeeed the lecture 7!

The biggest lecture on youtube! thank you very much!

Nice lecture , if we decreases the temperature why exchange coupling length decreases and lower the exchange coupling effect.

I wanted to visit your website, but the site is unavailable error. Can you let me know if there is any change?

8:05 wasn't it Heaviside who simplified 12 of those 20 original Maxwell field in equation in 1884 ? ref: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_Heaviside#Middle_years

Great explanation hope see you soon with more such lectures

Thank you Professor. In this lecture I have a doubt at time 3:30 min. Where you considered the the conductivity equivalent to resistors for up and down electrons. The digram on bottom right corner contradicting the related statements for mean free path and conductivity. There is is something confusing.

Excellent lecture.

Is "micromagnetics" an excuse to rebrand old physics as something new? What is the motivation? All materials magetic phenomena is "micro". Lots of good device physicists have used mean field theories and everything else for half a century of mag memory development.

lecture 7？

the magnetic anisotropy energy for one-full-spin assumption should add the cofficient of one quarter in 9:32

This link NO LONGER works, preventing access to the PDF files. ua-cam.com/play/PLF1h7eFXS6AhfC0APUq6YoFh8zoQCs2QV.html

@ 16:52 The magnetic field strength at the center of a circular loop in vacuum is given by B = μ0 . I / (2.R)

Hard Physics with easy style. Excellent Sir! Good Spintronics Energy

Happy I stumbled on this channel

can u please specify a standard reference material for further reading ?

Hey, this is a great explanation. Thank you. Also, can you share us the resources that you have used here?

Merci d'avoir dégagé ces conférences pour le grand public.

I'm afraid the Website listed in the description currently does not work properly.

It is really a good course!

Hi sir, super honored to attend your crystallography course in aix st jerome. Currently taking spintroniques course now and your vidoes are really helping me. Great teacher and person. THANK YOU!

Sir all of your lectures are very helpful and covers a wide range in details. Sir could you please provide the lectures note regarding this spintronics course, if you have. Even if you can suggest the book you have followed, that would be itself a great help for me. As I am completely new in this field.

19:54 there should be a correction. the orbital momentum in the y direction comes indirectly from the mixing of the px and pz orbitals in the bottom chain mediated via the pz orbitals in the top chain. Isn't it? You mentioned that it came from the mixing of the px and py orbitals of the bottom chain. While earlier in the lecture you mentioned indirect mixing of the px and pz of the bottom chain.

thank you so much for your videos ! your serie of videos in spintronics help me a lot to understand the fundamental and the applications. I already subscribed your youtube channel. I looking forward to discover your new lectures

Please share the pdf files sir.

Thanks!

merci monsieur Aurelien Manchon

Sir, could you please add lectures on skyrmions also. It would be very helpful.. thank you.

Thanks for the wonderful lectures. Smile at the end of each of the lecture is special!

thank you so much for excellent lectures

Thank you professor, your beautifully explained video lectures are very useful

Very nice presentation, thank you so much professor!

thank you so much for these useful series.I can not to connect to your website in order to have access to pdf file of the script.I will be happy if you help

Sir can these lectures be provided with animation and your voice behind it?

I'm a bit confused: (e/me)*(h/2) is the same as (e/2me)h. Is there a typo in the expression? These videos are fantastic, by the way - thank you for making them available!

Dear Dr Aurelien , you said that as we decrease the dimension it's density of states would decrease , should not then stoner criteria may not be satisfied at lower dimensions. But you are also saying magnetism increases at lower dimensions. Please clarify. I am completely confused.

I must say, your lectures are splendid. Very nice work Prof. Dr. Manchon!

Thank you very much from Brazil.

It is very important. Thank