MAP×RPM is one of the things I have been looking forward to learn more of. Following the whittlebeast curve thread on msextra was very interesting. Keep up the good work.
thank you good sir Andy for sharing your vast knowledge and experiences. one day i hope to call upon some of what you have taught me. live long and prosper good sir!
Hi Andy. I'm at the stage where I was considering MAP or MAF. Its on a 351 Cleveland, Tow cam and M122 running 5psi. 1200-4200 RPM. Watching this I'm thinking just MAP would do, but I have this wierd desire for a MAF. Would appreciate your expert opinion. Cheers Rob
Interesting info, thanks. My aircooled 3.3L turbo does not follow the straight line map*rpm vs. DC. It gets a lot steeper at around 9000map*rpm and about 45 DC.
One of the most helpful discussions out there. Thanks.
I noticed that I did not mention that MAPxRPM is an optional calculated field.
See and choose and reload the MLVHD
MAP×RPM is one of the things I have been looking forward to learn more of. Following the whittlebeast curve thread on msextra was very interesting.
Keep up the good work.
Very very good info. Definitely good info. I like the custom data fields
Looks like a VW valve cover & clutch cable... was this one of those joint ventures VW & Ford had?
thank you good sir Andy for sharing your vast knowledge and experiences. one day i hope to call upon some of what you have taught me. live long and prosper good sir!
Hi Andy. I'm at the stage where I was considering MAP or MAF. Its on a 351 Cleveland, Tow cam and M122 running 5psi. 1200-4200 RPM. Watching this I'm thinking just MAP would do, but I have this wierd desire for a MAF. Would appreciate your expert opinion. Cheers Rob
Any flat foot / two step shifting comparison logs?
Interesting info, thanks. My aircooled 3.3L turbo does not follow the straight line map*rpm vs. DC. It gets a lot steeper at around 9000map*rpm and about 45 DC.
Post a zipped up data log over at Msextra.com and lets see what you are looking at.
Its on hold on tuning forum since 2.10