It's actually significantly better. You have to compare the whites of the target to the whites of other objects in the scene. Whichever has the most contrast wins. The telos will show you a target next to a tree trunk for example. The others it would blend in. Don't be fooled by the apparent detail... contrasty images might look pleasing, but it's a sign of a bad software and bad thermal sensitivity.
@@billyyoung1630 - details = contrast. Look at grass and other vegetation here. Telos has much less details than the others, which is a sign of a poorer and quite frankly a ridiculously overpriced unit.
The telos has way more adjustments than what is being represented here. You can make the picture more detailed and contrasty. But why would you? You want the deer to not compare to any other warm targets in the scene. I don't need to ID the grass, so low contrast removes the details there and makes it less distracting, improving detection in tougher environments. Any device would work in an open field like this.
Which one for bird spotting? I think maybe a model with a wider view and shorter minimum focus distance? Mainly for use with lots of trees.
What’s wrong with the Pulsar Telos?!
It looks horrible. It’s not even in the same league as the other three from this comparison.
It's actually significantly better. You have to compare the whites of the target to the whites of other objects in the scene. Whichever has the most contrast wins. The telos will show you a target next to a tree trunk for example. The others it would blend in. Don't be fooled by the apparent detail... contrasty images might look pleasing, but it's a sign of a bad software and bad thermal sensitivity.
@@billyyoung1630 - details = contrast. Look at grass and other vegetation here. Telos has much less details than the others, which is a sign of a poorer and quite frankly a ridiculously overpriced unit.
The telos has way more adjustments than what is being represented here. You can make the picture more detailed and contrasty. But why would you? You want the deer to not compare to any other warm targets in the scene. I don't need to ID the grass, so low contrast removes the details there and makes it less distracting, improving detection in tougher environments. Any device would work in an open field like this.
@@billyyoung1630 - Balony
To rate positively a lack of details in a digital image, is like rating a kids drawing of humans as works of art....