Looks different inside without the blue force trackers etc. I spent way to much of my life inside those strykers. Good vehicle, high survivability for the crew and grunts inside. Helped me survive seven different ied attacks. We didn't have to deal with drones etc.
Does the gunner shoot outside with the browning or is they're a way to control it from inside the vehicle...bcuz I noticed not much protection if the gunner is outside of the vehicle..you insight is much respected
@@lonniemoody5318 there is a remote weapon system that you use to control the 50 or the mk19 from inside ofnthe vehicles. It's controlled from that digital screen you could see bolted down on the inside and a joystick like the ones in a flight simulator. I am not sure if their rws was working or not when this was filmed. There are alot of extra armor you can add to the strykers that help protect everyone that has to stick their head out of the hatches and they had none of it for whatever reason. Ours had cope cages, netting on top, all the extra armor to keep our upper bodies more protected while exposed out of the hatches. They had the most basic stripped down version but nit wasn't the oldest version. Then older ones had the bench seats in the back instead of those individual seats you saw in the video which are meant to collapse after an explosion so you don't liquify yourself on the roof. They also didn't have the double v hull, which this one does. Making encounters with mines more survivable.
This is an extremely functional battle taxi. Send another hundred working Strykers to Ukraine, and add two hundred working humvees. Infantry support and mobility are of highest importance for the dynamic combat zones. A Stryker can carry substantial and large ammo and other supplies to the front line.
IFV is a term given to an armored vehicle that carries troops and has an autocannon or turret with large gun or anti-tank missiles for engaging and destroying other armoured vehicles. This Stryker has none of those so the term Armoured Personnel Carrier (APC) is more appropriate.
@@Julian-zj2qy 0:38 "Ukraine recieved only 1 kind, this one, it's an infantry fighting vehicle"..To my understanding it's just a result of old equipment and the use of these terms have changed, similarly to how displacement equal to what was a destroyer is now referred to as a frigate or even a corvette
@@SimonTmte 3:50 "So this is the inside of the Stryker APC". So he uses both terms. You're right. Confusing. Not that it matters I suppose. The old FV432s had 7.62mm in a turret and that was an (infantry) Fighting Vehicle. But we called them APCs. I'm getting a headache thinking about it..
yep, that was weird comment. But I think journalist tried to make point that even not newest US equipment is great and can server very well. The soldier admitted they lost 0 defenders in their Striker
Scary? Of course. But MUCH better than walking into enemy fire. Plus these vehicles carry stuff to and from the battlefield at speed. That was the point of the video. That is what these guys said.
yeah and + you know there is a shit ton of things who can explode your metal box,and even if you survive that,get in out of that metal box is a death penalty,damn boomer don't know the luck they got to not be send in first class vip with death
Yeah with all these consumer drones conductubg recon, seems pretty diffucult to maintain element of surprise and limits the numbers of infantry per squad
@ You do know when Challenger 2 came into service, right mate? You think the UK sent their latest and greatest? Do you think anyone has other than himars and a few drone models they want to test? With very few exceptions most of the gear sent to them is decades old. The first of these vehicles was fielded in 2002. Tell me what other piece of armor in the field in Ukraine first saw service after 2002. Right. Right.
@@FaronPL World wars are usually defined by their multi-continental theatres, not by multi-continental opponents. But yes, there were more world wars than the two we officially refer to as such -however, the scale was not nearly as huge.
A friend of mine was driving a Stryker in Baghdad when it hit an IED and was thrown 50m and rendered inoperable. He broke his ankle when it landed, everyone survived. He believed that with any other vehicle they would have been playing Boots and Saddles for him in formation. Good machine for a good cause. Slava
The Stryker vehicles derived from the Canadian LAV III. Stryker vehicles are produced by General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada (GDLS-C) from 2002 - present. Your welcome from Canada 🇨🇦 eh
@@deanfirnatine7814not really. The first gen 1979/80’s were. Been American owned and controlled in various forms for decades now, currently General Dynamics. R&D is world wide. Made both in Switzerland and Canada in different forms depending on client states needs.
A good friend of mine was one of the first Stryker drives in testing and when they went into service way back over 20 years ago. Based at the time at Fort Lewis, now called JBLM, he was in the triple nickel. 555th. Glad to see they are still being used.
The M-1126 isn't that old they started the program in the late 90's if I'm not mistaken. It was developed for duties where the M-2 was overkill. So this APC is about 50 years younger than the M-113.
The main takeaway in this video that everyone should recognize is that even with 20+ year old Stryker's or even older M-113's, they are still far more superior and reliable than anything the Russians are fielding on the Zero Line. If anyone doubts this, just go to inspect the designs of the Stryker compared to its Russian equivalent, the BTR and then tally up the total amounts of video's you have watched of BTR''s being plugged on the battle front compared to any older Western supplied equipment. And if you click the knob 1-notch up and start talking about real IFV's like the M-2 or CRV or Marder's, then the Russians don't even have a class of vehicles to match them all. ❤💯💙💛
Russia has been surviving on the inertia of their Soviet stockpiles. Aging population, brain drain and political remodelling and unpunished corruption of the Russian military has really limited anything outside of slapping a few gadgets on a T72 and calling it a new model. Ukraine had the same issues, but they woke up after 2014.
@@igosannuffin7565 Trading land for losses. The Russians lose about a battalion’s worth of men every day to capture a field or a pile of rubble, not to mention armored vehicles that are harder to replace. That’s not sustainable in the long run, especially as their economy is slowly collapsing. Why do you think they have to rely on ammunition from Iran and North Korea and now North Korean soldiers? Russia is losing no matter how you look at it.
A beautiful machine! Canadian designed and made 🇨🇦🇺🇸🇺🇦 Battle tested and proven the Stryker is a great versatile vehicle. Hopefully the Ukrainians can get the other variants too!
Hi didn't say that it wasn't real war. He said that Striker was first deployed to battle insurgents. So basically it wasn't participated in active combat against regular Iraq forces as I understand. And that's what you can find on Wikipedia.
Strykers aren't that old. 22 years at most, I think? It showed up right after we went into Afghanistan and right before Iraq. Now the M113s we sent are old. Like some of the hulls have been around since vietnam.
That M2 is definitely mounted on a RWS. You can operate from the top if the RWS is INOP. Otherwise the screen you saw in the gunner station operates the weapon and has a day and thermal viewer.
NATO needs to get troops in Ukraine and get this thing over with. You notice China hasn't been saying anything. They're just kind of sitting back watching. Putin just needs to pull out of Ukraine. 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦✌️
I just kinda hate people when they advertise weapons of destruction, and people think its okay, seriously why would you want to hurt someone when they probably forced to fight you.
I like how he keeps calling it OLD when 90% of the BMPs driving around on both sides are from the 70s and 80s haha
Yep, I was like what are you talking about, unlike the other APC's it is a 21st century vehicle
@@deanfirnatine7814nope, 20th century
У России много БТР сделанных после 2020
Military vehicles are not released like consumer products every year a new model.
My thoughts exactly. Ukraine is still driving T-64s and he calls a Stryker "old".
The nostalgia. I miss driving and riding in Strykers. The C7 engine turbo whistle was beautiful.
well, you wouldn't like to drive it in Kursk...unlike in Iraq, in Kursk, you are the prey.
@@tommytomas-fr3shYou know nothing, dummy
This vehicle and The Bradley have significantly gained reputation in this war.
The Ukrainian soldiers always have a smile, bloody amazing.
The Ukrainians are always so full of... inspiration. 💙💛
Looks different inside without the blue force trackers etc. I spent way to much of my life inside those strykers. Good vehicle, high survivability for the crew and grunts inside. Helped me survive seven different ied attacks. We didn't have to deal with drones etc.
❤🙏
Does the gunner shoot outside with the browning or is they're a way to control it from inside the vehicle...bcuz I noticed not much protection if the gunner is outside of the vehicle..you insight is much respected
@@lonniemoody5318 there is a remote weapon system that you use to control the 50 or the mk19 from inside ofnthe vehicles. It's controlled from that digital screen you could see bolted down on the inside and a joystick like the ones in a flight simulator. I am not sure if their rws was working or not when this was filmed. There are alot of extra armor you can add to the strykers that help protect everyone that has to stick their head out of the hatches and they had none of it for whatever reason. Ours had cope cages, netting on top, all the extra armor to keep our upper bodies more protected while exposed out of the hatches. They had the most basic stripped down version but nit wasn't the oldest version. Then older ones had the bench seats in the back instead of those individual seats you saw in the video which are meant to collapse after an explosion so you don't liquify yourself on the roof. They also didn't have the double v hull, which this one does. Making encounters with mines more survivable.
@@lonniemoody5318 Remote control from inside the Stryker.
Russians had a similar type of transporter. Their tires were made in China. They bristled and crumbled. Can’t handle weight for too long.
The announcer seems to think a 20 year old Stryker is “old”……but he should see the Russian stuff!
BIG RESPECT TO ALL YOU WARRIORS.... BIG RESPECT AND THANK YOU... LOS ANGELES, CA
❤❤❤
Shame ukraine will soon be no more now the criminal is in charge off usa
Please quit screaming. We all can read.
Bro's calling a stryker old/oldschool wtaf. When they came out I just got out and I WISHED we had something that high tech!
Excellent report. Thank you.
This is an extremely functional battle taxi. Send another hundred working Strykers to Ukraine, and add two hundred working humvees. Infantry support and mobility are of highest importance for the dynamic combat zones.
A Stryker can carry substantial and large ammo and other supplies to the front line.
you need to be sent there
@@SuperMoscowcitylol spot the butthurt russian
@@DiscipulaIncognitus You make no sense and you have no argument. You are only shooting blanks, so you are irrelevant. SMH. Thanks for playing.
@@wcangel Hahahaha.why are you serving Ukraine with your flapping lips when they need your hands and feet? Clown. Stay safe.
Let Europe send that stuff.
IFV is a term given to an armored vehicle that carries troops and has an autocannon or turret with large gun or anti-tank missiles for engaging and destroying other armoured vehicles.
This Stryker has none of those so the term Armoured Personnel Carrier (APC) is more appropriate.
Good point. The Browning 50cal is not a 'cannon'. He does call it an APC in the video though.
@@Julian-zj2qy 0:38 "Ukraine recieved only 1 kind, this one, it's an infantry fighting vehicle"..To my understanding it's just a result of old equipment and the use of these terms have changed, similarly to how displacement equal to what was a destroyer is now referred to as a frigate or even a corvette
@@SimonTmte 3:50 "So this is the inside of the Stryker APC". So he uses both terms. You're right. Confusing. Not that it matters I suppose. The old FV432s had 7.62mm in a turret and that was an (infantry) Fighting Vehicle. But we called them APCs. I'm getting a headache thinking about it..
@@Julian-zj2qynot so confusing. If you google the machine, it will tell you it’s an APC-IFV hybrid
@@ФіліпМальцан Now I find it's an Interim Armored Vehicle! I don't care anymore.
Strikers forward! Loved driving that beast back in 02-06.
👊🏽💪🏾
ukraine cant even help itself
American armour smoking the bears on their own land
Smoking in pieces by now.
👍
Who is Smoking what that will tell you Frontline where Russia is advancing
At what cost
Gotta ring North korea for fodder. Who are now gorging themselves off pornography as they get access the internet for the first time
Excellent report from Journalists who risk their lives to bring us the story. Thank you.
old? 20 years is "new" on that battlefield
yep, that was weird comment. But I think journalist tried to make point that even not newest US equipment is great and can server very well. The soldier admitted they lost 0 defenders in their Striker
@@art4018 because the stryker hasnt been hit yet. Not much survivability there if hit by a lancet
Must be terrifying… driving around in a metal box… not knowing what can hit you next. War sucks.
Scary? Of course. But MUCH better than walking into enemy fire. Plus these vehicles carry stuff to and from the battlefield at speed. That was the point of the video. That is what these guys said.
yeah and + you know there is a shit ton of things who can explode your metal box,and even if you survive that,get in out of that metal box is a death penalty,damn boomer don't know the luck they got to not be send in first class vip with death
Yeah with all these consumer drones conductubg recon, seems pretty diffucult to maintain element of surprise and limits the numbers of infantry per squad
Excellent documentary! Bravo!
THESE ARE DESIGNED + MADE IN CANADA - You're Welcome . General Dynamics - Canada Division
Blessings, peace and luck from California to Ukraine. 🙏🙏☮🍀💛💙 (1)
Slava Ukraine!!!
Thanks for your guided tour of that Stryker ? a real eye opener Regards from UK
Stryker 💪🫡
God Bless Ukraine
Благослови Боже Україну
Blahoslovy Bozhe Ukrayinu
Maybe old,but what a great bit of kit,the Stryker is! And a Browning Machine Gun,is awesome!
Dude - They are using tanks from the 60s and 70s. This is probably some of the newest kit they have.
What a load of bollocks
@ You do know when Challenger 2 came into service, right mate? You think the UK sent their latest and greatest? Do you think anyone has other than himars and a few drone models they want to test? With very few exceptions most of the gear sent to them is decades old. The first of these vehicles was fielded in 2002. Tell me what other piece of armor in the field in Ukraine first saw service after 2002. Right. Right.
@FredoTheMan1 they did get some challenger a2s so what the hell do you know.
@ And they entered service in what year?
In 2024 Ukrainian soldiers, in American machines, fighting NORTH KOREANS, in Russia. Crazy 😜
isn't that world war yet?
@@FaronPLinstigated by Stinky Putin😏
@@FaronPLlooks like beginning of ww2, but it's Ukraine now instead of Poland
@@FaronPL World wars are usually defined by their multi-continental theatres, not by multi-continental opponents. But yes, there were more world wars than the two we officially refer to as such -however, the scale was not nearly as huge.
@@johnweak6788 looks like each time we going more East, at least some progress :)
Love these walk throughs and the interviews on frontline troops 💙🇺🇦🇺🇸💙
Outstanding machine ❤vielen dank 🇺🇸 USA 🇺🇸 Slava Ukraine 👍 💙 💛 ✌️ 💯 🤝🔰🔱✅️✅️
❤❤❤
@ua7847 👍
The Stryker is really a great infantry fighting vehicle.
At least that's what the manufacturer would say. The soldiers call it the kevlar coffin.
For info the Striker is made in Ontario, Canada
Quick correction Stryker is a APC
Excellent report
Slava Ukraine благослови боже сміливих🇺🇸🇺🇦
Ukraine has a the full support of South Carolina!!!! ❤❤❤
Not for much longer
South Carolina is irrelevant on the world stage.
A friend of mine was driving a Stryker in Baghdad when it hit an IED and was thrown 50m and rendered inoperable. He broke his ankle when it landed, everyone survived. He believed that with any other vehicle they would have been playing Boots and Saddles for him in formation. Good machine for a good cause. Slava
Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦💪🇺🇦
Thanks, UNITED 24.
Michelin tires in Russia!
Odd thing is, here in Pennsylvania, my Jeep has Nokian tires made before sanctions....Finland brand, made in ruzzia. Oops!
The USA should provide the UAF with a massive number of BFVs and Strikers. The UAF likes and knows how to effectively use and maintain them.
The Stryker vehicles derived from the Canadian LAV III. Stryker vehicles are produced by General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada (GDLS-C) from 2002 - present.
Your welcome from Canada 🇨🇦 eh
and thats a copy of the Swiss made Morag Pirahna III
@@deanfirnatine7814not really. The first gen 1979/80’s were. Been American owned and controlled in various forms for decades now, currently General Dynamics. R&D is world wide. Made both in Switzerland and Canada in different forms depending on client states needs.
Thank you 🙏 dear kozakiv and sokoly 🦅 Please stay safe 🙏 Heroyam Slava 🇺🇦✊Best regards from Maria 🇸🇪🤝🇺🇦🤗
A good friend of mine was one of the first Stryker drives in testing and when they went into service way back over 20 years ago. Based at the time at Fort Lewis, now called JBLM, he was in the triple nickel. 555th. Glad to see they are still being used.
Many if not most were made in Canada
The M-1126 isn't that old they started the program in the late 90's if I'm not mistaken. It was developed for duties where the M-2 was overkill. So this APC is about 50 years younger than the M-113.
What is wrong with the remote weapon station?
Viva Ucrania ❤❤❤❤❤
I don't know about anyone else but the Stryker looks way sexier than any of the BTRs
I thoroughly enjoyed this report! Well done, and all the best to your correspondent and the crew. 💙💛
❤👊🏽💪🏾🙏
Meeting with the vehicle operations team shows interest in their practical experience
Heroyam Slava! Slava Ukraine!!
The M2 is bad ass!
Σλαβα ουκρανια❤❤❤❤❤❤
Slava ukraine hero slava 🇺🇦🤝🇪🇺
That "old machine" is newer than 90% of the vehicles in the war
Guarantee that Stryker isn't older than 20 years
Thank you, Strength and Love.
i served 7 years in the army and my first job was a Stryker driver it had AC but ours was broken during my deployment lol
03:20Sorry people, but the 7.62*39 is for the AK47 ... and the AMD ammo is the 5.56 for the AK74
The main takeaway in this video that everyone should recognize is that even with 20+ year old Stryker's or even older M-113's, they are still far more superior and reliable than anything the Russians are fielding on the Zero Line. If anyone doubts this, just go to inspect the designs of the Stryker compared to its Russian equivalent, the BTR and then tally up the total amounts of video's you have watched of BTR''s being plugged on the battle front compared to any older Western supplied equipment. And if you click the knob 1-notch up and start talking about real IFV's like the M-2 or CRV or Marder's, then the Russians don't even have a class of vehicles to match them all. ❤💯💙💛
Russia has been surviving on the inertia of their Soviet stockpiles. Aging population, brain drain and political remodelling and unpunished corruption of the Russian military has really limited anything outside of slapping a few gadgets on a T72 and calling it a new model. Ukraine had the same issues, but they woke up after 2014.
@@hayleyxyz So why are they retreating and getting pound by the day
@@igosannuffin7565 Trading land for losses. The Russians lose about a battalion’s worth of men every day to capture a field or a pile of rubble, not to mention armored vehicles that are harder to replace. That’s not sustainable in the long run, especially as their economy is slowly collapsing. Why do you think they have to rely on ammunition from Iran and North Korea and now North Korean soldiers? Russia is losing no matter how you look at it.
@@uniformmike05 You can continue comfort yourself
@@uniformmike05What do you think Ukraine is winning.
The Canadians put the same canon as on the Bradley on some of their Strykers. They don't call it a Stryker, but it is very similar.
A beautiful machine! Canadian designed and made 🇨🇦🇺🇸🇺🇦
Battle tested and proven the Stryker is a great versatile vehicle. Hopefully the Ukrainians can get the other variants too!
Its a excellent APC, billion times better than old M113
The oldest Stykers were built in the early 2000s and into the decade afterwards.
Arma3 KotH RHS runs TOW Strykers, basically a 20ton 8x8 motocrosser that hunts tanks 😊
Thanks. ✌🏻👊🏼
Thanks for the run-down, man.
The Strykers are around 25 years old.
Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦 💪👍👌🇺🇸🇵🇭
What did i hear? Now the Striker is in a real War? So you say that Iraq was not a real war or what?! Or is it the language barrier?
More or less, it's a trial without accompanied air support
Hi didn't say that it wasn't real war. He said that Striker was first deployed to battle insurgents. So basically it wasn't participated in active combat against regular Iraq forces as I understand. And that's what you can find on Wikipedia.
Keep saying strikers are old, but they are pretty new
That Stryker will not u let u down no matter how old it is!!!!! It's really not that old!!!!
The title is wrong, it's a APC not IFV.
Strykers aren't that old. 22 years at most, I think? It showed up right after we went into Afghanistan and right before Iraq. Now the M113s we sent are old. Like some of the hulls have been around since vietnam.
Styker is a modern version of the stalwart very similar in concept .
Молодий репортер. Каски також є ознакою поваги до воїнів. Накрийте його.
Is that m2 machine are remote control or no?
❤❤❤❤❤Ukraine
HOLD ON BOYS THE WAR IS ALMOST OVER
Pretty exposed up there shame they don't get remote brownings operated from within the cab
It has the remote weapons station.
That M2 is definitely mounted on a RWS. You can operate from the top if the RWS is INOP. Otherwise the screen you saw in the gunner station operates the weapon and has a day and thermal viewer.
OOOLD ?? I’m guessing they didn’t check the dates on the M1 Abrams or the M2 .50 cal
🤷🏼
A good Old Battle Taxi gives you a ride free of charge to where you're CO wants you
Keep safe courageous people💪🏾👊🏽🙏❤️
So what year and model was this Stryker Built?
Guys?
Wouldn't that make it an APC rather than an IFV? Typically IFV's will have something like a 25mm cannon on top I thought.
Excellent video thanks!
Slava Ukraini 💙💛
Héroes de Ucrania
NATO needs to get troops in Ukraine and get this thing over with. You notice China hasn't been saying anything. They're just kind of sitting back watching. Putin just needs to pull out of Ukraine. 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦✌️
I know for a fact that can destroy a BTR
IT'S INTERESTING, the Stryker AND The Bradley are small. fast, reasonably Armed, and quickly Carry Troops TO/FROM the Battlefield.
The Ukrainian soldiers use allied equipment as good or better then they do ! Amazing how quick they learn.😎
SLAVA UKRAINI!!!!!!!
I just kinda hate people when they advertise weapons of destruction, and people think its okay, seriously why would you want to hurt someone when they probably forced to fight you.
👍🏻🇺🇦✌️🇬🇧
Sad that these guys don't get the best and the latest from their Western partners.
Filled a gap in my knowledge of war systems.
More reports with Philip.
When did we start sending Strykers?
Thanks to the US TAXPAYERS
The Stryker is old... Many of the IFVs in Ukraine are twice or more that age....
What's your point? Must be a Krem bot
@shionuzuki5549 My point? I dont think the Stryker is a old vehicle
Imagine the striker's tires are Michelin compared to Russian IFV made in china 🤣🤣🤣
KM? What's that in miles?
@@WhoThisMonkey uneducated much?
Aboot 70 mph give or take lol.