World War 3: Every Day (Western Victory)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 733

  • @matthewplancon
    @matthewplancon 3 роки тому +743

    The only thing I seriously question is how China pushed through the Himalayas so easily and was able to push so far into India, out of all countries India and China are the most similar in size and capabilities I don’t think that border would move for a long time

    • @walx274
      @walx274 3 роки тому +62

      They probably would actually try to push through the Himalayas knowing China , they could only send a limited number of troops through , but it’d be possible , and then you’ve got the fact india was and is completely surrounded by enemies as shown in the video , from the north to the south to the east , surrounded
      And india is already definitely not “similar in size and capabilities” sure they aren’t too far off but China definitely has the superior military strength l but then you’ve also got the fact the other members of the csto would also use their troops and invade through their countries such as through Pakistan of myanmar

    • @reubennelson4086
      @reubennelson4086 3 роки тому +11

      @Matthew Plancon india is 1/3rd the size of china and also has fewer resources not to mention half the nukes and a smaller economy as well

    • @Mattiacino
      @Mattiacino 3 роки тому +17

      China has a lot of highways there and since India probably can’t mobilize as fast they would lose it pretty early

    • @_knowledegedit-
      @_knowledegedit- 3 роки тому +11

      @@reubennelson4086 bro mostly Chinese population live in East Asian cost side
      Chinese is not able to move it's larger population to Himalayan mountains for war
      But India has advantages because it's larger population live in Chinese border side so it will move it's larger population for warupload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/49/World_population_density_1994_-_with_equator.png

    • @bobateacuber7646
      @bobateacuber7646 3 роки тому +5

      Also the fact that they steamrolled through vietnam and thailand lmao it’s jungle

  • @thepriestofvaranasi
    @thepriestofvaranasi 3 роки тому +452

    China might have superiority over India but I don't think that Chinese invasion on India through the Himalayas is even a realistic scenario. Even if they did, it's very unlikely to push that far into India. India and other allies would start blasting their missiles on the invading troops resulting into a stalemate.

    • @randomtexanguy9563
      @randomtexanguy9563 2 роки тому +26

      also, it's the Himalayas

    • @अण्वायुवरीवर्त
      @अण्वायुवरीवर्त 2 роки тому +13

      I'd hope India's neighbours after the war would be Tibet and not china.

    • @samtex2018
      @samtex2018 2 роки тому +4

      The author is a person with cerebral palsy. Humans should remember, on this globe, Vietnam is the only country that has defeated all great powers and empires throughout thousands of years of history. and if there is World War 3, Vietnam will be the only white area left untouched.

    • @fabio5286
      @fabio5286 2 роки тому +3

      @@samtex2018 probably the Amazon as well, brazil defeated americans there too

    • @Un.kno.wn_evil
      @Un.kno.wn_evil 2 роки тому

      China's only a bit better at Navy and that's only because of their large fleet, still they fear US Navy. Their jets ain't superior as of the Western and the European 4th Gen. jets are and also they release tonnes of propaganda videos about their military but we know the reality. The reality is that they don't have any experience about the modern warfare and the last war they've participated was in 1975 during Vietnam war which also resulted in huge disappointment for the China. And also they don't have a bit of idea about alpine or mountain warfare. If the Tibetans joined with China then they would've created troubles for Indian soldiers in mountain warfare but the fact is Tibetans doesn't like China even a bit.

  • @Persephoniqua
    @Persephoniqua 3 роки тому +62

    REDS: Lose
    IRAN: I don't know these jokers

    • @Ari-ne2yb
      @Ari-ne2yb 2 роки тому +1

      "I was on your side from the get go hehehe"

  • @Kattalanonyt
    @Kattalanonyt 3 роки тому +244

    Seems like a great balance between the power and objectives of both sides and fun. Obviously not a war simulation but has enough accuracy to be reasonable while still being extremely interesting. I usually get turned off because mappers fail to have a good balance between the two but this video does this extremely well. This is probably my favorite mapping video as of now.

    • @ragingshibe
      @ragingshibe 2 роки тому +11

      I agree. Other versions unfortunately fall short in that regard cuz they'll either show Russia somehow managing to singlehandedly conquer all of Europe and still have enough energy to invade and make the U.S surrender or show NATO obliterating Russia even in the winter.

    • @samtex2018
      @samtex2018 2 роки тому

      The author is a person with cerebral palsy. Humans should remember, on this globe, Vietnam is the only country that has defeated all great powers and empires throughout thousands of years of history. and if there is World War 3, Vietnam will be the only white area left untouched.

    • @Kattalanonyt
      @Kattalanonyt 2 роки тому +5

      @@samtex2018 Vietnam has been occupied by china before.

    • @PrivateMcPrivate
      @PrivateMcPrivate 2 роки тому +1

      @@Kattalanonyt ye lol

  • @generalaustraliaball9404
    @generalaustraliaball9404 2 роки тому +41

    China and India would be notoriously difficult if not impossible to invade. Irl I think China and India wouldn't fall at all because you'd literally be up against at least 200 million soldiers, doesn't matter how disorganised or how many revolts there are there will still be enough nationalistic, patriotic civilians

    • @silverletter4551
      @silverletter4551 2 роки тому +3

      What will they be armed with? Sticks?

    • @alidokadri
      @alidokadri 2 роки тому +15

      @@silverletter4551 think about the Soviet Union in 1941, but much much greater numbers. There is no way China and India will be invaded, even if they did, they won't surrender.

    • @abhinavd_lol
      @abhinavd_lol 2 роки тому +1

      @@silverletter4551 China is the 3rd strongest and India is the 4th strongest country in the world so yeah what he's saying is kinda true, you can't actually invade India and China until and unless it's the whole NATO together. That's why some people believe that the USA does't want Asia to be a stable region, if that happens and India, China, Russia and Pakistan ended up being best buddies, it's nightmare for NATO.

    • @alidokadri
      @alidokadri 2 роки тому

      @SailorMoon yeah you're right it's more like a stereotype actually, but they were able to field a ridiculously high amount of soldiers later on...

    • @Ari-ne2yb
      @Ari-ne2yb 2 роки тому +1

      @SailorMoon Soviet union won because of its cold climate and extremely large, cold, dry and uninhabitable terrain.
      You're right, it didn't have that large of re-enforcements as it's now believed.

  • @wittyjp02
    @wittyjp02 3 роки тому +314

    You should do the peace treaties of both western and eastern victories

    • @ushopelife7538
      @ushopelife7538 3 роки тому +1

      GREATIEST PHENEMONELIEST MIRACLEIST BESTIEST OF THE BESTIEST IDEA EVER

    • @samtex2018
      @samtex2018 2 роки тому +1

      The author is a person with cerebral palsy. Humans should remember, on this globe, Vietnam is the only country that has defeated all great powers and empires throughout thousands of years of history. and if there is World War 3, Vietnam will be the only white area left untouched.

    • @samtex2018
      @samtex2018 2 роки тому +3

      @@ushopelife7538 The author is a person with cerebral palsy. Humans should remember, on this globe, Vietnam is the only country that has defeated all great powers and empires throughout thousands of years of history. and if there is World War 3, Vietnam will be the only white area left untouched.

    • @jacob414
      @jacob414 2 роки тому +1

      @@samtex2018 Dont think Vietnam is invincible, the US itself could’ve won if multiple things had happened (mostly before the tet offensive)

    • @xeno9889
      @xeno9889 11 місяців тому +1

      @@samtex2018this kid is a typical vietnamese nationalist

  • @manusa6
    @manusa6 3 роки тому +19

    Eastern powers: starts losing
    Iran: ok guys my mom called me gtg

    • @samtex2018
      @samtex2018 2 роки тому

      The author is a person with cerebral palsy. Humans should remember, on this globe, Vietnam is the only country that has defeated all great powers and empires throughout thousands of years of history. and if there is World War 3, Vietnam will be the only white area left untouched.

  • @tukatl
    @tukatl 3 роки тому +38

    Russia: **invades Poland**
    Germany: “Don’t do it, Deutschland, don’t do it…”

    • @hzchase7696
      @hzchase7696 2 роки тому +2

      LOL

    • @dolphingoreeaccount7395
      @dolphingoreeaccount7395 2 роки тому +3

      Lol
      I made a Minecraft world on an earth map. Everyone picked a country.
      I picked Germany.
      I built my "berlin" about 2-3 chunks too far east, right on the modern polish border.
      To stop somebody from claiming Poland and building too near my capital...
      I invaded.
      Nobody was there.
      I also invaded France (again, unclaimed) to find dyes for my German flag. I found them.
      In spain.

    • @stephmod7434
      @stephmod7434 2 роки тому +1

      @@dolphingoreeaccount7395 based lmao.

  • @oitubeman1019
    @oitubeman1019 3 роки тому +44

    Yoooo it’s him
    edit: I don’t think africa would get involved. Sure, there might be some proxy wars, but there would not be any fighting between the major powers in africa

    • @oitubeman1019
      @oitubeman1019 3 роки тому +3

      @@sn0wdon but it depends whether or not the eastern allience could get to their proxies by sea

    • @mapeditorjon5306
      @mapeditorjon5306 3 роки тому +4

      @@sn0wdon if they go to war, militia coups or terrorists will take over while their fighting which risks their country being torn apart so it's best to stay neutral and do what the global powers say

  • @austinreed5805
    @austinreed5805 3 роки тому +40

    It’s cool that you made two different endings.
    Also, great work on the video!

    • @samtex2018
      @samtex2018 2 роки тому +1

      The author is a person with cerebral palsy. Humans should remember, on this globe, Vietnam is the only country that has defeated all great powers and empires throughout thousands of years of history. and if there is World War 3, Vietnam will be the only white area left untouched.

  • @wongfeihung8718
    @wongfeihung8718 3 роки тому +37

    Looks good but I don't believe there's much point pushing north from Vladivostok. And India would not let the enemies get as far as here. Once they loose their momentum, they can't continue.

    • @walx274
      @walx274 3 роки тому +3

      Most of north western India is mostly flat , it would be very easy to push through against a retreating enemy with modern equipment
      The only way they could be stopped would be by a river slowing down their momentum, like in this video

    • @wongfeihung8718
      @wongfeihung8718 3 роки тому +5

      ​@@walx274 That is a good point. The combined attacking force is so massive they might break through hard at some point. However if you take a look at the Indian military deployments in the northern areas, you can see that it is full of major airfields and bases. It could turn out to be an enormous military disaster for the attackers.

    • @thepriestofvaranasi
      @thepriestofvaranasi 3 роки тому +5

      @@walx274 I don't think they would be able to hold the conquered lands for a long time because of the massive Indian native population. It's just impossible to conquer without killing all of them.

    • @firstnamelastname.7749
      @firstnamelastname.7749 2 роки тому +5

      @@walx274 but they couldn't get thru the Himalayas

  • @EPICoutcast24
    @EPICoutcast24 3 роки тому +31

    I wonder if there could be a third option, a horrific stalemate or internal collapse for both la USA y China

    • @oitubeman1019
      @oitubeman1019 3 роки тому +12

      how about a nuclear exchange? that’ll do the trick for both a draw and a horrific collapse of both of the powers

    • @oitubeman1019
      @oitubeman1019 3 роки тому

      @Lion Pro why?

    • @अण्वायुवरीवर्त
      @अण्वायुवरीवर्त 2 роки тому

      @@oitubeman1019 well then it depends on Russia
      The side Russia chooses will be victorious.

    • @samtex2018
      @samtex2018 2 роки тому

      The author is a person with cerebral palsy. Humans should remember, on this globe, Vietnam is the only country that has defeated all great powers and empires throughout thousands of years of history. and if there is World War 3, Vietnam will be the only white area left untouched.

  • @lzbscalle7943
    @lzbscalle7943 3 роки тому +17

    Sweden and Finland are formally allies, so if Russia took Gotland, Finland would join in too

  • @addis8077
    @addis8077 3 роки тому +104

    You should have shown the borders and results of the war...But I love this video anyway!

    • @alecxy1768
      @alecxy1768 3 роки тому +1

      agreed

    • @samtex2018
      @samtex2018 2 роки тому

      The author is a person with cerebral palsy. Humans should remember, on this globe, Vietnam is the only country that has defeated all great powers and empires throughout thousands of years of history. and if there is World War 3, Vietnam will be the only white area left untouched.

    • @EndlessGamerBlue-EG
      @EndlessGamerBlue-EG 2 роки тому

      Me too

  • @justinskirzenski
    @justinskirzenski 3 роки тому +23

    Cursed map. Greece and Armenia would never fight each other.

    • @stephmod7434
      @stephmod7434 3 роки тому +6

      TRUE

    • @Errorgamp404
      @Errorgamp404 3 роки тому

      Would you prefer Armenia ditching their biggest ally for the 2 countries they hate most? Azerbaijan and Turkey

    • @stephmod7434
      @stephmod7434 3 роки тому

      @@Errorgamp404 what?

  • @FrogToTheFrog
    @FrogToTheFrog 2 роки тому +20

    The real question is how did russia steamroll europe when they haven’t even take Ukraine irl 💀

    • @mrmerikin7049
      @mrmerikin7049 2 роки тому

      Ты действительно думаешь что Россия хочет взять всю Украину?

    • @tonuka6257
      @tonuka6257 2 роки тому +6

      @@mrmerikin7049 do you really think they can? Russians army fucking sucks, 7 months and they're losing on all fronts

    • @mrmerikin7049
      @mrmerikin7049 2 роки тому

      @@tonuka6257 насколько я понел ты хочешь сказать что Россия 7 месяце так и не взорвала всю Украину ,так и не разбомбили все города так и не заминировали всю территорию Украины?

    • @lmao.3661
      @lmao.3661 2 роки тому +1

      @@mrmerikin7049 they de jure annexed literally all of their occupied territory.

    • @laboot7447
      @laboot7447 2 роки тому +3

      @@mrmerikin7049 And yet the most strategic city of Kyiv was failed to be taken. Multiple months ago.

  • @sadhankumarghoshk.k2764
    @sadhankumarghoshk.k2764 2 роки тому +4

    China: Wants to Invade India
    The Himalayas: Lemme introduce myself

    • @arhumzia6360
      @arhumzia6360 2 роки тому

      Pakistan and other Chinese allies: YES

  • @neptune9238
    @neptune9238 Рік тому +3

    I noticed two inaccuracies:
    South Korea would not fall that quickly
    China would not just magically walk through the himalayas.

    • @PolnocMapping
      @PolnocMapping Рік тому

      I know! The Chinese obviously climbed up the mountains, and flew down to India!

  • @dimateadriaanm.1194
    @dimateadriaanm.1194 2 роки тому +13

    this is no longer realistic considering russia's performance in ukraine. well, even china going through the himalayas is uhh very impossible

    • @i_likemcdonalds7317
      @i_likemcdonalds7317 2 роки тому

      China Has been building infarstacture in the himalayas for years if not decades now

    • @dimateadriaanm.1194
      @dimateadriaanm.1194 2 роки тому +1

      @@i_likemcdonalds7317 but on the indian side. also the himalayas isnt tank land so i still doubt the speed

    • @i_likemcdonalds7317
      @i_likemcdonalds7317 2 роки тому +1

      @@dimateadriaanm.1194 yeah i can agree with that they went through the himalayas way too quick for my own taste aswell

    • @dolphingoreeaccount7395
      @dolphingoreeaccount7395 2 роки тому +2

      No, No
      This is the scenario where Musk decided "I should buy the Himalayas"
      And then he mines them all for Teslas

    • @stephmod7434
      @stephmod7434 2 роки тому

      Russia only have 10% of its army in Ukraine. XD

  • @krishnadas_3740
    @krishnadas_3740 3 роки тому +9

    i dont get why in every WW3 speculation video, half of India is always taken over by Chinese & Pakistani's forces . India geographically might be only one cornered by many but it's still not a weak nation. I dont know what factors many take in consideration when thinking about war between India & its neighbours.

  • @khantzayar4480
    @khantzayar4480 3 роки тому +9

    If they used nukes R.I.P Humanity

  • @Thunderous333
    @Thunderous333 3 роки тому +23

    The Good Ending

    • @ukusunter4835
      @ukusunter4835 3 роки тому +5

      Maybe it was good but still I hope that there will never come war between America and china and if comes then better on the pacific ocean because I don't want another world war in Europe. Another genocide by another mad imperialist.

    • @Thunderous333
      @Thunderous333 3 роки тому +10

      @@ukusunter4835 Obviously! Billions would die directly or indirectly because of it. But in the end, no matter the hate for the US and all its faults, it's still better than anything that could happen should China reign victorious.

    • @ukusunter4835
      @ukusunter4835 3 роки тому +3

      @@Thunderous333 Of course, it would be better if America, and democratic countries would win, and I don't hate America. Just I noticed that half of the Europe was red for some time even in this map. Certainly, billions would die anyways and that would be very sad, but if a war would take place on the Pacific ocean, fewer civilians would die and the dead would be troops from the countries that are fighting (in that case from America and china) Which would be a little fairer.

    • @Baard5Szomoru
      @Baard5Szomoru 3 роки тому +4

      the better ending, freedom, no chinese oppression

    • @firstnamelastname.7749
      @firstnamelastname.7749 2 роки тому +1

      The blessed ending

  • @JaxYTB
    @JaxYTB 3 роки тому +15

    Although this is very cartoony and ww2-esque its fun to see how a third-gen war would be like in today's geopolitical scene

  • @cheintze1
    @cheintze1 2 роки тому +27

    After witnessing the Russian military in action this last three months, I'm not even sure they could take Eastern Poland

    • @Aaron_Whg
      @Aaron_Whg 2 роки тому +1

      Lmao they cant even invade ukraine so yeah i doubt russia is strong

    • @stephmod7434
      @stephmod7434 2 роки тому +3

      @@Aaron_Whg the 300.000 soldiers didnt even arrive cope.

    • @Aaron_Whg
      @Aaron_Whg 2 роки тому

      Russia doesnt have any more modern weapons left.. they rely on old ww2 weapons

    • @tonuka6257
      @tonuka6257 2 роки тому

      Russia wouldn't take anything, NATO would secure St. Petersburg in a week

    • @kliffunger9629
      @kliffunger9629 Рік тому +1

      ​@@stephmod7434 arrived. What's next?

  • @michaelchristy5652
    @michaelchristy5652 3 роки тому +5

    Finally, a new ww3 video map to watch

  • @Narstak
    @Narstak 3 роки тому +10

    And then the western allies see in depth the horros done by the chinese regime like they never did before, a sad repetition of the last grand war a century ago...

  • @gustave9249
    @gustave9249 Рік тому +2

    I find this to be a lot more realistic than the Eastern Victory version , I don’t think China is capable of fighting a three front war in India , Korea and South East Asia and the Ukraine war has showed us that the Russian army isn’t as powerful as people had previously thought and so I doubt they would reach anywhere past Warsaw

  • @ZennonTheOne
    @ZennonTheOne Рік тому +2

    I always hate how people undemine South Korea. They can withstand a North Korean invasion, and even DEFEAT the North Korean military despite sheer numbers, it's a quality over quantity thing.

    • @alphapollete7733
      @alphapollete7733 Рік тому

      exactly, they have one of the strongest armies in the world and have been preparing for war since the 50's along with the US

    • @Tacticalerth
      @Tacticalerth Рік тому

      Nukes

    • @alphapollete7733
      @alphapollete7733 Рік тому

      @@Tacticalerth in case of the use of nukes from NK it would be obliderated by the us, its not any weapon that can be use without repercusion

    • @Tacticalerth
      @Tacticalerth Рік тому

      @alphapollete7733 it will turn south korea into wasteland

  • @ruscaliso
    @ruscaliso 2 роки тому +1

    Thanks for recommending this YT!

  • @HappyBazinga
    @HappyBazinga 3 роки тому +30

    Amazing i wonder what the peace treaty would look like

  • @briandenning4851
    @briandenning4851 3 роки тому +10

    What's with South Africa being part of the eastern powers?

  • @booperdooperproductions2545
    @booperdooperproductions2545 2 роки тому +4

    I feel like the war in Europe was unrealistic because it VASTLY underestimated the combined army strength Eastern European countries could wield, along with what civilian resistance could do. I also think Finland would not fall so easily.

  • @rqche6689
    @rqche6689 2 роки тому +12

    3:05 no way Russia could take Finland that quick

    • @Aureus_
      @Aureus_ 2 роки тому +4

      true

    • @Ari-ne2yb
      @Ari-ne2yb 2 роки тому +3

      Yeah it's struggling in Ukraine alone lol

  • @jaylesskuki
    @jaylesskuki 3 роки тому +3

    India: Never Back down 👍

  • @breaddog8122
    @breaddog8122 2 роки тому +15

    All of this is realistic , except for the Indian invasion through the Himalayas
    Also I learned that most of indian population lives near the Chinese border
    So I think that amount of speed of the invasion was off
    But other than that
    Great job man

    • @i_likemcdonalds7317
      @i_likemcdonalds7317 2 роки тому

      China Has been building infarstacture in the himalayas for years if not decades now

    • @billibhag
      @billibhag 2 роки тому +3

      @@i_likemcdonalds7317 you think so because you haven't seen the Himalayas in person. There's nothing in this planet that can cross the Himalayas without losing all its endurance. Chinesse soldiers need supplement oxygen to survive in lower parts of himalayas as of now.

    • @i_likemcdonalds7317
      @i_likemcdonalds7317 2 роки тому

      @@billibhag I never said that it would be easy to get through the Himalayas but the indians would have to move a lot of their forces to the Pakistan and Myanmar border since the bulk of Chinese forces would be in Pakistan as shown in the video. You might say that it's still really hard to get through the Himalayas. Don't get me wrong it's the biggest mountain range in the world but the Chinese can afford to lose a lot troops so they will be reputedly attacking untill a breakthrough happens and then they will put a huge amount of forces in there and keep on pushing further.
      Disclaimer: I don't know what would happen in a real war scenario but that makes sense to me

    • @dolphingoreeaccount7395
      @dolphingoreeaccount7395 2 роки тому

      @biki
      Except certain geese. But you can't weapon use them. They will simply peck you in the eyes.

  • @rkkasibhotla
    @rkkasibhotla 3 роки тому +6

    0:37 Pakistan wouldn’t join the war on EP side. They have a personal alliance with USA they would probably join on the WP side

    • @fuckeveryone3382
      @fuckeveryone3382 3 роки тому +14

      They are only de facto aligned with the us, in the event of war they would side with china, because india is pakistans mortal enemy, and because india would side with america against china, their are 0 ways pakistan would fight along side india. The only way pakistan would fight with the west, would be if india fought with china. The only reason the us still has a treaty with Pakistan is because we signed it with them as a counter balance to the soviet-aligned india of the time. And america has yet to adapt that well to the post cold war realities of the world.

    • @sagardyenchilwar8762
      @sagardyenchilwar8762 3 роки тому +1

      @@fuckeveryone3382
      Not really the case
      Pakistan being a pseudo militiaristic nation _its ideal are just "go with flow"
      They jump on sino side cause us stopped funding them
      In today's condition they have more dept than their gdp
      Recently china asked for loan they given
      In response pm of Pakistan requested for extension of due date to an year

    • @thepriestofvaranasi
      @thepriestofvaranasi 3 роки тому +1

      Pakistan won't have a choice. It would be more like China ordering its fellow colonies to join war against US allies. Pakistan is getting trapped in the debt trap of China and they will sooner or later take over Pakistan.

    • @MJJFilms
      @MJJFilms 2 роки тому

      Pakistan is China’s closest ally.

    • @gamingjedi52
      @gamingjedi52 2 роки тому +1

      This aged pretty bad.

  • @polishpierogi8093
    @polishpierogi8093 2 роки тому +4

    5:56 every world war must have its own Italy

  • @stilicho8762
    @stilicho8762 3 роки тому +33

    The more realistic ending...

    • @lazarous2772
      @lazarous2772 3 роки тому +5

      I agree

    • @thepriestofvaranasi
      @thepriestofvaranasi 3 роки тому

      Fr

    • @2n974
      @2n974 3 роки тому

      everybody dies

    • @wojak6793
      @wojak6793 3 роки тому +1

      No the realistic ending would be nuclear war and everyone dies

    • @DeathBringer138
      @DeathBringer138 3 роки тому +1

      the best thing is, putin was likely overthrown by a coup by alexei navalny(pro-Western Kremlin critic)

  • @filipdilmaghani9594
    @filipdilmaghani9594 Рік тому +3

    The fear before 2022 was that Russia would be able to be as effective as in this simulation. After 2022, it is clear that Russia couldn't invade its own foot if its life depended on it.

  • @josearmandoguerrerochairez3454
    @josearmandoguerrerochairez3454 3 роки тому +6

    Mexico: yo que chingados hago aqui, yo solo te vendo petróleo y carros.

  • @nooneasked726
    @nooneasked726 2 роки тому +2

    UA-cam recommending this in the worst time possible

  • @bulbs_
    @bulbs_ Рік тому +2

    Considering Russian performance in the Ukraine war I doubt they would even take Estonia, and Gotland would seem like an impenetrable fortress to them

    • @baileygregory9192
      @baileygregory9192 Рік тому

      Estonia would easily be taken even including they would just be over run by vastly support numbers. Compared to ukriane (were russia gained 1/5 of their territory equipment to 2/3 of the baltic) Estonia would be weaker plus the fact that it lacks alot of strategic depth plus the Russian only need to Capure a narrow corridor of land to cut then off

  • @ProGremlinPlayer
    @ProGremlinPlayer 3 роки тому +16

    I wish these two videos had some text or something detailing what the peace treaties did and how the borders shifted post-war.

  • @TheGamingCanadian
    @TheGamingCanadian 2 роки тому +4

    The invasion of Europe does not seem realistic. The Russian military is highly inefficient and would not be able to invade Poland

    • @oursukhoi9513
      @oursukhoi9513 2 роки тому +3

      Keep in mind this was made before the war in Ukraine, when people thought Russia was more powerful

    • @stephmod7434
      @stephmod7434 2 роки тому +1

      @@oursukhoi9513 the war in Ukraine started in 2014. This video was posted in 2021.

    • @stephmod7434
      @stephmod7434 Рік тому +1

      @MrFoxyzin no it mever started. It might start soon.

  • @ReiKun55
    @ReiKun55 2 роки тому +7

    1:02 nice predictions🤣

  • @acceleradiance3131
    @acceleradiance3131 3 роки тому +4

    2:13 rip sri lanka

  • @bubbafern
    @bubbafern 2 роки тому +5

    he predicted the future

  • @lividboo6472
    @lividboo6472 3 роки тому +3

    I like how you circle the areas that are being invaded

    • @samtex2018
      @samtex2018 2 роки тому

      The author is a person with cerebral palsy. Humans should remember, on this globe, Vietnam is the only country that has defeated all great powers and empires throughout thousands of years of history. and if there is World War 3, Vietnam will be the only white area left untouched.

  • @studgud3345
    @studgud3345 3 роки тому +10

    You should show the Casualties.

  • @white-bm6ck
    @white-bm6ck 2 роки тому +2

    Switzerland:13/10 would be neutral again ☕

  • @ricebro7044
    @ricebro7044 3 роки тому +2

    Bhutan: this is fine

  • @larik8977
    @larik8977 2 роки тому +6

    This did not age well

  • @monaevaathena9269
    @monaevaathena9269 2 роки тому +5

    LOOKING AT IT NOW, it's funny how RUSSIA here took almost all of UKRAINE in weeks while it's almost been a month and RUSSIA still don't have half of UKRAINE.

    • @user-es4lc2fe7o
      @user-es4lc2fe7o 2 роки тому +1

      it's funny to see American kids who seriously don't understand how many troops were involved.

    • @monaevaathena9269
      @monaevaathena9269 2 роки тому +3

      @@user-es4lc2fe7o it's bold of you to assume that I am American. Are you referring to me or the video creator ?
      I'm only talking about the large difference between irl and this video content.
      The idea that troops in this video are massive while irl it's even less than Ukraine's troops. That's the difference and it's quite funny looking back at it now.

  • @thesharpyion8030
    @thesharpyion8030 3 роки тому +4

    south Africa with the east??

  • @compatriot852
    @compatriot852 2 роки тому +2

    The invasion of India, Vietnam, and the Baltics are the only main things I see wrong considering going through the Himalayas and most heavily populated parts are extremely difficult. In the case of the Baltics, both Russia and Germany have had a lot of trouble dealing with the thick forests and swamps that makes mobilized/armor units difficult to go through plus gives an advantage to guerillas who can hide in large tunnel networks similar to Vietnam, which China always has had difficulty invading.

  • @nagaykei6611
    @nagaykei6611 2 роки тому

    I love the timing with UA-cam’s recommendation

  • @oursukhoi9513
    @oursukhoi9513 3 роки тому +4

    Other than China pushing that far into India the only thing I truly question is why Saudi Arabia fell so quickly I know the military isn’t quite as good as Iran’s but I doubt Iran would push that far into Saudi Arabia so quickly I think it would be a stalemate in the north for at least a little while

    • @Ari-ne2yb
      @Ari-ne2yb 2 роки тому

      You need to remember India would be facing a three front war. From Pakistan-china-Myanmar. It would be extremely difficult to defend it alone while EU and USA would be busy in the Russian front.
      Iran has the most powerful military in the Middle East along with Turkey. Although turkey is a NATO member it would not do much to defend UAE, since they have differences with it.
      Turkey would most probably sign a no agression treaty with Iran and divide the Arabian peninsula with one another.

  • @Vish250
    @Vish250 Рік тому +1

    seams like the most realistic ww3 scenario while not being boring af but the only thing that was really wierd was how china and pakistan got through the himalayas (pretty difficult terrain and India is quite a bit more powerfull than in the video) so easily and why there wasn't much western support there

  • @the_dragon_gamer8850
    @the_dragon_gamer8850 2 роки тому +2

    Given the recent events in Ukraine, it demonstrates that the Russian forces won’t be nearly as good at gaining advances on all front as this scenario shows.

  • @Sejara1528
    @Sejara1528 2 роки тому

    A correction, Malaysia and Singapore will join GB because of FPDA.

  • @FlocAud4914
    @FlocAud4914 3 роки тому +16

    The good ending.

  • @Neidhard-von-Reuenthal
    @Neidhard-von-Reuenthal 2 роки тому +1

    Lol Austria is just chillin

  • @IVaV1
    @IVaV1 3 роки тому +6

    I know this is alternate, and its a pretty good video, however 1 thing I don't understand is how Tajikistan joins China's side, despite China claiming half their land.

    • @oitubeman1019
      @oitubeman1019 3 роки тому +1

      they are forced into joining the EP because they are surrounded by fellow EP members

    • @IVaV1
      @IVaV1 3 роки тому +1

      @@oitubeman1019 sure, but india has a military base in tajikistan, and the two have good relations, and they could still make tajikistan fall really quickly, doesn't mean they won't try. Poland was surrounded by nazi germany and the ussr and they still tried to defend against them because they had bad relations with them

    • @thepriestofvaranasi
      @thepriestofvaranasi 3 роки тому

      China would eventually claim all of the land of Tajikistan and that's it, they're on eastern side.

    • @IVaV1
      @IVaV1 3 роки тому

      @@thepriestofvaranasi ...what

    • @Errorgamp404
      @Errorgamp404 3 роки тому

      Tajikistan is a member of Russias military alliance, CSTO. Therefore they join the war on EP's side.

  • @mrboom303
    @mrboom303 2 роки тому +2

    That was epic do it again do it again

  • @ronanlewis6119
    @ronanlewis6119 3 роки тому +2

    Can't believe I didn't know WW3 was happening!

  • @Holymackarel_babadoogaming123
    @Holymackarel_babadoogaming123 3 роки тому +1

    0:44 top 10 greatest anime betrayals
    Coming at #1 Vietnam

  • @pacoramon9468
    @pacoramon9468 3 роки тому +3

    Cuba is the real winner here.

  • @tomnguyenthetrain
    @tomnguyenthetrain 2 роки тому +2

    Well this is ironic

  • @Redcliffe_
    @Redcliffe_ 3 роки тому +8

    Is this your biggest mapping project so far?

  • @glaciatedluxray2849
    @glaciatedluxray2849 2 роки тому +2

    Having Laos and Cambodia join the Chinese side sounds realistic, but that would require them to turn on one of their main Allie’s, Vietnam, which I don’t think they’d do

    • @Blankskeen
      @Blankskeen 2 роки тому +1

      The relationship between Cambodia and Vietnam is strained. I can see Cambodia siding with China over Vietnam.

    • @KolchaksGhost
      @KolchaksGhost 2 роки тому

      Why do you guys think geopolitics and international warfare is about who is and who isn’t your friends? You place a lot of faith in corrupt third world authoritarian governments if you think they’ll openly side against China because of “good relations” with Vietnam

    • @glaciatedluxray2849
      @glaciatedluxray2849 2 роки тому

      @@KolchaksGhost I never said they’d side against China

    • @KolchaksGhost
      @KolchaksGhost 2 роки тому

      @@glaciatedluxray2849 as if China would let them be neutral

    • @glaciatedluxray2849
      @glaciatedluxray2849 2 роки тому

      @@KolchaksGhost China would be busy fighting a bunch of other countries. Trying to force a country they don’t even border to join their side would be quite difficult. Laos and Cambodia would have more to gain from being neutral

  • @MyAQAZ
    @MyAQAZ 2 роки тому +4

    Since russians have invaded Ukraine we all know that their military "power" isn't strong enough to push into Ukraine alone, so I guess we are safe af in Europe. The map basically needs some changes since last thursday XD

    • @sd1082
      @sd1082 2 роки тому

      How are u doing now broo....

  • @blackphoenix3220
    @blackphoenix3220 3 роки тому +4

    Epic.

  • @thelegendarytea6347
    @thelegendarytea6347 2 роки тому +5

    I had one, not even three questions about the realism of this scenario. 1. How can China invade India through the Himalayas, yes it is possible, but it is geographic suicide. The offensive may result in heavy losses among the Chinese army. 2. How did the forces of the "West" seize Crimea? Russia has a fleet in Crimea, it is powerful enough to repel NATO attacks. Yes, and in general, Russia can withdraw Turkey on the very first day of the war, hitting Ankara with Russian missiles. 3. Why is the West not attacking the Caucasus? I understand the Russian government and people most likely do not want to wage wars with a friendly people. But this is stupid - not to attack Russian reserves of resources.

    • @marcangelocamoro2845
      @marcangelocamoro2845 2 роки тому

      Well the nato command orders to destroy the ports and starts an landing operation with full air support and naval support

    • @thelegendarytea6347
      @thelegendarytea6347 2 роки тому

      @@marcangelocamoro2845 I mean, despite the fleet and aviation in Russia, there are excellent air defense and missile launchers.
      The first ones provide protection from a certain amount of otak aviation, and the second ones will take Turkey out of the war in a few hours - I think the Turkish people would not want to be under fire. So anti-NATO rallies will begin in Turkey

    • @thelegendarytea6347
      @thelegendarytea6347 2 роки тому

      Yes, and Russia is not so easy to withdraw from the war and win over to its side. Knowing the strength of the Russian spirit, as a Russian, I am offended that Russia has been taken out of the game for such a period of time.

    • @marcangelocamoro2845
      @marcangelocamoro2845 2 роки тому

      @@thelegendarytea6347 yup but they will start bombing campaign first before landing operation and naval mission codename operation crimea

    • @dolphingoreeaccount7395
      @dolphingoreeaccount7395 2 роки тому

      I think they DID attack the Caucasus, they just didn't really get anywhere

  • @Malik-ro8bo
    @Malik-ro8bo 2 роки тому +2

    USA ,CHAINA ,RUSSIA AFGHANISTAN,INDIA MIGHT BE LEFT WITH SOME MORE COUNTRIES , I HOPE IT NEVER HAPPENS, LETS PEACE LETS SAFE THIS WORLD ,.

  • @MarvinUllmann
    @MarvinUllmann 2 роки тому +2

    Why did South Africa join the East?

  • @Sherbazkhan11
    @Sherbazkhan11 2 роки тому +3

    this aged well...

  • @aryanshukla7305
    @aryanshukla7305 2 роки тому +3

    I m not sure how an army or a person manages to cross the Himalayas on land

    • @alexjavi7849
      @alexjavi7849 2 роки тому

      Lol

    • @alexjavi7849
      @alexjavi7849 2 роки тому

      I think India is in a really good position

    • @aryanshukla7305
      @aryanshukla7305 2 роки тому +1

      @@alexjavi7849 I know all we need is a moat and we r good to be impenetrable without an army

    • @Ari-ne2yb
      @Ari-ne2yb 2 роки тому

      @@aryanshukla7305 But we'll be facing a 3 front war. Pak-Myanmar and China. What if even Bangladesh joins chinese? We'll be fucked then.
      We can defend from China or Pakistan individually. But a combination of that with Myanmar and possibly Bangladesh is impossible.
      At least Delhi would be impossible to defend.

    • @aryanshukla7305
      @aryanshukla7305 2 роки тому

      @@Ari-ne2yb Islamabad is 100 miles from kashmir it ll be over in a few days while turn our attention to China which can't send large armies cause Himalayas tibetan plateau and the fact that the indians are on the passes plus no air land support for them either Not to mention us cutting off their trade and it's impossible to get a large army through the Himalayas as For bdesh the Indian intervention took 13 days while for myanmar they are in no position to wage war plus don't forget the we are the only powerful western ally on the Asian mainland for the west they can't afford to lose us

  • @Yutte3k
    @Yutte3k 2 роки тому +1

    One thing that would be interesting to see if WW3 happens, is that Germany and France would most likely be on the same side, which would mean Switzerland may not be neutral.

    • @marcangelocamoro2845
      @marcangelocamoro2845 2 роки тому

      I think that would be good that so the swiss military can fight after many years being neutral

  • @MemeEscaper
    @MemeEscaper 2 роки тому +2

    at 1:03 you predicted a war on ukraine

  • @TheEnderknight
    @TheEnderknight 2 роки тому

    Surprisingly relevant

  • @MysticAnimations
    @MysticAnimations 2 роки тому +2

    I don't think Russia would be able to attack that dep into Europe, at best they might be able to subjucate the baltics but thats still 'At Best'

    • @MysticAnimations
      @MysticAnimations 2 роки тому +2

      Also, after the war Russia owns the Donbass now?

  • @aircraftandmore9775
    @aircraftandmore9775 2 роки тому +1

    to be honest, since sometimes the united states and canadas weather are similar to russias winter, not even winter could stop us from taking them over

    • @dolphingoreeaccount7395
      @dolphingoreeaccount7395 2 роки тому

      DEFINITELY canada.
      The USA could probably also get quite a few winter soldiers; Russia is known for being cold, but here in the USA it can reach Antarctic temperatures (at the same time of year, Antarctica warms up just enough for human habitation, meaning there are times when Minnesota or Montana are colder than large parts of Antarctica)
      However, I don't live in those parts of the US.

  • @Aureus_
    @Aureus_ 2 роки тому

    Very good timing

  • @nopeyt3387
    @nopeyt3387 2 роки тому +2

    How did Russia take finland so easily? And the Himalayas got rushed

  • @T--kq3pj
    @T--kq3pj 2 роки тому +6

    Expectation: this video.
    Reality: russia couldn't handle donbass region of Ukraine for 6 months alrady.

    • @stephmod7434
      @stephmod7434 2 роки тому +1

      You know Donbas is defended really good?

    • @T--kq3pj
      @T--kq3pj 2 роки тому +1

      @@stephmod7434 cope

    • @stephmod7434
      @stephmod7434 2 роки тому +1

      @@T--kq3pj i admit that i though it would fall easier. But be honest, both sides entreched it very well.

    • @eastprussiaproductions
      @eastprussiaproductions 2 роки тому

      @@stephmod7434 this aged like milk

    • @stephmod7434
      @stephmod7434 2 роки тому

      @@eastprussiaproductions wdym? Both sides entreched Donbas.

  • @revolter7094
    @revolter7094 Рік тому +1

    In a realistic scenario, many countries would be neutral like India. South Africa or Brazil.

    • @debater452
      @debater452 Рік тому

      Why

    • @ChineseJohnCena
      @ChineseJohnCena 9 місяців тому

      Brics is a trading alliance
      And India would most likely be western, even though they have good relations with Russia, they hate or dislike many eastern allies like North Korea, Pakistan, China and Iran
      So India would be western

  • @tazmoir
    @tazmoir 2 роки тому +2

    Seems very inspired by whatifalthists video

  • @randomguyhere6061
    @randomguyhere6061 Рік тому

    For any comments on Russian military strength, this video was made in June 2021, back when we all still thought Russia was a major military threat and not a laughingstock of a military.

  • @FlyingDogWaffle
    @FlyingDogWaffle Рік тому

    Imagine all the people in 2100 actually thinking this is true

  • @ekszentrik
    @ekszentrik 2 роки тому +10

    I have a few things to critique, but what definitely would never in a million years happen is that Iran could just peace out with the West and keep their conquests (especially if it's still the Islamic Republic, but even if not). The West would land there at the gulf, easily conquer it, and then install some new democratic regime and either de facto partition Saudi Arabia or say "Friendship ended with Saudi Arabia" and quickly subdue the Saudis and transfer the entire country to the democratic half..

    • @samtex2018
      @samtex2018 2 роки тому

      The author is a person with cerebral palsy. Humans should remember, on this globe, Vietnam is the only country that has defeated all great powers and empires throughout thousands of years of history. and if there is World War 3, Vietnam will be the only white area left untouched.

    • @dolphingoreeaccount7395
      @dolphingoreeaccount7395 2 роки тому

      As I recall... the last guy to really, truly conquer Iran was Alexander the Great. Same for Afghanistan.

    • @dolphingoreeaccount7395
      @dolphingoreeaccount7395 2 роки тому

      Mountains and desert combined are very harsh terrain.

    • @ekszentrik
      @ekszentrik 2 роки тому

      @@dolphingoreeaccount7395 True, but they don't need to conquer the worthless sand areas, just Jeddah, the rest of the coast, and Mecca, perhaps Medina if its administration doesn't willingly switch.
      The rest is, as with any conquest, an exercise of the people in the other areas saying "this is stupid." and drop their weapons they didn't even use, and switch to the new regime.

  • @minhquanvuong7806
    @minhquanvuong7806 Рік тому

    Vietnam during ww3 be like:
    *I go to jungle and do guerrilla tactic*

  • @lucasguenesmenezes6416
    @lucasguenesmenezes6416 3 роки тому +1

    Russia: *fails into defeating Berlin*
    Germany: ah yes: REVENGE!!!

    • @Ari-ne2yb
      @Ari-ne2yb 2 роки тому +1

      "The seige of Moscow"

  • @thesharpyion8030
    @thesharpyion8030 3 роки тому +1

    great video 😍😍

  • @zhcultivator
    @zhcultivator 2 роки тому +1

    good video

  • @WarRobotDoge
    @WarRobotDoge 2 роки тому +1

    I don’t think South Africa would be an eastern power

  • @adityakailash8391
    @adityakailash8391 3 роки тому +2

    This is not the case in reality a ground invasion of india would have first been fought by land and air until delhi collapsed after it would have india woild have launched icbm's at pakistan and chinese cities to wipeout their chances of winning the war

  • @devin8811
    @devin8811 3 роки тому

    Everyone: Germany, NO!
    Germany: What?

  • @Taschip
    @Taschip 2 роки тому +2

    Lol after recent months, ain't no way Ukraine would have fallen that fast

  • @flamingoxe5984
    @flamingoxe5984 3 роки тому +1

    looks about right

  • @Terranallias18
    @Terranallias18 2 роки тому

    Interesting how western victory leads to continued American hegemony and Eastern victory probably leads to a cold war depending on who's willing.