You advised "subscribe for free" but, when subscribe is selected, we get " Armed Scholar $4.99/month " Join Recurring payment. Cancel anytime. Creator may update perks.
In 2022, Justice Thomas made the decision that any refrence to gun restrictions had to go back to when gun laws were first made in the 1700's. There were no restrictions in the 1700's when the laws were first made and therefore all of todays gun restrictions are unconstitutional.
It also says trump is automatically disqualified from being President but that shit doesn't seem to bother you so quit pretending that you give a shit about the Costitution.
There is no reason California and New York should have any say over law in the Midwest. Different cultures, different peoples, may as well be different countries.
These Liberal politicians will continue to violate the 2nd until the people vote them out of office. The Republicans in Congress have the power to pass a law that allows Americans to own whatever arms they want and carry them in all States. Constitutional Carry is important and needs to be a federal law!
These conservative nazis are ridiculousl and hypocritical rightwingers that do not believe in constitutional law or any other American activities , just worshipping dipshit trump and owning the LIBERALS.
We need laws for politicians and judges who make and uphold laws that are deemed unconstitutional. Evidently it's lawful to take peoples rights! What bull....!
@ I’ve been watching with disgust for years over this slide left in the courts. But I felt like SCOTUS came out with some pretty strong rulings recently that would have made it much harder for the lower courts to subvert but I am continually dumbfounded by the temerity of these left wing activist judges and how they can justify these rulings. Probably shouldn’t be surprised anymore. It’s just disappointing. I thought we had them cornered.
@@chesslover8829 I feel like the founding fathers expected people to be more independent so we would not fall as a nation to Unconstitutional doctrine. 1803 Marbury v Madison said Any law repugnant to the Constitution is null and void, that laws could not be passed if they were not Constitutional and any lower courts were also able to strike down laws they find Unconstitutional.
So the three judge panel is blocking the case from moving forward by telling the district judge that his decision isn't up to their so-called standard. This will go on indefinitely because they can violate the rights of citizens with no consequences.
@chesslover8829 it makes no sense and can be dismissed simply on the basis of when this stuff was written we had just finished fighting a war against a government where our quote unquote military-grade weapons were weapons owned by the citizens including the battle rifles in the cannons and the warships
@@outcomeagentAnd the dumbest thing about using that argument for trying to go after the types they are, is that these "military" weapons adopted by the military, were all civilian marketed arms first. Then the military wants to adopt a new arm, they solicit entries from the manufacturer which are already being sold to civilians, do the trials, select one, then poof... A new "military" weapon. M-16 was the Armalite Rifle on civilian market first. Beretta 92 became the M9. Sig P-320 became the M-18, M-17. I had a P-320 way before the military chose it. Just stupid.
@@outcomeagent I agree. It does not make sense. The Second Amendment protects the Constitution and the freedom and liberty of we the people. Many lower court judges do not support liberty for people like you and me; they support our obedience to the government at the expense of our freedom.
They never used to argue that weapons suitable for Military use were bannable. They argued, quite the opposite, that Handguns were bannable because the Second Amendment only covered weapons suitable for Military use, citing Miller v US. They totally abandoned this argument when they Discovered Assault Weapons in the 80s.
If they allow the use of the “for military use” they could be handguns, shot guns, bolt action rifles, as the military uses all of those. We need them to clearly strike down the “military use test” all together.
Since when can an appeals court direct a lower court judge to change his decision? If I were the judge, I would revise my decision, with "2A Rights Shall NOT Be Infinged!"
Why don't all you Constitution believers feel as strongly about section 3 of the 14th amendment that bars trumpshit from being President, but here we are. Can you say hypocrisy 101 ?
Amendment II A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
@@KirkPatrick-t2x I think your close, to me it says, we need guns because we are the civilian army. In Federalist No. 46, Madison wrote how a federal army could be kept in check by the militia, "a standing army ... would be opposed [by] militia." He argued that State governments "would be able to repel the danger" of a federal army, "It may well be doubted, whether a militia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a proportion of regular troops." He contrasted the federal government of the United States to the European kingdoms, which he described as "afraid to trust the people with arms", and assured that "the existence of subordinate governments ... forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition".
@@AdamosDadPOLICE ARE THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL STANDING ARMY! They are used AGAINST us every time GOVERNMENT wants to FORCE THE PEOPLE to BOW as SLAVES to LEGAL FICTION STATE authority!
It’s simple! Stop obeying unconstitutional laws and own what you want. You know exactly what to do against a tyrannical government that comes for your guns.
Easier said than done. Can't even get SIG to send 9" pistol barrel to IL because $hitcago says it COULD be used to make a SBR. Good luck getting anything fun in IL.
Because the court can only rule on the issues of the case brought before it. Court: No. State: Well, what about . . .? Court: No! State: What if we . . .? Court: NO! etc.
We need a hard line constitutional review court, which I thought was the Supreme Court. Any judge found violating any right needs to be removed from the bench, disbarred, fined, and imprisoned for crimes against the Constitution. Do that and see how fast these judges will fall in line and stop playing their games. I got a really great idea, extended this to all politicians, lawyers, law enforcement and all of their allies. When that fails, we all need to get organized and utilized our 1st and 2nd amendment rights to their fullest and force it.
They're purposely kicking the can back-and-forth, just to drag it out. They have no intention of fixing anything. They're just going to keep bouncing back-and-forth like they're doing something
Military style weapons were in the 2 amendment as being provided by members drawn from the US population. I believe every weapon is allowed under the second amendment but understand that explosives might push it a little.
I am not an attorney but it seems to me the law suits should be directed at the state itself for denial of rights.. I think this endless bs must come with an end .maybe the state should be sanctioned in some way.. or charged with sedition as their job is to protect and defend the constitution and their actions are in direct defiance of their oath
Heres the thing with this "military use test". When the Second Amendment was written and ratified in 1791, the only weapons a civillian could own WERE THE WEAPONS USED BY THE MILITARY! The military used flintlock muzzle loaders, and civillians were allowed to own flintlock muzzleloaders.
It was a requirement that local municipalities maintain powder, flints, and shot stores for use not only by the militia, but the Continental Army also. Some larger towns even had cannons, powder, shell and shot. Civilians were required to have at least one military grade shoulder weapon per family. Imagine if today every family in America had at least one belt fed machine gun, or fully automatic rifle, or grenade launcher, etc. in keeping with the tradition of the original government. How far we have fallen...smh
Well, actually, inalienable rights are granted by God. The Constitution only defines or specifies what's already a natural human right availed to us by the almighty.
Ya, well he seems to be the only concerned with classifying the 2A as second class right. Being that they kicked the can down the road again on the Snopes case, which would have settled these cases.
Anyone denying anyone else of ANY of their constitutional rights should be jailed. See how they'd like it if their right to free speech was removed. I bet then they'd care.
Really Illinois does want these weapons on the street. Have they seen Chicago lately. If the law abiding citizens could defend themselves with there lawfully purchased guns could protect themselves with them. They do not know anything about military weapons.
I'm pretty done with the lawfare part of this. State pass restrictive laws. We danced up and down the courtroom steps for 10 years. The second amendment gets upheld. State passes the same law again but this time with an extra, or a couple of extra words in the whole process repeats. Meanwhile the statues allowed to be enforced while it's being litigated. This needs to work the other way until the laws upheld it should not be enforced
As a beginner, it is essential that you have a mentor to help you stay accountable. In my case, Elizabeth Marie Hawley has guided me for months and I highly recommend her. I focus on her. To be honest, I'm almost hesitant to let someone take charge of growing my finances, but I'm so glad I did.
You're correct!! I make a lot of money without relying on the government. Investing in stocks, BTC, and XRP and digital currencies is beneficial at this moment.
I'm desperate to turn my finances around. I've been working three jobs just to pay off debt. Can someone please share contact or information? I need her help. A
Just be open-minded, and trust the process. Elizabeth Marie Hawley will guide you every step of the way. And don't forget to share your testimony with others when you see the results
In short 7th circuit is making the process take as long as possible. Until Supreme Court rules on this or other cases related nothing is going to happen.
I am so sick of this bouncing back and forth between courts. It’s rediculous and it’s all happening because librards Don’t like any guns at all. That’s the only reason. I say screw all of them . Buy what you want
I am from NC and got stationed in Northern New York met my wife and now I live here permanently. I am just wondering if there is any chance the Supreme Court can step in and force Hochul to restore our 2nd amendment rights. I mean this is absolutely insane. I can't even get a Marlin Model 60 22 without first getting a very intrusive pistol permit. I am completely beside myself because I am a collector and I can't really get very much at all. They also make you get a background check for antiques.
ASKING A CORPORATE EMPLOYEE PIG FOR PERMISSION, IS AN ACT OF TREASON! I WILL NOT ASK A CORPORATE COP FFOR PERMISSION TO BUY/OWN/POSSESS A DAMN GUN! THD COP CAN NOT LEGALLY CARRY EITHER, AS THEY ARE CORPORATE EMPLOYEES, DENIED ALL AUTHORITY AND RECOGNITION UNDER COMMON LAW...THEY HOLD ZERO JURISDICTION IN OUR REALM!
I don't have an M4 platform, previously known as the AR15; even though AR stands for Armalite. My semi-auto rifle is a 7.62x51 nato round firing semi-auto rifle. It's round is supersonic beyond 1100 yards, much like any bolt action .308 hunting rifle is. Is it an assault rifle? I do have 30 round mags for it, but I would never use it for home defense because the round would go through the perp, across the street, through that building, and traveling onward unless it contacted concrete walls I suppose. I favor my 12 gauge semi-auto shotgun that is loaded with 00 buckshot, containing roughly 12 pellets the size of nine mm rounds all moving at 1200 fps. It won't however, travel downrange like the above described rifle. That HK rifle is certainly a serious weapon, but it's not an automatic weapon like any military grade weapon usually is.
These circuit court judges need to face punishment for decisions they KNOW are unconstitutional but go against THEIR beliefs but not law,. Removal from the bench an disbarment at the least, if not prison time for the likes of the 7th circuit with its history of repeated offences. Without consequences they will just keep doing the same thing.
It appears that SCOTUS denies cert if they believe they will see it again AFTER a review on merits. Which means they are simply saying "come back when due process has completed." I can't get worked up about them saying "in due time."
What a fuster cluck! Keep letting stated flagrantly ignore previous rulings and the Bill of Rights. Live free and ignore the tyrants. Our compliance is their strength.
I had heard that there's a difference between what firearms are available to the general public and what the military is issued. Besides the militaries being issued firearms being able to fire single shots, fully automatic, and some can fire in three round bursts, while the firearms sold to the general public can't. Maybe there are some other differences.This would make the argument about firearms available to the general public, being military weapons moot.
Support the channel by liking the video and subscribing!
You advised "subscribe for free" but, when subscribe is selected, we get " Armed Scholar
$4.99/month "
Join
Recurring payment. Cancel anytime. Creator may update perks.
In 2022, Justice Thomas made the decision that any refrence to gun restrictions had to go back to when gun laws were first made in the 1700's. There were no restrictions in the 1700's when the laws were first made and therefore all of todays gun restrictions are unconstitutional.
One constitution, one bill of rights, 50 states, 50 laws.. the right to bear arms, shall not be infringed!
50 laws?
It also says trump is automatically disqualified from being President but that shit doesn't seem to bother you so quit pretending that you give a shit about the Costitution.
@@richardhudson8527you’re incorrect. He was never convicted of inciting any so called insurrection.
There is no reason California and New York should have any say over law in the Midwest. Different cultures, different peoples, may as well be different countries.
These Liberal politicians will continue to violate the 2nd until the people vote them out of office.
The Republicans in Congress have the power to pass a law that allows Americans to own whatever arms they want and carry them in all States. Constitutional Carry is important and needs to be a federal law!
These conservative nazis are ridiculousl and hypocritical rightwingers that do not believe in constitutional law or any other American activities , just worshipping dipshit trump and owning the LIBERALS.
@@billberryman3677 I read a Fox News article that showed republican politicians right now have a bill written to stop the bans on AR15s.
I have grown tired of all these usurpations of rights.
We need laws for politicians and judges who make and uphold laws that are deemed unconstitutional. Evidently it's lawful to take peoples rights! What bull....!
They are all in breach of their oath of office... To defend and uphold the constitution
Without consequences the likes of loss of position, disbarment, and prison time I do not see them changing their modus operandi.
How bout 1776 "
For All Benedict Arnolds "
The Gallows !"
I feel like these lower courts keep making the same rulings that clearly go against the supreme court’s rulings.
.....this just occurred to you?
@ I’ve been watching with disgust for years over this slide left in the courts. But I felt like SCOTUS came out with some pretty strong rulings recently that would have made it much harder for the lower courts to subvert but I am continually dumbfounded by the temerity of these left wing activist judges and how they can justify these rulings. Probably shouldn’t be surprised anymore. It’s just disappointing. I thought we had them cornered.
Cockroaches 🪳🪳 are hard to corner.
@@chesslover8829
I feel like the founding fathers expected people to be more independent so we would not fall as a nation to Unconstitutional doctrine.
1803 Marbury v Madison said Any law repugnant to the Constitution is null and void, that laws could not be passed if they were not Constitutional and any lower courts were also able to strike down laws they find Unconstitutional.
So the three judge panel is blocking the case from moving forward by telling the district judge that his decision isn't up to their so-called standard. This will go on indefinitely because they can violate the rights of citizens with no consequences.
@@gishjalmr5628 and the funny part is,,,, they supposedly work for us!!🤣
Does this circus never end?
Not in your lifetime.
No
Nope
Nope. They are like a two year old child that didn’t get their way and are throwing a tantrum.
thats the neat part! Nope!
My question is where in the f*** is this military use test coming from where does it say that anywhere in the Constitution?
It's a twisted interpretation of Miller.
@chesslover8829 it makes no sense and can be dismissed simply on the basis of when this stuff was written we had just finished fighting a war against a government where our quote unquote military-grade weapons were weapons owned by the citizens including the battle rifles in the cannons and the warships
@@outcomeagentAnd the dumbest thing about using that argument for trying to go after the types they are, is that these "military" weapons adopted by the military, were all civilian marketed arms first. Then the military wants to adopt a new arm, they solicit entries from the manufacturer which are already being sold to civilians, do the trials, select one, then poof... A new "military" weapon. M-16 was the Armalite Rifle on civilian market first. Beretta 92 became the M9. Sig P-320 became the M-18, M-17. I had a P-320 way before the military chose it. Just stupid.
@@outcomeagent I agree. It does not make sense. The Second Amendment protects the Constitution and the freedom and liberty of we the people. Many lower court judges do not support liberty for people like you and me; they support our obedience to the government at the expense of our freedom.
On top of that no military currently use or have ever used an AR15.
In 1791, ALL arms were suitable for military use.
The original American navy was mostly private warships.
You were actually required to provide your own arms in service to the militia.....
They still are. Any and all modern arms could be used in military if so chosen.
They never used to argue that weapons suitable for Military use were bannable. They argued, quite the opposite, that Handguns were bannable because the Second Amendment only covered weapons suitable for Military use, citing Miller v US. They totally abandoned this argument when they Discovered Assault Weapons in the 80s.
@@jimmybob7028 He means the People should be able to have machine guns, not that the Army could technically use muskets. GOOD LORD.
Why doesn't the Supreme Court enforce the Second Amendment once and for all!?
Why don't they enforce the 14th amendment section 3 that very clearly bans shit smelling trumputin from the Presidency ??????
@@Horsedrawn I agree.
If they allow the use of the “for military use” they could be handguns, shot guns, bolt action rifles, as the military uses all of those. We need them to clearly strike down the “military use test” all together.
Tyranny with extra steps?
Wild. What a country. It's like they warned us.
At this point why does anyone comply?
Laws wrtten by man are to be ignored lest you give them permission.. Act with impunity is what I'm reading.
@@hateca1 that’s a great question.
When are these stupid clowns going to stop infringing on our freedoms! “Shall not be infringed “ ! Period!
WE ALLOW COURTS.THAT IS WHY!
When enough of us demand that the judges making these unconstitutional ruling face trail and prison for making them.
Do these judges ever get a rule in place? Why are judgements always going to go back to court? So tired of this constant indecision!
No limits on 2A!!! Not 1
Judge McGlynn’s only mistake was giving the state 30 days. Their appeal came in after the 30 days iirc as well.
Since when can an appeals court direct a lower court judge to change his decision? If I were the judge, I would revise my decision, with "2A Rights Shall NOT Be Infinged!"
Why don't all you Constitution believers feel as strongly about section 3 of the 14th amendment that bars trumpshit from being President, but here we are. Can you say hypocrisy 101 ?
Amendment II
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state,
the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
Translation: because we need a Militia (army) and because THEY have guns the PEOPLE can have the SAME guns (as the army).
@@KirkPatrick-t2x I think your close, to me it says, we need guns because we are the civilian army. In Federalist No. 46, Madison wrote how a federal army could be kept in check by the militia, "a standing army ... would be opposed [by] militia." He argued that State governments "would be able to repel the danger" of a federal army, "It may well be doubted, whether a militia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a proportion of regular troops." He contrasted the federal government of the United States to the European kingdoms, which he described as "afraid to trust the people with arms", and assured that "the existence of subordinate governments ... forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition".
@@AdamosDadPOLICE ARE THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL STANDING ARMY!
They are used AGAINST us every time GOVERNMENT wants to FORCE THE PEOPLE to BOW as SLAVES to LEGAL FICTION STATE authority!
It’s simple! Stop obeying unconstitutional laws and own what you want. You know exactly what to do against a tyrannical government that comes for your guns.
Easier said than done. Can't even get SIG to send 9" pistol barrel to IL because $hitcago says it COULD be used to make a SBR. Good luck getting anything fun in IL.
That's our right and DUTY.
@duff60901 There are vays of going elsevhere for your pew pew tools!
It sickens me all the corrupt judges
Why is the Supreme Court. Not settling this
We the people Fed up
You’re still asking why?
@@Dgtrscn Seems so since his question begins with the word (WHY).
Because they don't care about protecting the Second Amendment.
Because the court can only rule on the issues of the case brought before it.
Court: No.
State: Well, what about . . .?
Court: No!
State: What if we . . .?
Court: NO!
etc.
@@jackiemowery5243except it's not only the state that bring the question before the court. They have at many points kicked this can down the street.
Any ruling that supports 2A IS NOT in error
Love the updates! Excellent analysis!!
This most important weapons for civilians to own, are ones that are for military use.
We need a hard line constitutional review court, which I thought was the Supreme Court. Any judge found violating any right needs to be removed from the bench, disbarred, fined, and imprisoned for crimes against the Constitution. Do that and see how fast these judges will fall in line and stop playing their games. I got a really great idea, extended this to all politicians, lawyers, law enforcement and all of their allies. When that fails, we all need to get organized and utilized our 1st and 2nd amendment rights to their fullest and force it.
Live Uninfringed
🇺🇸👍
They're purposely kicking the can back-and-forth, just to drag it out. They have no intention of fixing anything. They're just going to keep bouncing back-and-forth like they're doing something
So we cant even trust the Supreme court?
You are doing a great job. Keep going !
Military style weapons were in the 2 amendment as being provided by members drawn from the US population. I believe every weapon is allowed under the second amendment but understand that explosives might push it a little.
Military weapons!!!??? Like the colt 45?
Loke the Colt .45 Army and Navy revolvers, if they can get away with banning them.
🚀 ⛽ LIVE FREE
2A FOREVER ♾️
⛽🚀
Thank you Anthony
Live in Washington State and will always have these bans and violations of our rights.
Then you must know about HB 1504? It's a humdinger!
@@jt9462 until you drag them out of office and not allow them back in.
Nobody else but Democrats run and we are out voted over here in far eastern Washington
I am not an attorney but it seems to me the law suits should be directed at the state itself for denial of rights.. I think this endless bs must come with an end .maybe the state should be sanctioned in some way.. or charged with sedition as their job is to protect and defend the constitution and their actions are in direct defiance of their oath
Illinois, I moved from thete in 1999. to Alabama, a gun ftiendly state
Best decision ever😮.
Illinois citizen here!!! Still upset, violated and confused!!!
Heres the thing with this "military use test". When the Second Amendment was written and ratified in 1791, the only weapons a civillian could own WERE THE WEAPONS USED BY THE MILITARY! The military used flintlock muzzle loaders, and civillians were allowed to own flintlock muzzleloaders.
And cannons
Warships in the original navy were mostly private.
How dare you try to confuse the Left with facts, logic, reason and historical accuracy! 😂
And cannons, and ships of war.
It was a requirement that local municipalities maintain powder, flints, and shot stores for use not only by the militia, but the Continental Army also. Some larger towns even had cannons, powder, shell and shot. Civilians were required to have at least one military grade shoulder weapon per family. Imagine if today every family in America had at least one belt fed machine gun, or fully automatic rifle, or grenade launcher, etc. in keeping with the tradition of the original government. How far we have fallen...smh
Dont wait for permission its already granted within the constitution
Well, actually, inalienable rights are granted by God. The Constitution only defines or specifies what's already a natural human right availed to us by the almighty.
Ya, well he seems to be the only concerned with classifying the 2A as second class right. Being that they kicked the can down the road again on the Snopes case, which would have settled these cases.
Thanks for another clear video 👍👍👍
Anyone denying anyone else of ANY of their constitutional rights should be jailed.
See how they'd like it if their right to free speech was removed. I bet then they'd care.
Really Illinois does want these weapons on the street. Have they seen Chicago lately. If the law abiding citizens could defend themselves with there lawfully purchased guns could protect themselves with them. They do not know anything about military weapons.
Thanks for the updates
Thank You for All that you do.... 👍
I'm pretty done with the lawfare part of this. State pass restrictive laws. We danced up and down the courtroom steps for 10 years. The second amendment gets upheld. State passes the same law again but this time with an extra, or a couple of extra words in the whole process repeats. Meanwhile the statues allowed to be enforced while it's being litigated. This needs to work the other way until the laws upheld it should not be enforced
2A.
So they falow the normal Unruly of the courts on the 2nd rights of the people 🤔
So why have a judge if higher courts say hes wrong so no one should ever go to jail until all higher courts say its ok
Retiring this year, $82K biweekly, this video reminds me of my life in 2023, you have really inspired me in so many ways!!!!!💜
I'm feeling really motivated.
Could you share some details about the biweekly topic you brought up?
As a beginner, it is essential that you have a mentor to help you stay accountable. In my case, Elizabeth Marie Hawley has guided me for months and I highly recommend her. I focus on her. To be honest, I'm almost hesitant to let someone take charge of growing my finances, but I'm so glad I did.
You're correct!! I make a lot of money without relying on the government.
Investing in stocks, BTC, and XRP and digital currencies is beneficial at this moment.
I'm desperate to turn my finances around. I've been working three jobs just to pay off debt. Can someone please share contact or information? I need her help. A
Just be open-minded, and trust the process. Elizabeth Marie Hawley will guide you every step of the way. And don't forget to share your testimony with others when you see the results
2A!!!!! ✊
As a veteran I can say with 100% certainty that an AR-15 is not a military grade weapon. It’s similar to an M4/M16 but that’s about it
@@mikeriley8404 thank you for verifying my opinion.
7th circuit needs to shut up. McGlynn has it right! NO ONE RESTRICTS MY 2A. 7TH CIRCUIT IS DEFICIENT
Second amendment rights is right for battle ready arms.
Gas boycott 4/20 till 5/1 speak with dollars
There are no “military” grade weapons at issue. The only differences between AR style and other semi auto rifles are cosmetic…..rails, grips, etc.
Thank you
God bless you
In short 7th circuit is making the process take as long as possible. Until Supreme Court rules on this or other cases related nothing is going to happen.
thanks, Wes. It's not possible for me to understand most of what this prolific youtube presenter says.
Thanks Anthony
Born free, live free,die free! Shall not be infringed!!!
Thank you, again!!
Thank you.
Thank you
I am so sick of this bouncing back and forth between courts. It’s rediculous and it’s all happening because librards Don’t like any guns at all. That’s the only reason. I say screw all of them . Buy what you want
All this and the Supreme Court won't do shit this year to help us. Sucks to have to beg judges to restore something that should never have been taken.
So there is no new 9 to 0 SCOTUS decision?
I am from NC and got stationed in Northern New York met my wife and now I live here permanently. I am just wondering if there is any chance the Supreme Court can step in and force Hochul to restore our 2nd amendment rights. I mean this is absolutely insane. I can't even get a Marlin Model 60 22 without first getting a very intrusive pistol permit. I am completely beside myself because I am a collector and I can't really get very much at all. They also make you get a background check for antiques.
NY is not 2A friendly ,, at all
ASKING A CORPORATE EMPLOYEE PIG FOR PERMISSION, IS AN ACT OF TREASON!
I WILL NOT ASK A CORPORATE COP FFOR PERMISSION TO BUY/OWN/POSSESS A DAMN GUN!
THD COP CAN NOT LEGALLY CARRY EITHER, AS THEY ARE CORPORATE EMPLOYEES, DENIED ALL AUTHORITY AND RECOGNITION UNDER COMMON LAW...THEY HOLD ZERO JURISDICTION IN OUR REALM!
How about treason charges for the members of the 7th circuit court for openly violating their oath and authority
@@AECRADIO1 love this idea.
I don't have an M4 platform, previously known as the AR15; even though AR stands for Armalite. My semi-auto rifle is a 7.62x51 nato round firing semi-auto rifle. It's round is supersonic beyond 1100 yards, much like any bolt action .308 hunting rifle is. Is it an assault rifle? I do have 30 round mags for it, but I would never use it for home defense because the round would go through the perp, across the street, through that building, and traveling onward unless it contacted concrete walls I suppose. I favor my 12 gauge semi-auto shotgun that is loaded with 00 buckshot, containing roughly 12 pellets the size of nine mm rounds all moving at 1200 fps. It won't however, travel downrange like the above described rifle. That HK rifle is certainly a serious weapon, but it's not an automatic weapon like any military grade weapon usually is.
Watching acts play out after the bill released........what a bunch of garbage and no common sense.....
We still have more guns and people than them.
To quote a patriot: "is that level 4 plate?"
These circuit court judges need to face punishment for decisions they KNOW are unconstitutional but go against THEIR beliefs but not law,. Removal from the bench an disbarment at the least, if not prison time for the likes of the 7th circuit with its history of repeated offences. Without consequences they will just keep doing the same thing.
Thanks for the news
🇺🇸👍
2A
We need Trump to just issue a order to the courts to follow the Supreme Court or be jailed. Plain and simple.
It appears that SCOTUS denies cert if they believe they will see it again AFTER a review on merits. Which means they are simply saying "come back when due process has completed." I can't get worked up about them saying "in due time."
Ty
when the F are these Democratic Governor's going to listen the SC and the people of their state!!!!!
Just to refresh your memory, the AR - 15 ,
isn't an assault rifle.
No army on earth would use weapons like the AR - 15.
AR-15 is 1950s technology.
I like that district court judge. He has balls to stand up to the Marxists.
None of this matters untill we get a shall not be infringed ruling.
Not to worry. It's all about the Maryland case.
The second amendment was never meant to limit classes of weapons!
We must remain vigilant and advocate for the protection of our freedoms.
Maybe we should come for. A visit these guys are corrupt in this state ,protest
Great news!!
What a fuster cluck! Keep letting stated flagrantly ignore previous rulings and the Bill of Rights. Live free and ignore the tyrants. Our compliance is their strength.
Hello Al
⛽🚀
Let's Go!🎉😊❤
🇺🇸👍
Too bad Canada isn't nearly this interesting. Our supreme Court are a bunch of cowards.
Like the way you brake it down.
Stupid Supreme Court. Just get it done.
I had heard that there's a difference between what firearms are available to the general public and what the military is issued. Besides the militaries being issued firearms being able to fire single shots, fully automatic, and some can fire in three round bursts, while the firearms sold to the general public can't. Maybe there are some other differences.This would make the argument about firearms available to the general public, being military weapons moot.
"Military grade weapons"?? What does that even mean? Civilians can't own military weapons. What is this poppycock?
So does that mean a civilian can't use a K bar fighting knife???
Arms suitable for military use are exactly the type of firearms the 2A refers to.
The original navy was mostly private warships.
Istg if you don't start putting the state ahead of "Supreme Court".