Philippine civilian convoy sails toward disputed shoal in South China Sea
Вставка
- Опубліковано 15 тра 2024
- China and the Philippines have been embroiled in another heated standoff over competing claims in the South China Sea, after a Philippine convoy sailed towards the Scarborough Shoal. The group Atin Ito -- which means "this is ours" in Tagalog -- was on a mission to distribute provisions to Philippine fishermen, as well as to assert their rights in the disputed waterway. The effort was led by five commercial vessels, with about 200 volunteers, foreign observers and journalists on board. Beijing has accused Manila of "deliberately stirring up trouble", and demanded it to stop the "provocations".
Who the heck in Philippines side will understand those words from chinese radio..😅😅 china really likes to make a tv show..
Well then the Philippines should stay away if they dont understand the local language
@@ssss8162 china are the one entering Philippines territories. They are the one should adjust to speak Filipino language..
alien language😂😂😂@@ssss8162CCP PUPPET
pariah can't understand anything!
😑😑😑😑😑😑
China must respect the 2016 UNCLOS decisions.
Unsigned paper is like toilet paper.
Does the US respect UNCLOS decision?
@@jlm2962who told you? Winnie the pooh?😂
Toilet paper your ignorance.
only the pariah country got fooled by the ASS(Anglo SaxonS).
IT IS NOT DISPUTED. Its WEST PHILIPPINE SEA, PHILIPPINE TERRITORY.
Give historical proof?where?
@@PHC-vg1mu Youre a funny Chinese .
Aquino III renamed South China Sea to West Philippine Sea, then the sea belongs to the Philippines? If this logic is correct, if the Philippines rename the entire world's oceans to Philippines Ocean, the all the ocean in the world will belong to the Philippines? LOL!
@@user-fd3ld9qc7d Useless arguing with people who does not understand the logic. West Phil Sea within EEZ . D u m
@@user-fd3ld9qc7d Useless arguing with people who does not understand the logic. West Phil Sea within EEZ . D u m
May Allah bless you all. It was an honor taking part in this session with my teachers, Shaykh Abdullah and Shaykh Omar. May Allah accept from them, the Yaqeen team and all of us.
Inshallah as the world crisis progresses the smartest thing people do lately is building a strong investment that isn't controlled by the government. Like digital currencies.📌
That is very true, thanks brother for that kindly advice I was having a tough time until I started.
I started back in 2019 then I had to sell off some landed properties
No one's depends on salaries this days
That's really interesting! I've been thinking about investing in digital currencies lately but wondering how to do it, do anyone have any thought on that?♥️
To avoid losses as a and enhance profits as a newbie you'll need to consult a professional
It's more important than ever to support each other. Buying local helps all of us in Singapore thrive. Let’s do this together! 🌟
Supporting local is not just good for our economy, it’s good for our spirit. Let’s keep our local industries strong and vibrant!
Investing in local products means investing in Singapore. Let’s all lend our support and watch our community flourish.
What Law are talking about this Chinese Crew?
lawlessness 😅
The ownership of Scarborough Shoal is *not in dispute.*
According to UNCLOS laws, the Scarborough Shoal is a high-tide elevation within the 🇵🇭 Philippine's EEZ.
Therefore, it's part of the EEZ and belongs to the Philippines 🇵🇭.
More lies from the Sinophobic bot farm “Lastetc", "lastetc", "verylastetc", "nextlastetc" bot.
China and Taiwan owns SCS before unclos even existed. They do not need unclos law to own their scs.
Your comment is irrelevant.
@@LeeSkJohn-sv8wi Then why did China signed up for UNCLOS?
@@LeeSkJohn-sv8wi you don't own anything there thief
@@ToiChutGongWu Wow more spam 😂
kayo chikwa lomayas kayo dyan. Sa WPS..
Having read most of the comments here, I found a lot of Filipino trolls, if not bots. They are very uneducated, if not malicious as being selective about international laws; cherry-picking parts of laws that favor them while ignoring laws that puts them at the disadvantage. Laws cannot be accepted and applied partially. They are either accepted and applied in its entirety, or not at all. The 2 main arguments that they use are the 1980 UNCLOS, and the close proximity between the disputed islets and the Philippines. Both of these arguments can be refuted easily.
UNCLOS came into effect in 1980, but made it very clear that sovereign claims and ownership made prior to its establishment in 1980 are not nullified by it. China made her sovereignty claims to the South China Sea islets and reefs way back in 1947, while the Philippines' claims were made in the 1960s and 70s. Sovereign ownership according to international norms comes at a first come first serve basis. If the Philippines wants to make its claims to the SCS islets and reefs more legitimate than China's then it should have made those claims earlier than the Chinese did in 1947, and not use the UNCLOS as an poor excuse to nullify China's claims since UNCLOS cannot be used to nullified prior claims by its own definition. Otherwise, there is another solution for the Philippines: fight a war with China and defeat China in order to force China into signing a treaty in which China gives up sovereign claims to the disputed SCS islets and reefs and recognizes the islets and reefs' sovereignty belongs to the Philippines instead. If you Filipinos can achieve that, then do it, otherwise stop barking around.
Regarding the arguments based on proximity, why don't you Filipinos claim sovereign over Guam? Guam is closer to the Philippines than it is to the mainland USA or even outlying Hawaii. Is it becuase you Filipinos only dare to agitate China but not your de-facto masters in the USA? LOL! India's Andaman and Nicobar islands are closer to Myanmar and Indonesia respectively than they are closer to India, so does not mean Andaman and Nicobar do not belong to India? Some of Singapore's sovereign islands and reefs are closer to Malaysia or Indonesia than main island Singapore, so does that mean they do not belong to Singapore? If that logic is correct, that perhaps certain outlying Filipino islands, being further away from Luzon or Mindanao but closer to Borneo are not Philippines but are in fact Malaysia's, Indonesia's or Brunei's. LMFAO!
And please stop invoking the 2016 SCS verdict. That was a political farce orchestrated by Aquino III govt and its de-facto masters in Washington DC, aiming at de-legitimizing China's historical claims to the SCS islands and reefs made all the way back in 1947. It is a farce because the court that issued the verdict was setup by the US-led Western alliance and not the legitimate international court that is the UNICJ. They only used the same venue/courtroom as the UNICJ, but it is not the same court. It is a kin to the unequal treaties that the Western powers forced China into signing in the 19th century. Difference is China back then cannot defend herself, but the modern China can. Truth be told, that farce of a show they call an international legal verdict is useless. The more useful way to nullify China's 1947 sovereign claims to the SCS islands and reefs is again, fight and defeat China in a war to force China into giving up her 1947 claims. But you Filipinos are unable to do that. Not only you, but your de-facto American master cannot either as even the USA is unsure of defeating China in an all-out military conflict today.
And the most ridiculous argument is that the SCS islands and reefs are the Philippines because Aquino III renamed the SCS as the West Philippines Sea. LOL!!! Then why don't you rename all of the world's ocean as the Philippines Oceans, then all the world's oceans will belong to the Philippines!? LMFAO!!!
Anyway, why is the Philippines agitating China on the SCS islands and reefs dispute now out of all other times? Perhaps because Marcos Jr. is a weak leader and in order to maintain his position in power, has to willingly turn himself into an American poodle, and the USA, being in competition with China on many matters, would logically be using Marcos Jr.'s Philippines to put pressure on China in the SCS, although such pressure is comparative small. This is unlike the Philippines during Duterte's presidency when he came a distance away from the Americans and not agitating China on the SCS islands and reefs dispute issue. But that's OK for China though, because regardless of who's in charge in the Philippines, it doesn't have the capability to challenge China. So here is my suggestion to the Philippines if you Filipinos wants to expand your territories: Why don't you ask the USA to cede some of their Pacific islands to you? You have a good relationship with the USA. I am sure the Americans would be glad to give some of their Pacific islands over to you. You and the Americans are friends, right? So go ahead and ask USA to give you those Pacific American islands instead of agitating China in the SCS. LOL!!!
Next Philippines civilian mission will be in Hainan island
Is that another fictitious name for an island that is 600km away from Beijing?? 😂😂😂😂
The world knows that China claim has no basis and not recognized by the International community.
Having read most of the comments here, I found a lot of Filipino trolls, if not bots. They are very uneducated, if not malicious as being selective about international laws; cherry-picking parts of laws that favor them while ignoring laws that puts them at the disadvantage. Laws cannot be accepted and applied partially. They are either accepted and applied in its entirety, or not at all. The 2 main arguments that they use are the 1980 UNCLOS, and the close proximity between the disputed islets and the Philippines. Both of these arguments can be refuted easily.
UNCLOS came into effect in 1980, but made it very clear that sovereign claims and ownership made prior to its establishment in 1980 are not nullified by it. China made her sovereignty claims to the South China Sea islets and reefs way back in 1947, while the Philippines' claims were made in the 1960s and 70s. Sovereign ownership according to international norms comes at a first come first serve basis. If the Philippines wants to make its claims to the SCS islets and reefs more legitimate than China's then it should have made those claims earlier than the Chinese did in 1947, and not use the UNCLOS as an poor excuse to nullify China's claims since UNCLOS cannot be used to nullified prior claims by its own definition. Otherwise, there is another solution for the Philippines: fight a war with China and defeat China in order to force China into signing a treaty in which China gives up sovereign claims to the disputed SCS islets and reefs and recognizes the islets and reefs' sovereignty belongs to the Philippines instead. If you Filipinos can achieve that, then do it, otherwise stop barking around.
Regarding the arguments based on proximity, why don't you Filipinos claim sovereign over Guam? Guam is closer to the Philippines than it is to the mainland USA or even outlying Hawaii. Is it becuase you Filipinos only dare to agitate China but not your de-facto masters in the USA? LOL! India's Andaman and Nicobar islands are closer to Myanmar and Indonesia respectively than they are closer to India, so does not mean Andaman and Nicobar do not belong to India? Some of Singapore's sovereign islands and reefs are closer to Malaysia or Indonesia than main island Singapore, so does that mean they do not belong to Singapore? If that logic is correct, that perhaps certain outlying Filipino islands, being further away from Luzon or Mindanao but closer to Borneo are not Philippines but are in fact Malaysia's, Indonesia's or Brunei's. LMFAO!
And please stop invoking the 2016 SCS verdict. That was a political farce orchestrated by Aquino III govt and its de-facto masters in Washington DC, aiming at de-legitimizing China's historical claims to the SCS islands and reefs made all the way back in 1947. It is a farce because the court that issued the verdict was setup by the US-led Western alliance and not the legitimate international court that is the UNICJ. They only used the same venue/courtroom as the UNICJ, but it is not the same court. It is a kin to the unequal treaties that the Western powers forced China into signing in the 19th century. Difference is China back then cannot defend herself, but the modern China can. Truth be told, that farce of a show they call an international legal verdict is useless. The more useful way to nullify China's 1947 sovereign claims to the SCS islands and reefs is again, fight and defeat China in a war to force China into giving up her 1947 claims. But you Filipinos are unable to do that. Not only you, but your de-facto American master cannot either as even the USA is unsure of defeating China in an all-out military conflict today.
And the most ridiculous argument is that the SCS islands and reefs are the Philippines because Aquino III renamed the SCS as the West Philippines Sea. LOL!!! Then why don't you rename all of the world's ocean as the Philippines Oceans, then all the world's oceans will belong to the Philippines!? LMFAO!!!
Anyway, why is the Philippines agitating China on the SCS islands and reefs dispute now out of all other times? Perhaps because Marcos Jr. is a weak leader and in order to maintain his position in power, has to willingly turn himself into an American poodle, and the USA, being in competition with China on many matters, would logically be using Marcos Jr.'s Philippines to put pressure on China in the SCS, although such pressure is comparative small. This is unlike the Philippines during Duterte's presidency when he came a distance away from the Americans and not agitating China on the SCS islands and reefs dispute issue. But that's OK for China though, because regardless of who's in charge in the Philippines, it doesn't have the capability to challenge China. So here is my suggestion to the Philippines if you Filipinos wants to expand your territories: Why don't you ask the USA to cede some of their Pacific islands to you? You have a good relationship with the USA. I am sure the Americans would be glad to give some of their Pacific islands over to you. You and the Americans are friends, right? So go ahead and ask USA to give you those Pacific American islands instead of agitating China in the SCS. LOL!!!
*China🇨🇳 in south China sea have maritime disputes with Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei, Taiwan.🎉*
make maritime agreement & peace!
Pooh craaaaaazy mad 🤡🤡🤡
CNA- CHINA NEWS AGENCY
Its inside the PHILIPPINES TERITORY WITH ONLY 75kilometer vs china 2000kilometer🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🤬🤬🤬💩💩💩😈😈😈
Yeah a BIAS MEDIA.
You build your home country rite beside China's waters. lol that who's nearer bs don't apply
*The international law* is very clear on the South China Sea:
- parts of it belong to some ASEAN countries including the Philippines 🇵🇭,
- the rest of it is the international water,
- no part of it belongs to China🇨🇳 or Taiwan🇹🇼.
if it's not belong to China, why does it call Sourth China See?
Your mouth is the international law make no sense approach it.
Parts belong to india
Unsigned paper is like toilet paper
This spam is usually posted by the Sinophobic bot farm “Lastetc", "lastetc", "verylastetc", "nextlastetc" bot.
Why is that Chinese Navy guy spoke in Mandarin to the Filipinos ? Is this a clip for the Chinese back in their country?😅
Because it’s china territory,of course speaking Chinese
CCP need to distract their people with propagandas.
@@DongYao-eb4kqyou must talk in intermediate language when talking to another nation the Chinese don't know that
@@DongYao-eb4kqaustronesians navigated the sea first before chinese.
Free West Philippine Sea!!
There isn't west Philippines sea on the world map
Having read most of the comments here, I found a lot of Filipino trolls, if not bots. They are very uneducated, if not malicious as being selective about international laws; cherry-picking parts of laws that favor them while ignoring laws that puts them at the disadvantage. Laws cannot be accepted and applied partially. They are either accepted and applied in its entirety, or not at all. The 2 main arguments that they use are the 1980 UNCLOS, and the close proximity between the disputed islets and the Philippines. Both of these arguments can be refuted easily.
UNCLOS came into effect in 1980, but made it very clear that sovereign claims and ownership made prior to its establishment in 1980 are not nullified by it. China made her sovereignty claims to the South China Sea islets and reefs way back in 1947, while the Philippines' claims were made in the 1960s and 70s. Sovereign ownership according to international norms comes at a first come first serve basis. If the Philippines wants to make its claims to the SCS islets and reefs more legitimate than China's then it should have made those claims earlier than the Chinese did in 1947, and not use the UNCLOS as an poor excuse to nullify China's claims since UNCLOS cannot be used to nullified prior claims by its own definition. Otherwise, there is another solution for the Philippines: fight a war with China and defeat China in order to force China into signing a treaty in which China gives up sovereign claims to the disputed SCS islets and reefs and recognizes the islets and reefs' sovereignty belongs to the Philippines instead. If you Filipinos can achieve that, then do it, otherwise stop barking around.
Regarding the arguments based on proximity, why don't you Filipinos claim sovereign over Guam? Guam is closer to the Philippines than it is to the mainland USA or even outlying Hawaii. Is it becuase you Filipinos only dare to agitate China but not your de-facto masters in the USA? LOL! India's Andaman and Nicobar islands are closer to Myanmar and Indonesia respectively than they are closer to India, so does not mean Andaman and Nicobar do not belong to India? Some of Singapore's sovereign islands and reefs are closer to Malaysia or Indonesia than main island Singapore, so does that mean they do not belong to Singapore? If that logic is correct, that perhaps certain outlying Filipino islands, being further away from Luzon or Mindanao but closer to Borneo are not Philippines but are in fact Malaysia's, Indonesia's or Brunei's. LMFAO!
And please stop invoking the 2016 SCS verdict. That was a political farce orchestrated by Aquino III govt and its de-facto masters in Washington DC, aiming at de-legitimizing China's historical claims to the SCS islands and reefs made all the way back in 1947. It is a farce because the court that issued the verdict was setup by the US-led Western alliance and not the legitimate international court that is the UNICJ. They only used the same venue/courtroom as the UNICJ, but it is not the same court. It is a kin to the unequal treaties that the Western powers forced China into signing in the 19th century. Difference is China back then cannot defend herself, but the modern China can. Truth be told, that farce of a show they call an international legal verdict is useless. The more useful way to nullify China's 1947 sovereign claims to the SCS islands and reefs is again, fight and defeat China in a war to force China into giving up her 1947 claims. But you Filipinos are unable to do that. Not only you, but your de-facto American master cannot either as even the USA is unsure of defeating China in an all-out military conflict today.
And the most ridiculous argument is that the SCS islands and reefs are the Philippines because Aquino III renamed the SCS as the West Philippines Sea. LOL!!! Then why don't you rename all of the world's ocean as the Philippines Oceans, then all the world's oceans will belong to the Philippines!? LMFAO!!!
Anyway, why is the Philippines agitating China on the SCS islands and reefs dispute now out of all other times? Perhaps because Marcos Jr. is a weak leader and in order to maintain his position in power, has to willingly turn himself into an American poodle, and the USA, being in competition with China on many matters, would logically be using Marcos Jr.'s Philippines to put pressure on China in the SCS, although such pressure is comparative small. This is unlike the Philippines during Duterte's presidency when he came a distance away from the Americans and not agitating China on the SCS islands and reefs dispute issue. But that's OK for China though, because regardless of who's in charge in the Philippines, it doesn't have the capability to challenge China. So here is my suggestion to the Philippines if you Filipinos wants to expand your territories: Why don't you ask the USA to cede some of their Pacific islands to you? You have a good relationship with the USA. I am sure the Americans would be glad to give some of their Pacific islands over to you. You and the Americans are friends, right? So go ahead and ask USA to give you those Pacific American islands instead of agitating China in the SCS. LOL!!!
If you give China one square inch, it will take the whole West Philippines 🇵🇭 Sea. LOL
SB
@@user-vw4cu6ne9u WUMAO Hahaha
😂😂😂
Hahaha, west Philippines sea? Give me a break. Name me any other ASEAN country call that! You can call anything you like but if even your neighbours don't use it, you are just a clown. 😂
@@louis8743
Proud of my Wumao ✌️✌️👍
@@loneranger114 Hahaha Wumao you should be proud of your Shameless Country China, is your credit score high? How can you use UA-cam in China to spread lies? 😂😂😂
But these are under ph eez. Whats wrong with this.
Having read most of the comments here, I found a lot of Filipino trolls, if not bots. They are very uneducated, if not malicious as being selective about international laws; cherry-picking parts of laws that favor them while ignoring laws that puts them at the disadvantage. Laws cannot be accepted and applied partially. They are either accepted and applied in its entirety, or not at all. The 2 main arguments that they use are the 1980 UNCLOS, and the close proximity between the disputed islets and the Philippines. Both of these arguments can be refuted easily.
UNCLOS came into effect in 1980, but made it very clear that sovereign claims and ownership made prior to its establishment in 1980 are not nullified by it. China made her sovereignty claims to the South China Sea islets and reefs way back in 1947, while the Philippines' claims were made in the 1960s and 70s. Sovereign ownership according to international norms comes at a first come first serve basis. If the Philippines wants to make its claims to the SCS islets and reefs more legitimate than China's then it should have made those claims earlier than the Chinese did in 1947, and not use the UNCLOS as an poor excuse to nullify China's claims since UNCLOS cannot be used to nullified prior claims by its own definition. Otherwise, there is another solution for the Philippines: fight a war with China and defeat China in order to force China into signing a treaty in which China gives up sovereign claims to the disputed SCS islets and reefs and recognizes the islets and reefs' sovereignty belongs to the Philippines instead. If you Filipinos can achieve that, then do it, otherwise stop barking around.
Regarding the arguments based on proximity, why don't you Filipinos claim sovereign over Guam? Guam is closer to the Philippines than it is to the mainland USA or even outlying Hawaii. Is it becuase you Filipinos only dare to agitate China but not your de-facto masters in the USA? LOL! India's Andaman and Nicobar islands are closer to Myanmar and Indonesia respectively than they are closer to India, so does not mean Andaman and Nicobar do not belong to India? Some of Singapore's sovereign islands and reefs are closer to Malaysia or Indonesia than main island Singapore, so does that mean they do not belong to Singapore? If that logic is correct, that perhaps certain outlying Filipino islands, being further away from Luzon or Mindanao but closer to Borneo are not Philippines but are in fact Malaysia's, Indonesia's or Brunei's. LMFAO!
And please stop invoking the 2016 SCS verdict. That was a political farce orchestrated by Aquino III govt and its de-facto masters in Washington DC, aiming at de-legitimizing China's historical claims to the SCS islands and reefs made all the way back in 1947. It is a farce because the court that issued the verdict was setup by the US-led Western alliance and not the legitimate international court that is the UNICJ. They only used the same venue/courtroom as the UNICJ, but it is not the same court. It is a kin to the unequal treaties that the Western powers forced China into signing in the 19th century. Difference is China back then cannot defend herself, but the modern China can. Truth be told, that farce of a show they call an international legal verdict is useless. The more useful way to nullify China's 1947 sovereign claims to the SCS islands and reefs is again, fight and defeat China in a war to force China into giving up her 1947 claims. But you Filipinos are unable to do that. Not only you, but your de-facto American master cannot either as even the USA is unsure of defeating China in an all-out military conflict today.
And the most ridiculous argument is that the SCS islands and reefs are the Philippines because Aquino III renamed the SCS as the West Philippines Sea. LOL!!! Then why don't you rename all of the world's ocean as the Philippines Oceans, then all the world's oceans will belong to the Philippines!? LMFAO!!!
Anyway, why is the Philippines agitating China on the SCS islands and reefs dispute now out of all other times? Perhaps because Marcos Jr. is a weak leader and in order to maintain his position in power, has to willingly turn himself into an American poodle, and the USA, being in competition with China on many matters, would logically be using Marcos Jr.'s Philippines to put pressure on China in the SCS, although such pressure is comparative small. This is unlike the Philippines during Duterte's presidency when he came a distance away from the Americans and not agitating China on the SCS islands and reefs dispute issue. But that's OK for China though, because regardless of who's in charge in the Philippines, it doesn't have the capability to challenge China. So here is my suggestion to the Philippines if you Filipinos wants to expand your territories: Why don't you ask the USA to cede some of their Pacific islands to you? You have a good relationship with the USA. I am sure the Americans would be glad to give some of their Pacific islands over to you. You and the Americans are friends, right? So go ahead and ask USA to give you those Pacific American islands instead of agitating China in the SCS. LOL!!!
Its not disputed. Its well within Philippines EEZ. Only barbarians dont respect international law.
You build your home country rite beside China's waters. lol
@@Qingqiu9 are you on drugs or something else?
@@Qingqiu9China's water??? HELLO!!! WAKE UP!!! That's a few nautical miles from the Philippines.
@@Qingqiu9what's next? the east side of the Philippines? You will claim that too. omg!!! How greedy you are!!! claim also the moon and the universe, put your flag in there, and make a statement based on your baseless historical lies.😂😂😂
Sovereignty is not determined by distance. If thats the case den if i park my car next to your house, den my car belongs to you?
Stop calling them as south china because it is within the south philippine sea
More action pls. No more talks.
It is name SOUTH CHINA SEA because philippines does not even a exist as a country when SOUTH CHINA SEA was being name. And please act on it. don't keep trowing bs because you will not be getting any support from Asian countries.
Having read most of the comments here, I found a lot of Filipino trolls, if not bots. They are very uneducated, if not malicious as being selective about international laws; cherry-picking parts of laws that favor them while ignoring laws that puts them at the disadvantage. Laws cannot be accepted and applied partially. They are either accepted and applied in its entirety, or not at all. The 2 main arguments that they use are the 1980 UNCLOS, and the close proximity between the disputed islets and the Philippines. Both of these arguments can be refuted easily.
UNCLOS came into effect in 1980, but made it very clear that sovereign claims and ownership made prior to its establishment in 1980 are not nullified by it. China made her sovereignty claims to the South China Sea islets and reefs way back in 1947, while the Philippines' claims were made in the 1960s and 70s. Sovereign ownership according to international norms comes at a first come first serve basis. If the Philippines wants to make its claims to the SCS islets and reefs more legitimate than China's then it should have made those claims earlier than the Chinese did in 1947, and not use the UNCLOS as an poor excuse to nullify China's claims since UNCLOS cannot be used to nullified prior claims by its own definition. Otherwise, there is another solution for the Philippines: fight a war with China and defeat China in order to force China into signing a treaty in which China gives up sovereign claims to the disputed SCS islets and reefs and recognizes the islets and reefs' sovereignty belongs to the Philippines instead. If you Filipinos can achieve that, then do it, otherwise stop barking around.
Regarding the arguments based on proximity, why don't you Filipinos claim sovereign over Guam? Guam is closer to the Philippines than it is to the mainland USA or even outlying Hawaii. Is it becuase you Filipinos only dare to agitate China but not your de-facto masters in the USA? LOL! India's Andaman and Nicobar islands are closer to Myanmar and Indonesia respectively than they are closer to India, so does not mean Andaman and Nicobar do not belong to India? Some of Singapore's sovereign islands and reefs are closer to Malaysia or Indonesia than main island Singapore, so does that mean they do not belong to Singapore? If that logic is correct, that perhaps certain outlying Filipino islands, being further away from Luzon or Mindanao but closer to Borneo are not Philippines but are in fact Malaysia's, Indonesia's or Brunei's. LMFAO!
And please stop invoking the 2016 SCS verdict. That was a political farce orchestrated by Aquino III govt and its de-facto masters in Washington DC, aiming at de-legitimizing China's historical claims to the SCS islands and reefs made all the way back in 1947. It is a farce because the court that issued the verdict was setup by the US-led Western alliance and not the legitimate international court that is the UNICJ. They only used the same venue/courtroom as the UNICJ, but it is not the same court. It is a kin to the unequal treaties that the Western powers forced China into signing in the 19th century. Difference is China back then cannot defend herself, but the modern China can. Truth be told, that farce of a show they call an international legal verdict is useless. The more useful way to nullify China's 1947 sovereign claims to the SCS islands and reefs is again, fight and defeat China in a war to force China into giving up her 1947 claims. But you Filipinos are unable to do that. Not only you, but your de-facto American master cannot either as even the USA is unsure of defeating China in an all-out military conflict today.
And the most ridiculous argument is that the SCS islands and reefs are the Philippines because Aquino III renamed the SCS as the West Philippines Sea. LOL!!! Then why don't you rename all of the world's ocean as the Philippines Oceans, then all the world's oceans will belong to the Philippines!? LMFAO!!!
Anyway, why is the Philippines agitating China on the SCS islands and reefs dispute now out of all other times? Perhaps because Marcos Jr. is a weak leader and in order to maintain his position in power, has to willingly turn himself into an American poodle, and the USA, being in competition with China on many matters, would logically be using Marcos Jr.'s Philippines to put pressure on China in the SCS, although such pressure is comparative small. This is unlike the Philippines during Duterte's presidency when he came a distance away from the Americans and not agitating China on the SCS islands and reefs dispute issue. But that's OK for China though, because regardless of who's in charge in the Philippines, it doesn't have the capability to challenge China. So here is my suggestion to the Philippines if you Filipinos wants to expand your territories: Why don't you ask the USA to cede some of their Pacific islands to you? You have a good relationship with the USA. I am sure the Americans would be glad to give some of their Pacific islands over to you. You and the Americans are friends, right? So go ahead and ask USA to give you those Pacific American islands instead of agitating China in the SCS. LOL!!!
it's the south china sea because they just rinsed your flag in front of your face. 😛😛😛
@@Qingqiu9In ancient times, there was no government in china, only warring dynasties with chinese warlords. So what makes china special? Genghis Khan even ruled china. So it means china is part of mongolia.
Truth is within the range of cannonballs
The Philippines demands Chinese vessels to leave its EEZ, uphold UNCLOS ruling, and stop provocations.
Excuse me china that is philippines..that is part phippines exclusive economic zone of the philippines..try filipino in time of war..sure heart of general filipino will figth you..
Don't lie, filipino cant fight.
Having read most of the comments here, I found a lot of Filipino trolls, if not bots. They are very uneducated, if not malicious as being selective about international laws; cherry-picking parts of laws that favor them while ignoring laws that puts them at the disadvantage. Laws cannot be accepted and applied partially. They are either accepted and applied in its entirety, or not at all. The 2 main arguments that they use are the 1980 UNCLOS, and the close proximity between the disputed islets and the Philippines. Both of these arguments can be refuted easily.
UNCLOS came into effect in 1980, but made it very clear that sovereign claims and ownership made prior to its establishment in 1980 are not nullified by it. China made her sovereignty claims to the South China Sea islets and reefs way back in 1947, while the Philippines' claims were made in the 1960s and 70s. Sovereign ownership according to international norms comes at a first come first serve basis. If the Philippines wants to make its claims to the SCS islets and reefs more legitimate than China's then it should have made those claims earlier than the Chinese did in 1947, and not use the UNCLOS as an poor excuse to nullify China's claims since UNCLOS cannot be used to nullified prior claims by its own definition. Otherwise, there is another solution for the Philippines: fight a war with China and defeat China in order to force China into signing a treaty in which China gives up sovereign claims to the disputed SCS islets and reefs and recognizes the islets and reefs' sovereignty belongs to the Philippines instead. If you Filipinos can achieve that, then do it, otherwise stop barking around.
Regarding the arguments based on proximity, why don't you Filipinos claim sovereign over Guam? Guam is closer to the Philippines than it is to the mainland USA or even outlying Hawaii. Is it becuase you Filipinos only dare to agitate China but not your de-facto masters in the USA? LOL! India's Andaman and Nicobar islands are closer to Myanmar and Indonesia respectively than they are closer to India, so does not mean Andaman and Nicobar do not belong to India? Some of Singapore's sovereign islands and reefs are closer to Malaysia or Indonesia than main island Singapore, so does that mean they do not belong to Singapore? If that logic is correct, that perhaps certain outlying Filipino islands, being further away from Luzon or Mindanao but closer to Borneo are not Philippines but are in fact Malaysia's, Indonesia's or Brunei's. LMFAO!
And please stop invoking the 2016 SCS verdict. That was a political farce orchestrated by Aquino III govt and its de-facto masters in Washington DC, aiming at de-legitimizing China's historical claims to the SCS islands and reefs made all the way back in 1947. It is a farce because the court that issued the verdict was setup by the US-led Western alliance and not the legitimate international court that is the UNICJ. They only used the same venue/courtroom as the UNICJ, but it is not the same court. It is a kin to the unequal treaties that the Western powers forced China into signing in the 19th century. Difference is China back then cannot defend herself, but the modern China can. Truth be told, that farce of a show they call an international legal verdict is useless. The more useful way to nullify China's 1947 sovereign claims to the SCS islands and reefs is again, fight and defeat China in a war to force China into giving up her 1947 claims. But you Filipinos are unable to do that. Not only you, but your de-facto American master cannot either as even the USA is unsure of defeating China in an all-out military conflict today.
And the most ridiculous argument is that the SCS islands and reefs are the Philippines because Aquino III renamed the SCS as the West Philippines Sea. LOL!!! Then why don't you rename all of the world's ocean as the Philippines Oceans, then all the world's oceans will belong to the Philippines!? LMFAO!!!
Anyway, why is the Philippines agitating China on the SCS islands and reefs dispute now out of all other times? Perhaps because Marcos Jr. is a weak leader and in order to maintain his position in power, has to willingly turn himself into an American poodle, and the USA, being in competition with China on many matters, would logically be using Marcos Jr.'s Philippines to put pressure on China in the SCS, although such pressure is comparative small. This is unlike the Philippines during Duterte's presidency when he came a distance away from the Americans and not agitating China on the SCS islands and reefs dispute issue. But that's OK for China though, because regardless of who's in charge in the Philippines, it doesn't have the capability to challenge China. So here is my suggestion to the Philippines if you Filipinos wants to expand your territories: Why don't you ask the USA to cede some of their Pacific islands to you? You have a good relationship with the USA. I am sure the Americans would be glad to give some of their Pacific islands over to you. You and the Americans are friends, right? So go ahead and ask USA to give you those Pacific American islands instead of agitating China in the SCS. LOL!!!
you just allowed them to rinse your flag in front of your face, tough guy. 😛😛😛
Philippine people declared victory 60 miles away from the island. what victory ?
It's west Philippine sea. It's Philippines exclusive economic zone so It's ours 🇵🇭
Having read most of the comments here, I found a lot of Filipino trolls, if not bots. They are very uneducated, if not malicious as being selective about international laws; cherry-picking parts of laws that favor them while ignoring laws that puts them at the disadvantage. Laws cannot be accepted and applied partially. They are either accepted and applied in its entirety, or not at all. The 2 main arguments that they use are the 1980 UNCLOS, and the close proximity between the disputed islets and the Philippines. Both of these arguments can be refuted easily.
UNCLOS came into effect in 1980, but made it very clear that sovereign claims and ownership made prior to its establishment in 1980 are not nullified by it. China made her sovereignty claims to the South China Sea islets and reefs way back in 1947, while the Philippines' claims were made in the 1960s and 70s. Sovereign ownership according to international norms comes at a first come first serve basis. If the Philippines wants to make its claims to the SCS islets and reefs more legitimate than China's then it should have made those claims earlier than the Chinese did in 1947, and not use the UNCLOS as an poor excuse to nullify China's claims since UNCLOS cannot be used to nullified prior claims by its own definition. Otherwise, there is another solution for the Philippines: fight a war with China and defeat China in order to force China into signing a treaty in which China gives up sovereign claims to the disputed SCS islets and reefs and recognizes the islets and reefs' sovereignty belongs to the Philippines instead. If you Filipinos can achieve that, then do it, otherwise stop barking around.
Regarding the arguments based on proximity, why don't you Filipinos claim sovereign over Guam? Guam is closer to the Philippines than it is to the mainland USA or even outlying Hawaii. Is it becuase you Filipinos only dare to agitate China but not your de-facto masters in the USA? LOL! India's Andaman and Nicobar islands are closer to Myanmar and Indonesia respectively than they are closer to India, so does not mean Andaman and Nicobar do not belong to India? Some of Singapore's sovereign islands and reefs are closer to Malaysia or Indonesia than main island Singapore, so does that mean they do not belong to Singapore? If that logic is correct, that perhaps certain outlying Filipino islands, being further away from Luzon or Mindanao but closer to Borneo are not Philippines but are in fact Malaysia's, Indonesia's or Brunei's. LMFAO!
And please stop invoking the 2016 SCS verdict. That was a political farce orchestrated by Aquino III govt and its de-facto masters in Washington DC, aiming at de-legitimizing China's historical claims to the SCS islands and reefs made all the way back in 1947. It is a farce because the court that issued the verdict was setup by the US-led Western alliance and not the legitimate international court that is the UNICJ. They only used the same venue/courtroom as the UNICJ, but it is not the same court. It is a kin to the unequal treaties that the Western powers forced China into signing in the 19th century. Difference is China back then cannot defend herself, but the modern China can. Truth be told, that farce of a show they call an international legal verdict is useless. The more useful way to nullify China's 1947 sovereign claims to the SCS islands and reefs is again, fight and defeat China in a war to force China into giving up her 1947 claims. But you Filipinos are unable to do that. Not only you, but your de-facto American master cannot either as even the USA is unsure of defeating China in an all-out military conflict today.
And the most ridiculous argument is that the SCS islands and reefs are the Philippines because Aquino III renamed the SCS as the West Philippines Sea. LOL!!! Then why don't you rename all of the world's ocean as the Philippines Oceans, then all the world's oceans will belong to the Philippines!? LMFAO!!!
Anyway, why is the Philippines agitating China on the SCS islands and reefs dispute now out of all other times? Perhaps because Marcos Jr. is a weak leader and in order to maintain his position in power, has to willingly turn himself into an American poodle, and the USA, being in competition with China on many matters, would logically be using Marcos Jr.'s Philippines to put pressure on China in the SCS, although such pressure is comparative small. This is unlike the Philippines during Duterte's presidency when he came a distance away from the Americans and not agitating China on the SCS islands and reefs dispute issue. But that's OK for China though, because regardless of who's in charge in the Philippines, it doesn't have the capability to challenge China. So here is my suggestion to the Philippines if you Filipinos wants to expand your territories: Why don't you ask the USA to cede some of their Pacific islands to you? You have a good relationship with the USA. I am sure the Americans would be glad to give some of their Pacific islands over to you. You and the Americans are friends, right? So go ahead and ask USA to give you those Pacific American islands instead of agitating China in the SCS. LOL!!!
China is crying 😭
一個附庸國 小螞蟻 能挑戰大象嗎? ㄎㄎ 可笑
Yes the spokesperson seems like he is about to cry😂😂😂!
@@kingcemll8025Haha. Last time we had a war, guess who lost? 40000 Chinese vs 900 Filipinos. Dont forget Korea where you ran away like 🐓🐓🐓
Philippine's soldiers hide behind the fisher，shame on you😂😂😂😂
@@kingcemll8025yet can't trample it?
👍🇵🇭
🥾🇨🇳
pariah!
Having read most of the comments here, I found a lot of Filipino trolls, if not bots. They are very uneducated, if not malicious as being selective about international laws; cherry-picking parts of laws that favor them while ignoring laws that puts them at the disadvantage. Laws cannot be accepted and applied partially. They are either accepted and applied in its entirety, or not at all. The 2 main arguments that they use are the 1980 UNCLOS, and the close proximity between the disputed islets and the Philippines. Both of these arguments can be refuted easily.
UNCLOS came into effect in 1980, but made it very clear that sovereign claims and ownership made prior to its establishment in 1980 are not nullified by it. China made her sovereignty claims to the South China Sea islets and reefs way back in 1947, while the Philippines' claims were made in the 1960s and 70s. Sovereign ownership according to international norms comes at a first come first serve basis. If the Philippines wants to make its claims to the SCS islets and reefs more legitimate than China's then it should have made those claims earlier than the Chinese did in 1947, and not use the UNCLOS as an poor excuse to nullify China's claims since UNCLOS cannot be used to nullified prior claims by its own definition. Otherwise, there is another solution for the Philippines: fight a war with China and defeat China in order to force China into signing a treaty in which China gives up sovereign claims to the disputed SCS islets and reefs and recognizes the islets and reefs' sovereignty belongs to the Philippines instead. If you Filipinos can achieve that, then do it, otherwise stop barking around.
Regarding the arguments based on proximity, why don't you Filipinos claim sovereign over Guam? Guam is closer to the Philippines than it is to the mainland USA or even outlying Hawaii. Is it becuase you Filipinos only dare to agitate China but not your de-facto masters in the USA? LOL! India's Andaman and Nicobar islands are closer to Myanmar and Indonesia respectively than they are closer to India, so does not mean Andaman and Nicobar do not belong to India? Some of Singapore's sovereign islands and reefs are closer to Malaysia or Indonesia than main island Singapore, so does that mean they do not belong to Singapore? If that logic is correct, that perhaps certain outlying Filipino islands, being further away from Luzon or Mindanao but closer to Borneo are not Philippines but are in fact Malaysia's, Indonesia's or Brunei's. LMFAO!
And please stop invoking the 2016 SCS verdict. That was a political farce orchestrated by Aquino III govt and its de-facto masters in Washington DC, aiming at de-legitimizing China's historical claims to the SCS islands and reefs made all the way back in 1947. It is a farce because the court that issued the verdict was setup by the US-led Western alliance and not the legitimate international court that is the UNICJ. They only used the same venue/courtroom as the UNICJ, but it is not the same court. It is a kin to the unequal treaties that the Western powers forced China into signing in the 19th century. Difference is China back then cannot defend herself, but the modern China can. Truth be told, that farce of a show they call an international legal verdict is useless. The more useful way to nullify China's 1947 sovereign claims to the SCS islands and reefs is again, fight and defeat China in a war to force China into giving up her 1947 claims. But you Filipinos are unable to do that. Not only you, but your de-facto American master cannot either as even the USA is unsure of defeating China in an all-out military conflict today.
And the most ridiculous argument is that the SCS islands and reefs are the Philippines because Aquino III renamed the SCS as the West Philippines Sea. LOL!!! Then why don't you rename all of the world's ocean as the Philippines Oceans, then all the world's oceans will belong to the Philippines!? LMFAO!!!
Anyway, why is the Philippines agitating China on the SCS islands and reefs dispute now out of all other times? Perhaps because Marcos Jr. is a weak leader and in order to maintain his position in power, has to willingly turn himself into an American poodle, and the USA, being in competition with China on many matters, would logically be using Marcos Jr.'s Philippines to put pressure on China in the SCS, although such pressure is comparative small. This is unlike the Philippines during Duterte's presidency when he came a distance away from the Americans and not agitating China on the SCS islands and reefs dispute issue. But that's OK for China though, because regardless of who's in charge in the Philippines, it doesn't have the capability to challenge China. So here is my suggestion to the Philippines if you Filipinos wants to expand your territories: Why don't you ask the USA to cede some of their Pacific islands to you? You have a good relationship with the USA. I am sure the Americans would be glad to give some of their Pacific islands over to you. You and the Americans are friends, right? So go ahead and ask USA to give you those Pacific American islands instead of agitating China in the SCS. LOL!!!
Correction it's WEST PHILIPPINES SEA "NOT SOUTH CHINA SEA"
SOUTH CHINA SEA SOUTH CHINA SEA SOUTH CHINA SEA😉
@@LexieJia👍😁🤣
It is name SOUTH CHINA SEA because philippines does not even a exist as a country when SOUTH CHINA SEA was being name.
Having read most of the comments here, I found a lot of Filipino trolls, if not bots. They are very uneducated, if not malicious as being selective about international laws; cherry-picking parts of laws that favor them while ignoring laws that puts them at the disadvantage. Laws cannot be accepted and applied partially. They are either accepted and applied in its entirety, or not at all. The 2 main arguments that they use are the 1980 UNCLOS, and the close proximity between the disputed islets and the Philippines. Both of these arguments can be refuted easily.
UNCLOS came into effect in 1980, but made it very clear that sovereign claims and ownership made prior to its establishment in 1980 are not nullified by it. China made her sovereignty claims to the South China Sea islets and reefs way back in 1947, while the Philippines' claims were made in the 1960s and 70s. Sovereign ownership according to international norms comes at a first come first serve basis. If the Philippines wants to make its claims to the SCS islets and reefs more legitimate than China's then it should have made those claims earlier than the Chinese did in 1947, and not use the UNCLOS as an poor excuse to nullify China's claims since UNCLOS cannot be used to nullified prior claims by its own definition. Otherwise, there is another solution for the Philippines: fight a war with China and defeat China in order to force China into signing a treaty in which China gives up sovereign claims to the disputed SCS islets and reefs and recognizes the islets and reefs' sovereignty belongs to the Philippines instead. If you Filipinos can achieve that, then do it, otherwise stop barking around.
Regarding the arguments based on proximity, why don't you Filipinos claim sovereign over Guam? Guam is closer to the Philippines than it is to the mainland USA or even outlying Hawaii. Is it becuase you Filipinos only dare to agitate China but not your de-facto masters in the USA? LOL! India's Andaman and Nicobar islands are closer to Myanmar and Indonesia respectively than they are closer to India, so does not mean Andaman and Nicobar do not belong to India? Some of Singapore's sovereign islands and reefs are closer to Malaysia or Indonesia than main island Singapore, so does that mean they do not belong to Singapore? If that logic is correct, that perhaps certain outlying Filipino islands, being further away from Luzon or Mindanao but closer to Borneo are not Philippines but are in fact Malaysia's, Indonesia's or Brunei's. LMFAO!
And please stop invoking the 2016 SCS verdict. That was a political farce orchestrated by Aquino III govt and its de-facto masters in Washington DC, aiming at de-legitimizing China's historical claims to the SCS islands and reefs made all the way back in 1947. It is a farce because the court that issued the verdict was setup by the US-led Western alliance and not the legitimate international court that is the UNICJ. They only used the same venue/courtroom as the UNICJ, but it is not the same court. It is a kin to the unequal treaties that the Western powers forced China into signing in the 19th century. Difference is China back then cannot defend herself, but the modern China can. Truth be told, that farce of a show they call an international legal verdict is useless. The more useful way to nullify China's 1947 sovereign claims to the SCS islands and reefs is again, fight and defeat China in a war to force China into giving up her 1947 claims. But you Filipinos are unable to do that. Not only you, but your de-facto American master cannot either as even the USA is unsure of defeating China in an all-out military conflict today.
And the most ridiculous argument is that the SCS islands and reefs are the Philippines because Aquino III renamed the SCS as the West Philippines Sea. LOL!!! Then why don't you rename all of the world's ocean as the Philippines Oceans, then all the world's oceans will belong to the Philippines!? LMFAO!!!
Anyway, why is the Philippines agitating China on the SCS islands and reefs dispute now out of all other times? Perhaps because Marcos Jr. is a weak leader and in order to maintain his position in power, has to willingly turn himself into an American poodle, and the USA, being in competition with China on many matters, would logically be using Marcos Jr.'s Philippines to put pressure on China in the SCS, although such pressure is comparative small. This is unlike the Philippines during Duterte's presidency when he came a distance away from the Americans and not agitating China on the SCS islands and reefs dispute issue. But that's OK for China though, because regardless of who's in charge in the Philippines, it doesn't have the capability to challenge China. So here is my suggestion to the Philippines if you Filipinos wants to expand your territories: Why don't you ask the USA to cede some of their Pacific islands to you? You have a good relationship with the USA. I am sure the Americans would be glad to give some of their Pacific islands over to you. You and the Americans are friends, right? So go ahead and ask USA to give you those Pacific American islands instead of agitating China in the SCS. LOL!!!
my great china... My soul my heart for china... I can give my life as a gift for china.... Humayun from pakistan china is no 1 and great city great people
FREE Tibet
FREE Inner Mongolia
FREE Xinjiang/East Turkistan
FREE Northern Vietnam and Parcels islands
FREE Manchuria
FREE Hong Kong
FREE the stolen borderlands of India
FREE the good people of China
FREE Falon Gong
FREE the Uyghurs
FREE UA-cam from CCP'S Influence
FREE Taiwan
FREE West Philippines Sea and Indo PACIFIC
Having read most of the comments here, I found a lot of Filipino trolls, if not bots. They are very uneducated, if not malicious as being selective about international laws; cherry-picking parts of laws that favor them while ignoring laws that puts them at the disadvantage. Laws cannot be accepted and applied partially. They are either accepted and applied in its entirety, or not at all. The 2 main arguments that they use are the 1980 UNCLOS, and the close proximity between the disputed islets and the Philippines. Both of these arguments can be refuted easily.
UNCLOS came into effect in 1980, but made it very clear that sovereign claims and ownership made prior to its establishment in 1980 are not nullified by it. China made her sovereignty claims to the South China Sea islets and reefs way back in 1947, while the Philippines' claims were made in the 1960s and 70s. Sovereign ownership according to international norms comes at a first come first serve basis. If the Philippines wants to make its claims to the SCS islets and reefs more legitimate than China's then it should have made those claims earlier than the Chinese did in 1947, and not use the UNCLOS as an poor excuse to nullify China's claims since UNCLOS cannot be used to nullified prior claims by its own definition. Otherwise, there is another solution for the Philippines: fight a war with China and defeat China in order to force China into signing a treaty in which China gives up sovereign claims to the disputed SCS islets and reefs and recognizes the islets and reefs' sovereignty belongs to the Philippines instead. If you Filipinos can achieve that, then do it, otherwise stop barking around.
Regarding the arguments based on proximity, why don't you Filipinos claim sovereign over Guam? Guam is closer to the Philippines than it is to the mainland USA or even outlying Hawaii. Is it becuase you Filipinos only dare to agitate China but not your de-facto masters in the USA? LOL! India's Andaman and Nicobar islands are closer to Myanmar and Indonesia respectively than they are closer to India, so does not mean Andaman and Nicobar do not belong to India? Some of Singapore's sovereign islands and reefs are closer to Malaysia or Indonesia than main island Singapore, so does that mean they do not belong to Singapore? If that logic is correct, that perhaps certain outlying Filipino islands, being further away from Luzon or Mindanao but closer to Borneo are not Philippines but are in fact Malaysia's, Indonesia's or Brunei's. LMFAO!
And please stop invoking the 2016 SCS verdict. That was a political farce orchestrated by Aquino III govt and its de-facto masters in Washington DC, aiming at de-legitimizing China's historical claims to the SCS islands and reefs made all the way back in 1947. It is a farce because the court that issued the verdict was setup by the US-led Western alliance and not the legitimate international court that is the UNICJ. They only used the same venue/courtroom as the UNICJ, but it is not the same court. It is a kin to the unequal treaties that the Western powers forced China into signing in the 19th century. Difference is China back then cannot defend herself, but the modern China can. Truth be told, that farce of a show they call an international legal verdict is useless. The more useful way to nullify China's 1947 sovereign claims to the SCS islands and reefs is again, fight and defeat China in a war to force China into giving up her 1947 claims. But you Filipinos are unable to do that. Not only you, but your de-facto American master cannot either as even the USA is unsure of defeating China in an all-out military conflict today.
And the most ridiculous argument is that the SCS islands and reefs are the Philippines because Aquino III renamed the SCS as the West Philippines Sea. LOL!!! Then why don't you rename all of the world's ocean as the Philippines Oceans, then all the world's oceans will belong to the Philippines!? LMFAO!!!
Anyway, why is the Philippines agitating China on the SCS islands and reefs dispute now out of all other times? Perhaps because Marcos Jr. is a weak leader and in order to maintain his position in power, has to willingly turn himself into an American poodle, and the USA, being in competition with China on many matters, would logically be using Marcos Jr.'s Philippines to put pressure on China in the SCS, although such pressure is comparative small. This is unlike the Philippines during Duterte's presidency when he came a distance away from the Americans and not agitating China on the SCS islands and reefs dispute issue. But that's OK for China though, because regardless of who's in charge in the Philippines, it doesn't have the capability to challenge China. So here is my suggestion to the Philippines if you Filipinos wants to expand your territories: Why don't you ask the USA to cede some of their Pacific islands to you? You have a good relationship with the USA. I am sure the Americans would be glad to give some of their Pacific islands over to you. You and the Americans are friends, right? So go ahead and ask USA to give you those Pacific American islands instead of agitating China in the SCS. LOL!!!
Its summer time. Vacation and fishing season😂😂😂
Hellow this is not disputed island this is include phil. EZZ.
Chinese navy 105 crying.😂
That area is within PH EEZ...therefore NOT DISPUTED.. what is China CG doing in another country's EEZ in the first place?
PM Wong: We will promote ASEAN unity.
CNA YT commenters: Rice stick to fellow rice. Noodle stick to fellow noodle. Potato stay away.
🤷🏻♂
The ASEAN corporate nations will never do any step to displease China, so such ASEAN unity is b.s.
@@rolanaguila3273 I was looking at the live audience at the Istana for PM Wong's swearing-in if any ASEAN heads of state or heads of government were invited, didn't see any
@@rexiansayson Singapore behaves like Switzerland during the time of Hitler. The other corporate countries are the same - trade and finance over any security issues of fellow ASEAN members.
🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭💪
Lol. Some people continue wants to stir the honest nests
It is WEST PHILIPPINE SEA WPS IT'S PHILIPPINES EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE,,,,,, MISLEADING NEWS
There's no West Philippines sea on the world map.
Philippines people must wake up to the fact that eez is not Philippines territory. It's international waters. Eez Entitlement to resources does not meant entitlement to the territory of china and Taiwan.
China and Taiwan owns SCS before unclos even existed. Unclos had no jurisdiction to deny china ownership.
The Chinese must stop their bullying of smaller countries period
No worries, Philippines only talked but no action
Oh, Fragile land want Philippines oil. Sad, PoohTin never give Pooh Russian’s Manchurian oil meh. So Greedy. Fish only a fient lah. Real reason is oil. Invite PoohTin over also because of oil. PoohTin increasing oil price to fragile land. Also not enough coal to feed EV electric needs.
You can't even take back Scarborough Shoal from a fragile piece of land😊
Just grab it, what can you do? Hiding behind your American father and crying hahaha
Pirates go away to WPS.
Fight now...
😂😂😂😂 UN law 200 EEZ .
CHINA EEZ 1 Million NM hahahaha
Tng na nyo
Its not south China sea its a West Philippines Sea if you are in 200 Km
Having read most of the comments here, I found a lot of Filipino trolls, if not bots. They are very uneducated, if not malicious as being selective about international laws; cherry-picking parts of laws that favor them while ignoring laws that puts them at the disadvantage. Laws cannot be accepted and applied partially. They are either accepted and applied in its entirety, or not at all. The 2 main arguments that they use are the 1980 UNCLOS, and the close proximity between the disputed islets and the Philippines. Both of these arguments can be refuted easily.
UNCLOS came into effect in 1980, but made it very clear that sovereign claims and ownership made prior to its establishment in 1980 are not nullified by it. China made her sovereignty claims to the South China Sea islets and reefs way back in 1947, while the Philippines' claims were made in the 1960s and 70s. Sovereign ownership according to international norms comes at a first come first serve basis. If the Philippines wants to make its claims to the SCS islets and reefs more legitimate than China's then it should have made those claims earlier than the Chinese did in 1947, and not use the UNCLOS as an poor excuse to nullify China's claims since UNCLOS cannot be used to nullified prior claims by its own definition. Otherwise, there is another solution for the Philippines: fight a war with China and defeat China in order to force China into signing a treaty in which China gives up sovereign claims to the disputed SCS islets and reefs and recognizes the islets and reefs' sovereignty belongs to the Philippines instead. If you Filipinos can achieve that, then do it, otherwise stop barking around.
Regarding the arguments based on proximity, why don't you Filipinos claim sovereign over Guam? Guam is closer to the Philippines than it is to the mainland USA or even outlying Hawaii. Is it becuase you Filipinos only dare to agitate China but not your de-facto masters in the USA? LOL! India's Andaman and Nicobar islands are closer to Myanmar and Indonesia respectively than they are closer to India, so does not mean Andaman and Nicobar do not belong to India? Some of Singapore's sovereign islands and reefs are closer to Malaysia or Indonesia than main island Singapore, so does that mean they do not belong to Singapore? If that logic is correct, that perhaps certain outlying Filipino islands, being further away from Luzon or Mindanao but closer to Borneo are not Philippines but are in fact Malaysia's, Indonesia's or Brunei's. LMFAO!
And please stop invoking the 2016 SCS verdict. That was a political farce orchestrated by Aquino III govt and its de-facto masters in Washington DC, aiming at de-legitimizing China's historical claims to the SCS islands and reefs made all the way back in 1947. It is a farce because the court that issued the verdict was setup by the US-led Western alliance and not the legitimate international court that is the UNICJ. They only used the same venue/courtroom as the UNICJ, but it is not the same court. It is a kin to the unequal treaties that the Western powers forced China into signing in the 19th century. Difference is China back then cannot defend herself, but the modern China can. Truth be told, that farce of a show they call an international legal verdict is useless. The more useful way to nullify China's 1947 sovereign claims to the SCS islands and reefs is again, fight and defeat China in a war to force China into giving up her 1947 claims. But you Filipinos are unable to do that. Not only you, but your de-facto American master cannot either as even the USA is unsure of defeating China in an all-out military conflict today.
And the most ridiculous argument is that the SCS islands and reefs are the Philippines because Aquino III renamed the SCS as the West Philippines Sea. LOL!!! Then why don't you rename all of the world's ocean as the Philippines Oceans, then all the world's oceans will belong to the Philippines!? LMFAO!!!
Anyway, why is the Philippines agitating China on the SCS islands and reefs dispute now out of all other times? Perhaps because Marcos Jr. is a weak leader and in order to maintain his position in power, has to willingly turn himself into an American poodle, and the USA, being in competition with China on many matters, would logically be using Marcos Jr.'s Philippines to put pressure on China in the SCS, although such pressure is comparative small. This is unlike the Philippines during Duterte's presidency when he came a distance away from the Americans and not agitating China on the SCS islands and reefs dispute issue. But that's OK for China though, because regardless of who's in charge in the Philippines, it doesn't have the capability to challenge China. So here is my suggestion to the Philippines if you Filipinos wants to expand your territories: Why don't you ask the USA to cede some of their Pacific islands to you? You have a good relationship with the USA. I am sure the Americans would be glad to give some of their Pacific islands over to you. You and the Americans are friends, right? So go ahead and ask USA to give you those Pacific American islands instead of agitating China in the SCS. LOL!!!
Bully....
yawa
The CHINA VERY VERY VERY FAR When you compare to the reef that covered EEZ of philiippines.. what the reason why chinese insist which is belong to the philippines.. 🤔🤔🤔
Having read most of the comments here, I found a lot of Filipino trolls, if not bots. They are very uneducated, if not malicious as being selective about international laws; cherry-picking parts of laws that favor them while ignoring laws that puts them at the disadvantage. Laws cannot be accepted and applied partially. They are either accepted and applied in its entirety, or not at all. The 2 main arguments that they use are the 1980 UNCLOS, and the close proximity between the disputed islets and the Philippines. Both of these arguments can be refuted easily.
UNCLOS came into effect in 1980, but made it very clear that sovereign claims and ownership made prior to its establishment in 1980 are not nullified by it. China made her sovereignty claims to the South China Sea islets and reefs way back in 1947, while the Philippines' claims were made in the 1960s and 70s. Sovereign ownership according to international norms comes at a first come first serve basis. If the Philippines wants to make its claims to the SCS islets and reefs more legitimate than China's then it should have made those claims earlier than the Chinese did in 1947, and not use the UNCLOS as an poor excuse to nullify China's claims since UNCLOS cannot be used to nullified prior claims by its own definition. Otherwise, there is another solution for the Philippines: fight a war with China and defeat China in order to force China into signing a treaty in which China gives up sovereign claims to the disputed SCS islets and reefs and recognizes the islets and reefs' sovereignty belongs to the Philippines instead. If you Filipinos can achieve that, then do it, otherwise stop barking around.
Regarding the arguments based on proximity, why don't you Filipinos claim sovereign over Guam? Guam is closer to the Philippines than it is to the mainland USA or even outlying Hawaii. Is it becuase you Filipinos only dare to agitate China but not your de-facto masters in the USA? LOL! India's Andaman and Nicobar islands are closer to Myanmar and Indonesia respectively than they are closer to India, so does not mean Andaman and Nicobar do not belong to India? Some of Singapore's sovereign islands and reefs are closer to Malaysia or Indonesia than main island Singapore, so does that mean they do not belong to Singapore? If that logic is correct, that perhaps certain outlying Filipino islands, being further away from Luzon or Mindanao but closer to Borneo are not Philippines but are in fact Malaysia's, Indonesia's or Brunei's. LMFAO!
And please stop invoking the 2016 SCS verdict. That was a political farce orchestrated by Aquino III govt and its de-facto masters in Washington DC, aiming at de-legitimizing China's historical claims to the SCS islands and reefs made all the way back in 1947. It is a farce because the court that issued the verdict was setup by the US-led Western alliance and not the legitimate international court that is the UNICJ. They only used the same venue/courtroom as the UNICJ, but it is not the same court. It is a kin to the unequal treaties that the Western powers forced China into signing in the 19th century. Difference is China back then cannot defend herself, but the modern China can. Truth be told, that farce of a show they call an international legal verdict is useless. The more useful way to nullify China's 1947 sovereign claims to the SCS islands and reefs is again, fight and defeat China in a war to force China into giving up her 1947 claims. But you Filipinos are unable to do that. Not only you, but your de-facto American master cannot either as even the USA is unsure of defeating China in an all-out military conflict today.
And the most ridiculous argument is that the SCS islands and reefs are the Philippines because Aquino III renamed the SCS as the West Philippines Sea. LOL!!! Then why don't you rename all of the world's ocean as the Philippines Oceans, then all the world's oceans will belong to the Philippines!? LMFAO!!!
Anyway, why is the Philippines agitating China on the SCS islands and reefs dispute now out of all other times? Perhaps because Marcos Jr. is a weak leader and in order to maintain his position in power, has to willingly turn himself into an American poodle, and the USA, being in competition with China on many matters, would logically be using Marcos Jr.'s Philippines to put pressure on China in the SCS, although such pressure is comparative small. This is unlike the Philippines during Duterte's presidency when he came a distance away from the Americans and not agitating China on the SCS islands and reefs dispute issue. But that's OK for China though, because regardless of who's in charge in the Philippines, it doesn't have the capability to challenge China. So here is my suggestion to the Philippines if you Filipinos wants to expand your territories: Why don't you ask the USA to cede some of their Pacific islands to you? You have a good relationship with the USA. I am sure the Americans would be glad to give some of their Pacific islands over to you. You and the Americans are friends, right? So go ahead and ask USA to give you those Pacific American islands instead of agitating China in the SCS. LOL!!!
Before that news, double quantity and twice size Chinese fishing boats sailed to the South China Sea.
.
China just sent 30,000 fishing ships not boat towards Scarborough shoal to show Philippines they can do better.
Tzuc tse tovtung tu tding mao mao
no one condemning china ..what happen to ASEAN to UN???? busy in Ukraine and Gaza war....
ASEAN is useless for the future generations
ASEAN is obviously ignoring Philippines because Philippine acted unilaterally. ASEAN is continuing their relationship with China lol~~~~~ business as usual absent Philippine~~~~.....................................
china do not test US and philppine experience tested you will cry😢
they already tested you by rinsing your flag in front of your face. You did... Nothing... 🤣🤣🤣
All these countries have more immediate and important matters at home looking after their own less previledge and unfortunate people instead of wasting resources and time fighting for land that grass can't grow
These are traditional fishing ground for families from the philippines that depend on it to survive.😒 wasting resources?maybe think before posting
When will CNA stop using the word disputed? Don't you read and heard the Hague Tribunal ruling in favor of the Philippines. or CNA is also pro China?
Having read most of the comments here, I found a lot of Filipino trolls, if not bots. They are very uneducated, if not malicious as being selective about international laws; cherry-picking parts of laws that favor them while ignoring laws that puts them at the disadvantage. Laws cannot be accepted and applied partially. They are either accepted and applied in its entirety, or not at all. The 2 main arguments that they use are the 1980 UNCLOS, and the close proximity between the disputed islets and the Philippines. Both of these arguments can be refuted easily.
UNCLOS came into effect in 1980, but made it very clear that sovereign claims and ownership made prior to its establishment in 1980 are not nullified by it. China made her sovereignty claims to the South China Sea islets and reefs way back in 1947, while the Philippines' claims were made in the 1960s and 70s. Sovereign ownership according to international norms comes at a first come first serve basis. If the Philippines wants to make its claims to the SCS islets and reefs more legitimate than China's then it should have made those claims earlier than the Chinese did in 1947, and not use the UNCLOS as an poor excuse to nullify China's claims since UNCLOS cannot be used to nullified prior claims by its own definition. Otherwise, there is another solution for the Philippines: fight a war with China and defeat China in order to force China into signing a treaty in which China gives up sovereign claims to the disputed SCS islets and reefs and recognizes the islets and reefs' sovereignty belongs to the Philippines instead. If you Filipinos can achieve that, then do it, otherwise stop barking around.
Regarding the arguments based on proximity, why don't you Filipinos claim sovereign over Guam? Guam is closer to the Philippines than it is to the mainland USA or even outlying Hawaii. Is it becuase you Filipinos only dare to agitate China but not your de-facto masters in the USA? LOL! India's Andaman and Nicobar islands are closer to Myanmar and Indonesia respectively than they are closer to India, so does not mean Andaman and Nicobar do not belong to India? Some of Singapore's sovereign islands and reefs are closer to Malaysia or Indonesia than main island Singapore, so does that mean they do not belong to Singapore? If that logic is correct, that perhaps certain outlying Filipino islands, being further away from Luzon or Mindanao but closer to Borneo are not Philippines but are in fact Malaysia's, Indonesia's or Brunei's. LMFAO!
And please stop invoking the 2016 SCS verdict. That was a political farce orchestrated by Aquino III govt and its de-facto masters in Washington DC, aiming at de-legitimizing China's historical claims to the SCS islands and reefs made all the way back in 1947. It is a farce because the court that issued the verdict was setup by the US-led Western alliance and not the legitimate international court that is the UNICJ. They only used the same venue/courtroom as the UNICJ, but it is not the same court. It is a kin to the unequal treaties that the Western powers forced China into signing in the 19th century. Difference is China back then cannot defend herself, but the modern China can. Truth be told, that farce of a show they call an international legal verdict is useless. The more useful way to nullify China's 1947 sovereign claims to the SCS islands and reefs is again, fight and defeat China in a war to force China into giving up her 1947 claims. But you Filipinos are unable to do that. Not only you, but your de-facto American master cannot either as even the USA is unsure of defeating China in an all-out military conflict today.
And the most ridiculous argument is that the SCS islands and reefs are the Philippines because Aquino III renamed the SCS as the West Philippines Sea. LOL!!! Then why don't you rename all of the world's ocean as the Philippines Oceans, then all the world's oceans will belong to the Philippines!? LMFAO!!!
Anyway, why is the Philippines agitating China on the SCS islands and reefs dispute now out of all other times? Perhaps because Marcos Jr. is a weak leader and in order to maintain his position in power, has to willingly turn himself into an American poodle, and the USA, being in competition with China on many matters, would logically be using Marcos Jr.'s Philippines to put pressure on China in the SCS, although such pressure is comparative small. This is unlike the Philippines during Duterte's presidency when he came a distance away from the Americans and not agitating China on the SCS islands and reefs dispute issue. But that's OK for China though, because regardless of who's in charge in the Philippines, it doesn't have the capability to challenge China. So here is my suggestion to the Philippines if you Filipinos wants to expand your territories: Why don't you ask the USA to cede some of their Pacific islands to you? You have a good relationship with the USA. I am sure the Americans would be glad to give some of their Pacific islands over to you. You and the Americans are friends, right? So go ahead and ask USA to give you those Pacific American islands instead of agitating China in the SCS. LOL!!!
@gregoriodelpilar7132, CNA: China News Agency , it's obviously state news propagandist of China expected na natin na mga biased yan pagdating sa pagbabalita laging tama sila at tayo ay mali
asar na asar ang mga tsekwa.
History is very important. Ever since when was it part of Philippines?...immediately after the 2nd world War or what?
Read your history book pls.
Today's world had gone mad.
Historical Velarde Map.Go read about it.
..|.. chao mein
The Spratly islands and the Scarborough Shoal were not ceded to the Philippines.
CONSTITUTION OF THE PHILIPPINES
Article I.-THE NATIONAL TERRITORY
Section 1. The Philippines comprises all the territory ceded to the United States by the treaty of Paris concluded between the United States and Spain on the tenth day of December, eighteen hundred and ninety-eight, the limits of which are set forth in Article III of said treaty, together with all the islands embraced in the treaty concluded at Washington, between the United States and Spain on the seventh day of November, nineteen hundred, and in the treaty concluded between the United States and Great Britain on the second day of January, nineteen hundred and thirty, and all territory over which the present Government of the Philippine Islands exercises jurisdiction.
SOUTH CHINA SEA has been Chinese territory since ancient times, and the United States and Spain have no right to give it to the Philippines.
The South China Sea islands of China include the Dongsha Islands, Xisha Islands, Zhongsha Islands, and Nansha Islands. The Chinese people have been active in the South China Sea for over 2,000 years. China was the first to discover, name, and develop the South China Sea islands and their adjacent waters, and has continuously, peacefully, and effectively exercised sovereignty and jurisdiction over the South China Sea islands and their adjacent waters, establishing territorial sovereignty and related rights and interests in the South China Sea.
After the end of World War II, China reclaimed the South China Sea islands that Japan had illegally occupied during its war of aggression against China and resumed the exercise of sovereignty. To strengthen the management of the South China Sea islands, the Chinese government reviewed and revised the geographical names of the South China Sea islands in 1947, compiled the "Brief Geography of the South China Sea Islands," and drew the "Location Map of the South China Sea Islands" with the dotted line indicating the territorial claims. This was officially announced in February 1948 to the world.
@@LexieJia which ancient time? Under Mongolian Rule? Or just Mao Zedong's stealing the map of Taiwan? Our Velarde map is way much older than the Taiwanese. Xi Jinping's claiming for Taiwan is a joke. He has no jurisdiction over Taiwan.
@@markdeguzman6556 Your words can’t change the truth that Taiwan and South China Sea belong to China l. Just keep it, Philips can’t get a little waters from China.
@@LexieJia Your words cannot change the truth that we won the case. You cannot win any case so you just resorted to bullying and misinformation. You have no other choice but to bully because your legal argument is weak.
Convoy chicken out at 59 to 69 nautical miles!
bong bong ding dong is more concerned about what china is doing in the seas than how well his own people are doing on their own soil.
*PH please respect and cooperate with China if need to use the SCS for your food transportation and stop all this unnecessary tresspassing cos this world is too chaotic with flashpoints*
the world knows that China claim has no basis and not recognized by the International community.
NO TO BULLY OF ASIA!! SHAME IN YOU!!! NO COUNTRIES RECOGNIZED YOUR 9 DASH LNE!!
lol Ph
Anthony Carty, a well-known British scholar of international law, has spent more than 10 years examining a large number of French, British and American National Archives on the issue of ownership of South China Sea Islands since the late 19th century, based on history and jurisprudence, Wrote the book "History and Sovereignty of the South China Sea". Studies show that British and French Foreign Office archives show that their legal advisers repeatedly discussed issues relating to Spratly Islands and Paracel Islands more than 100 years ago. In accordance with Western standards of international law, the legal advisers to the and French foreign ministries have unanimously concluded that South China Sea Islands's sovereignty belongs to China. And the historical archives of the United States, Britain and France make it clear that the Philippines has no claim to any of the islands in the South China Sea. The west and other parties involved in the dispute, such as Vietnam, also acknowledge this fact.
ua-cam.com/video/0CmoRXKhFAY/v-deo.html
Bullshit. China's own published official maps from the Tang to Qing Dynasties, as well as its own 1912-1947 Constitutions clearly indicate that Hainan is China's southernmost territory in the South China Sea.
@@SeaKrait571 I don't know if you are used to lying or simply ignorant. The truth of history is:
The Chinese have called it "Huangyan Island" (Scarborough Shoal) since ancient times. In 1279 AD, Kublai Khan, the founder of the Yuan Dynasty, sent astronomer Guo Shoujing to conduct the "Four Seas Survey Verification". At that time, the measurement point in the South China Sea was exactly Huangyan Island. Official maps published by successive Chinese governments all mark Huangyan Island as Chinese territory. Huangyan Island has always been under the jurisdiction of Guangdong and Hainan Provinces of China. The Chinese government's announcements and statements on the sovereignty of the South China Sea Islands have stated that the territorial sovereignty of Huangyan Island belongs to China. For example, "Taiping Huanyu Ji" (976-983 AD, geographical history book), "Yuan Shi·Geography" (1310-1381 AD, geographical history book) and so on. These documents record the location and name of Huangyan Island and the fact that the surrounding areas belong to China, proving that Huangyan Island was China's inherent territory in ancient times.
During the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644 AD), Huangyan Island was the territory of the Ming Dynasty, and the Qing Dynasty (1616-1912 AD) also inherited and maintained its sovereignty over Huangyan Island. Many legal documents promulgated by the Qing Dynasty, such as the "Qing Dynasty Huidian" (1899 AD), "Yinghai Profit and Loss Law", etc., all clearly stipulated China's sovereignty over Huangyan Island. These historical documents clearly demonstrate China's actual control of Huangyan Island during the Ming and Qing dynasties, proving China's inherent territorial claims.
In 1937, no country recognized that Huangyan Island (Scarborough Shoal) belonged to the Philippines, not even Japan, which occupied the Philippines five years later. After Japan's defeat in World War II, it returned the South China Sea Islands to China. On July 4, 1946, the Philippines became independent and established its country. In February 1948, it was marked as an "eleven-dash line" on the map released by China to the international community. At that time, all countries (Including the United States, Japan and the Philippines) in the world recognized this map, and no country raised any objection to it.
Anthony Carty, a well-known British scholar of international law, has spent more than 10 years examining a large number of French, British and American National Archives on the issue of ownership of South China Sea Islands, Wrote the book "History and Sovereignty of the South China Sea". Studies show that British and French Foreign Office archives show that South China Sea Islands's sovereignty belongs to China. And the historical archives of the United States make it clear that the Philippines has no claim to any of the islands in the South China Sea. Other parties involved in the dispute, such as Vietnam, also acknowledge this fact.
ua-cam.com/video/0CmoRXKhFAY/v-deo.html
In fact, so far, the Philippines has invaded and occupied many of China’s islands and reefs! In the 1970s, China again claimed sovereignty over these territories
After oil was discovered near Huangyan Island (Scarborough Shoal), in 1997, the Philippines claimed sovereignty over Huangyan Island for the first time in history.
On May 7, 1999, the Chinese Embassy in SRB was bombed by the US military. Two days later, on May 9, 1999, the Philippine government used a warship to run aground on China's Ren'ai Reef (Internationally called 'Second Thomas Shoal', Philippines called 'Ayungin shoal'), and It used this as an excuse to this day and still has not left as soon as possible as promised to China after the incident.
Ren'ai Reef is China's inherent territory. This fact is undisputed in history. The Philippines is now trying to use the grounding of warships as an excuse to achieve the purpose of actually controlling Ren'ai Reef in name, However, China will of course resolutely fight back against the Philippines' blatant aggression against China! At present, China still requires the Philippines to abide by its commitment to tow away the stranded warship as soon as possible. For the time being, it is still trying to exercise restraint, using coast guard and water cannons to drive away Philippine transport ships that are trying to reinforce the stranded warship to form a fortress.
In fact, so far, the Philippines has invaded and occupied many of China’s islands and reefs! Please answer, among the other P4 of the SC(UN) , the US, Russia, France, UK, whose territory is occupied by other small countries? Whose country still has a rebel government like Taiwan Province of China? Who would refrain from trying to resolve these issues peacefully? Obviously, China's self-discipline and goodwill to the world are considered weak and bullyable by shameless people. They have invaded and occupied Chinese territory, wantonly spread rumors about China, and formed cliques to try to continue harming China's interests...
No matter who it is including China, which is striving to pursue peace, a gentle giant , the ability of tolerance and patience is limited. The PLA's annual military expenditure is real, and the PLA's capacity development is not just for show.
If Chinese define territory based on the logic of the Philippines - distance, the Philippines is also very close to China, whether in the past, present or future. If you think that the intervention of the United States can deny historical facts, when China gets angry, Americans can run away irresponsibly, but you, as China's neighbor, you will never be able to escape.
In 244 years of American history, the United States has not been at war for only 16 years. From 1789 to 2024, the United States launched 471 military interventions overseas, with 253 in just 30 years since the end of the Cold War alone, far exceeding the total of over 190 years before the end of the Cold War. There is no other country in the world as evil as the United States.
The United States is the source of chaos in the world and the axis of evil. Ferdinand Marcos is leading the Philippines around the axis of evil.
It is undoubtedly suicidal for a hound to urinate in a lion's territory. If you insist on making your motherland a joke for decades to come, the PLA will consider granting your wish to become a clown.
@SeaKrait571 I don't know if you are used to lying or simply ignorant. The truth of history is:
The Chinese have called it "Huangyan Island" (Scarborough Shoal) since ancient times. In 1279 AD, Kublai Khan, the founder of the Yuan Dynasty, sent astronomer Guo Shoujing to conduct the "Four Seas Survey Verification". At that time, the measurement point in the South China Sea was exactly Huangyan Island. Official maps published by successive Chinese governments all mark Huangyan Island as Chinese territory. Huangyan Island has always been under the jurisdiction of Guangdong and Hainan Provinces of China. The Chinese government's announcements and statements on the sovereignty of the South China Sea Islands have stated that the territorial sovereignty of Huangyan Island belongs to China. For example, "Taiping Huanyu Ji" (976-983 AD, geographical history book), "Yuan Shi·Geography" (1310-1381 AD, geographical history book) and so on. These documents record the location and name of Huangyan Island and the fact that the surrounding areas belong to China, proving that Huangyan Island was China's inherent territory in ancient times.
During the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644 AD), Huangyan Island was the territory of the Ming Dynasty, and the Qing Dynasty (1616-1912 AD) also inherited and maintained its sovereignty over Huangyan Island. Many legal documents promulgated by the Qing Dynasty, such as the "Qing Dynasty Huidian" (1899 AD), "Yinghai Profit and Loss Law", etc., all clearly stipulated China's sovereignty over Huangyan Island. These historical documents clearly demonstrate China's actual control of Huangyan Island during the Ming and Qing dynasties, proving China's inherent territorial claims.
In 1937, no country recognized that Huangyan Island (Scarborough Shoal) belonged to the Philippines, not even Japan. in 1945, after Japan's defeat in World War II , it returned the South China Sea Islands to China. On July 4, 1946, the Philippines became independent and established its country. In February 1948, it was marked as an "eleven-dash line" on the map released by China to the international community. At that time, all countries (Including the United States, Japan and the Philippines) in the world recognized this map, there are no other claimant countries except China.
Anthony Carty, a well-known British scholar of international law, has spent more than 10 years examining a large number of French, British and American National Archives on the issue of ownership of South China Sea Islands, Wrote the book "History and Sovereignty of the South China Sea". Studies show that British and French Foreign Office archives show that South China Sea Islands's sovereignty belongs to China. And the historical archives of the United States make it clear that the Philippines has no claim to any of the islands in the South China Sea. Other parties involved in the dispute, such as Vietnam, also acknowledge this fact.
ua-cam.com/video/0CmoRXKhFAY/v-deo.html
In fact, so far, the Philippines has invaded and occupied many of China’s islands and reefs! In the 1970s, China again claimed sovereignty over these territories
After oil was discovered near Huangyan Island (Scarborough Shoal), in 1997, the Philippines claimed sovereignty over Huangyan Island for the first time in history.
On May 7, 1999, the Chinese Embassy in SRB was bombed by the US military. Two days later, on May 9, 1999, the Philippine government used a warship to run aground on China's Ren'ai Reef (Internationally called 'Second Thomas Shoal', Philippines called 'Ayungin shoal'), and It used this as an excuse to this day and still has not left as soon as possible as promised to China after the incident.
Ren'ai Reef is China's inherent territory. This fact is undisputed in history. The Philippines is now trying to use the grounding of warships as an excuse to achieve the purpose of actually controlling Ren'ai Reef in name, However, China will of course resolutely fight back against the Philippines' blatant aggression against China! At present, China still requires the Philippines to abide by its commitment to tow away the stranded warship as soon as possible. For the time being, it is still trying to exercise restraint, using coast guard and water cannons to drive away Philippine transport ships that are trying to reinforce the stranded warship to form a fortress.
In fact, so far, the Philippines has invaded and occupied many of China’s islands and reefs! Please answer, among the other P4 of the SC(UN) , the US, Russia, France, UK, whose territory is occupied by other small countries? Whose country still has a rebel government like Taiwan Province of China? Who would refrain from trying to resolve these issues peacefully? Obviously, China's self-discipline and goodwill to the world are considered weak and bullyable by shameless people. They have invaded and occupied Chinese territory, wantonly spread rumors about China, and formed cliques to try to continue harming China's interests...
No matter who it is including China, which is striving to pursue peace, a gentle giant , the ability of tolerance and patience is limited. The PLA's annual military expenditure is real, and the PLA's capacity development is not just for show.
If Chinese define territory based on the logic of the Philippines - distance, the Philippines is also very close to China, whether in the past, present or future. If you think that the intervention of the United States can deny historical facts, when China gets angry, Americans can run away irresponsibly, but you, as China's neighbor, you will never be able to escape.
In 244 years of American history, the United States has not been at war for only 16 years. From 1789 to 2024, the United States launched 471 military interventions overseas, with 253 in just 30 years since the end of the Cold War alone, far exceeding the total of over 190 years before the end of the Cold War. There is no other country in the world as evil as the United States.
The United States is the source of chaos in the world and the axis of evil. Ferdinand Marcos is leading the Philippines around the axis of evil.
It is undoubtedly suicidal for a hound to urinate in a lion's territory. If you insist on making your motherland a joke for decades to come, the PLA will consider granting your wish to become a clown.
@@WellSalt-Studio lies and fabrications.
@kittyblogger8703 After Magellan led the Spanish expedition to the island in 1521, he was hacked to death by the indigenous people here. At that time, the Philippines was not yet a country as a whole. It did not have a political power that could represent the entire Philippines, nor did it have the so-called 'Philippine sovereignty'. After more than 300 years of Spanish colonization, it was not until June 12, 1898, that the colonized Filipino insurrectionist unilaterally declared independence from Spain and established the Republic of the Philippines, although at this time it did not gain actual control over all of the territory it claimed. In other words, never before had a Filipino claimed national sovereignty over the entire Philippines.
(Please note the Time: At present, the Philippines is using the 3 non-existent islands and reefs on the erroneous map of 1734 as a benchmark to prove to the United Nations International Court of Justice that it "owns" the sovereignty of Huangyan Island.)
In fact, the map of the northwest coast of the Philippines was wrong before the technology of clock manufacturing and longitude measurement appeared, and before the British carried out large-scale field surveying and mapping of the South China Sea in South China, to be precise, before 1806. If you are interested in the relevant situation, please continue reading below.
But eight months later, according to the Paris Treaty signed with Spain, the United States bought Philippine sovereignty from Spain for 20 million dollars, which proved by facts that its sovereignty still belongs to the colonists. After 43 years of American colonization, in 1942, the Philippines was occupied by Japan and became a Japanese colony; After the end of World War II, the Philippines once became a US colony again. It was not until July 4, 1946, that the United States agreed to the independence and establishment of the Philippines. At this time, for the first time in history, the Philippines truly had de facto territorial sovereignty over the entire Philippines.
About 1734 map:
With the help of the overlaying technology of ancient maps and modern maps (a simple introduction, the transparent ancient map is overlaid on the modern map), it is proved that in the map drawn by the Dutchman William Hack in 1690, Huangyan Island ( Scarborough Shoal, The central island of Zeeslange, latitude is relatively accurate, but longitude is 2 degrees eastward by mistake.) It exists at the same time as its two non-existent "ghost islands" (Bovenwater and Croes Rocks) in the north and south. The error of "ghost islands" was inherited by the map drawn by the British in 1728 and the map by Spanish Catholic priest Murillo Velarde Pedro in 1734.
Filipinos claim that the map drawn by Spanish Catholic priest Pedro in 1734 is "the first scientific map of the Philippines". This map in addition to the“Ghost Island Reef” error, there are obvious errors in the mapping of northwest Luzon and other coastlines, but the Filipinos pretended not to see it. The Philippines believes that the Panacot Island Reef among the 3 islands off the coast of Luzon in this erroneous map is the Huangyan Island. But in fact, its image is not consistent with Huangyan Island, and its location is different. Especially when the real location of Huangyan Island and the three islands along the coast of Luzon on this erroneous map appear on the map at the same time, it can be more intuitively proven that Panacot in the 1734 map is not Huangyan Island, even it is quite different from the location of Huangyan Island (The central island of Zeeslange, latitude is relatively accurate, but longitude is 2 degrees eastward by mistake.) on the map in 1690.
In short, during the period before 1778, due to the continuous errors in the longitude of Huangyan Island on the map, it was seriously eastward, making it more like an offshore island in the Philippines, so that some erroneous maps painted Huangyan Island in the same color as Luzon Island, and the so-called "sovereignty" has been wrongly placed by cartographers. From 1734 to 1778, only 44 years later, the error on the map of Scarborough Shoal was corrected. Although Huangyan Island was once classified as a Spanish colony together with the western Pacific islands, it has never been included in the sovereignty of the Philippines.
It was not until 1748 that the British ship Scarborough ran aground on the rocks of Huangyan Island, prompting the British to re-understand Huangyan Island. In the early days, the British still marked the location of Huangyan Island according to the original erroneous map. Finally, due to solving the technical problems of clock technology and longitude measurement, in 1778, Huangyan Island was accurately marked on the map for the first time, but at this time, two non-existent "ghost island reefs" still coexisted with the real Huangyan Island until it was completely abandoned by western cartography circles in the first half of the 19th century. After the map location is accurate, the sovereignty of Huangyan Island can no longer be mistakenly assigned to a colony.
At the beginning of the 19th century, the British carried out large-scale field surveying and mapping of the South China Sea. James Horsburgh first published a map called "China Sea" in 1806. This map makes detailed measurements of the Xisha and Zhongsha Islands, also adopts the Spanish measurement of Huangyan Island in 1800, and announced that in the 1734 map drawn by Spanish Catholic priest Pedro, the three islands and reefs off the coast of Luzon identified by the Philippines no longer exist. In other words, based on the absence of islands and reefs, the Philippines claimsto have 'sovereignty' over Huangyan Island. Due unable to face it, the Philippine government has been avoiding such more accurate maps of the period.
Currently, the Philippines is using the erroneous map of 1734 as a benchmark to prove to the United Nations International Court of Justice that it "owns" the sovereignty of Huangyan Island.
两岸猿声啼不住 轻舟已过万重山🤣
Why Andaman Islands belong to India. They are supposed to belong to Myanmar, Thailand, Indonesia. India is thousands miles away from the Andaman Islands.
@mirrorocean3852
Bingo!! 💯✌️Correct!!
@@loneranger114really?
Exactly. Having read most of the comments here, I found a lot of Filipino trolls, if not bots. They are very uneducated, if not malicious as being selective about international laws; cherry-picking parts of laws that favor them while ignoring laws that puts them at the disadvantage. Laws cannot be accepted and applied partially. They are either accepted and applied in its entirety, or not at all. The 2 main arguments that they use are the 1980 UNCLOS, and the close proximity between the disputed islets and the Philippines. Both of these arguments can be refuted easily.
UNCLOS came into effect in 1980, but made it very clear that sovereign claims and ownership made prior to its establishment in 1980 are not nullified by it. China made her sovereignty claims to the South China Sea islets and reefs way back in 1947, while the Philippines' claims were made in the 1960s and 70s. Sovereign ownership according to international norms comes at a first come first serve basis. If the Philippines wants to make its claims to the SCS islets and reefs more legitimate than China's then it should have made those claims earlier than the Chinese did in 1947, and not use the UNCLOS as an poor excuse to nullify China's claims since UNCLOS cannot be used to nullified prior claims by its own definition. Otherwise, there is another solution for the Philippines: fight a war with China and defeat China in order to force China into signing a treaty in which China gives up sovereign claims to the disputed SCS islets and reefs and recognizes the islets and reefs' sovereignty belongs to the Philippines instead. If you Filipinos can achieve that, then do it, otherwise stop barking around.
Regarding the arguments based on proximity, why don't you Filipinos claim sovereign over Guam? Guam is closer to the Philippines than it is to the mainland USA or even outlying Hawaii. Is it becuase you Filipinos only dare to agitate China but not your de-facto masters in the USA? LOL! India's Andaman and Nicobar islands are closer to Myanmar and Indonesia respectively than they are closer to India, so does not mean Andaman and Nicobar do not belong to India? Some of Singapore's sovereign islands and reefs are closer to Malaysia or Indonesia than main island Singapore, so does that mean they do not belong to Singapore? If that logic is correct, that perhaps certain outlying Filipino islands, being further away from Luzon or Mindanao but closer to Borneo are not Philippines but are in fact Malaysia's, Indonesia's or Brunei's. LMFAO!
And please stop invoking the 2016 SCS verdict. That was a political farce orchestrated by Aquino III govt and its de-facto masters in Washington DC, aiming at de-legitimizing China's historical claims to the SCS islands and reefs made all the way back in 1947. It is a farce because the court that issued the verdict was setup by the US-led Western alliance and not the legitimate international court that is the UNICJ. They only used the same venue/courtroom as the UNICJ, but it is not the same court. It is a kin to the unequal treaties that the Western powers forced China into signing in the 19th century. Difference is China back then cannot defend herself, but the modern China can. Truth be told, that farce of a show they call an international legal verdict is useless. The more useful way to nullify China's 1947 sovereign claims to the SCS islands and reefs is again, fight and defeat China in a war to force China into giving up her 1947 claims. But you Filipinos are unable to do that. Not only you, but your de-facto American master cannot either as even the USA is unsure of defeating China in an all-out military conflict today.
And the most ridiculous argument is that the SCS islands and reefs are the Philippines because Aquino III renamed the SCS as the West Philippines Sea. LOL!!! Then why don't you rename all of the world's ocean as the Philippines Oceans, then all the world's oceans will belong to the Philippines!? LMFAO!!!
Anyway, why is the Philippines agitating China on the SCS islands and reefs dispute now out of all other times? Perhaps because Marcos Jr. is a weak leader and in order to maintain his position in power, has to willingly turn himself into an American poodle, and the USA, being in competition with China on many matters, would logically be using Marcos Jr.'s Philippines to put pressure on China in the SCS, although such pressure is comparative small. This is unlike the Philippines during Duterte's presidency when he came a distance away from the Americans and not agitating China on the SCS islands and reefs dispute issue. But that's OK for China though, because regardless of who's in charge in the Philippines, it doesn't have the capability to challenge China. So here is my suggestion to the Philippines if you Filipinos wants to expand your territories: Why don't you ask the USA to cede some of their Pacific islands to you? You have a good relationship with the USA. I am sure the Americans would be glad to give some of their Pacific islands over to you. You and the Americans are friends, right? So go ahead and ask USA to give you those Pacific American islands instead of agitating China in the SCS. LOL!!!
Potentially another Ukraine like flow of weapons to the Philippines in case of conflict and a blockade of South China Sea by these long range weapons by Filipino military
In 1946, when the Philippines was founded, and if you think about how the name of Luzon came from, China can also take it back
"The History and Sovereignty of South China Sea", a book written by Anthony Carty, has provided academic proof that 'the rule of law says that the islands are Chinese'.
So why can't China arbitrate it??? 😂😂😂😂 .
@@melvinperez1486 The Philippines took the advice from the Americans and unilaterally spent $30m for the PCA award.
There was no reason to spend on prohibitive arbitration costs where the Spratlys were by default Chinese.
@@johntwohy8337 oh really?? So who specifically the American who gave the advice to the Philippines to arbitrate it??🤣🤣🤣 Why are you guys fond of inventing stories?? 😂😂😂 Spratlys , by default are Chinese?? What's your basis? The ever moving dash lines??? Or should I say, DASH LIE?? 🤣🤣🤣. China should stop squatting in the Philippine waters.That's shameful! They are making themselves the laughing stock of the world now. They invented the abacus but they are poor in measurements. 😂😂😂Worst, they cannot arbitrate their historical claims because they know for a fact that their evidences are fictitious. 😂😂😂 All are just based on Feng Shui and horoscopes 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤡🤡🤡🤡
@@johntwohy8337convince yourself with your Book hahaha, just like convincing people with China's "Barbie Map" hahahaha 😂😂😂
@@johntwohy8337Rubbish
The Indonesian authorities would have arrested and sank the boats for fishing illegally in its waters.
scarborough shoal is just 46 km from mainland Philippines whereas China's nearest island Hainan is 1100km. And you dare sank the boats of Philippines just roaming around their own backyard!
@@srebaayao9616 Time will tell if Marcos's leaning towards his ex-colonial master is the correct policy.
The sailors are within the exclusive economic zone of the Philippines, the Chinese are the ones intruding...its easy for you to say cause they are not wandering in your backyard, what the hell are you talking about?
@@htahtoo8851it's Philippines business where it wants to lean on. Basically it doesn't want a lying disrespectful neighbor.
@@htahtoo8851 Let's try?😂😂😂
Not easy to tell the difference between civilian convoy and Philippine navy. They all look the same.
The feeling is mutual. China's militias vessels are by the thousands! All made in China.
lmao WHAT
😂😂
Dumbest comment I've seen so far, you do your research before commenting
JUST LIKE HOW WE CANNOT DISTINGUISH YOU FROM ONE ANOTHER😂😂😂 YOU ALL LOOK THE SAME😂😂😂 DID SOMEONE DID CRTL C+ CTRLV TO YOU GUYS WHEN YOU ARE IN THE WOMB😑😑😑😑😑😑😑😑😑😑😑😑😑😑😑😑😑😑😑😑😑😑😑😑
Philippine's soldiers hide behind the fisher，shame on you😂😂😂😂
Well nothing is more shameful than the SHAMELESS SQUATTERS in the West Philippine Sea called Chinese 😂😂😂😂😂
And China..."The Shameless Country" Hahaha that's a Fact Wumao. Keep trying...😂😂😂
The world knows that China claim has no basis and not recognized by the International community.
They are only copying it from you
China "The Shameless Country"😂😂😂
Philippines will just keep crying because the new they will lose if they try China....So....Philippines cry on~~~~~~
You can keep trying to barge in the Tawi Tawi and Catanduanes . 🇵🇭🌸😘✌️
singapore american colony don't talk nonsense
Where are Americans?
mickey mouse act from a pariah.
Nonsense Hahaha keep trying and crying.😂😂😂
我很好奇，菲律宾有自己的语言吗，他们怎么都说英语呢，
The Philippines demands Chinese vessels to leave its EEZ, uphold UNCLOS ruling, and stop provocations.