I remember him being on the local news when passing through driving the buggy cross country or a long road trip not sure which. I also remember seeing an interview or vid he made himself in his garage giving a basic explanation of how it works. I think it was explained as something similar to pulse width modulation to make hydrogen in the most efficient way possible on the fly without needing an expensive tank to store it in the car or all the losses that come with that from stuff like storage and transport. I think he was expecting something around 90% or over compared to the current 60-80% through electrolysis but hadn't got it officially tested. I think he had 6 car or deep cycle batteries he had to charge every hundred miles to produce hydrogen there where no claims of free energy/beating physics than I can remember. Sometimes when I see him come up and people calling him fake making the free energy claims I think he probably did find some highly efficient way produce hydrogen on the go and wouldn't be surprised if they swapped the patents for fakes and killed him to protect the petrodollar. I also wouldn't be surprised if it wasn't nearly as efficient as he thought and the death was a coincidence.
When you don't know about the laws of physics you believe them. Pity no one else has been as smart ever since. Myers was not afraid at all, he could just do what no other scientist in the world was able to recreate.
Why is there all this attention to "loss of energy in producing energy"? This also happens where crude oil products are being used as a source for power, and nobody argues that it is not usable. So that is not a valid argument against the usage of water as a source of energy. Maybe Stanley Meyer should have formulated it not that explicit? But anyway, there are other problems in using water as a means of energy in vehicles, namely the problem of producing the desired volume at the precise moment. Don't forget that hydrogen in it's purest form is a very powerful explosive and vehicles are prone to collisions, bumping and shocking. If it would be used as a source of power in vehicles their should always be a fair amount of hydrogen ready to use in case a sudden need for power would arise, i.e. climbing hills, evading obstacles and so on. That hydrogen, plus the entire provisioning of the engine, should have to be shockproof under any circumstance. You would probably only be able to use it in armored vehicles that are bomb proof. Not much of a future in that, I suppose.
No, no, no. Hydrogen is no more explosive than gasoline vapors, acetylene, propane etc. It's just another flammable gas. Your comments re shockproof, armored vehicles etc. are nonsense. Bottom line: Myers pretended to overcome the laws of physics, and that is why it is not possible to duplicate his 'success'.
Tesla, hold my beer
I remember him being on the local news when passing through driving the buggy cross country or a long road trip not sure which. I also remember seeing an interview or vid he made himself in his garage giving a basic explanation of how it works. I think it was explained as something similar to pulse width modulation to make hydrogen in the most efficient way possible on the fly without needing an expensive tank to store it in the car or all the losses that come with that from stuff like storage and transport. I think he was expecting something around 90% or over compared to the current 60-80% through electrolysis but hadn't got it officially tested. I think he had 6 car or deep cycle batteries he had to charge every hundred miles to produce hydrogen there where no claims of free energy/beating physics than I can remember. Sometimes when I see him come up and people calling him fake making the free energy claims I think he probably did find some highly efficient way produce hydrogen on the go and wouldn't be surprised if they swapped the patents for fakes and killed him to protect the petrodollar. I also wouldn't be surprised if it wasn't nearly as efficient as he thought and the death was a coincidence.
Intriguing video. You got my sub my friend.
keep it going
When you don't know about the laws of physics you believe them. Pity no one else has been as smart ever since. Myers was not afraid at all, he could just do what no other scientist in the world was able to recreate.
It was fake. That is the reason it has never been recreated or even found.
You can buy kits that can fit any car ,the will need fuel to start the to warn it up then switch over the Hydrogen gas which burns cold
@@MrHangerone in order to make a hydrogen cell you need electricity. You cannot cheat physics.
@@wendellsmith1349You the car Alternater but you get 80amps plus to be Effective .
His "invention" was basically perpetual motion. As we all should know, that is impossible.
Why is there all this attention to "loss of energy in producing energy"? This also happens where crude oil products are being used as a source for power, and nobody argues that it is not usable. So that is not a valid argument against the usage of water as a source of energy. Maybe Stanley Meyer should have formulated it not that explicit? But anyway, there are other problems in using water as a means of energy in vehicles, namely the problem of producing the desired volume at the precise moment. Don't forget that hydrogen in it's purest form is a very powerful explosive and vehicles are prone to collisions, bumping and shocking. If it would be used as a source of power in vehicles their should always be a fair amount of hydrogen ready to use in case a sudden need for power would arise, i.e. climbing hills, evading obstacles and so on. That hydrogen, plus the entire provisioning of the engine, should have to be shockproof under any circumstance. You would probably only be able to use it in armored vehicles that are bomb proof. Not much of a future in that, I suppose.
No, no, no. Hydrogen is no more explosive than gasoline vapors, acetylene, propane etc. It's just another flammable gas. Your comments re shockproof, armored vehicles etc. are nonsense. Bottom line: Myers pretended to overcome the laws of physics, and that is why it is not possible to duplicate his 'success'.
A scam