How Pep Guardiola And Manchester City DESTROYED Enzo Maresca and Chelsea - TACTICAL ANALYSIS!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 26

  • @BryanLammm
    @BryanLammm 8 днів тому +3

    Very good content! Keep it going🔥

  • @elvisminott580
    @elvisminott580 9 днів тому +10

    It’s because Pep is the Teacher, Arsenal next.

    • @TheNextGoalWinsTV
      @TheNextGoalWinsTV  9 днів тому

      Going to be very difficult at the emirates

    • @joesplatnumz
      @joesplatnumz 8 днів тому

      Absolutely 💯💯💯 marmoush will give pressure to CBs alot creating chances for haaland en Foden as well same tactic vs Chelsea 😂😂

  • @YouTuberJames92610
    @YouTuberJames92610 8 днів тому +3

    Pep had no choice but to risk with Khusanov, and besides all the background, there was obvious communication issue with Akanji in his blunder. Anyways, loved the City's team spirit in the game, players intentionally avoided to pass him the ball, as Khusanov was out of breath in shock and needed some time to calm down. Hope he recovers from this shocker debut, from his face we could see the young lad was literally bleeding inside with heart tears. Then suddenly long balls and change of tactic, pure Pep genius. Great game overall, great boost for City's slow recovery.

  • @godDawg_
    @godDawg_ 9 днів тому +1

    Nice breakdown , good quality
    Very good video in general

  • @MoatazCazlo
    @MoatazCazlo 8 днів тому

    good content :) subbed

  • @HabeshaScoop
    @HabeshaScoop 8 днів тому

    Like your content 👏

  • @munyanezagodfrey513
    @munyanezagodfrey513 9 днів тому

    Good job ❤

  • @adewusifelix8339
    @adewusifelix8339 9 днів тому

    If Chelsea had taken rheir chances , there wild av not be anything like guadola master tactics, Jackson shld just go

    • @TheNextGoalWinsTV
      @TheNextGoalWinsTV  9 днів тому

      @@adewusifelix8339 small margins make a big difference. Jackson did have a bad game and nkunku wasnt much better.

    • @NATAR160
      @NATAR160 9 днів тому +1

      What chances? In which game? If the new Man City youngster didn't make that mistake there wd ve been no goal for Chelsea.

    • @harrygonn934
      @harrygonn934 9 днів тому +1

      City had 2.7 expected goals, Chelsea had 1.5 expected goals. City had 6 big chances, Chelsea had 2 big chances via FotMob. These stats show your point is false

    • @abueghan1363
      @abueghan1363 8 днів тому

      ​@@NATAR160exactly Chelsea only had two chances one from the mistake and one from the counter attack . City were dominant

  • @MessymoufEntertainment
    @MessymoufEntertainment 9 днів тому

    City were trash for 70 minutes Jackson stopped every attack even a open net

    • @TheNextGoalWinsTV
      @TheNextGoalWinsTV  9 днів тому +5

      @@MessymoufEntertainment negative. City were better than Chelsea and they were more clinical for sure

    • @theflashhunter1025
      @theflashhunter1025 9 днів тому +2

      @MessymoufEntertainment What are u on about did u watch the game XD

    • @harrygonn934
      @harrygonn934 9 днів тому +1

      City had 2.7 expected goals, Chelsea had 1.5 expected goals. City had 6 big chances, Chelsea had 2 big chances via FotMob. These stats show your point is false

  • @NightOwlCręępęr
    @NightOwlCręępęr 8 днів тому

    RIP MARESCA CHINESE PEP GUARDIOLA WELCOME TO CHELSEA IRAOLA 🤮🤮🤮

    • @TheNextGoalWinsTV
      @TheNextGoalWinsTV  8 днів тому

      @@NightOwlCręępęr haven’t heard that one before 😂

  • @jesusr-grossmuller6446
    @jesusr-grossmuller6446 7 днів тому

    bro, you dont know shit, this is just your opinion why don you and teach Pep how to play better.

    • @TheNextGoalWinsTV
      @TheNextGoalWinsTV  7 днів тому

      @@jesusr-grossmuller6446 me and Pep are good friends. I’ll let him know my thoughts to improve his team