How Guardiola’s Tactical Plan Overcame Maresca

In this video, I bring you a tactical analysis of the match between Manchester City and Chelsea (3-1), highlighting how Pep Guardiola outsmarted Enzo Maresca tactically.
If you enjoy in-depth tactical analyses like this, don't forget to subscribe to the channel and turn on notifications so you never miss any content!
#manchestercity #chelsea #pepguardiola #enzomaresca #tactics #tacticalanalysis #footballtactics

[@Ahmed_onYT]

I've been waiting for this forever. Pep now shaking things up and beating a good team for the first time in so long.

[@themat-chanalyst5344]

In your opinion, why did Chelsea decided to press individually with such an high line? haaland in 1vs1 with that much space is always very dangerous

[@isakmustafa9704]

@@themat-chanalyst5344 Chelsea has sometimes overconfidence don’t know why as a Chelsea fan I still like Mourinho style of playing

[@themat-chanalyst5344]

@ most of the times it actually pays off, but against city is such a dangerous attitude.

[@isakmustafa9704]

@@themat-chanalyst5344 nah I watched most of Chelsea premier league games and when they go for highline and man to man they create problems for themselves

[@Video_Scriptwriter]

Great analysis and breakdown. Already subscribed.

[@Tetsu-s9k]

It was a very educational video!
What editing tool do you use to edit player names and the markings surrounding them?

[@shreyam1008]

Can this be new type of system pep is trying with. Players like marmoush, savio. And how to best utilize haaland

[@kariemreda8374]

Guardiola devoured Maresca, completely humiliating him throughout the match.
Do not stop my friend, continue to cook.

[@isakmustafa9704]

Nah Chelsea had good tactic but city got better players

[@mmjnr10]

As a Liverpool fan I thought Chelsea totally dominated City the first 25 min of the game as they easily could've been 2 nil up if Palmer actually went himself instead of passing as City where in all sorts of trouble at that stage then slowly Chelsea dropped back defending a very slender lead against a new look and unpredictable city side playing at thier own turf... Conclusion Chelsea could've actually won the game if they carried on with thier initial tactics but their naivety upfront and the lack of experience and leadership within the team in addition to thier coach opting to defend a very slender lead was the reason why City won that game..City won it by spirit and utilitising everything negative I already mentioned about Chelsea as Pep still need time to work out a new recipe with his new recruits mainly Marmoush who requires a serious change of style of play to fully accommodate his actual incredible potential otherwise he could actually fail at city if Pep doesn't work out in a way that suits Marmoush attributes rather than make him play a game that doesn't suit his skill set

[@mohamedabdullahi3914]

I don't think pep needs to change much, if uses Gvardiol like last year where he essentially becomes a winger. Foden often inverted from the left, but it's always better to have a right footed player like marmoush in these spaces.

[@Deebankarthick]

Title should be: How Jackson and sanchez exposed Chelsea from end to end 🥲

[@seganekennedy]

Can you request to be at least assistant manager for BLUES..... because I hate this performance.....

[@Natusspiritu]

Hi
Is there anywhere where I can contact you?

[@ahmedbinrobiaa5043]

Where are you from mate?

[@yotsubavilasboas5707]

Com esse nome só pode ser Br

[@iScout-en]

Errou 😅