Best forward to 8.43. No conventional clutch, no torque converter either. Its an engine coupled directly to a 3 speed auto and thats coupled to a 4 speed manual. For a clutch it uses one of the 4 clutches in the auto section to engauge reverse (while disengauging the rest of the clutches) to disengauge the engine, but also reverses the internals to create a braking effect to slow the auto sections output shaft so you can select the manual box (range selector). Its got a torque limiting clutch, but thats a safety feature which normally isnt used.
Thankyou for the good helpfull information ,on the case power shift , Mmmm very interesting , would be nice just to leave in 3 rd power shift , DIRECT DRIVE . And just use the 4 speed manual gears . The reverse when needed .
I’m pretty sure our neighbours used a 2390 and Fox harvester. This isn’t them but a similar set up. Called him “Harvester Willis”. I think he filled over 50 silos one year. I really should ask his son about that story.
Best forward to 8.43. No conventional clutch, no torque converter either. Its an engine coupled directly to a 3 speed auto and thats coupled to a 4 speed manual. For a clutch it uses one of the 4 clutches in the auto section to engauge reverse (while disengauging the rest of the clutches) to disengauge the engine, but also reverses the internals to create a braking effect to slow the auto sections output shaft so you can select the manual box (range selector). Its got a torque limiting clutch, but thats a safety feature which normally isnt used.
Thankyou for the good helpfull information ,on the case power shift , Mmmm very interesting , would be nice just to leave in 3 rd power shift , DIRECT DRIVE . And just use the 4 speed manual gears . The reverse when needed .
I’m pretty sure our neighbours used a 2390 and Fox harvester. This isn’t them but a similar set up. Called him “Harvester Willis”. I think he filled over 50 silos one year. I really should ask his son about that story.
No good RPS lots of problems