Is Russia's Admiral Kuznetsov the worst aircraft carrier ever made
Вставка
- Опубліковано 13 лип 2024
- Aircraft carriers are essentially floating airbases on the sea, equipped with a lengthy flight deck and all the essential amenities needed to support aircraft operations. They are specifically designed to streamline the process of launching and recovering aircraft at sea, enhancing the flexibility of naval operations. These carriers can also be seen as a symbol of a nation's overall wealth. Why so? Well, this is because they are intricate and costly to build and upkeep. This makes only financially stable countries with ample resources able to afford to invest in the development and deployment of aircraft carriers.
Currently, there are 28 aircraft carriers in use by various countries worldwide. The US, being the most powerful nation globally, possesses eleven "supercarriers." China, an ambitious and revisionist nation, is actively working towards expanding its aircraft carrier fleet and is on the brink of deploying a third carrier. India, Italy, and the United Kingdom each have two carriers. Conversely, Russia, often regarded as a weakened force, only has the Admiral Kuznetsov, which some consider the worst carrier. In fact, there are doubts whether it will ever set sail again. so, what makes this aircraft carrier so bad?
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv - Наука та технологія
It's unsinkable during a war. Enemies would prefer this junk to be floating and draining Russia's resources.
If there is any Russian naval asset that can describe what Russia currently suffer, Admiral Kuznetsov is that vessel.
Not much then
Have you any information about HMS Queen Elizabeth? It beats this Russian aircraft carrier. Please read about it.
@@charliebrincat6792it really doesn't, since it is actually a carrier. And doesent keep catching fire
@@european-one Baloney. It is still under repair two years after being commissioned.
@@charliebrincat6792 it's been sailing a hell of a lot more than the russian tin can. Cope and seeth
France also has an aircraft carrier.
and the only nuclear carrier outside the US Navy
@@jheyabines8035 and the only other carrier outside the US that uses Catapults. As a US Navy sailor, I will always hold the French Navy in high respect.
The French carrier is the only non US nuclear carrier as well as it uses catapults, which means it’s the only non US carrier that US carrier based aircraft can land and launch from, and recently joint exercises were done for just that reason, launching US and French aircraft from each nations carrier
Repair work had to be haultes due to fog? FOG? 😂🤣😂🤣😂
Fog is an issue when working with cranes, if the crane operator can’t see the ground or vise versa, you have the potential for an accident
England had better carrier technology inWW1 and that's no joke. They had flat tops that could float and even return to port on their own. This far exceeds the greatest russian carrier by leaps and bounds!
But they lost that skill when they made their two new ones! The Prince of Wales broke down every time it left port!
Insisting that it not an aircraft carrier but an "aircraft carrying supercruiser" does not deter from the fact that it is a shit piece of military equipment. If anything it shows just how obsolete the trashcan is.
Short answer: yes
Long answer: obviously
That floating embarrassment is still a unique "ship" though, it releases smoke like a coal powered steam ship
Man those are some really unfortunate events for the carrier. Especially after 2018 when it became apparent that they might throw another punch at Ukraine... damn such missfortune let's hope it will never recover from that
why would you stop repairs for fog lol
If they are using cranes for lifting equipment, the crane operator can’t see the ground in fog
that ship hasnt been going since the 80s mate
Aircraft carriers are not weapons for defense.
especially Russian carriers
Yes they are, the US for example can project its carriers thousands of miles off its coast if it needed to intercept an enemy fleet. Just like how it was done during WW2
Maybe needs to be used as an artificial reef.
Ali Express ship..
How come it has not been sunk yet?
Edit: it's because it's parked in drydock.
@@gerydazzo4195 Eisenhower Carrier Strike Group is currently in Red Sea. If Russians and Iranians supplied houtis with enough anti ship missiles, your dream could come true :-)
Because it hasn't been used to attack anyone capable of sinking it. Why do you think the US only attacks 3rd world countries?
There are two types of vessels. Submarines...
...and targets.
Tbf, the IJN Shinano is worse, she was sunk on her 1st voyage by a submarine 😅
I would say the British Prince of Wales to be the worst Aircraft Carrier in the World. At least the Admiral Kuznetsov made it to sea, did operations while the Wales broke down every time it left port!
Have you heard of SABOTAGE!!!
Russia sabotages itself by not scuttling that rust bucket
For Three DECADEs? Nah it's cursed.
@@Neojhun No, but from time to time and from structure to structure.
If she sail back, she will not last long.
The Russian Carrier Kutznetsov is like the obsolete Tu154 aircraft...
indias carriers are old russian carriers
But their working unlike Russias
Only one is Russian other is made indian
@@Gr8putin who do you think they copied
@@tammytaylor2472 yeah American engines Israeli radar and Sam and you call Russian model copy
@@tammytaylor2472Exactly what I was going to say.
What makes this aircraft carrier so bad?
First of all, the fact that it is not an aircraft carrier. It is heavy cruiser, whic carry aircrafts. It has rocket armament, approximately equal to the firepower of the entire aircraft carrier group and Kuzia actually developed being able to eliminate those aircraft carrier GROUPS. At once.
So yes, it is very bad carrier, but unique and most powerful heavy cruiser.
Heavy cruiser, Dock queen, call it what ever you want. It is a useless turd of a paddle boat.
@@goatman3828 well, they didn't have the money to take good care of Kuznetsov after the collapse of the Soviet Union.
@@madrankx2372 it was a terrible design from the get-go. Like a really, really Nad design. On the rare occasion when the engine runs it produces so much exhaust that it leaves a trail for several kilometers. Even with a whole ocean to try and hide in that smokestack gives you away. It's so bad that exhaust plume can literally be seen from space! The ship can't ballast right so any turns have to be incredibly slow and incredibly wide. If I rember even the front ramp was put at some stupid angle that makes take offs super risky. All the corruption and skimming of funds meant all subsystems are not even what they were wrongly designed to be. And the bigger problem is this is how everything russian is done. Lowest possible quality with the lowest quality workmanship with the lowest quality parts. Tanks, aircraft, boats, it doesn't matter. Even the body armor! It's airsoft armor for God's sake. And this is how it has been for a century. No education. Just constant propaganda.
Russia used to produce some of the finest scientists and academics in the world. 4 or 5 purges later you have people that steal toilets from Ukraine because they have only ever heard they exist.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 sure, just as effective as SU-57 Chuchilo 😂
You have shown the wrong map of India. Make it correct.
What's the fuel of their aircraft carrier, it discharged very dark smoke.
Coal
Indians disappointed by the Map with no Kashmir should realise whom side these people are. They're not West.
All you can do is avoid this channel ✌️
Aircraft carrying cruiser
Russian aircraft carrier is shitty as their fighter jets which crash all the time 🤣😂
Better one than none
Is it? None wouldn't sit in drydock. None wouldn't keep needing to be towed back EVERY time it goes out. None doesn't need billions in repairs. And none all float.
It doesn’t even work what are you talking about
@LSmoney215 smart money would be to strip it down to the keel. The whole power system was obsolete when they installed it. Gut all the shorting out wiring. Get rid of everything and do it better. Or since it is just so dang old anyway, scrap the entire thing. Start with a fresh piece of paper and try again. If you can find a couple designers and ship builders that are competent and sober, which is realistically unlikely then russia might have a chance of a working carrier.
@@goatman3828 seems like Russia has limited budget. GDP only 1T usd. They really limited due to the war and they lost so many ship not to mention the damage ships
@LSmoney215 Hey, that's on them. With a bit of common sense at the top instead of 'yes men' this current situation could have been avoided. Ukraine would never get into NATO. Not either the Soviet system of corruption they had. But thanks to Putin they are almost guaranteed membership. And he also lost Sweden and Finland. And Armenia is swinging harsh to the West, as is all the ...stan countries that used to be firmly with russia.
No more talking about kuznetsov , this aircraft carrier will be a museum ship , russia builds shtorm and varan , new aircraft carrier
Because they didn’t pull electricity from the shore when it was tied up, they ran the boilers for years on end to power the ship. Unfortunately, this has severely worn the engines and its associated machinery. It needs a new power plant.
i think air craft carriers are just big, slow targets for the newest russian missiles so they see them as obsolete, also they arent interested in projecting power on the other side of the world like imperialist usa and nato lol
They're only interested in invading their neighbours
Just to bring it to your notice, the map of India used was incorrect. Kashmir and Ladakh are integral parts of my country.
When it comes to thinking about it Russia doesn't need an aircraft carrier simply because it's not going to attack countries on the other side of the planet but we all know exactly what country does LOL
Russia doesn’t need a carrier because it’s a 3rd world country, the US has carriers because it relies on weak allies
There are cheaper avenues to project 'Over the Horizon' defense capabilities than air-craft carriers. Drone Carriers should be the concept of the future.
Lol. Lmao even.
To be hounest lol the best of pootins aircraft carriers? is the on in China The Minsk it is a Chinese theme park item lol
The "carrier" is neither here nor there so long as it floats. It's the aircraft launched from the carrier that count. The Russians have very good aircraft, pilots and air defense. The Kuznetsov has attack and defense incorporated in a single ship and does not need a battle group to support it a sea. Anyway the Russian could easily build new carriers if they wanted or needed to. Anyway Carriers are more or less obsolete as they are exposed to submarine, missile and air attack.
That's a lot of cope. The ship can't even sail.
It's worthless , like the entire russian navyy
The USA has 11 Aircraft carriers and 3 of them seaworthy
The rest of them sits in docks.
Which can be immediately activated when the time is needed or when ships are in rotation
thats the difference between "preventive maintenance" and "breakdown maintenance"
@@gamerf1141 If the US lose their available 3 carriers that's all she wrote.
There are two king of vessel
Submarines and Targets
And Aircraft carriers are targets.
False, 3 are at sea while the rest remain in port, they are not unseaworthy, they are just not needed at the current time
@@loganbaileysfunwithtrains606 I saw those bloody ships. They are not in better shape than Queen Elizabeth II not the Queen, the Carrier
They need to scrap and start a new design from scratch, Russia has the potenial.
Russia has the potential? Like their super tank the T-14 that can't even survive a parade? Or it's top of the line SU-57 that can only fly more than 200 kilometers from the combat zone, and only facing away? Or the top of the line anti drone systems that keep getting alone up for, wait for it, drones! The only thing Russia has been able to produce in high volume and top level is alcoholics.
What a ridiculous propaganda piece...
U forgot to mention that it is out of missiles and only armed with shovels.
A carrier is a tool of empire.
Against a peer rival it is just a sitting duck.
I think you miss the most important part of this pathetic sinking bathtub. It makes China's carrier look gooood!😂
any India milatary officialss seen this India map..
Успокойтесь! Это авианесущий крейсер.
Du bist ein sehr dumme Azel. Sehr, sehr dumme.
Или просто посмешище россии :)
@@aleksklochko ты посмещище украины
@@GarageDK подгорело?
Ya ya ya we know the US is superior. Superior at bragging.🙄
Are you some kind of knucklehead? Russia continues to suffer from the problems that come with the dissolution of the Soviet Union, this being one of them.
Tell me one good thing the Russian government does better than the United States’ government.
US has 11 nuclear aircraft carriers? How many does your country have? Regardless I’m sure when your country is at war you’ll be crying for the US to save you
plz put correct map of india. wrong map being shown.
Developed Nations doesn’t gives a fuck about India map . So Calm down 😅
Did I ask u? Blabbering without being asked
Came back at him from the other account😂
You mf use correct map of India
another youtube expert
This channel are so bias
No yu just get mad when yu hear the truth about the poor country that think they are a super power with a gdp of 1trillion usd. They not a super power just a nuclear power. Russia so poor they use poor fuel for their carrier that can’t even make it to open waters
This is not aircraft carier its super crusier, Kuzntezov dont need escort.
Yes it does. It requires a tug with it at all times. It never went out without being towed back.
@@goatman3828 if they could fix that problem, does Kuznetsov need an escort?
Yes it does the tugboat fleet, lol
@jmz2154 what problem? The entire boat is a flawed design. The powerplant is junk. The directional controls keep failing. The whole electrical system keeps igniting. The plumbing can't even function properly. From stem to stern it is a basket case. I have seen reports where the keel leaks so much the pumps can hardly keep up. But Russia doesn't want to lose the "status" of having a carrier. When it has been nothing but an embarrassment and a huge drain on resources that could have been put to building a decent one. Russia definitely has the ability to build a quality ship. But this one is a complete failure.
@@madrankx2372if i had wheels I'd be a bike. Russia will never fix the problem so why even hypothesise?
you mean dieseal
Mazut isn’t diesel
US technologically fell far behind Russia in all kinds of warcraft starting with EMF, jets , hypersonic , submarines, cannons, tanks etc, etc , etc.
🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
@@diavolo217why post toilet paper?
Russia lost its flagship to a country without a navy give it a break ztard
The hypersonic missiles that can be shot down by nearly 50 year old Patriot missiles 😂 the jets that are neither 5th gen nor stealthy, submarines that blow up due to shitty ancient torpedos that have been outlawed in the west for nearly 100 years, tanks that get killed by Bradley IFVs and the average Russian soldier issued a 60 year old rusty AK. Yeah Russia is Sooo superior technologically
another lies, lol
look at the map, why Russia even need ANY aircraft carrier if their bombers can go around the globe, destroy ANYTHING and back home to the other side of Russia?
Americans need aircraft carriers to fight camel riders with sandals and ak47s from 1950s!
in a equal opponents war this aircraft carriers noting more than target practice shooting!
How about start comparing nuclear submarines or nuclear ace brakers?
Admin please correct India map please
USA is riche and have 11 supercariers but has 34 trilion dolars dept..Rich hahhaa
You clearly have no idea how a nation's wealth is calculated, do you?
@@unclescar5616 Not that..just now they lone more then they earn 😉
@@TheVlade11 First that's government dept. Doesn't take away from the fact that the country procuces more than any other in the world.
Seems as though they can afford the dept too. As long as they can service this dept, they build 3 more carriers if they saw please
Yes, Ha Ha Ha. But the joke is that all those carriers, and the rest of the carrier group can leave the dock without the help of a tug boat.😅 Hilarious! Want to know something really funny? 1 carrier group can take out almost any country in the world. ( giggle giggle). Or that the US Navy is the second largest air force on the planet🤣. Even funnier is that the US Airforce is number 1.😂 And all the US carriers all work. 😅
All weather, all the time. 😂 and the putin boat is ALMOST, if it were to ever work, up to pre-WW2 combat abilities.😂 And the only other FUNCTIONAL carriers are NATO countries. 😂😂 But, and here is the best part. You are going to love this....Regardless of US debt the entire world still keeps buying more US dollars!😂😂😂🤑 Damn, so funny I may have pee'd myself a bit.😮 Russia's Navy can't even win against Ukraine, who doesn't even have a navy! Ho my God, almost fell on the floor laughing at that one!🤣😂🤣😂🤣
@@unclescar5616yes not health , millions of homeless sleep andar bridges . Arming people to maximise war industry
Pl show correct Indian map..
Yes they spend all the money in armament how about about the poverty in this country? Is ashamed!
are you talking about america?
Actually, thanks to the war poor regions are currently receiving a lot of money due to decent wages in russian army. There has been quite a few articles published recently stating that bank deposits in poor regions are soaring.
@@SidoniusX ask him😅
What is development without self security or defense?
@@DailyMotivation4448 ask who?
The only country in the west that's technologically advanced is the US.Please don't include any other NATO countries since we all know they heavily rely on the US on almost everything and are incapable.Europe on its own couldn't defeat or hold back a Russian military invasion.There are only 3 countries in the world with mega military advanced capabilities especially when it comes to manufacturing and getting it all out onto the frontlines as quickly and efficiently as possible, that is the US,China and Russia.All other countries are just irrelevant and don't even come close to the main 3 giants of the world.
US fell behind long ago.
Meh Russia has mega military capabilities, but certainly not advanced
Careful, even the greatest of empires have all come crashing down.
@@adriangarcia2793 Advanced than most European and NATO countries.
@@dewetmaartens359 But they can be revived and rebuilt that's what they don't tell you.
Russia has a huge advances in all other warcrafts . Do not need any air carriers when it has 'SARAMAT', 'KINJAL' and 1000 other superior ammo
🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
@@diavolo217toilet paper😊
Russian navy was destroyed by drones powered by satellite internet 😂😂😂
Helllo use India right map ok.....
What a joke? How much debt US has?LMAO.
11 carriers worth how much does Russia have?
@@loganbaileysfunwithtrains606 how much debt? The US is borrowed money from other countries to maintain its military budget.
Fantastic ! Night Hunter 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
Propaganda drum as usual 😊
🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
Correct the map of Indian it’s wrong
Russia cannot be defeated.
URA URA URA URA!!!
Russia is a 3rd world country with a 4th rate military
Military TV, You're fantastic! Let's be friends and have fun!
And NATO cant do nothing to a Russias worst weapons 😂.
Russian weapons 10 × and more time are cheaper and better.
Nato weapons just good for museums or countries without arms like Iraq.
Are you nonsense or bullshit, why you don't show the full complete map of India. Where is our Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh and arunachal pradesh all that states 😡😡😡😡