Pulsar Helion vs iRay Zoom thermal scanner comparison

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 16

  • @AZBADBOYz
    @AZBADBOYz Рік тому +3

    Wow, check out the horses in the barn at 10:45 , that's a BIG difference that could be very important.

    • @yaykruser
      @yaykruser Рік тому

      maybe it goes aways if you select a higher contrast?

  • @guyspooner5832
    @guyspooner5832 Рік тому +1

    Very informative. Have you checked out the new Pulsar Telos LRF xp50 and if so, is it significantly better than the Helion? ( forgetting about the LRF function)

  • @yaykruser
    @yaykruser Рік тому

    Why does google say the infiray has a 25mk sensitivity?

  • @kell7195
    @kell7195 9 місяців тому

    Fantastic review!

  • @mikef5694
    @mikef5694 Рік тому

    Fantastic comparison.

  • @BiggBirdd633
    @BiggBirdd633 Рік тому +2

    Thank God for a review that doesn't include the !@@#$# unboxing !

  • @KROLL712
    @KROLL712 2 роки тому +4

    a 12micron will not present a better image than the 17 micron. The 17um will "absorb" more information due to its larger surface area. If you have two units, one with a 17um and the other with 12um, the 17 will give you a more detailed image. 12um have its benefits being cheaper to produce and can be built in a smaller unit, but to say that it automaticly will give you a better image than a 17um is wrong.
    great video!

    • @coconuts4u269
      @coconuts4u269 Рік тому

      wrong

    • @albyboy4278
      @albyboy4278 Рік тому

      The difference between 12um and 17um is the dynamic range..
      12um has much dynamic range and contrast..
      17um can see and detect much far way.
      "I already have a 17um InfiRay thermal camera"

  • @Ishnala717
    @Ishnala717 Рік тому

    Pulsar....cmon man, you know.

  • @harijsbruns8582
    @harijsbruns8582 Рік тому

    The lower number of microns is WORSE!