Thank you and wish you a Happy New Year Dr Julian! The information you share on CAI give a good insight and is also inspiring to tune into and also grow! Will look at it again and also take a look at the other clips I've missed right after I get free from the project I'm working on.
Remus Grecu’s work is magical. His focus on quality rather then quantity has my respect. Would love to see his vibrant yet balanced color work in person. Freedom is money a friend told me that and it is in my thoughts here. That had I the opportunity I would fly out there look at his work and and immediately fly back here. I hate being away. To begin working on his use of color.
Thanks you Julian. Living and painting outside any urban centres, these small videos give great insights into the figurative work being done, which both informs and validates my own figurative work projects. Great help!
Em poucos minutos ouvindo-o e vendo os lindos painéis do Breson, descobri uma chave, não só das artes plásticas, que é transfigurar em lugar de negar. Que bom que existe essa verdadeira _biblioteca de Alexandria_ chamada Internet e que boa sorte haver seu espaço nela ☘️
Guillaume Bresson! Como se não bastasse o poeta fotográfico também Bresson, conheço aqui na CAI o Guillaume; quase um filósofo da _experiência visual_ como você que nos relata diz. O trabalho do Guillaume comoveu-me por seu olhar um fenômeno recorrente na história da nossa vida social. Principalmente aquele quadro em que há uma arcada pétrea, sólida e quase eterna acolhendo uma vida em movimento. A CAI é um espaço ampliador de nossa articulação e sensibilidade. Agora vou ler os outros comentários. Como numa conversa universitária. ☘, Contemporary Art Issue!
Piet Peere a belgian painter from Brugge also would be nice to be mentioned, his way with color and depicting volume is beyond words for me. Of course, you don't have to listen to me, as you may see it otherwise, greetings from belgium!
-Guillaume Bresson is obviously unable to tune the blue colour. What kind of artist is a painter who don't consider first the necessity to harmonically tune all the colours of his compositions? -Same issue in Sanam Khatibi's paintings: The figures aren't plastically integrated in the composition. This could be, in some sense, related to something symbolic or litterally expressive, but those "non-integration" spots should themselves create something like a rhythm, related to the other elements's rhythm of the composition. Unfortunately, it is not the case: those spots seem to have been randomly disposed, or in a purely symbolic or litteral order, that is NOT the language of painting. The global effect is something like a "bad Dali", which itself easyly stands as "bad neo-classicism" (technically speaking)... - Hwami and Lei could one day, with work and patience, touch something like "truth", I mean world's truth and therefore their own. The other ones are inconsistent and irrelevant, trying again and again to say what has already been the same way by someone else... Very strange choice, in which one can flush out the prominence of ideas and symbols over plastic reality, that IS painting. Lesson #58: "La Pittura e cosa mentale", said "you know who" around 1500... It's not because you stand as "figurative", that you're allowed to ignore painting's specific language: Not ideas, symbols, or other intellectual meanings, but visual quality that may emerge in a true arrangement from shapes, rhythms and (correctly tuned) colours. Maybe it's hard to read, but this way you can be RIGHT or WRONG. If you complacently choose to ignore this, you will make pictures. Museum are alas cluttered by loads of those dispensable things... If you work hard trying to take this crucial point, then you're making paintings. In that particular way, Basquiat is equal to Rembrandt, if that clue may help you to realize what I'm talking about. The problem is, the laws that rule this option are written nowhere: You have to carefully discover them for yourself on each new tableau... I would even warn you, who have the amition to paint: If you find such laws anywhere in cultural corpus, be sure it's a mistake or a lie. The only solution is to patiently refine your work by sight, and your sight by working, to develop that special sense in your mind... THIS only is able to solve that mystery: What to paint or not to paint? You may only paint what the language of painting is able to carry. If you want to paint something you could say by speaking or writing, speak or write it. "Anything is not to be painted, as many believe." said Bram van velde.
Me impressionou seu Artigo crítico e me faz lembrar que o fenômeno artístico completa-se no olhar do apreciador. Your critical article impressed me and reminds me that the artistic phenomenon is complete in the gaze of the connoisseur.
@@vicentejouclas2518 Thank you. The key is, no one can really understand painting without having once painted. That special perceptive sense can only be fully developed by painting. Words are words; sight is sight. Nothing to add. Therefore I let you guess where my "knowledge" of this comes from... Please go and read the last sentence of my previous message: there was a mistake in Bram Van Velde's quote, I just corrected. Sorry.
@@oryjen ; Thank you. I reread your correction on Bram van velde's sentence: _"... is to be painted, ... believe." From the first reading I had difficulty understanding it. There is logical complexity in it, but a simple color or visual texture starts a creative process in an artist. At least one visual experience at a glance. What do you think about being able to say: _If you want to say or write something that you could say by painting, paint._?
@@vicentejouclas2518 Of course, it works in that way too! And about Bram's sentence, the key word is "NOT": You may NOT paint ANYTHING, or EVERYTHING... especially ideas, concepts. Painting is a language, with its grammar and syntax, and its proper field. But its alphabet is very very large, maybe infinite... Something like an agglomerating language if you want... That language may aim at particular goals. Not ideas, not concepts, but sometfhing else, that has to deal with truth: Truth of yourself, truth (OBJECTIVE truth) of the world, therefore truth of life experience, out of any tale, any disquisition; out of the narrative. That language allows you to touch that kind of truth, and the way you touch it, or "discover" it, builds the proper language. Through proper painting, you experience something like a revelation. Slow, smooth, subtle, but really transforming your life.
Alice Neel is a terrific figurative painter, but we wouldn't do her impressive career any justice to say she's an emerging artist. I recently visited her major retrospective at Centre Pompidou in Paris and was blown away once again by her work.
@@contemporaryartissue yes of course she isn´t emerging :) it was more a historic example, i visited her restrospective in San Francisco last spring and in Hamburg
I am so glad to see such satisfying, interesting new work by artists who are not all old, white men. I love some works by old white men to be sure. But great art is not made by one race and one gender and by persons in one decade of their lifespan. Thanks for taking the trouble to look around. Thank you to the gallery owners who represent new artists without taking advantage of them unfairly as some do
Hi there, in this video we are discussing emerging artists as stated in the title and not the established artists as in your recital. Nevertheless, great recital! Thank you for tuning in
You might want to have a look at Johan Barrios' work...Mr.Hadjab's work is quite similar....I thought of Barrios' work immediately when I saw this video...
Hi Jenny, yes, I know Johan Barrios' work pretty well, actually. He used to be one of my favorite artists one day, but now I believe his development stagnated the past five years, lacking variety, and sticking to his current "formula." Would've liked to see him grow and explore further considering his talent
@@contemporaryartissue hmmm. Interesting perspective. I agree his earlier work feels more dynamic than his recent work, but I don't think his 'development' is over yet , nor is his work stagnated(an artist's progress is always in this phase and it never really ends!). Additionally there is a massive amount of skill ,both acquired and developing, that constitutes all of his work, which is masterful. That is not to discount the work of your current favorite Dhewadi Hadjab, also skillful and interesting, but I'd like to see something different from him (that is different than Barrios) as I feel like Barrios had that gig covered. Perhaps he could take the idea,(as he has somewhat) and push it further somehow...in both cases, if I could make work of that quality, Id be pretty happy! : )
@@jennypage7991 Yes, he is tremendously skillful-but in terms of the subject matter, his development has stagnated and thus his work has become a bit predictable. Nevertheless, I respect his work strongly and still enjoy seeing his works. Thank you for the nice talk!
@@contemporaryartissue Hi Julian, ~again, I would not have said stagnated, but that's art-subjective, no? Yes, nice and interesting discussion! Merci! PS. I love the music use in your videos-!!adds a nice touch and I'd love to know the musician, if you are so inclined. merci, encore.
i don't want to sound like a troll here but the first few painters were sort of photoshoped photos that were painted. i mean, yeah, composition wise they look different from the others but i cant seem to find anything in their works, just images. it feels like they were just trying to create a visually astounding painting but is not really really saying anything. sorry to compare but beksinski's works were also painted with great skill and he tells people that they dont mean any specific thing but when you see them, they do.
Hi Redd, thank you for tuning in. Good point, but I have to disagree. It might seem this way but when delving deeper, there is much more than a beautiful image. Especially with Remus Grecu, who doesn't use photoshop to create this pictures. It is filled with symbolic constructions resulting in an exuberant image instead of the other way around.
@@contemporaryartissue ey, remus' works are one of the artists that I really admire. not the ones im talking about but hey, thatnks for taking the time to reply.
Aside from Sanam Khatibi, which is reasonably okay...the rest is utter regressive kitsch, sorry. In my opinion you could name these, which range from very good to quite okay e.g. Andre Butzer figurative paintings, Michel Majerus, Louise Bonnet, Katherine Bernhardt and Trey Abdella as the youngest.
@@Lollero200q Yeah, I thought about not including Majerus, but somehow he's just as fresh as he was then. Xie Lei is such a creepy/horror kitsch then better Miriam Cahn...
First, a great recital of artists on your part, so thank you for sharing. Your anthology also makes it clear what your (good) taste is when it comes to figurative art; bold, fresh, colorful, free, and playful paintings-a type of painting a really enjoy as well. For this list, we opted to select more distinctive figurative painters with a more naturalist visual language; something which isn't everyone's cup of tea, of course. Nevertheless, thank you for tuning in and for sharing your thoughts! All my best, Julien
Breathtakingly marvellous to see art without the defiant inclusion of womens vaginas in minute detail. To all you artists out there running out of ideas, painting the vaginas of women is third rate art.
I assume you are an "art critic"? Many words to "embellish" an artist's work, however, what most artists want to hear is educational background, mediums(s), compositional strategies, and the environment they live within. ALL other words are nonsense.
Interesting opinion. I think trans artists are making the more interesting art to be honest. Behind them it’s gay people of colour, then sis women, then Asians, then white gays, then little people, then wheelchair users, then the blind, then the deaf, and then straight white men. Can we all at least agree that art should only be valued and viewed through an identity based lens please.
We have one Asian artist, a Middle-Eastern artist, a North-African artist, a South-African artist, a Middle-European artist, and a West-European artist. So I believe this selection has a very decent amount of diversity.
There are far more interesting figurative printers , but not so well known.This ones , conceptually are basic , with total lack of creativity .But that’s the trend nowadays.This works are simply “pretty”..
I believe we'll have to agree to disagree on this one; some of these painters have some very complex iconographies and go beyond being merely "pretty pictures" or crafstmanship. Nevertheless, thank you for tuning in and feel free to share some of the figurative painters you enjoy the most!
Political messaging deos not enhance the artistic qualities of paintings becasue this has nothing to do with aesthetics. Instead, they distract from quality. Painting is not pamfletteering, it must have intrinsic painterly qualities. Only Bresson and Hadjab demonstrate obvious painterly qualities, the rest is well-meant but flawed pamfletteering, thin and cheap. 'Figurative' is no garantee for quality.
Art is not only about aesthetics or skill. Great art is also a conversation piece, it moves people or feels refreshing and new. Art is a feast and there is enough art for everyone's personal taste. Thank you for tuning in!
@@contemporaryartissue Painterly qualities never exclude the possibility of being a conversation piece, or of moving people, or being refreshing and new. Look at history: all the great painters were all of these things. It was a whole package. Where artists look down on painterly qualities or aesthetics, they simply betray their flaws, they are not artists at all.
I believe academic painters are the equivalent of classical musicians. Contemporary painting can also be figurative-as is the case with this selection. Thank you for tuning in!
I disagree strongly on Khatibi. There is a very clear connection with Bosch and her aesthetic is consciously unnaturalistic. It feels refreshing and contemporary-while remaining a high-end overall feeling.
Very interesting artists, but why begins this man his sentences clearly and sinks into inaudible mumbling at their end? Any useful information hidden in the tails of the lines is being lost.
Thank you for being part of my daily appreciation of visual art.
These artists are previously unknown to me.
Thank you, John. The pleasure is all mine. Happy to hear you discovered some new artists. Have a great day and all the best for 2023!
Thank you and wish you a Happy New Year Dr Julian! The information you share on CAI give a good insight and is also inspiring to tune into and also grow!
Will look at it again and also take a look at the other clips I've missed right after I get free from the project I'm working on.
Dear Amaresh, thank you so much for tuning in and for your very kind words. My very best wishes for 2023 to you too! All my best, Julien
Remus Grecu’s work is magical. His focus on quality rather then quantity has my respect. Would love to see his vibrant yet balanced color work in person. Freedom is money a friend told me that and it is in my thoughts here. That had I the opportunity I would fly out there look at his work and and immediately fly back here. I hate being away. To begin working on his use of color.
Thanks you Julian. Living and painting outside any urban centres, these small videos give great insights into the figurative work being done, which both informs and validates my own figurative work projects. Great help!
That's wonderful. Go for it!
You are doing a great work, Julian. Thank you so much, what you are building is becoming an invaluable resource for artists. 🥋
Thank you for those most kind words, I appreciate it! Have a great day 🙏
Exactly, thank you!
Em poucos minutos ouvindo-o e vendo os lindos painéis do Breson, descobri uma chave, não só das artes plásticas, que é transfigurar em lugar de negar.
Que bom que existe essa verdadeira _biblioteca de Alexandria_ chamada Internet e que boa sorte haver seu espaço nela ☘️
Em poucos segundos escutando-o ampliei o conceito de arte imerciva!
Guillaume Bresson! Como se não bastasse o poeta fotográfico também Bresson, conheço aqui na CAI o Guillaume; quase um filósofo da _experiência visual_ como você que nos relata diz.
O trabalho do Guillaume comoveu-me por seu olhar um fenômeno recorrente na história da nossa vida social. Principalmente aquele quadro em que há uma arcada pétrea, sólida e quase eterna acolhendo uma vida em movimento.
A CAI é um espaço ampliador de nossa articulação e sensibilidade.
Agora vou ler os outros comentários. Como numa conversa universitária.
☘, Contemporary Art Issue!
He is a terrific artist indeed and the painting you mention is one of my personal favorites by Bresson. Thank you so much as always!
Thanks!!Useful video.
That's great, have a terrific day!
great Video! Thank you!
Thank you so much, the pleasure is all mine
Thanks a million for your work
The pleasure is all mine. Thank you for tuning in!
Love the work of Xie Lei, thanks for this discovery !
Yes, he's one of my personal favorites as well! The pleasure is all mine :-)
Thank you for introducing us to these brilliant artists and their wonderful works. Truly inspiring.
The pleasure is all mine, thank you for tuning in!
Thank you for amazing content
The pleasure is all mine, thank you for tuning in!
thank you 👍🏼
The pleasure is all mine, thank you for tuning in!
Love you videos, could you do something about conceptual realism.?
thanks for sharing
The pleasure is all mine! Thank you for tuning in
Piet Peere a belgian painter from Brugge also would be nice to be mentioned, his way with color and depicting volume is beyond words for me. Of course, you don't have to listen to me, as you may see it otherwise, greetings from belgium!
Thank you for the suggestion and for tuning in! Have a great 2023!
Now i just have to start my art career and maybe one day I’ll be on this list 😅
Valeu!
Thank you so much Vicente!
-Guillaume Bresson is obviously unable to tune the blue colour. What kind of artist is a painter who don't consider first the necessity to harmonically tune all the colours of his compositions?
-Same issue in Sanam Khatibi's paintings: The figures aren't plastically integrated in the composition. This could be, in some sense, related to something symbolic or litterally expressive, but those "non-integration" spots should themselves create something like a rhythm, related to the other elements's rhythm of the composition. Unfortunately, it is not the case: those spots seem to have been randomly disposed, or in a purely symbolic or litteral order, that is NOT the language of painting. The global effect is something like a "bad Dali", which itself easyly stands as "bad neo-classicism" (technically speaking)...
- Hwami and Lei could one day, with work and patience, touch something like "truth", I mean world's truth and therefore their own.
The other ones are inconsistent and irrelevant, trying again and again to say what has already been the same way by someone else...
Very strange choice, in which one can flush out the prominence of ideas and symbols over plastic reality, that IS painting.
Lesson #58: "La Pittura e cosa mentale", said "you know who" around 1500... It's not because you stand as "figurative", that you're allowed to ignore painting's specific language: Not ideas, symbols, or other intellectual meanings, but visual quality that may emerge in a true arrangement from shapes, rhythms and (correctly tuned) colours.
Maybe it's hard to read, but this way you can be RIGHT or WRONG.
If you complacently choose to ignore this, you will make pictures. Museum are alas cluttered by loads of those dispensable things...
If you work hard trying to take this crucial point, then you're making paintings.
In that particular way, Basquiat is equal to Rembrandt, if that clue may help you to realize what I'm talking about.
The problem is, the laws that rule this option are written nowhere: You have to carefully discover them for yourself on each new tableau...
I would even warn you, who have the amition to paint: If you find such laws anywhere in cultural corpus, be sure it's a mistake or a lie.
The only solution is to patiently refine your work by sight, and your sight by working, to develop that special sense in your mind...
THIS only is able to solve that mystery: What to paint or not to paint? You may only paint what the language of painting is able to carry.
If you want to paint something you could say by speaking or writing, speak or write it.
"Anything is not to be painted, as many believe." said Bram van velde.
Me impressionou seu Artigo crítico e me faz lembrar que o fenômeno artístico completa-se no olhar do apreciador.
Your critical article impressed me and reminds me that the artistic phenomenon is complete in the gaze of the connoisseur.
@@vicentejouclas2518 Thank you.
The key is, no one can really understand painting without having once painted.
That special perceptive sense can only be fully developed by painting.
Words are words; sight is sight.
Nothing to add.
Therefore I let you guess where my "knowledge" of this comes from...
Please go and read the last sentence of my previous message: there was a mistake in Bram Van Velde's quote, I just corrected. Sorry.
@@oryjen ; Thank you.
I reread your correction on Bram van velde's sentence: _"... is to be painted, ... believe."
From the first reading I had difficulty understanding it. There is logical complexity in it, but a simple color or visual texture starts a creative process in an artist. At least one visual experience at a glance.
What do you think about being able to say: _If you want to say or write something that you could say by painting, paint._?
@@vicentejouclas2518 Of course, it works in that way too!
And about Bram's sentence, the key word is "NOT": You may NOT paint ANYTHING, or EVERYTHING... especially ideas, concepts.
Painting is a language, with its grammar and syntax, and its proper field. But its alphabet is very very large, maybe infinite... Something like an agglomerating language if you want...
That language may aim at particular goals. Not ideas, not concepts, but sometfhing else, that has to deal with truth: Truth of yourself, truth (OBJECTIVE truth) of the world, therefore truth of life experience, out of any tale, any disquisition; out of the narrative.
That language allows you to touch that kind of truth, and the way you touch it, or "discover" it, builds the proper language.
Through proper painting, you experience something like a revelation. Slow, smooth, subtle, but really transforming your life.
Figurative or abstract?
I'm a painter and galleries,shows often argue my category..?figurative or abstract expressionist..🤣✌️💯
I made a typo indeed before the premiere. Your comment made me aware of it so thanks a million!
you should talk about future of NFT and traditional art ....
Sounds like a great suggestion! And thank you for tuning in!
Alice Neel!!
Alice Neel is a terrific figurative painter, but we wouldn't do her impressive career any justice to say she's an emerging artist. I recently visited her major retrospective at Centre Pompidou in Paris and was blown away once again by her work.
@@contemporaryartissue yes of course she isn´t emerging :) it was more a historic example, i visited her restrospective in San Francisco last spring and in Hamburg
@@willywonka1854 That's great!
I am so glad to see such satisfying, interesting new work by artists who are not all old, white men. I love some works by old white men to be sure. But great art is not made by one race and one gender and by persons in one decade of their lifespan. Thanks for taking the trouble to look around. Thank you to the gallery owners who represent new artists without taking advantage of them unfairly as some do
A great set of artists indeed. Thank you for tuning in and wishing you a great day!
Okay, but where are the really good realists, like Odd Nerdrum, Helnwein, Anton Hoeger, Jenny Saville, and a lot of Spanish artsits?
Hi there, in this video we are discussing emerging artists as stated in the title and not the established artists as in your recital. Nevertheless, great recital! Thank you for tuning in
You might want to have a look at Johan Barrios' work...Mr.Hadjab's work is quite similar....I thought of Barrios' work immediately when I saw this video...
Hi Jenny, yes, I know Johan Barrios' work pretty well, actually. He used to be one of my favorite artists one day, but now I believe his development stagnated the past five years, lacking variety, and sticking to his current "formula." Would've liked to see him grow and explore further considering his talent
@@contemporaryartissue hmmm. Interesting perspective. I agree his earlier work feels more dynamic than his recent work, but I don't think his 'development' is over yet , nor is his work stagnated(an artist's progress is always in this phase and it never really ends!). Additionally there is a massive amount of skill ,both acquired and developing, that constitutes all of his work, which is masterful. That is not to discount the work of your current favorite Dhewadi Hadjab, also skillful and interesting, but I'd like to see something different from him (that is different than Barrios) as I feel like Barrios had that gig covered. Perhaps he could take the idea,(as he has somewhat) and push it further somehow...in both cases, if I could make work of that quality, Id be pretty happy! : )
@@jennypage7991 Yes, he is tremendously skillful-but in terms of the subject matter, his development has stagnated and thus his work has become a bit predictable. Nevertheless, I respect his work strongly and still enjoy seeing his works. Thank you for the nice talk!
@@contemporaryartissue Hi Julian, ~again, I would not have said stagnated, but that's art-subjective, no? Yes, nice and interesting discussion! Merci! PS. I love the music use in your videos-!!adds a nice touch and I'd love to know the musician, if you are so inclined. merci, encore.
@@jennypage7991 The music is an anonymous jazz piece I bought a while ago-I love those tunes!
All these picks have a sort of classists aesthetics to them.
👌💕
❤️🙌
Marcus Wills - look him up!
Great painter, great suggestion! Thank you!
I like your work. But the dog has a difficult life😅
Hi. Could you at some Point do a similar video about sculptors. Thanks.
Absolutely! Terrific suggestion
i don't want to sound like a troll here but the first few painters were sort of photoshoped photos that were painted. i mean, yeah, composition wise they look different from the others but i cant seem to find anything in their works, just images. it feels like they were just trying to create a visually astounding painting but is not really really saying anything. sorry to compare but beksinski's works were also painted with great skill and he tells people that they dont mean any specific thing but when you see them, they do.
Hi Redd, thank you for tuning in. Good point, but I have to disagree. It might seem this way but when delving deeper, there is much more than a beautiful image. Especially with Remus Grecu, who doesn't use photoshop to create this pictures. It is filled with symbolic constructions resulting in an exuberant image instead of the other way around.
@@contemporaryartissue ey, remus' works are one of the artists that I really admire. not the ones im talking about but hey, thatnks for taking the time to reply.
Thanks for video but why there are only male artists?
Dear Natalya, thank you for tuning in. Kudzanai-Violet Hwami and Sanam Khatibi are female artists. Have a great day!
@@contemporaryartissue thanks! Great!
Good doggie.
She's the best! Thank you for tuning in
Just as I thought--no competition--
🙂👀🙂
Thanks Ivan!
🐶🐕😇😇
Aside from Sanam Khatibi, which is reasonably okay...the rest is utter regressive kitsch, sorry. In my opinion you could name these, which range from very good to quite okay e.g. Andre Butzer figurative paintings, Michel Majerus, Louise Bonnet, Katherine Bernhardt and Trey Abdella as the youngest.
Oof.. I kinda agree but why include Majerus who has been long dead. Xie Lei paintings are quite nice also
@@Lollero200q Yeah, I thought about not including Majerus, but somehow he's just as fresh as he was then. Xie Lei is such a creepy/horror kitsch then better Miriam Cahn...
@@BigBuddha3 true!
First, a great recital of artists on your part, so thank you for sharing. Your anthology also makes it clear what your (good) taste is when it comes to figurative art; bold, fresh, colorful, free, and playful paintings-a type of painting a really enjoy as well. For this list, we opted to select more distinctive figurative painters with a more naturalist visual language; something which isn't everyone's cup of tea, of course. Nevertheless, thank you for tuning in and for sharing your thoughts! All my best, Julien
Glad to see that at least one painter wasn't working from photos.
Not impressed with Hwami even a little bit. Bresson, Grecu, and Hadjab are great.
De gustibus et coloribus non est disputandum. I also believe all six are very different, so there something for everyone I believe.
I have a dog that looks exactly like your dog. I wonder if they are brothers my was from Washington d.c.
That's great! She's a female British golden retriever-she was born here in Belgium. They are the best and the cutest!
Breathtakingly marvellous to see art without the defiant inclusion of womens vaginas in minute detail. To all you artists out there running out
of ideas, painting the vaginas of women is third rate art.
This video is beautiful . All of it. Thank you
The dog is bored out of its mind lol
Tired from her walk and having a nice meal, yet dreaming of more treats. She's the best!
liu Xiaodong
Terrific painter! However, presenting him as "emerging" wouldn't do him justice considering his illustrious career. Thank you for tuning in
I assume you are an "art critic"? Many words to "embellish" an artist's work, however, what most artists want to hear is educational background, mediums(s), compositional strategies, and the environment they live within. ALL other words are nonsense.
Figutative 😴
I was hoping to see more African or artists of colour on this list as there are producing the most interesting figurative work now
Interesting opinion.
I think trans artists are making the more interesting art to be honest. Behind them it’s gay people of colour, then sis women, then Asians, then white gays, then little people, then wheelchair users, then the blind, then the deaf, and then straight white men.
Can we all at least agree that art should only be valued and viewed through an identity based lens please.
That is only your opinion. I have never seen anything I like from that sector.
We have one Asian artist, a Middle-Eastern artist, a North-African artist, a South-African artist, a Middle-European artist, and a West-European artist. So I believe this selection has a very decent amount of diversity.
@@contemporaryartissue exactly… she’s trying to make a point without doing research first..
I second this ,
There are far more interesting figurative printers , but not so well known.This ones , conceptually are basic , with total lack of creativity .But that’s the trend nowadays.This works are simply “pretty”..
I believe we'll have to agree to disagree on this one; some of these painters have some very complex iconographies and go beyond being merely "pretty pictures" or crafstmanship. Nevertheless, thank you for tuning in and feel free to share some of the figurative painters you enjoy the most!
There’s nothing new here
Political messaging deos not enhance the artistic qualities of paintings becasue this has nothing to do with aesthetics. Instead, they distract from quality. Painting is not pamfletteering, it must have intrinsic painterly qualities. Only Bresson and Hadjab demonstrate obvious painterly qualities, the rest is well-meant but flawed pamfletteering, thin and cheap. 'Figurative' is no garantee for quality.
Art is not only about aesthetics or skill. Great art is also a conversation piece, it moves people or feels refreshing and new. Art is a feast and there is enough art for everyone's personal taste. Thank you for tuning in!
@@contemporaryartissue Painterly qualities never exclude the possibility of being a conversation piece, or of moving people, or being refreshing and new. Look at history: all the great painters were all of these things. It was a whole package. Where artists look down on painterly qualities or aesthetics, they simply betray their flaws, they are not artists at all.
'Figurative' painters are the equivalent of classical musicians. 'Contemporary' painters are the equivalent of popular musicians.
I believe academic painters are the equivalent of classical musicians. Contemporary painting can also be figurative-as is the case with this selection. Thank you for tuning in!
You said ''reminiscent of Bosch".......that looks like a toddler's work compared to Bosch........PLEASE STOP
I disagree strongly on Khatibi. There is a very clear connection with Bosch and her aesthetic is consciously unnaturalistic. It feels refreshing and contemporary-while remaining a high-end overall feeling.
dog. all I see is dog.
😂 100% accurate
Iam not really impressed by these talents.
Only two women? You serious? Dislike!
Your solution to this would be? Force women to paint, just to make up the numbers?
Yes, that's shocking. And no transexuals too, that's horrendous. And how many are homosexuals if at all? Where is the world going?
Well, two out of six, meaning 33%.
Very interesting artists, but why begins this man his sentences clearly and sinks into inaudible mumbling at their end? Any useful information hidden in the tails of the lines is being lost.
👆🏾👆🏾👆🏾 what he said