To be fair celsius is degree scale (every degree celsius is equally spaced, 0⁰C is the freezing point of water and isnt the bottom of the scale also negative temperatures don't indicate negative energy increments ) Kelvin in an absolute scale (every K is equally spaced same distance of celsius but 0 K means 0 and cant get colder in an appreciable sense, this also means 20 K is twice as hot as 10 K
Bah, the °N scale deviced by Sir Isaac Newton introduces the use of freezing and boiling of water (used by Kelvin and Celsius) aswell as the temperature of the human body (Used by Fahrenheit) as reference points. So the degree Newton scale is the grand daddy. It also gives you the heat at midday in the month of july as an even integer (6 °N) and "the greatest heat of a bath which one can endure for some time when the hand is dipped in and kept still" ( 17 °N). Very handy and intuitive.
Smackbox your obsession with pedantic notation is betrayed by your lack of understanding of the underlying units. For instance, only Fahrenheit and Celsius are measured in degrees. The others are just units without a degree note. The more you know.
It's funny that here in India, we measure atmospheric temperatures in Celsius but body temperatures in Fahrenheit. I've always wondered how that came to be.
@@VikashKumar-fr1db so as per your conclusion if i would use a thermometer that would display the temperature with 3 decimals it would instantly become the most powerfull thermometer in existence? No, the range is dependent on the make of thermometer you buy, so every type of thermometer has the range of the instrument used. Simple as that. If i buy a scientific thermometer capable of even detecting a change of microkelvin ( or microcelsius, same scale) i would be able to get a better precision then, the only difference i see on the surface is that an instrument calibrated to work on kelvin would be cheaper altough it would probably come woth integrated conversion.
Same in Bangladesh. Things are even more fucked up. We measure distance in Meter scale, but human height in inches/feet, also we calculate house surface area in Square feet. We use grams or KGs for weight of everything... but bakeries for some reason keeps using Pound (except in Dhaka). Legally everything is converted to International Standard but people keep using both in day to day life.
Fahrenheit's early thermometers used spirit wine and one degree of change was equal to 1/500th change in volume of the liquid used. When he switched to using mercury, multiplying the scale by four maintained a one degree change for 1/10000th change in the volume of the mercury. It wasn't an arbitrary decision.
If you made the cross-sectional area of the gauge four times larger then the scale would remain the same. Subsequently this does not seem like adequate motivation to be the driving force to change the scale. Just a thought.
3:55 - not true. Canadians use the Fahrenheit scale for cooking and our thermometers, in spite of our pretending to be better than Americans, quite regularly. Not exclusively of course but especially in cooking. We hardly ever state cooking temperatures in Celsius. We don’t like to admit it but we do. 🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦
Yes, ovens in Canada default to F but that's mainly because there are so many old and/or American recipes that it's just more practical. Aside from that niche scenario, I know of no other use of F in Canadian society.
@@inlineblue Where I live F also has a convenience factor as we never have to use negative numbers when talking about the weather since it never goes below zero. I imagine thats not true in Canada.
@@johncoolberg You have to remember the temperature things happen at for everything other then water in Celsius, so really it only saves you from remembering two numbers. And you still have to remember the numbers or remember that its based on water. Americans have a positive attitude. :p Though for most the U.S. they do have to use negative temperatures in Fahrenheit as well, I just live in the south. We don't get that cold here. Celsius is really useful in science since its tied into the other measurements. For day to day life it provides nothing of value over other systems.
This video had me question my sanity for the last hour and a half, since it made me come to the conclusion that water boils at 256 °F (it boils at 212°F) and i couldn't find where my reasoning was wrong (water boils at 60 degrees Rømer, so 64° in the original Fahrenheit scale, times 4 it should be 256° in the modern one). Apparently the video was wrong at 1:33 : in the Rømer scale body temperature is around 26.4 (21/40 x 36°C + 7.5), not 22.5. If it was then water would boil at 49 degrees, or would freeze at 1.5, so the progression from the Rømer scale to Fahrenheit is not the one decribed in the video, or is at least missing a step. I'm honestly surprised no one realized this in the almost 4 years this video was out, and i didn't even notice the first time i saw it.
I just saw this video for the first time and thought it would be a cool way of remembering the boiling of water but looked it up just to be sure. Upon finding it wasn't checked the comments for an explanation. I wish there was a better explanation of what happened.
The imperial system is a mistake. The international system is sooo much easier to use. Just look at the prefixes, for example. 1 kilometer = 1000 meters. 1 kilogram = 1000 grams. 1 centimeter = 0,01 meters.
***** I know it's easy for americans, of course. But america needs to stop teaching imperial and start teaching international. Or at least, something slower, like teaching both, then teaching the imperial with less effort, then after a while start teaching just the international system.
No it actually is easier, because you can relate any two given lengths or volumes or whatever without having to memorize how many inches are in a foot, feet in a yard, yards in a mile. The metric system is also infinitely scalable, you want an easier way of writing 1600000000 kilometers? That's just 1.6 petameters. you want to express 1/1000000000 meters? That's one nanometer. The system of prefixes is the same whether you're talking about volumes, lengths, degrees, joules, grams, etc. The Imperial system's smallest measurement of length is the thousandth of an inch, but that's borrowing from metric by dividing a root unit by multiples of ten.
Tons are used. 1 Ton = 1000 Kg = 1 Mg Mass is somewhat special because the official unit is the kilogram instead of the gram, so it includes a prefix. Although, in science you can skip prefixes altogether by using scientific notation, for example 45 MPa = 4.5*10^7 Pa
As a resident of the US, I say BRING ON THE METRIC SYSTEM!!! The sooner the better! When I was in grade school, decades ago (early-mid 80's), teachers were saying that by the time I was entering the work force, the US would be full-on metric compliant. yeah, right. like, thirty something years later, no go. we've a ridiculous hodge-podge of imperial and metric. gas in gallons,. soft drinks in litres, except for single serve 20 oz bottles. but, water is sold in .5 liter single serve, but gallons as the larger quantity! WT actual F! So stupid.
Not only that, but the U.S. gallon and fluid oz are different than imperial gallons and oz. Almost as bad as the mile, which is different on land and on water. Oh, and then with weight there's two types of ounces too. The regular one and the troy oz for gold and silver.
The only real reason the US still has the imperial system is because comfort of not needing to change. You get used to things, and then you won't let go of it. That's why I still hear british people use miles, yard, inches, whatever even though they already adopted the metric system. My problem when being confronted with the imperial system is that each messurement scales differently. The only thing I really learned is that about 80 degree Fahrenheit is considered warm and that the keys of a keyboard are 1x1 inch in diameter aswell as that one yard is basically one meter.
+The German Mason Actually, it's not just because of not wanting to change. It also has to do with how much it would cost to change everything over to metric...which would be a lot. And also needing to educate some 300 million people about a completely different system than what they're used to, which will be troublesome to accomplish. If we were a smaller country, it wouldn't be as much of a problem converting to metric, but that isn't the case. We're one of the largest and most populous countries in the world. Switching to metric wouldn't be a simple process for us.
@@thallan that depands on the humidity.. my parents were in sibiria 2 weeks ago and they did not freeze at -30C, but when i picked they up from the airport in munich they have frozen off the ass. It was +3C \(._. )/ Humidity, wind, friction.. Physics is broadly structured!
Fahrenheit edited the astronomer’s scale because he found fractions impractical and inconvenient. Now however, the only major country utilizing his scale is a country whose measurement system is based on fractions. How ironic.
@@jacobhall3186 Americans say "1/4 of an inch", we say "0.635 centimeters". Do you understand now? All of their mwasurements are based on fractions, whereas the metric system uses decimals.
Liam Fisher decimals and fractions are the same thing just written differently. I can just as easily say .25 or a quarter of an inch or 1/2 of a meter. You can write .635 as 635/1000 or 127/200. It’s just a different way of writing it. Numbers don’t change because they’re applied to a different system.
@@jacobhall3186 I guess you don't realize what is actually the convinience of decimal. It's just straightfoward. It's powers of 10. How many cm is 567,208 meters? 56,720,800cm. How many kilometers is that? 567.208km. I don't even have to calculate. How many milimeters are there in 21 meters? 21,000mm. So, let me ask you, how many feet are there in a mile? Btw, aren't there different types of mile? What is even up with that?
@@drnima Amercians learn both Celsius and Fahrenheit. Celsius is learned for scientific method and Fahrenheit is learned and used since it has suited well for over 200 years plus it is more precise than Celsius.
@@darrenhughes5576 it is more precise? What? The Kelvin scale literally is Celsius just - 273 degrees as it's absolut. You pretty much can't get more precise than that. There is a reason science uses Kelvin and Celsius. "science uses Celsius" yet u say Fahrenheit is more precise. Don't you contradict yourself?
I should invent a new language "WENGLISH". I'll just take normal english words, then add 4 letters to each one. Then, redefine each word to the opposite meanings. So if you want to tell someone to "NO, STOP" it will now look like "vcbjYES, zxqrSTART". I'm sure everyone will want to completely change to this new language right away
0:42 in 1701 polish borders were looking different and also this picture is wrong with actual borders of Poland, we don't have Kaliningrad Oblast, it belongs to Russia
Pole can't lie to pole- We all know that kaliningrad shouldn't belong to soviets- bealrus, lithuania, poland, ethiopia- but not russia*. And technically speaking it wasn't "Poland" but it was Polish-Lithuanian republic/commonwalth. Link to maps from period: pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plik:Grosser_Nordischer_Krieg_Phase1.png *IT IS A JOKE- ethiopia have same rigthts to kaliningrad as russia - NONE- EVEN GERMANS Have bigger rights to this part o f the world
I'm an American living abroad and I can deal quite easily with metric measurements... except temperature. My brain just really loves the Fahrenheit scale. Sure. I've learned some "milestone" temps over my time abroad, but I still translate them into Fahrenheit even though I deal with grams as grams, centimeters as centimeters and so on. It's weird.
here: 0= ice freezes, below 15=kinda cold, 20 =indoor temp, 30=ok, that´s enough now, 40= I´m dying.., 100=water boils. There. I fixed it. Now you can stop using retarded units of measure.
Unlike inches and miles, Fahrenheit is not quite as stupid, as neither Fahrenheit nor Celcius are based on anything absolute (freezing and boiling points of water vary with pressure). Kelvin is the way to go :P
As a Canadian in Physics 12, I have a question for American students: Do you always use Imperial units for physics? I would imagine it to be a daunting task to repeatedly have to use conversions for equations. For example, acceleration of 1 meter per second is equivalent to 1 Newton of force acting upon a 1 kilogram, the only numbers I have to remember are the acceleration due to gravity, the gravitational constant, Coulomb's constant, etc.
No, we use metric units for physics and other science classes. Most American students are familiar with the metric system, we just use imperial units in everyday life because it's what we were brought up with.
For physics, we use exclusively metric. Although engineering still uses Imperial sometimes, because that's what machining/manufacturing usually uses. A metric conversion error once led to the loss of a $125 million NASA spacecraft. Overall, I support the adoption of metric, but temperature is an exception because both systems are arbitrary from a physics perspective (since they don't line up with absolute zero) and Kelvin is clearly unsuitable for daily life.
I can use both units, I prefer metric in the lab and imperial in my day to day life as the unites are more natural. most imperial units are divisible by 2, 3, 4, and 6 while metric you have 2, 5, 10. you cannot equally divide a meter by 3, while a yard becomes a foot then a foot becomes 4 inches an inch becomes 4000 thou (not commonly used) but rulers have 16 intervals in an inch allowing for easier division. For cooking it is more complicated but making multiples or divisions of a recipes is easier without decimals. a U.S. gallon is 4 quarts, a quart is 2 pints, a pint is 2 cups, a cup is 16 table spoons, a table spoon is 3 teaspoons. then you get the ones everyone has heard about but has no idea what they are, like a dash, pinch or smidgen (yes they are real) The metric system is also harder to recreate. if i gave you a meter long rope and told you to divide it into the smallest equal units it would be almost impossible, you could fold it in half and show me where the 5 dm line then again for 250 cm was but you could not show me 1, 2, 3, or 4 dm along the rope. if i gave you a yard long rope you could fold it into thirds showing three feet, then one foot could be folded in half then half again and finally thirds and you could show my an individual inch. Temperature has similar constraints, with Celsius you could find boiling and freezing giving 0 and 100 you could divide that in half and show 50 then again for 25 but you could never show me 1, 5, or 10 degrees. With Fahrenheit set freezing at 32 and boiling at 212 for 180 degrees between, 180 goes to 90 then 30 then 10 then 5 while not 1 degree you would have 30 equal divisions to measure with instead of 4. In the lab you 100% correct metric is better but outside while more accurate is less useful. if you were a carpenter ordering wood by the 1m would be impractical as you could never decide in three or 6 equal parts so you would order 120cm or a similar multiple. Ordering a drink by the volume say 500ml instead of taking a pint (473.176ml) for simplicity sake. cooking meals which would call for all ingredients to be weighed out individually instead of scooped in a volumetric container. tl:dr both systems have there uses, no use fighting over it.
Metric is a great system for computer CPUs. Not so great for everyday use by average humans. That's why Fahrenheit is superior for usage by the general population. Computer programs and apps used by the general public can receive input in Imperial, compute the data in metric, and then output the response in the more convenient
In a sense. People used Fahrenheit because for quite some time it was the best scale (and tool) on offer. It's a perfectly good unit for measuring temperature, if inconvenient for scientific use (which needs to be both accurate and repeatable).
Well, the idea to have units related to each other (which is why SI is sooooo good for calculations) was first proposed a little before Fahrenheit did all this, and it had to come a long way to become what SI is now. I suppose easing calculations wasn't as important as having precise (and consistent) measurements, and so people just used the unit their thermometer came with.
I was with you until the end. The common temperature of the US ranges from 0 to 100 Fahrenheit, with anything negative or three digits being extreme. This makes a lot more sense than some random -17 to 38 Celsius range.
I like how you pick the Fahrenheit range to compare with Celsius, but depending on where you live, most temperatures fall into the -40C to +40C range, which has a nice symmetry to it, from very cold to very hot. And the sign change happens when rain changes to snow, puddles freeze, frost forms etc.
0 degree Celsius to 100 degree Celsius makes more sense than 32 Fahrenheit to 212 Fahrenheit... Don't even try argue this cos it's the same logic as what you said eh ¯\_ (ツ) _/¯ (used google to convert)
Veritasium -40 is common? I beg to differ. The only places that get those temperatures with any regularity are places with regular extreme temperatures... which is still extreme. Perhaps I could put it this way: the comfort range for Fahrenheit is much more intuitive than it is for Celsius. I truly doubt many people would call -40 anywhere near that.
Celsius: I’m the most used! And also intuitive! Fahrenheit: well I am the most accurate. Kelvin: all the scientists use me though Rankine: why do I exist?
Its kind of odd because everything above introductory science in grade school uses the metric system. I guess we Americans like to hold onto the past... BACK TO BACK WORLD WAR CHAMPS!! WHOO
The knowledge of people is not only gained by "graduating". There are so many more ways to learn. For example reading books. Fahrenheit might also have learned from his friend the astronomer.
0:43 Fahrenheit lived in Danzig (Gdansk) and later in Königsberg(Kaliningrad), which were both german cities back then. Danzig was part the state of Poland Lithuania during this time. He also was a german, as can be seen from his name. Fahren means to drive in german, and -heit means -ness like in Stupidness = Dummheit. So his name would be Driveness in english.
@@MMadesen But how do you define 'German'? In last 1000 years the city changed the 'owner' many times, a lot of things were happening there so it's not that simple and binary
+Joelle Jansen And most people don't use those formulas. Kelvin is not good for cooking, weather reports and those common applications that most people use. Celsius is better for that.
Kelvin is the real scientific scale, and is good because to convert it to celsius you have only to subtract 273,15 The Celsius is better in common life, because is simpler, but Kelvin is better in science because is more precise.
***** And that is precisely what I am trying to say. Thank you. I think Americans are suggesting kelvin because they can't face it that Fahrenheit is not good and Celsius is better, so they wanna propose something that is neither of those so they can say they were not wrong to keep this old scale for so long.
SI (Système International) units. Meter (length), liter (volume), gram (mass), Newton (weight), Kelvin/Celsius (temperature), second (time), and others.
+Be Cool or Be Cast Out! The seven base SI units are the ampere, candela, Kelvin, kilogram, meter, mole, and second. Every other one is defined in relation with these.
As a matter of fact, the music is from Incompetech. Check the description of the video for the links, and pay attention to all of Incompetech's music. You will most definitely stumble upon many known tunes. ;)
I’m an American living abroad and I don’t get what’s so hard about Celsius. Learned it in school, used it in chemistry class, most home thermometers had both scales and it was hard not to notice what the °C scale said. Now have a digital indoor/outdoor thermometer and it is in Celsius mode just because that way it matches my thermostats and I can tell others what the temperature in my neighborhood is and they know what I’m talking about.
I'm American and I hate our bizarre measuring systems. Miles? Gallons? Fahrenheit? Even hours seem idiotic! Jimmy Carter promised to get us all on the metric system in ten years. That was a mistake. We should have simply stopped using the old way right then and started changing road signs and school books all at once.
As an American, I think we should use metric except for temperature. 100=frickin 🔥 0=frickin ❄️ 1/3 up that scale water freezes 2/3 room temp It's perfect!
The story glosses over the most important reason Fahrenheit is still popular in places-the scale readings 0-100 easily describe the range of atmospheric conditions completely in a convenient 100 point space. Zero is damn cold and 100 is pretty damn hot, Celsius fails that miserably. Zero is cool (us midwesterners don’t really call that cold) and 17 nice and 35 hot??? Not easy. In science? I’m all about Celsius. Weather forecasts? Celsius sucks.
@@gwzipper1 Depends on the science you are doing. If I am doing stability studies, for example, plotting vs 1/K helps greatly. Thermodynamics, K again. A lot of other things we do, though, Celsius id better suited (general observations etc).
that's called a smear frame and it's made to help improve the perception of movement and mimic motion blur in low frame rate animation. when you animate without this kind of trick, the animation feels really artificial and stiff, with big stuttery "jumps" between each frame. this helps them blend together better.
Except that Windows is basically crap while Linux would be 1000x better if it could run games aswell as windows could. The only difference between Celsius and Kelvin is that 0°K is the absolute zero which allows you to do math with temperatures without messing everything up (the scale is the same though)
The German Mason When making the comparisons, i was mostly using stereotypes. Although the fact that windows runs games better makes it a better operating system for people who just use it to play games.
I do want to say that growing up in the United States and living there my entire life, the Fahrenheit scale is ingrained into my mind. Whenever someone says 20 degrees without giving the scale I think that's cold, but then get confused when they say that is a comfortable temperature. All other metric units (especially length), I can grasp how they exist without thinking about it. Someone tells me somethings a meter wide, I understand what they mean. Same thing if they tell me they have a litter of water or even a kilogram of metal. I can either picture those units or image their mass (or weight at Earth's gravity). But when It comes to temperature, no matter how hard I try I cannot intuitively grasp Celsius. I can only grasp the feel for 0 and 100 (+/-1) in Celsius and obviously -40 since they is where both scale meet, but all other points I cannot conceptualize. Given Temperature is the one thing we always experience 24/7 365 days a year and will regularly want to know the temperature, is may be the one type of measurement that simple education alone cannot teach the ability to conceptualize in ones mind, to understand its feel.
well unlike the other US measurements like feet etc, fahrenheit doesnt really have anything wrong with it so i wouldnt feel bad about not using celsius. i wanted to learn the fahrenheit scale so i just changed all my temperature apps to fahrenheit and when i went outside and checked the temperature i'd be able to make the connection between the feeling and the number on the fahrenheit scale. i fully changed them to fahrenheit (no celsius at all) because i dont really need to be told what it is in celsius since i can easily figure that out myself by going outside, maybe you can do the same, i'm getting pretty good at understanding the fahrenheit scale, at least for the temperatures i've experienced so far
You already got 100 and 0 right? now you just need memorize, 37 normal body temperature, 20 - 25 perfect weather, 15 - 20 nice, 10 - 15 chill, 5 - 10 cold, 0 - 5 freaking cold xD.
For me it's the other way round. I have a thermometer that shows both Celsius and Fahrenheit so each time I look at it I would see both - but I still can't make the connection between them. All I know is that at 80 Fahrenheit it's getting nice and comfortably warm. But everything else makes no sense.
It all comes down to mental conditioning. But I'd say Fahrenheit is a better scale for day to day use (ex. 60s is all a similar range, whereas 20s in Celsius is a much larger range). That and better precision without going into decimals. Where metric really takes the cake is in all other measurements, because of ease of conversions, ex. meters to kilometers vs feet to miles.
So, the temp of boiling water was originally set at 60.. then everything got multiplied by 4 - giving us the now used boiling point at 240 deg F. Thanks, Veritasium!
@@TheRoboticLlama Actually.....water can't get to 240 degrees, at least not at sea level pressure. It'll go to 212º and stick right there until it all boils away.
And he lived in Gdańsk. At the time in Gdańsk many germans were living. And Fahrenheit family was one of them. Fahrenheit doesnt even soud like Polish surname
Philipp Huf i know, and it doesnt change anything. Why tf Poland or Germany have to use Fahrenheit? Because he was born here? It doesnt work like that. We choose better scale, not by nationality of its creator.
the basic problem with getting people to switch to metric. "Ok, listen up, we've got a brand new temperature scale that you should start using!" "Why?" "Because it's better! calculations between units are easy, and its vastly superior for doing science! plus it's based on logic!" "That sounds nice. But I'm not a scientist." "Well you should do it anyway!" "So I should recondition myself to think about temperature in a new way, breaking off from a system that I understand and nearly everyone I interact with understands, in order to gain no practical benefit whatsoever." "Yes." the metric system is fantastic and does make a lot more sense mathematically, but people tend to be too busy not relearning how they measure everything because it's good for science. I think it would be good, strictly speaking, for the US to change to metric, but the benefits would be...nearly unnoticeable as near as I can tell, as most anyone who would benefit from using the metric system already understands it thoroughly and uses it.
Well Canada changed systems, it wasn't shoved down people throats. It was made slowly and gradually, using both system at first, and slowly taking the other one out while people are getting used to it.
I think there should be a strong initiative to learn metric but by no means should people be forced or pressured to outright switch, as that leads to the problems that have been discussed to death. More understanding is better, I think we can all agree on that.
The thing is with that, you are only talking about the benefits for the USA. The rest of the world hugely gains as well with less being spent on converting measures. (And long-term America will gain as well because the economy will save roughly 30-40 billion us dollars each year)
Fahrenheit makes sense from a human centric perspective and most people use temperature mostly to know how it will feel to them. 100f is hot but not death and 0f is cold but not death. But 0c is just kinda cold and 100c is death.
that's very helpfull I've always wondered what this scale was based on my personal favorite is the kelvim scale, because it makes sense for the measuring of no agitation of particles to be equals zero.
Yes, which is not that surprising. The Imperial system was designed based on common measurements a human might encounter, with the relationship between them worked out after the fact, while the Metric system was designed from the get-go to make calculating with numbers less bothersome. Undoubtedly, the Imperial system was more useful when humans primarily got up to trading grain at markets, but nowadays, with our modern world requiring measurements ranging from incredibly large to incredibly small numbers, and many interactions between different kinds of units, the Metric system makes a lot more sense.
I'm anti-celsius and pro meters. Fahrenheit is far far better for describing outdoor temperatures than celsius, because celsius is a much more condensed scale.
In this comments section: "I was born with [insert temperature system], therefore, it's the best one, and everyone who doesn't use it is somehow inferior to me!"
And what would that reason be? Because the ability to tell the physical state of water in a more simple manner helped their development? But that doesn't really make sense because the USA is one of the worlds super powers... So you don't seem to have a point.
Except I can give a rational argument as to why Fahrenheit is in fact better for day to day use! I can also give a rational argument as to how Kelvin is superior to Celsius in science thus making Kelvin and Fahrenheit the better specialized temperature scales with Celsius being a jack of all trades master of none scale. That viewpoint can be supported and I have already made 7 multi paragraph comments on this video explaining why and defending my position on the subject debunking assumptions as to me hating SI units. In fact I support all SI units except Celsius which may or may not even be considered an SI unit. Fahrenheit and Fractions keep that and use metric units for everything else! I even argued with Veritasium the creator of the video and made a comeback! Of course since the creator of the video denounced me nobody took the TIME TO EVEN CONSIDER THE SLIGHTEST CHANCE MY ARGUMENT HAD SOME REASONING BEHIND IT!
Why does celsius make more sense, its not based on anything even remotely accurately reproducible since even its water freeze/boil basis will almost never actually be accurate since it depends on the current atmospheric pressure that varies both by altitude as well as simply the weather. Kelvin makes more sense, as its based on absolute 0, but then it has the problem of its unit-widths being basd on celsius
sidraket neither is Farenheit. And? It is a practical guideline that is understood worldwide as it is based on effects observed everyday snywhere you go.
Jakub Świtalski It most certainly is. The unit width of fahrenheit is exactly one ten thousandth of a volume change of mercury. You do not see the effects of water freezing at 0c and boiling at 100c hardly anywhere since it changes based on atmospheric pressure, and water in nature usually is not pure and so the things in it will modify its freezing/boiling point anyway. Its an entierly absurd thing to base a temperature system around. So what we have with celsius is arbitrary 0 degrees and arbitrary unit width. With farenheit while 0 is also arbitrary, its unit width is based on an element and can be reproduced anywhere in the entire universe. So thats a step up. While a system based on absolute zero with a sensible unit-width would be even better, we dont have that since kelvin is infected by the celsius nonsense for its unit width.
sidraket Do you not understand the absurdity of measuring a *random* metal's thermal and calling it more intuitive than using the most abundant substance on the planet which yes, might not give precise and uniformly observed results when done with a boiling tube in the middle of field in Zambia, but can be estimated anywhere you go. Plus only like 0.5% of the human population uses Farenheit because it is so random.
DarkMatter311 unless of course they realise how, as a device for use by the masses, it is of poor design and is over complicated. A scale such a Celsius, with a logical reference that the masses can understand, or a scientifically accurate temperature measurement such as kelvin (which happens to have the same increments as Celsius), is far better suited to both mass temperature measurement and scientific use
For those of you saying that the metric system is easier to use, you are only half correct. It is easier to convert units. That is why it is used in scientific situatons in the US. Imperial units are just as easy to use in everyday life since I don't find myself converting units often. We understand the farenheit scale and I find it nice to not need decimals in everyday temperatures. There is no reason to have to convert miles into feet just like there is no reason to have to convert kilometers into meters. When you hear 11.5 kilometers do you convert that into meters before traveling or do you already have a rough estimate of the distance in your head? Feet and meters are equally as arbitrary as base units and both are useful for shorter distances. The same argument can be made for kilograms vs pounds.
Kelvin makes sense with absolute zero, but Celsius is just as arbitrary as Fahrenheit. Even if you accept water as a good standard to set measurements by, the freezing and boiling points change depending on conditions so you have to further define the pressure and assume the water is pure. If you agree that both Fahrenheit and Celsius are arbitrary with where they place their 0 or 100, the better scale is whichever one is more useful to you at the time. If you are a person thinking about going outside, having both 0 and 100 within the realm of possibility (and survivability) is more useful than not. Additional granularity within extremes defined by those conditions is also a plus.
@abigmonkeyforme congrats, you're teaching your students an absolute rubbish. The truth is, Fahrenheit works great for Americans, Celsius works great for the rest of the world. And Kelvins for science. With such a bias to the 0-100 range, would you measure distances in terms "0 miles is maximum close, 100 miles = maximum far"? It is absurd.
The whole KSP soundtrack is by Kevin MacLeod (Incompetec) who does royalty free music for everyone to use and sometimes other people happen to use the same tracks :) Although it feels weird to me too, since I always make the connection and just call it the "Kerbal Space Program Music" :D
SO I was raised in Canada were after years of being taught imperial measurements I was suddenly switched to metric. So ask me the temp in the winter and you are getting it in Celsius but in the summer it's likely in Fahrenheit.
Derek, you should know that even in places where Celsius is common, it's not the /only/ temperature scale used. The temperature scales which are used are those which are /most appropriate/ for the given application. eV (electron volts) - temperature scale (scaled by Boltzmann's constant) most appropriate for high energy physics, condensed matter physics, and most applications of statistical physics (where k_bT shows up) (room temperature is ~1/40 eV) K (kelvin) - temperature scale most appropriate for most sciences °C (celsius)- temperature scale most appropriate for applications involving liquid water, such as chemistry and cooking (as water is liquid between 0 °C and 100 °C) °F (fahrenheit)- temperature scale most appropriate for applications involving weather, as the majority of weather falls between 0 °F and 100 °F R (rankine)- not really appropriate for anything, because K does the same job and is more widely used It's true that we could develop a better temperature scale which would be more appropriate for describing weather related phenomena, but if we're working with what we already have, what should be done is for everyone to use the temperature scale most appropriate for the application being considered.
His point is that there should be a temperature scale that is globally consistent with the public. Celsius will do perfectly for this including weather. An eV is not a unit of temperature, but a unit of *energy*. A unit of energy is not a unit of temperature. Kelvin, while accurately representing the scale of what the concept of temperature really is (an absolute scale showing 0 degrees as the point at which kinetic energy in particles is also zero and there is no vibration) is used by a very small fraction of the population and is impractical for everyday use by the public. No one wants to go outside and hear that the temperature is 283 vs 293 degrees to show a "large" difference in temperature according to the temperatures the general public deals with.
There's a whole lot of not understanding /my/ point in your comment. First, I disagree that there "should" be a temperature scale that is globally consistent. Different temperature scales are more appropriate for different things. There is no reason to use one and only one temperature scale. It's not going to be so ridiculously confusing that we descend into chaos and the world grinds to a halt. Since there's no reason to use one and only one temperature scale, it's dumb to advocate doing that. Use the temperature scale most appropriate for the given circumstance. I didn't /say/ the an electron volt is a unit of temperature. I said that the eV /scale/ is a /scaled temperature scale/, where the scaling factor is Boltzmann's constant. If you take a temperature and multiply it by Boltzmann's constant, you get an energy. This makes using energy units an appropriate scale for measuring temperature. And I never said Kelvin was appropriate for weather! I don't know why you even bring it up. I'm not suggesting that we use it for weather. I'm suggesting that we use Fahrenheit for weather, and Celsius for cooking. Because we don't cook things at the temperature of weather, anyway, we don't ever need to convert between the two. You should know that water boils at 100 °C, and that that temperature is hot, but most of the time people don't need to know how hot 100 °C in terms of the weather because the weather never gets that hot. To sum up, we can use /more than one/ temperature scale. That's my whole point! There's /no reason/ to only use one temperature scale, so let's not do things that way!
Because weather is commonly 100 degrees C... Guys, fahrenheit is better for weather, which is NOT the reason celsius should be used. Ignoring this fact will cause people to ignore YOUR facts in response. Just fyi.
except I've never used fahrenheit in my life and so I don't see it at all in anyway being appropriate for weather. In fact, if you paid attention to the video, fahrenheit is actually more cientifically inclined, so to speak, than celsius, because of what a unit in farenheit corresponds to. For me, knowing that the freezing point is 0º tells me something important about the weather just by itself
Richard Smith did you even read what I said? also, where I live there's no way the temperature will ever go down to 0F, but it might go down to 0C. Also, 0C really cold, 40C really hot. It works easy as well, do you think you've made some kind of argument?
*0:42** This map is just so wrong* Not only did you use the *modern* map of Poland instead of the *17th century* one (which was very different) but also you got the modern map wrong! *Kaliningrad Oblast* is a part of Russia and in your video it's a part of Poland.
"so, maybe it's time for us to adopt global scale of temperature"
Kelvin: woo, yea
"Celsius"
Kelvin: I feel so shocked and betrayed right now
kelvin is actually the same as celsius. It just starts from absolute zero. One k equals to 1 celsius.
@@Martink9191 Nope 0°C = 273Kelvin
@@ujjwal2473 you are right, but that does not mean I am wrong either.
You don't get it, dont you?
@@ujjwal2473 actually 0 °C = 273.15 K
To be fair celsius is degree scale (every degree celsius is equally spaced, 0⁰C is the freezing point of water and isnt the bottom of the scale also negative temperatures don't indicate negative energy increments )
Kelvin in an absolute scale (every K is equally spaced same distance of celsius but 0 K means 0 and cant get colder in an appreciable sense, this also means 20 K is twice as hot as 10 K
pffft, we all know the true masterrace of temperature is Kelvin
absolutely right!
Bah, the °N scale deviced by Sir Isaac Newton introduces the use of freezing and boiling of water (used by Kelvin and Celsius) aswell as the temperature of the human body (Used by Fahrenheit) as reference points. So the degree Newton scale is the grand daddy. It also gives you the heat at midday in the month of july as an even integer (6 °N) and "the greatest heat of a bath which one can endure for some time when the hand is dipped in and kept still" ( 17 °N). Very handy and intuitive.
+Gain Medium F {™[!----!![[™(+(+!(((((##@(€(#!!!!!!!!+#=£™##£££££====™™™™!
Smackbox your obsession with pedantic notation is betrayed by your lack of understanding of the underlying units. For instance, only Fahrenheit and Celsius are measured in degrees. The others are just units without a degree note. The more you know.
Actually, the true masterrace is Joule.
The main reason we have Fahrenheit is so that we can go outside in 69 degree weather and say “Nice.”
I would like give a "like" to your comment, but you just got 69, so i refuse to destroy the perfection
Bruh you have 69 likes
edit: noooooooooooo somebody ruined it :(
"Nice."
@@neitomonoma4699 Adding my like to your comment instead.
@@abeke5523 😭😭 Yeah. But now, i can give him my like
3:17 if you pause at the right time Fahrenheit has 3 eyes
I saw that lol
No?
I paused at 4 eyes lolo
What the heck?
3 EYES OMG HELP ALIEN
“Maybe it’s time we adopted the global scale”
America: No, I don’t think I will
North America*
@@StewyGeoduck Canadians got it
@@Sakiayuo Canada FTW!
Add CGP Grey to that list. 😵
@@Sakiayuo Can still switch
So basically Fahrenheit exists because the creator was bored.
Okay...
So many inventions exist because someone was bored! Our creativity actually peaks when we are bored.
It exists because he made really high quality thermometers which happened to be in a scale he made up. Pushing his ideas through marketing, basically.
The video clearly explains that the fahrenheit scale exists because of the expansion rate of mercury. Do you have to watch the video again?
@@TboneI989 mercury also expands at a consistent rate per one Kelvin.
AMERICA
4:00 You can't throw away thermometers like this, mercury is bad for the environment. :(
Not Freddy Mercury
Roman Tom is that supposed to be a joke ?
lol no its not, its bad for living beeings
@@kippesolo8941 Living beings are in the environment...
@@Hexstream no not in every. so u can throw them away like that
It's funny that here in India, we measure atmospheric temperatures in Celsius but body temperatures in Fahrenheit. I've always wondered how that came to be.
Maybe because it is has wider range, hence more precision.
Same in Bangladesh
@@VikashKumar-fr1db so as per your conclusion if i would use a thermometer that would display the temperature with 3 decimals it would instantly become the most powerfull thermometer in existence? No, the range is dependent on the make of thermometer you buy, so every type of thermometer has the range of the instrument used. Simple as that. If i buy a scientific thermometer capable of even detecting a change of microkelvin ( or microcelsius, same scale) i would be able to get a better precision then, the only difference i see on the surface is that an instrument calibrated to work on kelvin would be cheaper altough it would probably come woth integrated conversion.
british colonialism, probably
Same in Bangladesh.
Things are even more fucked up. We measure distance in Meter scale, but human height in inches/feet, also we calculate house surface area in Square feet. We use grams or KGs for weight of everything... but bakeries for some reason keeps using Pound (except in Dhaka).
Legally everything is converted to International Standard but people keep using both in day to day life.
So you’re just gonna leave without telling me who invented Celsius?
There's a video about it
Veritasium has a video about it. That's why.
ua-cam.com/video/rjht4oAByCI/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/rjht4oAByCI/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/rjht4oAByCI/v-deo.html
Fahrenheit's early thermometers used spirit wine and one degree of change was equal to 1/500th change in volume of the liquid used. When he switched to using mercury, multiplying the scale by four maintained a one degree change for 1/10000th change in the volume of the mercury. It wasn't an arbitrary decision.
damn ur smart
He needs to see this comment
Bumpy bump
Maybe he sipped the mercury as he did the alcohol?
If you made the cross-sectional area of the gauge four times larger then the scale would remain the same. Subsequently this does not seem like adequate motivation to be the driving force to change the scale. Just a thought.
The best part of this collaboration is that i know perfectly the story of this temperature scale 😆
marcello ascani We!
marcello ascani omg Marcello che fa un video per Veritasium! :O
due dei miei canali preferiti!
come vi siete messi in contatto?
Ma i confini della polonia che ai tempi era mezzo continente piu' in fondo?
marcello ascani visited your channel to check out the vids u make... dint understand anything😂😂
Ma come hai fatto a finire qui...xD.
Stupendi i disegni comunque :)
3:55 - not true. Canadians use the Fahrenheit scale for cooking and our thermometers, in spite of our pretending to be better than Americans, quite regularly. Not exclusively of course but especially in cooking. We hardly ever state cooking temperatures in Celsius.
We don’t like to admit it but we do.
🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦
Yes, ovens in Canada default to F but that's mainly because there are so many old and/or American recipes that it's just more practical. Aside from that niche scenario, I know of no other use of F in Canadian society.
@@inlineblue Where I live F also has a convenience factor as we never have to use negative numbers when talking about the weather since it never goes below zero. I imagine thats not true in Canada.
@@johncoolberg You have to remember the temperature things happen at for everything other then water in Celsius, so really it only saves you from remembering two numbers. And you still have to remember the numbers or remember that its based on water.
Americans have a positive attitude. :p
Though for most the U.S. they do have to use negative temperatures in Fahrenheit as well, I just live in the south. We don't get that cold here.
Celsius is really useful in science since its tied into the other measurements. For day to day life it provides nothing of value over other systems.
Similar to how lots of brits use inches and feet
Fahrenheit: 2 digits to describe the difference between a comfortable room and a hot or cold room. Celsius: 3 digits and a period.
This video had me question my sanity for the last hour and a half, since it made me come to the conclusion that water boils at 256 °F (it boils at 212°F) and i couldn't find where my reasoning was wrong (water boils at 60 degrees Rømer, so 64° in the original Fahrenheit scale, times 4 it should be 256° in the modern one). Apparently the video was wrong at 1:33 : in the Rømer scale body temperature is around 26.4 (21/40 x 36°C + 7.5), not 22.5. If it was then water would boil at 49 degrees, or would freeze at 1.5, so the progression from the Rømer scale to Fahrenheit is not the one decribed in the video, or is at least missing a step.
I'm honestly surprised no one realized this in the almost 4 years this video was out, and i didn't even notice the first time i saw it.
Thank you! I watched this video 4 years ago but just came back to it cause it was still bugging me years later!
You’re awesome
In celsius you don’t have to do so many calcols, it’s simply 100°C
Fahrenheit does not change at regular increments.
I just saw this video for the first time and thought it would be a cool way of remembering the boiling of water but looked it up just to be sure. Upon finding it wasn't checked the comments for an explanation.
I wish there was a better explanation of what happened.
illustration and animation are phenomenal
Marcello Ascani and shits
gregkrazanski '+^°«
gregkrazanski
gregkrazanski
it was weird, Peoples don't write like that lepers.
The imperial system is a mistake. The international system is sooo much easier to use. Just look at the prefixes, for example. 1 kilometer = 1000 meters. 1 kilogram = 1000 grams. 1 centimeter = 0,01 meters.
***** I know it's easy for americans, of course. But america needs to stop teaching imperial and start teaching international. Or at least, something slower, like teaching both, then teaching the imperial with less effort, then after a while start teaching just the international system.
No it actually is easier, because you can relate any two given lengths or volumes or whatever without having to memorize how many inches are in a foot, feet in a yard, yards in a mile. The metric system is also infinitely scalable, you want an easier way of writing 1600000000 kilometers? That's just 1.6 petameters. you want to express 1/1000000000 meters? That's one nanometer. The system of prefixes is the same whether you're talking about volumes, lengths, degrees, joules, grams, etc. The Imperial system's smallest measurement of length is the thousandth of an inch, but that's borrowing from metric by dividing a root unit by multiples of ten.
Right, I remember the last time I needed to measure something in kilodegrees
No you don't, you never use prefixed larger than kilo with meter (or gram)
Tons are used. 1 Ton = 1000 Kg = 1 Mg
Mass is somewhat special because the official unit is the kilogram instead of the gram, so it includes a prefix. Although, in science you can skip prefixes altogether by using scientific notation, for example 45 MPa = 4.5*10^7 Pa
0:42 wrong Poland shape. This borders has been made after WW2
Naw, look closer, at the Kaliningrad Oblast. These borders are neither current nor historical.
As a resident of the US, I say BRING ON THE METRIC SYSTEM!!!
The sooner the better! When I was in grade school, decades ago (early-mid 80's), teachers were saying that by the time I was entering the work force, the US would be full-on metric compliant. yeah, right. like, thirty something years later, no go. we've a ridiculous hodge-podge of imperial and metric. gas in gallons,. soft drinks in litres, except for single serve 20 oz bottles. but, water is sold in .5 liter single serve, but gallons as the larger quantity! WT actual F! So stupid.
Not only that, but the U.S. gallon and fluid oz are different than imperial gallons and oz. Almost as bad as the mile, which is different on land and on water. Oh, and then with weight there's two types of ounces too. The regular one and the troy oz for gold and silver.
Thank you sir!
The only real reason the US still has the imperial system is because comfort of not needing to change. You get used to things, and then you won't let go of it. That's why I still hear british people use miles, yard, inches, whatever even though they already adopted the metric system.
My problem when being confronted with the imperial system is that each messurement scales differently.
The only thing I really learned is that about 80 degree Fahrenheit is considered warm and that the keys of a keyboard are 1x1 inch in diameter aswell as that one yard is basically one meter.
+The German Mason Actually, it's not just because of not wanting to change. It also has to do with how much it would cost to change everything over to metric...which would be a lot. And also needing to educate some 300 million people about a completely different system than what they're used to, which will be troublesome to accomplish. If we were a smaller country, it wouldn't be as much of a problem converting to metric, but that isn't the case. We're one of the largest and most populous countries in the world. Switching to metric wouldn't be a simple process for us.
donald trump will do
Fahrenheit is such a cool last name
How did the Egyptians measure temperature?
*THEY USED PHARAOHEIT*
WHAT'S A PHARAOHEIT?
About five feet ten.
Why.
I think your _pharaohmones_ are attracting all of these lame jokes.
Зонт Pharaoh nuff.
Poland was shaped differently that time, just saying 0:42
it is also shaped differently today
You can remember that Celsius didn't make it because it was originally named "centigrade".
I made the Hungarian subtitles. Im so proud of myself. It is so cool
took you long enough
I actually made it much earlier than the comment, it was just good recognising the words I wrote.
Cool! Thank you!
@@tvoy_droog the hungarian people only have is pride , so let him wrelish in it.
Lol
Fahrenheit should be abolished.
So should miles, inches, feet and all those weird arbirtary units
Celsius is no less weird and arbitrary. Non-absolute temperature measurements make no sense.
in fact the temperature scale in the SI is kelvin that is conveniently equal to celsius exept for the offset of 273.15
Nguyen Quan nobody cares edgelord
Celsius is based around water, innit? So, does that mean the kilogram and litre are also weird and arbitrary?
If you stop at the right frame he has 4 eyes 3:19
o monster Illuminati
How horrifying.
Its 3 with a little thing at the end of it.
It's a smear frame
3 eyes
"As an Australian Canadian,"
That explains a lot.
I am also Australian Canadian
Sorry, mate
@@Planetyyyy same
This does explain why he is intelligent.
@@microwavabletoothbrush Yes. Please explain what Celcius (with two Cs) is exactly?
so you've done the celsius video and now this, are you planning on finishing with a video on kelvin?
I wasn't... but now that you mention it.
:D
Drakan R good idea
don't forget Rankine!
Centigrade
0F: Cold --> 100F: Hot
0C: Cold --> 100C: Dead
0K: Dead --> 100K: Dead
basically, yeah.
That's pretty much it, Chief.
You are not dead when it's 100C, for example you get this temperature in a finnish sauna or a russian banja and you not die at all
@@edmiller1721 saunas are different. I don't remember how, but they are vastly different from our understanding of physics.
@@thallan that depands on the humidity.. my parents were in sibiria 2 weeks ago and they did not freeze at -30C, but when i picked they up from the airport in munich they have frozen off the ass. It was +3C \(._. )/ Humidity, wind, friction.. Physics is broadly structured!
Fahrenheit edited the astronomer’s scale because he found fractions impractical and inconvenient. Now however, the only major country utilizing his scale is a country whose measurement system is based on fractions. How ironic.
I’m confused isn’t every measurement system based on fractions? A centimeter is 1/100th of a meter same for liters and so on
@@jacobhall3186 Americans say "1/4 of an inch", we say "0.635 centimeters". Do you understand now? All of their mwasurements are based on fractions, whereas the metric system uses decimals.
Liam Fisher decimals and fractions are the same thing just written differently. I can just as easily say .25 or a quarter of an inch or 1/2 of a meter. You can write .635 as 635/1000 or 127/200. It’s just a different way of writing it. Numbers don’t change because they’re applied to a different system.
@@jacobhall3186 I guess you don't realize what is actually the convinience of decimal. It's just straightfoward. It's powers of 10.
How many cm is 567,208 meters? 56,720,800cm. How many kilometers is that? 567.208km. I don't even have to calculate. How many milimeters are there in 21 meters? 21,000mm.
So, let me ask you, how many feet are there in a mile? Btw, aren't there different types of mile? What is even up with that?
Léo Bitencourt no there’s only one type of mile which is 5280 feet.
Growing up in Sydney (as an Australian-Australian )in the 60's we actually had fahrenheit until we went metric in the 70's and converted to celsius.
It’s funny how you guys adapt to progress generally and Americans ABSOLUTELY FREAK OUT AT ANY SUGGESTION OF CHANGE
@@drnima if it ain't broken, don't fix it.
@@drnima Amercians learn both Celsius and Fahrenheit. Celsius is learned for scientific method and Fahrenheit is learned and used since it has suited well for over 200 years plus it is more precise than Celsius.
@@kuuryotwo5153 but... It kinda is broken as the rest of the world sighs when hearing about Fahrenheit... :/
@@darrenhughes5576 it is more precise? What? The Kelvin scale literally is Celsius just - 273 degrees as it's absolut. You pretty much can't get more precise than that. There is a reason science uses Kelvin and Celsius. "science uses Celsius" yet u say Fahrenheit is more precise. Don't you contradict yourself?
He just stole someguy's number and multiplied it by 4.
that's the EU for you... if there not trying to ban it, then they're trying to steal it.
Stole, adapted, and multiple by four
@@danielkerr4100 I wonder if Americans got it from somewhere... We should ask the biggest colonizer in history or it's victims like India.
He took someone elses measurment, rounded it off and _then_ multiplied it by 4... That's just sloppy :(
Fahrenheit needs to disappear IMO.
I should invent a new language "WENGLISH". I'll just take normal english words, then add 4 letters to each one. Then, redefine each word to the opposite meanings.
So if you want to tell someone to "NO, STOP" it will now look like "vcbjYES, zxqrSTART". I'm sure everyone will want to completely change to this new language right away
0:42 in 1701 polish borders were looking different and also this picture is wrong with actual borders of Poland, we don't have Kaliningrad Oblast, it belongs to Russia
Americans ignorants
The video was made by an australian...
Pole can't lie to pole- We all know that kaliningrad shouldn't belong to soviets- bealrus, lithuania, poland, ethiopia- but not russia*. And technically speaking it wasn't "Poland" but it was Polish-Lithuanian republic/commonwalth. Link to maps from period: pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plik:Grosser_Nordischer_Krieg_Phase1.png
*IT IS A JOKE- ethiopia have same rigthts to kaliningrad as russia - NONE- EVEN GERMANS Have bigger rights to this part o f the world
NO, no. He's not ours. He's a Canadian. Don't you blame us.
who is american?
Kelvin isn't 0K
ROFL XD
why did i read that as zero kelvin instead of OK?
Poor Kelvin
Collin Maybe because that’s what it was supposed to be
im calling the police
I'm an American living abroad and I can deal quite easily with metric measurements... except temperature. My brain just really loves the Fahrenheit scale. Sure. I've learned some "milestone" temps over my time abroad, but I still translate them into Fahrenheit even though I deal with grams as grams, centimeters as centimeters and so on. It's weird.
Love? You mean.. Used to?
@@lenOwOo Apologies for using humor. I lost my stick. Could you bend over so I can borrow yours?
here: 0= ice freezes, below 15=kinda cold, 20 =indoor temp, 30=ok, that´s enough now, 40= I´m dying.., 100=water boils. There. I fixed it. Now you can stop using retarded units of measure.
@@wtfucrazy 30 ok?? freaking hot. 23, 24 is "ok"
@@dhexdev7417 yeah that´s what I mean "that´s enough now". That is a hot summer day by the beach and I don´t want any more.
What is Fahrenheit? Useless.
Same goes for inches and miles.
Unlike inches and miles, Fahrenheit is not quite as stupid, as neither Fahrenheit nor Celcius are based on anything absolute (freezing and boiling points of water vary with pressure). Kelvin is the way to go :P
You realize that Celsius is just a 273 degree offset of Kelvin right?
Ever heard of decimeter?
Aaaaaahahahaha the American has never heard of a decimeter before
Aahahahhaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahaa
Scott uhm 2 inches = 5.2cm = 0.52dm = 0.052m
As a Canadian in Physics 12, I have a question for American students: Do you always use Imperial units for physics? I would imagine it to be a daunting task to repeatedly have to use conversions for equations. For example, acceleration of 1 meter per second is equivalent to 1 Newton of force acting upon a 1 kilogram, the only numbers I have to remember are the acceleration due to gravity, the gravitational constant, Coulomb's constant, etc.
No, we use metric units for physics and other science classes. Most American students are familiar with the metric system, we just use imperial units in everyday life because it's what we were brought up with.
For physics, we use exclusively metric. Although engineering still uses Imperial sometimes, because that's what machining/manufacturing usually uses. A metric conversion error once led to the loss of a $125 million NASA spacecraft. Overall, I support the adoption of metric, but temperature is an exception because both systems are arbitrary from a physics perspective (since they don't line up with absolute zero) and Kelvin is clearly unsuitable for daily life.
Agerr Gerra we used metric in science classes in America. it's not fundamentally different than any other system.
I can use both units, I prefer metric in the lab and imperial in my day to day life as the unites are more natural.
most imperial units are divisible by 2, 3, 4, and 6 while metric you have 2, 5, 10. you cannot equally divide a meter by 3, while a yard becomes a foot then a foot becomes 4 inches an inch becomes 4000 thou (not commonly used) but rulers have 16 intervals in an inch allowing for easier division.
For cooking it is more complicated but making multiples or divisions of a recipes is easier without decimals. a U.S. gallon is 4 quarts, a quart is 2 pints, a pint is 2 cups, a cup is 16 table spoons, a table spoon is 3 teaspoons. then you get the ones everyone has heard about but has no idea what they are, like a dash, pinch or smidgen (yes they are real)
The metric system is also harder to recreate. if i gave you a meter long rope and told you to divide it into the smallest equal units it would be almost impossible, you could fold it in half and show me where the 5 dm line then again for 250 cm was but you could not show me 1, 2, 3, or 4 dm along the rope. if i gave you a yard long rope you could fold it into thirds showing three feet, then one foot could be folded in half then half again and finally thirds and you could show my an individual inch. Temperature has similar constraints, with Celsius you could find boiling and freezing giving 0 and 100 you could divide that in half and show 50 then again for 25 but you could never show me 1, 5, or 10 degrees. With Fahrenheit set freezing at 32 and boiling at 212 for 180 degrees between, 180 goes to 90 then 30 then 10 then 5 while not 1 degree you would have 30 equal divisions to measure with instead of 4.
In the lab you 100% correct metric is better but outside while more accurate is less useful. if you were a carpenter ordering wood by the 1m would be impractical as you could never decide in three or 6 equal parts so you would order 120cm or a similar multiple. Ordering a drink by the volume say 500ml instead of taking a pint (473.176ml) for simplicity sake. cooking meals which would call for all ingredients to be weighed out individually instead of scooped in a volumetric container.
tl:dr both systems have there uses, no use fighting over it.
Metric is a great system for computer CPUs. Not so great for everyday use by average humans. That's why Fahrenheit is superior for usage by the general population. Computer programs and apps used by the general public can receive input in Imperial, compute the data in metric, and then output the response in the more convenient
So, basically, people used fahrenheit because it was a high quality tool rather than it being a good scale?
Yes. It was just that.
In a sense. People used Fahrenheit because for quite some time it was the best scale (and tool) on offer. It's a perfectly good unit for measuring temperature, if inconvenient for scientific use (which needs to be both accurate and repeatable).
StrunDoNhor
For me it dont make sense.
Well, the idea to have units related to each other (which is why SI is sooooo good for calculations) was first proposed a little before Fahrenheit did all this, and it had to come a long way to become what SI is now. I suppose easing calculations wasn't as important as having precise (and consistent) measurements, and so people just used the unit their thermometer came with.
No, it's better because it's better at describing the temperature.
0:42
@Veritasium
the uppermost part of Poland in the image doesn't belong to Poland!
It's called Kralovec and actually is an exclave of Czechia.
I was with you until the end. The common temperature of the US ranges from 0 to 100 Fahrenheit, with anything negative or three digits being extreme. This makes a lot more sense than some random -17 to 38 Celsius range.
I like how you pick the Fahrenheit range to compare with Celsius, but depending on where you live, most temperatures fall into the -40C to +40C range, which has a nice symmetry to it, from very cold to very hot. And the sign change happens when rain changes to snow, puddles freeze, frost forms etc.
There's nothing better with Fahreinheit than celcius... Same with your other systems yard, mile, meters,
Porglit That's just because you're used to it. Everyone else uses Celcius, and there is a reason for that.
0 degree Celsius to 100 degree Celsius makes more sense than 32 Fahrenheit to 212 Fahrenheit... Don't even try argue this cos it's the same logic as what you said eh ¯\_ (ツ) _/¯ (used google to convert)
Veritasium -40 is common? I beg to differ. The only places that get those temperatures with any regularity are places with regular extreme temperatures... which is still extreme.
Perhaps I could put it this way: the comfort range for Fahrenheit is much more intuitive than it is for Celsius. I truly doubt many people would call -40 anywhere near that.
Fahrenheit? more like freedom units
ServerDestroyers Indeed. Awkward, shitty freedom units. How many Fahrenheits in 1 TSA?
That was made in Europe
Hahahah, that sounded so idiotic that it made me lol. Oh gosh. Trump makes everything sound dumber.
I live in the US and in science we use the metric system. In fact we've learned both systems since like 1st grade
So good news for you - you can ditch one ;-)
Hell no.
I don't think that is the case everywhere. Is this a specific state or school that does it?
I live in Florida so possibly
Martinspire It is done everywhere as far as I know, they've done it in both Arizona and Texas.
Celsius: I’m the most used! And also intuitive!
Fahrenheit: well I am the most accurate.
Kelvin: all the scientists use me though
Rankine: why do I exist?
I use Newton
I proudly use Celsius. I'm in America
Tarek Midani damn son niiiice
You should be an inspiration to all your co-citizens.
Which country mate? I'm from Argentina!!
Its kind of odd because everything above introductory science in grade school uses the metric system. I guess we Americans like to hold onto the past... BACK TO BACK WORLD WAR CHAMPS!! WHOO
RentableWand america did relatively little in ww1 though.
Did Fahrenheit attend a University? How would he make a measuring instrument if he never *graduated?*
Master of puns
Get out
93
claps slowly
The knowledge of people is not only gained by "graduating". There are so many more ways to learn. For example reading books. Fahrenheit might also have learned from his friend the astronomer.
0:43 Fahrenheit lived in Danzig (Gdansk) and later in Königsberg(Kaliningrad), which were both german cities back then. Danzig was part the state of Poland Lithuania during this time. He also was a german, as can be seen from his name. Fahren means to drive in german, and -heit means -ness like in Stupidness = Dummheit. So his name would be Driveness in english.
Danzig was not German during the life time of Fahrenheit. It was autonomous within the polish kingdom. However many Germans were living there.
@Carl Kirchhoff Thank you for making this clear. But Königsberg was indeed german or prussian at that time.
or Fareness
@@gerbre1 You are partly right. It was a german city. But part of the polish-lithuanian state.
@@MMadesen But how do you define 'German'? In last 1000 years the city changed the 'owner' many times, a lot of things were happening there so it's not that simple and binary
Wow, i wasn't expecting seeing an animation made by Marcello in one of your videos, nice
Ok yeah but do you really Wana give up seeing that it's 69 degrees outside
well yeh, of course you would, why use a worse temperature scale just for a joke that only 12 year olds would find funny?
#Murrica!
Go live your boring miserable life
@@cheetobag2355 go back to 2016, or find an insult from this year.
Yes, specifically because this was the worst sentence I've ever read.
As a scientist the metric system and celsius makes so much more sense to me. Although a case could be made to switch to kelvin.
Celsius makes much more sense than kelvin for day to day use. We mostly deal with temperatures close to the freezing and boiling point of water.
olafurhh03 Most scientific formulas use kelvin. 😉
+Joelle Jansen And most people don't use those formulas. Kelvin is not good for cooking, weather reports and those common applications that most people use. Celsius is better for that.
Kelvin is the real scientific scale, and is good because to convert it to celsius you have only to subtract 273,15
The Celsius is better in common life, because is simpler, but Kelvin is better in science because is more precise.
***** And that is precisely what I am trying to say. Thank you. I think Americans are suggesting kelvin because they can't face it that Fahrenheit is not good and Celsius is better, so they wanna propose something that is neither of those so they can say they were not wrong to keep this old scale for so long.
Fahrenheit, Yards, Inches, Miles and Pounds. Why can't we have a universal coding?
Yeh True dat!
SI (Système International) units. Meter (length), liter (volume), gram (mass), Newton (weight), Kelvin/Celsius (temperature), second (time), and others.
Like what the rest of the world already has? :P
+Be Cool or Be Cast Out! The seven base SI units are the ampere, candela, Kelvin, kilogram, meter, mole, and second. Every other one is defined in relation with these.
Allan Song I was just giving some examples.
0:43 why is Kaliningrad Oblast showed as a part of Poland thats in Russia
Fun Fact: -40C = -40F
Also, +40C = +104F
Also 25C = 77F (just add the 2 and 5 together to get 7, easy to remember).
Qamar Munir nice trick :)
:
Stop learning tricks. Refuse to accept Fahrenheit exists and we will have the Celsius all over the world.
Lol such a disgusting scale
good job marcello! i love this animation
0:41 Kerbal Space Program!
It's Kerbal Space Program music!
wooooooooooooo
Soon as I heard it that's all I could hear. Veri switched to Kerbalese.
This video makes me want to blow up rockets
As a matter of fact, the music is from Incompetech. Check the description of the video for the links, and pay attention to all of Incompetech's music. You will most definitely stumble upon many known tunes. ;)
I’m an American living abroad and I don’t get what’s so hard about Celsius. Learned it in school, used it in chemistry class, most home thermometers had both scales and it was hard not to notice what the °C scale said. Now have a digital indoor/outdoor thermometer and it is in Celsius mode just because that way it matches my thermostats and I can tell others what the temperature in my neighborhood is and they know what I’m talking about.
I'm American and I hate our bizarre measuring systems. Miles? Gallons? Fahrenheit? Even hours seem idiotic!
Jimmy Carter promised to get us all on the metric system in ten years. That was a mistake. We should have simply stopped using the old way right then and started changing road signs and school books all at once.
unfortunately I don't think we have an alternative to hours
Hours are actually alright. They are in base-12 kinda like dozens.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metric_time
Dozens aren't alright :\
Nothing wrong with kiloseconds if you want something easy to work with.
Wow!
Marcello Ascani worked for Veritasium?
si!!!
Qayxsw he asked in english ( ._.)
answer in english
But I am Italian, don't worry XD
0:40 and that day he decided to fight crime, as MUSHROOM MAN!!!
As an American, I think we should use metric except for temperature.
100=frickin 🔥
0=frickin ❄️
1/3 up that scale water freezes
2/3 room temp
It's perfect!
I really enjoy animation as a tool to explain concepts. TED ED videos are among my favorites. Your partner did really well!
I'm American and I would love to adopt the metric system.
TRAITOR!!!
Ha no one is stopping you.
We use it a lot. Nothing stopping you.
Oh come on it encourages you to math
I had to learn both systems in engineering school. Made it a pain in the ass.
That 2018 map of Europe to show the travelling path of Fahrenheit in 1701 triggered me harder than it should have.
Which is interesting as the video is from 2016.
But yeah, it would be more interesting if it was a 1701 map.
The story glosses over the most important reason Fahrenheit is still popular in places-the scale readings 0-100 easily describe the range of atmospheric conditions completely in a convenient 100 point space. Zero is damn cold and 100 is pretty damn hot, Celsius fails that miserably. Zero is cool (us midwesterners don’t really call that cold) and 17 nice and 35 hot??? Not easy.
In science? I’m all about Celsius. Weather forecasts? Celsius sucks.
Celsius sucks for science - you want Kelvin, or Rankine.
@@gwzipper1 Depends on the science you are doing. If I am doing stability studies, for example, plotting vs 1/K helps greatly. Thermodynamics, K again. A lot of other things we do, though, Celsius id better suited (general observations etc).
@@MichaelDeninger kTB works best if you use Kelvin
0:44 ok I thought I left ksp running in the background
yes
Me too!
0:41 - showing 18th century Poland in contemporary borders is kind of inaccuracy. I believe it's unintentional.
I just noticed that at 3:19 Fahrenheit has 4 eyes when he turns his head
Why???
that's called a smear frame and it's made to help improve the perception of movement and mimic motion blur in low frame rate animation. when you animate without this kind of trick, the animation feels really artificial and stiff, with big stuttery "jumps" between each frame. this helps them blend together better.
@@GraveUypo It still bothers me knowing that he has too many eyes in those frames, but that is an excellent explanation! Thank you!
wow I had to put on 1/4 speed to notice. thanks @gaveUypo for the clarification
May it's time the world all adopted the Fahrenheit scale.
Temperatures are like operating systems. Fahrenheit is the Mac, Celsius is Windows, and Kelvin is Linux.
Except that Windows is basically crap while Linux would be 1000x better if it could run games aswell as windows could. The only difference between Celsius and Kelvin is that 0°K is the absolute zero which allows you to do math with temperatures without messing everything up (the scale is the same though)
The German Mason When making the comparisons, i was mostly using stereotypes. Although the fact that windows runs games better makes it a better operating system for people who just use it to play games.
What would Rankine be....Unix?
carultch I think UNIX is Linux based.
alexdiezg I thought it was the other way around.
0:41
*checks if KSP is open*
*it actually is open*
*but it's muted*
Someone: it's 100 degrees in Phoenix
Me: so I can boil water?
Someone: no it's 37.8 c
Me: ok thanks but it's still too hot
I mean I’d assume since Phoenix is an american city, that they meant Fahrenheit anyway.
@@annadoesroblox6205 That and the fact that it'd be impossible for Phoenix, or any settlement, for that matter, to be 100°C.
@@willch.2259 why are you guys killing the joke ?
@@billohsnap5418 Get over it, it was just an observation.
I think it's an angle that we need to turn to to feel the temperature
The animation was quite amazing 💕💕
I do want to say that growing up in the United States and living there my entire life, the Fahrenheit scale is ingrained into my mind. Whenever someone says 20 degrees without giving the scale I think that's cold, but then get confused when they say that is a comfortable temperature. All other metric units (especially length), I can grasp how they exist without thinking about it. Someone tells me somethings a meter wide, I understand what they mean. Same thing if they tell me they have a litter of water or even a kilogram of metal. I can either picture those units or image their mass (or weight at Earth's gravity). But when It comes to temperature, no matter how hard I try I cannot intuitively grasp Celsius. I can only grasp the feel for 0 and 100 (+/-1) in Celsius and obviously -40 since they is where both scale meet, but all other points I cannot conceptualize. Given Temperature is the one thing we always experience 24/7 365 days a year and will regularly want to know the temperature, is may be the one type of measurement that simple education alone cannot teach the ability to conceptualize in ones mind, to understand its feel.
well unlike the other US measurements like feet etc, fahrenheit doesnt really have anything wrong with it so i wouldnt feel bad about not using celsius. i wanted to learn the fahrenheit scale so i just changed all my temperature apps to fahrenheit and when i went outside and checked the temperature i'd be able to make the connection between the feeling and the number on the fahrenheit scale. i fully changed them to fahrenheit (no celsius at all) because i dont really need to be told what it is in celsius since i can easily figure that out myself by going outside, maybe you can do the same, i'm getting pretty good at understanding the fahrenheit scale, at least for the temperatures i've experienced so far
You already got 100 and 0 right? now you just need memorize, 37 normal body temperature, 20 - 25 perfect weather, 15 - 20 nice, 10 - 15 chill, 5 - 10 cold, 0 - 5 freaking cold xD.
For me it's the other way round. I have a thermometer that shows both Celsius and Fahrenheit so each time I look at it I would see both - but I still can't make the connection between them. All I know is that at 80 Fahrenheit it's getting nice and comfortably warm. But everything else makes no sense.
@@danielnoriega6655-30 cold, but not to bad with the right clothes -40 just stay inside.
It all comes down to mental conditioning. But I'd say Fahrenheit is a better scale for day to day use (ex. 60s is all a similar range, whereas 20s in Celsius is a much larger range). That and better precision without going into decimals. Where metric really takes the cake is in all other measurements, because of ease of conversions, ex. meters to kilometers vs feet to miles.
forget the scale, even typing the word Fahrenheit is hard. i always have to Google it just to make sure.
BattousaiHBr you just need to learn how to spell or use auto correct.
I just type F. Everyone knows what I mean.
BattousaiHBr zzy👟👟
DeadliestNin
All In Alt-Right
Kerbal Space Program hangar music, NICE!
No
So, the temp of boiling water was originally set at 60.. then everything got multiplied by 4 - giving us the now used boiling point at 240 deg F. Thanks, Veritasium!
Trololololol
Can confirm that water indeed boils when it's 240 degrees
@@TheRoboticLlama Actually.....water can't get to 240 degrees, at least not at sea level pressure. It'll go to 212º and stick right there until it all boils away.
well yeah, the video is wrong. see you noticed!
what? So Fahrenheit was discovered by someone from Poland, yet Poland uses Celsius. GG
RaikouX no, Fahrenheit is surname. Surnames cant be discovered.
And he lived in Gdańsk. At the time in Gdańsk many germans were living. And Fahrenheit family was one of them. Fahrenheit doesnt even soud like Polish surname
Igor Ordecha germany also uses Celsius so still GG
Philipp Huf i know, and it doesnt change anything. Why tf Poland or Germany have to use Fahrenheit? Because he was born here? It doesnt work like that. We choose better scale, not by nationality of its creator.
Philipp Huf i wrote that he was basically german only to make fact the fact
the basic problem with getting people to switch to metric.
"Ok, listen up, we've got a brand new temperature scale that you should start using!"
"Why?"
"Because it's better! calculations between units are easy, and its vastly superior for doing science! plus it's based on logic!"
"That sounds nice. But I'm not a scientist."
"Well you should do it anyway!"
"So I should recondition myself to think about temperature in a new way, breaking off from a system that I understand and nearly everyone I interact with understands, in order to gain no practical benefit whatsoever."
"Yes."
the metric system is fantastic and does make a lot more sense mathematically, but people tend to be too busy not relearning how they measure everything because it's good for science.
I think it would be good, strictly speaking, for the US to change to metric, but the benefits would be...nearly unnoticeable as near as I can tell, as most anyone who would benefit from using the metric system already understands it thoroughly and uses it.
Well Canada changed systems, it wasn't shoved down people throats. It was made slowly and gradually, using both system at first, and slowly taking the other one out while people are getting used to it.
They don't need to change, they just need to know both, like the UK, or Canada has to learn because the US won't use Celsius
I think there should be a strong initiative to learn metric but by no means should people be forced or pressured to outright switch, as that leads to the problems that have been discussed to death. More understanding is better, I think we can all agree on that.
So in essence it took more than 3 generation to shift ? How many generation are we now ?
The thing is with that, you are only talking about the benefits for the USA. The rest of the world hugely gains as well with less being spent on converting measures. (And long-term America will gain as well because the economy will save roughly 30-40 billion us dollars each year)
*200 degrees, that's why they call me MR. FARENHEIT*
I’m traveling at the speed of light!!
I wanna make a supersonic man out of you
don’t stop me now, I’m having such a good time
I love this little comment thread 😁
Just give me call... Don't stop me know...
Fahrenheit makes sense from a human centric perspective and most people use temperature mostly to know how it will feel to them. 100f is hot but not death and 0f is cold but not death. But 0c is just kinda cold and 100c is death.
i really like the animation style, and think it suits your channel well!
But using modern Poland when talking about history.......
that's very helpfull
I've always wondered what this scale was based on
my personal favorite is the kelvim scale, because it makes sense for the measuring of no agitation of particles to be equals zero.
If you "always" wondered, why did you not look it up years ago?
Absolute Zero rules 0K
yea when calculating things related to pv=nRT kalvin scale can be directly used
Because zero degrees Kelvin is such a useful metric lol
My favourite is this...
Fahrenheit: 0° = really cold, 100° = really hot.
Celsius: 0° = cold, 100° = dead.
Kelvin: 0° = dead, 100° = still dead.
It is not mentionned in the video, but I was told that a 100°F was the temperature of horse blood, slightly warmer than human
And tastier
Archibald Belanus Are you kidding me? Human blood is waaaay tastier
Loved the animations so much.
Im pro Celsius and pro Meter.
The Metric system is in my eyes more clean.
Yes, which is not that surprising. The Imperial system was designed based on common measurements a human might encounter, with the relationship between them worked out after the fact, while the Metric system was designed from the get-go to make calculating with numbers less bothersome. Undoubtedly, the Imperial system was more useful when humans primarily got up to trading grain at markets, but nowadays, with our modern world requiring measurements ranging from incredibly large to incredibly small numbers, and many interactions between different kinds of units, the Metric system makes a lot more sense.
COOLGAMETUBE I agree with you on the meter point
I'm anti-celsius and pro meters. Fahrenheit is far far better for describing outdoor temperatures than celsius, because celsius is a much more condensed scale.
Well, I'm Pro Celsius and Pro Metre.
Leggo My Ego you really wanna use Celsius for cooking trust me.
How about that Kerbal Space Program music at 0:45?
Wow, good ear!
Kevin Macleod's music
I actually had to stop the video to make sure I hadn't started anything by mistake or that there wasn't a 2nd video playing somewhere.
Michael Singleton
I was playing KSP and had this playing on my chromecast so it was a bit confusing for me.
In this comments section: "I was born with [insert temperature system], therefore, it's the best one, and everyone who doesn't use it is somehow inferior to me!"
And what would that reason be? Because the ability to tell the physical state of water in a more simple manner helped their development? But that doesn't really make sense because the USA is one of the worlds super powers... So you don't seem to have a point.
That's America in a nutshell.
Pedro Pacheco yeah they nailed it collectively.
Except I can give a rational argument as to why Fahrenheit is in fact better for day to day use! I can also give a rational argument as to how Kelvin is superior to Celsius in science thus making Kelvin and Fahrenheit the better specialized temperature scales with Celsius being a jack of all trades master of none scale. That viewpoint can be supported and I have already made 7 multi paragraph comments on this video explaining why and defending my position on the subject debunking assumptions as to me hating SI units. In fact I support all SI units except Celsius which may or may not even be considered an SI unit. Fahrenheit and Fractions keep that and use metric units for everything else! I even argued with Veritasium the creator of the video and made a comeback! Of course since the creator of the video denounced me nobody took the TIME TO EVEN CONSIDER THE SLIGHTEST CHANCE MY ARGUMENT HAD SOME REASONING BEHIND IT!
Blood Bath and Beyond I was born with the imperial system and it sucks.
fahrenheit: *exists*
everyone: laugh intensifies
I don't know why Fahrenheit even exists anymore, doesn't really make sense, Celsius makes more sense.
Why does celsius make more sense, its not based on anything even remotely accurately reproducible since even its water freeze/boil basis will almost never actually be accurate since it depends on the current atmospheric pressure that varies both by altitude as well as simply the weather.
Kelvin makes more sense, as its based on absolute 0, but then it has the problem of its unit-widths being basd on celsius
sidraket neither is Farenheit. And? It is a practical guideline that is understood worldwide as it is based on effects observed everyday snywhere you go.
Jakub Świtalski
It most certainly is. The unit width of fahrenheit is exactly one ten thousandth of a volume change of mercury. You do not see the effects of water freezing at 0c and boiling at 100c hardly anywhere since it changes based on atmospheric pressure, and water in nature usually is not pure and so the things in it will modify its freezing/boiling point anyway. Its an entierly absurd thing to base a temperature system around.
So what we have with celsius is arbitrary 0 degrees and arbitrary unit width. With farenheit while 0 is also arbitrary, its unit width is based on an element and can be reproduced anywhere in the entire universe. So thats a step up. While a system based on absolute zero with a sensible unit-width would be even better, we dont have that since kelvin is infected by the celsius nonsense for its unit width.
sidraket If you want 0c could start when atoms stop moving.
sidraket Do you not understand the absurdity of measuring a *random* metal's thermal and calling it more intuitive than using the most abundant substance on the planet which yes, might not give precise and uniformly observed results when done with a boiling tube in the middle of field in Zambia, but can be estimated anywhere you go. Plus only like 0.5% of the human population uses Farenheit because it is so random.
Woah, I hear that Kerbal music in the background
Kelvin and Celsius conversion : yeah dude. Just give or take 273
Fahrenheit : math goes vroom
subtract 32, divide by nine then multiply by 5 to go from farhenheit to celcius when above 0c
@@GraveUypo Cool but that's unnessesarily complicated
@chrisutubeism What he meant is to convert you take away 273 from the C and you get K, or you add 273 to K and you have C... Not "more or less"
Yes because that's something we need to do a lot in day to day life.
@@GraveUypo you can just multiply by 1.8 and add 32 going from C to F
Marsello Ascani, you did amazing job!
Only the smartest uses Radians to measure temperature.
DarkMatter311 or the stupidest
But are they pi radians?
DarkMatter311 unless of course they realise how, as a device for use by the masses, it is of poor design and is over complicated. A scale such a Celsius, with a logical reference that the masses can understand, or a scientifically accurate temperature measurement such as kelvin (which happens to have the same increments as Celsius), is far better suited to both mass temperature measurement and scientific use
Hahahahah
Kelvin is si unit
For those of you saying that the metric system is easier to use, you are only half correct. It is easier to convert units. That is why it is used in scientific situatons in the US. Imperial units are just as easy to use in everyday life since I don't find myself converting units often. We understand the farenheit scale and I find it nice to not need decimals in everyday temperatures. There is no reason to have to convert miles into feet just like there is no reason to have to convert kilometers into meters. When you hear 11.5 kilometers do you convert that into meters before traveling or do you already have a rough estimate of the distance in your head? Feet and meters are equally as arbitrary as base units and both are useful for shorter distances. The same argument can be made for kilograms vs pounds.
0:42 Poland didn't look like that back in 1701
Finally someone who knows and rememberd the history to mention that mistake.
Kelvin makes sense with absolute zero, but Celsius is just as arbitrary as Fahrenheit. Even if you accept water as a good standard to set measurements by, the freezing and boiling points change depending on conditions so you have to further define the pressure and assume the water is pure. If you agree that both Fahrenheit and Celsius are arbitrary with where they place their 0 or 100, the better scale is whichever one is more useful to you at the time. If you are a person thinking about going outside, having both 0 and 100 within the realm of possibility (and survivability) is more useful than not. Additional granularity within extremes defined by those conditions is also a plus.
There is also the Rankine scale which is the absolute scale using the Fahrenheit degree.
@abigmonkeyforme congrats, you're teaching your students an absolute rubbish. The truth is, Fahrenheit works great for Americans, Celsius works great for the rest of the world. And Kelvins for science. With such a bias to the 0-100 range, would you measure distances in terms "0 miles is maximum close, 100 miles = maximum far"? It is absurd.
WTF IS THAT THE KERBAL VAB MUSIC
THAT MUSIC IS SACRED HOW DARE YOU
Came down just to see if I was the first to notice. It sure sounds like it.
The whole KSP soundtrack is by Kevin MacLeod (Incompetec) who does royalty free music for everyone to use and sometimes other people happen to use the same tracks :) Although it feels weird to me too, since I always make the connection and just call it the "Kerbal Space Program Music" :D
I came to comments just to say this
I knew I knew it from somewhere!
Also, to convert from Fahrenheit to Calcius you need subtract 32 and multiply by (5/9)
Am I the only one who noticed the Kerbal space program music at 0:40 ??
SO I was raised in Canada were after years of being taught imperial measurements I was suddenly switched to metric. So ask me the temp in the winter and you are getting it in Celsius but in the summer it's likely in Fahrenheit.
Derek, you should know that even in places where Celsius is common, it's not the /only/ temperature scale used. The temperature scales which are used are those which are /most appropriate/ for the given application.
eV (electron volts) - temperature scale (scaled by Boltzmann's constant) most appropriate for high energy physics, condensed matter physics, and most applications of statistical physics (where k_bT shows up) (room temperature is ~1/40 eV)
K (kelvin) - temperature scale most appropriate for most sciences
°C (celsius)- temperature scale most appropriate for applications involving liquid water, such as chemistry and cooking (as water is liquid between 0 °C and 100 °C)
°F (fahrenheit)- temperature scale most appropriate for applications involving weather, as the majority of weather falls between 0 °F and 100 °F
R (rankine)- not really appropriate for anything, because K does the same job and is more widely used
It's true that we could develop a better temperature scale which would be more appropriate for describing weather related phenomena, but if we're working with what we already have, what should be done is for everyone to use the temperature scale most appropriate for the application being considered.
His point is that there should be a temperature scale that is globally consistent with the public. Celsius will do perfectly for this including weather.
An eV is not a unit of temperature, but a unit of *energy*. A unit of energy is not a unit of temperature.
Kelvin, while accurately representing the scale of what the concept of temperature really is (an absolute scale showing 0 degrees as the point at which kinetic energy in particles is also zero and there is no vibration) is used by a very small fraction of the population and is impractical for everyday use by the public. No one wants to go outside and hear that the temperature is 283 vs 293 degrees to show a "large" difference in temperature according to the temperatures the general public deals with.
There's a whole lot of not understanding /my/ point in your comment.
First, I disagree that there "should" be a temperature scale that is globally consistent. Different temperature scales are more appropriate for different things. There is no reason to use one and only one temperature scale. It's not going to be so ridiculously confusing that we descend into chaos and the world grinds to a halt. Since there's no reason to use one and only one temperature scale, it's dumb to advocate doing that. Use the temperature scale most appropriate for the given circumstance.
I didn't /say/ the an electron volt is a unit of temperature. I said that the eV /scale/ is a /scaled temperature scale/, where the scaling factor is Boltzmann's constant. If you take a temperature and multiply it by Boltzmann's constant, you get an energy. This makes using energy units an appropriate scale for measuring temperature.
And I never said Kelvin was appropriate for weather! I don't know why you even bring it up. I'm not suggesting that we use it for weather. I'm suggesting that we use Fahrenheit for weather, and Celsius for cooking. Because we don't cook things at the temperature of weather, anyway, we don't ever need to convert between the two. You should know that water boils at 100 °C, and that that temperature is hot, but most of the time people don't need to know how hot 100 °C in terms of the weather because the weather never gets that hot.
To sum up, we can use /more than one/ temperature scale. That's my whole point! There's /no reason/ to only use one temperature scale, so let's not do things that way!
Because weather is commonly 100 degrees C... Guys, fahrenheit is better for weather, which is NOT the reason celsius should be used. Ignoring this fact will cause people to ignore YOUR facts in response. Just fyi.
except I've never used fahrenheit in my life and so I don't see it at all in anyway being appropriate for weather. In fact, if you paid attention to the video, fahrenheit is actually more cientifically inclined, so to speak, than celsius, because of what a unit in farenheit corresponds to.
For me, knowing that the freezing point is 0º tells me something important about the weather just by itself
Richard Smith did you even read what I said? also, where I live there's no way the temperature will ever go down to 0F, but it might go down to 0C. Also, 0C really cold, 40C really hot. It works easy as well, do you think you've made some kind of argument?
*0:42** This map is just so wrong*
Not only did you use the *modern* map of Poland instead of the *17th century* one (which was very different) but also you got the modern map wrong! *Kaliningrad Oblast* is a part of Russia and in your video it's a part of Poland.
oh no big fuckin deal
No one cares!
I think Fahrenheit works better for meteorology. More granularity in common temps on earth. But I use Celsius for everything else.
Eh? In meteorology it's actually more practical to use Kelvin
3:20 Love the cameo Veritasium animation there.