Kaplan-Meier-Curve [Simply Explained]

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 37

  • @datatab
    @datatab  Рік тому

    If you like, please find our e-Book here: datatab.net/statistics-book 😎

  • @ChubiyojoAkoji
    @ChubiyojoAkoji Рік тому

    God bless you my sister for these wonderful videos.

  • @priyankar5611
    @priyankar5611 11 місяців тому

    I regret I didn't watch your videos this long.. And I never thought stat was this much easier

  • @mahfuzulhaquenayeem675
    @mahfuzulhaquenayeem675 6 місяців тому

    Yes, truly I enjoyed the video. Thanks a lot for sharing knowledge.

  • @arturleperoke3205
    @arturleperoke3205 Рік тому +3

    Maybe this helps in another way to understand "n":
    take the current value of "m" (probands who dropped out at exact that time) plus all below values of "m" (all those who did not drop out until then).
    Example: at time 7 we have 2x probands who dropped out and 4x probands who are still fine -> n = 6
    With censored data its very similar:
    at time 7 we have 2x probands who dropped out and 4x probands who are still fine AND 2x probands who were at that time or later censored -> n=8

  • @tsegawamare5452
    @tsegawamare5452 5 місяців тому +1

    Please make video on decomposition analysis for health equity.

  • @carlosmontiel2365
    @carlosmontiel2365 Рік тому

    This channel made me understand statistics thanks a lot :D

  • @ninakaplan6178
    @ninakaplan6178 7 місяців тому +1

    Thanks from Sweden Gothenburg from famaly kaplan

    • @datatab
      @datatab  7 місяців тому

      : ) Welcome! Thanks from Graz from famaly Jesussek

  • @mloik1
    @mloik1 7 місяців тому +1

    Thanks for the helpful video. One question: why does "0.6" appear twice on the ordinate? There are two 0.6 labels, whereas 0.5 is missing. This occurs on more than one video.

    • @datatab
      @datatab  7 місяців тому

      Oh many thanks for your feedback! Maybe I just copied it it it was wrong on the first one. Thanks and Regards Hannah

  • @shawnmok3476
    @shawnmok3476 2 роки тому +1

    Great Video. Very clear. Thank you!

    • @datatab
      @datatab  2 роки тому

      Glad it was helpful!

  • @ernestocruz325
    @ernestocruz325 2 роки тому +1

    Excellent video. Thank you very much.

    • @datatab
      @datatab  2 роки тому

      Thanks for your feedback!!!

  • @nocturneuh
    @nocturneuh 2 роки тому +1

    Thanks for this, great explanation

  • @kanwalzafar1710
    @kanwalzafar1710 2 місяці тому

    Best among all

  • @moghira1
    @moghira1 Рік тому

    May God bless you!!. Your videos and explaining are more than amazing. Actually they are beyound description.

  • @Flylikea
    @Flylikea Рік тому +1

    For the life of me I cannot find my copy of that book and I can't understand why! Anyway, it is really a good ref book and once again thanks for the video.

  • @anirbanmitra1753
    @anirbanmitra1753 Рік тому

    Very easily explained but I have a confusion. Please correct me if I am mistaken, but for Time = 3, q should be 1 and Time = 4 q should be 0?

  • @zhitian-wu
    @zhitian-wu 2 роки тому +3

    A minor mistake: 0.6 appear twice on y-axis, the one below should be 0.5...

  • @uhryliki5948
    @uhryliki5948 Рік тому +1

    Thank you for such a clear explanation! I understood everything exсept one thing. What is the mathematical meaning of multiplying the previous S(t) by the calculated one? We need to do it bc we have censored data, but how does it work?

  • @MaheshJethalia-xl8xk
    @MaheshJethalia-xl8xk 5 місяців тому

    In 7:45 the data entry of 9 is wrong and it should be 8 in Time column.

  • @muhummadkashif1633
    @muhummadkashif1633 2 роки тому +1

    i want to use Kaplan Meier in information technology field please suggest me any topic..

    • @datatab
      @datatab  2 роки тому

      Oh I am sorry, unfortunately I don't know anything about that!

  • @lakep7798
    @lakep7798 Рік тому +1

    Thank you so much!

  • @snehalbhartiya6724
    @snehalbhartiya6724 Рік тому +1

    Good stuff.

  • @alexanderdiederichs7332
    @alexanderdiederichs7332 2 роки тому +1

    Thanks!

    • @datatab
      @datatab  2 роки тому

      You are welcome : )

  • @tommy.h.descartes
    @tommy.h.descartes 2 роки тому

    Great video

    • @datatab
      @datatab  2 роки тому

      Many thanks! Regards Hannah

  • @augustinenayagam3840
    @augustinenayagam3840 Рік тому

    If it's measured so a guaranteed treatment in the trillion dollar medical industry, who can dare to stand against them for claim?
    Statutory should constitute a panel members where the discussion members shouldn't be shallow of policymakers.
    Thousands and thousands of statutory are in the darkest without claim for want of knowledge where field level operation should periodically monitored and reported and beneficials names should be published through interviews