Maybe this helps in another way to understand "n": take the current value of "m" (probands who dropped out at exact that time) plus all below values of "m" (all those who did not drop out until then). Example: at time 7 we have 2x probands who dropped out and 4x probands who are still fine -> n = 6 With censored data its very similar: at time 7 we have 2x probands who dropped out and 4x probands who are still fine AND 2x probands who were at that time or later censored -> n=8
For the life of me I cannot find my copy of that book and I can't understand why! Anyway, it is really a good ref book and once again thanks for the video.
Thanks for the helpful video. One question: why does "0.6" appear twice on the ordinate? There are two 0.6 labels, whereas 0.5 is missing. This occurs on more than one video.
Thank you for such a clear explanation! I understood everything exсept one thing. What is the mathematical meaning of multiplying the previous S(t) by the calculated one? We need to do it bc we have censored data, but how does it work?
If it's measured so a guaranteed treatment in the trillion dollar medical industry, who can dare to stand against them for claim? Statutory should constitute a panel members where the discussion members shouldn't be shallow of policymakers. Thousands and thousands of statutory are in the darkest without claim for want of knowledge where field level operation should periodically monitored and reported and beneficials names should be published through interviews
![Survival Analysis [Simply Explained]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Wo9RNcHM_bs/mqdefault.jpg)
![Survival Analysis [Simply Explained]](/img/tr.png)
![Log-Rank Test [Simply Explained]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FhUkDRzHdHE/mqdefault.jpg)
If you like, please find our e-Book here: datatab.net/statistics-book 😎
I regret I didn't watch your videos this long.. And I never thought stat was this much easier
God bless you my sister for these wonderful videos.
Yes, truly I enjoyed the video. Thanks a lot for sharing knowledge.
Please make video on decomposition analysis for health equity.
Maybe this helps in another way to understand "n":
take the current value of "m" (probands who dropped out at exact that time) plus all below values of "m" (all those who did not drop out until then).
Example: at time 7 we have 2x probands who dropped out and 4x probands who are still fine -> n = 6
With censored data its very similar:
at time 7 we have 2x probands who dropped out and 4x probands who are still fine AND 2x probands who were at that time or later censored -> n=8
Thanks from Sweden Gothenburg from famaly kaplan
: ) Welcome! Thanks from Graz from famaly Jesussek
For the life of me I cannot find my copy of that book and I can't understand why! Anyway, it is really a good ref book and once again thanks for the video.
This channel made me understand statistics thanks a lot :D
Thanks for the helpful video. One question: why does "0.6" appear twice on the ordinate? There are two 0.6 labels, whereas 0.5 is missing. This occurs on more than one video.
Oh many thanks for your feedback! Maybe I just copied it it it was wrong on the first one. Thanks and Regards Hannah
Excellent video. Thank you very much.
Thanks for your feedback!!!
Thanks for this, great explanation
Thanks!
Great Video. Very clear. Thank you!
Glad it was helpful!
Thank you so much!
Glad it helped!
May God bless you!!. Your videos and explaining are more than amazing. Actually they are beyound description.
Thanks!
You are welcome : )
Very easily explained but I have a confusion. Please correct me if I am mistaken, but for Time = 3, q should be 1 and Time = 4 q should be 0?
Thank you for such a clear explanation! I understood everything exсept one thing. What is the mathematical meaning of multiplying the previous S(t) by the calculated one? We need to do it bc we have censored data, but how does it work?
Same question 🙋
Good stuff.
Thanks!
A minor mistake: 0.6 appear twice on y-axis, the one below should be 0.5...
Oh thanks!
In 7:45 the data entry of 9 is wrong and it should be 8 in Time column.
Great video
Many thanks! Regards Hannah
i want to use Kaplan Meier in information technology field please suggest me any topic..
Oh I am sorry, unfortunately I don't know anything about that!
If it's measured so a guaranteed treatment in the trillion dollar medical industry, who can dare to stand against them for claim?
Statutory should constitute a panel members where the discussion members shouldn't be shallow of policymakers.
Thousands and thousands of statutory are in the darkest without claim for want of knowledge where field level operation should periodically monitored and reported and beneficials names should be published through interviews