Really enjoying these videos Ivan, no need to sell yourself short on the history front. You are doing a great service to history and material culture by reintroducing these guns, the shooting culture around them, and their technical evolution into the conversation!
The barrel and magazine are probably far enough from parallel that when it cycles it's putting torque laterally against the tube. The fact it's all concentrated into one edge of that ring just exacerbates it.
Well, I would probably agree with those gunsmiths, a Deluxe Winchester Model 11 is a very nice gun that has a hyper smooth action, compared to a somewhat clunky semiauto Winchester Model 40, it would probably be a nice trade. It is sad to see though, out of all the old shotguns I have ever used, the Winchester brand shotguns have always had the most beautiful finishes and insanely smooth actions. And comparing a modern Winchester SXP to a Model 12 is a joke, SXPs are like running a cement block across a rock pile, and a Model 11 is like putting soft butter on warm toast. Ivan are you going to do any videos on other classic shotguns after the A5 series? Like maybe Remington Model 10, Remington Model 31, Winchester Model 1897, Winchester Model 12, Ithaca Model 37, etc?
What's your discussion at 26 it sounds to me like the ring was just a little too narrow and it needed longer bearing surfaces to keep it from turning cockeyed and getting a cam lock. Something a quarter inch more material would have solved. You've got access to a lathe so you could probably make a product improved ring that would glide smoothly and not destroyer antique gun. If it works then there would be a small niche market for people who want to not destroy theirs
@@leviwoodring6101john designed it under fn in 1902, sold it to the chocolate French the following year. Then I think they either released or sold the data to remington, who "cloned" it. That's the part I'm not too sure on, whether it was just a patent release, or if it was sold outright. Either way, a5 was first.
"I call then nauto-5s. Because they're not auto-5s" Thanks for explaining that, I would've never put that together on my own.
Dang, Ivan's a rat but he's also a pretty groovy cat
Snagglepuss or Pink Panther? Cause im imagining Tom and Jerry.
@@stonehalo1632 I'm thinking like Cool Cat from the Cool Cat Cinematic Universe
@TheCaveRat now i cant unsee that lol
@@stonehalo1632 merry Christmas lmao
@TheCaveRat and have a happy new years
2:00
Well shit, what am I going to watch then?
Anime 😂
I enjoy this series. Thanks for sharing.
28:20 BLISHLOCK!
Oh no, it's finally a proven system!
Really enjoying these videos Ivan, no need to sell yourself short on the history front. You are doing a great service to history and material culture by reintroducing these guns, the shooting culture around them, and their technical evolution into the conversation!
The barrel and magazine are probably far enough from parallel that when it cycles it's putting torque laterally against the tube. The fact it's all concentrated into one edge of that ring just exacerbates it.
38:07 the SHHHLOOORP of that barrel
Nice shot of the shot
Well, I would probably agree with those gunsmiths, a Deluxe Winchester Model 11 is a very nice gun that has a hyper smooth action, compared to a somewhat clunky semiauto Winchester Model 40, it would probably be a nice trade.
It is sad to see though, out of all the old shotguns I have ever used, the Winchester brand shotguns have always had the most beautiful finishes and insanely smooth actions. And comparing a modern Winchester SXP to a Model 12 is a joke, SXPs are like running a cement block across a rock pile, and a Model 11 is like putting soft butter on warm toast.
Ivan are you going to do any videos on other classic shotguns after the A5 series? Like maybe Remington Model 10, Remington Model 31, Winchester Model 1897, Winchester Model 12, Ithaca Model 37, etc?
Enjoyable video
What's your discussion at 26 it sounds to me like the ring was just a little too narrow and it needed longer bearing surfaces to keep it from turning cockeyed and getting a cam lock. Something a quarter inch more material would have solved. You've got access to a lathe so you could probably make a product improved ring that would glide smoothly and not destroyer antique gun. If it works then there would be a small niche market for people who want to not destroy theirs
You might be able to get an expanding collet mandrel. That would allow you to get the magazine tube nearly perfect.
Dent raising tools exist for shotgun barrels, so I'd imagine the same thing could be used to fix a magazine tube which is much flimsier material.
@krockpotbroccoli65 they are expanding, collets and also, slightly tapered mandrells, what you use as an internal anvil.
Get a smith with a barrel dent raiser to fix the tube then slap an A5 ring in there and ill bet it'd work fine.
shot
Goon
Happy holidays rat pack
Oh my god!
You where also sopost to grease auto shotgun back in the day.
Remington 11 was before the a5 but whatever
It most certainly wasn't lmao
A5 debuted in 1902, while the 11 was released in 1905... (spongebob narrator) 3 years later.
@@stonehalo1632 browning sold the design to Remington first.
@@leviwoodring6101john designed it under fn in 1902, sold it to the chocolate French the following year. Then I think they either released or sold the data to remington, who "cloned" it. That's the part I'm not too sure on, whether it was just a patent release, or if it was sold outright. Either way, a5 was first.
shompgun
Very trad nwah
These are not shotguns, they will from now on be called schloop guns because the barrels go schloop