B.4 Marginal rate of technical substitution | Production - Microeconomics

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 40

  • @ehmonja
    @ehmonja 10 років тому +15

    The video says Economics made easy and thats exactly what you did.
    Thank you

  • @matti_martinez
    @matti_martinez 7 років тому +1

    I am from Germany and your video is really good!
    I didn't understand all the vokabulary buuut your video is still helpful:) thanks!

  • @b7r57
    @b7r57 2 роки тому

    Oh my gosh! Your voice stole my heart ❤️

  • @bqk95
    @bqk95 8 років тому +1

    I wish I had discovered this channel way before my final Econ exam... Great video, though!

  • @fysonelton9384
    @fysonelton9384 2 роки тому +1

    Well explained. thank you. I need more of these videos

  • @jhlj1001
    @jhlj1001 4 роки тому

    I found this very informative. Thx.

  • @ishamondal
    @ishamondal 9 років тому +2

    Thanks for sharing this video!

  • @diontaedaughtry974
    @diontaedaughtry974 4 роки тому

    Great explanation

  • @tinotendatamanikwa3620
    @tinotendatamanikwa3620 6 років тому

    hie ..if the mrts is less than1 what the situation should be like? thanx for the videos

  • @catherinefinley1241
    @catherinefinley1241 8 років тому +3

    Thanks for the amazing video!I had a doubt why does the MRTS diminish along the isoquant?Thanks.:)

  • @alicanozdemir2445
    @alicanozdemir2445 8 років тому +1

    Thanks for the videos !

  • @fulikras2928
    @fulikras2928 4 роки тому

    For the typical Cobb-Douglas function,
    q= AKαLβ
    whereas APL /APK =1 ,
    find out the marginal rate of technical substitution. Can someone help me with solution please?

  • @SteveJobs_
    @SteveJobs_ 4 роки тому

    Why L & K curve is convex? What's the factor that made the graph? That's the only important thing in this theory.

  • @liamdillon9465
    @liamdillon9465 3 роки тому

    Great video

  • @catherinefinley1241
    @catherinefinley1241 8 років тому +1

    Amazing!Thanks a bunch!:)

  • @hridaysheth7245
    @hridaysheth7245 4 роки тому +8

    Labor needs to be on the x-axis and capital on the y-axis though!

    • @maiden5427
      @maiden5427 4 роки тому

      Correct. I don't know what happened to her

    • @ElTimotoQIK
      @ElTimotoQIK 4 роки тому +1

      Not really. That would be the case if they were using dk/dl but they're using dl/dk instead.

    • @ElTimotoQIK
      @ElTimotoQIK 4 роки тому +1

      She already answered this in another comment 4 years ago

  • @siddhantkumar7864
    @siddhantkumar7864 8 років тому

    Why is MRTS different for horizontal and vertical lines of Perfect compliments ?

    • @Policonomics
      @Policonomics  8 років тому +2

      Dear +siddhant rajak ,
      The MRTS is different for each section of the isoquant is constant. A good example is workers (labour) and shovels (capital): if you only have one worker, you won't care about the amount of shovels you have after the first one, since there is no increase in output for having more shovels for just one worker. Therefore, in this example, the isoquant section for shovels will be the same from the first shovel, until infinity.
      We hope this answered your question!
      Thanks for watching,
      The Policonomics Team

  • @virtuousjoffrey8022
    @virtuousjoffrey8022 7 років тому

    Will the MRTS for perfect substitutes always have a line that is 45 degrees?

  • @bewa89
    @bewa89 10 років тому +1

    I think you swapped MRTS = infinite and MRTS = 0 at 2:03. Is that possible?

    • @Policonomics
      @Policonomics  10 років тому +2

      Hi Ben Ha Min,
      You are completely right! We'll change it right away, we apologize for the inconvenience.
      Thanks for watching!

    • @Policonomics
      @Policonomics  10 років тому +3

      Hi Ben Ha Min,
      We had to cut that part out, since the modification cannot be done without erasing the video. Indeed, at 1:56, the MRTS changes along the curve, and will tend to zero when diminishing the quantity of L and to infinite when diminishing the quantity of K. Anyway, thanks for the heads up!
      Thanks for watching!

  • @SHUBHAMGUPTAversion
    @SHUBHAMGUPTAversion 6 років тому

    great channel

  • @assil110
    @assil110 2 роки тому +3

    Small mistake: MRTS= dL/dk = - MPK/MPL
    Because MKL and MPL are positive and dL/dk is the slope of the isoquant which is negative

  • @ciarancoughlan3785
    @ciarancoughlan3785 9 років тому +1

    Is the MRTS not MPL/MPK?

    • @Policonomics
      @Policonomics  9 років тому +2

      Dear ciaran coughlan ,
      It really depends on how you design the graph. Here, since K is in the X-axis, MRTS=MPK/MPL. This is because MPK=dQ/dK, and MPL=dQ/dL, and therefore dL/dK=MPK/MPL.
      Thanks for watching!

  • @warewolfenizer
    @warewolfenizer 10 років тому

    what happens when you have MPl/MPk?

    • @Policonomics
      @Policonomics  10 років тому

      Hi warewolfenizer
      The analysis uses MPl/MPk when the axis are inverted (ie, labor on the x-axis and capital on the y-axis). The analysis is done in the same way. Just try to remember to change labor and capital in every step of the process.
      Thanks for watching!

  • @roundersproduction
    @roundersproduction 4 роки тому

    Great 👍

  • @AyushRaj-rx1su
    @AyushRaj-rx1su 6 років тому +1

    Very vas.,.grdeweg

  • @user-ko4rr9ps6p
    @user-ko4rr9ps6p 5 років тому

    Понял

  • @victormendezrobles
    @victormendezrobles Рік тому

    even a graph makes me think of her :(

    • @victormendezrobles
      @victormendezrobles Рік тому

      her marginal rate of technical substitution had my isoquant at 0