Basic leveraged buyout (LBO) | Stocks and bonds | Finance & Capital Markets | Khan Academy

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @Fashionarily
    @Fashionarily 8 років тому +225

    Wow! You know everything! Lol Im pretty sure you are the one who taught me Photosynthesis and Cellular Respiration years ago when I was in college. Now I land on this topic years later and you are teaching me this! Amazing! 😂😂

    • @cclar777
      @cclar777 2 роки тому +3

      Lmao, he taught me calculus back in 2018!!!

  • @khanacademy
    @khanacademy  13 років тому +61

    @Frostpako Actually most corporate debt is interest only and you pay most or all the principal at once (usually taking out a new loan to pay the principal on the old one). Also, principal payments do not get accounted for on your income statement.

  • @fpxdaxbe
    @fpxdaxbe 12 років тому +8

    I have thoroughly enjoyed reading your comments, sir. As an 18 year old (accounting) college student trying to make sense of everything financial, I would love to have a smart, good-American advisor like you. Many thanks!

    • @rewardx
      @rewardx 2 роки тому +4

      You're 28 now. I hope life is going good for you.

  • @thosantos88
    @thosantos88 11 років тому +18

    Thank you for this very simple explanation!

  • @lifecrackaca2022
    @lifecrackaca2022 Рік тому +1

    This guy teaches just everything. Wow. Great job.

  • @LamarFrancis
    @LamarFrancis 8 років тому +4

    Thanks for making it so simple. Wasn't boring. Had colors to coordinate. Great.

  • @klothus9960
    @klothus9960 2 роки тому +1

    thats a really good video, even eleven years latter it can return me some knowledge for me

  • @JP1234815
    @JP1234815 3 роки тому +1

    The great thing about it being an LBO is if the business increases it's net income year on year - that will be magnified by leverage!!

  • @cyrilsurendar738
    @cyrilsurendar738 3 роки тому +3

    Well explained, so simple and concise. Thank you !!

  • @dzidzaichidumba5435
    @dzidzaichidumba5435 3 роки тому +6

    This is how Manchester United F.C was bought, very intresting

    • @m.a6141
      @m.a6141 3 роки тому +2

      CAME TO HERE ALSO FOR THAT

    • @AbbasAdejonwo
      @AbbasAdejonwo 3 роки тому +1

      Literally just watched a video on how the Glazers bought MUFC and came here to understand the deal structure more😂

    • @philiphan6673
      @philiphan6673 3 роки тому +1

      Exactly what brought me here as well lol

  • @rahul27668
    @rahul27668 5 років тому +1

    Thanks....I was so confused reading this from cfa books...this made LBO Cristal clear

  • @azzz3709
    @azzz3709 2 роки тому +1

    Great video. Explains the structure clearly and simply.

  • @MatthieuVlogs
    @MatthieuVlogs 6 років тому +11

    Wow, what a beautiful and concise explanation. It's great to see how LBOs can be so attractive; it's also interesting to note how they can go awry for the purchased company when the income isn't as consistent as previously thought (Toys-R-Us). Thanks for sharing!

  • @marcelolopes5684
    @marcelolopes5684 3 роки тому +4

    Hi, shouldn't we consider the payment structure on this loan? If we consider a 10 year loan, cash flow cushion is negative since the first year. I understand the minimal payment term which would allow such structure is 25 years, isn't it?

  • @Jack7967
    @Jack7967 11 років тому +2

    Hmm. OK. That makes sense.(I think; I was a science major so I had to look up most of that) I can see why sal dumbed it down a lot as an introduction video.

  • @rohitxess1955
    @rohitxess1955 6 місяців тому

    Wow, this is the easiest explanation out there.

  • @KazenoniKakuremi
    @KazenoniKakuremi 12 років тому

    Yes you are right, the problem is when you goto 100% debt, the interest payment wont be the same, as the bank now is taking more risk, because there is no 1M equity buffer to cushion losses

  • @ramonandre2969
    @ramonandre2969 8 років тому +6

    THE KEY TO ALL THIS IS PICKING COMPANIES WITH GREAT ASSETS AND GENERATES INCOME..THAT WILL ABLE A SWING LOAN..

  • @Andrewcoulibaly
    @Andrewcoulibaly 2 роки тому +1

    My big question is it true that firms need to disclose financial information to their lender before being approved for leverage for their buyout? Does that disclosure effect their interest rate or how much money is lended for the buyout?

  • @DataBeach
    @DataBeach 4 місяці тому

    Thanks for this clear explanation of LBO. I don't quite think the deal is a good one for you even at 40% RoI in year 1. Your debt to the bank is not just 10% interest but interest + $9m borrowed principal. It would be nice to see future cash flow of the business showing how the $9m gets repaid without hurting the yearly net income of the business.

  • @dimitriskourti2634
    @dimitriskourti2634 2 роки тому +4

    Generally, good basic explanation. Although some things are left out. How you conclude that is a good business deal, if you are left with 400k income and you still have to pay the principal? In how many years you will repay the debt if you assume that you only pay the interest of the loan? But the basic explanation of LBO is ok.

    • @Skulluuzz
      @Skulluuzz 2 роки тому

      I think this is a VERY important question

  • @clay9984
    @clay9984 3 роки тому

    Great explanation

  • @BushwickSounds
    @BushwickSounds 2 роки тому

    Wow those final 10 seconds blew my mind lol

  • @pattipilot
    @pattipilot 8 років тому +1

    Thank you for sharing this. I really appreciate your videos. Keep up the great work!!

  • @jonveals33
    @jonveals33 5 років тому

    This is a great simple explanation.

  • @as3sfv99ew9
    @as3sfv99ew9 13 років тому

    this was pretty helpful - thanks bro, you did it again!

  • @abdulmuhaimin5861
    @abdulmuhaimin5861 3 роки тому

    wow..well explained ..thank u

  • @thekraken1000
    @thekraken1000 13 років тому

    American Hero Right here

  • @M4rtingale
    @M4rtingale 13 років тому

    @Frostpako The terms of the loan can be negotiated and the size of the installments varies from business case to business case. You cannot conclude based on the video whether or not the installments are larger than the net income.

  • @financekid3163
    @financekid3163 7 років тому +1

    Excellent introductory video, for anymore looking to learn more about the LBO transaction and how different parties are involved in the transaction, check out the LBO video on my channel. Let me know if you have any questions!

  • @Lehmann108
    @Lehmann108 12 років тому

    That is exactly what happens! All assets including pension funds are open to the creditors.

  • @KoalaBearWarrior
    @KoalaBearWarrior 13 років тому

    Man these are so great! Keep on posting these vids!!!!

  • @NotMyWillButThineBeDone
    @NotMyWillButThineBeDone 6 років тому +1

    Makes so much sense. Thank you!

  • @honggwan.
    @honggwan. 2 роки тому

    Thank you for the video! It was easy to understand.

  • @tteu123
    @tteu123 10 років тому +1

    This. This is awesome.

  • @nikkiklijn2722
    @nikkiklijn2722 Рік тому

    thanks that makes sense now!

  • @ncochran01
    @ncochran01 3 роки тому +1

    This is pretty interesting, but the problem is if that business starts to decline, the debt/interest becomes a problem right? It seems like we hear about these big deals (purchase of a large chain from equity) and 5 years later the file for bankruptcy. What is the major downfall of the LBO?

  • @gauravtejwani2798
    @gauravtejwani2798 2 роки тому

    Amazing 🔥

  • @KazenoniKakuremi
    @KazenoniKakuremi 12 років тому +1

    I am not sure but I think the return may be even higher, as you will need to add back the tax shield you received from the interest payment...someone correct me if I am wrong

  • @kevinesteves5530
    @kevinesteves5530 11 років тому

    so.. You a a partner in a private equity fund and you are looking at a BASIC leveraged buyout video.. Must be a very good partnership..

  • @owenconnelly5975
    @owenconnelly5975 Рік тому

    Very well done

  • @luiohh
    @luiohh 11 років тому +1

    I've always wondered - why it is the target company which is saddled with the debt used to fund the acquisition, and not the purchaser company itself? Shouldn't it be the purchaser who borrows from the bank and adds in some of the purchaser's own money to buy over the target?

    • @CAVaidShukla
      @CAVaidShukla 2 роки тому

      It same thing I was thinking throughout the whole video. How it's the debt of the target company when debt is taken by acquiring company.

    • @dimitriskourti2634
      @dimitriskourti2634 2 роки тому

      @@CAVaidShukla Probably because it is in the definition of LBOs, the target company is used as collateral, under mortgage. The investment itself is the collateral, so it is one evaluated for the loan. The loan is restricted to the target company, limited liability loan(somehow), if something goes wrong, the damages are restricted to the investment only.

  • @Vattic2
    @Vattic2 12 років тому

    Hey! im not good speaking english but your video was useful whatever! :) thx!

  • @tushya2088
    @tushya2088 2 роки тому +1

    What about the principal to be paid to the bank? That is also an expense to me and shouldn’t it be decreased from the income?

    • @Nanamahjiyc
      @Nanamahjiyc Рік тому

      The principal would be the $9MM you borrowed. Principal repayment does not affect net income.

  • @arghonandi6818
    @arghonandi6818 3 роки тому

    great video!

  • @jenniferhall-d5r
    @jenniferhall-d5r Місяць тому

    Appreciate the breakdown! Just a question on a different topic: I have the OKX Wallet with USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (job priority warm lab border boil monkey manage palace fiber weird ask). How do I go about transferring them to Binance?

  • @KazenoniKakuremi
    @KazenoniKakuremi 12 років тому

    yea, you are absolutely right, its the same as 'margin lending' where you borrow a lot of money to trade with, so none of your own equity, but the interest payments are high...if you can find a return that is far greater than those payments, then you can definitely go for a 100% debt financed model

    • @andrecamacho7660
      @andrecamacho7660 Рік тому

      who will finance a 100% your deal ? ... unless you are a known business man.. forget it

  • @tarekalsherif57
    @tarekalsherif57 3 роки тому

    Awesome! Thank you,

  • @rjstn9
    @rjstn9 4 роки тому

    great video, very clear thank you

  • @sabreenabdullajirrow7566
    @sabreenabdullajirrow7566 5 років тому

    This was amazing thank you

  • @sumitagarwal3788
    @sumitagarwal3788 3 роки тому

    What about the calculating the fee or cost of management fee of target

  • @M4rtingale
    @M4rtingale 13 років тому

    @TheHumanAgenda (cont'd)
    2) A 40% return is better than a 10% return. If you are unable to see this, not even Sal can help you understand. If 10 people lever up their investments, they get a total return among them of 4m, compared to 1m if they did not lever up. Everybody wins!

  • @ups427
    @ups427 11 років тому

    I mean i wish we could get just interest only stuff, but banks don't allow that. in theory you could do a deal with all mezzanine rates, but they are 12-15% + warrants so about 20% per year. Thats way to high. Senior debt right now is 4-6*%, so its a drastic difference in cost of capital.

  • @pratikthakur3562
    @pratikthakur3562 Рік тому

    How would they return principal amount?

  • @pornpimolwongsiri4672
    @pornpimolwongsiri4672 5 років тому

    Thank you so much!

  • @MrCrowbarFace
    @MrCrowbarFace 13 років тому

    wow thanks very informative!

  • @Jack7967
    @Jack7967 11 років тому

    So, for this example, what kind of principal payment do you think we'd be looking at? I can't imagine it being high enough not to make it worth it because you are receiving an annual income. You'd get back the $1 Mil in a couple of years and from there on would be making money right?

  • @brucelee2780
    @brucelee2780 9 років тому

    Amazing! Thank you so much!

  • @clayandrews4905
    @clayandrews4905 7 років тому

    The $400k is not the ROI. It's the firms new net income. So yes there is a 40% return if you are comparing net income over investment, however the investor will only claim a portion of that income if they are interested in growing the firm or refinancing, it may be possible to reach a 40% return after several years if the loan is refinanced and structured to maximize investor earnings potential.

    • @xWhiteRice
      @xWhiteRice 7 років тому +2

      This may be 6 months old but I disagree. as a 0 growth firm, all of that net income would theoretically be pushed out as dividends. And as the sole owner, congratulations on your 400k annual payday.

  • @SabrinAlzahrani
    @SabrinAlzahrani 3 роки тому +1

    why do we pay the whole interest rate in year 1, also what about the principle payback?

    • @andrecamacho7660
      @andrecamacho7660 Рік тому

      10% every year .... not 10% of total period of loan

  • @sumitagarwal3788
    @sumitagarwal3788 3 роки тому

    Excellent explanation. 400000 return on 1 million being called not so sleepy return

  • @gkollias14
    @gkollias14 5 років тому

    what are the total taxes paid before the buyout and after the buyout?

  • @melynimason4216
    @melynimason4216 8 років тому

    Excellent.

  • @M4rtingale
    @M4rtingale 13 років тому

    @TheHumanAgenda (con'td)
    1.2) The company or investor DO have the available funds, but are unwilling to lock p the money in a single project. As a result, the rest of the money is freed up for other investments or furthering the one already in business.
    (con't)

  • @Amira6262
    @Amira6262 13 років тому

    Thanks, Khan:)

  • @richabazgain5847
    @richabazgain5847 6 років тому

    The best explanation (y)

  • @28gbb
    @28gbb 13 років тому

    good explanation but no bank would give you 90% leverage, maybe 50% if you are lucky on a small private company - if it has hard assets.

  • @addydaddy1100
    @addydaddy1100 12 років тому +2

    ok... even still if I raised my debt... still I they will leave atleast something to me... the point I am making is none of my equity I have invested.. but I still earn a profit...

  • @ntcuong01ct1
    @ntcuong01ct1 2 роки тому

    Dear Friends,
    I have a question:
    1/ When and Why we should use LBO (Leveraged Buyout) to do M&A deal?. Thank you.

    • @ramajonnalagadda2993
      @ramajonnalagadda2993 2 роки тому +1

      Lbo’s are generally for private companies, m&a occurs for public securities there is more to it but this is a start

  • @MrCruelStreak
    @MrCruelStreak 10 років тому

    thank you sal ^-^

  • @dseer13
    @dseer13 6 років тому

    so they liquidate the assets if they turn out they don't have the money to pay back the principal or if the business isnt generating the amount of income one would have hoped? Thats when companys go bust and employees start losing their jobs.

  • @woo216
    @woo216 13 років тому

    thanks

  • @ups427
    @ups427 11 років тому +1

    well you're mixing it up a bit. Typically LBO senior secured debt is 36month to 48 months in term. this is dictated by banks, as a fund we don't have any say in this. we want a longer term they want a short term. No bank would allow you to do this deal at 10x ebitda without putting in 4-5x ebitda of equity. then there would be interest only 1-2x mezz and 3-4 senior which is amortized.

    • @andrecamacho7660
      @andrecamacho7660 Рік тому

      not 10x ebitda.... is worse then that ... is 10x net income

  • @inmortal009
    @inmortal009 9 років тому

    Wooah amazing

  • @mar79379
    @mar79379 6 років тому

    what software do you use to draw?

  • @pslink6437
    @pslink6437 7 років тому +28

    Who on earth would buy a business for 10 times EBITDA.

    • @chiragpatel849
      @chiragpatel849 7 років тому +4

      just an example

    • @SmartyPFc
      @SmartyPFc 6 років тому +35

      Most private equity firms...

    • @secondavenger9775
      @secondavenger9775 6 років тому +2

      IBM apparently would for Red Hat...

    • @mario34129
      @mario34129 5 років тому +14

      You mean 10 times net income?

    • @gkollias14
      @gkollias14 5 років тому +14

      net income is not EBITDA

  • @eh1114
    @eh1114 11 років тому

    ya, but if you already have money why would you want to borrow more money that requires you to pay interest?

  • @adamgrimsley2900
    @adamgrimsley2900 3 роки тому

    Nice

  • @neversayjello
    @neversayjello 8 років тому

    how do credit spreads affect a LBO??

  • @jxsilicon9
    @jxsilicon9 13 років тому +1

    @TheHumanAgenda
    Banks don't like running companies or owning real estate.

  • @samsonsoturian6013
    @samsonsoturian6013 2 роки тому

    Of course, the obvious danger of 10x leverage is that if business slums a little, you is in the hole

  • @scatman0925
    @scatman0925 2 місяці тому

    So is the primary pitpose of this just a tax arbitrage???

  • @ups427
    @ups427 11 років тому +2

    hey im a partner in a private equity fund. the idea that lbo senior debt is interest only is 100% false.

  • @jxsilicon9
    @jxsilicon9 13 років тому

    @TheHumanAgenda
    They don't like taking on risk. And they don't want to run a business or deal with real estate. They will just end up selling it at probably a lost. If you have a triple A rating or lots of collateral. Sure they will give you a good deal.But most deals are funded through other sources along with banking or instead of bank loans.Like a private equity firm already has millions,billions in capital from investors.But there are plenty of financial sources.

  • @weeeee880
    @weeeee880 7 років тому +10

    Is that you vladtv???!

  • @M4rtingale
    @M4rtingale 13 років тому +1

    @TheHumanAgenda
    Wow, a lot of economic illiteracy going around here.
    1) What prevents an indebted company from reinvesting its proceeds? Virtually no company these days operate without debt; in fact, debt makes possible ventures otherwise impossible because not a lot of people have or is willing to pay out of pocket the expense.
    2) The word "leverage" is meant to be taken outright; leverage magnifies the invested amount - the profit is quadrupled as a result, in this case.

  • @addydaddy1100
    @addydaddy1100 12 років тому

    What if i take whole of the money as loan which is 10 million, I will pay 1 million interest which will be deducted from pretax income leaving 500K. Now if I deduct 1/3rd of the tax which leaves aprrx 360000 as Net Income without even investing a single penny. Correct me if I am wrng.. Just curious if its right..?

  • @samarthsharma6993
    @samarthsharma6993 2 роки тому

    Beautifully explained .... but isn't 1/3rd of 600 k = 200k ?

    • @daan2377
      @daan2377 2 роки тому +1

      They pay 1/3rd so they keep 2/3rds so 400k

  • @Rocksteady365mac
    @Rocksteady365mac 6 років тому

    So what about paying the investment bank back the £9m? I assume it's when you sell the business to another private equity firm and use that money?

  • @jxsilicon9
    @jxsilicon9 13 років тому

    This is an interesting presentation. But nobody structures leverage buyouts like this. Well not anyone that knows what they're doing. You borrow less than the assets. So you can actually sell the assets to payoff the loan. Or you bring in other investors since banks only lend to about 10% of deals.

  • @TheJoezaidan
    @TheJoezaidan 2 роки тому

    One Question, you don't pay back the $ 9 million loan ?

  • @randombarbarian5637
    @randombarbarian5637 3 роки тому

    Maybe I'm missing something here, but did you forget to pay the principle of the loan? This should come out of the $400k/year. You were only calculating the interest payment of the loan.

  • @markolivito2167
    @markolivito2167 3 роки тому

    But you forgot the principal payments on $9mm loan!

  • @M4rtingale
    @M4rtingale 13 років тому

    @TheHumanAgenda I'm sorry, but that's not how demand works - especially not when we're talking million-dollar corporations. The value of the firm is carefully calculated (be it on a stand-alone basis or with synergies taken into account) by potential purchasers. What loans generates is liquidity. Liquidity in markets does not drive prices to explode or otherwise create inflation; liquidity results in prices being MORE accurate to the true value/NPV, and it helps attract the best people/managers

  • @mattmatt4916
    @mattmatt4916 8 років тому +2

    What was that at the 2.45-2.47 minute? Some squeezing the Truth in I SEA.. lol

  • @theodore123211
    @theodore123211 11 років тому +18

    then what happened to the debt with the bank? that $9 million doesn't need to be paid back? :O

    • @Manutschki
      @Manutschki 10 років тому +25

      Sell the assets and u got the money :) (usually)

    • @pratikthakur1191
      @pratikthakur1191 4 роки тому

      Exactly..what about the principal payment??

    • @RomilCPatel
      @RomilCPatel 3 роки тому

      @@pratikthakur1191
      It’s an interest only loan, so no principal payments.

  • @kevinesteves5530
    @kevinesteves5530 11 років тому

    Hey I didn't mean to mislead you, I am not the author of the Video. I was simply studying for the CFA and therefore was not in a very good mood. My comment was me being sarcastic, didn't mean to infer anything about you :) Sometimes you have to sacrifice realism to be able to make sth understandable, I think that is what the author did here.

  • @PedroJardo
    @PedroJardo 3 роки тому

    Wait, but why the money goes into the business? Isnt that a Cash out transaction?

  • @iamjacquesbarjon
    @iamjacquesbarjon 12 років тому

    so what happens to you if when you take over the company, the company goes belly up after the second year? the bank is gonna come looking for the 9million right? how do they get paid? do you have to raid your company's pension fund and start firing workers?

  • @akhiljohny5483
    @akhiljohny5483 2 роки тому +1

    Came here after reading about Elon Musk's plan to buy Twitter