Many person is asking so I'm making a comment ~(p v q) and ~p v ~q not the same. because ~(p v q) will be F F F T BUT ~p v ~q is F T T T i tried it with P Q R and it is more easier now. thank you so much Professor Trafor.
When you negate p, doesn’t the ~p become the original proposition that declares the fact is true when you do disjunction? For instance, ~pv~q. This disjunction is only to be true when one of it is true. So the ~p and ~q become the original propositions here as you are defining the disjunction based on these two propositions. E.g. ~p: He doesn’t have a cellphone. ~q: He doesn’t not get a car. When you do ~pv~q, doesn’t it become false only when both of these statements are opposite to their meanings (which are “he has a cellphone” and “ he has a car”)? I might need your explanation here, Sir.
Sir just like p conditional q is equal to negation of p disjunction q , same way p biconditional is equal to ?? Sir plz give me answer to this question plz sir🙏🙏
i know this video was posted 6 years ago but because of you i understand this concept
Not gunna lie, you just helped me understand something my professor couldn’t. I appreciate it.
I love how clear and step-by-step your approach is. The impact you make with these videos is just amazing. Thank you for your help.
Glad it helped!
I love the speed that you go through with these. Not TOO slow, not TOO fast. My Professor went through this stuff and was like BANG BANG BANG DONE.
You are saving my life right now. Thanks so much!
U r alive?🙂
I'm literally paying for a class that has this module but I never understood it there, but here thanks to you now I do!
Me too. I paid so much money for my uni degree, but I couldn't find this quality of teaching there.
I finally understand these and this is my second time taking this class. Thank you so much for your clarity and step-by-step solving.
How you not get this the first time 💀
@@zzzzzzzjsjyue2175 people have different learning curves. Dont be an ass about it. I didn't understand it the first time I took the class either
I have been struggling with this for 2 days and my professor just wants me to not understand it!! Thank you soooo much I finally get it!!
you are the only teacher who clear my concept easily thank you
Many person is asking so I'm making a comment
~(p v q) and ~p v ~q not the same.
because ~(p v q) will be F F F T BUT ~p v ~q is F T T T
i tried it with P Q R and it is more easier now.
thank you so much Professor Trafor.
Thank you so much for these videos, I wish my Teacher had such vigor during class to teach and enjoy teaching us.
Life saver. LOVE YOU MY GUY
You are really a good teacher.
Thank you this helped me understand a lot more
My prof took about an hour to explain and have nobody understand, what you did in three in a half minutes and help everybody understand
Hello sir I am very glad to see your videos n I want you to more updates
It’s sad that virtual learning has bought me here, teaching my selfie’s
You are incredibly much better than my teacher at my university in Sweden. Thanks to you, I will manage my exam without problems!
Thank you sir you helped for the online examination
Thank you so much! I can't believe I finally understood this =)
You helped me prepare for my exam . Thank you 😊
Good luck!
Saved me from my test next lecture😭
Great help, thanks!
Thanks
Could you please explain what the practical meaning of truth table is?
When you negate p, doesn’t the ~p become the original proposition that declares the fact is true when you do disjunction? For instance, ~pv~q. This disjunction is only to be true when one of it is true. So the ~p and ~q become the original propositions here as you are defining the disjunction based on these two propositions. E.g. ~p: He doesn’t have a cellphone. ~q: He doesn’t not get a car. When you do ~pv~q, doesn’t it become false only when both of these statements are opposite to their meanings (which are “he has a cellphone” and “ he has a car”)? I might need your explanation here, Sir.
~p or ~q is also true in the third case when p and q both are false at same time
The OR operator is true when "at least one statement is true"
Thankyou so much this helped me a lot
You're welcome!
day1 done 10 videos, now reviewing...Thanks!
Hi sir is that a Contradiction, Tautology or Contingency
Are true tables related to tensors in some way?
Sir just like p conditional q is equal to negation of p disjunction q , same way p biconditional is equal to ?? Sir plz give me answer to this question plz sir🙏🙏
I'm here because I like reading the dictionary and I came across the truth table and I was intrigued because it was invented in the 1920's
thank you
Thanks so much!
Thank you so much
I got a 92 on my test :)
You've saved my day!If you have a Patreon I would be happy to support you
Oh, So (~p) v(~q) is equal to ~(p ^ q).
is ~(p V q) similar to ~p V ~q ???
No dude it becomes negation of p and negation of q
is ~p v ~q the same as ~(p v q) ?
no, because ~(p v q) will be F F F T BUT ~p v ~q is F T T T
Why isn’t ~(pvq) the same?
((p→q)→~p)→(pvr) construct the truth table please
XNOR?
you should put your microphone on your side of the glass
I just want to go in a corner and cry
Garcia Edward Perez Nancy Hernandez Angela
So does he write everything correctly on his side of the glass panel and then just flip the video in post-editing? Otherwise what an animal.
Pagac Rest
Jackson Steven Harris Kenneth Clark Scott
Martin Jason Harris Deborah Martin Matthew
2024 here
Williams Anna Williams David Thomas Lisa
Kunze Cove
Hehe boy