I study computer science and software engineering in Botswana(Africa) and your videos are really helpful...A job well done to you sir for touching lives across the globe❤🖤
Again sir, Your eagerness to get intuition about any mathematical concept and come with the correct intuition ,is the thing that makes you great and special. Thank you sir for this masterpiece.
I so much appreciate the detail and clarity of Dr. Bazett's teaching. I remember I used to get upset when I felt a teacher skipped a step in the logical progression from hypotheses to conclusions. Thanks much!
This man is good,but couldn't get the actual concept so I intended to search for other UA-cam videos about Modus ponens and Modus Tollens. Until I found a channel named "the wisdom annex", which helped me a lot.
Thank you. I failed to grasp this from the text in my online critical thinking course. You cleared it up in a succinct but informative way. Keep up the good work.
I teach this and you just raised the bar for learning resources with an awesome video! I'm sharing the link to this with my argument mapping students when we discuss defeasible modus ponens schemes. Awesome!
Hey mate You're a truly hero! I "subscribed" myself on a "top uni", which assumes students have to know all the proofs on a weekly basis after receiving no guidance at all on the topics. You have made easier for this week. Thank you so much
Conjunction /\ = TRUE only when both components are true Disjunction \/ = FALSE only when both components are false Conditional --> FALSE only when antecedent is TRUE and consequent is False Bi-Conditional TRUE only when both antecedent and consequent have the same truth value ~p = IS NOT /\ = AND \/ = OR
Why does he have p=f and q=f resulting in a p->q=T premise? I thought "Disjunction \/ = FALSE only when both components are false". Should not the premise for the above example be p->q=F?
Nice. You’ve found your niche. Tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of $ spent on college for an explanation with no proof; then I go on UA-cam and it’s explained perfectly for free.
Thank you for this excellent explanation!✌🏼❤️🙏🏼 So much better than the textbook and professor of my Philosophy 300 class explained basic argument formula. But no worries eh? They only require correct knowledge of what they haven't explained adequately on quizzes and exams for your grade. Lmao😆🤣
Hi, this video is very helpful. I have a question sir, what if the form of argument is like this If p, then q. ~p Therefore, ~q Hoping for your answer, sir! Have a good day!
If the opposing position is fallacious, then what they have stated was based on errors of reasoning. Yeah, the opposing position was fallacious, therefore what they stated, was based on errors reasoning.
please want to ask what if the first premises and conclusion is false but the last premises and the last conclusion is true would the statement be valid or invalid
can someone explain to me why the third row is true for p implies q? i don't understand how he's getting true if p is false and q is true. Thanks for clearing this up.
This really helps me out during coronavirus times, where I don't get very clear descriptions because remote learning.
Yep
It should also help see thru the absurdities and measures by governments surrounding this Fauxvid-19 😌
Absolutely
@@thinkinsidetheboxsquarecir3303 Did your stupidity age well? Or are you still doubled down
@@thinkinsidetheboxsquarecir3303 crackpot
I study computer science and software engineering in Botswana(Africa) and your videos are really helpful...A job well done to you sir for touching lives across the globe❤🖤
You are a godsend! UA-cam's sparsely populated in terms of philosophy videos, so seeing this was quite appreciated -- not to mention refreshing
Again sir, Your eagerness to get intuition about any mathematical concept and come with the correct intuition ,is the thing that makes you great and special.
Thank you sir for this masterpiece.
I so much appreciate the detail and clarity of Dr. Bazett's teaching. I remember I used to get upset when I felt a teacher skipped a step in the logical progression from hypotheses to conclusions. Thanks much!
I study Information and Technology in Poland and it seemed helpful to me aswell, so you do in fact help students around the globe!
I'm just trying to figure out how on this world he has that technology with his youtube vids damnn
kkkk oh yes idem
A glass plate and editing software?
free tay k
is he writing backwards, impressed.
@@DrTrefor 😂🤫
Currently a cadet at USMA. This has been much more helpful than my instructor. Thank you so much.
This man is good,but couldn't get the actual concept so I intended to search for other UA-cam videos about Modus ponens and Modus Tollens. Until I found a channel named "the wisdom annex", which helped me a lot.
Thank you. I failed to grasp this from the text in my online critical thinking course. You cleared it up in a succinct but informative way. Keep up the good work.
the best video on this topic
that i found on internet
very interesting way of teaching. The one I couldn't understand with two hours of class, this vid made me understand within 8 min.
writing an exam on expert system, we had a class on this, refreshing my mind with the video before the exam. exam starts in an hour. wish me goodluck
I'm from India and it was pretty tough to understand it from the books, but your video made me understand it.
Thanks.
Thank you so much, I honestly understand this so much better than my textbook explains this! 🙏🙌
Thank you I was so lost with this concept you made it so much easier to understand!!
You're very welcome!
I like how you showed us where the variables are in the sentence
I teach this and you just raised the bar for learning resources with an awesome video! I'm sharing the link to this with my argument mapping students when we discuss defeasible modus ponens schemes. Awesome!
Thanks, that's awesome!
Hey mate You're a truly hero! I "subscribed" myself on a "top uni", which assumes students have to know all the proofs on a weekly basis after receiving no guidance at all on the topics.
You have made easier for this week. Thank you so much
Thanks so much and good luck this semester!
Conjunction /\ = TRUE only when both components are true
Disjunction \/ = FALSE only when both components are false
Conditional --> FALSE only when antecedent is TRUE and consequent is False
Bi-Conditional TRUE only when both antecedent and consequent have the same truth value
~p = IS NOT
/\ = AND
\/ = OR
UNKPCRIDE Thank you. Been looking for these all over the internet but I’m stupid. Might just pass this exam now lmao.
Thank you so much
Why does he have p=f and q=f resulting in a p->q=T premise? I thought "Disjunction \/ = FALSE only when both components are false". Should not the premise for the above example be p->q=F?
I think you just saved my life😂
I'm a brazilian student of I.T. and I wasn't understanding that. Thank you for your video.
Pensava que eu era o unico Br 😅
Dear Sir, Your explanation was amazing
This is super helpful, especially because you look so much like Jack Whitehall, but without the british accent.
You should get the 1000 bucks I pay each month and not the university which sent me a copy and pasted script that doesn't explain anything lol.
For. Real.
Or you shouldn’t be lazy and actually engage the text
@@coimbralawyou can do that, it’s rather inefficient for social creatures.
Thank you so much Trefor, you really make discrete maths fun like they should be
Glad you think so!
Beautifully explained like always. Thank you!!
This man is a god
brilliant teaching skill.
You just saved me from discrete mathematics... ❤❤
Tomorrow is my final exam from Fuzzy Control. Thanks for information 🙋🏻♂️
thanks for teaching me all this stuff in eighth minutes
Good work trefor. Thank you ❤🌹 love from india
And we do all that in a split second when we're deciding whether to cross a busy road or not.
I found a new way of teaching. awesome. really awesome
thank you so much, sir, you just filled the gap in my mind in just 8-minutes video
stay blessed
that's exactly what i needed ! a Canadian who doesn't want to be POTUS....
Wow what a wonderful explanation
thank u, I more of understand what was the difference because we have to report this in class
Thank you for such a lifesaving video
this really helped me thank you dude , you are great
Nice. You’ve found your niche. Tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of $ spent on college for an explanation with no proof; then I go on UA-cam and it’s explained perfectly for free.
Perfectly explained. Thanks alot.
thank you sir for your so much efforts
Thank you for doing these videos. They are really helpfull.
Thanks so much for posting this, it has definitely helped me!!
HELLO. I AM BRAZILIAN AND I WAS FIND THIS CLASS. I LIKE VERY MUTCH. THIS WILL BE HELP ME. THANK YOU AND SORRY ABOUT MY INGLISH.
Thank You for clear crystal concept.
These videos are very helpful, thank you
Glad to hear that!
I love your course. It really helps a lot!
So glad it is helping!
Thanks a lot sir, this really helped me
and btw u look-alike pewdiepie
This lesson was extremly useful. Thanks a lot
very well explained & easy to follow. Great Job Man
Thank you very much sir 🔥
Finally I found gold
Thank you for the high quality lesson.
Very carefully & the example is so good.
Best tutor ever seen...💐💐 thank you
Thank you. I understood you better than to my teacher...
Hypothetical syllogisms are tricky. Truth tables test my patience.
Called it! I could tell you were Canadian because you kinda talk like Dawid Does Tech.
I felt cheered with all this. Modua pollens is probably the Aristotle logic ?
thank you so much ❤💯 really appreciate your good work
These vedios are very helpful.. 😍Thanks a lot sir!! ♥️🙏💐
hurray! Got it
Thank you for this excellent explanation!✌🏼❤️🙏🏼 So much better than the textbook and professor of my Philosophy 300 class explained basic argument formula. But no worries eh? They only require correct knowledge of what they haven't explained adequately on quizzes and exams for your grade. Lmao😆🤣
Trefor Bazett thank you, you're appreciated greatly.
This helped me a lot... Thanks.
Glad it helped!
thanks man!
crazy how this fit with logical programming LOL
you are awesome in teaching. thank you.
Thankyou so much! ❤️
good explaination
I could have sworn this guy was the POTUS
shout out from Cali
Really Helped Me.. 👌👍
Thank man. Great explanation.
I'd vote for a Mathematician as POTUS
Terrible idea.
you are a godsend
Hi, this video is very helpful. I have a question sir, what if the form of argument is like this
If p, then q.
~p
Therefore, ~q
Hoping for your answer, sir! Have a good day!
No one could have done better 🔥
soooooooo amazing Trefor, keep going :)
Can you show the truth table of Modus tollens
Is there another argument form which states
“if p then q”
not p
therefore, not q?”
If the opposing position is fallacious, then what they have stated was based on errors of reasoning.
Yeah, the opposing position was fallacious, therefore what they stated, was based on errors reasoning.
great video man! keep it up :)
Thanks, will do!
you are amazing
Thank you!
Hello!! I can't find the Playlist for this course, I'm loving your videos: D Could you please provide it to me in advance Thank you
Check out the description for all the vids. Shortcut: ua-cam.com/play/PLHXZ9OQGMqxersk8fUxiUMSIx0DBqsKZS.html
*so if p→q is that : if truth is truth then it's true, and if Ffalse is Ttruth then is Ttrue, and if Ttruth is Ffalse then its Ffalse*
You used modus toluns argument to explain modus toluns to us 😅
thank you sir
Really helped me.
I understand now, thank you
0:56 / 8:43
Logical Arguments - Modus Ponens & Modus Tollens
I am so confused because my teacher doesn't call it by these names and it is really throwing me off.
please want to ask what if the first premises and conclusion is false but the last premises and the last conclusion is true would the statement be valid or invalid
you're GOATED
That isn’t anywhere approaching a word.
Damn, getting heavy around 1:50 haha
Do you write it oppositely on the transparent board? :O
First Method Should Explained Briefly
including Premises
You Can give mathematical Example
can someone explain to me why the third row is true for p implies q? i don't understand how he's getting true if p is false and q is true. Thanks for clearing this up.