The BEST INTERFACE Under $1000

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 119

  • @ColtCapperrune
    @ColtCapperrune  Рік тому +10

    Lots of great boxes out there, this one is my favorite for both it’s form factor, and function. Thanks for watching!

  • @sijel
    @sijel Рік тому +15

    Great presentation and logical thought processes (as usual from you)
    Note: Audient ID44 MkII is only $699 at our fav Sweetwater.
    It has FOUR independent artist cue mixes. 😮
    And talk about Console preamps! 🎉
    And it has dedicated balanced Insert points for using outboard gear on the preamps OR patching in your own BAE/Neve/WarmAudio channel strips 😃

    • @ColtCapperrune
      @ColtCapperrune  Рік тому +1

      In researching, for this set up, I looked at that one as well. Looks like a great option for the money!

    • @JustPlayitc00l
      @JustPlayitc00l Рік тому

      @zackdarce You said it

    • @WisdomHouseCreative
      @WisdomHouseCreative Рік тому +1

      ​@zackdarceThe converters aren't as good on the ID44.

    • @matthewlemke5310
      @matthewlemke5310 8 місяців тому +1

      The mbox studio is on sale right now for $599

    • @CanalHW
      @CanalHW 2 місяці тому

      @@matthewlemke5310$499 as of Nov 2024 with a free perpetual PT License

  • @tumi6ocdn
    @tumi6ocdn Рік тому +13

    Hey Colt, great video as always. I don't know man, I actually feel the Audient ID44mkii is the better buy here - just as powerful, great preamps, more adat I/O (enough outputs to run a minimum atmos rig). Honestly the only thing missing is the metering section on the MBOX and midi I/O. But its nearly half the price. Worth a thought

    • @tawmifm
      @tawmifm 3 місяці тому

      And the DSP

  • @NoeAnton
    @NoeAnton Рік тому +9

    I would go for the Audient ID44 MkII. A couple more features for $100 less

    • @imdurc
      @imdurc Рік тому

      Nah, this guy searched and found no other interfaces with the same features! /s

    • @thebeatmajors_yt
      @thebeatmajors_yt Рік тому

      @@imdurc people don't like to listen lol

    • @imdurc
      @imdurc Рік тому

      They sure don't! :P @@thebeatmajors_yt

  • @ivan.bofinger
    @ivan.bofinger Рік тому +2

    This looks fenomenal. Cool to see avid going in a more “modern” direction, similar to the RME and their TotalMix sofware, which I use and love ❤️

  • @jorgegaladi6732
    @jorgegaladi6732 Рік тому +2

    Dear Colt. Long time suscriber. I have AudioMedia III, Original Cyan M-Box, Digi 001 and 002. Aside an MIX ++ setup. DIgidesign was bad giving support for older interfaces once they develop another batch of newer interfaces. 2 years ago I tried RME and I cant go back. Now I have 3 RME interfaces for Protools. If Avid would be like RME and still support 20 years old interfaces I would go back with them. I really hope your interface to be still supported in 5 years. I guess you will end getting an Appollo from Upstair Studio A once you do the Atmos setup. I encorage you to embrace Dante to have connected Studio A and B for Tracking a band on both simultaneously. Thanks for your videos. Always inspiring.

    • @Studio22mix
      @Studio22mix Рік тому +2

      Yepp, I agree.
      Never Avid again, I had a Digi002 with lots of RTA plugins, all useless. If Avid as a manufacturer screws up the clients for more money and create a lot of electronic waist for the environment then you totally suck as a company period.
      When a company like Neyerink needs to provide drivers to get the expensive Pro Control and C24 surfaces working and Avid as a producer doesn’t want to do it then I never spend a dime again even if they make the best of the best, which they don’t.
      My setup is RME with Reaper, companies that care about their end users and RME has up to date drivers for interfaces over 15 years old. 👊🏼

    • @diebygaming8015
      @diebygaming8015 9 місяців тому

      @@Studio22mix i am currently looking at the mbox studio because my RME ufx ii is super unreliable, the mic input to windows just stopped working and it sounds distorted at high sampling rates.

  • @chemdrum
    @chemdrum Рік тому +4

    This is one of those interfaces that can easily get overlooked, or at least I may have overlooked. I've been caught up with the UAD stuff so much but this one is a great buy! If you compare the Mbox Studio to the Apollo Twin(both are fairly in the same price point) it shows that off hand out the box you get a bit more with this one. The Apollos just offer the unison technology to record thru virtual preamps. However, it's still more things to pay for when buying those preamps and plugins to work with the unison pres. Great video as always!

  • @natehine8541
    @natehine8541 Рік тому +2

    my RME was 2500 like 25 years ago .. 100 a year is cheap right lol .. re capped it myself last year.. total mix is great this has a mixer like it .. that mixer is the best thing to have

  • @demondrive147
    @demondrive147 Рік тому +3

    Lately I got interested in RME babyface pro as an upgrade under 1000$ for home studio. What's your views on RME?

  • @brucetroy2558
    @brucetroy2558 Рік тому +2

    Love your videos - always informative and entertaining.

  • @CryzorBeatz
    @CryzorBeatz 6 місяців тому

    Hey Colt! great video again ! I really like how you review things and I bought this interface because of my old apogee element 24. The roundtrip of the avid mbox is higher but not a big deal at all I think. I ordered this interface at thomann from Germany. They give every person who ordered this interface a perpetual PT Studio with one year support. So I used every other DAW out there and everybody told me to not switch to pro tools but for me it feels right and I used the free version called intro I think and something happens inside myself when I start these DAW every time. I feel like coming home haha it's a lot of stuff to learn but at the end it's a phenomenal DAW and has a great community so far ! Thanks for your videos !
    greetings Cryzor

  • @Funkybassuk
    @Funkybassuk Рік тому

    I love the look of it, especially all of the I/O. I’m happy with my UAD interfaces but this looks great value for money. I remember the old Mbox from decades ago.

  • @IcemanTheDj
    @IcemanTheDj Рік тому +2

    I have 2 independent headphone mixes on MiniFuse 4... 🤭 For what I do, there are enough inputs. Of course we talk about different levels of sound interfaces. Just saying that there are also cheaper interfaces that do independent headphones mixes, if that is all that matter to one. 😏

  • @PoopieLukie
    @PoopieLukie Рік тому +4

    Pretty sure the audient iD44 has independent headphone mixes and everything else you mentioned? Can someone correct me if I’m wrong?

    • @ColtCapperrune
      @ColtCapperrune  Рік тому +2

      I think that box is probably the next best option! Personally, I like the layout and function of this one a bit better, but that is definitely a capable box!

    • @PoopieLukie
      @PoopieLukie Рік тому +1

      I hope it serves you well!

    • @MolochFrolics
      @MolochFrolics 9 місяців тому +1

      no midi no reamp no bluetooth

  • @fescolfaro
    @fescolfaro Рік тому +2

    4 mic pres are a good plus, but if I'm honest, once I get that close to $1.000 I'll just do RME. I've got a Babyface Pro FS as a portable bus powered unit (which I assume this isn't), and a Fireface UCX2, which has 6 analog outs and 8 analog ins, connected to a MOTU 8pre-es via adat AND sending AES digital to my main monitors (plus Auratones). The only thing that makes this avid box attractive is Pro Tools (which I don't care for).

  • @ErixSamson
    @ErixSamson Рік тому +4

    Being a Cubase user I've never considered AVID. But this one seems to be interesting.

    • @ColtCapperrune
      @ColtCapperrune  Рік тому +4

      For many many years, their hardware was limited to ProTools. Only, in recent years, they’ve made a change, and I think that is really good.

  • @Saintknick
    @Saintknick 9 місяців тому +1

    Hey Colt, I have looked at the new Motu 828which even has a built in mixer along with a good cue mix app,please when you get a chance tell me what you think

  • @thedonkwhisperer
    @thedonkwhisperer Рік тому +2

    I feel kind of dumb to have to ask this but how is this a 21 input interface if it only has 2 mic inputs on the front and 2 on the back? I can't record a drum kit with more than 4 mics right? WTF am I missing?

  • @mrmozez1500
    @mrmozez1500 Рік тому +32

    ID44 is significantly better than this box. Also, I don't think many gearheads will like the whole toyish/carnival look of this piece. I'm just saying....

    • @burrellbrothersentertainme2281
      @burrellbrothersentertainme2281 Рік тому +9

      I HATE.. when gear looks like “fun”… I like them ugly, heavy and serious… sleek is cool but all the bright cheerful kiddie colors… NO… HELL NO

    • @mrmozez1500
      @mrmozez1500 Рік тому

      @@burrellbrothersentertainme2281Exactly! I don't know who designs some of these pieces, but why would anyone want an expensive piece of hardware to look like a toy from the Carnival? Based on looks alone, I guarantee not many sales are being made in regards to this unit. AVID needs to hire a whole new team and get it together.

    • @thebeatmajors_yt
      @thebeatmajors_yt Рік тому +8

      you really came in here and said "imma be a hater" lol there's stuff this does that audient does not and it's clear if you really knew both pieces of gear.

    • @mrmozez1500
      @mrmozez1500 Рік тому

      ​@@thebeatmajors_yt Maybe you're referring to the extra LED Meters, or that the Avid has a maximum sample rate of 192khz. I will admit that the additional analog outs are nice, but aesthetics of the gear is important to a lot of people, especially serious studio heads. I'm just saying, a piece that looks like a toy may not appeal to serious gear owners in many pro studio settings. I think the ID44 Sync I/O feature may appeal the a great number of users, which I believe the Avid does not have. The Audient also has a built in High Pass Filter, only achievable by Avid via software. The look of the gear matters to me, as well as a large population of other mature studio owners. I never said I hate the units' functionality... I said it looks like a toy... and it does. I guess we'll just have to wait and see if this becomes a staple in professional studio settings. I don't think it will IMHO.

    • @WisdomHouseCreative
      @WisdomHouseCreative Рік тому +2

      The conversion on the ID44 is mediocre.

  • @Euphonicmusicschool
    @Euphonicmusicschool Рік тому

    Arturia Audiofuse Studio. $899. It has all the same connectivity plus more, I would venture a guess to better preamps, one-for-one buttons, multiple HP mixes, built in reamp, and is a usb hub. Fairly extensive mix software but easy to understand and has a button on the interface to open said software.

    • @dijital4588
      @dijital4588 11 місяців тому

      It’s definitely Audiofuse vs MBOX for me. Both are loaded for the price. The usb hub is such a nice addition. But, one thing I read that might be a deal breaker is monitor outs are not balanced on the audiofuse. Without balanced trs going into my monitors I get noticeable noise (likely from my PC or my UPS). Also, if I purchase MBOX within the next few days, Avid will include a $600 perpetual license for Pro Tools Studio. Want.

  • @DozaVybz
    @DozaVybz Рік тому +3

    when I see colt I click.. wagwaan king

  • @olafkliemt1145
    @olafkliemt1145 Рік тому

    thanks for this review, it has been in my cart for a while. another one would be the Tascam Series 208i which has separate headphone mixes, too.

  • @wynton765
    @wynton765 Рік тому +2

    899!??? YEP I have to get this!!! Great video!!

    • @ColtCapperrune
      @ColtCapperrune  Рік тому +2

      Killer box for the money in my opinion! Thanks for watching!

  • @Bonzvy
    @Bonzvy Рік тому

    I am not a fan of table top interfaces but i love the feat it has. Never heard of an interface that have a reamp box in it. Are there any interface alternatives in rack size that has that?

  • @Bloemanstudio
    @Bloemanstudio Рік тому

    Great info Colt! I have a duet 2 and want to upgrade to a interface under 3000 and still thinking which to pick up! Thanks

  • @phoenixbenjamin
    @phoenixbenjamin 8 місяців тому

    Hey Colt, Can I plug my PT HD system w/2 196’s into this? Instead of adding an Apollo? Great video. Thank you,

  • @QMusicUK
    @QMusicUK Рік тому

    Nice piece! May I ask an unrelated question please. What display is that you’re using?

  • @ericlee5935
    @ericlee5935 Рік тому

    The downside of it for me was that you’re not allowed to route directly from pro tools to the adat/digital outputs, you need to route them to the mbox control software and then to the adat BUT there’s only 8 outs so… that’s it, you can’t have those outputs and different analog outputs and so on… finally went to the Neumann mt48 and that’s a beast (goes beyond the $1000 tough)

  • @jadzz2810
    @jadzz2810 Рік тому +1

    How would you compare this with Audient ID44 or Motu M6?

  • @steadroybrookes9057
    @steadroybrookes9057 Рік тому

    My Mackie Big Knob Series, 3x2 Studio Monitor Controller does all these but it started acting up after couple years of use. So I'm looking for an interface and monitor upgrade.

  • @kadiummusic
    @kadiummusic 10 місяців тому

    SSL12 with the 360 software is a total no brainer! 😎

  • @raymondharrisoncomposer
    @raymondharrisoncomposer 7 місяців тому

    MBOX STUDIO is my next interface

  • @davidfabien7220
    @davidfabien7220 8 місяців тому

    Although I have the TL Audio Classic preamps and a Focusrite ISA One preamp I really like the preamps in the old AVID M Box Pro. It's much more superior to the other interfaces in the same category. I hope AVID would make a stripped down version of the M Box Studio that's more affordable than the original one.

  • @drillgirl718
    @drillgirl718 Місяць тому

    for the price its good that you can bypass the preamps when using your hardware right?

  • @JackHaveman
    @JackHaveman Рік тому

    The Arturia audiofuse studio does exactly the same and more like usb hub, 2x adat. The avid has a nicer colorfull interface although.

  • @launchpadmcquack98
    @launchpadmcquack98 Рік тому

    I think "best" really comes down to what you need. The MBox is crazy, but I'n my case I only have one pair of monitors, rarely record more than one input at a time and NEED a clean, powerful headphone amp with low impedance to power my planars.
    After a ton of research, the Topping E2X2 was the only interface that fit the bill for me. The mic pres are extremely clean and the headphone amp is unmatched in any interface I've seen. It has multiple virtual outs with loopback, and it costs the same as other 2in2out interfaces like the Scarlett 2i2 or the Volt while absolutely blowing them out of the water in pretty much every category.

  • @laserjakk3629
    @laserjakk3629 4 місяці тому

    Hey Colt, how does it perform on Mac OS? And the round trip latency? Could you check the RTL in 44.100khz / 24bit/ 128 and 256 buffer size to show us the milliseconds?

  • @jeffhassell1725
    @jeffhassell1725 7 місяців тому

    Cole what would you recommend for an 8 channel audio interface around 1000.00?

  • @TheMcinku
    @TheMcinku Рік тому

    Arturia Audiofuse Studio does everything this interface does and more.

  • @KitoRodriguez
    @KitoRodriguez Рік тому

    Sold my UA with the old Thunderbolt and bought this MBOX. I am a "vet" and it is fabulous! Great mic pre's, a pretty unit. MBOX control makes it easy to get r done, unlike UA Console. DOPE!

  • @PierreBaudinat
    @PierreBaudinat 5 місяців тому

    Thank you.
    Only 8 software inputs for 22 hardware outputs : NO WAY !

  • @BOODA575
    @BOODA575 Рік тому

    do you not use opals or ns10s anymore

  • @rjb7569
    @rjb7569 Рік тому

    Colt...
    I know you run a Mac. Do you know how solid this is with a Windows PC? For example, some Thunderbolt interfaces flunk the Windows tests, despite the claims.
    And Windows latency?
    Will be using Studio One as the DAW.
    Your vids are quite helpful to rookies like me.

    • @Bogdan_Tolm
      @Bogdan_Tolm Рік тому

      If you’re talking about windows, nowadays, one issue is usually is “Drivers” just check how solid it runs with drivers and that’s it. It’s usb c interface and not thunderbolt one

    • @thearno2885
      @thearno2885 9 місяців тому

      I couldnt connect to download the firmware my Win 10 desktop. I had to use my Win laptop 11 to flash the firmware but once that was done it worked fine with Win 10. The FX loops are a game changer as you can use these for guitars and synths and they work a treat.

  • @jeettheband
    @jeettheband Рік тому +1

    Does it work 100% with Pc and Windows?

  • @staysikth
    @staysikth 2 місяці тому

    This or the presonus quantum hd8?

  • @JayfkProductions876
    @JayfkProductions876 Рік тому

    They always mention those high
    I/0 that are via ADAT 😂 Focusrite 18i8 3rd Gen does similar for less.. Including The 2 Headphones Out + The 4X Mic/Instrument in

  • @mixinginthebox
    @mixinginthebox Рік тому +1

    Nice ty..

  • @WorshipWithMatt
    @WorshipWithMatt Рік тому

    Arturia has something very similar to this honestly, that is very very good!

  • @KingJamesFive20
    @KingJamesFive20 Рік тому

    So would you say this interface is better than the Digi 192?

  • @ProducerStefanSchnabel
    @ProducerStefanSchnabel Рік тому

    What is with the Apollo x4?

  • @anthemmakersmusic
    @anthemmakersmusic Рік тому +1

    Quantum is 599.99 ? On sale hurry!

  • @mikeriemersma716
    @mikeriemersma716 Рік тому

    A lot of interfaces have SPDIF in/out. What do people use these for?

    • @LukeBares
      @LukeBares 9 місяців тому

      I connect my speakers to it.. I have not tested it, but in my head I get better quality since I can stay digital and do not have to use the converters of the interface to go to my speakers

  • @KingJamesFive20
    @KingJamesFive20 Рік тому

    I had the Digi 001 in 2001

  • @orphnmusic4231
    @orphnmusic4231 4 місяці тому

    Hi does anyone know if this Interface also is working on Windows 11? I need to get a new one since the Drivers for mine won't be updated anymore and neither Pro Tools oe Nuendo can find it anymore. Would be happy to get some opinions and thanks beforehand!

  • @nissoubeats5900
    @nissoubeats5900 Рік тому

    guys do i go for this one or Apollo X4 Heritage Edition

  • @bryanrosario1361
    @bryanrosario1361 Рік тому +2

    First one today

  • @MO4Africa
    @MO4Africa Рік тому

    Cool video

  • @drillgirl718
    @drillgirl718 Місяць тому

    that intro guitar took that melody from selena amor prohibido lol

  • @konafama
    @konafama 2 місяці тому

    11months later...still the perfect box for you?

  • @gfromshankside
    @gfromshankside Рік тому +1

    Ah-hem... ✋️😩
    [cough cough] Arturia Audiofuse Studio

    • @gfromshankside
      @gfromshankside Рік тому

      No, seriously...😂 It's literally a knockoff of the Arturia Audiofuse Studio, just with a few LESS features.

  • @checkitout611
    @checkitout611 Рік тому +1

    Presonus 2626 ..... Thunderbolt! Less than $700

  • @VangelisPapatzanakis
    @VangelisPapatzanakis 9 місяців тому

    It looks like a Stars Wars controller or something when is not powered… :)

  • @dudemcgee256
    @dudemcgee256 Рік тому +2

    Spend a little more and get you a Cranborne R8.

    • @ColtCapperrune
      @ColtCapperrune  Рік тому +2

      I hadn’t seen that before, looks like a very interesting box!

  • @emanuelwhitehead6039
    @emanuelwhitehead6039 2 місяці тому

    Don’t care about features only sound conversion

  • @JUSTOFTO
    @JUSTOFTO Рік тому +2

    can you be my mentor 🥲

    • @ColtCapperrune
      @ColtCapperrune  Рік тому +2

      If you take the time to watch every video on the channel, you will get more info than I could give you in two years in person 😜🙏🏻

  • @madebyjoshi
    @madebyjoshi Рік тому

    Audient ID44 or even ID22 for the win!

  • @swh0rd682
    @swh0rd682 Рік тому +2

    Lost me at AVID....

    • @xicoamc
      @xicoamc Рік тому +1

      ahahahah I understand you!

  • @dannyleiva6059
    @dannyleiva6059 8 місяців тому +1

    Really? You have antelope, RME, universal audio and you choose AVID??? 🤣 cmon!

  • @seancannister
    @seancannister Рік тому +1

    Probably a decent interface but it looks so childish!

  • @lucasjuniorproducer
    @lucasjuniorproducer Рік тому

    Avid equals Protools, so never in my Apollo Studio, I am a Cubase guy for 25 years, but i respect..

  • @anthemmakersmusic
    @anthemmakersmusic Рік тому

    The Mboc is a very good sounding interface.

  • @xicoamc
    @xicoamc Рік тому +1

    Easy, it's the RME Babyface PRO

  • @nuendo2496
    @nuendo2496 Рік тому

    Nope...RME .

  • @donkeyhead68
    @donkeyhead68 10 місяців тому

    How does this compare to the Arturia Audiofuse Studio?

  • @DGNOGaudio
    @DGNOGaudio 9 місяців тому

    want to get an audio interface review video, if you get some intersting please give me your Email, thanks