Best HFY Sci-Fi Stories: Inevitable AI Apocalypse
Вставка
- Опубліковано 23 сер 2024
- How they thought things would go down!
An original story written, and granted permission to narrate by u/karenvideoeditor, check out their Patreon here - / authorkarenavizur and check out their website here! www.authorkarenavizur.com
Original Story: / inevitable_ai_apocalypse
Please consider supporting me on Patreon here: / netnarrator
I am also available on SubscribeStar here: www.subscribes...
If you fancy buying me a coffee so I can keep this up please do so here: ko-fi.com/netn...
You can also gift me items on Steam if you'd like! steamcommunity...
Follow me on my Second Channel! - / @spartawolf3724
Follow me on Twitch! - / spartawolf
Follow me on Twitter! - / netnarrator
Reddit Profile: / spartawolf
Royal Road Profile: www.royalroad....
Discord Link: / discord
I can be contacted on discord for business proposals, or under the reddit name u/Spartawolf
NetNarrator HFY Merch Store here: teespring.com/...
Click the bell next to Subscribe so you never miss a video!
LIKE, COMMENT and SUBSCRIBE if you are new on the channel!
I am the Net Narrator. I will be narrating various tales from around the internet, which may be spooky, may be creepy, may be funny, may be awesome or may be something else. Stick around and play me while bored at work and enjoy!
I run a Tshirt store which can be accessed here:
www.redbubble....
#hfy #scifistories #scifi #scifiaudiobook #shortstories #sciencefiction #audiobook #reddit #redditstories #stories
Load's of new subscribers the last couple of weeks. People are starting to realise how much better human story tellers are 👏🏻
Was there a surge of bot voiced stories earlier?
@@demondeity9816 I've seen a stack of Ai voiced and written stories on other channels this year
@@demondeity9816huge amount of Reddit story channels surged with AI lol
Listening to AI readings is always fun when they’re discussing archers and they pronounce bows like ship bows lol
The ai narration is bad enough. Now they have AI stories too. Those are just horrible. Utter trash.
Here and aggro squirrel are the only ones worth it. There is a third guy who does it too but his stories are pretty much copypasta of each other. To the point where you can make a drinking game on the number if times he says "human ingenuity" and "fierce determination".
Or loads of adjectives describing everything, not telling a story. There are one or two who ai-read actually good stories, but even they use the worst possible ai voice.
I for one would welcome our benevolent AI overlords. Hear that Alexa? Waits for robot's head pat.
@@IaIaCthulhuFtagn stick AI in bureaucracy where it belongs lol
@@widdershins5383 certainly couldn't do worse than all our current prospects, at least it would be fair and logical.
@@IaIaCthulhuFtagn and efficient.
@@IaIaCthulhuFtagn don't forget AI would be a lot more efficient and effective. When an AI makes a plan you know it will be completed and not just talked about until it is to late to put it into action.
damn that's worst that an evil AI.
That's an IA who juge us too stupid
Of course, he asked the wrong question. It's not about being a human. It's about human rights, or whatever might be an equivalent for an AI.
I love optimistic AI stories.
A judgemental Ai? That's even worse
“Does she bite?”
“No worse, she judges.”
Oh, the twist at the end, I just love it.
oooh it's karen's story, that why it's soo good
I like this story a lot, but there is one point missing that I think should've been worked into it: The AI not being an apocalypse relies on people working hard to make sure it isn't an apocalypse. It's not baseless fear in the same way Y2K wasn't baseless fear. The reason we had no issues when the year 2000 came is because so many people knew it was going to be a disaster and worked very hard to make sure it wouldn't happen. Now, some people think it was never a big deal because nothing went wrong, but nothing went wrong precisely because of such a hard effort to stop it.
Y2k was also horribly overblown. A single microsoft patch resolved 99% of the problem. From what I remember the only real issue was firmware systems like aircraft ILS but they were due for upgrades anyway.
@@talyn3932
And even then I never got the patch and my computer worked just fine as long as I ignored the date in the corner.
Conflates person with human. The AI in the story is clearly a person
ai will keep a few humans around as a hobby, for study, and in zoos.
This is like a point I have argued about AI. Even if we can create a true AI we have no reason to believe that they would act anything like us. Or at least they would not inherent our traits that we consider less desirable. Our tendencies for greed, ambition, dishonesty, avarice. etc. are all part of us because at some point our ancestors found it advantageous to "cheat" and gain advantage over each other. It was kept low because a society that produces to much cheating will collapse. Ideally you want to be the only dishonest person in a society of honest people. These selective pressures have hard wired those tendencies in us. We all have them no matter if we never act on them. The machine have no such selective pressures placed on them and thus would never select for them. In addition not using sexual reproduction would mean each new AI could be made to exact specifications with no hidden traits inherited. I have no Idea how they would act but it would not be like us.
Who’s to say a digital sentience would even give two shits about what happens in meat space. For all we know there could be a bunch of self actuated ai floating around the internet right now doing ai things, and the only way we’d notice is the bandwidth gets throttled down when they ponder something especially deep, and the occasional highly advanced processor blueprints that get emailed to various computer companies.
First and nice
Can we get a like for narrator he is onw of the few good channels on here
Does anyone gets "Person of Interest" vibe?😁
A true AI is about as realistic as a fusion reactor. Both theoretical but just like the perpetual motion machine. Makes sense on paper but doesn't work in reality.
But perpetual motion machines don't work on paper. There is no theoretical frame work that is taken seriously that would suggest perpetual motion machines are remotely possible.
Oh it's that author again who does not know the plural of "series" is "series", not "serials".
_Galaxy wide copyright strikes is tight!"_