Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Calls BS on Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook | NowThis
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 сер 2024
- ‘Lying is bad’ - Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) left Mark Zuckerberg completely flustered when she pressed him on misinformation in Facebook political ads.
» Subscribe to NowThis: go.nowth.is/New...
» Sign up for our newsletter KnowThis to get the biggest stories of the day delivered straight to your inbox: go.nowth.is/Kn...
In US news and current events today, Democratic party freshman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez grilled Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg about Facebook ads for politicans. Like she did with big pharma and Facebook Libra in the past, AOC presented tough questions. This NowThis News video shows it was one of the most electric congressional hearings in quite some time.
#News #NowThis #NowThisNews
Connect with NowThis
» Like us on Facebook: go.nowth.is/New...
» Tweet us on Twitter: go.nowth.is/New...
» Follow us on Instagram: go.nowth.is/New...
» Find us on Snapchat Discover: go.nowth.is/New...
NowThis is your premier news outlet providing you with all the videos you need to stay up to date on all the latest in trending news. From entertainment to politics, to viral videos and breaking news stories, we’re delivering all you need to know straight to your social feeds. We live where you live.
/ nowthisnews
@nowthisnews
The real question is, why do people go to Facebook to get true, and accurate political information? (Wow thanks for likes everyone!)
They go to have their own opinions circulated and fed back through their ears.
Cause old people don't know how the internet works.
They see it on a screen so it must be real.
@@Leep458 lol sad thing is, lots of young people get their political knowledge from social media as well
@@ezras8889 exactly haha
Exactly,
“Congresswoman, I think lying is bad”😂😂
S Friedman mmkay
He was just putting it in terms that Lexi could understand
South park
Being in our position (where we allow people to lie so we can earn money) on the other hand...
Zuckerberger comes over as remarkably dim. One wonders whether the two brothers who were bought out we're the original brains behind the idea.
"Well, Congresswoman, I think lying is bad.
But, Congresswoman, I think ad revenue is good."
Mark zuckerberg is worth 69bilion yo. Aoc won't have a chance lmao
@@Saiputera Mark Fuckerberg is a lying weasel who was in the tank for Trump in both 2016 and 2020. How much money he has or doesn’t have is irrelevant.
Great to watch a politician actually asking these soulless corporations the questions that we the people would like to ask
@ .... Are u ok? Were u not watching what everyone else was watching. Did u know that the political ads and advertising on television are censored?! It's so we the dumb are not duped! Wtf is happening here....zombies are real people... It's these woke idiots who gargle Trump's testicles.
@@christinad6654 Really now? Political ads on television have to be authorized by a Ministry of Truth before being allowed to air? I wasn't aware of that! All I saw was a corrupt authoritarian socialist trying to use a corporation to silence political opposition. Maybe it's you who needs to watch the video again because if political lies were banned then Democrats would never be able to win another election.
@ oh boy.. let me get this straight.... Your saying that AOC is silencing corporations by having some unknown censorship of political ads. And that's the only way the Democrats are going to win.....except technically the Democrats could pay Facebook to post false claims about the Republicans... So I don't understand your thought process.
Facebook is all just full of lies and they should have to follow the same rules as the candidates websites, emails, tv and newspaper ads. Plan and simple.
@@christinad6654 She is basically telling facebook to take down false political advertisements, which is clear from her line of questioning are all right wing. She is literally trying to curb free speech.
@@subaruyagami2327 So a corporation spreading political misinformation falls under free speech?
It's harder to make yourself look good when the congressperson asking the questions isn't an 80-year-old dinosaur that doesn't understand how the internet even works, huh?
E X A C T L Y
It's harder to not make her look bad... Seriously, you think she made a solid case here?
Zuckerberg is actually right. If Trump promoted his Colorado wall, would you want FB to stop that? The ad would serve as proof that he’s a lying president. If you found out, “FB stops ad of Trump stating he doesn’t know where Colorado is,” you would suddenly say, FB is defending Trump. This is why context matters. Whereas, an incorrect election date isn’t a lie towards a candidate, it’s a lie directly to the FB community, so that would have to be stopped. Racist or violent ads would be as well.
It isn’t black or white, it’s very gray. And that’s why Zuckerberg couldn’t answer.
@@DanielzeGreat Context matters
Mark Arandjus Yes, I know that. But that’s my point. Society needs to learn to NOT trust what’s posted on FB 100% of the time. And a less partisan MSM would really help with that. Reform the media, and FB is a non-issue.
She didn’t even care he was a ceo celebrity and business corporation ceo and director. She just destroyed him like she done with everyone else with only facts
She devoured him
I'm in love!!!!! She really tore him apart.
Not even true.
it's a very complex issue
She all talk no action 😂😂
@@Saiputera Discussion is part of Parliamentary action. She enquired him very well and took the first step.
It is funny to see how nervous Zuck becomes when she's asking him tough questions....
She all talk no action 😂😂
Take a sip of beer everytime he says Congresswoman.
Robert Pinto thanks now I’m drunk 😵👍🏽
He’s just trying to be respectful
our livers will be dead after that
Hes just being respectful
He's being respectful, but I get the point. Every time he knows he's going to slip up on actual agenda, he says that.
I remember “friends” who unfriended me when I called out their post picking on kids who survived a school shooting. I think such lies should be reprimanded.
leahsodyssey123 by the government? You’re part of the problem with our society
@@mysteryman6918 it already is. Slander and libel. It's in the constitution. Read it
How did they pick on the kids?
This OC is exactly why speech platforms (not publishers) should never censor.
That's a terrible thing to do for sure, but there are kids who take advantage of surviving school shootings to further their political agenda
Lying is baaad, wow Suckerberg 😂😂😂 🤦
You forgot to say congresswoman
@@natekankelfitz9735 Zuckerberg was the one who said that so.....
RickySanchez77 Exactly
@@RickySanchez77 delete this.
@Billy M. so asking him why he continues to let shady people and politicians pay him to spread objective lies on his website is dumb? Cool.
The way he says "Congresswoman" makes my skin crawl
I know what you mean. He is such a pompous condescending cretin.
@@robertpinto9217 And yet AOC still comes across as the bigger creep. That's quite an achievement actually.
I know he assumed gender 😱😱😱
DaLagga clown
Me too. The way he says it, you know he doesn't mean it respectfully.
Got destroyed, and exposed within 4 minutes..
“I think probably” “lying is bad” ummm why is his vocabulary that of a fourth graders
Winnie Burckle cus he’s nervous as fck
Reminds me of one of his early days' on stage interview where he was literally profusely sweating.
Because he takes orders from a 5th grader in the White House
He's being asked very difficult questions if you actually think about it.
@@Z3rostar How difficult is it to answer whether you will or will not remove misleading or false ads? You'd be supposed to know answers to such simple questions as owner of the business.
Remember when facebook was just a place to see what your friends are doing?
pepperidge farms does
The news feed used to be in order and ads were not even a thing yet. Such a bait and switch. I hate it now
@ how wonderful!! You have graced me with you're lying presence.
How you doing my conspiracy riddled friend?
@ by all means yes I do have a problem with that! I also have a problem with the president dealing with a country who is very well known of using said private companies to sway and effect an election for his benefit. You wouldnt know anything about that right?
@ lol that's a nice story my friend. It's nice to have make believes and fairytales but sometime you got to live in real life buddy. We talked about biden son. Those are conspiracies that been debunked. Biden son may not be qualified, but anyone could be a board member. Even you! Though I would feel sorry for what ever business that hires you. Also biden didnt interfere with the investigation because there was no investigation into his son. The investigation into the business was done two months after biden son was hired in 2014. He was going after someone who didnt fight corruption. In 2015. The whistleblower had gone through a legal process and had his facts backed up . Its true!! Trump on the other hand whole family has yet to stop getting business dealing, passing laws that will enrich himself and his family, called on multiple countries to investigate his opponents, and sent his attorney to gather evidence under the guise of justice. And we know that because they are literally telling us they did it. Micky his new chief told us so! So glad you got your conspiracy helmet on
@@johnathanjones9684 Sorry buddy, but Biden's son getting a number of high paid positions in foreign countries for which he is not qualified stinks to high heaven and you know it. If it were Trump's son you'd be calling for impeachment on that alone. And if there truly were no investigation, then why is Biden caught on tape bragging about having ended an investigation by threatening to withhold funds? I know, I know, rational thought is hard for a liberal.
As for Trump, we have the transcript and the whole thing has been debunked. The Dems are pushing for impeachment because they're still butt hurt over 2016 but have no other basis for it. First you tried to paint Trump as racist and when that didn't pan out, it was a traitor for the Russians. When that didn't work it was obstruction. And now that the obstruction narrative has collapsed you've grasped onto a new conspiracy theory just as the rug was pulled out from under you. But without any new conspiracy theory to latch on to, you've going to hang on to this one for as long as possible.
The problem with this is that money is involved. Itd be one thing if I just post a lie on Facebook, but it's another thing if I can pay for everyone to see my lie.
IRONIC CONSIDERING "NOW THIS" IS A PRODUCT OF AL-JAZEERA WHICH IS STATE SPONSORED PROPAGANDA OF QATAR. LMAO.
Exactly.
@@artiew8718 after some quick research it actually looks like its owned by Group Nine Media which is a private company from New York, which is subsequently owned by the parent company Discovery, Inc. So no connection to Al Jazeera from what I can tell.
Regardless it doesn't really matter because the initial argument made little sense. Not sure about the caps too, I'd recommend turning them off if you want people to take you seriously.
@@tommy4540 "AJ+" AND "NOWTHIS" ARE THE SAME THING.
Zuckerberg: Please be nice to me
AOC: No... I don't think I will
She all talk no action 😂😂
Yes......he needed that gulp of water after "attempting" to answer AOC's questions.
Honestly anyone would have.
He did answer it right and rewarded himself with a sip of water because the time was over. You maggots twist the truth and are part of your own downfall 🖕🏼
@@Anudorini-Talah What?!...
She all talk no action 😂😂
I love this woman. She's a highly intelligent, classy, outspoken woman that deserves to be where she is, and she deserves to go so much farther.
Would be more classy if she actually let him answer a question and not constantly interrupt.
@@JonnyTuba he wasn't answering her questions, and a Congress member has way more to do than listen to a man try to curve around questions.
@@sardsvib There is a difference between "he is not answering" and "he is not answering what I would like to hear".
@@JonnyTuba she has a small amount of time to ask questions so she didn’t have time to restate and she had to talk fast which made it seem like she didn’t want him to talk. That’s how these go m8.
Her questions were stupid
Asks simple question.
*"??????" and pretends to not be the owner of Facebook*
Dude, what do you want him to *do* add more censorship? Learn to do your own research.
@@dfmrcv862 ya can't get em to listen, they are in an echo chamber
@@SoraldCp Yeah... I try to visit talk to both sides, but even right wing echo chambers have more dialogue than this... sad.
@@dfmrcv862 Even though I think AOC can be an airhead, I still think she raised some important questions. From what I understand, these are political ads that the site alots, not just any post. Misinformation in a democracy is very dangerous and provokes corruption (just take a good look at the current political climate of Latin America). So in this case, I wouldn't use the word censorship, just a reform to their advertisement policy to stop the targeting of the lower class, minorities, and other eligible voters.
@@dreamchaser4845 That sounds like censorship with extra steps.
The government cant tell you what to say same as it cant tell you what to believe, and Facebook isnt a publisher, it is a platform, and as long as people are not using said platform to coordinate physical attacks, there is no need to demand for them to control what *other* people post.
I LOVE how condescending she gets here. The passive aggression is justifiably strong with this one.
@@GabrielDiggs And when she runs, she'll promise an America free of pollution, not an America free of immigrants.
Gabriel Diggs hahaha that’s a great joke. All here speeches and questions she asks are prepared. She isn’t capable of thinking on her own. There’s not enough brain matter upstairs.
@@redsoxs5870 Yet,she's the one that ultimately decides just what she is going to ask. Seems to me that requires a lot more 'brain matter' that you seem to think.
@@redsoxs5870 Because obviously the Greek poet Homer wrote everything in one go off the top of his head, right? Stop watching Hollywood movies; the people we call geniuses are mostly the people who do take care in preparing themselves accordingly, which she did.
John Kelly it’s literally written on a piece of paper for her. All she’s gotta do is read it.
When he says "Congress woman" He really wants to say " Listen woman"
And what led u to that conclusion? Your feminist paranoia??
.. Pathetic w.. Perhaps.
I think he's saying that everrrrrrrryyyyyyy sinnnnnngggggle timmmmmmmmeeeee to annoy every person on the planet, display his arrogance, and buy time to prep what he's gonna say or maybe to fill up the day so the last questions can't be asked. 😂 Quite the circus!
🤣🤣🤣🤣
YEAH HE WAS TRYING TO MANSPLAIN, BOYCOTT FB
I think it would be funny if a group took this to the extreme and made ads that made trump and other key Republicans come across as the most liberal people in politics ever and run them solely to their core demographic.
Let’s do this!
Unfortunately, like most narcissists, they will spin it to their advantage..
The thing that you need to understand about the base of DJ T is wherever he goes they will go. So if DJT all the sudden supports Obamacare and reproductive healthcare rights the base will follow. It’s a cult following that is not anchored in an ideology but instead revolves around a dogmatic affinity to the cult leader whatever he does is correct to them.
@@mrbigpappy85 Well you have to understand why they follow him, becuase he's been the Republican politician supporting the most far right policies in recent history. Maybe they'll switch up on some matters, but their biggest fear is familes of brown people hopping the border and settling here.
@@markiss7620 This could still work. If you make their leaders look like they are leaning far enough to the left, the cult will turn on them. If you do this to anyone that tries to become their leader, the cult will lose track of who to follow, or split their loyalties. That confusion will take power away from them when it's time to vote.
It’s almost like people can’t take responsibility as adults to realize they should always stop and double check information is true, but instead need the government to control it for them.
KrystalwithaY exactly thèse people think that they are the only ones who can tell if something is bad or might not be true like everyone got a brain so its up to them if they wana use it corectly or not
It’s more that you can pay to have your lies spread over a social media platform where people aren’t expecting it - there guard for political misinformation is much lower compared to when actually reading or watching the news and thinking critically. The aim is to desensitise people to lies so that they are more susceptible to it. There’s actually some very interesting research behind it but it’s quite complicated. I’d encourage you to watch Vox’s ‘why obvious lies make great propaganda’ video as it puts its quite simplified but gets the point across. (Yes I know vox has a political bias but the video is pretty accurate of the current situation)
Prince of Chetarria I’ll look that up thank you
Nah.people are easily manipulated and that’s new at all. Propaganda will always use the today means to do it.
This whole thing seems like a staged joke. I mean like a really really bad movie :/
You are correct.
Our lives whether you live in the U.S or not is a joke.
It is only up to us to do well as individuals.
AOC had him by the you know what and kept twisting..
Welcome to the real world...
@Doralingus Memberberries well I would assume they're better then republicans I just find this doesn't seem genuine and maybe people should question if all of what they see IS real
@@kekwayblaze3176 she interrupted him like 23 times lol
Lol when you have a fact checking system that make no sense and make you even confused when someone ask you a question about it
No matter how many times I watch... This never gets old 😆
This is how an elected representative’s job should be done. Bravo!
I swear I saw his "soul" leave his body at one point 😂😂😂 We need more politicians like AOC. She and people like her should be the future of politics. No more moneygrubbing hypocrites who say one thing and do the other.
2:47 “In your ongoing dinner parties with far-right figures, some of whom advance the conspiracy theory that white supremacy is a hoax” 😂😂 LOVE HER 💗
Caught him so off guard, he didn’t even know how to respond to that 😂🤣😂
I trusted stuff on Facebook 😓no wonder im dumb.
Why would you trust fb in the first place ?
Hahahaaaaa...you're not dumb...
Super dumb but now you know better. Time to inform yourself
Hahahahhahahahahaha. I belive everything facebook says.
Go get some books!
Nailed him, that was brutal 😂😂😂
i really pity all those horrible people who feel tingling in their tiny ballsacks and ovaries whenever they see AOC talk so wisely and honestly
Lmao. Fantasy world
She had no coherent or relative questions. Mark was dumbfounded at the lack of understanding she has. It's pretty simple, advertise what you want if it's harmful to others it'll be taken down. Fact checking something isn't the same as removing it based on a potential harm or effect it will have.
So wait shes stunning, brave, wise and honest? The world cant handle such great powers
Asif Mahbub Are u going to be advocating for a $25 minimum wage in the future🤣
@@mwjordan1990 stunning is taking it a little far.
He is literally avoiding answering all her questions! He is ridiculous 😂😂😂
The simple solution is you have to be smarter than the 'news' you're exposed to. What's not so simple is how to get most people to be 'smarter'.
RevQuads the issue is that this isn’t for the people discerning enough to question the content of their news. It’s for FB boomers
It is generally termed "an education". But the US appears to have jettisoned that concept some years ago.
Odd that Zuckerberg reminds me of "Data" from Star Trek, because that's how he got so rich, with *your* *Data* !
"acted so robotic star treks like 'We need lieutenant Data back!" -Elon Musk-Epic Rap Battles of History
She demolished him and facebook's standards......
How so?
It would end his career if he said "woman" only.
Say what you want about her, i freaking love her
What he's trying to say is "There's freedom of speech, and there's making lots of money. I choose the latter in disguise of the former"
This honestly puts Facebook on a very difficult position. We want the internet to be a place, free of moderation from governments but we also need to make sure that misinformation isn't spread out to the public.
This is AOC's false narrative. She doesn't care about how Facebook's posts and ads are governed. She just wants to hit Facebook for being unable to resolve the grey area and dysfunctionality that free speech brings.
I deleted my FB account months ago and I’m glad I did.
Lol he said she could "probably" post an ad that republicans voted for the green new deal.
Cisco Navarro Seriously Facebook do not fact check any advert ..
She was right
How is he supposed to monitor that? Don't believe everything you see on the internet has been a mantra of the internet since pretty much the creation of the internet
Osei Afirim UA-cam does that too though, or at least did. I remember when clash royale came out and I watched some videos about it almost every ad was a scam of a "free gems generator" and I've been getting those for almost a month.
They did and after 24h Facebook took it down.
Look at all these morons begging to be censored. Fields. And fields. Of morons.
I'm so relieved that Mark Zuckerberg thinks "Lying is bad". That's the kind of upstanding American we need in times like these. Now, if only he could answer a simple yes/no question, that would really knock it out of the park.
I'm so blessed I have no social media
Then how are we communicating?
You're are on social media
UA-cam is a social media platform
gangster moon I hear you. YT is one of the only places I don't feel vulnerable making posts (that and an occasional letters-to-the-editor entry at one or another of the newspapers/periodicals). I don't want anything like the volume of messaging people get on FB/Twitter. Nobody's directly approached me on YT with a false ad for a product or political agenda. I've never had an account of the sort that makes a person open to that level of targeting.
This IS social media. 😁 NEWSFLASH;
They are all run by the same people 🤦🏽♀️🤦🏾♀️🤦🏻♀️🤦🏼♀️
Why is she interrupting him all the time? In such a serious discussion, everybody should have the right to say what they want to say without being interrupted after 5 words...
She has five minutes and he is dodging answers to simple questions.
Because he couldn't answer yes or no questions 🤷♂️
She's not that great ,she asked him thing he was not prepared for,he was there for other matters.
I get what Mark is saying, but most people won’t research whether an ad they’re seeing is a lie or truth. Just saying, most people will only read the headline or first line of a story. If it is “Hilary is a liar,” or “Trump loves Nancy Pelosi.” That’s what people will most like only read and believe. Lol.
Political Ads are one of the ads that required to be reviewed. Taking down lies on political ads are the as taking down Fake supplement that claim to cure cancer.
It's both lies.
I think you're misunderstanding his intentions, they won't remove ads that come from politicians but they'll give them a mark saying that the ad is fake news, at least that's what i understood
BlackStar 458 🤔 I don’t think so. He’s pretty much saying he doesn’t believe that Fb should be held accountable for what Politicians’s ad, even if they’re false. He doesn’t say that Fb will even flag the ad as a lie. The only thing Fb will do is take down ads or content that “is calling for violence, or could risk imminent physical harm, or voter or census suppression.” Mark is pretty much saying if the ad is a lie, then the people should see for theirselves that that person is lying and spreading misinformation or whatever. That being said, like I said most people will not research whether what they read is true or false. That’s what happened in the 2016 election and in everyday life in general. Many people will believe what they read is true. Most people are not thinking about who is the source? what is the source’s objective? Is this a reliable source? Do they have evidence to back up what has been stated?
Bren Hates Not at all. All I’m saying is most people won’t research what they consume. Because they believe in their sources.
Ok, I'm for both sides. She did ask good questions, but she Also didn't let him answer correctly and would cut him off. All these politicians ask a lot of yes or no question, the fact of the matter is that these questions are not just yes or no. He stated if the content is pushing hate or any immediate danger they will take it down, but if it's just hear say they won't. He also tried to explain that it depends on the post if it's an organic post ( not an ad) they won't take it down, because they are untitled to say what they want to say and Facebook would look bad taking post down. Now it's different if you're paying for ads. Also with targeting specific demographics, Facebook has done alot of changes where you can't target that specifically. I run Facebook ads for many businesses and see that they don't. Also with the white supremacy questions, he literally answered it saying they don't choose the fact checkers and it is chooses by an independent organization. But she goes ahead and blames him. Now to end it, Facebook is an option you have the option to go on and go off. If you don't like what you see get off. I understand some stuff is misleading and they do try at points to mitugate that, but the idea of a government trying to shut down a company for stuff like this is more scary than Facebook trying to stay a business.
Um they all have time limits on questions being asked..... He clearly didn't have an answer, so she moved on. He could have asked the chair for a second to answer the question.
@Norma Bogle what question are you referring to exactly?
@@queenshay what question Re you referring to? I mentioned a couple and it's hard to Answer the question when the person asking it know hardly anything about how the platform works.
I think you made a very good point. Most of the questions arent simple yes or no. But have to actually be explained, also seeing as facebook is used by millions, posts and ads are added probably millions per second. Thats hard to keep up and track every single thing. As in anything else could do they better sure but at the sametime people need to do their own research on matters to see if it actually is real or seemingly "fake news". This just seems like another case or people blaming a platform rather than being accountable for their actions, since its an easier target.
The only time i see Congress member ask the right questions
cute🙌
I feel like that when I have to answer about a function I didn't write.... wait, hold on, perhaps he didn't write Facebook to begin with... 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Wow, it got a little quiet there for a bit then that blank stare on his face was priceless !
She is amazing! ❤️
She OWEND him... the lizard man was left speechless!! We love to see it
Why does he have to keep saying congress women, just another reason why I don’t use Facebook anymore
To burn time, even if only a little each time, might shave off a whole question.
Well if you were in his position you might get why he is,you can't adresse her as women or nothing it has to do with respect and the picture of him self he's giving. and if this is a reason why you stoped using faceboolk then you woulden't understand anything that is hapening.
"I'm a liberal billionaire, these colored people are supposed to love me." - Mark Zuckerberg
People still use Facebook? That's like the AOL of social media.
A lot of people still use Facebook. I don't know anyone that doesn't.
mainly people use facebook to communicate and stuff, while popularity has fallen to insta
I love her ❤️
Thank god there’s people like her 👍
Zuckerberg can’t afford a recycled and recyclable bottle? Case heard and dismissed.
It’s really about controlling messages. The government would love to be able to regulate what is truth and what isn’t.
He makes me want to scream
@Garrett I suggest you see the reality of things. Zuckerberg's performance here should make any sane person squirm.
The title should be “AI Breaks After Being Asked Hard Questions”
These questions weren't hard, they were childish. This is like a kid asking their parents why they can't just go to the atm and get money if they have no money. Wasn't Edward Snowden a hero for whistleblowing the invasive surveillance programs that the NSA had in place? Now things didn't go in your favor so it's not only ok but Facebook's inherent responsibility to monitor the conversations of all of its members and make sure it falls in line with an accepted political narrative?
Her questions are so on point.
"If u can answer yes, no, maybe, can't and we do." Her questions were commie style, you're wrong no matter what and if you want her to rephrase, she'll say ' let's move on
," to make it seem like he's trying to dodge an answer but he's trying to understand the question. Stupid questions deserve stupid answers and gibberish sentences deserve a " wtf do you mean?!" She can't rephrase the question coz she's simply reading her script her handler gave her.
Can you please rephrase what she said in English please? Since you seem to think you understand. Thanks in advance.
@@miameow4833 are you triggered?
but her style of asking questions is not, otherwise she would have let him speak more than 5 words without interrupting him.
She had him fumbling over his own words... it becomes difficult to shield yourself behind intelligence when the basis of your operation is in the realm of miscreance.
What a WOMAN! A PROPER POLITICIAN ASKING THE APPROPRIATE QUESTIONS.
GO CORTEZ!
*Then why allowed the fake news to posted and instead fact-checking first before allowing the news to posted? 🤷♀️*
Lying only bad when it's not a republican spewing it out his mouth
What?
Uhm...can you try that again but in English? Also she even said herself 'would I be allowed lie?' to show it isn't just Republicans that could take advantage of this system.
@shakey balls
Ikr they are quick to shut us up
not even American. But i want her running Australia
nope
He is so nervous to not get cornered by his previous lies, I'd bet he's got water spraying down the top of his pants!
Her AGENDA is not to stop “ lying ads” !! She wants “ FACT CHECKING “ as a way to CENSOR republic or conservative ads !! That’s her MOTIVE I believe ! She tries to say “ lying ads” so she wants that anyone who doesn’t agree with her policy should be labeled as “ lie” and get censored by “ fact checking “
He isn't human... Lizard for sure
Her questions aren't smart and he is not in a position to speak freely. The real question is why these dog and pony shows take place at all. She "grilled" him... so what are the consequences? There are none. The Zuck goes home and makes another billion. Ridiculous!
I wonder if she is talking about dems lies
dems are not right-wing people goofy
Chayzee Puffz someone’s been in the Fox News freezer too long!
Why does this guy creep me out?😑
Wow these two are perfect for each other ❤️😍❤️
Lol
they are lol
You are always incredible person
AOC doesn't seem to understand how much data flow happens. Congress is pathetic
Watch out people..
Eminem and mark zuckerberg are the same person.😂😂😂
Looks like his got some kind of earpiece ,someone telling him what to say...
All the more reason to never use Facebook.
the musical Raeve / That´s for sure! Let them burn!
Mad props to Cortez for her dumb questions and all the other millions of idiots who think Facebook is a source for news. Claps. Good job in ruining Facebook.
She is GOOOOOOOD!!!!
This is way too spliced and edited to give any fair impression of what Zuckerberg had to say. He could have derailed his own testimony if she hadn't interrupted him so many times, just saying. Not a fan of Zuckerberg by any means but AOC has a lot to learn about interrogating a witness; especially a well prepared witness who also happens to be a genius. To get anything out of this, skip biased video editors and go to the full testimony. The problems with Facebook are deeper than this surface level treatment.
Why can’t people just fact check, and get news from actual news sources🙄
He must be smitten by her beauty.
Congress women doesn't understand her own questions.
AOC made data from star trek malfunction, @3:39 you can actually hear and see Zuckerberg's circuits fry trying to answer that question🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣. And can someone please make the windows.exe not working meme with Zuckerberg's face how it froze @3:39.
unless ur having trouble using ur own brain cells to "fact check" an ad or politician, what is the point of this?
The majority of the people on Facebook are too lazy to fact check what they repost on Facebook.
Good job AOC !
Love you. ❤️
FOR ALL YOU HATERS. Both of them made a valid case. AOC pushed a bit too far, but we do need to fact check certain political ads at a certain threshold. Meanwhile, Mark is in a hard position because, censorship is a hard thing, especially with politics in a free country. Too much will cause uproar, and too little is dangerous. Please understand that these two are talking about a serious and difficult issue. I don't care if you are Republican or Democratic, put yourself in their shoes.
"Will you let me censor free speech on your platform if I disagree with it? Yes or no"
Why are you on Facebook? It's free and they are taking us for a ride..I love AOC for hear bold and direct questions, a true way government and officials should be to hold up the law for all including the less informed, weak and poor.
BRAVO....... THE PEOPLE OF THE WORLD SHOULD THANK HER FOR EXISTING....... PERIOD.
Wait, she asked if she could run ads with a blatant lie targeting Republicans and his answer was... YES?! Dude wtf!
I know he tried to justify it by saying the constituents would be able to see if they lied, but within that time frame it would cause too much damage to say it could be corrected quickly 😟
But who is still using Facebook thou...
Sgt Cake wdym? Do you live under a rock?
Literally almost everybody...
delete your facebook and instagram - if you still have one. start using "telegram" instead of whatsapp - we need to dethrone that jerk
What an incompetent human
„Congresswomen“ 🤮
She’s a modern day super HERO 🦸♀️ she’s coming for all you
You're deluded
@Ronald Reagan the outward message is important their all gonna have their hands in the bag but you or I aren’t doing it and until we remove donations from politics we only have so much to work with as far as evil and good
This woman is so depressing
Yet they keep banning me from joining fb. I wonder why?
Politicians vs. Lies = fuel vs. Fire