Supreme Court limits affirmative action in college admissions

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 чер 2024
  • The Supreme Court has struck down two cases on affirmative action policies in college admissions from the University of North Carolina and Harvard University. TODAY's Savannah Guthrie and senior legal correspondent Laura Jarrett break down the decision.
    » Subscribe to TODAY: on.today.com/SubscribeToTODAY
    » Watch the latest from TODAY: bit.ly/LatestTODAY
    About: TODAY brings you the latest headlines and expert tips on money, health and parenting. We wake up every morning to give you and your family all you need to start your day. If it matters to you, it matters to us. We are in the people business. Subscribe to our channel for exclusive TODAY archival footage & our original web series.
    Connect with TODAY Online!
    Visit TODAY's Website: on.today.com/ReadTODAY
    Find TODAY on Facebook: on.today.com/LikeTODAY
    Follow TODAY on Twitter: on.today.com/FollowTODAY
    Follow TODAY on Instagram: on.today.com/InstaTODAY
    » Stream TODAY All Day: www.today.com/allday
    About: TODAY All Day is a 24/7 streaming channel bringing you the top stories in news and pop culture, celebrity interviews, cooking, and more. All in one place.
    #scotus #breakingnews #college

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,1 тис.

  • @Pod6168
    @Pod6168 Рік тому +299

    Racial bias is unconstitutional. Imagine that.

    • @ogrehaslayers605
      @ogrehaslayers605 Рік тому

      Exactly!
      Notice how the racists are out in force, blabbering on about how it was "meant to counter racism" though?
      They will defend their racist and segregation ways under the guise of being "woke" and "benevolent".
      Glad the Supreme Court finally got rid of it. 💪

    • @Noosejustice
      @Noosejustice Рік тому +3

      Utube is doing it on this platform. They only want people to know what they want them to know. Doesn't matter if it's truth or not.

    • @Tayl-top
      @Tayl-top Рік тому +3

      Well, go argue with the actual constitution then. As Justice KBJ pointed out; the constitution didn't intend to be race-blind. Just read up the 14th amendment. Period.

    • @ogrehaslayers605
      @ogrehaslayers605 Рік тому +17

      @@Tayl-top she was the Justice who got her education based on her race and gender , then she got her job based on her race and gender... Merit isn't her virtue. Of course she disagreed 😂

    • @1212CSmith
      @1212CSmith Рік тому +6

      There is bias in student-athlete applicants and legacy applicants. The court must do away with those.

  • @yindao2830
    @yindao2830 Рік тому +66

    Does this mean asians will no longer be discriminated against in regards to having equal entrance standards? As of yesterday at least, asians(because it based on race) had to score higher than anyone else to be on an equal platform. Lumping all asians together.

    • @0doublezero0
      @0doublezero0 Рік тому +3

      Yes, this court case stemmed from the Harvard vs. Asians battle. The Asians won.

    • @miamitten1123
      @miamitten1123 Рік тому +1

      What happens when asians still get reduced entry. Then what will be the excuse? I just cannot imagine a university wanting a majority East Asian population on their campus. Whites will intentionally segregate

  • @CourageUnderFire87
    @CourageUnderFire87 Рік тому +50

    If race doesn’t matter then that should stop asking about race on job and college applications!

    • @blackrose8418
      @blackrose8418 Рік тому +1

      I always assumed filling out your race on those applications was just like general I formation, like what's your name, what's your age, what's your date of birth kind of stuff

    • @DawnSchmeltz
      @DawnSchmeltz Рік тому

      I'm white and afraid to put my race on an application.. It could exclude me from getting jobs even if I'm qualified.

    • @StockyDude
      @StockyDude Рік тому +1

      You actually don’t have to answer that question on those applications.

  • @brightstarsbydanasummons9438
    @brightstarsbydanasummons9438 Рік тому +153

    You all call me a "black" man from Baltimore. I call myself a man from Baltimore. What's wrong with that?

    • @Nate-dn1gx
      @Nate-dn1gx Рік тому +20

      Correction, they call you call a "Black" man because they think all black people have the same experience

    • @birdlynn417
      @birdlynn417 Рік тому

      Exactly. End racism, Biden and the left don't see us as equals, but keep offending races of other color all the time.

    • @roselawrence56
      @roselawrence56 Рік тому

      Nothing but a man named Edward Blum used Asians to push this lawsuit.

    • @shlepmessing8703
      @shlepmessing8703 Рік тому

      That's not acceptable to democrats. You're not playing along.

    • @SubParPilot
      @SubParPilot Рік тому

      Both statements would be correct

  • @RoninIV_unleashed
    @RoninIV_unleashed Рік тому +139

    "Deeply divided court"? It was a 6 to 3 decision. That's not deeply divided.

    • @chejlr
      @chejlr Рік тому +12

      Yes, all the conservatives were for it and liberals against. Thats divided.

    • @ordinaryman1904
      @ordinaryman1904 Рік тому +14

      Using the term “deeply divided” is an attempt to undermine the Court.
      Any decision that is not unanimous could be called ‘deeply divided’

    • @joeyharper4976
      @joeyharper4976 Рік тому

      ​@@chejlrLiberals are clearly the racists... While ironically labeling everyone else "Racist".

    • @theagent3
      @theagent3 Рік тому

      Deeply Divided is a liberal statement to undermined the Rule of Law.

    • @usdepartmentofthetreasury489
      @usdepartmentofthetreasury489 Рік тому +1

      @@chejlrso? It’s not a race or a test given how many seats you have! If you don’t like democracy go to Venezuela or Cuba bernie says it’s paradise

  • @croweater1
    @croweater1 Рік тому +227

    Discrimination was not OK back then and it is not OK now. Thank you Supreme Court.

    • @ServingVibes
      @ServingVibes Рік тому +15

      I do think it was needed back in the day but absolutely not anymore.

    • @ServingVibes
      @ServingVibes Рік тому

      I agree with you. Many Asians have not made it in university, that’s done better than others, bc they already check-marked how many can be there.

    • @MrBassbump
      @MrBassbump Рік тому +7

      @@ServingVibes I agree, and I also glad that they finally removed this clause.

    • @johnnytofil6187
      @johnnytofil6187 Рік тому +7

      Now that the shoe is on the other foot.I hear so much crying 😭 The same law that protected them Is telling them to be smart.

    • @Ljounieh
      @Ljounieh Рік тому +2

      Right, and there were no social historical consequences from that period right

  • @ontariofirs7347
    @ontariofirs7347 Рік тому +185

    Im Filipino and this is great. Everyone regardless of their skin colour or background should be held at the same standards.

    • @Ljounieh
      @Ljounieh Рік тому

      When you come from a country where thr blacks were enslaved maybe you'll see the point

    • @erauprcwa
      @erauprcwa Рік тому

      White women benefit the most from it.

    • @elizabethortiz152
      @elizabethortiz152 Рік тому +12

      Holding everyone to the same standard would insinuate that everyone has had the same resources, privileges, and opportunities whether economically, politically and/or socially. It negates the fact that underrepresented communities have been historically marginalized and currently suffer from systemic disadvantages and obstacles that remain pervasive due to historical racist policies,practices, and perspectives. Since you’re on a train to making college admissions equal among everyone maybe you can fight to abolish nepotism or wealth privilege next 🙄

    • @lc6636
      @lc6636 Рік тому +27

      @@elizabethortiz152You don't need anything but books and a library to be smart.

    • @lugcastillo
      @lugcastillo Рік тому +3

      You know for a fact that nobody is held to the same standards!

  • @willieboy3011
    @willieboy3011 Рік тому +233

    In a 6-3 decision announced on Thursday, the justices ruled that the use of race as a factor in college admissions was a violation of the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. Case settled. Racial discrimination is wrong. This should have been ended long ago. Merit and performance should be the guidepost, not skin color.

    • @TrayMillsOfficial
      @TrayMillsOfficial Рік тому +9

      Why didn’t they remove gender discrimination too then?

    • @TrayMillsOfficial
      @TrayMillsOfficial Рік тому +14

      They should be merit based and not gender affirmative either then

    • @michael-hw1uv
      @michael-hw1uv Рік тому

      Thomas Sowell's, the origins of Woke,1995. Black conservative's. The most hated group in Leftist political thought. Affirmative Action, another fine work of communism. And Today empowers it further. Sad day at the office.

    • @zacharybosley1935
      @zacharybosley1935 Рік тому

      This is a decision that demands once again that black people work 4x harder in low-income neighborhoods to get a sliver of a shot at an ivy league university.
      Without policies to reinforce the education of people in our ghettos and hoods, this is only another gate inhibiting people from accessing any upward social mobility.

    • @willieboy3011
      @willieboy3011 Рік тому +15

      @@TrayMillsOfficial That was not the issue before the court.

  • @philiplam2084
    @philiplam2084 Рік тому +189

    Hopefully this provides incentive to fix K-12 education. Affirmative Action in college admissions was like putting a band-aid on a broken leg...

    • @pennytrue2741
      @pennytrue2741 Рік тому +7

      Amen.

    • @nima6080
      @nima6080 Рік тому +15

      Dude, I can’t agree more. Some inner cities’ kids are illiterate.

    • @Noosejustice
      @Noosejustice Рік тому +10

      Diversity breeds mediocrity

    • @pennytrue2741
      @pennytrue2741 Рік тому

      @@Noosejustice disgusting statement

    • @movekeysdapianoman
      @movekeysdapianoman Рік тому +14

      Ah now I understand what Make America Great Again means returning to Jim Crow.

  • @jasonh9696
    @jasonh9696 Рік тому +253

    Imagine being mad because you actually have to qualify like everyone else. Lol.

    • @nunook5522
      @nunook5522 Рік тому +13

      @jasonh9696 The curriculum for the more prestigious schools and the under served schools has a huge gap. It hasn't been fair since kindergarten. Start there and the playing field can be equal.

    • @ifeetz7612
      @ifeetz7612 Рік тому

      @@nunook5522 Shut your woke mouth! If you truly want to end racism, NO MORE PRIVILEGES BASED ON RACE!

    • @ifeetz7612
      @ifeetz7612 Рік тому +31

      @@nunook5522 Also, tell us about reparations! Tell us why, people who never owned slaves need to give our money to others who were NEVER SLAVES?

    • @gloreymi
      @gloreymi Рік тому

      Yea well when your not white you don’t qualify see how that feels

    • @adrienneburrows3490
      @adrienneburrows3490 Рік тому +3

      Years of institutional racism hasn't necessarily leveled the playing field either. Power should be earned, not given. The talented tenth will continue to rise despite this court decision. Some people will just have to compete with others who will benefit from the reverse racism designed to sustain them.

  • @kurtcameron723
    @kurtcameron723 Рік тому +134

    A great day for Truth, Justice and The American Way.......No Discrimination!!!!!!

    • @parnellspeed5755
      @parnellspeed5755 Рік тому +8

      The American way is truth, justice, and no discrimination?...Since when?

    • @michael-hw1uv
      @michael-hw1uv Рік тому

      Thomas Sowell's, the origins of Woke,1995. Black conservative's. The most hated group in Leftist political thought. Affirmative Action, another fine work of communism. And Today empowers it further. Sad day at the office.

    • @SwiftJustice
      @SwiftJustice Рік тому

      Supreme KKKourt serves the undead Confederacy, not America.

    • @thrummer1953
      @thrummer1953 Рік тому +6

      @@parnellspeed5755 Those are our Ideals. Good ones too.

    • @parnellspeed5755
      @parnellspeed5755 Рік тому +7

      @@thrummer1953 Ideals, no matter how great they seem in writing, are only as good as the application of said ideals. The track record of United States in living up to those ideals for all it's people is poor at best. And currently it's in a retrograde direction.

  • @JesusOurSavior7777
    @JesusOurSavior7777 Рік тому +139

    Those who claim to be against “systemic racism” are upset that the only systemically racist policy still on the books has ended. You can’t make this stuff up. Incredible.

    • @adrienneburrows3490
      @adrienneburrows3490 Рік тому +2

      1619, Tulsa, Jim Crow, the Cress Theory, James Crow Jr . Esquire.....

    • @JesusOurSavior7777
      @JesusOurSavior7777 Рік тому

      @@adrienneburrows3490 All of which has been recognized as the evil that it is. Can you give any examples of systemic racism within say the last 20 years? You have you go back 60-100 years to name other cases of systematic racism that isn’t affirmative action.

    • @TrayMillsOfficial
      @TrayMillsOfficial Рік тому

      Just like those who claim to be against systemic gender discrimination yet they want to use gender for affirmative action in universities right?

    • @user-me1mv4vy9q
      @user-me1mv4vy9q Рік тому

      F

    • @user-zq4fv8sj6v
      @user-zq4fv8sj6v Рік тому +11

      @@adrienneburrows3490To think that yt voted for Biden after his ‘94 crime bill and personal statement of “not wanting his children to grow up in a RACIAL JUNGLE” 😂😂😂😂😂

  • @mikethaison432
    @mikethaison432 Рік тому +113

    Wow, It actually took them 30 years to realize taking out your anger on white and asian kids is childish and unacceptable.

    • @nunook5522
      @nunook5522 Рік тому +10

      @mikethaison432 The policy of affirmative action dates to the Reconstruction Era in the United States, 1863-1877. Current policy was introduced in the early 1960s in the United States, as a way to combat racial discrimination in the hiring process, with the concept later expanded to address gender discrimination. See any hatred in that statement?

    • @MsCaramello73
      @MsCaramello73 Рік тому

      Anger? What college did you attend? They didn't teach you squat about history. Minorities, not just Blacks and Latinos(as), have been systemically and historically denied access to universities, especially the Ivy League. That's why there are HBCUs because we had to build our own universities to get a higher education. The inequality in the system starts at elementary school in public schools that are still segregated and underfunded. It's not anger to consider a students race for admissions. It's repairing a systemic problem that has existed for decades. Also, white women benefit the most from Affirmative Action programs. Also, there are white kids who get admitted because their parents and/or parents went to the University. Why aren't low-income Whites and Asians mad about that? It's because you can't scapegoat Black people for not getting in if you actually knew the truth, or understood why AA exists in the first place.

    • @mikethaison432
      @mikethaison432 Рік тому +18

      @@nunook5522 O I see my mistake. They were actually taking out their insecurities on asian and white kids for over 60 years. Thanks for clearing that up.
      Clearly the solution to discrimination is equality of opportunity, not using the same barbaric logic in a reversed fashion.

    • @timorthelame1
      @timorthelame1 Рік тому +7

      @@mikethaison432 nunook is really upset about this more level playing field, as illustrated by his replies up and down the entire comment section on this post. You have to wonder why someone would be so bitter or ignorant as to take issue with fairness but some people can't help but show off their racism.

    • @SoupBone-bp1qk
      @SoupBone-bp1qk Рік тому

      No one was taking anything out on White or Asian kids. Asians allowed Whites to use them as wedge puppets to get rid of something that tried to make the playing field level for everyone. Everyone who got in to a specific college or university earned their right to be there. The Asian young man was denied by at least 6 colleges/universities but it wasn't due to Black people somehow taking his place. He was not a well rounded student.

  • @rugged9769
    @rugged9769 Рік тому +22

    It’s not “limit”, it’s “strike down”, like AP calls it

    • @bigbearhugebear9018
      @bigbearhugebear9018 Рік тому

      Yep . but they won't come back and make correction

    • @frostriver4547
      @frostriver4547 Рік тому +3

      It’s strikes down real institutional racism

    • @juniornisthal2216
      @juniornisthal2216 Рік тому

      It’s not struck down. The Majority even mentions that race can still be used… maybe read it before speaking?

    • @jaquaveonandress649
      @jaquaveonandress649 Рік тому

      Im glad it’s limited and completed gone. I feel everyone should at least have a good chance at getting in

  • @ogrehaslayers605
    @ogrehaslayers605 Рік тому +125

    About time! I've been explaining to people for decades that "affirmative action" is racist and sexist. We finally got some people in power, backing it up.
    No more segregation. No more handing out degrees to people that didn't earn them. 💪

    • @nunook5522
      @nunook5522 Рік тому +17

      @ogrehaslayer605 Ask yourself why it was necessary to begin with.

    • @ogrehaslayers605
      @ogrehaslayers605 Рік тому +16

      @@nunook5522 ask yourself why you would support racism and segregation 🤷‍♂️

    • @Shailix
      @Shailix Рік тому

      @@nunook5522robably because minorities with 1.9 GPAs were crying that they weren’t getting into college and they blamed it on race… you don’t see Asians crying about AA being overturned because they know that if they have better grades they will get into any college they want

    • @pjincho
      @pjincho Рік тому +4

      @@ogrehaslayers605have u ever researched the nuances on the issue?

    • @nunook5522
      @nunook5522 Рік тому +4

      @@ogrehaslayers605 I wouldn't, but you can ask the racists and segregationists that have been in existence since before I was born. But they are why AA came into existence.
      The policy of affirmative action dates to the Reconstruction Era in the United States, 1863-1877. Current policy was introduced in the early 1960s in the United States, as a way to combat racial discrimination in the hiring process, with the concept later expanded to address gender discrimination.

  • @CharlesDarwinBarkley
    @CharlesDarwinBarkley Рік тому +33

    Great decision!! Now you actually have to rely on hardwork and good grades to get in.. That's how it should be..

    • @kingkem_113
      @kingkem_113 Рік тому

      So white and Asians who have the best scores should be on top. Indirectly saying white an Asians should be the dominant race !

    • @michael-hw1uv
      @michael-hw1uv Рік тому

      Thomas Sowell's, the origins of Woke,1995. Black conservative's. The most hated group in Leftist political thought. Affirmative Action, another fine work of communism. And Today empowers it further. Sad day at the office.

    • @duanemilton8149
      @duanemilton8149 Рік тому +1

      bs

    • @theagent3
      @theagent3 Рік тому +4

      @@kingkem_113 You said it, not whites nor asians.

    • @brotherbig4651
      @brotherbig4651 Рік тому +5

      @@kingkem_113If they are better at study, why not? They earn the position.

  • @zeyjin8852
    @zeyjin8852 Рік тому +39

    Only the unearned will be sad to see this verdict

    • @erauprcwa
      @erauprcwa Рік тому

      Who benefits the most from Affirmative Action

    • @thomashsiai6250
      @thomashsiai6250 Рік тому

      @@erauprcwaUhhhh
      People with very good academic scores are most benefited.
      Now here comes the question: ‘What race most benefits from this’
      Asian people.
      They are a micro-minority compared to white, black, Hispanic, etc yet are extremely present academically. It’s part of the culture.

    • @zeyjin8852
      @zeyjin8852 Рік тому

      @thomashsiai6250 I don't know if it is difficult for some races to check the average gpa, comprehensive academic performance and student proportion of different races among previously admitted students.
      If you looked it up you wouldn't say Asians benefit XD

    • @zeyjin8852
      @zeyjin8852 Рік тому

      @thomashsiai6250 In my high school, a student of a certain race with a gpa of 3.4 wants to apply to Harvard. According to him, the reason is: because Harvard has admission preferences for this race.
      I can't remember what race he is, probably southeast asian because he's very dark skinned lol.

    • @alainbao3762
      @alainbao3762 Рік тому

      Asian people extremely study hard - they will all get to big school - no more races for college entrance

  • @drone_boss
    @drone_boss Рік тому +39

    Superior Merit Wins!

    • @BudSilverado420
      @BudSilverado420 Рік тому +1

      I agree Asian,White,Hispanic, Black in that order is how it usually goes. As a Hispanic man myself I know I can't compete with Asians and whites academically but I don't cry about it.

    • @drone_boss
      @drone_boss Рік тому

      @@BudSilverado420 I feel the same. I have been outperformed on s standardized test and didn’t complain.

    • @frostriver4547
      @frostriver4547 Рік тому

      Institutional racism strikes down

  • @teresia748
    @teresia748 Рік тому +47

    Great concept You have to EARN the opportunity not have it handed to you because of your race. Which was limiting opportunities for other’s races

    • @SoupBone-bp1qk
      @SoupBone-bp1qk Рік тому

      Which was why Affirmative Action was put in place to begin with. Whites were not interested in having a level playing field and fixed the game for their children before anyone else's child could start playing. I don't hear anyone talking that hard about those Legacy admissions (overwhelmingly White). Those take away places from rightfully deserving students only because a child's parents or grands etc went to the school. A sub-set of Asians allowed themselves to be used as puppets by their White puppet masters but it still won't go well for them.

    • @randomtees
      @randomtees Рік тому

      It was only limiting opportunities for one race: Asians.

    • @kingkem_113
      @kingkem_113 Рік тому

      Like who ?! Arabic’s whites and Asians they have the most opportunities

    • @Iarenzo
      @Iarenzo Рік тому +1

      …… oh brother

    • @erauprcwa
      @erauprcwa Рік тому

      You do realize that white women benefitted the most from Affirmative Action?

  • @Super-mr4yn
    @Super-mr4yn Рік тому +52

    good. I was rejected by Harvard despite being valedictorian and having amazing extracurriculars (international level sports, etc), yet I was accepted into the other 6 ivies I applied to (didnt apply to Dartmouth). however, my 4 black classmates who didnt have nearly as great stats at all were accepted and currently attending Harvard. while I cant prove that the only reason I was rejected was because of my race, I can say with strong confidence that Harvard admissions is rigged and the best of the best dont truly end up going to Harvard. I rlly strongly believe that Harvard is extremely overrated and other elite schools have better programs (I also dont want to discredit anyone who's going to Harvard because it still does take a lot of hard work to get in)

    • @chrisk2734
      @chrisk2734 Рік тому +12

      Consider you were rejected because there wasn't enough seats. You know hundreds of people apply to Harvard, stop it. Also, legacy students took your seat, there was a report that almost 30% of incoming freshman were legacy.

    • @chantzchantz6939
      @chantzchantz6939 Рік тому

      In 20 Years no one will be allowed to put race or gender on any application..Loan Schools Jobs ECT....

    • @Super-mr4yn
      @Super-mr4yn Рік тому +4

      @@chrisk2734 I dont think u understood what I said at all bc I understand its super hard to get accepted. but considering I got into Columbia, Princeton, Yale, brown, Cornell, and upenn (and also Stanford the next day as well as every other t10), but not Harvard, yet my black friends got in with much lower test scores and gpas, that says something. so in fact, u should stop it bc ur obviously ignoring the obvious evidence.
      but I do 100% agree with the legacy admissions bc I had two friends with grandfathers on the board of trustees at Harvard who got in despite having around a 3.3-3.4 gpa. Im pretty sure theres a Supreme Court case about the legacy admissions at Harvard as well. also, had I gotten into Harvard, I wouldnt have attended bc my school is the best school for medicine (which is what im studying), and I have loads of opportunities here... not that I wouldn't have not gotten that at Harvard, but I feel like im happier at my school that I would've been at Harvard... so im not salty

    • @simoncohen9323
      @simoncohen9323 Рік тому

      ​@@chrisk2734false Harvard and other colleges even admit they decline non African Americans so they can meet the racist quotas

    • @Retributivist
      @Retributivist Рік тому +2

      The world is full of complexities. Affirmative action is an attempt to rectify the disadvantages of groups of people who have suffered from intergenerational poverty and give them a chance at success. So yes, it means those who meet that criterion are favored, despite lower stats. Is it fair for you? No. Was it fair that you were likely born into a family with enough resources to support your ability to perform well academically, afford elite schools, etc. (not downplaying your hard work, making a point)? The answer may vary, depending on who you ask. Perhaps you don't come from a privileged family, but statistically, that would be less likely than the chance those people you assume were accepted based on race came from less privileged families. If you truly are, the "best of the best", you should have no issue killing it at any ELITE school of your choice, (a privilege most will never have in and of itself) though you may not be able to attend your first choice, sad to say. It is ultimately a sacrifice made for the greater good. And since Harvard doesn't appear to be your school of choice anyway, you are doing quite well. With this ruling, however, the same privileged people will continue to have advantages and share them with their children and so forth, which is unfortunately, nothing new.

  • @gwenbates4456
    @gwenbates4456 Рік тому +21

    So we should also remove "Legacy " (I believe is what it's called?)! Just because your parent(s) went to a particular college SHOULD NOT assure your acceptance!!!😮
    **UPDATE ** Just read news feed that Dems are going after Legacy! If Supreme Court upholds Legacy that would definitely be a double standard! Each individual qualify on their own merits.

    • @dawidmalan8727
      @dawidmalan8727 Рік тому +2

      I disagree. I think if a parent worked very hard to get into a college, their children should be admitted at higher rates.

    • @SeaTurtle515
      @SeaTurtle515 Рік тому +3

      Yes, that’s what I’ve been telling people that Legacy is no different. My kids could have easier admission to USC because of the Legacy program.

    • @gwenbates4456
      @gwenbates4456 Рік тому +1

      @dawidmalan8727 Nope!! No difference and everyone qualifies on "their" own merits! Can't have your cake and eat it to!!! Child can work hard like parent(s)...

    • @dawidmalan8727
      @dawidmalan8727 Рік тому

      @@gwenbates4456 Practically tho, alumni relations are important and legacy strengthens alumni relations.

    • @gwenbates4456
      @gwenbates4456 Рік тому

      @dawidmalan8727 I appreciate what you're saying...but there is nothing practical about years of laws to help people being overturned in the workplace, colleges, schools, etc! If anything it may cause more segregation because blacks might possibly choose HBCUs rather than deal with this foolishness 🤔. More separation....but it appears that's what they're after! Just look at TN and the 80 some odd acres purchased by white nationalists and blacks and LGBT are not allowed! But it's all good! God will set things right on Judgement Day!

  • @AcePlay1000
    @AcePlay1000 Рік тому +39

    How about we start discussing how so many upper middle/high class families are sending kids to prestigious institutions because of outrageous donations and family legacy name.

    • @davidreidenberg9941
      @davidreidenberg9941 Рік тому

      Well money does have it’s advantages.

    • @davidreidenberg9941
      @davidreidenberg9941 Рік тому

      @AlexandriaOccasional-Cortex so what about the money that universities get from foreign students who pay the tuition rack rate without the benefit of government assistance. Who benefits from that cash cow?

    • @Ljounieh
      @Ljounieh Рік тому

      YESSSSS

    • @rdcsg
      @rdcsg Рік тому +2

      Lol. Middle class can’t afford donations.

    • @umasailor8289
      @umasailor8289 Рік тому +4

      @@davidreidenberg9941buts that’s discriminatory too if you want to get down to the grit. If you have a poor kid and a rich kid both with similar gpa and test scores but you accept the rich kid because of what you get out of their parents pockets, then you just discriminated against the poor kid and we are right back to an un-level playing field!

  • @kevi5641
    @kevi5641 Рік тому +3

    Discrimination is discrimination no matter how you cut it.

  • @noble61483
    @noble61483 Рік тому +23

    This a huge win for equality... merit based not the color of your skin! 🎉

    • @PiscesRus
      @PiscesRus Рік тому +1

      Y’all are sick 😂

    • @marksc4636
      @marksc4636 Рік тому +3

      Legacy student based on money. Yay equality 😂

    • @erauprcwa
      @erauprcwa Рік тому

      White women benefitted the most

    • @brotherbig4651
      @brotherbig4651 Рік тому

      @@erauprcwaI don’t think it was right to do that even if it benefits women. I am glad it is banned.

    • @A.D.907
      @A.D.907 6 місяців тому

      Affirmative action is defined as a set of procedures designed to; eliminate unlawful discrimination among applicants, remedy the results of such prior discrimination, and prevent such discrimination in the future. Applicants may be seeking admission to an educational program or looking for professional employment. In modern American jurisprudence, it typically imposes remedies against discrimination on the basis of (at the very least) race, creed, color, and national origin.

  • @yessicagonzalez5723
    @yessicagonzalez5723 Рік тому +39

    We’ll it should end when legacy admissions end, why is no one discussing the real culprit of unequal education admissions when it comes to legacy admissions?

    • @pennytrue2741
      @pennytrue2741 Рік тому +1

      Legacy admissions can be a real thing; i know a girl who got into a top school who had a horrible gpa and was actually expelled in high school. However her family was well connected within the organization so it wasn’t a simple legacy admission. However I think affirmative action was a way bigger factor then legacy. I don’t know that many kids who got in because of legacy alone.

    • @marksc4636
      @marksc4636 Рік тому +3

      Money

    • @gillmsnfillman1691
      @gillmsnfillman1691 Рік тому +3

      Because it will offend a certain group who’s pretending to be always be the victim

    • @nunook5522
      @nunook5522 Рік тому

      @@gillmsnfillman1691 What group is that? Do you mean the white women who benefited the most from Affirmative Action?

    • @TheRaggedFlygon
      @TheRaggedFlygon Рік тому +2

      Don’t let perfect be the enemy of the good. This is a great move and has struck a blow against one of the most obvious forms of systemic racism

  • @steventhorson4487
    @steventhorson4487 Рік тому +11

    This drama queen chick is hyperventilating!! Love ❤️ it!!

  • @Lastone_laughing
    @Lastone_laughing Рік тому +2

    So, let’s get rid of Legacy students.

  • @gfscfinance8866
    @gfscfinance8866 Рік тому +8

    Great decision

  • @pilot8220
    @pilot8220 Рік тому +19

    Universities will still do it anyways

    • @mikethaison432
      @mikethaison432 Рік тому +12

      Of course they will, but if they are caught it will ruin them.

    • @baileym4708
      @baileym4708 Рік тому

      @@patrickwalsh4615 - Evidence proves they will still do it anyways. California has voted a couple of times to not allow affirmative action in the decision making yet left wing ideology in academia still drives race as a major factor, there is no denying to see who gets into schools like UCLA with what qualifications. In CA they use factors like neighborhood demographics now and other factors. They are resourceful in coming up with ways to push oppression narratives in college admissions. California was also very quick to follow the University of Chicago in removing standardized test scores because that objective piece of information were "barriers". According the the University of Chicago, they now removed "barriers" to students who wouldn't have gotten in otherwise, meaning those not fitting the race stereotype were less likely to get in because college admissions to a particular school is zero sum (you give one to a student, you take one from another). They justified the removal of standardized exams by a paper that showed a low correlation on college success and exam scores yet ignored the other aspects that GPA was basically no better of an indicator and that there are correlations to scores and GPAs that would be in favor to keeping exam scores as a criteria. Again, race is the reason they got rid of the exam scores, not the correlation of success.

    • @bigbearhugebear9018
      @bigbearhugebear9018 Рік тому +6

      I don't think so. They would get sued and lose money

    • @patrickwalsh4615
      @patrickwalsh4615 Рік тому +1

      @mikethaison432 of course they will? Colleges wouldn't risk losing federal $$

    • @differencemaker242
      @differencemaker242 Рік тому

      Probably, they'll just figure out another way to shoehorn it in.

  • @apooh3051
    @apooh3051 Рік тому +3

    This is a huge win for the Asians, who has been discriminated by AA for decades. Finally Asians gets a fair shot and should be rewarded by merits instead of race.

    • @A.D.907
      @A.D.907 6 місяців тому

      Affirmative action is defined as a set of procedures designed to; eliminate unlawful discrimination among applicants, remedy the results of such prior discrimination, and prevent such discrimination in the future. Applicants may be seeking admission to an educational program or looking for professional employment. In modern American jurisprudence, it typically imposes remedies against discrimination on the basis of (at the very least) race, creed, color, and national origin.

  • @mattglenn29
    @mattglenn29 Рік тому +13

    About time!

  • @garytrawinski1843
    @garytrawinski1843 Рік тому +2

    The Supreme Court did not limit affirmative action. It ended discrimination based on the color of a person skin.

  • @Jeff-cr6ur
    @Jeff-cr6ur Рік тому +8

    Perfect! Nothing more to say

  • @boethius8114
    @boethius8114 Рік тому +35

    Finally, addressing ACTUAL institutional racism

    • @joebidenisyourpresidentget2481
      @joebidenisyourpresidentget2481 Рік тому

      Happened because your segregationist friends refused to have black kids in schools.

    • @A.D.907
      @A.D.907 6 місяців тому

      🤔 Affirmative action is defined as a set of procedures designed to; eliminate unlawful discrimination among applicants, remedy the results of such prior discrimination, and prevent such discrimination in the future. Applicants may be seeking admission to an educational program or looking for professional employment. In modern American jurisprudence, it typically imposes remedies against discrimination on the basis of (at the very least) race, creed, color, and national origin.

  • @noone6787
    @noone6787 Рік тому +35

    People be like: “Only qualified students should get in”
    Qualified students: 💰💰💵💵🤑

    • @954pilot
      @954pilot Рік тому +6

      None of those emojis are a SAT score. try again. XD

    • @noone6787
      @noone6787 Рік тому +3

      @@954pilot Aww bless your heart if you actually think SAT scores get you in college 😂

    • @sasha28957
      @sasha28957 Рік тому +2

      Plenty of people get into good, big name colleges without money or connections (like almost everyone I know). It’s not that hard to get in if you study, get good grades, and have some extracurriculars.

    • @noone6787
      @noone6787 Рік тому

      @@sasha28957 yeah and everyone I know who has perfect grades and test scores and no money keep getting rejected for people who are rich and had family who went to those uni’s🤔 You see why anecdotal evidence doesn’t count?

    • @954pilot
      @954pilot Рік тому

      @@noone6787 Considering it helped me to obtain a scholarship I would say it absolutely does. Bless your heart if you think someone with a 90 IQ should be going to Harvard. XD

  • @myteng8068
    @myteng8068 Рік тому +16

    Hold grade schools and parents account able to their children's education from the start. Not making excuses for school union failing policies. and in the end try to put them through regardless of the American Merit and Exception!!! Teach our kids...now!!!

    • @A.D.907
      @A.D.907 6 місяців тому

      Affirmative action is defined as a set of procedures designed to; eliminate unlawful discrimination among applicants, remedy the results of such prior discrimination, and prevent such discrimination in the future. Applicants may be seeking admission to an educational program or looking for professional employment. In modern American jurisprudence, it typically imposes remedies against discrimination on the basis of (at the very least) race, creed, color, and national origin.

  • @bobbybarr8308
    @bobbybarr8308 Рік тому +2

    Hey, if we didn’t have affirmative action where would Kamala be today?

    • @annp.3034
      @annp.3034 Рік тому

      Kamala went to a HBCUS a historical black university.

    • @annp.3034
      @annp.3034 Рік тому

      Kamala went a HBCUS A historical black university.

    • @erauprcwa
      @erauprcwa Рік тому

      Who benefitted from Affirmative Action?

  • @MeMe-lx2jw
    @MeMe-lx2jw Рік тому +3

    Excellent! About time. Stop discriminating against people.

    • @erauprcwa
      @erauprcwa Рік тому

      White women, Asians, benefitted the most.

    • @shaneprince6572
      @shaneprince6572 Рік тому

      @@erauprcwa Asians benefited the most from AA... When the lawsuit was started by an Asian. Jesus christ, you people are genuinelly braindead.

  • @210ncsc
    @210ncsc Рік тому +7

    Wow finally!

  • @pennytrue2741
    @pennytrue2741 Рік тому +27

    I’m glad it was limited and I’m not even a conservative. I get because of certain factors some races are disproportionately affected by poor public schooling and we need to fix that. However I don’t really think you should pass over a more qualified student for a less qualified because of race. It should still be merit based and yes you can include other factors like a challenging background as part of a judging a candidate etc. Say what you will but affirmative action has definitely affected Asian and white students for a long time.

    • @randomtees
      @randomtees Рік тому

      Same. Mindless partisans on the right are rejoicing because they think it's a Black vs. white issue, when in fact this ruling will likely make it much more difficult for white students to get accepted into Harvard. This is a win for Asians.

  • @hillock10
    @hillock10 Рік тому +2

    Here is a story of affirmative action, a real one. I was employed by the U.S. Dept of Energy. The boss gathered everyone together in the Dept. and said, "We have been ordered to hire a Black engineer. Does anyone know a Black engineer? His qualifications do not matter at all." That is an exact quotation.

    • @ajosralastname7823
      @ajosralastname7823 Рік тому

      I've never seen one.

    • @happydays199
      @happydays199 Рік тому

      I know plenty of Black Engineers. Black people are not dumb. Your comment shows why affirmative action was created. You want White people to get all the Education and good jobs

    • @A.D.907
      @A.D.907 6 місяців тому

      Affirmative action is defined as a set of procedures designed to; eliminate unlawful discrimination among applicants, remedy the results of such prior discrimination, and prevent such discrimination in the future. Applicants may be seeking admission to an educational program or looking for professional employment. In modern American jurisprudence, it typically imposes remedies against discrimination on the basis of (at the very least) race, creed, color, and national origin.

    • @A.D.907
      @A.D.907 6 місяців тому

      That's cap, and you are a goofball for not suing under Affirmative Action. I would've been paid.

  • @thomasward00
    @thomasward00 Рік тому +19

    If certain groups can't score the same test scores, they shouldn't be there...... Time for some sink or swim in America
    Employers and Gov Jobs are next.... AA is done

    • @casanovavirgo4011
      @casanovavirgo4011 Рік тому

      You swear you’re smarter than all black people😂. Touch grass.

    • @LongShot90
      @LongShot90 Рік тому +7

      Thank God. I have seen too many good applicants get denied due to AA.

    • @nunook5522
      @nunook5522 Рік тому

      @thomasward00 I'd like you to ask yourself why Affirmative Action was necessary in the first place.

    • @timorthelame1
      @timorthelame1 Рік тому +4

      @@nunook5522 because of racist polices much like affirmative action itself. Now I would like you to ask yourself why you're taking issue with someone being required to earn their way into college instead of relying on their skin color and systemic racist policies like affirmative action. It must really bother you for you to be asking the same dumb question up and down the entire comment section, but the fact that it bothers you so much is just one of the added benefits of eliminating a racist policy like affirmative action. Not only that but yours is a canned response, illustrating an inability or unwillingness to think for yourself. It's actually kinda funny to me, so please stay butt hurt about it. :)

    • @nunook5522
      @nunook5522 Рік тому

      @@timorthelame1 AA is NOT racist. You feel that way because you feel something is being taken away. As American born citizens who have contributed much to this country, why is it that Black people had to fight and die for Civil Rights, Voting Rights, Fair Housing, Fair Hiring, Fair enrollment. So I guess when they said "All men are created equal", they weren't referring to Black people.

  • @Yasinburak1992
    @Yasinburak1992 Рік тому +4

    Call, racist action is finally over. This is why we vote Republican.

    • @erauprcwa
      @erauprcwa Рік тому

      Who benefitted from Affirmative Action?

  • @craigeswenson2063
    @craigeswenson2063 Рік тому +7

    I think that in creating a diverse and multi-cultural college student population, it will be difficult to "appear" to ignor "race" since heritage and international backgrounds involve race and are critical AFTER academic standards are met. There are many other pressures on students and colleges outside this "race" issue. I attended a private university 1969-73 in the south California Bay Area. Remember the Silicon Valley craze was underway as well as the Vietnam War. The later took many of our generation's young males of age being killed or damaged for life who were unfortunately drafted with had no alternatives to carrying a rifle in the jungles so the military could refine jungle warfare tactics. Some benefited in their later careers from their experiences and learned skills. I did not have to face this military commitment decision, since I was on a deferment for engineering college and then a high lottery number. My university placed emphasis on the undergraduates with 4-5 colleges, including engineering where I was. The university's blended population included Chinese, Hispanics, India, kids from East Coast, kids from the Midwest, kids from West Coast, and kids from recent immigrant families worldwide. It was worthwhile to be exposed to multi-cultures outside the classroom along with the university graduation requirements for 3-4 liberal courses. In engineering we saw fewer political activism than other areas of the campus. We heard of the activism at Cal-Berkeley, Stanford, San Jose State college, and SF State college. But, even those students said it was not campus wide. It was dynamic times. Creating a blended or cosmopolitan student population helps to broaden young people's horizons for exposure to other countries or USA places. Once ALL applicants meet the college academic standards as well as extra-curricular involvement, the selection of applicants from multi-cultural backgrounds is a challenge. Since my university was Catholic, I imagine they wanted a reasonable number of Catholic students. I suggest that race and skin color are different criteria. For example, we have all have seen blond and red-haired caucasians from Mexico. It will be a challenge to create the impression that race is completely ignored when background and heritage looks like race. As long as the standards are uniform fair, void of favoritism or bias, and applicable to every applicant. Good luck.

    • @RIMESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
      @RIMESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS Рік тому

      There is nothing to gain from mingling with other races and people except the delusion of a pan human future free from war and conflict. People are irreconcilably different, stick to your own.

  • @IP0Monsturd
    @IP0Monsturd Рік тому +6

    Corn pop may be a bad dude but Corn Pop ain’t getting into Harvard with a D- gpa anymore.

  • @againstviralmisinformation510
    @againstviralmisinformation510 Рік тому +2

    A friendly reminder that affirmative action was not abolished for the military. I wonder why

  • @stormyweather9917
    @stormyweather9917 Рік тому +6

    Ketanji Black Jackson with her opinion on this case has proved that she is not qualified to be on the Supreme Court.

  • @jys2s
    @jys2s Рік тому +5

    Great news!🎉

  • @billyevans4929
    @billyevans4929 Рік тому +2

    Disgusting unfair racist method that was rightfully overturned. Any common sense human being thinks that hard work & merit should be *THE* deciding factor of college admission, period. That's what's fair

    • @erauprcwa
      @erauprcwa Рік тому

      Who benefitted from Affirmative Action?

  • @michaelthomas9440
    @michaelthomas9440 Рік тому +10

    Another great decision!😂😂😂

    • @A.D.907
      @A.D.907 6 місяців тому

      Affirmative action is defined as a set of procedures designed to; eliminate unlawful discrimination among applicants, remedy the results of such prior discrimination, and prevent such discrimination in the future. Applicants may be seeking admission to an educational program or looking for professional employment. In modern American jurisprudence, it typically imposes remedies against discrimination on the basis of (at the very least) race, creed, color, and national origin.

    • @A.D.907
      @A.D.907 6 місяців тому

      Picture wanting to be anti black so bad that you allowed your government to allow for discrimination in schools

    • @michaelthomas9440
      @michaelthomas9440 6 місяців тому

      @@A.D.907 affirmative action is discrimination. Thank God we don't have to be bothered with that anti-white policy anymore. ⚡⚡

  • @bluesky5384
    @bluesky5384 Рік тому +3

    I'm having a hard time finding people that are upset by this verdict. Let's keep working toward equality and figure out how to better the k-12 level as well. Teachers are working hard in a system that needs help.

    • @A.D.907
      @A.D.907 6 місяців тому

      😂😂😂 Affirmative action is defined as a set of procedures designed to; eliminate unlawful discrimination among applicants, remedy the results of such prior discrimination, and prevent such discrimination in the future. Applicants may be seeking admission to an educational program or looking for professional employment. In modern American jurisprudence, it typically imposes remedies against discrimination on the basis of (at the very least) race, creed, color, and national origin.

  • @quentincrisp6933
    @quentincrisp6933 Рік тому +3

    Reparations have ended! Welfare is next!

  • @mortyharenza9854
    @mortyharenza9854 Рік тому +2

    You forget the vote was actually 7-3. Ginny gets to vote also.

  • @stephaniepilecki2774
    @stephaniepilecki2774 Рік тому +17

    My son could not get 8nto medical school even though he had perfect grades in high school and college out the ying yang and extra curricular crap, etc. bc he is white. Finally got in when he was almost 30. Go figure!!

    • @randomtees
      @randomtees Рік тому

      I've got some bad news, pal. This ruling will make it more difficult for whites to get accepted to med school. It's going to be an Asian paradise.

    • @MinhTran-fc7jl
      @MinhTran-fc7jl Рік тому

      you White People need to stand up, the World would be still in stone age if it wasn't for Whites.

    • @yankeesny1572
      @yankeesny1572 Рік тому

      Sorry to hear about the racism against white people

    • @erauprcwa
      @erauprcwa Рік тому

      White people, specifically white women benefitted the most from Affirmative Action. If you think he didn't get in because he's white, you fail to see the real reason why he didn't get in. Grades can't make up for a crappy personality.

    • @amazingdany
      @amazingdany Рік тому

      Is he now an attending physician?

  • @ebonysmith1493
    @ebonysmith1493 Рік тому +8

    Now when people don't get in they won't have this as a scapegoat anymore.

    • @erauprcwa
      @erauprcwa Рік тому

      If they had a scapegoat, they're not good people... white women benefitted the most. Blaming any other group showed how racist they were

    • @A.D.907
      @A.D.907 6 місяців тому

      Affirmative action is defined as a set of procedures designed to; eliminate unlawful discrimination among applicants, remedy the results of such prior discrimination, and prevent such discrimination in the future. Applicants may be seeking admission to an educational program or looking for professional employment. In modern American jurisprudence, it typically imposes remedies against discrimination on the basis of (at the very least) race, creed, color, and national origin.

  • @ploppill34
    @ploppill34 Рік тому +22

    Finally, Martin Luther King Jr.’s wishes are being upheld in the color of one’s skin isn’t being taken into account

    • @jonathanayala375
      @jonathanayala375 Рік тому

      I won’t trust any state not to mess up the execution of this decision, regardless of the political leanings of the states.

    • @PeripheralVisionary
      @PeripheralVisionary Рік тому +10

      Well no. For MLKJ he actually supported affirmative action, having voiced his support for programs which used the practice as a response to discrimination.
      I actually am not against the ruling, but we need to stop misappropriating MLKJ to support our own beliefs. It is disrespectful to his memory while also not being a good argument in general.
      Keep in mind the era MLKJ lived in.

    • @pilot8220
      @pilot8220 Рік тому +1

      Nope, Martin Luther King Jr 's wishes aren't being upheld, dumaz

    • @blackbird2380
      @blackbird2380 Рік тому

      Racist whites love to quote MLK out of context. I do agree that he integrated us into a burning house and Black ppl should go to HBCUs. I'm sure all white and asians schools will still thrive without our talents lol.

    • @bobsburgers4678
      @bobsburgers4678 Рік тому +5

      He also wanted guaranteed income and federal job programs but I don’t see conservatives so supportive of those ideas

  • @davecarroll8186
    @davecarroll8186 Рік тому +3

    YES.....YES and YES..finally something to Feel Good about!!!!!

  • @marcomondragon7276
    @marcomondragon7276 Рік тому +9

    Great news to hear!

    • @globalinsanity2652
      @globalinsanity2652 Рік тому

      Yes, now the Asian students will even begin to shove aside white students....our universities will be filled with only Asian students who are good at taking tests...so so cool.

    • @A.D.907
      @A.D.907 6 місяців тому

      Affirmative action is defined as a set of procedures designed to; eliminate unlawful discrimination among applicants, remedy the results of such prior discrimination, and prevent such discrimination in the future. Applicants may be seeking admission to an educational program or looking for professional employment. In modern American jurisprudence, it typically imposes remedies against discrimination on the basis of (at the very least) race, creed, color, and national origin.
      Picture being so anti black that you are glad we can now discriminate 😂 we have black colleges and universities that we want immigrants and people who aren't black at and now we can have that based on this 🤷‍♂️

  • @setsom2857
    @setsom2857 Рік тому +13

    They'll figure this one out. There are other qualifying factors that black and brown people possess that will justify granting them admission such as income , geographically destress areas, giving more weight to first generation admission to a university. Variables are Variables that are meant to message for an institution's intent.

    • @rdcsg
      @rdcsg Рік тому +1

      Distressed areas gets less preference. Students in the wealthy New England area has historically higher admissions.

  • @alainbao3762
    @alainbao3762 Рік тому +4

    If you want to get to good school, study hard to get high scores. Period for everyone.

    • @A.D.907
      @A.D.907 6 місяців тому

      Affirmative action is defined as a set of procedures designed to; eliminate unlawful discrimination among applicants, remedy the results of such prior discrimination, and prevent such discrimination in the future. Applicants may be seeking admission to an educational program or looking for professional employment. In modern American jurisprudence, it typically imposes remedies against discrimination on the basis of (at the very least) race, creed, color, and national origin.

  • @DanielKolbin
    @DanielKolbin Рік тому +1

    Give an advantage based on household income rather than ethnicity.

    • @Ms.Doomer
      @Ms.Doomer Рік тому

      Now don’t be too reasonable

  • @staredecisis7
    @staredecisis7 Рік тому +5

    Legacy admissions !== racial discrimination

    • @Ann-nr4tx
      @Ann-nr4tx Рік тому

      They are wrong but not the same thing.

    • @Grundig305
      @Grundig305 Рік тому

      How’s that? Blacks are admitted by legacy too. discrimination against whites and Asians is racism, pure and simple.

  • @ahc1230
    @ahc1230 Рік тому +4

    W Supreme court

  • @alainbao3762
    @alainbao3762 Рік тому +1

    What wrong with that ? Whoever scores high then they will get to colleges.

  • @thorrrr1962
    @thorrrr1962 Рік тому +3

    What? So you actually have to have good academics to get into these school?

  • @MrS98VAC
    @MrS98VAC Рік тому +3

    Sorry "victims"....

  • @user-lj9tk7ji1c
    @user-lj9tk7ji1c Рік тому +9

    White women benefited the most with AA.

    • @erauprcwa
      @erauprcwa Рік тому

      Thank you!!!! You're the only person I've seen make this very factual statement. I see a lot of people blaming black and brown people, which shows their own racism.

  • @deek4412
    @deek4412 Рік тому +2

    We hav had affirmative action for decades and decades and it hasn't helped time to stop it!!

    • @erauprcwa
      @erauprcwa Рік тому +1

      Just say you've never done research on this subject. It's easier.

    • @deek4412
      @deek4412 Рік тому

      @@erauprcwa It appears that you haven't done anything...ha ha ha

  • @baxterscientific
    @baxterscientific Рік тому +2

    MERIT BASED.
    Stop telling black people they need special help. Its racist and disgusting.

    • @erauprcwa
      @erauprcwa Рік тому

      Who benefitted from Affirmative Action? LOL Your own comment when you look at who benefitted from AA will show how racist your comment is. Good job!

  • @WA_S_S_AW
    @WA_S_S_AW Рік тому +9

    Does that mean that admissions will now be prioritized by testing?

    • @9doggie12
      @9doggie12 Рік тому +1

      Nope, testing isn’t required.

    • @crazy32people55
      @crazy32people55 Рік тому

      Best most are known to cheat and this is a proven fact!

    • @absinthe_enigmafoxglove2896
      @absinthe_enigmafoxglove2896 Рік тому

      Whoever can bust the dopest rhymes, yo.🤣

    • @WA_S_S_AW
      @WA_S_S_AW Рік тому

      @@9doggie12 Well thank God for that, at least some Americans will get in then. If it was just testing no Americans would get in.

    • @WA_S_S_AW
      @WA_S_S_AW Рік тому

      @@patrickwalsh4615 Legacy and well connected rich really don’t want to make themselves targets and that’s what would happen. The nails that stand out get hammered down first and when you’re the only nail poking up; guess what? It’s no fun being elite when you are outnumbered 10,000 to 1.

  • @markc-ru4qz
    @markc-ru4qz Рік тому +17

    I'm so thrilled about this. Affirmative action is why we have people like London Breed in office with San Francisco crumbling around her ears and she can't understand why.

    • @theagent3
      @theagent3 Рік тому

      Blame that on Liberal Whites. They are the problem, not the Blacks.

  • @buttaflyantics8618
    @buttaflyantics8618 Рік тому +1

    If your GPA and work ethic was actually considered affirmative action would have never existed.

    • @erauprcwa
      @erauprcwa Рік тому

      Do you know why Affirmative Action started?

  • @kittenbrave1003
    @kittenbrave1003 Рік тому +1

    Now let's stop legacy admissions...

  • @freespeech9756
    @freespeech9756 Рік тому +7

    It should be limited it should be eliminated

    • @pilot8220
      @pilot8220 Рік тому +1

      Your ignorance should be eliminated

  • @elenamonteagudo9855
    @elenamonteagudo9855 Рік тому +1

    Now close the welfare office, NOW !

    • @erauprcwa
      @erauprcwa Рік тому

      White people in large benefit from welfare

  • @sharontyler6248
    @sharontyler6248 Рік тому +2

    Now get rid of DEI 😊

    • @erauprcwa
      @erauprcwa Рік тому

      Who benefitted from Affirmative Action?

  • @StudentAthletes2000
    @StudentAthletes2000 Рік тому +19

    Welp, if you can afford SAT prep and other outside programs for academic support, have a stay at home parent, and a legacy parent that went to a prestigious school, you are in good shape and this really won’t affect you.

    • @pennytrue2741
      @pennytrue2741 Рік тому +1

      It’s really not that simple. It depends on an individual child and their own motivation. A lot of kids I know like this actually weren’t as motivated as someone who came from say a lower socioeconomic background and didn’t have those luxuries. Motivation sometimes not always trumps being able to “afford” something. That being said, yes a lot of kids in this situation might be at an advantage - hence why we need to invest more in public schools.

    • @210ncsc
      @210ncsc Рік тому +2

      There is no way this is actually your logic

    • @SteveFrance-jw8de
      @SteveFrance-jw8de Рік тому

      Dumb kids don't deserve high merit slots

    • @ladyraddxjbs5893
      @ladyraddxjbs5893 Рік тому

      Even unmotivated people with privilege will end up in college

    • @brotherbig4651
      @brotherbig4651 Рік тому

      Most Asians don’t have any of this and they can still get high grades. They simply work hard and be disciplined.

  • @NNShephard
    @NNShephard Рік тому +41

    Thank you President Trump for appointing some great Judges.

  • @valkimura1053
    @valkimura1053 Рік тому +2

    Stop spinning. They just upheld the constitution, which is their job. You can't discriminate on race, color, or creed.

  • @yankee5886
    @yankee5886 Рік тому +1

    I'm just waiting to hear what Elizabeth Warren has to say. 😂

    • @Ann-nr4tx
      @Ann-nr4tx Рік тому +1

      Particularly as a woman of color.

  • @Supras111
    @Supras111 Рік тому +6

    BRAVO!

  • @anthonyvalenti9093
    @anthonyvalenti9093 Рік тому +1

    No quotas!!!!!!!

  • @jayh1391
    @jayh1391 Рік тому +1

    Schools are funded with budget from that city and county.
    So if you live in Beverly Hill, school can have pool, air conditioning, etc
    If you live in Compton, school can't even fix broken window.
    State must distribute all school funds EQUALLY to each school.
    So all students have opportunity to apply to college.

  • @thorium9503
    @thorium9503 Рік тому +10

    This is a complex problem. Yes we don’t want kids to be put aside in terms of college admissions based on their race but on the flip side we have an issue of fair/equal education in K-12. Most private/public schools with good facilities have less diverse student bodies. The problem with this is that these schools put a huge amount of emphasis on tutors, test prep for college exams, and much more. Making the chances of getting into a college easier. It’s not exactly fair when the school next door has more children of color and their parents make a lower income which means: unable to afford private schools, or the public schools do not get the same amount of funding which means less preparation efforts for college and more of a focus on just getting the child through school. If funding for all public schools were equal then I feel like this wouldn’t be an issue but we have too many disparities in the education system.

    • @birdlynn417
      @birdlynn417 Рік тому +4

      Maybe poor people will CHOOSE to do well, CHOOSE to not do crime, CHOOSE to better themselves, like we all have to do, no matter what color you are.

    • @plau2007
      @plau2007 Рік тому +4

      Affirmative action it is a program that favors rich Black and Hispanic kids not poor that you are talking about!

    • @birdlynn417
      @birdlynn417 Рік тому +2

      You need to have a conversation with black, Conservative Americans, try to have that conversation with them and they will tell you the truth. You might really learn something.

    • @robyn1276
      @robyn1276 Рік тому +1

      you dont have a right to private schools their selfunded

    • @thorium9503
      @thorium9503 Рік тому

      @@plau2007 Yeah no dip Sherlock that’s why they banned “Race Based Affirmative Action” we need to put aside race and look at socioeconomic factors.

  • @ThatsJustMyBabyDaddy
    @ThatsJustMyBabyDaddy Рік тому +11

    No affirmative action for higher education but gerrymandering voting districts is just fine? Make it make sense. 😂

    • @williamschlass6371
      @williamschlass6371 Рік тому +4

      Okay, ill go next. No affirmative action for higher education but drag shows for kids is just fine? You might be wondering what one has to do with the other. You would be correct.

    • @tonpetitami
      @tonpetitami Рік тому +1

      They just struck down two gerrymandering cases in Louisiana and Alabama. Also the woke crowd conveniently ignores AA when Blacks are the majority such as in the universities' athletics department😂😂😂😂

    • @jordandennis6794
      @jordandennis6794 Рік тому

      Cope child groomer. You'll meet your destiny in the streets soon enough

    • @fareflight2029
      @fareflight2029 Рік тому

      Non-sequitur. These two issues have literally nothing to do with each other. Gerrymandering existing has nothing to do with and doesn't justify literal institutional racism in favor of certain races.

    • @nunook5522
      @nunook5522 Рік тому

      @@tonpetitami Define woke.

  • @jennetal.984
    @jennetal.984 Рік тому +2

    Free at last! Free at last!
    Hallelujah ⛓️ 🔥
    We’re free AT LAST!

  • @StudentAthletes2000
    @StudentAthletes2000 Рік тому +1

    Okay Howard, Hampton, Morehouse, Spellman and others, time to step up.

  • @peanut2us
    @peanut2us Рік тому +7

    In college I wrote a paper on the mindset of a nation in 1965 and the need for affirmative action to protect people ignored by the common hate that prevailed. Today we have different attitudes. But, if we would have just desegregated when it was on the table we would be having a different narrative.

    • @brianlevine249
      @brianlevine249 Рік тому

      Today there is still a "common hate that prevails". They just shifted the focus. Now the common hate is against whites.

    • @user-fr3hl6mg6z
      @user-fr3hl6mg6z Рік тому +1

      So you were part of the problem..... got it 👍

    • @A.D.907
      @A.D.907 6 місяців тому

      Affirmative action is defined as a set of procedures designed to; eliminate unlawful discrimination among applicants, remedy the results of such prior discrimination, and prevent such discrimination in the future. Applicants may be seeking admission to an educational program or looking for professional employment. In modern American jurisprudence, it typically imposes remedies against discrimination on the basis of (at the very least) race, creed, color, and national origin.

  • @andycig2993
    @andycig2993 Рік тому +7

    What an amazing Court President Trump has given the nation.
    In spite of the Biden stain.

    • @rmwtsou
      @rmwtsou Рік тому

      Absolutely! I am voting for him!

  • @michaeld9682
    @michaeld9682 Рік тому +2

    Finally some sanity!

  • @ashburnconnecttv7860
    @ashburnconnecttv7860 Рік тому +1

    It (AA) did not benefit Black people, but it benefits everyone else more! This will backfire for the racist people who sued to target Black students.

  • @copevortex
    @copevortex Рік тому +10

    A big win for equality

  • @johnsenate2214
    @johnsenate2214 Рік тому +11

    So sad, you can’t be first in line just for being black anymore. 😢

    • @nunook5522
      @nunook5522 Рік тому

      @johnsenate2214 I didn't get that memo? Can you send me that link?

    • @blackbird2380
      @blackbird2380 Рік тому

      Is it delusion or stupidity?

    • @Retireded03
      @Retireded03 Рік тому

      @@nunook5522 One can build a rocket and the other can bounce a bassetball

    • @nunook5522
      @nunook5522 Рік тому

      @@Retireded03 That's your problem right there. We were not put here to be your entertainment.

    • @montega.
      @montega. Рік тому

      ​@@Retireded03and what do you do?

  • @paweltrawicki2200
    @paweltrawicki2200 Рік тому

    Wow!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @coveyssteve
    @coveyssteve Рік тому +1

    Vice President Kamala Harris, an identity hire with no qualifications, weighed in as well, saying: "Affirmative action is affirmative, and that's good. Without affirmative action, we will have non-affirmative action which is the worst kind of action. And that's bad. HA HA HAHAHAHAHA!"

    • @glenroyscott2350
      @glenroyscott2350 Рік тому

      What is your dear leader from Tromp University get as brain peanut

  • @williamschlass6371
    @williamschlass6371 Рік тому +5

    Why does michelle obama say that people are going to work harder than they should have to? That was already the case under affirmative action for anyone not black or hispanic. I believe in affirmative action but it should be based on socioeconomic status, not ethnicity.

    • @theodoreparson4321
      @theodoreparson4321 Рік тому

      Ok and if you base it on social economic status than that will hurt people of color more due to the built up systemic racism that has existed where most of our communities have been underfunded meaning our schools aren't as good as those in white areas which in turn mean we don't get the same quality of education and than we have lower score that even though they may be passing you will have good schools deny us admittance making it harder for us to get an even better education that can afford us better opportunities

    • @erauprcwa
      @erauprcwa Рік тому

      Who benefitted from Affirmative Action? Because you statement about "...anyone not black or hispanic." is grossly inaccurate and shows the ignorance on the subject matter.

  • @juansanchez6042
    @juansanchez6042 Рік тому +6

    Once again the greatest president of this generation strikes again. Trump 2024

  • @bondwin7025
    @bondwin7025 Рік тому

    What is wrong with meritocracy? Zero .

  • @TiberiusGracchusII
    @TiberiusGracchusII Рік тому +2

    I haven't seen the looney left this mad since we ended slavery in the U.S. , smh. 😏 🤡

    • @erauprcwa
      @erauprcwa Рік тому

      Uh, the "left" is who actually ended slavery, per political paradigms. Do not confuse the "left" or "right" with political party, which is independent of ideology. In the 1800s the 'liberals' were the Republicans and the 'conservatives' were the Democrats. Said party ideology flipped around the 1960s and into the 1970s with the use of the Southern Strategy and the fact many Democrats like JFK and LBJ threw support to the Civil Rights Act, leading southern Democrats to be courted by the Republican party.
      The Republican party of today would NOT have been in favor of Emancipation, that's just a political fact.

  • @bagobeans
    @bagobeans Рік тому +7

    GOOD!!