Best quote of the video: "Yeah, this doesn't make a lot of sense. So far, I'm not in danger from these two homes." AI will not be able to create anything better than you for sure. You have so much experience, knowledge, and education backing your work. Keep up the great work!
The talent shows! I would love to see some more in-depth explanations on your thoughts, how to sketch a space, maybe even some 3D models? Love the videos
Did you get a chance to look at this video: ua-cam.com/video/3Giu1dPKGyg/v-deo.html ? We're a small team so we're trying to keep the video's coming, we'll be sure to get some 3D examples in a future video! Thank you!
you forgot one important thing: AI that your guy is using is NOT - I repeat NOT - trained to do that. Its like to ask Picasso to make an architecture. Dont worry, in your time, someone will train AI on architecture and AI will make an incredible output. I am sure about it. With all plans, including plumbing and electricity plans. I am AI developer and also deeply interesting in architecture, but no, I will not train AI. :)
With all due respect to your profession, AI at its best with all the LLM of architecture training will only replicate the best work of previously designed architecture by architects, its a very thoughtful profession, architecture is very misunderstood profession by well educated professionals, its very noble profession with multiple disciplines. Its not about designing houses. You are a developer right name me one software apart from REVIT/ARCHICAD that can do BIM. revit itself is a collection of softwares and large designing firm are dependent on BIM softwares but revit does nothing by itself it only works with the creative process with inputs from multiple professionals.
@@salimbaig5145 yes, you are right. AI will do what was "already seen". In 99.99% its good enough. For common house? For sure. My point is that you are comparing apples with oranges. We are not using chatGPT to create image and we are not using DALL·E 3 to write poem. You are not using Windows Notepad to design CAD floor plan. I hope this helps.
@@salimbaig5145 There is no respect due here - to you, sadly. This is all an amount of crap that makes me think you are a bad architect trying to cope. * You say AI will never be better than the best architect. Let's agree here (I do not, just for the sake of argument) - that makes AI still better (and cheaper and faster) than 99.99% of the architects around. Bad news for basically everyone. * You assume that Architects come up with NEW things - they generally do NOT. Pretty much every design element has already been done before in some kind or the other. The rest is - granted, not unimportant - recombination. That is like painters. How many really come up with a new style? Hint: 99.99999% are out. * You finally talk Architects up as a noble profession blablablabla - 50% of architects are below average by definition of a gaussian distribution of skills. Heck, even if AI only copies - it eliminates 95% of the jobs outright. And then you go on as software - this is ignorant as heck. SHOULD AI not stop - software will not be a limiting factor in a decade. AI Will make any software needed for cents. And I am not joking. The AI coprocessor that a modern "AI ready" PC is supposed to have is 40 million times faster than th C64 of 40 years ago, 1 million times faster than the then fastest computer (CRAY II). There is no indication this will not go on for quite some time. I know of models in development that using current technology can do complex software development - not the general-purpose stuff. If that follows through, in 5 years you fold 100 people teams into 5 seniors talking to AI... and 5 years later? So, sorry, ignorant as heck. Now, there is hope that things do not go as I say - but, and that is the crux, all indications are than any bad projection on my side just pushes the inevitable out a couple of years. As @outtony says - current AI is not trained on architecture, and it actually generally does not work in complex visual corrective loops. All that WILL change. But really, you must have a realistic look at what the profession you try to make half-gods in white entails - and it is not as perfect as you love to make them. In fact, architects are a "failed" profession in that less and less are really doing architecture - today you can buy building plans for little money, have them often adjusted to your wishes for little money. VERY few people really pay for creativity that then costs a lot more in production. It is all, for now, optimization of cost/benefit. Read up the definition of AGI - once we hit that, essentially, Architects are replaced by AI.
We went with Midjourney for this video because the AI options created for architects still leaves a LOT to be desired. It was surprisingly the best suited for what we were looking to test on this project. We understand the logic behind the promise of AI, just like we understand the promises made by cryptocurrency a decade ago. Yes, crypto has come a long ways and still has a ways to go, but those early promises didn't factor in a lot of the human variables that impacted it's ability to fulfill them. The threat of AI still exists to remove human creativity to pursue cutting costs, but we're not so bullish that it'll be happening as fast as some people fear.
@@visbeenarchitectsinc You lack the logic. Crypto - which made a LOT of people very rich, btw. - did not have a 90% price reduction in a competitive market. Anything AI can replace it will because companies save money. Simple like that. Totally different situation. For people in developped - or most - countries for crypto the question is "what can it do that my credit card can not" and it is valid. AI for companies is a MAJOR cost saving. This is cars and horses again - took 13 years to essentially wipe out horse carts.
Grab some trace paper and print images of buildings you love and trace the image on your trace paper. Then try it again without the image underneath. Reading is also really helpful. Find the architects you're drawn to and read anything you can get your hands on that they've either written or interviews they've done.
You have to remember that the AI used here is probably the equivalent of a horse and cart in terms of personal transport. In a decade or two there will be the equivalent of cars and then planes and so on. However, architecture is about intuition, empathy for the human experience and many things intangible. Similar to massage or psychology, I really don't think AI can fully overtake this kind of skillset and profession. However ... I may well take over most of the work producing technical documents, engineering calculations and other computerised work tasks.
Best quote of the video: "Yeah, this doesn't make a lot of sense. So far, I'm not in danger from these two homes."
AI will not be able to create anything better than you for sure. You have so much experience, knowledge, and education backing your work. Keep up the great work!
Thank you! We're open to the meaningful contributions AI can offer, but we're ready for the hype to die down!
The talent shows! I would love to see some more in-depth explanations on your thoughts, how to sketch a space, maybe even some 3D models? Love the videos
Did you get a chance to look at this video: ua-cam.com/video/3Giu1dPKGyg/v-deo.html ? We're a small team so we're trying to keep the video's coming, we'll be sure to get some 3D examples in a future video! Thank you!
How to remove the background music to concentrate my architecture design class which not taught in my academics...
you forgot one important thing: AI that your guy is using is NOT - I repeat NOT - trained to do that. Its like to ask Picasso to make an architecture. Dont worry, in your time, someone will train AI on architecture and AI will make an incredible output. I am sure about it. With all plans, including plumbing and electricity plans. I am AI developer and also deeply interesting in architecture, but no, I will not train AI. :)
With all due respect to your profession, AI at its best with all the LLM of architecture training will only replicate the best work of previously designed architecture by architects, its a very thoughtful profession, architecture is very misunderstood profession by well educated professionals, its very noble profession with multiple disciplines. Its not about designing houses. You are a developer right name me one software apart from REVIT/ARCHICAD that can do BIM. revit itself is a collection of softwares and large designing firm are dependent on BIM softwares but revit does nothing by itself it only works with the creative process with inputs from multiple professionals.
@@salimbaig5145 yes, you are right. AI will do what was "already seen". In 99.99% its good enough. For common house? For sure. My point is that you are comparing apples with oranges. We are not using chatGPT to create image and we are not using DALL·E 3 to write poem. You are not using Windows Notepad to design CAD floor plan. I hope this helps.
@@salimbaig5145 There is no respect due here - to you, sadly. This is all an amount of crap that makes me think you are a bad architect trying to cope.
* You say AI will never be better than the best architect. Let's agree here (I do not, just for the sake of argument) - that makes AI still better (and cheaper and faster) than 99.99% of the architects around. Bad news for basically everyone.
* You assume that Architects come up with NEW things - they generally do NOT. Pretty much every design element has already been done before in some kind or the other. The rest is - granted, not unimportant - recombination. That is like painters. How many really come up with a new style? Hint: 99.99999% are out.
* You finally talk Architects up as a noble profession blablablabla - 50% of architects are below average by definition of a gaussian distribution of skills. Heck, even if AI only copies - it eliminates 95% of the jobs outright.
And then you go on as software - this is ignorant as heck. SHOULD AI not stop - software will not be a limiting factor in a decade. AI Will make any software needed for cents. And I am not joking. The AI coprocessor that a modern "AI ready" PC is supposed to have is 40 million times faster than th C64 of 40 years ago, 1 million times faster than the then fastest computer (CRAY II). There is no indication this will not go on for quite some time. I know of models in development that using current technology can do complex software development - not the general-purpose stuff. If that follows through, in 5 years you fold 100 people teams into 5 seniors talking to AI... and 5 years later?
So, sorry, ignorant as heck.
Now, there is hope that things do not go as I say - but, and that is the crux, all indications are than any bad projection on my side just pushes the inevitable out a couple of years. As @outtony says - current AI is not trained on architecture, and it actually generally does not work in complex visual corrective loops. All that WILL change.
But really, you must have a realistic look at what the profession you try to make half-gods in white entails - and it is not as perfect as you love to make them. In fact, architects are a "failed" profession in that less and less are really doing architecture - today you can buy building plans for little money, have them often adjusted to your wishes for little money. VERY few people really pay for creativity that then costs a lot more in production. It is all, for now, optimization of cost/benefit.
Read up the definition of AGI - once we hit that, essentially, Architects are replaced by AI.
We went with Midjourney for this video because the AI options created for architects still leaves a LOT to be desired. It was surprisingly the best suited for what we were looking to test on this project.
We understand the logic behind the promise of AI, just like we understand the promises made by cryptocurrency a decade ago. Yes, crypto has come a long ways and still has a ways to go, but those early promises didn't factor in a lot of the human variables that impacted it's ability to fulfill them. The threat of AI still exists to remove human creativity to pursue cutting costs, but we're not so bullish that it'll be happening as fast as some people fear.
@@visbeenarchitectsinc You lack the logic. Crypto - which made a LOT of people very rich, btw. - did not have a 90% price reduction in a competitive market. Anything AI can replace it will because companies save money. Simple like that. Totally different situation. For people in developped - or most - countries for crypto the question is "what can it do that my credit card can not" and it is valid. AI for companies is a MAJOR cost saving.
This is cars and horses again - took 13 years to essentially wipe out horse carts.
How do you get into architecture, as a teenager
Grab some trace paper and print images of buildings you love and trace the image on your trace paper. Then try it again without the image underneath.
Reading is also really helpful. Find the architects you're drawn to and read anything you can get your hands on that they've either written or interviews they've done.
@ thank you
You deserve more like 👍🏽 and subscribe❤. But please🥺 post more videos
We're a small team doing what we can to keep up with the normal UA-cam upload schedule, we hear you!
very cool
You have to remember that the AI used here is probably the equivalent of a horse and cart in terms of personal transport. In a decade or two there will be the equivalent of cars and then planes and so on. However, architecture is about intuition, empathy for the human experience and many things intangible. Similar to massage or psychology, I really don't think AI can fully overtake this kind of skillset and profession. However ... I may well take over most of the work producing technical documents, engineering calculations and other computerised work tasks.