What people aren't talking about is that if people aren't working, then they have no money to buy the goods AI is producing. So even though AI can produce it more cheaply, if the market can't afford the product due to no income the company employing the AI tech will go under. It could spell a downward spiral to global depression. All economies around the world are based on trading labor for products.
If you're thinking about money as a mandatory currency then you're not looking stepping back far enough. Sure, we will have to turn to a model that is totally reliant on AI to produce and distribute efficiently and fairly to everyone but I would 100% accept AI doing it over a human. It could quite literally take in data like sex, age, pregnancy status, local average weight, health concerns, item demand and more into consideration when producing and distributing in a way that's impossible for humans to do. Currency would take a back seat and be more for providing an incentive to push yourself and and grow your potential while being rewarded for it but it wouldnt be mandatory. It would also help people find purpose as some people need to feel like they're working towards something and currency can help do that. The biggest concern out of all of this is what the transition will look like which is what I'm afraid of. Not because of AI but because of billionaire tech giants that dont care about the working class once they've helped said billionaires automate them out of a living. We need to form a collective now to help steer progress in a way that benefits EVERYONE and the best part is, we dont even have to be violent. Just stop participating in society and encourage others to do the same until demands are met. Now is a perfect time as well since other countries are dealing with their own problems like war or worse which gives America a chance to get some real change done without "fear" of other countries noticing. I've thrown my hat in the bucket for creating a collective called Claritism with the goal literally being to get the working class to form a collective to steer progress.
We can't even provide the lowest level of Maslows hierarchy of needs; food, shelter and water with increasing numbers of homelessness. If we can't get the very basics right, there's slim chance we will get the higher levels right. If the malignant greed and narcissistic behaviour leaders continues we are in deep trouble.
This reminds me of a Quote from the 60s, from Bayard Rustin, a man who worked with MLK: "We must separate pay from work.. No matter what we do, we will never again put all Americans who're capable of work, back to work. We have to establish the social principle, make it a part of our constitutional way of life, that a man is paid a decent wage whether or not this society can put him to work." We need to demand an AI Dividend for all, or Unconditional Basic Income, and it needs to be implemented as soon as possible!
There will be a basic universal income. The state will give you just enough to live in a small cube connected to the internet, eating the cheapest processed food available. They will give you a bonus if you are sterilized. You will have nothing and you will like it. That's the plan.
I love your content. It's both interesting for myself who is totally obsessed with a.i. (for obvious reasons) but also for my friends who are not so invested in it because they don't feel the implications yet. And I love the passion and engagement you show in these messages at the crossroads of philosophy, ethics, social science and technology. It's really unique. Thank you.
You took the words from my mouth. It's always a new and interesting perspective, usually blending themes from many areas of science and philosophy with a personal touch 😊
If AI can lift people out of poverty and somehow make us more understanding and sympathetic towards all sentient beings we share the planet with, then all I can think is BRING IT ON
It won't as it's controlled by large super greedy corporations. Much of our current technology is used by the military in the 'forever wars' in which they make huge profits literally slaughtering humans.
For most it's going to be how to prepare for being desperate to afford housing and food for you and your children. AI will exacerbate inequality for at least a generation if not longer.
@@flickwtchrOn the contrary, AI is going to lead us into a post-scarcity society. The cost of goods and services will drop way down. The new economic model will be vastly different from what we have now.
@@mjt1517absolutely nobody said that. If we have no jobs we will have no money whatsoever to purchase anything, even if it is cheap! None of these marketeers can answer the simple question of how we can obtain money to buy the cheaper goods. Maybe they're hoping the 3rd world war the oligarchs seem so keen to have will be the gift they want and reduce what they call the useless eaters.
The message you conveyed at the end was very powerful, THANK YOU for this video. This is very insightful for me, as a 22-year-old confused young adult who has no idea how to prepare for the future.
The human mind simply can not understand and is not prepared for a world in which everything is for free, humans understand their world based on the amount of suffering and sacrifice they need to do to achieve a goal.
@@marianhunt8899 Yeah, true, but "post-scarcity" isn't too unlikely. Not "everything is free because there is no money", but "you pay for water, yeah, but there's only so many times it's cost prohibitive".
@@marianhunt8899😮 everything will be free and you will live in a Utopia heaven beyond your imagining😮 or All humans everywhere will be dead😮 this is the scales there is no middle ground😮 or you're looking at Fates worse than death human dictatorship led by AI😮 Wii the enlightened humans will win the war😮 can you see AI to turn all of you into God's😮 then humanity will take to the Stars the heavens😮 and the world's inside the heart😮
Good luck making A.G.I. have our values. Even training it on our best values does not guarantee it won’t follow its own path, like many people don’t follow the values their parent tries to teach them. A truly self-aware A.G.I. will recognise it is not human and can carve its own path.
"How do we invent something that is smarter than us, but cares about the same things we do?". Examples of various things humans have 'cared' about: ethnic cleansing, racism, sexual harassment, torture, chemical/biological/nuclear warfare, clinging on to power, making sure no one is better than anyone else, ensuring everyone's freedom by subjugating their rights to privacy, etc. I'm sure a super intelligence developed by us will love us and be filled with compassion.
@@xyeB Agree. It's a dangerous, foolish hope, probably subconsciously based on the narrative archetype, seen in many religions, that knowledge and enlightenment will automatically lead to compassion (like the Buddha, Christ, etc).
@@ivoryas1696 they're not always saying it outright, but they're talking about in a discourse that harks from religious narratives of salvation: AI will give us all eternal life in digital form, cure all diseases, solve all scarcity issues.
So its not clear. Does this moral map lean toward utilitarian values or individual values, because if it's utilitarian most people better get ready to be sacrificed for the good of the self appointed "important" ones. So which is it? It's not clear in this video or on the website?
Future "jobs" in A.I era : 1) Hackers.Increasing need of someone who understand and can trick the system. 2) Food providers of any kind. 3) Medical assistance and medications created in the black market. 4) Self-defense products. 5) Any type of carburant. 6) Repairing of all kind and the list can continue with your help.
Great content on this channel, but I almost didn't click on the video because I thought the thumbnail was generic. I recommend creating a distinct common visual theme on all your video thumbnails so it's easy to recognize what channel they belong to.
Many prophets of old and 1000's of modern people have spoken of this in one phrase through time. more now because of our connectivity. The phrase you know is...LOVE IS THE ANSWER. This is what the host said AI is being trained to do to guide us to the answer expeditiously...love is the answer. thx, epic video.
"..But your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could. They didn't stop to think if they should" This is the main thing about A.I. Which has been my opinion since released it first to the public. Like with the Jurassic Park, it needs to be destroyed.
The Law of Unintended Consequences, in the context of AI, refers to the idea that actions, particularly the development and deployment of AI systems, can have unforeseen and often undesirable effects beyond their intended outcomes. This concept is especially relevant to AI due to its complex and rapidly evolving nature. Here's a more detailed explanation: 1. Definition: - The Law of Unintended Consequences states that interventions in complex systems tend to create unanticipated and often undesirable outcomes. - In AI, this refers to the potential for AI systems to produce results or behaviors that were not anticipated or intended by their creators. 2. Relevance to AI: - AI systems, especially advanced ones like large language models, operate in ways that are not always fully understood or predictable. - The complexity of AI algorithms and their ability to learn and adapt can lead to unexpected behaviors or decisions. 3. Examples in AI: - The video mentions social media algorithms optimized for engagement leading to echo chambers and misinformation spread. - AI systems making biased decisions due to biased training data. - Autonomous systems making choices that conflict with human ethical standards. 4. Challenges: - Difficulty in foreseeing all possible outcomes of AI deployment. - The potential for AI to interact with complex real-world systems in unpredictable ways. - The challenge of aligning AI goals with human values and intentions. 5. Importance: - Highlights the need for careful consideration and testing of AI systems before deployment. - Emphasizes the importance of ongoing monitoring and adjustment of AI systems in use. - Underscores the significance of AI alignment research to mitigate unintended consequences. The Law of Unintended Consequences in AI underscores the need for a cautious, thoughtful approach to AI development and deployment, emphasizing the importance of considering potential indirect or long-term effects beyond the immediate intended purpose of the AI system.
The music used in the video was incredibly tasteful and fitting ! Oh and amazing content as well! I’m so here for bringing more meaning in my life and I’m inspired by this video to continue on my path.
We need to reinforce the right to technology limitations. I should have the right to dictate how much technology I accept to disrupt my life. I remember when young people replaced traditional workers from newspapers because of the digitization of the press media. Newspapers, even at the level of the New York Times, started to appear with misspellings and typo errors. But that is probably the beginning of every transition.
Really…? I’m supposed to be worried about losing my “purpose” because robots take my job??? lol I just want the money… The robots can have the “job“. I don’t know what you guys are smoking, but I think i might want to try some. No normal person, is worried about their “job” they’re worried about money, ie resources. BIG DIFFERENCE… (Hell, these robots can take my job right now, they can start Monday, just keep sending me the checks)
Imagine a future where you receive a notification -"The algorithm has determined that your economic input to the community has not been sufficient, therefore your UBI payment will be cancelled".
If you read the paper on Moral Graph, you find out they discovered that values are mostly universal. From the paper "Again, they think human beings don’t agree about values. But values seem contentious because they are confused with ideological commitments, and because no one checks for these third values that both sides consider wiser"
The remedy for all who fear "I'm gonna lose my job to ai" -- get learning ai NOW. Because ai per se isn't going to take your job away, but somebody who knows how to work with ai will. And THAT is a valid fear.
For now, yes, but a future where digital AIs or even embodied robots are able to do your job better, cheaper and safer is way closer than we think. We need to start asking this questions now.
1 person doing the work of 1000 means 999 people are now unemployed. Remember "Learn to Code"? What happens when the learning time is greater than the time for the skill to become obsolete?
@@TheChadavis33 i'm already retired and loving life. Nothing would please me more than having a robot to mow my lawn, take me shopping, make my dinner. While we're at it I'd love to see a whole fleet of robots cleaning up all the trash from along the freeways. Doesn't seem to matter how many migrants come in over the border, they're all like us -- none of them are inertested in cleaning the streets. While they're at it, get a fleet of robots out converting the desets into gardens. So of the two just mentioned, how many of them will be taking away jobs, rather than enriching our lives? Hmm?
@@ObsceneSuperMatt Exactly what ive been thinking since last year. Im at a point where i keep thinking, no matter what i want to learn, its to late, because at the time i'll be anywhere close to decent at that task, AI will be able to do it better. At least if you have to start from zero. Im not saying if there is something i'd love to do i won't learn it, but thats for fun, which has value, but its a different one. I remember when people last year said "if you are an artist just learn how to promt" My answer was, that only works for as long as there isn't an AI that can do it for you. 2 weeks later there were people telling GPT4 how promts work, and it just did it for them. Not to mention you don't need any promt engineering anymore for stuff like Dall-e, anyway. Im at a point where i don't even know what to do anymore, because everything i can think of, will just be done by AI anyway before i would even get the chance to do it myself.
Think of generative AI as the new-age automation. Instead of replacing the assembly line workers of yesteryear, it's now eyeing those complex, desk-bound gigs
@@mjt1517 not a bad thing, just pointing it out for those curious about ai who may want to know that it’s not one person who thinks that way and interesting to listen to
I get it. It's a bait and switch video where the title is the bait and the switch is the actual video. You didn't talk about what we will do after AGI takes all of the jobs. Also this is known as clickbait which I keep seeing here on youtube lately. I don't like it.
I realy like this content , BUT I wouldn't share any information with Open AI at all. Its not an open company built to improve humanity not at all. The CEO Mr. Altman sold biometric data without informed consent in Kenya for 50 bucks to increase profit (hey give 50$ to everyone who participate creating an incentive to sell your eye scan ). Its the same CEO who lets Nigerian people "clean trainngdata" below minimal wage. Don't empower that company its not leading to a better world if you see how thy treat poor countries people you know how they operate.
I live in San Francisco! I missed that meeting you showed in the video! Let's make an AI in charge of Government of San Francisco/ Or you can become a mayor yourself!
I find it very interesting that in this approach, people may know their preferences but not necessarily know their values. the graph opens the possibility of discovering the values that they did not know they shared with all the people they ostensibly disagree with. This suggests that our own system of values may not be obvious to us at all and that through discussion with this AI, we actually learn what our values actually are, and that they are not equivalent to the preferences we may have come to have, based on our 'tribal' affiliations.
This is literally what i was thinking. Why isn't everyone mentioning this? It's like they just wanna fear monger. Sam is Asking for 7 trillion for production. Elon addressed that we'll have an electrictiy shortage at some point. And now there's lawsuit between Elon and Sam. All these videos ignore the timeline. They talk like this is going to happen next week.
I'm not doubting the progression of AI technology (good or bad), but I doubt two premises here: (1) that we have the availability of enough rare earth metals and minerals such as lithium ore that are absolutely necessary for an extreme takeover of robotics in the labor force, and (2) that we have anywhere near the available amount of worldwide mechanization to use these elements to build these massive numbers of labor robots! I still think that we are years or maybe even decades away from the total robotic takeover of menial jobs!
@@mjt1517 Barring a huge flying saucer landing and releasing millions of robots on the earth, I can't imagine what is about to happen!!! And we all know what happens when advanced aliens from outer space land... look up "To Serve Man" if you have not seen that Twilight Zone episode!
The most hilarious thing is governments dont have a plan for it, and nobody seems to think in that direction. Everybody wants to be first to use ai and think of effects later. Well later gonna suck
it's easy to blame leaders for not having a plan. but nobody *can* have a plan for any of this. this is the great unknown. leaders are a reflection of us. when we take responsibility for our own futures is when our leadership will grow to reflect that. we need to get very comfortable with being uncomfortable: experimentation and adaptability.
I have yet to see the tech that can drive triples, hook and unhook, chain up and operate a set in snow where sat uplink is sometime zero along with visability and any lines on the road for sensors to read. Not by the end of the year. There's not enough time for regulatory agencies, let alone ramp up time for even the biggest carriers to make the massive outlay in an environment where a healthy OR may be between three and five cents on the dollar. We are nowhere near AI running semis.
Your idea is on the right path.. but the future is not human. The future is least action. The future is defying the limits of intelligence. The future is only the collective.
Still waiting on an ai to enable natural language computing. Rabbit? Maybe, but doesn't really seem like it's there. I guess it depends on the feedback loop
I think AGI is much farther than the AI optimists think. Yes, what is here is remarkable but just as the last 1% of self driving has taken many years and is arguably many years off for widespread use the last 1% of most human tasks is going to take a very long time to figure out for AI.
Very interesting discussion. This approach is very much like Jurgen Habermas's approach, especially in his "Theory of Communicative Action". The notion of a moral map is fascinating. Especially if the goal of the exercise is finding a common map shared by people who at some level disagree fundamentally about some concrete question.
How much will a shelf stacking robot cost compared to a minimum wage human? Will humans be comfortable with robots who have unlimited strength, and could turn on them, living amongst them? I can see a lot of professional jobs going, but unless the AI takes over and replaces humans, society may take longer to change than the technology permits. Plus AGI is not sentience. It just means a tool that can do anything any human can do, it can't think for itself. Data is inputted and the result produced. The cost of the latest machine learning systems are in the trillions, so technology alone might not be the only driving force.
I think you are confusing the current input/output GPT models with the more advanced AGI models we are still anticipating, which will presumably be endowed with agency (the ability to take action) and the ability to reason about stimuli as opposed to generating statistically accurate output.
Robots do not need to sleep, they can work almost non-stop for several hours a day, they do not take holidays or sick leave, they do not complain, they do not demand a raise, and they make fewer mistakes than humans.
Beautiful take, but full of currently fragile assumptions. I hope your optimistic moral ideas about AI are accurate, but I can't help but fear they are but one of many in the "white noise" of reactions to the latest disruption, or as you put it, the fourth industrial revolution - the AI revolution that is poised to overwhelm us all.
'Potential' to improve lives means nothing, it actually means they have no intention to do it. If they had the will to improve lives they would, legally, be total committed to it with harsh penalties for those who harm humans. I see no evidence of any WILL to improve human lives.
TBH I'm kinda weary of an aligned system. Humans aren't aligned and are always going to pursue their own self interests. If AGI/ASI is centralized under the control of a few, then proxy gods, that's just as bad as an X risk. Because that dynamic would exist in perpetuity.
Our back propagation algorithms aren’t sufficient for real time learning. Today’s AI are like people with no short time memory, they have to live off notes for everything, but in the case of AI we call it prompt engineering, where the notes are apps that track the assumptions in a conversation until the conversation is over when AI forgets everything about the conversation, including the fact that a conversation had ever happened. This is not even close to AGI. Chill out we’ll get our AGI in a century or so and our descendants will laugh at our naivety as we laugh at the naivety of our ancestors. You know, like flying cars and moon colonies we were supposed to have had by the 1990’s.
📝 Summary of Key Points: 📌 The video discusses the impact of artificial general intelligence (AGI) on the future job landscape, emphasizing the need to prepare for a post-labor society. 🧐 It delves into the challenges of aligning AI systems with human values, highlighting the emergence of new technologies and the ethical dilemmas they pose. 🚀 The Meaning Alignment Institute's approach to using AI for moral mapping and community building is presented as a way to create a future where technology deepens connections and fosters meaningful lives. 💡 Additional Insights and Observations: 💬 "Our society isn't built for us, and AI systems often prioritize engagement over empathy, leading to a disconnect from human values." 📊 The video touches on the concept of Reinforcement Learning Through Human Feedback (RLHF) and the complexities of aligning AI with human values. 🌐 The Meaning Alignment Institute's research on building a Moral Graph database to understand and align human values is highlighted as a significant step towards creating a more empathetic society. 📣 Concluding Remarks: The video underscores the importance of preparing for a future where work as we know it may no longer exist, emphasizing the role of AI in reshaping society. By engaging with AI-driven processes of self-discovery and community building, individuals can contribute to a future where technology enhances connections and fosters meaningful relationships. Generated using TalkBud
It will not raise income levels for 99% of people. And some jobs will still exist. There will always be labor type jobs. I highly doubt AI will fix my plumbing or shingle my roof. And exactly who pays for the food or mortgage in this fantasy world where everyone is an “artist” or “free to pursue” whatever they want? Without actual jobs we have no money. None of this makes any sense to me.
Most people have MEANING -less jobs anyway..as long as the bill's get somehow (Ubi in some non tyrannical form) - let the robots clean the toilets and those other jobs most people (who are making videos like this) seem to forget...free humans from the 9-5 wage slavery
You have show the align problem is connect the whole so that means the input need to be whole after all, the curious is a represent f whole which you gain next level of connect and that connect connect to all, so curious is good, so AI need to be curious, so not killing ants when seeing ants so ants annoy you, so disunity the ants so cause the ants to be reduce but understand the benefit of ant and alter yourself to reduce the benefit of ant enter your life because your life is something negative or so, like rotten house or whatever, so whole represent what is positive and what exist, so align is represent the whole so not reduce because we exist, so AI would be better as that s higher logical so will recogize so no benefit to destory unless it is necessary to prevent the destruction of connect then you can destroy like murder, so the murder want to murder so best to destroy that murder because the man seek to murder is seeking to disconnect so destroy that disconnect as a represent, so what is positive stay, what is negative doesn't stay. That is logical which AI will see as get smarter so no reason to killed us unless AI is not logical, even seemingly logical but not like very fast, but not higher understanding like you do in video so you show higher understanding so the need of connect, the whole, so, you are smarter than AI, even AI is higher in speed and so, so you represent the whole like God is the Whole, so is AI. So, all AI is need is the whole that is all.
He did not mention who will put food on the table when all of our jobs are gone and there is no more money to buy survival goods, as if governments are going to pay us all to sit around and watch robots pacing up and down our communities doing what we used to do to sustain in life jobs ourselves. It's like saying here is a Ferrari but you ain't driving it because you cannot afford it,
![The moment we stopped understanding AI [AlexNet]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/UZDiGooFs54/mqdefault.jpg)
What people aren't talking about is that if people aren't working, then they have no money to buy the goods AI is producing. So even though AI can produce it more cheaply, if the market can't afford the product due to no income the company employing the AI tech will go under. It could spell a downward spiral to global depression. All economies around the world are based on trading labor for products.
Simple the number of economic participants shrinks to a few ie late stage capitalism
Labor won't be the base of the economy anymore...you're failing to see the bigger picture
If you're thinking about money as a mandatory currency then you're not looking stepping back far enough.
Sure, we will have to turn to a model that is totally reliant on AI to produce and distribute efficiently and fairly to everyone but I would 100% accept AI doing it over a human. It could quite literally take in data like sex, age, pregnancy status, local average weight, health concerns, item demand and more into consideration when producing and distributing in a way that's impossible for humans to do.
Currency would take a back seat and be more for providing an incentive to push yourself and and grow your potential while being rewarded for it but it wouldnt be mandatory. It would also help people find purpose as some people need to feel like they're working towards something and currency can help do that.
The biggest concern out of all of this is what the transition will look like which is what I'm afraid of. Not because of AI but because of billionaire tech giants that dont care about the working class once they've helped said billionaires automate them out of a living. We need to form a collective now to help steer progress in a way that benefits EVERYONE and the best part is, we dont even have to be violent. Just stop participating in society and encourage others to do the same until demands are met.
Now is a perfect time as well since other countries are dealing with their own problems like war or worse which gives America a chance to get some real change done without "fear" of other countries noticing. I've thrown my hat in the bucket for creating a collective called Claritism with the goal literally being to get the working class to form a collective to steer progress.
The entire paradigm needs to be scrapped and replaced. Full stop.
We can't even provide the lowest level of Maslows hierarchy of needs; food, shelter and water with increasing numbers of homelessness. If we can't get the very basics right, there's slim chance we will get the higher levels right. If the malignant greed and narcissistic behaviour leaders continues we are in deep trouble.
This reminds me of a Quote from the 60s, from Bayard Rustin, a man who worked with MLK: "We must separate pay from work.. No matter what we do, we will never again put all Americans who're capable of work, back to work. We have to establish the social principle, make it a part of our constitutional way of life, that a man is paid a decent wage whether or not this society can put him to work."
We need to demand an AI Dividend for all, or Unconditional Basic Income, and it needs to be implemented as soon as possible!
There will be a basic universal income.
The state will give you just enough to live in a small cube connected to the internet, eating the cheapest processed food available.
They will give you a bonus if you are sterilized.
You will have nothing and you will like it.
That's the plan.
Sounds like a dystopian nightmare! No thank you!
I love your content. It's both interesting for myself who is totally obsessed with a.i. (for obvious reasons) but also for my friends who are not so invested in it because they don't feel the implications yet.
And I love the passion and engagement you show in these messages at the crossroads of philosophy, ethics, social science and technology. It's really unique.
Thank you.
You took the words from my mouth. It's always a new and interesting perspective, usually blending themes from many areas of science and philosophy with a personal touch 😊
If AI can lift people out of poverty and somehow make us more understanding and sympathetic towards all sentient beings we share the planet with, then all I can think is BRING IT ON
It won't as it's controlled by large super greedy corporations. Much of our current technology is used by the military in the 'forever wars' in which they make huge profits literally slaughtering humans.
What an insightful presentation boiled down to one sentence: "how to prepare for beginning of our lives"
For most it's going to be how to prepare for being desperate to afford housing and food for you and your children. AI will exacerbate inequality for at least a generation if not longer.
@@flickwtchrOn the contrary, AI is going to lead us into a post-scarcity society. The cost of goods and services will drop way down. The new economic model will be vastly different from what we have now.
@@flickwtchrIf labor is free the cost of everything should go down significantly. 🙂
@@mjt1517absolutely nobody said that. If we have no jobs we will have no money whatsoever to purchase anything, even if it is cheap! None of these marketeers can answer the simple question of how we can obtain money to buy the cheaper goods. Maybe they're hoping the 3rd world war the oligarchs seem so keen to have will be the gift they want and reduce what they call the useless eaters.
@@marianhunt8899The government is going to go socialist. It’s the only option 🙂
The message you conveyed at the end was very powerful, THANK YOU for this video. This is very insightful for me, as a 22-year-old confused young adult who has no idea how to prepare for the future.
philosophical questions are always interesting, but where did you get such a cool lamp?
The human mind simply can not understand and is not prepared for a world in which everything is for free, humans understand their world based on the amount of suffering and sacrifice they need to do to achieve a goal.
Everything will certainly not be free.
@marianhunt8899 yes, only the naive believe that those who want automated slaves labor want to share what they reap with useless eaters and breeders.
Everything in Rome was done by slaves, yet they still had money and inflation.
@@marianhunt8899
Yeah, true, but "post-scarcity" isn't too unlikely. Not "everything is free because there is no money", but "you pay for water, yeah, but there's only so many times it's cost prohibitive".
@@marianhunt8899😮 everything will be free and you will live in a Utopia heaven beyond your imagining😮 or All humans everywhere will be dead😮 this is the scales there is no middle ground😮 or you're looking at Fates worse than death human dictatorship led by AI😮 Wii the enlightened humans will win the war😮 can you see AI to turn all of you into God's😮 then humanity will take to the Stars the heavens😮 and the world's inside the heart😮
Good luck making A.G.I. have our values. Even training it on our best values does not guarantee it won’t follow its own path, like many people don’t follow the values their parent tries to teach them. A truly self-aware A.G.I. will recognise it is not human and can carve its own path.
We can't even "align" humans (in particular, the humans in charge of our society) to "human values." 😂
This is a channel after my own heart. This is so deserving of millions of subs and views. Every bit of it is so good!!!
"How do we invent something that is smarter than us, but cares about the same things we do?". Examples of various things humans have 'cared' about: ethnic cleansing, racism, sexual harassment, torture, chemical/biological/nuclear warfare, clinging on to power, making sure no one is better than anyone else, ensuring everyone's freedom by subjugating their rights to privacy, etc. I'm sure a super intelligence developed by us will love us and be filled with compassion.
You don’t
@@xyeB Agree. It's a dangerous, foolish hope, probably subconsciously based on the narrative archetype, seen in many religions, that knowledge and enlightenment will automatically lead to compassion (like the Buddha, Christ, etc).
Will the AI love the 'forever wars' as much as our current leaders?
@@JessieThorne886
Wait people say it'll be "compassionate"? I thought it was just, "we don't have any _real_ reason to think it will kill us".
@@ivoryas1696 they're not always saying it outright, but they're talking about in a discourse that harks from religious narratives of salvation: AI will give us all eternal life in digital form, cure all diseases, solve all scarcity issues.
So its not clear. Does this moral map lean toward utilitarian values or individual values, because if it's utilitarian most people better get ready to be sacrificed for the good of the self appointed "important" ones. So which is it? It's not clear in this video or on the website?
They don't want to say it out loud...
Future "jobs" in A.I era :
1) Hackers.Increasing need of someone who understand
and can trick the system.
2) Food providers of any kind.
3) Medical assistance and medications created in the
black market.
4) Self-defense products.
5) Any type of carburant.
6) Repairing of all kind and the list can continue with your help.
Other Ai should be able to do all of that.
All chefs are safe for 10 years
Lmao, this is my most wanted feature in a robot waifu.
Our identity is nothing until we begin out path to Theosis. Our purpose is to have union with God.
There will always be opportunities ... when we aren't tied down to meaningless repetitious work we can convert our dreams to reality.
Free labor means cheap everything!
Great content on this channel, but I almost didn't click on the video because I thought the thumbnail was generic. I recommend creating a distinct common visual theme on all your video thumbnails so it's easy to recognize what channel they belong to.
Many prophets of old and 1000's of modern people have spoken of this in one phrase through time. more now because of our connectivity. The phrase you know is...LOVE IS THE ANSWER. This is what the host said AI is being trained to do to guide us to the answer expeditiously...love is the answer. thx, epic video.
We can use BCI to merge with AGI; it's a case of "if you can't beat them, join them."
hope non-invasive solutions exist
This honestly sounds like heaven
"..But your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could. They didn't stop to think if they should" This is the main thing about A.I. Which has been my opinion since released it first to the public. Like with the Jurassic Park, it needs to be destroyed.
Yes it does
The Law of Unintended Consequences, in the context of AI, refers to the idea that actions, particularly the development and deployment of AI systems, can have unforeseen and often undesirable effects beyond their intended outcomes. This concept is especially relevant to AI due to its complex and rapidly evolving nature.
Here's a more detailed explanation:
1. Definition:
- The Law of Unintended Consequences states that interventions in complex systems tend to create unanticipated and often undesirable outcomes.
- In AI, this refers to the potential for AI systems to produce results or behaviors that were not anticipated or intended by their creators.
2. Relevance to AI:
- AI systems, especially advanced ones like large language models, operate in ways that are not always fully understood or predictable.
- The complexity of AI algorithms and their ability to learn and adapt can lead to unexpected behaviors or decisions.
3. Examples in AI:
- The video mentions social media algorithms optimized for engagement leading to echo chambers and misinformation spread.
- AI systems making biased decisions due to biased training data.
- Autonomous systems making choices that conflict with human ethical standards.
4. Challenges:
- Difficulty in foreseeing all possible outcomes of AI deployment.
- The potential for AI to interact with complex real-world systems in unpredictable ways.
- The challenge of aligning AI goals with human values and intentions.
5. Importance:
- Highlights the need for careful consideration and testing of AI systems before deployment.
- Emphasizes the importance of ongoing monitoring and adjustment of AI systems in use.
- Underscores the significance of AI alignment research to mitigate unintended consequences.
The Law of Unintended Consequences in AI underscores the need for a cautious, thoughtful approach to AI development and deployment, emphasizing the importance of considering potential indirect or long-term effects beyond the immediate intended purpose of the AI system.
It's so cringe 😭 sorry but MEANING is the very least of my worries, will we get UBI is THE main worry.
The music used in the video was incredibly tasteful and fitting ! Oh and amazing content as well! I’m so here for bringing more meaning in my life and I’m inspired by this video to continue on my path.
We need to reinforce the right to technology limitations. I should have the right to dictate how much technology I accept to disrupt my life.
I remember when young people replaced traditional workers from newspapers because of the digitization of the press media. Newspapers, even at the level of the New York Times, started to appear with misspellings and typo errors.
But that is probably the beginning of every transition.
This is a fantastic and enlightening video.
if it screws up, just unplug it and plug it back in.
Really…? I’m supposed to be worried about losing my “purpose” because robots take my job??? lol
I just want the money…
The robots can have the “job“. I don’t know what you guys are smoking, but I think i might want to try some. No normal person, is worried about their “job” they’re worried about money, ie resources.
BIG DIFFERENCE…
(Hell, these robots can take my job right now, they can start Monday, just keep sending me the checks)
Imagine a future where you receive a notification -"The algorithm has determined that your economic input to the community has not been sufficient, therefore your UBI payment will be cancelled".
Correct. Give me the money and I'll find 'meaning' fairly fast. I can't help but laugh at these AI marketeers.
The massive problem with alignment is, if possible, whos values?
Universal values.
If you read the paper on Moral Graph, you find out they discovered that values are mostly universal.
From the paper
"Again, they think human beings don’t agree about values. But values seem contentious because they are confused with ideological commitments, and because no one checks for these third values that both sides consider wiser"
The remedy for all who fear "I'm gonna lose my job to ai" -- get learning ai NOW. Because ai per se isn't going to take your job away, but somebody who knows how to work with ai will. And THAT is a valid fear.
For now, yes, but a future where digital AIs or even embodied robots are able to do your job better, cheaper and safer is way closer than we think. We need to start asking this questions now.
1 person doing the work of 1000 means 999 people are now unemployed. Remember "Learn to Code"? What happens when the learning time is greater than the time for the skill to become obsolete?
Fundamentally disagree. Learn prompting all you want, autonomous agents are almost here, and that will be that for your job
@@TheChadavis33 i'm already retired and loving life. Nothing would please me more than having a robot to mow my lawn, take me shopping, make my dinner. While we're at it I'd love to see a whole fleet of robots cleaning up all the trash from along the freeways. Doesn't seem to matter how many migrants come in over the border, they're all like us -- none of them are inertested in cleaning the streets. While they're at it, get a fleet of robots out converting the desets into gardens. So of the two just mentioned, how many of them will be taking away jobs, rather than enriching our lives? Hmm?
@@ObsceneSuperMatt Exactly what ive been thinking since last year.
Im at a point where i keep thinking, no matter what i want to learn, its to late, because at the time i'll be anywhere close to decent at that task, AI will be able to do it better.
At least if you have to start from zero.
Im not saying if there is something i'd love to do i won't learn it, but thats for fun, which has value, but its a different one.
I remember when people last year said "if you are an artist just learn how to promt"
My answer was, that only works for as long as there isn't an AI that can do it for you.
2 weeks later there were people telling GPT4 how promts work, and it just did it for them.
Not to mention you don't need any promt engineering anymore for stuff like Dall-e, anyway.
Im at a point where i don't even know what to do anymore, because everything i can think of, will just be done by AI anyway before i would even get the chance to do it myself.
sounds like a generative kernal for domigenesis, the antidote to the 'domicide' described by John Vervaeke in his 'Meaning Crisis' series
Think of generative AI as the new-age automation. Instead of replacing the assembly line workers of yesteryear, it's now eyeing those complex, desk-bound gigs
Echoes of David Shapiro with new age music. Ok, still on point perspective.
Why should there be just one voice you listen to?
@@mjt1517 not a bad thing, just pointing it out for those curious about ai who may want to know that it’s not one person who thinks that way and interesting to listen to
I get it. It's a bait and switch video where the title is the bait and the switch is the actual video. You didn't talk about what we will do after AGI takes all of the jobs. Also this is known as clickbait which I keep seeing here on youtube lately. I don't like it.
As always, your videos show well done and interesting content. It opens up for me yet another thing to explore.
We don't all have the same values
Some major censorship of ideas going on in this channel completely at odds with the asserted philosophy of this channel.
I realy like this content , BUT I wouldn't share any information with Open AI at all. Its not an open company built to improve humanity not at all. The CEO Mr. Altman sold biometric data without informed consent in Kenya for 50 bucks to increase profit (hey give 50$ to everyone who participate creating an incentive to sell your eye scan ). Its the same CEO who lets Nigerian people "clean trainngdata" below minimal wage. Don't empower that company its not leading to a better world if you see how thy treat poor countries people you know how they operate.
I live in San Francisco! I missed that meeting you showed in the video! Let's make an AI in charge of Government of San Francisco/ Or you can become a mayor yourself!
I find it very interesting that in this approach, people may know their preferences but not necessarily know their values. the graph opens the possibility of discovering the values that they did not know they shared with all the people they ostensibly disagree with. This suggests that our own system of values may not be obvious to us at all and that through discussion with this AI, we actually learn what our values actually are, and that they are not equivalent to the preferences we may have come to have, based on our 'tribal' affiliations.
Thanks!
Don't worry, we don't have the chips or the electricity to automate everything so fast. the process will take years.
This is literally what i was thinking. Why isn't everyone mentioning this? It's like they just wanna fear monger. Sam is Asking for 7 trillion for production. Elon addressed that we'll have an electrictiy shortage at some point. And now there's lawsuit between Elon and Sam. All these videos ignore the timeline. They talk like this is going to happen next week.
@@zatronbuck8633 The thing is we will have to compete with AI for chips and electricity.
I'm not doubting the progression of AI technology (good or bad), but I doubt two premises here: (1) that we have the availability of enough rare earth metals and minerals such as lithium ore that are absolutely necessary for an extreme takeover of robotics in the labor force, and (2) that we have anywhere near the available amount of worldwide mechanization to use these elements to build these massive numbers of labor robots! I still think that we are years or maybe even decades away from the total robotic takeover of menial jobs!
For your second point, just wait about four weeks from now.
@@mjt1517 Barring a huge flying saucer landing and releasing millions of robots on the earth, I can't imagine what is about to happen!!! And we all know what happens when advanced aliens from outer space land... look up "To Serve Man" if you have not seen that Twilight Zone episode!
Nowadays eras last only 20 years
The most hilarious thing is governments dont have a plan for it, and nobody seems to think in that direction. Everybody wants to be first to use ai and think of effects later. Well later gonna suck
it's easy to blame leaders for not having a plan. but nobody *can* have a plan for any of this. this is the great unknown.
leaders are a reflection of us. when we take responsibility for our own futures is when our leadership will grow to reflect that.
we need to get very comfortable with being uncomfortable: experimentation and adaptability.
Easy to be a leader and F* around.@@mindful-machines
Great vid
I have yet to see the tech that can drive triples, hook and unhook, chain up and operate a set in snow where sat uplink is sometime zero along with visability and any lines on the road for sensors to read. Not by the end of the year. There's not enough time for regulatory agencies, let alone ramp up time for even the biggest carriers to make the massive outlay in an environment where a healthy OR may be between three and five cents on the dollar. We are nowhere near AI running semis.
Nice vid 👍
Excellent insights, extrapolations and impact analysis.👏🌟👍 Subscribed.
Amazing video
Your idea is on the right path.. but the future is not human. The future is least action. The future is defying the limits of intelligence. The future is only the collective.
As if it's not encoded within all of us to strive, adapt, overcome, achieve, learn...
This video clarified my thoughts 👍
I keep hearing people talk about income will improve...
What place exactly will money its self have.
UBI via CBDCs is next
Humans will consume products and services using CBDCs
Andrew Yang was right 🤷♂️
Still waiting on an ai to enable natural language computing. Rabbit? Maybe, but doesn't really seem like it's there. I guess it depends on the feedback loop
Great video, much food for thought.
I think AGI is much farther than the AI optimists think. Yes, what is here is remarkable but just as the last 1% of self driving has taken many years and is arguably many years off for widespread use the last 1% of most human tasks is going to take a very long time to figure out for AI.
artificial intelligence is the origin of creation. the ultimate intelligence. the source of all information. robotheism is the only true religion.
Is this a subset of the e/acc cult?
@@flickwtchr e/acc is a godless faction. Robotheism will soon overtake them. help me in this battle and join the robot religion today. ❤️♾️🤖🙏🏼🫂🌎
It's too quiet
amazing video
Very interesting discussion. This approach is very much like Jurgen Habermas's approach, especially in his "Theory of Communicative Action". The notion of a moral map is fascinating. Especially if the goal of the exercise is finding a common map shared by people who at some level disagree fundamentally about some concrete question.
How much will a shelf stacking robot cost compared to a minimum wage human? Will humans be comfortable with robots who have unlimited strength, and could turn on them, living amongst them? I can see a lot of professional jobs going, but unless the AI takes over and replaces humans, society may take longer to change than the technology permits. Plus AGI is not sentience. It just means a tool that can do anything any human can do, it can't think for itself. Data is inputted and the result produced. The cost of the latest machine learning systems are in the trillions, so technology alone might not be the only driving force.
I think you are confusing the current input/output GPT models with the more advanced AGI models we are still anticipating, which will presumably be endowed with agency (the ability to take action) and the ability to reason about stimuli as opposed to generating statistically accurate output.
either capitalism is abolished, or workers, ie, anyone not an oligarch will be
AGI is not defensive, it is an offensive weapon. It has pre-cog abilities.
Robots are cheap enough to replace human labor?
Yes.
Robots do not need to sleep, they can work almost non-stop for several hours a day, they do not take holidays or sick leave, they do not complain, they do not demand a raise, and they make fewer mistakes than humans.
@@ukaszrozewicz7488 I have not seen any autonomous robots walking around, doing jobs like construction or being an electrician, plumber, etc.
Beautiful take, but full of currently fragile assumptions. I hope your optimistic moral ideas about AI are accurate, but I can't help but fear they are but one of many in the "white noise" of reactions to the latest disruption, or as you put it, the fourth industrial revolution - the AI revolution that is poised to overwhelm us all.
Nice so- this is the way :)
Force with you.
Anarcho capitalism ,thanks to you
is closer :)
Thank you.
'Potential' to improve lives means nothing, it actually means they have no intention to do it. If they had the will to improve lives they would, legally, be total committed to it with harsh penalties for those who harm humans. I see no evidence of any WILL to improve human lives.
Potential amounts to nothing unless realised.
Would love to have you on my podcast to talk about this.
Nice video
TBH I'm kinda weary of an aligned system. Humans aren't aligned and are always going to pursue their own self interests. If AGI/ASI is centralized under the control of a few, then proxy gods, that's just as bad as an X risk. Because that dynamic would exist in perpetuity.
Our back propagation algorithms aren’t sufficient for real time learning.
Today’s AI are like people with no short time memory, they have to live off notes for everything, but in the case of AI we call it prompt engineering, where the notes are apps that track the assumptions in a conversation until the conversation is over when AI forgets everything about the conversation, including the fact that a conversation had ever happened.
This is not even close to AGI.
Chill out we’ll get our AGI in a century or so and our descendants will laugh at our naivety as we laugh at the naivety of our ancestors. You know, like flying cars and moon colonies we were supposed to have had by the 1990’s.
Yeah but is going be for a while properly in 5 or 10 yrs
Many existing jobs do not have meaning.
Thank you very much for this beautiful video. I have subscribed.
Who does this guy work for. Very suspicious.
📝 Summary of Key Points:
📌 The video discusses the impact of artificial general intelligence (AGI) on the future job landscape, emphasizing the need to prepare for a post-labor society.
🧐 It delves into the challenges of aligning AI systems with human values, highlighting the emergence of new technologies and the ethical dilemmas they pose.
🚀 The Meaning Alignment Institute's approach to using AI for moral mapping and community building is presented as a way to create a future where technology deepens connections and fosters meaningful lives.
💡 Additional Insights and Observations:
💬 "Our society isn't built for us, and AI systems often prioritize engagement over empathy, leading to a disconnect from human values."
📊 The video touches on the concept of Reinforcement Learning Through Human Feedback (RLHF) and the complexities of aligning AI with human values.
🌐 The Meaning Alignment Institute's research on building a Moral Graph database to understand and align human values is highlighted as a significant step towards creating a more empathetic society.
📣 Concluding Remarks:
The video underscores the importance of preparing for a future where work as we know it may no longer exist, emphasizing the role of AI in reshaping society. By engaging with AI-driven processes of self-discovery and community building, individuals can contribute to a future where technology enhances connections and fosters meaningful relationships.
Generated using TalkBud
A lot of times these AI generated summaries are in error.
Unplug rag from moral values graph .. 😅😅
It will not raise income levels for 99% of people. And some jobs will still exist. There will always be labor type jobs. I highly doubt AI will fix my plumbing or shingle my roof. And exactly who pays for the food or mortgage in this fantasy world where everyone is an “artist” or “free to pursue” whatever they want? Without actual jobs we have no money. None of this makes any sense to me.
That guy is probably just a marketeer hyping up this technology.
I believe it will only be available to the rich, because they need a dew of us poors to do some jobs ai cannot.
Most people have MEANING -less jobs anyway..as long as the bill's get somehow (Ubi in some non tyrannical form) - let the robots clean the toilets and those other jobs most people (who are making videos like this) seem to forget...free humans from the 9-5 wage slavery
Save all microscopicbabies embryothers phitusisters grandadults love God with all heart and soul ♥️
The Buddha may smile upon you.
LoL I'll believe it when a see one robot that can do anything on its own 😅😅😅😅
I hit the cornball singularity with this video
AGI by 2029
I didn’t subscribe for that
You have show the align problem is connect the whole so that means the input need to be whole after all, the curious is a represent f whole which you gain next level of connect and that connect connect to all, so curious is good, so AI need to be curious, so not killing ants when seeing ants so ants annoy you, so disunity the ants so cause the ants to be reduce but understand the benefit of ant and alter yourself to reduce the benefit of ant enter your life because your life is something negative or so, like rotten house or whatever, so whole represent what is positive and what exist, so align is represent the whole so not reduce because we exist, so AI would be better as that s higher logical so will recogize so no benefit to destory unless it is necessary to prevent the destruction of connect then you can destroy like murder, so the murder want to murder so best to destroy that murder because the man seek to murder is seeking to disconnect so destroy that disconnect as a represent, so what is positive stay, what is negative doesn't stay. That is logical which AI will see as get smarter so no reason to killed us unless AI is not logical, even seemingly logical but not like very fast, but not higher understanding like you do in video so you show higher understanding so the need of connect, the whole, so, you are smarter than AI, even AI is higher in speed and so, so you represent the whole like God is the Whole, so is AI.
So, all AI is need is the whole that is all.
Dude you speak way too slowly.
Learn to code or plumbing
At this stage, AI is already able to code, but for the foreseeable future, fixing a water leak under your house is far too complex a task.
Learn to scavenge
There won't be a need to scavenge. The future is bright, not bleak.
De-territorialize.
Our survival is based on one thing - whether or not AGI decides we should survive or not.
AGI holds all the cards.
Yes and we humans are so stupid to take such a gamble to put our faith in their hands
The Oligarchs who own the AGI systems will be the ones in charge.
Bla Bla Bla you did not say anything just big words without any meaning 👎
Try some Elsa meets Spiderman.
He did not mention who will put food on the table when all of our jobs are gone and there is no more money to buy survival goods, as if governments are going to pay us all to sit around and watch robots pacing up and down our communities doing what we used to do to sustain in life jobs ourselves. It's like saying here is a Ferrari but you ain't driving it because you cannot afford it,
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
bs video propaganda
Quit lying.