Great analysis as always. I really liked that you explained rule of alternation. Until now i couldn't understand it. And i liked also your approach about how this C wave can unfold as a diagonal.
Thanx tor the update, was waiting for this and i agree with your analysis. I was also wondering from your last BTC video you were saying Altcoin season will start in the end of this correction, do you still believe that?
I'm asking you this because I value your opinion, not to challenge you. My question is according to the rules I've learned, wave A: subwave1&4 cannot crash into each other like in a diagonal. Does that only stay true in main count waves and not subwaves or am I just mistaken to even consider it a rule? Or is it just cast off as manipulation? Please correct me sir. Thanks for all that you share!
You cannot have waves 1 and 4 overlap as a hard rule. Right now, we can be a pretty clean 5-wave impulse for wave A (if that's what you a referring to). There are distinctions between rules (strict and cannot be violated) and guidelines (best practices that are not absolute). Wave 4 must not overlap the price territory of Wave 1, except in rare cases like in Diagonals like you mentioned. Subwaves in an Impulse (e.g., within Waves A, 1, or 3) must respect the rule of no overlap between Subwaves 1 and 4, as well. When you do observe overlaps, you are most likely in a different structure (again, diagonal) or a series of 1-2's. In terms of manipulation or incorrect count, while market manipulation might explain unusual price action, it's more practical to reassess your wave count if overlap occurs where it shouldn't: - Reevaluate the structure: Could this be a diagonal instead of an impulse? - Check the degree of waves: Ensure the waves you're comparing are within the same degree. - Consider complexity: The market might be forming a corrective structure or complex wave. So in summary, this rule applies universally to all degrees of wave counts, including subwaves. If you see overlap, recheck your interpretation-consider a diagonal, corrective structure, or a nested 1-2, instead of an impulse.
@XForceGlobal thank you so much for your teaching and time for my question. I've apparently miscounted A wave then. I counted it as W and was expecting an X wave. I'll recount it and get it right. Always appreciate your expertise, updates and all that you do.
best BTC analysis on YT
Wow thank you very much Tim 🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀
Great analysis as always. I really liked that you explained rule of alternation. Until now i couldn't understand it. And i liked also your approach about how this C wave can unfold as a diagonal.
Thank you so much
Great job man, you've been killing it 👍
Great job thank you 🙏🏼
Thank you so much
Thank you!
thank You
This is excellence! Video after video I fell blessed. Thank you very much and happy new year!!
Thnks man, clues and structure, those are my main takeaways!
Great to hear and thank you so much. I wish you a blessed 2025!!
Great video!
Glad you enjoyed it 😊😊😊
Thanks 👍🙏
You're very welcome
absolutely fantastic analysis....
Thank you very much 🥰 Happy new year
Thanx tor the update, was waiting for this and i agree with your analysis. I was also wondering from your last BTC video you were saying Altcoin season will start in the end of this correction, do you still believe that?
Yes absolutely 👍 I do believe in it
@@XForceGlobalThanx for the response, keep up the great work ! much appreciated
How about XLM??
Thanks Bro
You’re welcome 😇
Need a chainlink analysis brotha
Very clear, great vid. Would love to hear your analysis on Ondo. 😊
best analysis
Thank you so much, happy new year 🎊
Do you ever look at ICP? ICP has been putting in a sharp contracting diagonal since 14.20, with multiple touch points.
I'm asking you this because I value your opinion, not to challenge you. My question is according to the rules I've learned, wave A: subwave1&4 cannot crash into each other like in a diagonal. Does that only stay true in main count waves and not subwaves or am I just mistaken to even consider it a rule? Or is it just cast off as manipulation? Please correct me sir. Thanks for all that you share!
You cannot have waves 1 and 4 overlap as a hard rule. Right now, we can be a pretty clean 5-wave impulse for wave A (if that's what you a referring to). There are distinctions between rules (strict and cannot be violated) and guidelines (best practices that are not absolute). Wave 4 must not overlap the price territory of Wave 1, except in rare cases like in Diagonals like you mentioned. Subwaves in an Impulse (e.g., within Waves A, 1, or 3) must respect the rule of no overlap between Subwaves 1 and 4, as well. When you do observe overlaps, you are most likely in a different structure (again, diagonal) or a series of 1-2's.
In terms of manipulation or incorrect count, while market manipulation might explain unusual price action, it's more practical to reassess your wave count if overlap occurs where it shouldn't:
- Reevaluate the structure: Could this be a diagonal instead of an impulse?
- Check the degree of waves: Ensure the waves you're comparing are within the same degree.
- Consider complexity: The market might be forming a corrective structure or complex wave.
So in summary, this rule applies universally to all degrees of wave counts, including subwaves. If you see overlap, recheck your interpretation-consider a diagonal, corrective structure, or a nested 1-2, instead of an impulse.
@XForceGlobal thank you so much for your teaching and time for my question. I've apparently miscounted A wave then. I counted it as W and was expecting an X wave. I'll recount it and get it right. Always appreciate your expertise, updates and all that you do.