Відео

Do I have to disagree? No. Because it’s my own view. Thx

@@XForceGlobal so in your view xrp will hit 20-50? Interesting

I’m saying it’s a possibility just based on wave counts.

@@XForceGlobal I like your optimism but u gotta be realistic with ur viewers but its your opinion and choice anyway I enjoy your videos . Keep it up

Hi! Instead of the RSI, I would use the volume as the combined indicator if you are trying to validate a triangle (although RSI has proven in many cases to be useful, it’s oscillated making it hard to prove as time goes on). In terms of the timeframe for both volume and rsi, since we are in a smaller degree, the 15m and 1H timeframe proves to be the most useful. In terms of w1 of w5 of w3, I am not exactly sure what you are referring to, but it shouldn’t matter as any higher degree will get resolved the same way for this impulse. We are currently looking for how the current 5-wave is going to get resolved before we can discuss how the larger degree will get resolved. SFP is difficult to assess in real time, so I can’t add much there as it would be too hypothetical at that point. I hope I have addressed all of your points!

@XForceGlobal Yes you did👍Thank you for such exprehensive explanation.

Glad you enjoyed it!

Not sure what you mean, but okay

Thank you for your input. The SEC case is such a drag~! But I'm still hopeful even if it doesn't go in their favor with the upcoming follow up. I think the regulatory framework they are setting in the overall picture is what matters. I've explained this in my previous XRP videos, but the technicals show that the markets still want XRP with or without the SEC case.

You're welcome! Triangles are prone to truncations (failure of the wave E). It doesn't have to meet the trendline.

@@XForceGlobal Got you. Thanks!

You're welcome!! It doesn't have to equal in time, but it does help fulfill the overall symmetry of wave structures in the 5-wave impulse. We do have a pretty good minimum time fulfillment so far!

I'm not tracking the time expectation as we already had a long 1-2 wave in terms of time. As long as it's not TOO long in time, and has a good look overall, then we can continue to assume we are still in a 3-wave corrective wave for BTC!

Very good possibility:)!!

Thanks Momaz<3

The “guideline” (not rule) of alternation is hard to prove in real time as stated in my previous Bitcoin video! But good job for trying to apply the context 👍 Yes, it should be at least considered that the double zz is still in play, which is why I show that scenario. It’s just based on the expectation that both scenarios are in play with balance. What I do notice is that on the lower degrees, it seems to be less respected, but it’s still hard to prove in that sense too. We’ll just have to see. But for now, the triangle does seem to be proving itself from a validity perspective and doesn’t have to fully fulfill alternation guidelines.

To add: as a critic myself of the theory, I have focused more on the time and depth of the correction first, then apply the guideline of alternation to help increase probabilities. This means that if one or the other in terms of time or depth of the correction is fulfilled to a certain degree, that would be the priority before applying the guideline of alternation.

@XForceGlobal thanks for the detailed answer mate. Didnt realize it was a guideline to be honest. I do prefer the triangle but depends on the btc i guess. Eitherway we will be ready :)

@@Blue_8800 Absolutely, keep an eye for the next shorter timeframe update on Bitcoin!!!!! <3

We shall see, tough times

@@XForceGlobal ez 9 to 13 dollars Q1.. xrp wont drop 1.5

@@dj-gf9co would be a dream come true!! <3

@@XForceGlobal will happen ! last leg up !

Anything but fartcoin

XRP XLM HBAR ALGO LCX

You are most certainly welcome brother

Thank you so much

Easy for anyone say that, now that we retraced it lol

Yes absolutely 👍 I do believe in it

@@XForceGlobalThanx for the response, keep up the great work ! much appreciated

Glad you enjoyed it 😊😊😊

Wow thank you very much Tim 🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀

Great to hear and thank you so much. I wish you a blessed 2025!!

Thank you very much 🥰 Happy new year

Thank you so much, happy new year 🎊

You’re welcome 😇

You cannot have waves 1 and 4 overlap as a hard rule. Right now, we can be a pretty clean 5-wave impulse for wave A (if that's what you a referring to). There are distinctions between rules (strict and cannot be violated) and guidelines (best practices that are not absolute). Wave 4 must not overlap the price territory of Wave 1, except in rare cases like in Diagonals like you mentioned. Subwaves in an Impulse (e.g., within Waves A, 1, or 3) must respect the rule of no overlap between Subwaves 1 and 4, as well. When you do observe overlaps, you are most likely in a different structure (again, diagonal) or a series of 1-2's. In terms of manipulation or incorrect count, while market manipulation might explain unusual price action, it's more practical to reassess your wave count if overlap occurs where it shouldn't: - Reevaluate the structure: Could this be a diagonal instead of an impulse? - Check the degree of waves: Ensure the waves you're comparing are within the same degree. - Consider complexity: The market might be forming a corrective structure or complex wave. So in summary, this rule applies universally to all degrees of wave counts, including subwaves. If you see overlap, recheck your interpretation-consider a diagonal, corrective structure, or a nested 1-2, instead of an impulse.

@XForceGlobal thank you so much for your teaching and time for my question. I've apparently miscounted A wave then. I counted it as W and was expecting an X wave. I'll recount it and get it right. Always appreciate your expertise, updates and all that you do.

You're very welcome

Thank you so much

Most will be in total complete silence once it moves up. A retracement is very healthy after a 500% pump, lol.

You’re correct, each level is skeptical as it goes higher but we have seen xrp do the unthinkable.

At that point btc would already be at a higher level. It’s not impossible, but you are correct. Anyways, the market cap argument is a thing of the past imo

Hi sorry about that, the targets are very general to begin with. The fib levels are what matters and the conservative/ambitious zones are where the major fib levels align. Thanks

Diamond hands

👇👇👇👇

You're welcome

The more you question, the more your portfolio suffers