Normaly no one pro-war. ut that will come to bite them later on because like in the Asia, There are lot of silent conflict and dispute. We just not dumb as Russia to go to full war
India is not a new neutral. It has always been non aligned. Though the U.S. support for Pakistan had occasionally pushed it slightly towards USSR in the past.
Nice scam you got there. India joins Quad, a military alliance, and you are saying that they are non aligned? Remember when war first started in the middle east between Israel and the other? India first move is to voice their support for Israel? Non aligned Indeed. How about some honesty?
India now is more pro US than it's ever been in the past. It's upto the west now to finally win India over to their side. For that r\they will have to make India as the REPLACEMENT for China. That means whatever investment is leaving China, west should make sure it goes to INDIA, so that people recognise the West's gesture, and India will become pro west. However what they have been doing currently: hoarding Separatist- terrorists, Diverting their Chinese divestments to Vietnam, Phillipines, Mexico and the US itself. So they should not be expecting India to be pro west either...
@@marcialabrahantes3369my country india lost more men fighting ww2 both on the battlegrounds as well starving back home when the monster named Churchill diverted food. We have had it fighting other people's wars.
Most of the so-called "new neutrals" were never aligned with a foreign power, to begin with. They always had an independent stance. India, Brazil, and co. are just too big and complex to have their interests guaranteed by any superpower
Sadly it's become evident that Bloomberg, Reuters, and the AP are propaganda outlets. They were just better at hiding it in the past. Now people have more sources of information (with receipts). .and we're seeing just how twisted these outlets really are.
India has blocked China’s investment and made it more difficult for Chinese companies working in India. But India is not in US block. During COVID India and South Africa went to US block and asked for temporary moratorium on Covid vaccine intellectual property payment to protect world poor, Germany vetoed the proposal. Covid caused havoc, few moths later Europeans came asking India mentioning it is a democracy all the while decrying it , give us support against Russia. It kind of looked very selfish
Switzerland has never been neutral, it has always been Pro-West & Pro-US, just that packaging was done nicely for, Switzerland, so as to present them as neutral.
@@NikitOS-vv4ks when you have an entire alliance which considers you their adversary and a threat, you have no choice but to take a defensive stance. also there's specific. To Ru, "them" are those in alliance AGAISNT Ru, while US definition of "them" are the one who does not agree with US actions/policies.
More people are dying in Palestine every bloody day, and yet, the chief example is the war in Ukraine. This is why you get neutral countries. Love from a neutral country.
You mean: "Has taken Putin his money, and therefore sullied its own reputation for the foreseeable future". If India does not act against what Russia is doing in Ukraine then Pakistan may as well take Kashmir. It would be fair game after all, as India has signaled with this.
Yes, and India has with that raised its shoulders to what Russia is doing in Ukraine. Ironically, it signaled that Pakistan for example could annex Kashmir, that is how dangerous to the regional and world order its position is.
We got bigger problems in our own countries than other people’s wars. Our people need jobs and basic services. Best believe our priority will be our own people
I think they're calling the group the new neutrals, not that each country in it is newly neutral. Some of them are, so the group gets a name to differentiate from 10 years ago
picking sides is what will cause world war iii. world war i and ii were actually european wars, but since europe had colonized the whole world, everyone became involved. the world split in two because europe was split in two. but it is not necessary for that to happen again. if countries follow their own interests, largely then we can end the wars of this century with mostly regional wars (russia/ukraine and israel/gaza) and skirmishes (india/china). but if the us forces everyone into two sides we may just get world war iii
Then how is India not neutral?? India never condemned Russia but it also said Russia directly to stop war, during direct meetings. Moreover unlike Iran or North Korea, India has never send weapons or military to Russia and same in Ukraine, India has even send humanitarian assistance in Ukraine, despite it's relationship with Russia. I don't know, what neutrality is, if not that.
Dear Bloomberg or whoever the editors of this video, when you talk and show India why you always show the most crowded place Delhi or the slums of Dharavi, India is literally much more than that. We are the 5th Largest and fastest economy in the world. India is the only country that eradicated extreme poverty in 2023 as per IMF, yet you guys always present us as the poor. Yes, India still has a long way to go but we are not less than any country. We have several amazing infrastructures, buildings... Every Major companies CEO's are Indians from Google to World Bank and from You tube to Only fans. Please stop showing only the worst part of India in every other video.
Dictatorship lol.. You need to educate yourself. India is the largest democratic country in the world. We ain't china, pakistan or Iran. Read news and reports from IMF.. Don't just google..
Geo-politics is often a losing proposition. The US lost trillions in Afghanistan and Iraq. Still, the US is continuing its decades-long misadventure in the Middle East with regards to Israel, etc.
The US didn't lose trillions. 8 trillion public dollars became private dollars, trickle-down economics continued to not happen, profit and lobbying ensured the system remains successful. Eisenhower warned Americans of this on 1961.
If two groups are fighting and you have nothing to do with any of the group, then what side do you choose? The answer is a simple neither. Bloomberg is making it more complicated than what it is.
Why should countries unnecessarily pick a side and avoid/hate other countries? Countries must always cooperate with each other and not keeping hating each other. Unite and not divide, that should be the motto for the world.😀😃😎
the difficulty in being non aligned or not choosing sides, is when they are sanctioned by bigger countries for dealing with certain parties deemed unfriendly to the bigger countries... thats when maidans, regime change, flower/colour revolutions happen...
Can someone please tell me why, as an american its getting very disgusting, why we dont spend all our money on our healthcare, infrastructure, and let other counties who want war swim or sink, this spending is killing us
Because the last times we tried to demobilize, we got dragged into WW1, WW2, and 9/11. Disengagement just means more space for adversaries to carry out operations against us.
As Indian foreign policy minister said Europe needs to stop acting like the rest of the world's problems aren't theirs and its problems are the world's problems
India has always been non-aligned and was never and still todays, not part of any alliance. During cold wars in the past and and ongoing wars, India faced immense pressure from different countries to pick the side, but India did not buckle and played important role in preventing the world economy going into the recession which could have impacted lot of small and medium countries whose economies were already struggling. India never waged any war on other countries. Companies can invest looking at the historical record.
For longest time modernization meant westernization till Global South countries got United and said enough is enough. Global South will now define what it means to be Global by setting its own standard and index.
Take India for example. There is simply no reason why India shud pick a side. Multi allignment has payed them amazing dividends. Its becoming the Switzerland of Asia ( much bigger, much powerful).
Something in this video need to be corrected. China is officially neutral in the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Some argue it's a pro-Russian leaning neutrality, then so is India. If Bloomberg puts China's in the Pro-Russia blog, India should be in it. Furthermore, numerous surveys in India have already shown that majority of Indians are pro-Russian or Russian-leaning. Dear Bloomberg, please correct your info and stay neutral.
Western Cavemen always complain about Indian people being pro-Russian while never questioning why the US donates billions to strengthen Pakistan's military, which ultimately ends up in the hands of state-sponsored terrorists against India. USSR earned the trust of the Indian people in 1971 when the US and Britain deployed their nukes in the Indian Ocean.
Because there's only one annoying bully forcing others to pick side. Not happening on the other side. Well, we can tell who is panicking and who is losing.
Every analysis from Bloomberg is obviously extremely biased, but it's true there is a group of countries which don't want to get involved in someone else's wars. But the reasons might be quite different from one country to another, always depending on internal and external factors. And these factors may vary from uncertainties related to economy and geopolitics to social, demographic, cultural and historical issues, not disregarding the military condition of each country... It's quite a complex analysis to consider only the external potential investment to choose a neutral position or any kind of alignment.
Being an economist and not explaining the audience why correlation and causation are not at all the same thing at 4:05 just goes to show how much BS y'all are trying to push
@@yehuihe1825Nuclear weapons don't land anywhere, dude. Nuclear weapons only land in areas they're meant to hit. Maybe some radiation may slightly spread to neighbouring countries, but many who were not targets will definitely survive. So, stop lying.
As a Brazilian I feel bad that we don't fully align with the West. It sucks to be friends with authoritarian leaders. We can do business with the Chinese block, but should avoid political alliances.
Watch more of our News Spotlight documentaries: ua-cam.com/play/PLqq4LnWs3olXOhUOv4O6r-9OdWTQN83se.html
Have a coffee on Bloomberg! bit.ly/3Yoh33g
US is an evil empire trying to demonize China which wants a peaceful world for trade and business!!!
What they are wondering is why more Nations aren't pro-war.
Normaly no one pro-war. ut that will come to bite them later on because like in the Asia, There are lot of silent conflict and dispute. We just not dumb as Russia to go to full war
And unlike the Great Powers, they also have more to lose as well.
Aren't they lovers of Freedom and Democracy?
When both sides wanted war. We chose peace. The world doesn't realise how important this stand is.
This video desperately screams “save the economy” to me
India is not a new neutral. It has always been non aligned. Though the U.S. support for Pakistan had occasionally pushed it slightly towards USSR in the past.
Pakistan is a well known vassal state.
Their army ‘owns’ Pakistan.
Nice scam you got there. India joins Quad, a military alliance, and you are saying that they are non aligned? Remember when war first started in the middle east between Israel and the other? India first move is to voice their support for Israel? Non aligned Indeed. How about some honesty?
India now is more pro US than it's ever been in the past. It's upto the west now to finally win India over to their side. For that r\they will have to make India as the REPLACEMENT for China. That means whatever investment is leaving China, west should make sure it goes to INDIA, so that people recognise the West's gesture, and India will become pro west.
However what they have been doing currently: hoarding Separatist- terrorists, Diverting their Chinese divestments to Vietnam, Phillipines, Mexico and the US itself. So they should not be expecting India to be pro west either...
Multi alignment and non alignment are different
Your enemy doesn't have to be my enemy.
thank you! pretty much like any other person with some common sense would think....but aparantly common sense is hard to find these days.
@@kaiserxblueit's not so common
Poland neutral? What a load of bs in this video.
Lol😂 Poland openly say it want to destroy Russia
They mean Poland is not willing to be a hardcore anti-china😂
as far as I know, of all the countries, Poland hates Russia the most (not counting Ukraine)
Have these morons heard Sikorski? Poland is more pro-US than the US itself.
They said, poland is a place where investments happen, not that it's nautral
Americans when they realise not every country act like there european vassals
Us in Britain, we don't follow America into every senseless war that doesn't need to involve us, we swear!
their*
but yes everyone says yes to $$ until it affects them
usually cuz they didn't get hammered in ww1 or ww2
@@crusader3108Give two example 😅
@@marcialabrahantes3369my country india lost more men fighting ww2 both on the battlegrounds as well starving back home when the monster named Churchill diverted food. We have had it fighting other people's wars.
@@crusader3108 lol tony blair
As a brazillian the only thing I can say is: this sh** is not our problem.
They want peace, they are not warmongers backed by corporates...
US neocons' modus operandi is to create fear, conflicts in order to shift $$ to the US MIC and other associates 🤪🤪
Most of the so-called "new neutrals" were never aligned with a foreign power, to begin with. They always had an independent stance. India, Brazil, and co. are just too big and complex to have their interests guaranteed by any superpower
This was more propaganda than news.
Sadly it's become evident that Bloomberg, Reuters, and the AP are propaganda outlets. They were just better at hiding it in the past. Now people have more sources of information (with receipts). .and we're seeing just how twisted these outlets really are.
yes bro its western propoganda
Yes
Their commitment to democracy ends when it comes to others.
@@A-Wesker-5 he is biased mf 😂
India has blocked China’s investment and made it more difficult for Chinese companies working in India. But India is not in US block. During COVID India and South Africa went to US block and asked for temporary moratorium on Covid vaccine intellectual property payment to protect world poor, Germany vetoed the proposal. Covid caused havoc, few moths later Europeans came asking India mentioning it is a democracy all the while decrying it , give us support against Russia. It kind of looked very selfish
When talk about india always show clips from old delhi😂😂😂
Old Delhi and dharavi 😂😂 they want built an image by this about India
I honestly don't even know if these are from the latest clip. I remember seeing old money before demonetization.
Because that is 90% india. I am also indian, but how it help us to have inflated ego showing 10% affluence while rest 90% bring us shame?
@@abcxyz-ss6uy how old Delhi is 90percent india?
And sometimes Chandpole Bazar from Jaipur where all the rickshaws have been replaced by electric ones but they'll still use the old footage.
Not picking sides has served Switzerland well
Shame they gave that up. Again due to NATO pressure and non stop propaganda.
Having everyone around them permanently defanged by the Americans and British helps a lot.
but but how can you compare european neutrality to developing coutries neutrality
Sadly, the days of Swiss neutrality is long gone.
Switzerland has never been neutral, it has always been Pro-West & Pro-US, just that packaging was done nicely for, Switzerland, so as to present them as neutral.
America: Why don’t you choose side? (False)
America: Why don’t you choose to die for me? (Real)
That’s so true😂
India is sovereign country
It should be "why some nations picking sides".
West: We vs them
Global south: We and them.
Russia is West, truly.
@@NikitOS-vv4ksRussia wanted to be west but they are east
@@jerrellholder8382 Russia has "we vs them" mentality, so that's why I said Russia is West.
@@jerrellholder8382 No. Russia wanted to be West, but the West doesnt want Russia. Only option left is Global South.
@@NikitOS-vv4ks when you have an entire alliance which considers you their adversary and a threat, you have no choice but to take a defensive stance.
also there's specific. To Ru, "them" are those in alliance AGAISNT Ru, while US definition of "them" are the one who does not agree with US actions/policies.
And why should they ?
Because of morals. Do you really want your country to do business with war-raging countries?
@@tamikovacs3887 where were the morals when they nuked Japan, Vietnam war, middle east war,
SOUNDS LIKE WORLD SHOULDN'T DO ANY BUSINESS WITH UNITED STATES @@tamikovacs3887
@@shashwataggarwal9274 exactly , where were their morals then? and why ask now?
@@tamikovacs3887 lol governments have morals? cmon.
More people are dying in Palestine every bloody day, and yet, the chief example is the war in Ukraine. This is why you get neutral countries. Love from a neutral country.
Picking side means picking war, be detached, play fair
India has taken a neutral stance which is right
Nobody cares.
You mean: "Has taken Putin his money, and therefore sullied its own reputation for the foreseeable future". If India does not act against what Russia is doing in Ukraine then Pakistan may as well take Kashmir. It would be fair game after all, as India has signaled with this.
@@bababamamama9303 you cared enough to reply.
Yes, and India has with that raised its shoulders to what Russia is doing in Ukraine. Ironically, it signaled that Pakistan for example could annex Kashmir, that is how dangerous to the regional and world order its position is.
Xinjiang2.0 done what?🤡
We got bigger problems in our own countries than other people’s wars. Our people need jobs and basic services. Best believe our priority will be our own people
I suggest you change the title to Why Some Nations Are Picking Sides
touché
true
Because they are smart.
Sounds like propaganda. You'll get better analysis from twitter than bloomberg nowdays
India is not a new neutral. It has always been non-aligned, being at the forefront of Non aligned movement
I think they're calling the group the new neutrals, not that each country in it is newly neutral. Some of them are, so the group gets a name to differentiate from 10 years ago
I see brics start to annoy them, sanction more then. Sounds like solution.
It will not work now
picking sides is what will cause world war iii. world war i and ii were actually european wars, but since europe had colonized the whole world, everyone became involved. the world split in two because europe was split in two.
but it is not necessary for that to happen again. if countries follow their own interests, largely then we can end the wars of this century with mostly regional wars (russia/ukraine and israel/gaza) and skirmishes (india/china).
but if the us forces everyone into two sides we may just get world war iii
Western-Eastern Front war most devastating war compared to WW1 and 2
India is a "new neutral"? Are you completely uneducated? Literally turning Wikipedia articles into videos using AI would be less inaccurate.
not uneducated...agendaed
How is that wrong?
Elaborate? Your generic comment looks like it was written by AI.
@@prashantsingh9426 india is not new to neutrality - asli singh hai ya cheeni shepherd hai tu dost?
Then how is India not neutral?? India never condemned Russia but it also said Russia directly to stop war, during direct meetings. Moreover unlike Iran or North Korea, India has never send weapons or military to Russia and same in Ukraine, India has even send humanitarian assistance in Ukraine, despite it's relationship with Russia.
I don't know, what neutrality is, if not that.
Chat section seems more reliable than this video😂
I invite the USA to pick our side 😂
What's that
@@laloitalia russian
😂
Dear Bloomberg or whoever the editors of this video, when you talk and show India why you always show the most crowded place Delhi or the slums of Dharavi, India is literally much more than that. We are the 5th Largest and fastest economy in the world. India is the only country that eradicated extreme poverty in 2023 as per IMF, yet you guys always present us as the poor. Yes, India still has a long way to go but we are not less than any country. We have several amazing infrastructures, buildings... Every Major companies CEO's are Indians from Google to World Bank and from You tube to Only fans. Please stop showing only the worst part of India in every other video.
1 Billion Indians are currently living in poverty under modi's dictatorship. 800 million people are on govt food assistance programs.
@@anuragchakraborty8766 1 billion mana bujhis?
Porasuna kora ai..
IMF ar reports dakh..
@@joydebroy9339 Boka soda khangeer chele tui 800 million mane bujhis? Eta govt er nijer report ...
Dictatorship lol.. You need to educate yourself. India is the largest democratic country in the world. We ain't china, pakistan or Iran. Read news and reports from IMF.. Don't just google..
@@anuragchakraborty8766from where you are getting this data... Dhruv rathee videos??😂
Geo-politics is often a losing proposition. The US lost trillions in Afghanistan and Iraq. Still, the US is continuing its decades-long misadventure in the Middle East with regards to Israel, etc.
Correction: US taxpayer lost money in Afghanistan, US arms and ammunition companies didn't. The deep state earned lot of money.
nah, they are just fine, since they can just print another couple of trillions dollars without much of inflation.
The US didn't lose trillions. 8 trillion public dollars became private dollars, trickle-down economics continued to not happen, profit and lobbying ensured the system remains successful. Eisenhower warned Americans of this on 1961.
Why would they ever pick sides in a war they aren't involved in?
If two groups are fighting and you have nothing to do with any of the group, then what side do you choose? The answer is a simple neither. Bloomberg is making it more complicated than what it is.
As new generation IIT engineer from INDIA. We were the reason for your growth stories, not anymore 🇮🇳
why does Great 🇺🇸 always force ppl to pick side?
It's a bully
Better planning, less surprises
@@s-qc9nsyeah, but why bully about picking sides
Oh, also building military bases. The more on our side the more our influence and threat grows
They want another World War
Country chose side in cold war 1.0 . Now one world is poor one is rich. Nobody is doing same mistake again.
That's interesting assertion. Nice observation 👍🏻👍🏻
@@SPmis global south (poor/developing/underdeveloped) vs global north (rich/developed/middle income countries) specifically...
western propaganda is a joke
4:33 just western media things. They always show bad side of India. 😂
" INDIA IS ON PEACE AND HUMANITY'S SIDE "
Really😂
@@AhmedElmohamadi-i5tyes, not a warmonger. We support peace.
Wow, it's almost like they don't want unnecessary human conflicts, like war for example
Why should countries unnecessarily pick a side and avoid/hate other countries? Countries must always cooperate with each other and not keeping hating each other. Unite and not divide, that should be the motto for the world.😀😃😎
It’s necessary to settle on a common set of rules. Differences in what these arrangements ought to be sets the stage for conflict.
Are you considering Israel genocidal war on Palestine? Who are those enabling and backing it.
“New neutrals”? I think you mean non-aligned movement? It’s exactly why they formed the bloc. This isn’t new. In fact, it’s almost 100 years old
One of the mistakes that some political analysts make is to think that their enemies should also be our enemies. Nelson Mandela
Only weaponry corporations want you to pick sides. Economics used to be about: openness, globalization, competition, diversification, and so on.
Lol that's what they told you anyway. Russia saw the writing on the wall and backed out of the Bretten Woods Conference in ww2
Why most nations aren't picking side?
fixed the tittle for you.
the difficulty in being non aligned or not choosing sides, is when they are sanctioned by bigger countries for dealing with certain parties deemed unfriendly to the bigger countries...
thats when maidans, regime change, flower/colour revolutions happen...
Can someone please tell me why, as an american its getting very disgusting, why we dont spend all our money on our healthcare, infrastructure, and let other counties who want war swim or sink, this spending is killing us
Because the last times we tried to demobilize, we got dragged into WW1, WW2, and 9/11. Disengagement just means more space for adversaries to carry out operations against us.
@@doujinflip doesn't mean US will always have to in a perpetual war mode or continue spending for wars
Much love to all from Republic of Alaska, Russia.
Some nations are siding with war
Some are siding with development
As Indian foreign policy minister said
Europe needs to stop acting like the rest of the world's problems aren't theirs and its problems are the world's problems
Indian foreign policy minister might not know too much about European politics then
India has always been non-aligned and was never and still todays, not part of any alliance. During cold wars in the past and and ongoing wars, India faced immense pressure from different countries to pick the side, but India did not buckle and played important role in preventing the world economy going into the recession which could have impacted lot of small and medium countries whose economies were already struggling. India never waged any war on other countries. Companies can invest looking at the historical record.
they based this whole video around russia and ukrain vote and not even mentioned palstine vote and us vetoing lol. what a load of propoganda
But israel and Iran does@@A-Wesker-5
Just say, these nations do not want war.
As war funds USA.
say no to Russia and Israel at the same time
For longest time modernization meant westernization till Global South countries got United and said enough is enough. Global South will now define what it means to be Global by setting its own standard and index.
why take sides, just do what's BEST for your country, and have the best of BOTH sides.
America when they realise nit every country is united kingdom 😂
Take India for example. There is simply no reason why India shud pick a side. Multi allignment has payed them amazing dividends. Its becoming the Switzerland of Asia ( much bigger, much powerful).
Simple
Because they don't want to engage in trade war
Its comfortable to have many options
Countries that didn't vote or abstain fell into Russia block.... Speaks volumes about U.S... "you're with us or against us" mentality
USA's: "If you are not with us then you are against us"
Russia: " If you aren't against us, then you are with us"
Something in this video need to be corrected. China is officially neutral in the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Some argue it's a pro-Russian leaning neutrality, then so is India. If Bloomberg puts China's in the Pro-Russia blog, India should be in it. Furthermore, numerous surveys in India have already shown that majority of Indians are pro-Russian or Russian-leaning. Dear Bloomberg, please correct your info and stay neutral.
Western Cavemen always complain about Indian people being pro-Russian while never questioning why the US donates billions to strengthen Pakistan's military, which ultimately ends up in the hands of state-sponsored terrorists against India.
USSR earned the trust of the Indian people in 1971 when the US and Britain deployed their nukes in the Indian Ocean.
Well If Americans keep supporting Anti India elements what is India supposed to do?
That is just silly and ignorant, my Chinese friend.
@@PS-ej2xn That was knowledge for u my friend. U should've said "Thank u. Let's hang out". U r welcome anyways.
I have no enemies. We all have no enemies
@@A-Wesker-5 Muslims
@@ShivaYadav-uu7rl😂😂 Radical muslims will be more correct
cuz these countries are smart and not like a sheep blindly following a hypocritical nation
Because there's only one annoying bully forcing others to pick side. Not happening on the other side.
Well, we can tell who is panicking and who is losing.
Who is losing?
They are doing the right thing. Stay neutral and then try to bargain with both sides. It worked for Switzerland.
Every analysis from Bloomberg is obviously extremely biased, but it's true there is a group of countries which don't want to get involved in someone else's wars. But the reasons might be quite different from one country to another, always depending on internal and external factors. And these factors may vary from uncertainties related to economy and geopolitics to social, demographic, cultural and historical issues, not disregarding the military condition of each country... It's quite a complex analysis to consider only the external potential investment to choose a neutral position or any kind of alignment.
Because we Thai people love to live peacefully❤
Not taking sides IS TAKING SIDES. You’re not fooling anyone with this narrative.
Being an economist and not explaining the audience why correlation and causation are not at all the same thing at 4:05 just goes to show how much BS y'all are trying to push
Countries are seeing India as safe bet because of its non aligned policy.
India is not "Non*Aligned", India is "All-Aligned"
The Best Side is Your own side, do whats the best for the people who voted for you.
Brazil and US? Guys, this video is full of bias.
Why you should decide a side, India is not neutral and it is in it's own side
India has always been a leader in the non aligned bloc
why some countries are not becoming puppets of west
If you're 'neutral', you can be invited next
Western media is not fair👎
Trump needs to win. I want to visit the moon and mars.
You’ll more likely end up in jail as a perceived political opponent to one of his cronies.
@@doujinflip maybe you should try urself first 🙃
As a Canadian, I would've prefered Canada to just stay neutral. For the interest of our economy.
Cold War 2.0 wouldn't be complete without a new Non-Aligned Movement.
could have fooled me .... BRICS conference was everyone ..... except the West. Such a BS map .....
gosh, you say that like it rocket science :O)
i pick the side that pays me more
Gasoline... 🔥🔥😂😂
Some? It's most of the world
Hmm when nukes land it doesn't matter. Everybody burns regardless of whether you picked side or not.
if you didn't pick sides, why would nukes land on you? who's got nukes to waste on neutrals rather than adversaries?? and to what end???
@@TheGrimStoic funny you think once nuclear war starts anyone would actually be spared. All human dies man
@@yehuihe1825Nuclear weapons don't land anywhere, dude. Nuclear weapons only land in areas they're meant to hit. Maybe some radiation may slightly spread to neighbouring countries, but many who were not targets will definitely survive. So, stop lying.
Coz not every nation can give up their sovereignty and self respect and follow orders of Uncle Sam.
As a Brazilian I feel bad that we don't fully align with the West. It sucks to be friends with authoritarian leaders.
We can do business with the Chinese block, but should avoid political alliances.
😅 A propagandized someone
Do you think that the west accept you as a friend?
Your a fool
Indians agree with you. The US is not a reliable partner to us, but China is absolutely horrendous.
Forced unity is so much worse than voluntary life.
Butthurt oozes out of this video.
As far as India is concerned Trudeau and his bunch of clowns r a big turn-off. U can thank him for driving us to the opposite camp .
Why is Malaysia flag in the middle of the vid thumbnail almost like it’s in the middle of rifle crosshairs?
lowkey racist video but ok.
Why should countries picking side if they have one same goal?
The nation will find another market if old friends not believe him again
America being real American!
Why do nations need to pick side 😂