Humans Living Forever: How Science Can Reverse Aging & Achieve Immortality | Future Documentary Ep.3

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 січ 2023
  • If you thought Human Immortality was just a concept in science fiction, this documentary reveals how it will become science fact. For some scientists featured in this program, achieving Immortality is not a question of ‘If’. The real question is ‘When?’.
    One scientist shows how she is making lab-grown organs called ‘ghost hearts’ that not only grow quickly, but that can be accepted in any host’s body without rejection-ending the agony for those waiting for organ transplants. Another biologist is looking at Immortality at the microbiological level. In his lab, he’s identified the ‘longevity gene’ (called SIR2) that can slow the ageing process, and which holds the key that will unlock our ability to better control the rate at which we age. One gerontologist is unearthing the immortal secrets of lobsters, who never stop growing and naturally live up to the astonishing age of 122 years. Inspired by how their bodies regulate cellular division, he’s developing cutting-edge medications that will boost human longevity.
    Incredibly, one pioneer is creating a unique medical cocktail that can even reverse ageing. Medical techniques like these could pave the way to Human Immortality.
    ---
    SUBSCRIBE for more amazing stories, including free FULL documentaries. At Java Films we have an incredible library of award-winning documentaries: from world-leading investigations to true crime and history, we have something for everyone!
    Click the SUBSCRIBE button and make sure to set NOTIFICATIONS to stay updated with all new content!

КОМЕНТАРІ • 109

  • @yubakrarai
    @yubakrarai 8 місяців тому +13

    We need immortality, I want to choose when I die.

  • @bluealbi
    @bluealbi 8 місяців тому +8

    I love immortality

  • @crassusmaximus5879
    @crassusmaximus5879 9 місяців тому +20

    It doesnt matter if we change, we have to gain immortality, at all costs. One lifespan isnt enough. Sience is the only way.

    • @imkeshavgoel
      @imkeshavgoel 7 місяців тому +1

      True

    • @theobserver9131
      @theobserver9131 5 місяців тому

      Because humans are so awesome? No, they live too long already.

    • @theobserver9131
      @theobserver9131 5 місяців тому

      @Edoardo-wf2qh you should probably take a break from the LSD.

    • @theobserver9131
      @theobserver9131 5 місяців тому +1

      " we have to gain immortality, at all costs".... wow. That's the war-chant of cancer cells. Sounds like hell to me.

    • @nabking2268
      @nabking2268 2 місяці тому

      Science won’t help you buddy sorry to say it but it’s reality we won’t ever be immortal we could extend our lifespan tho…

  • @shondmichael1363
    @shondmichael1363 Рік тому +5

    I just realized Carl Sagan is narrating the intro... Technology is amazing.

  • @Julia-ir1yj
    @Julia-ir1yj Рік тому +5

    Incredible! Science 🧬

  • @MikeG-js1jt
    @MikeG-js1jt 7 місяців тому +4

    Were not struggling with overpopulation, were not sharing and being stingy with resources....

  • @kristie7146
    @kristie7146 Рік тому +13

    Maybe the Amish live longer due to growing their own food with no chemicals, working physically hard every day and not using and electronics at all. What a concept.

    • @lemerkin3633
      @lemerkin3633 Рік тому

      It’s confirmed electronics cause aging

    • @patrick-bu3eq
      @patrick-bu3eq 5 місяців тому +1

      Sitting on your arse in combination with loads of processed foods and an environment that is not really really human friendly at all times.

  • @CUMBICA1970
    @CUMBICA1970 Рік тому +15

    Gee... immortality? Reverse ageing? I'm not asking for a million years more. Just a "mere" couple of hundred years and I'm happy. I mean, it's just baffling how things didn't advance in this field at all. It's like the space program: 1969 the moon, 2023 still the moon (or not even that?) Anyway my great-grandfather died in 1984 aged 97 with zero modern medicine (one day he went to sleep and never got up.) No relative still beat his longevity yet but with all these fancy new treatments surely it's gonna be easy-peasy, right? Right?

    • @Alexus095
      @Alexus095 Рік тому

      Wrong. Science is not magical everything-you-can-imagine type of stuff. Actually it IS magic in a way but it sure has limits. Cause real world, unlike cartoon, has limits. Science has made a TREMENDOUS breakthrough in 21st century, including in medical field. Many people live much longer thanks to it. Including the possibility of transplants. But to reverse aging you need to be able basically to transplant the entire body, not just heart or liver etc. In all likelihood it won't ever happen. Everyone who's enjoying life would rather live longer than shorter, but in the end you die anyway, so whether you lived for 80 or 300 years don't really matter. And ofcourse we're only talking about limits of aging. Other than that - nobody is guaranteed to survive even the next minute. As far as space goes - they did land the thing on Mars. None of it is really important though. The only really interesting place in out star system - we're already there )

    • @CUMBICA1970
      @CUMBICA1970 Рік тому +3

      @@Alexus095 You're mistaking AVERAGE lifespan with MAXIMUM lifespan. What they're talking about it's the latter. People on AVERAGE are living longer because of much better nutrition and much faster, cheaper ways to provide food. Not to mention better medicine. But again that's NOT what they're talking about. They're talking about extending the natural lifespan. I'm sorely talking over that. As much as they did amazing advancements in tech everywhere they missed the mark wildly on THAT one. Zero real results. I remember in mid 1980s a geneticist boldly saying on TV around year 2000 the max lifespan will be at least AT LEAST 150 years. You can't argue that he was wildly wrong. But I give him credits to putting an objective timetable and not some elusive "near-future." That even I layman me can.

    • @CUMBICA1970
      @CUMBICA1970 Рік тому

      @@Alexus095 BTW they did put things on Mars in 1976! I'm old enough to remember they were predicting human landing on Mars to be in the mid 1990s. And that was considered pretty conservative.

    • @Alexus095
      @Alexus095 Рік тому

      @@CUMBICA1970 what you mean by 'you can't argue that he was wildly wrong'? Ofcourse he was wildly wrong. Maximum lifespan hasn't increased to 'at least 150 years' by year 2000. I don't think maximum lifespan increased ever by this much, since maybe stone age. Just a matter of good genetics and luck. So he had absolutely no reason to believe it will do so in the next 15 years. He was wrong in the wildest way possible. Basically it's like a stoner (no offence to them) telling you while puffing 'whoa man, you know how 2040 is gonna be like' ) Diploma of geneticist, if he had one, doesn't neccessarily mean a guy is smart. He simply made a wild prediction for no reason, but some took him seriously cause he's a 'geneticist'. Happens all the time.
      Actually by increasing average lifespan scientists DID increase maximum natural lifespan. Maximum natural lifespan depends on factors. How good genetics you have, how good your body is. But even in the best body - there comes a time when something fatally wears off. So by inventing say modern heart transplantation, scientists allowed such human to live longer, thus increasing maximum lifespan. And the same goes for everything else. Once you caught HiV say in your 20s - your maximum lifespan is 15 years. Scientists increased it to 50 years. Quite a result.
      What you're saying is more like you want a fairy tale to come to life. To reverse aging. Like you took a pill and became 30 years younger body-wise. But it's not realistic. So the only reason you're not seeing results is cause you're not having realistic expectations ;)

    • @Alexus095
      @Alexus095 Рік тому

      @@CUMBICA1970 they did put things there, but only recently the one which took pictures. I think putting people on Mars is much harder than putting them on Moon so these predictions were out of mark. Who was making them anyway? Did NASA say they're going to land people on Mars by mid 90s?

  • @dlfabrications
    @dlfabrications Рік тому +1

    TA65 does it work?

  • @Gigcosassuntos-importantes4
    @Gigcosassuntos-importantes4 Рік тому +2

    Parabéns Ciência.sou a favor da cura do envelhecimento e como sou.inscrevi dei o like

  • @multiversalkarma4868
    @multiversalkarma4868 2 місяці тому +2

    For those who claim you can’t fight God, how do you know what God intends. Maybe just maybe he’s perfectly fine with this and when they want you to perish their just throw some lightning at you.

  • @Sharperthanu1
    @Sharperthanu1 4 місяці тому +1

    That's Doris Taylor in Houston Texas.She creates new internal organs from people's stem cells for transplant into humans who need them.She can even create new human hearts from human stem cells for transplant.

  • @Tamilan-endrumtamilan
    @Tamilan-endrumtamilan Місяць тому +1

    If We can live for ever , there is a side effects too, I need immortality I will be searching..

  • @susymay7831
    @susymay7831 Рік тому +4

    Timestamps would help your nice videos! 👍

  • @CAMIDRCS
    @CAMIDRCS 6 місяців тому +1

    The mitochondria are like the 🔋batteries of the cell.

  • @theobserver9131
    @theobserver9131 5 місяців тому +1

    Rich people living forever while children die of starvation and war. Disgusting.

  • @jordanong5114
    @jordanong5114 3 місяці тому

    This video may help for Transformers anti aging. Besides I want me and my family and friends to remain young and alive forever by using the Transformers way!

  • @jimwilliams3333
    @jimwilliams3333 19 днів тому

    I'm 80 okay. Don't eat sweets most of your life as I have done, and you will stay much younger. Today one can take something like Metformin to control glucose in the body and you should use it or Berberine over the counter, my personal view from listening to Dr. David Sinclair of Harvard anti-aging research UA-cam. Of course, there are other things to consider...

  • @tolaisolia8743
    @tolaisolia8743 Рік тому

    I would living living to the point where we can travel through space

  • @ResidentIndia-yr8do
    @ResidentIndia-yr8do 8 місяців тому

    Yes darling come to India, we will research few people who r living 10,000 yrs or more

  • @clarebritton8245
    @clarebritton8245 Місяць тому +1

    God created us to create x

  • @Vireak-bt8pz
    @Vireak-bt8pz Рік тому +6

    Not saying it's impossible but right now we're not even close to that yet.

    • @420inmysystem69
      @420inmysystem69 Рік тому

      By 2050 at a cost low enough for the average person anti aging treatments will make it so every year of a person's life they lived, two months of additional life could be expected from advances in science and medicine. By 2040 celebrities and high income individuals could afford it. However, subsequent decades witnessed a revolution in medicine, with major advances in the use of stem cells, gene therapy, 3D printing of body parts, nanotechnology and other techniques. Ever more sophisticated, powerful, and compact devices gained the ability to scan, identify and treat the most elusive of bodily defects at scales previously thought impossible. Exponential progress, aided by the prevalence of deep learning and other AI techniques, enabled the "longevity escape velocity" to edge closer and closer - first in mice, then later in monkeys, and finally in humans, with 12 months per year of additional lifespan being added. By the mid-2060s, cost reductions are combining with expiration of patents, and further improvements in research, to enable the majority of the world's population to benefit. As with previous revolutions in science, debates have raged over the ethics and implications of an end to aging. However, there is generally strong support from the public, due to the improvements in quality of life (healthspan) and the potential to live a vastly extended life with all the experiences and opportunities that brings. My source www.futuretimeline.net/21stcentury/2060-2069.htm#longevity this website was created by 100s scientists and mathematicians by calculating the exponential growth of technology and moores law, if you look at the claims they made for 2000-2023 95% of them are correct. You can see the charts of the advancements In technology rise in a realistic exponential rate, not too fast not too slow, and there expectations are very realistic because technology is growing exponentially. Computers' speed and power have generally been doubling every one and a half to two years since the 1960s and 70s.

    • @gailnightowl0423
      @gailnightowl0423 Рік тому +2

      It is impossible, no human will ever live forever. God is in control, not humans.

  • @theobserver9131
    @theobserver9131 5 місяців тому +2

    Immortality for the rich. Death for the poor. Yeah, I'm going with the poor. This is the start of a horror movie.

  • @JohnMartim-sy9yf
    @JohnMartim-sy9yf Місяць тому

    Immortality has nothing to do with stopping or reversing aging;
    If science achieved that objective, men would discover that they could not bear to live forever with a miserable human body, even if it was in their 20s!
    Immortality is about infinite pleasure and happiness that are only accessible to a superhuman body!
    Now, science does not and will never have access to the “know-how” that produces such a nature!
    Scientists must have patience!

  • @arttoegemann
    @arttoegemann 7 місяців тому +1

    Immortality can't be proven. 😅😅😅😂
    But go for it.

  • @vondy6563
    @vondy6563 Рік тому +15

    …Blames her older age on her sick partner. Could it be your lifestyle choices?

    • @Really_Roby
      @Really_Roby 7 місяців тому

      And you missed the point 🤦🏽‍♀️

  • @zoeboltak8093
    @zoeboltak8093 8 місяців тому +1

    My father is 90 and moving around pretty well. Why die in 90es.

  • @vicstevensn2684
    @vicstevensn2684 3 місяці тому +1

    It's indefinite lifespans, immortality is impossible.

  • @y.g.1313
    @y.g.1313 7 місяців тому

    junk. well made though.

  • @user-ze3lk1ov5b
    @user-ze3lk1ov5b Рік тому +2

    Fan fact they can't.

  • @theobserver9131
    @theobserver9131 5 місяців тому +1

    I am old and sick and grateful. You'd have to be insane to want to live forever.

  • @sharonbrewer1956
    @sharonbrewer1956 Місяць тому

    Jesus is the only way if you want to live forever

  • @martinavaslovik3433
    @martinavaslovik3433 Рік тому

    Okay, this starts off pretty stupid. I'm sure it gets worse. I'm outa here.

  • @horizon-one
    @horizon-one Рік тому +4

    More fantasy. Creator has given man roughly 120 years. Going against Him doesn't work.

    • @Shiningami_Jem
      @Shiningami_Jem 7 місяців тому

      Well it is obvious that they like to play god (masking it in the name of science and for the sake of humanity). Sorry but we will go back to the grave. Only God can put us at ease and not be scared of death

    • @YDragonGoat
      @YDragonGoat 4 місяці тому

      Nobody can beat the Creator and Nature. If they do they will be destroyed by Creator just like Noah Ark.

  • @gailnightowl0423
    @gailnightowl0423 Рік тому +10

    No human will ever live forever. God is the creator and he didn't make us to live forever.

    • @leikukuifemaledaughter24
      @leikukuifemaledaughter24 Рік тому +3

      😂 it will live forever

    • @gailnightowl0423
      @gailnightowl0423 Рік тому +1

      @@leikukuifemaledaughter24 nope, you're so wrong.

    • @4o7luisclips57
      @4o7luisclips57 10 місяців тому +10

      @@gailnightowl0423 yes we believe in god but we dont want to die you dont understand the fear the people who want to be immortal have of death

    • @Shiningami_Jem
      @Shiningami_Jem 7 місяців тому +1

      A lot of people are scared of death because of the absence of God. Wether you believe it or not, we will go back to the grave. Our bodies will become old and weak, will succumb to diseases and will eventually die. In the face of death, everything becomes meaningless. Even since the beginning of time, no one lived up to 1000 years. And on the later chapters, it will be a blessing if we reached 70 years old. It is written and it shall or already happening

    • @gailnightowl0423
      @gailnightowl0423 7 місяців тому +1

      @@Shiningami_Jem I never said I didn't believe we either went to heaven or hell. We all will be judged on judgement day. I was referring to scientists trying to create a way for us to live forever here on earth.

  • @Author.s_age_reversal
    @Author.s_age_reversal 12 днів тому

  • @universe7250
    @universe7250 Рік тому

    Na

  • @universe7250
    @universe7250 Рік тому

    I dont care🙄

  • @NinjaDildoShow
    @NinjaDildoShow Рік тому +2

    *Like anything good, this will be exclusively available to the wealthy.*

    • @kamranhamidfar1725
      @kamranhamidfar1725 Рік тому +5

      And free for mice.

    • @karidufano6614
      @karidufano6614 Рік тому

      @@kamranhamidfar1725 lol

    • @tolaisolia8743
      @tolaisolia8743 Рік тому

      Our great grand kids will live double our life expectancy so no it won't be lol And if you can live for over a hundred years and not be wealthy or rich you must be doing something wrong 😂😂😂😂

    • @420inmysystem69
      @420inmysystem69 Рік тому +2

      In the 2040s yes only celebs and high income people. but by 2050 Various combinations of treatments are now available that can essentially halt the aging process, at a cost low enough for the average person. This is changing society and culture in profound ways. with major advances in the use of stem cells, gene therapy, 3D printing of body parts, nanotechnology and other techniques. Ever more sophisticated, powerful, and compact devices gained the ability to scan, identify and treat the most elusive of bodily defects at scales previously thought impossible. Exponential progress, aided by the prevalence of deep learning and other AI techniques, enabled the "longevity escape velocity" to edge closer and closer - first in mice, then later in monkeys, and finally in humans, with 12 months per year of additional lifespan being added.
      By the mid-2060s, cost reductions are combining with expiration of patents, and further improvements in research, to enable the majority of the world's population to benefit. As with previous revolutions in science, debates have raged over the ethics and implications of an end to aging. However, there is generally strong support from the public, due to the improvements in quality of life (healthspan) and the potential to live a vastly extended life with all the experiences and opportunities that brings. www.futuretimeline.net/21stcentury/2060-2069.htm#longevity my source, this website is around 90% accurate and made by researchers by using the exponential rate technology is growing. You can see the charts for each claim too showing how the technology will advance

    • @DakshPratap-ik5tp
      @DakshPratap-ik5tp Рік тому

      @@420inmysystem69 so how much younger we will able to make people's untill 2060