Tamron 28-75 F2.8 vs Sony 24-105 F4 📷LENS WARS!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 жов 2024
- Two great all-around lenses.. But which one is the RIGHT choice for YOU?
Tamron (Amazon) ➡ geni.us/fgzpk27 Sony➡ bhpho.to/2yOR0ox ⬇️Full links below ⬇️
10% off unlimited yearly music licensing on Soundstripe (what I use for all my videos) use coupon code "Max" here: soundstripe.com?fpr=maxyuryev
Shot with (Amazon) ➡ geni.us/aIlc6j
Lens ➡ bhpho.to/2pUjKco
Mic (Amazon) ➡ geni.us/rEtpFA1
If you enjoy our content please consider supporting us on Patreon. Even $2 a month helps us make more and better content for you!
/ maxyuryev
Follow Max on Twitter: / maxyuryev
Follow on Instagram: / maxyuryev
Follow on Facebook: / maxyuryevpage
~-~~-~~~-~~-~
PRIVACY POLICY and FULL DISCLOSURE:
°Max Yuryev is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com
°Max Yuryev is a participant in the B&H Photo Video affiliate program that provides an advertising commission if you purchase through our links.
°If you purchase something from our affiliate links will get a small commission with no extra cost to you. This makes it possible for us to make more videos. Thank you!
°We DO NOT collect, store, use, or share any data about you.
~-~~-~~~-~~-~ - Наука та технологія
Tamron 28-75 F2.8 - Amazon (Amazon) ➡ geni.us/fgzpk27 B&H➡ bhpho.to/2KVIdpC Adorama➡ bit.ly/2Kdzz9m
Sony 24-105 F4 - Amazon (Amazon) ➡ geni.us/uZBrBIj B&H➡ bhpho.to/2yOR0ox Adorama➡ bit.ly/2lbH965
10% off unlimited yearly music licensing on Soundstripe (what I use for all my videos) use coupon code "Max" here: soundstripe.grsm.io/e/6lv
If you enjoy our content please consider supporting us on Patreon. Even $2 a month helps us make more and better content for you!
www.patreon.com/MaxYuryev
Follow Max on Twitter: twitter.com/MaxYuryev
Follow on Instagram: instagram.com/MaxYuryev
Follow on Facebook: facebook.com/MaxYuryevPage/
Great reviews as always btw.
Максик, русские субтитры пожалуйста
For Videos uses, are they making noticeable noise when filming as the subject change distance? It does happened to me when I shoot with Sigma 18-35 F1.8... Hope you can have a test! Thank you and great work!
They are both silent :) Yes my 18-35 is also noisy.
Have to compare apple with apple. The price point of these two are quiet significant.
Durability: "I haven't really tested this lens...winner Sony." lol
Sony fan boy lol
He said "I haven't really tested this lens LONG ENOUGH", but yeah, do your propaganda job.
To be fair, as nice as their optics are, Tamron have a reputation for making plastic zoom lenses that fall apart.
Declan Murphy agree
@@declanmurphy1006 tell tjat to my 10 years old a007 24v70 tamron 2.8
*Don't tell tamron that*
*uploads video to youtube*
*Tamron raises prices to $879*
1 minute in and I'm super stressed about the back of those lenses. Where are the caps?!
Dude i stopped watching the video cause he keep touching the exposed bottoms of the lenses 😂😂
Damn it! I was set on the Tammy. Now I’m in doubt again.
Aron J Anderson I just really like shallow dof but I guess the extra reach is really nice to have.
Not much difference as long as you have the room to shoot at 105mm :)
I thought I was sold on the Tamron but the thing that had me in doubt was the yellow tint you get on the tamron. I'm not a big fan of it. The sony lenses seem to give you more natural colors. I think it's even more yellow on cameras before the A7III. Rhe A7III seems to give you a less yellowish tint.
Jonas Hesselmark you & me both!! I have both right now and I’m still undecided which one to return. Lol
@@mjcustodio9563 Which one did you keep?
I am getting the 24-105 simply because of it's versatility. I'm all about run and gun and I think the wide capabilities to 105 compression capabilities will be supremo for my commercial work! :) Weddings, corporate videos, etc.
Thanks Max, always love your videos. I have the 24-105mm for my A7RIII and A7III. Love that lens. Don't really need the Tamron but happy they are making affordable and quality E-Mount lenses. Cheers
Thanks! Competition is great! I really hope they put out a 70-200 or say 80-200 lens (if it will be smaller and lighter). If prices are similar to this one $1000 would be awesome.
I’m getting the Tamron to go with a 16-35 f4, and a 70-200 f4. I think the price is right and for the middle focal length I’m looking for the f2.8 will be nice for lower light situations. I like the macro utility as well and for travel it a decent day trip one and done lens. Nice and light. From what I’ve seen this lens has several weather sealed areas so I think it was built to last.
Max, just want to say thanks to you and your brother for all the helpful videos. Love that you guys are as excited and interested in all this stuff as we all are.
I'm amazed about the F2.8 on a zoom lens for this price. It almost looks like a prime lens, with that bokeh!
The Tamron supports the inbody distortion correction just like any other native lens which is also applied to Video if enabled - I had to enable the correction for the lens in the menu, it wasn't enabled by default.
Further there's an embedded profile in the RAWs that at least Capture One can read and it corrects that automatically. Lightroom on the other hand fails to use the embedded profile but the recent update brought a profile for that lens as well.
So distortion is not an issue on the Tamron just like it isn't on the native lenses (most of them apply the correction).
Please tell me more about this, because for me, the distortion is probably the biggest reason I'm shying away from Tamron.
The Tamron is a great value for the money. The 24-105 F4 looks like a good overall lens but it is 500 more and at F4. I am not too worried about the lens firmware issue because Sony is the second largest share holder in Tamron so I bet Tamron will have good support from Sony regarding lens compatibility.
I had an amazing time in Japan using A7iii equipped with the Sony 24-105mm G lense. Really impressed with the overall quality though wish I had an A7Riii as a backup camera.
I can see a case for owning both of these lenses...the Tamron for indoor and the Sony for when you need that extra reach outdoors
Converted from canon to an a7iii and my lens setup is now: 16-36 2.8, 24-105 4, 70-200 2.8, with the 55 and 85 1.8s for primes. I don’t feel like I’ll ever need to buy another lense with this. The 24-105 stays on the camera 90% of the time.
Just one question.
Why the 16-35 f2.8 and not the f4?
@@abhinavashishaind That's the setup I am aiming for, except for the 55. Right now I own the 85 f1.8, the 24-105 f4, and the 16-35 f2.8. Will eventually add one more which is the 70-200 f2.8. In my opinion, if you mainly do landscape, the f4 will be just fine. I went with the f2.8 for two reasons, one because I would like to do night and astro photography, which the f2.8 comes in handy. Secondly, because the 16-35 f2.8 GM lens is rated as one of the sharpest zoom lens from sony. I use it at my work for large product photography in which details are very important. So far it's been very good! Used the 24-105 before, but it clearly doesnt do it as good as the 16-35 f2.8.
That's my personal experience with these lens. Hope it helps.
I agree with you. This setup is super, you have everything you need!
Which would be the better combo ? -
1- A7iii + 24-105 F4 + 55 1.8
2- A7iii + Tamron 28-75 + 55 1.8
3- A7iii + 55 1.8 + FE 85 1.8 + 28-75 kit lens
Please suggest me the better one
MX Visuals It depends what you do. The 55 1.8 is an amazing lens for portraits and just general shooting. I use the Tamron on my A7iii and it is amazing. I personally need the 2.8 and the Tamron is just so sharp! How ever if you are only getting one of these kits - I would get number 1. Because for those blurry backgrounds you can use the 55. Then the 24-105 will be the lens that can do everything. If you are thinking about getting a telephoto lens is the future, I would get Number 2. And personally I wouldn’t bother with number 3.
I bought A7iii with 24-105+55&85mm 1.8 it works great.
I know this is not in the option but, this...
16-35 f2.8, 24-70 f2.8, 70-200 f2.8. The Triune Lens lol
With the ISO performance of the new Sony FF mirrorless cameras F4 is no longer an issue. The 2.8 is no longer a must, it is now just a bonus. I have the 24-105 ordered.
it is still very relevant if you are shooting moving objects at night but for landscapes with tripod 24-105 is a better choice.
i want to switch to sony, currently fuji xt3 right now. until what iso is still good on sony a7iii? i am also thinking to get 24105 for my first lens
I own both lenses, I like Tamron 28-75 but I love the sony 24-105.
The Tamron should be an almost ideal portrait zoom for an a6500.
Hmm that extra stop still sold me. I bought the Tamron. A f/4.0 is ok for video with it's wee shutter speeds.
Chosen Idea I’m leaning towards the Tamron for the extra stop as well. I shoot a lot of concerts and theatre and having f/2.8 is more crucial to me then the extra reach.
To sum up, Tamron wins on : sharpness, Fstop 2.8, size, weight, price, AF. The sony wins on : (much) bigger range, distorsion, vignetting (the last two can be fixed in pp).
Don't forget the OSS on the sony and more pleasant bokeh for my taste.
Tamron 28-75mm 2.8 did win lense of the year! 🤷🏾♂️
Great comparison! So close to 100k!
giving tamron another 2 weeks to fix their auto focus issue or going with the 24-105. Would love to see some side by side talking heads and gimbal shots to see the difference in that extra stop of light. (not for low light but for shallow depth of field)
Please watch Gary Friedman video ua-cam.com/video/mXsV3UJcwdw/v-deo.html
PeglegMedia Yes, very interested in this lens. Are they still having focus issues? Or should I say they focusing lock ups.
Focus issues have been fixed with firmware update. At least, I can't make mine screw up. Love the Tamron lens!
Yeah..confirmed...
Works perfectly 100% of the time, if turning On while in Stills mode (you can then switch to Video mode after that, if needed).
AF issues 100% of the time, if turning On while in Video mode.
I tested it all-day, throughout the day, different times of the day (a few times in the morning, then afternoon and then evening), for 2 days.
So you're saying always start in stills mode then switch to video mode? But I can't just start in video mode?
Kevema Films ...Exactly :)
Tested it for 4 days now (start in Stills mode first)... works 100% of the time now, every single time :D
Thank you for the reply. One clarification, What happens if I do this: Stills Mode --> Turn Camera On --> Switch Stills Mode to Movie Mode --> Turn Camera Off --> Turn Camera On --> Use in Movie Mode. (and second question, I have presets 1 and 2 set for 4K and 1080p filming respectively, would I still need to switch to stills mode first?), thank you!!
The AF problem will re-occur. Needs to always be in Stills mode first when turning On.
I have a Custom/Preset dial set to Movie mode too. Yes, Stills mode first too.
Hope the new FW gets released soon though, so we don't have to do this.
You're awesome!!
I have the Sony 24-105mm.f.4 and I love it :)
i got 24 -105 and i'm happy with this lens!
Is it too heavy with the a7iii? Can you casually travel with it?
First of all I love Sony’s G & GM lenses! I decided to buy the Tamron after renting the 24-105 f4. Besides the awfully cheap lens hood and cap, it really proved I made the right choice for me anyway. Due to the fact it can focus just 2 ½” (@28mm) and 8 ½” at 75mm’s the background separation/bokeh is similar to an f1.8 - f/2. It has no problem focusing quickly even in low light. Tamron has a winner here and ironically has made Sony money.
Thank you sir! The comparison I have been waiting for. 👍
Tamron won out for me (it`s late 2019 and FWare V3) , the cropping ability of the A7R2 and R3 let alone the new R4 makes the 75mm restriction not an issue and it being F2.8 and prime sharp in the middle / and sharp enough at the edges even wideopen along with the not insubstantial size / weight difference on these tiny bodies made it a no brainer for me , also not having OIS built in makes sample variance far better when buying and none of those random whacked out edges which OIS can cause on Sony OIS lenses .. even at the same price I`d choose the Tamron on R series bodies for all this and of course weight and size, the 24-105 would be perfect handling wise on a Camera of D850 size , I thought it a bit unwieldy on a small mirrorless A7R series ..
For me the Tamron is a winner because its almost half price of sony , well balance on your camera compare with the heavier sony , almost can use as Macro lens , sharper than sony and better low light as f2.8 vs f4 .
No subtitles? How am I supposed to watch it at work then? ;)
With Sound.
Mathis Hasse lmaooo 😂
Just got Tammy Yesterday... so far Love this lens.. Tack Sharp.. i was amazed for the price !! autofocus work very well.. !!! BTW.. using on an A73
This combo will be a best seller of 2018.
Where did you purchase your copy of the 28-75? I’ve had my order in on B&H since May 25th...
Got From Cardinal Camera in P.A. Really nice people.. They had Camera in stock as well.. (which is where I got it from) standard ship was overnight since I'm just a couple of states away. and They had a Sense they sent to another store and got it back for me.. They "Might" have more..
Focus camera always has them in stock randomly. Got mine and cancelled my bh photo order
Have you had any AF issues on the tamron? I’ve heard that there were issues with AF on that lens
24-105 has my vote, build quality, focal length, native, no focus issues, less distortion, I mean what more to ask for. IQ is fantastic! $500 extra is well worth the money, what's another 500 from 699 when you're more than half way there.
What more to ask? The 24-105 to be an F2.8 while staying the same price and size/weight 😊
hi, there's one mistake about the macro feature on the Sony. It DOES have a close-up feature at 105mm
please explain!
Those interested in my upcoming field comparison of the Sony 24-70 F2.8 G Master vs this Tamron 28-75 2.8 lens (really sweet video) I'll be publishing it a bit early on Instagram TV! Go over an follow me there by using this link: instagram.com/maxyuryev/channel
My choice is the 24-105mm f/4 🤤
Ikr
Hola, qué tal se comporta con condiciones de baja luminosidad?
that auto focus glitch in the tamron has been fixed with firmware update
so, @105mm f/4 is comparable to @75mm f2.8. wow. thanks Max! I already have this Sony and was planning to sell to buy this Tamron, luckily I watched this ! thanks again Max!
Aldrin Samson but 2.8 on the wide end...if I have room I'll just go 85 1.8.
RdyPlyOne its ok with me to have F4 on the wide end
Finally.....I was waiting for this.... Super Thank You.
Great comparison review, Max - thank you!
please do a comparison of night photos and videos for both
Man that Tamron is tasty, but I think I'm going to go with the Sony.
The wider 24 means a lot to me as and the more telephoto 105 is really nice.
Will be upgrading soon, just got to sell a few lenses and my old body.
Hopefully the a7iii and 24-105 come back in stock soon.
I bought the tamron and wow its amazing. I was comparing to the g master 24-70 though and at $1400 difference it was a no brainer. Haven’t had focusing issues either. Great review!
did you update the firmware? or used it right away straight from the box
I had no issues straight out the box with Version 1. I did update to the latest firmware and focusing did quicken up. Love this lens
how did you do the update?
Through the body. Download the firmware through tamron and it updates through the body
thanks! appreciate it
You know what's funny, it's that I am a Nikon user (photography hobbyist), and I'm saving up to switch to the Sony mirrorless system because my friend has an A7sII (where he is on crop mode because of an 18-105mm) and I was instantly in love. Anyways, I'm currently saving up for an A6000 (beginner here) and the fabled Sony PZ 18-105mm f4 G. But I just discovered that Sigma actually has a 17-50mm f2.8 lens for Nikon APS-C. Therefore, I watched this comparison to weigh the differences between having a 17-50mm f2.8 (25.5-75mm equiv) versus an 18-105mm f4 (27-157.5mm equiv). So thanks for not changing my mind on switching to the mirrorless system. Lol
Is it still win for Sony after AF fixed on tamron?
Which one should I go with for rap music videos?
I really wished the tamron was a 24 and not 28, big deal breaker for me
if 28 is not wide enough for you, then 24 hardly makes any difference.
What you need is at least 18.
So you recommend the less sharp, more expensive, smaller aperture, longer minimum focus distance, and bigger/heavier lens. Am I missing something?
$ony
It's about versatility, Max is prioritizing begin able to frame the shot how he wants over ISO performance, shallow depth of field, and weight savings. You may have a different opinion. For me, I shoot primes whenever I can, so I only bring out the Zoom when I need big reach or when I need to pack just the one lens. In these cases, the 24-105 is better for me. But if your main lens is your zoom and you shoot normal stuff, the sharper and smaller Tamron might be better.
That is if you can only buy one lens. He also says if you have the telephoto range covered by another lens, the Tamron is then his pick.
Tested both extensively on a A7R II and I have to say the 24-105 is great. Contrast, Colours and Buildquality are superior, bigger Range, stabilized, af/mf-switch, additional button.
It may depend on the copy but except for the center (and only the center) the sony is doing better on my A7R II.
Maybe thats only noticeable at 42MP. I would always recommend the 24-105. The only case is if you know you shoot 80%+ in really low light environment.
If you have the 800 for the Tamron, wait till Christmas and buy the 24-105 after ;)
I have been using the sony 24-105 for 4 months now, and I have to say this is better than any lens I owned before. It stays on my camera 80% of the time. Don't under estimate the OSS . I can get good shots down to 1/15 shutter speed which makes up for the f4.
Sony is a Clear winner in AF for actions and moving subjects in my experience of using both.
Not in my experience, Tammy just as good
Thank you so much. This really helped me to make a decision on these two.
This is an amazing video. I'm moving up from my Fuji X100S to the Sony A7lll and, yes, I have the same question: "Which lens should I buy"? I am still undecided. I just love the light weight and smaller design of the Tamron.
Struggled a bit on what to get, but 24-105 fits my needs. If I need something more specific, I can get a prime lens.
Waiting for FW update still... and my return-window ends July 1st. It will go back for a refund if no FW by then.
Well I wish that Sony would work on decreasing their minimum focus distances! Thats my biggest gripe with the lenses I have for my A6000. I'd probably still go for the 24-105 when I switch to FF just because its basically the perfect focal range for an all-around lens. If the Tamron went to 24, it would be a no-brainer with the price difference.
Dude if Sony makes something like 24 105 2.8 no one will buy thier other lens. Its a marketing thing. Its not that they can't makes such lens.
If you want the 24-105 f/4, search google for random camera shops that may be willing to ship the lens. That's how I got my a7iii with the lens.
Thank you for this excellent comparison. You get to the heart of the matter fast, really appreciate that. Tough call comparing these two for most people. I went for the Sony because 105mm is my favorite focal length. I would be more inclined to the Tamron if I was pairing it with a 70-200mm, shooting an event with two cameras, or if I expected to live more on the wider end of the lens shooting wide open for background blur. And that macro capability of the Tamron is fantastic, tempting. YMMV.
My wife and I both have an A7ii each. So the simplest solution was to get both, the Tamron and the Sony. It's too close to call, between them both. But, for me, the SONY offers more versatility with the wide and telephoto reach, along with OSS. The near-macro capability on the Tamron is insane!
I have the Batis 18, Sony 28, 55 and 85. I need a very good all-round lens for whenever I don't use the primes. That is why I bought the Sony 24-105 yesterday after some consideration. Wider and longer end will serve me better than faster aperture since I figure my primes cover that already.
Mikael Aller shoulda kept the 18 mm and replaced the rest with the 28-75 imho
@@ArteUltra1195 28, 55 and 85 amongst the sharpest and best primes... why should he downgrade..!? Just for comfort and portability..?
I am going to buy my first lens for sony. Looking for a all in one solution for now. Which lens would you suggest? Which has prime like image quality? I am a fashion photographer.
@@tamal0167 Any budget in mind? Or any other requirements?
Loving my 24-105. But looking forward to seeing a review from you on the Tarmron 17-28 f2.8
Hey Max, i know its probably too late to ask since this video is months old, but i'd love to know your opinion on this matter. i just bought my tamron 28-75 3 days ago, but im only now getting am amazing deal on a used 24-105 G. i mostly shoot wedding and at times food, portraits. is it worth to have both lenses?
I just switched from Canon to Sony a7iii and i shoot portrait and wedding and food.
Hopefully he or some one else can answer that question because it is my question also!!
About to finally upgrade from a6000 to a7iii soon so was interested by this video. I did without a 2.8 zoom on apsc so certainly could on full frame. However I already own two full frame lenses, the 85mm f1.8 and the 70-200f4. So I have a lens starting at 70mm so the longer reach of the Sony is not essential to me. Price difference is significant so I'll probably go tamron once I know the issues are resolved.
Someone told Tamron that. They raised the price. Who did it?
Thanks UA-cam reviewers... all of the praise of the Tamron 28-75 have caused the price to go up since this video, lol! So now it's $879 and the Sony 24-105 is $1198
I'm still undecided on this, I'm still undecided even to move to Sony still after seeing the great cameras coming out, specially the A7III, but since it is out of stock everywhere, the waiting has made me start thinking if I should wait for Canon's upcoming cameras for Photokina. I've seen many interesting news about raising up their video features for the coming releases. Yeah I know Canon is lacking on tech for video and all, but when I still compare my pictures from my Sony A6000, Samsung NX500 (Yes Samsung made mirrorless cameras) and Canon 6D, the Canon colors always stand out from the rest.
Try calling up camera shops! They shipped me one last week in two days.
Max i need this Answered! Tamron is now $879, Sony 24-105 is now $1198.. would u spend the extra $319 and get the Sony? Or save and get the Tamron still...
Did you know that certain 24-105 models have a focus shifting issue? I would check out Sony's website if your model is one of the affected model numbers. So that sharpness issue might be due to the recall. Also, I have to disagree with you that the Tamron is sharper from my own experience. Great video though, glad I found it.
Did your copy have bad focus?
its a no brainer...get the sony 24-105. just adjust the ISO if need be.
Focus breathing is horrible on the 24-105mm. I would stay away from rack focusing and more extreme focus pulls with this lens. I guess that is one of the compromises with this lens, which is a bit of a shame.
thatchinaboi is it ok to do manual focus with the fly by wire ?
Oh boy! I have a hard decision to make. I got a 24-70 f4, i rarely use it, its good but mostly using the primes. I got a 35 f2.8, 55, 18, 85 1.8. I also got a canon 17-40, and 135 f2. Want to get that tamron, then I can get rid of 24-70, and 35 f2.8.....and maybe the 85 1.8? What would you do? Shiiiet
Both great lenses, but for me it came down to F/2.8 vs F/4. I shoot indoor sports, and even with the sensor in the a7iii, that one stop difference is still significant. That, plus I needed a wider lens to compliment the 70-200 2.8. For general “all in one” use, I’d have gone with the the Sony 24-105. No AF issues with so far with the Tamron.
is the Sony 24-105mm f4 Silent when youre filming with it? does the sounds it makes bleed into the recording?
It’s silent 👍
Watched all (most) of your wedding videos, those that not on youtube, really enjoyed it, not only as photographer, it is goos watch. Which cameras did you mostly use, GH4/5 or A6300/6500? If you can share.
Pete Buoy thanks! Most of the gimbal shots are with a6300/a6500 and a lot of the vids use NX1’s :)
Hi Max, yes but can you now compare it to the tamron 35-150 2-28 please!! Im thinking of selling three lenses to get this tamron. asap thanks.
Thanks dude. I prefer lens to have oss so no go for tameron. And I still think the pricing is steep so your price suggestion is overkill. Sony gm lens pricing is a joke.
I am sick of hearing about the Sony build quality. and the Tamron focus firmware issue. allot of the first Sony 24/105 lenses had issues. I heard about people returning them many times, one guy said he returned three of them in a row. and I was just looking at a comment on a Sony Facebook group, it said that his 24/70 f2.8 GM witch is just over one year old has the rubber focus ring getting out of shape and coming off, and then two other people joined the post saying it has happened to there 24/70 GM lens. one guy said Sony charged him 200 dollars to fix it even with Sony pro support. and all three people said it happened right after the one year warranty period ended. but my Tamron 24/70 f2.8 VC that is maybe 6 years old has never had any issues. and as far as how these two lenses compare, it really comes down to what is more important to you, is it having the 24/105 focal length. or having f2.8.
but I have to say that the Tamron has lots of advantages. it's over a ( hundred grams lighter ) also (close focuses )
it's ( f2.8 ) and ( it's sharper ) and in the US has a ( 6 year warranty ) while Sony has a one year warranty. and the Tamron is ( 500 dollars less money ) so it makes it hard for me to want an f4 lens with only the advantage of the focal range. but with many disadvantages.
YESSSSS!
Fe 70-200 F2.8 GM, I LOVE This len. and U?
photographerjonathan Not to forget the sony 24/105g has feature buttons on the lens itself. The tamron does not. For some people that may be more important especially if you are in the urban area and need quick settings.
gee that one button is really important, means more than even image quality
photographerjonathan Haha no image quality always comes first But I live in NYC and i am starting car shoots and urban shoots. I got to try one of my friends nikon d850, his lens had the buttons on it and wow what a world of difference. Makes switching from action shot to quick manual/tripod easy, instead of spending time going through settings between each transition. If you ever been to car events or stuff like that you will know you must be extremely fast before you lose the shot you are looking for.
Also from all the reviews the image quality is not drastic between those 2 lenses. They both have good image quality. It all comes down to which one is more “convenient” to you.
Thanks for the review 👍🏽 going with the Sony
Hi. One major point for video use is the OSS. I think your review is focusing to much on photo. I consider to move from Pana G9 to A7 III to get the full frame advantages but I struggle to find good lenses at a fare price. For video use; would you not recommend the 24-105?
Hey Max, put a link with GM lens in the description too :)... I think i will go GM 24-70 with no regrets
International Amazon> geni.us/n9ROu B&H> bhpho.to/2IuTNXY Adorama➡ bit.ly/2IiP7n8 Keep your eyes peeled for new vid with this lens in it!
Razvan D. I wouldn't bother with 2470GM unless you need 2.8 for shutter speeds, but even then on newer bodies ISO is less relevant. The 2470GM isn't that sharp...the 24105 is actually a touch sharper. I owned the 2470GM for over one year so I know . Just sold it...lense wasn't worth 2200. Thankfully made 85 percent of my money back
Hope Sony will make a g lens is 100-300 mm F4
Thats the video i was waiting for. I have the 24-105 and already bought the 17-28. The Sony is my most sharpest lens with my A7RIII and i was thinking about the purchase of the Tamron trio. Now... yes
I have the Sony F4 - not entirely happy, prefer a wider aperture, so now considering the Tamron!
did anyone notice Einstein in 8:06?
btw, please make best lenses video for sony a6400 including Tamron 28-75 and the new Tamron 17-28 please.
Ha ha 😂😂 you made my day.
What do you think of the combination of the Tamron 28-75 plus the Rokinon/Samyang 14mm 2.8 AF for approximately the same money? For video, The 14mm becomes 17mm shooting 4K or 21mm in crop mode. This combo Vs the Sony 24-105? Thanks Max!
I think too much background blur in video just looks funky. It’s great on occasion but it’s waaaay overdone. With that said the clear winner is the f4 cause if I need that extra bokeh I’ll just use a prime.
This is super helpful. I want the Sony !
Hi Max,
Thanks for this channel, it has been extremely helpful to me as a new A7iii owner.
Here is my dilemma and maybe an idea for the 3rd video on this topic:
Trying to own just 2 lenses if possible, thanks to you I have my eye set on the Sony 24-105 G f4, but the F4 part is really scary since I love to shoot at low light events, street and landscapes while I travel.
The options I can think of are:
A .- Tamron 28-75 F2.8 + Tessar 16-35 F4 = $2.2K [Video Friendly]
B .- Tamron 28-75 F2.8 + Sony 24 F1.4 GM = $2.2K [Fastest]
C.- Sony 24-105 G f4 + Laowa 15mm F2 FE Zero-D = $2.2K [Wildcard]
Could we have a Lowlight Showdown between this Tamron and the Sony 24-105 F4?
Hopefully, I can stick to just 2 lenses and cover most scenarios, any tips?
I do have the Laowa and its great but for quick shooting Autofocus is really nice to have. What have you been shooting with in the past, and what ISO's were you shooting at?
I have the kit lens and the Sony 50mm 1.8 . I wanted to learn more before investing heavily. The nifty fifty has slow autofocus and I have missed the shoot in low light. I have left the ISO to the camera and I have no complaints until it goes past 5000, F1.8 at 1/50.
I'm going for Batis 18mm and Tamron 28-75
I ended up getting the Tamron and the 16-35 Z
@@chmirenko enjoy!
I was originally looking at the Sony 24-70 f2.8, but now I'm leaning towards getting both of the lenses in this video for the same price.
I go for The Sony lens. Returned my Tamron.
How come?
I wonder if Tamron truly has the ability to fix the focus issue with firmware. If that was causing the delay where they are stopping distribution to update the firmware before releasing to retailer.
Call your local camera stores!! I had the tamron on order at Adorama for 2 weeks and decided to start looking locally. First place I called had 1 in stock.
BTW, been testing for days and I love it!
Which one is better for gimbal work? Please make video comparing both lenses for gimbal work.
Anoop Ammanath Tamron because it’s lighter
One thing I hate about the Tamron is focus ring placement. WTF Tamron!
They placed it there so you could have the short minimal focusing distance.
I'm so psyched to see third party zooms finally come to the E-Mount. Sony's prices are just too high even compared to first party Canon and Nikon lenses. Tamron & Sigma have come so far in the last 10 years. I wonder who will be the first to bring a 70-200mm f2.8 to the E-Mount.
If i get Sony lens with image stabilization and use it on my A7iii will it improve hand held video quality? Or do you recommend getting a gimbal instead? thanks MAX
I definitely recommend a gimbal for video work, its not just a stabilization tool but a tool for cinematic movement. The GH5 has much better stabilization than the Sony cameras and I did a video comparing the GH5's IBIS vs a Sony on a Gimbal (and the GH5 didn't stand a chance). ua-cam.com/video/ptLggJ-Z65M/v-deo.html With that said, your A7iii body will perform better when using a lens that has stabilization in adition to the IBIS.
Thank you Max for the link and info. Love to watch your videos because you make them so informative and straight to the point. Even though you make it look easy and effortless but Without a doubt, I know you put a lot of work into your videos and it shows. Keep up the great work.
For Videos uses, are they making noticeable noise when filming as the subject change distance? It does happened to me when I shoot with Sigma 18-35 F1.8... Hope you can have a test! Thank you and great work!
I already have the Tamron, but the 75 its sucks some times... thinking about to buy the sony for anything like, travels, family, some jobs... more quick to do things... thanks max
Thanks for helping me choose between these two lenses Max! Your channel has helped me soooo much already. Is it true that turning on the image stabilization on the sony 24-105 or any other lens that has it cancels out the ability to use IBIS on the A7III? I've heard people talking about that. I'm a canon shooter who is jumping ship to sony, but I don't have my A7III yet so I can't test this out for myself.
Great "all-around" lenses more or less covered. However is there 35mm f1.4 or f1.8 for Sony(A7III)? Closest option i see is 55 1.8. Selection in 35/55mm prime department seems to be a bit lackluster.