I found it, the worst laptop ever made.

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 вер 2024
  • Thanks PCBWay.com - Today we're messing around with what is quite possibly the worst 90's laptop ever released - the Brother SuperPowerNote Graphic PN-9000GR. Does this thing have ANY redeeming qualities?
    Yes! Maybe. Let's do weird things with it.
    VIDEO LINKS:
    ----------------------
    🍎 MJD's video: • Brother Super PowerNot...
    🍎 VWestLife's video: • 1996 Brother Super Pow...
    🍎 Serial WiFi Modem: www.tindie.com...
    🍎 TheOldNet: theoldnet.com/
    🍎 Captain's Quarters II BBS: cqbbs.ddns.net/
    ══════════════════════════
    💾 For more vintage Apple stuff, please subscribe: www.youtube.co...
    💾 Support these retro computing shenanigans on Patreon! / actionretro
    ══════════════════════════
    🔧 Tool kit I use: amzn.to/31kquDi
    🔨 The best Mac Cracker! amzn.to/2QiHjIl
    🎙️ My microphone: amzn.to/32NBLgh
    🎥 My camera (good for CRTs): amzn.to/33GpF7K
    ══════════════════════════
    💬 Come talk about old computers on the BitBang Social Mastodon! bitbang.social
    ══════════════════════════
    #GEOS #Laptop #Brother

КОМЕНТАРІ • 665

  • @evilthatiswes
    @evilthatiswes 2 роки тому +254

    This video really brings back memories. I used to work the tech support hotline for these machines (along with the Geobooks) around the turn of the Millennium. In the downtime between calls, we would sometimes experiment with the sample machines that we had on hand. Trying to get games to run was an interesting challenge. It is actually possible to boot the Geobooks directly to DOS and bypass GEOS, although I don't recall the hot keys to do so off the top of my head (That was over 20 years ago now.)
    The trouble with Dos games on the PN-9000/Geobook was that keyboard controller didn't appear to return the standard scan codes. Talking to the keyboard through the BIOS commands worked the same as any normal PC, but any software that tried to bypass the BIOS (most action games) would fail. I did manage to get Wolfenstein 3D to work by modifying the source code (which had been open-sourced by that time) to read keystrokes through the BIOS. That worked well enough for navigating the menus, switching weapons, and opening doors, but not so well for movement. However, you could use a serial mouse to handle running and gunning, so the game was perfectly playable, albeit with only PC speaker sound effects.
    As for who actually bought these "laptops," all I can say for sure is that the folks calling the tech support hotline skewed toward being elderly, and many of them did mistake these machines for regular Windows PCs. That said, the callers might not necessarily be a representative sample of the average PN-9000GR/Geobook owner, as those that knew what the machines were and what they could (or couldn't) do would probably not be making calls to the tech support line as frequently.

    • @ActionRetro
      @ActionRetro  2 роки тому +37

      Wow this is amazing, thank you for sharing!!

    • @evilthatiswes
      @evilthatiswes 2 роки тому +38

      ​@@ActionRetro Oh, and a point of clarification since the way I worded that might be ambiguous. There were three GeoBook models that we supported: PN-9000GR, NB60 and NB80C, of which the PN-9000GR was the lowest-end. The model that I got Wolfenstein to run on was the NB-80C.
      The NB-80C was broadly the same machine as the PN-9000, but it had a larger color display, VGA port, built-in modem and (if I remember correctly) a marginally more capable web browser. I never tested the hacked Wolfenstein on the PN-9000GR specifically, so I can't say with 100% certainty that it would have run on that one.

    • @ActionRetro
      @ActionRetro  2 роки тому +7

      @@evilthatiswes Ah cool! Do you remember anything about the key combos to start the machine in stock GEOS, bypass startup scripts, etc?
      Two buttons, three buttons, F keys?
      Thank you again for sharing!!

    • @therobb5738
      @therobb5738 2 роки тому +1

      @@ActionRetro I'm an old-schooler '89'er, still many questins about how x86 machines ran code so efficiently. How did dailt life go on one of these machines?

    • @evilthatiswes
      @evilthatiswes 2 роки тому +3

      @@ActionRetro I've been racking my brain, trying to remember, but it's been over two decades now since I last saw one of these machines. Seems like booting to DOS might have involved hitting F2 or F3 at the right moment on boot, but I'm not sure.

  • @robertthomas7644
    @robertthomas7644 2 роки тому +120

    I had a workmate who's daughter told him she was doing bad in school because she did not have a computer. He was our Aston Tate database guy and said she would not have anything to do with that old blue screen junk. He did not want his girl to have access to the internet but wanted her to see him trying to help her with school. He did not have any lose cash as he had been marred 3 times. He ask me if I had any suggestions as what he could do. I sold him an 8086 with PC-Dos and GeOS. She was so happy with the interface and the print output that with her first English paper she got her first A. She got so much feed back from classmates about how her papers looked she started making money selling presentations even for her teachers. She went to go on to collage with her entrance request letters done on that machine. This was in the late "90s.

    • @mardus_ee
      @mardus_ee Рік тому +7

      It appears from the video, that the GeoWorks office suite and the GeoWrite word processor were in functionality equivalent to something like Microsoft Works.
      Looks much better and more intuitive than Word for DOS. Apparently, your workmate's daughter mastered the functions of the word processor and became successful with it.

    • @SheepUndefined
      @SheepUndefined 3 місяці тому

      Wholesome.

  • @JohnSmith-xq1pz
    @JohnSmith-xq1pz 2 роки тому +250

    Calling it now, next video: this is the cursed worst laptop ever, lets upgrade the heck out of it.

    • @commentarysheep
      @commentarysheep 2 роки тому +22

      First upgrade: a colour screen.

    • @rmcdudmk212
      @rmcdudmk212 2 роки тому +8

      Tear out it's guts and replace them with a modern multi-core processor SBC after the screen swap 😁

    • @JohnSmith-xq1pz
      @JohnSmith-xq1pz 2 роки тому +13

      @@commentarysheep lol. I'm wondering if a vga port was installed would a VGA output to a CRT work...

    • @floydiandroid
      @floydiandroid 2 роки тому +3

      Laptop RAID

    • @JohnSmith-xq1pz
      @JohnSmith-xq1pz 2 роки тому +7

      @@rmcdudmk212 A none functional one would make an interesting Pi project

  • @vwestlife
    @vwestlife 2 роки тому +170

    It looks like it uses the same motherboard as the GeoBook. That's why it has unused pinouts for features that aren't on this model but are on the GeoBook, such as the VGA monitor output and PCMCIA slot.

    • @ionstorm66
      @ionstorm66 2 роки тому +14

      It's definitry just a cost cut GeoBook. Same SOC with half the ram.

    • @greenaum
      @greenaum 2 роки тому +1

      Shame you can't just add the features, but you'd need to locate and solder in all sorts of chips you probably can't buy retail. Still, might be it uses the old Cirrus Logic chip that was in millions of video cards back then, you maybe lift it out and solder it into the Geobook. Well I couldn't, and it's beyond Ben Heck's usual standard. But there are people out there who hand-solder enormous PLCCs over a blacksmith's forge, laughing in a manly way for the duration. Would be pretty nifty to scrap some old 386 stuff and install it there. Not like they were going to pay for a lot of custom chips. The glue's mostly gonna be in the SOC.
      Well, it's a pipe dream, anyway... Still CGA has it's own charm. For what it is, that might be best to stick with. I doubt if you installed a VGA chip that it'd work with the existing LCD so what's the point? If you want an external monitor just buy a better computer. Similarly what value would a PCMCIA card be with GEOS that won't have any of the drivers? Did the higher-end machines run DOS or Windows 3.1 or something?
      Even the keyboard not working, it's expressing the charm of "PC Comparables" from back in the day. Not-quite PCs, that went tits-up if you tried to bypass the BIOS calls. The famously slow, useless, BIOS calls. Still I'm impressed they included DOS at all, particularly in ROM. Maybe a future range of disk software was an option they kept in mind? In between designing another 30 completely unique and incompatible kinds of jumped-up typewriter.
      If IBM had written a decent BIOS to start with, the PC world might look very different now. All sorts of machines, rather than strict clones down to the last transistor. It'd be versatile, you'd be able to divert all sorts of things. Still, Windows does that now, as long as there's a driver...

    • @eekee6034
      @eekee6034 2 роки тому +3

      @@greenaum Rumor has it IBM was in talks with Atari before they went with Microsoft. Judging by the Atari 800, that would definitely have resulted in a decent BIOS! However, most programmers back then hacked the hardware any way they could, partly for performance but partly just because they could. Clones would still have had to have been the same down to the last transistor.

    • @BMWiE-lz3nu
      @BMWiE-lz3nu 2 роки тому +1

      Wouldn't this just be like a "word processor" rather than a "laptop?" When I look at that I just see a modern version of the typewriter sans printer. Wouldn't a "laptop" need a modem?

  • @RowanBird779
    @RowanBird779 2 роки тому +97

    GEOS turned into GEOWorks, which was a competitor for Windows 3.0
    EDIT: Also, if it has a 386/486, it must run DOOM!

    • @kintustis
      @kintustis 2 роки тому +20

      If it has any kind of processor, it must run doom

    • @techman2471
      @techman2471 2 роки тому +22

      If someone can put DOOM on a pregnacy tester, it WILL run on anything!

    • @johntrevy1
      @johntrevy1 2 роки тому +3

      If it has enough RAM, which this doesn't.

    • @mmllmmll22
      @mmllmmll22 2 роки тому +6

      @@kintustis if it has screen then it will run doom

    • @Leeki85
      @Leeki85 2 роки тому +17

      @@johntrevy1 There's new FastDoom port for old PCs and runs faster than original release, while having additional features, like supporting text mode, CGA, EGA, etc. and it will run on less than 4 MB of RAM. Although it might crash in-game when using original WAD file on less than 4 MB of RAM. However it's possible to run custom maps that use fewer textures.

  • @CommodoreFan64
    @CommodoreFan64 2 роки тому +107

    I remember seeing this being sold at Kmart back in the day, and laughing at them for what they cost at $300, but as a former GEOS user, it is really cool that it does run GEOS Works. I would clean this one up, and keep it original, but if you find another one of these in a bit worse shape, then it might be a cool project to shove a Raspberry Pi 4 8GB with some cooling added on, and a more modern screen in it, and make a retro looking franken laptop.

    • @DarthVader1977
      @DarthVader1977 2 роки тому

      for their* price* of* $300

    • @lasskinn474
      @lasskinn474 2 роки тому +6

      it does have some qualities going for it. such as that you can't play leisure suit larry on it. which would be a feature if you were buying it for a slacker.
      edit: maybe it can run who knows

    • @parastie
      @parastie 2 роки тому +4

      Yes! I remember this as well. Right in the front during the Back-to-School section. Along with Brother typewriters and other things.

    • @TheSulross
      @TheSulross 2 роки тому +7

      bought a Tandy Model 200 with exactly that in mind, but the darn thing is still working just fine and I just don't have sufficient resolve to gut a working computer from 1984

    • @maedero05
      @maedero05 2 роки тому

      Geoworks OS on Pc, little graphical predecessor of windows 3.1 - 95 onwards. Eventually it wasn´t ready for the future as GEOS 2.0 only worked on 386/486 machines, pentium onward installation was imposible unlesss. Breadbox Ensemble ddn´t made it anything better !

  • @rmcdudmk212
    @rmcdudmk212 2 роки тому +49

    This poor Brother machine out here giving Vtec kids computers a run for their money 🤣

    • @awesomeferret
      @awesomeferret 2 роки тому +12

      Not really though, this is significantly more capable than any of the Vtech machines. Grammatically speaking, it would be the Vtech kids laptops giving the Brother "laptops" a run for their money.

    • @Skeeballman64
      @Skeeballman64 4 місяці тому

      @@awesomeferret I'd say it could be on par with something like the VTECH Equalizer (I recommend looking it up if you don't know what it is), but that one only.

  • @awesomeferret
    @awesomeferret 2 роки тому +54

    In many ways this was actually way ahead of its time, with the cost reduced and relatively small motherboard with the SoC. This is basically akin to a Surface RT; not horrible or unusable by any means, but not something that you'd want to use unless you had to.

    • @ActionRetro
      @ActionRetro  2 роки тому +11

      Aha good point

    • @CommodoreFan64
      @CommodoreFan64 2 роки тому +4

      I look at as an overprice, and underpowered netbook of it's time.

    • @andrewsadach3194
      @andrewsadach3194 2 роки тому +5

      @@ActionRetro that MX J9734 chip is a rom chip. It basically acts as your system on a chip, and the CPU is just a CPU.

    • @Zellio2011
      @Zellio2011 2 роки тому +4

      Nah, the Dauphin DTR-1 came out in 1993 and was basically a prototype low power tablet, it even had a touchscreen!
      ua-cam.com/video/DaQR4jk1voQ/v-deo.html
      That's your surface RT, as long as it doesn't burn you in the 5 minutes it works

  • @ScrapKing73
    @ScrapKing73 10 місяців тому +3

    Fun fact: the PC/GEOS operating environment is multitasking, multi-threaded, object oriented, is built upon a foundation of x86 interrupt codes, and can run pretty well even on an 8086 with 640k of RAM. It was a masterful piece of engineering!

    • @michaelshopshire5819
      @michaelshopshire5819 Місяць тому

      It started in Berkeley, CA and an earlier version ran on an Apple IIe. It was advanced when I bought a copy in 1988.

  • @lucetubegplusstillsux2678
    @lucetubegplusstillsux2678 2 роки тому +25

    Only thing I could guess this was for was like a 90s equivalent to a Chromebook, a crappy cheap laptop that can be bought in bulk for businesses and schools on a budget.

    • @tarmaque
      @tarmaque 2 роки тому +7

      You'd be shocked what I get up to on my jailbroke Acer 15" Chromebook. ChromeOS removed and replaced with first Elementary OS, but is now running MX Linux. It's been surprisingly durable, reliable, with good battery life and acceptable performance for everyday use. I wouldn't try to edit video with it (Possible, but painful) and photo-editing isn't its strong suit, but for basic internet, word processing, and media consumption it's absolutely fine. It's got a nice screen, decent internal speakers, and HDMI out. The only physical mod I did was to upgrade the 32Gb internal drive to 250Gb.

    • @hypurban
      @hypurban 2 роки тому

      @@tarmaque Nice cope for regretting buying a chrome book.

    • @tarmaque
      @tarmaque 2 роки тому +8

      @@hypurban Did it on purpose, with this specifically as a plan. Worked out great.

    • @cejannuzi
      @cejannuzi 2 роки тому +1

      But they weren't crappy. You could get a lot of work done on them, esp. as a word processor.

    • @ashisharky
      @ashisharky 6 місяців тому +1

      ​@@hypurbanchromebooks actually work great as lightweight Linux machines.

  • @MariaEngstrom
    @MariaEngstrom 2 роки тому +25

    There is one often overlooked value with a machine like this, it gives no, or at least very limited, possibilities for distractions since gaming on it seems near impossible.
    Also, no risk of crashing hard-drive.

  • @Otokichi786
    @Otokichi786 2 роки тому +7

    In the mid 1980's I worked for a portrait/photo studio. The resident techie left for a communications company and I was officially a computer operator. I had been a "why do I need a computer?" film photographer, so an evening college course, "Introduction to IBM compatible computers" was next. The studio's computer was an 4.77Mhz 8088 IBM XT running MS-DOS 3, had a 20MB HDD and a 512K full length monochrome display card, with the usual IBM monochrome monitor, The printers were wide carriage dot matrix printers that shook the flimsy table as they nosily consumed fanfold paper by the yard. PFS: Pro Write and File programs, which managed client lists and order forms rounded out my command line world.
    All was well until two things happened: A freelance programmer brought pirated versions of XTree and the dBase database programs, which needed color to properly display results. By this time, Computer stores were "everywhere," so I went looking for hardware and software updates. A half length 640K color display card and larger 14 inch color monitor solved one problem, and I bought XTree 4 and dBase to "keep things semi-legal."
    Since I was using a clone 80386SX computer running Windows 3.1, I looked for such a program that would take me beyond the command prompt. PC GeoWorks Ensemble 1.0, then 1.2 turned this "dawn computer" into something anyone could use. I even envied the limited set of scalable fonts while Windows 3.x only had pedestrian system fonts. The arrival of Truetype fonts changed my computer world, and, I eventually set the IBM XT aside and used the 80386SX desktop clone to "do Windows." GeoWorks Ensemble was swept aside, but I fondly remember those days when a GUI came to an IBM XT.;)

  • @GeekmanCA
    @GeekmanCA 2 роки тому +12

    Action Retro is the real-life, technology equivalent of Rick Sanchez's Curse Purge Plus - Sean takes cursed machines and makes them actually do something.

  • @Francois_L_7933
    @Francois_L_7933 2 роки тому +36

    If you count the number of pins on the video-out connector, you can tell if it was intended to run on CGA or VGA. From looking at the board, I think it was a VGA machine. Personally, I'd try and soup-up this thing just to see if it could ever have reached it's full potential.

    • @fixyourautomobile
      @fixyourautomobile 2 роки тому +2

      At minimum a color backlit display upgrade

    • @MistahMatzah
      @MistahMatzah 2 роки тому

      The memory would be a cheap and easy place to start, just double the density of those DRAM chips and it'll probably work. Hard to believe that a 386 couldn't address that much.

    • @Francois_L_7933
      @Francois_L_7933 2 роки тому +1

      @@MistahMatzah It depends mostly on the board design. My 386 had 8mb or ram at the time, so yes, the chip can handle it.
      If there is space in the case, I would install sockets and try out stuff.

    • @jnharton
      @jnharton 2 роки тому

      @@fixyourautomobile Color isn’t necessary, but a better quality monochrome or grayscale panel in a more standard resolution /with a backlight/ would be a serious improvement.

    • @Jordansklar0698
      @Jordansklar0698 Рік тому

      Id sodder some more ram it looked to have 2 empty slots there

  • @chironbramberger
    @chironbramberger 2 роки тому +6

    I think this thing is pretty cool. It's about 2 generations old for 1997, so my guess is that it was cheap. Laptops in 1997 were ridiculously expensive, and this would have been a good value for the time, depending on the price. I mean, those built-in apps would have been comparable to what most people were used to at the time, assuming they didn't have the latest and greatest system and apps, and putting everything on ROM like that would have made it pretty snappy and cheap. Honestly, for what this is, I think it's far better than it needed to be. The word processing machines from this era were often not great, and not really intended to be full laptops, so the fact that it lets you run DOS from ROM and load program from floppy is pretty sweet. The display also looks alright for that era... at that time most laptop screen looked really truly terrible, and this is very readable even via a UA-cam video. I like it! If I see one locally I'll grab it!

  • @fab555trainspottingandmore
    @fab555trainspottingandmore Рік тому +3

    The fact, it isn't really yellowed is astounding

  • @JohnL2112
    @JohnL2112 Рік тому +2

    The Brother logos being duplicate, different fonts, and not aligned, is giving me an aneurism

  • @VernesMisadventures
    @VernesMisadventures 2 роки тому +23

    Cool machine! And it has a 386. . .
    It will theoretically run Linux. I'm looking forward to that video. Great entertainment as always. Thanks.

    • @Underestimated37
      @Underestimated37 2 роки тому +9

      There used to be a Linux distro that ran from a single floppy, I’m sure it still exists and would work perfectly on this

    • @ActionRetro
      @ActionRetro  2 роки тому +7

      Hah, I can't figure out how to get it to boot from floppy

    • @richardpetersen7564
      @richardpetersen7564 2 роки тому

      @@ActionRetro BIOS settings maybe?

    • @Underestimated37
      @Underestimated37 2 роки тому +9

      @@ActionRetro a lot of older dos systems and embedded ones like this one don’t have a bios, (or the bios is so underpowered it’s not configurable except for hardware switches or data written by the primary OS) the dos system runs bare metal on the device and performs the functions of the bios, which is probably why it’s not running true MS-DOS but instead is running a custom version specifically designed for embedded systems. “GEOS” is just a shell sitting on top of this embedded DOS, giving it a GUI.
      some Linux distros for older machines though can be launched from dos, which kickstarts it into its own environment. I’ll do more digging in daylight and see if I can recall the distro I had because it could do that.

    • @xerzy
      @xerzy 2 роки тому +5

      @@ActionRetro tbh MS-DOS is essentially Windows' bootloader, and it can most certainly boot other OSes. Linux distros like Caldera OpenLinux used to give you a program that booted up straight into Linux with no reboot, so I'm confident it can be done even if there's no BIOS menu.

  • @kaitlyn__L
    @kaitlyn__L 2 роки тому +6

    I can just see the executive with his bright idea now… “If that thing [GEOS] could run on a C64, think what it could do on today’s cheap hardware! We’ll make so much money licensing it out!”

  • @alextirrellRI
    @alextirrellRI 2 роки тому +16

    I remember seeing these things marketed and even though I knew they were relatively feature locked they were still kinda interesting. There are a few markets I think they might have been going for. One could be an 'evolution' of their word processor lines for people who might have been adverse to buying a fully fledged computer (at the time I knew many adults that refused to use computers), or maybe towards older kids or teens where a parent would want them to only have a computer for schoolwork. This very much looks like something you'd see as the more fully functional version of those kids laptops that had very limited functionality and even smaller LCD displays.

    • @belstar1128
      @belstar1128 2 роки тому +2

      I think this could have been useful for people with very low income if they had fixed some of the bugs a laptop was still very expensive at this time.

  • @bookofdaveandsteve
    @bookofdaveandsteve 2 роки тому +24

    All laptops were sort of ass for a long time. Very expensive, heavy and poor performance compared to the desktops of the day. Even more so than now.
    There was definitely a market for sub-laptop devices for the word processing crowd, which was the "killer" productivity app for those folks.
    This thing is late to the market, but not by much. Maybe 2 to 3 years? See devices like the Tandy WP2, Amstrad NC200. This device is special in not being 8 bit though! And double points for GEOS. I am always interested in anything that helps hardware to have a longer life than it 'should'. Great vid 👍

    • @hengineer
      @hengineer 2 роки тому +1

      especially considering it was a wysiwyg word processor? I grew up using Wordstar, which was a text based, line command word processor.

    • @bookofdaveandsteve
      @bookofdaveandsteve 2 роки тому

      @@hengineer indeed! My amstrad "notebook" got me through 5 years of secondary school. I think it was WordStar compatible. My family couldn't have afforded a "real" laptop and the weight and battery life wouldn't have been viable back then anyway ☺️

  • @abigguitar
    @abigguitar Рік тому +2

    These Brother "notebooks" (and I use this term loosely) were priced around $300 (or less) at a time when an actual notebook / laptop would cost you probably $2k or more. Brother was attempting to capitalize on the low price of this device for households that didn't have that kind of money to spend, but still wanted to have an on-the-go computer. It's not a great deal considering what you got, but I guess some people could have been lured in by its portability and price tag.

  • @FinalManaTrigger
    @FinalManaTrigger 2 роки тому +3

    That MX chip is a flashable EPROM, and that's actually where GeOS, ROM-DOS, and all of the pack in software are stored.

    • @joshm3484
      @joshm3484 2 роки тому

      Also common in the ECU from cars of the era.

  • @erwinvb70
    @erwinvb70 2 роки тому +10

    It does look like a nice machine to write text on and probably has more battery life than the average Win 95 laptop from the day. Would be very interesting to see if the included Geos applications can be extracted and will work on another machine

  • @CaspianandFriends
    @CaspianandFriends Рік тому +1

    When i saw this video, i was like "oh this has got to be a 1 mil subscribers at LEAST yt channel" but no, only 60k! You have the best content keep on doing your thing!

  • @SonicBoone56
    @SonicBoone56 2 роки тому +4

    I unironically love this thing and think it's pretty cool. For a cheapo laptop, it surely does have a fully fledged OS that isn't Windows.

  • @2crude2crudeofficialband3
    @2crude2crudeofficialband3 10 місяців тому +1

    Those machines weren’t meant as kid’s laptops or anything, they were the beginning of the extinction of typewriters. Some companies, including Brother, started making electronic typewriters in the 1980s. By the 1990s they included simple LCD screens and floppy drives for limited compatibility with DOS/Wintel text files, and the machines were re-classified as “electronic word processors”. Eventually their specs and software started beefing up to the point where they could be used as a (very) low-end PC and still had printers built into the machines. This type of laptop was being sold in places like Walmart in the second half of the 90s, usually for around $125-$200… far less than even the cheapest laptops. By then the built-in printers disappeared in favor of portability and connectivity to standard PC printers.
    So what started off as an electronic typewriter basically evolved into a low-end laptop by the end of the Millenium. For some people who were super broke and in desperate need of a laptop with barebones functionality, these machines were the only solution. Not good per se but better than nothing.

  • @Skarry
    @Skarry 2 роки тому

    Legit, ty for the pcbway ad. I need some specialty boards for a project and this will save me a lot of time and frustration.
    I am also glad to see a company other than the usuals advertising with a channel that doesn't have a million subscribers. More reason for me to support them.

  • @photoniccannon2117
    @photoniccannon2117 2 роки тому +1

    Your intro is pure gold. "But... does it have any redeeming qualities? No!"
    Awesome video as always!

  • @dannyhilarious
    @dannyhilarious 2 роки тому +2

    You found the Reliant Robin among laptops.

  • @greenconscious210
    @greenconscious210 2 роки тому +5

    TheOldNet modem that you previously featured has a firmware update that adds PPP support

  • @BuckeyeStormsProductions
    @BuckeyeStormsProductions 2 роки тому +2

    I think a version of this (or maybe this version itself) was sold in Wal-Mart, and for a long time they prided themselves on selling items, "Made in the USA," and would only deal with companies who, well...you know...until it was found out that most of the stuff they dubbed that was actually, "final assembly in the USA," and sometimes was as simple as it got put into a new package after it hit our shores.

  • @brianoconnell6459
    @brianoconnell6459 2 роки тому +1

    It isn't really a bad laptop, just misunderstood. Brother was making word processors and the laptop above on a budget. Remember back in the 90s, PCs and laptops were ridiculously expensive. A typical Windows or Mac laptop would run you THOUSANDS of dollars, while Brother's word processors and again, said laptop, would run you hundreds. Even trading off features would still make them worthwhile, even if you couldn't run solitaire and minefield.

  • @cmedeir
    @cmedeir 2 роки тому +1

    I worked at Sears and we sold these. They were NOT sold as computers (though they were sold in the computer department) they were sold exclusively as “Word Processors”. College students (on a budget) would buy these instead of laptops because of the price. As I recall, the modems allowed you to connect to the school’s network to submit work, etc. remotely.
    We didn’t sell many at our store, but they were not intended as computers. Like I said, not everyone could afford a laptop - especially a student. I had a friend who wrote a doctoral thesis on one and the ability to save to a floppy that could be read on a regular PC was great.
    Your mocking the product comes from you thinking of it like a computer, which it was not sold as nor intended to replace.

  • @TheSulross
    @TheSulross 2 роки тому +3

    it looks very similar to my Tandy Model 200, which came out in like 1984 or 85, has an Intel 8085, and a suit of applications in ROM which includes Microsoft's Muliplan spread sheet. Comparable functionality at about 11 to 12 years prior to this Brother

    • @cejannuzi
      @cejannuzi 2 роки тому

      Much easier to operate than your Tandy.

  • @donnierussellii4659
    @donnierussellii4659 2 роки тому +2

    These games are probably calling either BIOS or DOS interrupts for keyboard input, but the code is not according to spec or the key codes are different from what the game is expecting, with maybe locale also being a factor.

  • @joshuamacdonald4913
    @joshuamacdonald4913 2 роки тому +3

    If I saw one of these in the 90's I would expect a $99 price tag. I don't remember seeing them ever tho.

  • @crybernetics9007
    @crybernetics9007 4 місяці тому

    I love how brother's product line was apparently laser printers that last for 2 decades and also the worst budget computers ever made.

  • @DarrellLarose
    @DarrellLarose Рік тому +1

    Maybe it should have been called the "Binford 9000" (a nod to the 1990's Tim Allen show "Home Improvement")

  • @yussafmalik7712
    @yussafmalik7712 Рік тому +1

    I remember these they were for word processing in 90's and were meant to be basic and very cheap alternative to full PC. In 90's not every one could afford £1500 PC.

  • @dennisp.2147
    @dennisp.2147 2 роки тому +2

    It would be interesting to pull that version of DOS and GEOS off of thte ROMs and get it running on a standard 386 PC with a slightly better graphics system.

  • @scheitinjebroek
    @scheitinjebroek 2 роки тому +10

    These laptops are what chromebooks are today in my eyes

    • @Lollllllz
      @Lollllllz 2 роки тому +1

      makes me wonder if the pads near the Rom chips are for a harddrive connector like the cheap laptops/chromebooks sometimes ditch when using emmc for storage.

  • @stefannissens282
    @stefannissens282 2 роки тому +2

    When watching this, I couldn't help but remember my grandpa. He was always fond of technology, having spent much od his life in army (radiocommunication, radars and stuff) but in his later days he simply couldn't grasp the idea of computers, especially Windows-based ones. This one would have been a perfect solution for him - he wanted to write his diary, some appointments, and the like.
    It's however interesting that Brother dug the GEOS out from its grave, 10 years after. I was using it in the Commodore environment and it could do much more than that.The productivity apps are actually quite decent. Even more surprising is the coexistence of GEOS with DOS 6.22. Either of these seems like a reduced/custom version that doesn't do any good to the overall compatibility (like custom keymapping that is held nobody knows where, maybe hardcoded in the ROM?) . And yes, with the crappy refresh rate of LCD screens like this one, don't expect it to be any good in any games :)

  • @FreudRulz
    @FreudRulz 2 роки тому +6

    A preliminary look-around suggests that MX J9734 chip may be some sort of reflashable ROM chip. The only information I could find was on an old NES dev forum, but it didn't have the same follow up digits so it may be a different chip altogether.

    • @kbhasi
      @kbhasi 2 роки тому +1

      Yep, I was also thinking it could've been some kind of ROM.

    • @tylisirn
      @tylisirn 2 роки тому +5

      If you searched for 9734 then you just found some other random chip that was manufactured in 34th week of 1997. That's the manufacturing datecode, not the chip type ID. (You can see several other chips on the board with similar 97XX datecodes like 9731 on the CPU, 9721 on the keyboard controller and it matches with the vintage of the BIOS date. Different manufacturers put the codes in different places, so it's not always easy to figure out what number is what on unknown chips, so this is good cross verification.)

    • @FreudRulz
      @FreudRulz 2 роки тому

      @@tylisirn Ahhhh thank you for the clarification

    • @ericpaul4575
      @ericpaul4575 2 роки тому

      I wonder if it is second processor to run GeOS.

  • @OtioseFanatic
    @OtioseFanatic 2 роки тому

    That Top Gear reference, talking about old episodes where they drive crap cars in terrible conditions and getting attached, made me think about the emotional journey that was Oliver.

  • @cmjones01
    @cmjones01 2 роки тому +1

    Interesting device. I remember using GeOS a lot on the Nokia 9000 and 9110 "smartphones" in about the same time period - 1997 or so. They actually had a rather similar hardware spec (386 processor, monochrome screen) but they were pocket-sized and were definitely connected devices, with full internet access, web browsing, email, and integration with the phone.

  • @DmitryEljuseev
    @DmitryEljuseev 2 роки тому +8

    Nice review, thanks for sharing. You can run PPP and a Hayes modem emulator on the Raspberry Pi, this way I connected a Compaq LTE laptop with Windows 95 to the Internet, you only need a Raspberry Pi and a USB-COM for that. I can send a link to the tutorial I did, but links are probably not allowed here. Is there any HDD on this laptop, or only ROM? RAM disk? Investigating such rare systems is actually much more interesting than making 100 times the same retrobright or running Petskii Robots 1001st time, which some popular reviewers do. And this laptop is not the worst, I have a Bondwell laptop with CP/M OS to repair ;)

    • @oasntet
      @oasntet 2 роки тому

      There's also some dedicated serial-to-wifi adapters built around the ESP8266 (or the ESP32). Of course, all of these are more powerful than this 'laptop' and at that point you could just gut this thing and drive it all off the Pi.

  • @spokehedz
    @spokehedz 2 роки тому +1

    This laptop is like if a word processor woke up one day and said "I have had all I can stand, and I can't stands no more!" ate some spinach, and then got as beefy as a word processor could ever get. This is peak word processor performance. You might not like it, etc. etc.

  • @virginiahansen320
    @virginiahansen320 2 роки тому

    Your sponsor should charge YOU money for doing their ad with that monstrosity of a "laptop" in the same frame.

  • @mdrake42
    @mdrake42 2 роки тому +1

    Pretty sure this was aimed at schools and students and is based on PC/GEOS. Was for lower end of the market aiming for people not available to afford the newer computers of the time. Like the Pentium 133 and 166 which were the standard machine types then.
    Edit: I had a 386 laptop with a similar LCD screen. 1. It works best under old school yellow incandescent bulbs.
    2. I needed mouse trails turned on , as it got blurry with fast screen draws. I had same issue as you with it

  • @sarahts21
    @sarahts21 2 роки тому +11

    It IS a typewriter. Bet it'll connect to a Brother printer right out the box.

  • @JohnGMeadows
    @JohnGMeadows 2 роки тому +2

    I remember quite liking Geoworks on my computer back in the day; It was better looking that the Windows of the day, and supported longer file names!

  • @accordinglyryan
    @accordinglyryan 2 роки тому

    I love the little jokes thrown in throughout the newer videos lol

  • @sjgrall
    @sjgrall 2 роки тому

    Your personality makes my day hehehe thanks! I was ironically Googling this thing the other day.

  • @cydragon2.099
    @cydragon2.099 2 роки тому +1

    Man and i thought my netbook running windows XP was bottom of the barrel

  • @livefreeprintguns
    @livefreeprintguns 2 роки тому +1

    Oh wow... a 386SX at 33Mhz! This was literally the specs of my first ever laptop in either 1997 or 1997 and was painfully slow. I want to say I got it at a local used computer store called Grolen here in town for around $100, but it was super painful to use even after installing Linux. Almost still wish I had it because the display on this Brother device reminds me of how bad the display on my laptop was and it makes me wonder if what I actually had was more similar to this device because it definitely wasn't a typical "name brand" piece of hardware.

  • @jon-paulfilkins7820
    @jon-paulfilkins7820 2 роки тому +1

    I remember sitting down and working out how these things work email wise, and writing the support documentation for it, I was working at an BBS turned ISP and we could offer connectivity and email via the BBS. Internet was not really true internet, Pop/SMTP and other mail functions were not an option with these. It was all BBS based where the server end did the hard work. It's a text terminal that could access Pine and Lynx!

  • @daniel_kos
    @daniel_kos 2 роки тому +3

    Great video, though something people forget about Windows 9x PCs in the late 90s was that unless you had a fresh install, Windows itself would "decay", slowing down and crashing more often over the course of a few months. Forgetting to save often enough and losing your document was a common frustration and might explain why niche alternatives popped up from time to time.

  • @livefreeprintguns
    @livefreeprintguns 2 роки тому +1

    It doesn't surprise me at all Catacomb fired right up... there is an amazing two-part video series by Dave's Garage where he breaks down the Fast Inverse Square Root algorithm they used in quake3. The engineers at iD software were literal mad scientist masterminds.

  • @AlexanderRay92
    @AlexanderRay92 2 роки тому

    In middle school in the mid 2000s I used an older version of that to program Python at school. When I got home I'd save the text to a floppy, load it into a desktop and try running the code. Before that I'd print off notes at the library and write programs on note-cards, so it was a definite step up.

  • @GarthBeagle
    @GarthBeagle 2 роки тому +7

    What a cool old machine! the display and the computer itself really remind me of an Apple IIc using it's (horrible) LCD display, seems like very much the same experience 😀
    And I guess if this to be compared to Top Gear, this is your Oliver!

  • @tonyapole408
    @tonyapole408 10 місяців тому

    "I've seen bigger screen in a Calculator.."
    - IBM Thinkpad 1995

  • @benharyo
    @benharyo 2 роки тому +1

    The idea of 386DX-powered board running MS-DOS 6.22 with GeOS as GUI, somewhat intrigues me. Thank you for this excellent video 🙋‍♂

  • @cwaldrip
    @cwaldrip 2 роки тому +1

    This is just one of the reasons I love your channel!

  • @meatballtime
    @meatballtime 6 місяців тому

    My man, I very nearly choked on and spit my coffee all over my living room at that intro. 10/10 😂

  • @WilliamWomack-l8v
    @WilliamWomack-l8v Місяць тому

    I love this video. I owned a copy of GeoWorks Pro in the late 80's. I also had Windows 3.11 and I am sorry to say windows at the time lost out in most ways. The GeoWorks GUI looked great, ran comfortably on a low power 286 with limited RAM had a good suite of apps (Word Processor, Spread sheet "Quattro Pro" a few simple games, a drawing app I loved etc.) The spreadsheed was an addon they shipped with the GUI but it was able to be run in a mode that looked a lot like Geos. Also a little known these days is that Geos GUI was licensed out as the First GUI for AOHell, and AOL shipped with Geoworks Pro. I did not like AOL at first because it was a pain to get local connections with a modem that was faster than 2400 BPS. But the Geoworks Pro was great. Had they been a little more open with the ability for software developers, I feel it would have been a great contender for MS Windows. The drawing app had the ability to rotate text in any direction, very well defined print output even to a nine pin dot matrix printer. Anyway thanx for the video it was a great look back in time.

  • @timmooney7528
    @timmooney7528 2 роки тому +1

    Larger LCD's were made of smaller LCD panels multiplexed together. That aspect ratio was common before people began combining displays.

    • @Δημήτρης-θ7θ
      @Δημήτρης-θ7θ 2 роки тому

      My guess for the weird aspect ratio is that it displays CGA's 640x200 resolution using square pixels. Most CGA-compatible LCD displays doubled the horizontal lines and displayed 640x400 with square pixels instead, so they'll end up with an aspect ratio closer to normal. But that requires a 640x400 display which I guess was expensive.

  • @edgarwalk5637
    @edgarwalk5637 2 роки тому +2

    It was 1/3 ro 1/5th the price of a standard laptop back in the day. Not to mention it had the office apps built in, for no extra cost. Not a total ripoff, but still rather skimpy on the specs.

  • @markjames8664
    @markjames8664 2 роки тому +5

    I wonder if the integrated serial port in the chip was really meant for some POS terminal connections or something like that. If you got the internal modem it probably was faster. But it is really strange that this one shipped with the PPP software but nothing that could use it.

  • @TJDimacali
    @TJDimacali 2 роки тому

    I don't recall anyone calling that interface "Gee-Eeh-Oh-Es." It was always "Gee-yoss."

  • @JoeyRivers
    @JoeyRivers 2 роки тому

    You didn't tell us the weight of the chunky laptop so that I could say he ain't heavy , he's my Brother.

  • @NautilusMortanian
    @NautilusMortanian 5 місяців тому

    To be fair, it would've been considered mobile at the time, and for somebody like my mother, she probably would've preferred the simplicity coming from typewriters. Realistically, this would've provided for her computer demands just fine at the time. In 94, Radio Shack was selling a 386SX PC full-system for $1399, or an 1110 HD "Notebook PC" for $699 with an 8088 CPU with an ever worse LCD than that Brother thing.
    I think they were aiming to make an easy-to-use PDA that could double as a typewriter. Then when you get to the office, you could plug it in to your printer and spit out the paper, which made it real (at the time).
    Also if the scan codes were fixed and they didn't slap that lame geos on it, I could see it being a fun little toy for little me on a road trip, especially if GW BASIC runs on it.

  • @TheMalMeninga
    @TheMalMeninga 2 роки тому +2

    The intros are getting funnier each week!

  • @bluepen61
    @bluepen61 2 роки тому

    I liked your report/video! Redeeming quality: it work!!! Great review!

  • @Stryder_The_Nite_Owl
    @Stryder_The_Nite_Owl 2 роки тому +2

    “Back in the day I used to connect at 1200 baud. But ever since THE MERGER, I can’t even connect at 12 baud!” - Strong Bad / Homestar Runner

  • @Colddirector
    @Colddirector 2 роки тому +1

    Honestly, I wouldn't mind a cheap modern day laptop with a monochrome LCD that booted to a command line. (Whether BASH or CMD) Nobodys gonna make something this niche but i could find use as a distraction free word processor that's easy on the eyes.

  • @GameRetro
    @GameRetro 2 роки тому

    Can I say... I like (nay, love) how you use your hands... there's something about it. When you point at things, or make hand gestures... it's just... SUBLIME.
    Just wanted to express that.

  • @michelleshaw337
    @michelleshaw337 2 роки тому

    A few little bits to add:
    1) These kinds of machines were always aimed at the "appliance user" market. The goal wasn't to be cutting edge, but rather to be a machine that could be used with a minimum of fuss and bother. Think of the Tandy 100 / 200 machines as comparable for their target market.
    2) GeOS was actually quite successful for a long time when you consider its first 8 bit release occurred in 1986. It's easy to mock because it was competing against the behemoths of Microsoft and Apple who were pouring huge $ into developing their GUI products, and GeOS was being produced by a company whose total revenues were the size of a departmental budget inside the other two.
    3) Just for fun, I took a look around, and GeOS is still alive in the open source world - although the project appears to be fairly idle at the moment.

    • @t.gadway6729
      @t.gadway6729 2 роки тому

      Curios thing about GeOS 2 was that it was one of the few OS's written in assembly/assembler. Probably why it could run so well in 2Mb.

  • @eveypea
    @eveypea 2 роки тому

    That is not a "What if?" of history, but more of a "Why, Gawd? Why?"

  • @noiwonttellyoumyname.4385
    @noiwonttellyoumyname.4385 2 роки тому +1

    The thing it's running isn't really GE/OS, and this is borne out by the fact that it's got DOS underpinning it. The PC version of this is just called "Geoworks," and it's more of an operating *environment* than an operating *system*, much like Windows up through 3.11- it just runs on top of DOS. I used this on a couple of my old PC's back in the early 90's.

  • @richardgomes5420
    @richardgomes5420 2 роки тому

    Almost all budget devices had pretty decent keyboards those days whilst today, even high end devices have laughable horrible keyboards.

  • @StevenOBrien
    @StevenOBrien 2 роки тому +1

    Oh, Brother

  • @stevejohnson1321
    @stevejohnson1321 2 роки тому

    I remember Geos made the Commodore64 quite tolerable. I'm also pretty sure, it took three full minutes to boot off the 5.25 disk. What I do miss about those days is the NLQ printers. A good one was less than $200, and an ink ribbon was less than $6, and lasted a long time.

  • @bdnugget
    @bdnugget 2 роки тому

    I absolutely lost it when you said you needed a pee-pee-pee connection LMao

  • @gmcnewlook
    @gmcnewlook 2 роки тому +1

    i almost got one of those for school, but my school thought a "proper" windows machine would be better choice lol, ended with a toshiba satellite

  • @ypoora1
    @ypoora1 2 роки тому

    Looking at the internal construction you can see a spot for a hard drive, math co-pro, more RAM and ROM and probably a VGA controller.
    I bet this exact machine and board have seen use as a full-fat DOS laptop as well as this cut-down version.

  • @lemagreengreen
    @lemagreengreen 2 роки тому +2

    As soon as you showed the serial port my interest was piqued... terminal. Actually looking at its built in functions it doesn't seem that bad, I guess it would have suited some 90s users. At least it could still have some occasional use these days if you can get a decent terminal emulator on there though!

  • @TheDemocrab
    @TheDemocrab 2 роки тому

    When the camera zoomed in on the brother logo, I heard Hulk Hogan in my head

  • @SlowPCGaming1
    @SlowPCGaming1 2 роки тому

    Video & music wasn't a reality for most people back in the dial up days. Gaming never seems to get old. .MP2s, .RM, .WMA, .MOD files would have been the audio formats of choice because highest quality .WAV files were way too big for most of us to attempt too many downloads. It's UI looks clean and thoughtfully organized. Providing the core essentials of what most people use home PCs for. Not much has changed over the decades.
    Brother made a machine that will create custom rubber stamps called the Stamp Creator Pro. It would be cool to see a review and peek inside of how it worked. Also to see if it is still a viable tool for making custom inked stamps for images and text.

  • @damouze
    @damouze 2 роки тому +1

    I used to run GeoWorks Ensemble on my PC back in the early '90s. It worked like a charm. I had a full desktop suite that would work on way lower specs than for instance Windows 3.11 or Windows 95.

  • @XXxerom
    @XXxerom 2 роки тому +1

    You have to solder a VGA port to this machine! Because I really want to see what happens when you do that

    • @knellotron
      @knellotron Рік тому

      The other models, like the NB-60, have the VGA port enabled. It permanently mirrors the main display, nothing too interesting. 16 colors.

  • @frnno967
    @frnno967 2 роки тому

    For the PPP connection, use the Wifi modem by Richard Bettrich called The Old Net. It has a PPP mode where it will emulate a Hayes modem but open a TCP/IP connection and emulate PPP.

  • @bjblack3389
    @bjblack3389 2 роки тому +4

    Back when I sold computers at Incredible Universe in the 90s, we had similar Geoworks-based "word processors" (really a typewriter with a similar embedded PC and an amber-on-black mono VGA CRT). I managed to get Commander Keen running on one using a similar method.

  • @BaronVonQuiply
    @BaronVonQuiply 2 роки тому

    I'm getting flashbacks to Commodore running Geos to pretend it was a modern PC.

  • @ArniesTech
    @ArniesTech 2 роки тому +1

    Damn, I must dig out my old PCs and Laptops 💪😎

  • @SuperTrainStationH
    @SuperTrainStationH 2 роки тому

    The modern equivalent would probably be the King Jim Pomera DM series word processor from Japan, cuts ALL the features of this machine except for the word processor and spreadsheet apps, the interface doesn't even employ a trackpad or any attempt to replicate mouse functionality.

  • @lelandclayton5462
    @lelandclayton5462 2 роки тому

    If this was given to me I would have fun modding it. Convert the LCD to use RGB or composite video output. Compact flash for storage and work out that funky keyboard.

  • @ScrapKing73
    @ScrapKing73 10 місяців тому +1

    The intent of this device was to compete with dedicated word processor machines. Hence the unusual aspect ratio of the screen. So it wasn’t even designed to compete with the far more expensive Win9x laptops of its day. Do I don’t think it was scummy, just a different target audience.

  • @rogerjones8809
    @rogerjones8809 2 роки тому

    The biggest upgrade would be VGA, something very non standard going on with the keyboard, probably proprietary. But trying to sell this in 1997? Please! If it came out it 1988 or so it could compete then. This was obviously made for people that didn’t want the hassle of a regular computer and having all the apps in BIOS is actually a nice feature. Having 2Mb of RAM is surprising but a decent display would have made it MUCH better! Great video on something I’ve never seen!

  • @BMWiE-lz3nu
    @BMWiE-lz3nu 2 роки тому

    I'm pretty sure that's not considered a "laptop" but rather a "digital typewriter"