Forgotten Fronts of WW2: China and Burma 1942-43 (Documentary)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 лип 2024
  • Get Nebula with 40% off annual subscription with my link: go.nebula.tv/realtimehistory
    Watch 16 Days in Berlin: nebula.tv/videos/16-days-in-b...
    Gift Nebula to a friend: gift.nebula.tv/realtimehistory
    During Japan's war against South-East Asia during the Second World War, China was one of the earliest battlefields. The nationalists under Chiang Kai-Shek pleaded to get Allied support against the Japanese. But being part of the alliance would have disastrous consequences for the Chinese.
    » SUPPORT US
    / realtimehistory
    nebula.tv/realtimehistory
    » THANK YOU TO OUR CO-PRODUCERS
    Jim Frame, Erik Ritter, Cardboard, Ken Brownfield, David Garfinkle, Raymond Martin, Konstantin Bredyuk, Lisa Anderson, Brad Durbin, Jeremy K Jones, Murray Godfrey, John Ozment, Stephen Parker, Mavrides, Kristina Colburn, Stefan Jackowski, Cardboard, William Kincade, William Wallace, Daniel L Garza, Chris Daley, Malcolm Swan, Christoph Wolf, Simen Røste, Jim F Barlow, Taylor Allen, Adam Smith, James Giliberto, Albert B. Knapp MD, Tobias Wildenblanck, Richard L Benkin, Marco Kuhnert, Matt Barnes, Ramon Rijkhoek, Jan, Scott Deederly, gsporie, Kekoa, Bruce G. Hearns, Hans Broberg, Fogeltje
    » SOURCES
    Mitter, Rana. China’s War with Japan 1937-1945: The Struggle for Survival. Penguin, 2013.
    Paine, Sarah C. M. The Wars for Asia, 1911-1949. Cambridge University Press, 2012.
    Frank, Richard. Tower of Skulls: A History of the Asia-Pacific War: July 1937 - May 1942. W.W. Norton & Company, 2021.
    Cook, Haruko Taya and Cook Theodore. Japan at War: An Oral History. The New Press, 1992
    USAFFE and Eighth Army. Army Operations in China. December 1941-December 1943. Office of the Chief of Military History, Department of the Army, 1956.
    Tamayama, Kazuo. Tales by Japanese soldiers of the Burma Campaign 1942-1945. Cassell, 2000.
    Tsuneishi, Keiichi. "Unit 731 and the Japanese Imperial Army’s Biological Warfare Program." In Asia-Pacific Journal Japan Focus, November 2005.
    Ministry of Defence of the Republic of China. The immortal Flying Tigers : an oral history of the Chinese-American composite wing. 2009.
    Morton, Louis. “Japanese Policy And Strategy In Mid-War.” In Proceedings of the US Naval Institute February 1959. www.usni.org/magazines/procee...
    Pacific Atrocities Education. “Victims in Zhejiang’s Testimonies.” www.pacificatrocities.org/vic...
    Scott, James. “The Untold Story of the Vengeful Japanese Attack After the Doolittle Raid.” The Smithsonian Magazine, 2015. www.smithsonianmag.com/histor...
    Van de Ven, Hans. "Campaigns in China 1937-1945" in John Ferris and Evan Mawdsley, eds. The Cambridge HIstory of the Second World War, vol I: Fighting the War. Cambridge UP, 2015.
    »CREDITS
    Presented by: Jesse Alexander
    Written by: Jesse Alexander
    Director: Toni Steller
    Editing: Toni Steller
    Motion Design: Toni Steller, Philipp Appelt
    Mixing, Mastering & Sound Design: above-zero.com
    Research by: Jesse Alexander
    Fact checking: Florian Wittig, Mark Newton
    Executive Producer: Florian Wittig
    Channel Design: Simon Buckmaster
    Contains licensed material by getty images, AP and Reuters
    Maps: MapTiler/OpenStreetMap Contributors & GEOlayers3
    Music Library: Epidemic Sound
    All rights reserved - Real Time History GmbH 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 129

  • @realtimehistory
    @realtimehistory  14 днів тому +18

    Get Nebula with 40% off annual subscription with my link: go.nebula.tv/realtimehistory
    Watch 16 Days in Berlin: nebula.tv/videos/16-days-in-berlin-01-prologue-the-beginning-of-the-end
    Gift Nebula to a friend: gift.nebula.tv/realtimehistory

    • @mlin3622
      @mlin3622 12 днів тому +2

      Rip kmt

    • @HistoryHaty
      @HistoryHaty 11 днів тому +2

      I loved Rhineland 45. I also taught my mom a lot about World War II and the Rhine campaign. Thanks jessie.

    • @HistoryHaty
      @HistoryHaty 11 днів тому

      Operation Bagration maybe

  • @kasperherlv5728
    @kasperherlv5728 11 днів тому +184

    Ah yes, Vinegar Joe Stilwell. America’s foremost diplomat. With him on your side, you don’t need an enemy.

    • @kidd32888
      @kidd32888 10 днів тому +11

      He was absolutely terrible and I am no friend Chiang Kai Shek

    • @geoffsokoll-oh1gq
      @geoffsokoll-oh1gq 4 дні тому +1

      Who lost China? The Republicans never would have asked that question if Stilwell was alive. I believe his answer would have been Peanut and his in laws.

  • @Elongated_Muskrat
    @Elongated_Muskrat 11 днів тому +134

    The alliance between the Imperial Japanese Army and the Imperial Japanese Navy was even more dysfunctional.

  • @omkarpatwardhan3070
    @omkarpatwardhan3070 12 днів тому +65

    I am astounded by the quality of these documentaries and the narration based on real, provable research and making a well connected chain of events. I applaud! Thank you!

    • @realtimehistory
      @realtimehistory  12 днів тому +3

      Glad you enjoy it!

    • @soulscanner66
      @soulscanner66 11 днів тому +6

      That's the difference between historians doing UA-cam and UA-camrs doing history.

  • @briantarigan7685
    @briantarigan7685 12 днів тому +116

    Stillwell's used of Nationalist China's best unit in Burma is borderline criminal negligence, he ignores all advice from chinese commanders who straight up told him that even the most modern chinese unit at that time can't be used like american or british forces, their mobility as unit is much more limited and their use as an offensive forces must be accompanied by a substansial numerical superiority due to their lack of material, but stilwell ignores all of these advice and ends up destroying many of China's best units that can be use better in their own homeland
    The way he also basically blackmailed chiang is also pretty disgusting, but it show just how weak china really is at that time for Stilwell to use that low of a tactic.

    • @wuhaninstituteofvirology5226
      @wuhaninstituteofvirology5226 8 днів тому

      Actually, not all KMT best units were in Burma, such as the 74th and the 11th, which were never sent to there, and the 74th was the most decorated KMT unit.

    • @tkling5909
      @tkling5909 5 днів тому +1

      It was a disaster that the US sent this unqualified general to China to further deepen its woes.

    • @tkling5909
      @tkling5909 4 дні тому

      @@aldousroot363 he did worsen the situation. You have to remember China had been fighting alone in this war for four years. All the promises that the US made had not come true, and they ended up with this guy. China needed supplies, not a tough coach.

    • @tkling5909
      @tkling5909 4 дні тому

      @@aldousroot363 And what does the OSS have anything to do with Stilwell's blunders?
      And I'm not sure which "guerrilla"(thats how its spelled by the way, gorilla is an animal) forces you're talking about. Its pretty evident the entire Burma campaign was a disaster. The coordination was almost none existent, but Stilwell was so eager to show off he risked China's best troops for nothing.

    • @tomau0506
      @tomau0506 4 дні тому

      @@tkling5909 China needed a band of tough coaches, but it could never been outsiders...

  • @mensch1066
    @mensch1066 11 днів тому +64

    If anyone reads Jay Taylor's book "The Generalissimo", it becomes clear that in spite of Roosevelt's genuine sympathy for China, the US consistently made things worse for China, either by negligence or by incompetence (in the case of Stilwell).

    • @gsmiro
      @gsmiro 11 днів тому +4

      It is a great book for people who wants to understand Chiang more in depth to read

    • @tkling5909
      @tkling5909 4 дні тому +1

      Its amazing how they even came up with this guy. Picking any random staff officer would have been better.

  • @shatterquartz
    @shatterquartz 12 днів тому +43

    3:55 Western popular perception associates these outfits with Mao and especially the Cultural Revolution, but in fact they were commonly worn for decades before the Communist takeover, and known as Sun Zhongshan suits.

    • @gsmiro
      @gsmiro 11 днів тому +4

      Both Chiang and Mao wears that type of jacket. And most educated men wear that during that era as well. However it has now been strongly associated with Mao.

  • @3komma141592653
    @3komma141592653 11 днів тому +13

    This is the best military history channel on UA-cam by a big margin. Thanks for your high quality content!

  • @golabdurrahman660
    @golabdurrahman660 12 днів тому +24

    can't wait for video about operation Ichi-go

  • @aprince1250
    @aprince1250 11 днів тому +38

    It's a shame that the US denied Chiang's request for troops, aircraft and material. What he was asking for was a fraction of what was being sent to the USSR and may have been able to prevent the eventual communist takeover after the war.

    • @tkling5909
      @tkling5909 4 дні тому

      My thoughts exactly! Why was the US still sending large amounts of equipment to USSR after 1943 was a mystery for me.

  • @oldesertguy9616
    @oldesertguy9616 11 днів тому +13

    Another great video. It has to be maddening to leave out a lot of detail in order to make these videos a manageable/ watchable length.

    • @realtimehistory
      @realtimehistory  11 днів тому +7

      we will probably add a few more things when we release the Supercut of all episodes in one video. but yes, even then it's hard to chose

    • @gagamba9198
      @gagamba9198 10 днів тому

      Omissions are a disservice to history.

    • @oldesertguy9616
      @oldesertguy9616 10 днів тому +2

      @gagamba9198 omissions are necessary, or the researchers could never stop to actually create a video. We are always learning new things, and you can't include everything. They have to decide what is relevant.

  •  9 днів тому +7

    Japanes War against China is am quite astounding on so many levels. The sclae of it. The crualty and how sucessfull the Chinese nationalists ultimatly were inspite of all the difficulties.

    • @jessealexander2695
      @jessealexander2695 7 днів тому +2

      Yes, it's been a fascinating subject to get into.

    • @The_ZeroLine
      @The_ZeroLine 5 днів тому

      They did it to Western enemies much of the time. They had little access to Western women so we don’t know exactly what they would have done if they had.

    • @dabo5078
      @dabo5078 15 годин тому

      @@The_ZeroLine We do know in HK or in Indonesia what they did to Dutch and British

  • @HistoryHaty
    @HistoryHaty 11 днів тому +3

    Love these documentaries. So epic and well edited. Thanks Jessie for covering China’s part in World War II. They are the forgotten ally of World War II and there part in the war against Japan is not talked about.

  • @MikeHunt-fo3ow
    @MikeHunt-fo3ow 12 днів тому +13

    i still cant believe usa let the emperor be free and that nutty doctor

    • @Khaoki
      @Khaoki 11 днів тому +4

      Japan would not have surrendered if the Emperor was on the chopping block.

    • @kaiserchan4683
      @kaiserchan4683 11 днів тому +2

      Japan still has their emperor to this day, but operates as a constitutional monarchy like the Netherlands or England

    • @theotherohlourdespadua1131
      @theotherohlourdespadua1131 11 днів тому

      If keeping the emperor means your occupation troops don't get ganked in the shadows every night or day that's better. Don't forget those occupation soldiers happen to be tax-paying voting Americans who have relations back home who can vote and pay taxes. Every death is a loss of vote for those in power...

    • @flarvin8945
      @flarvin8945 11 днів тому +1

      @@Khaokiyou do know that the Japanese surrendered unconditionally? So "the emperor was on the chopping block," it just the USA felt occupation would be easier with the emperor remaining. Which is mostly true.

    • @MikeHunt-fo3ow
      @MikeHunt-fo3ow 11 днів тому +1

      @@kaiserchan4683 thats what it says on paper anyway

  • @TheASMRHistoryChannel
    @TheASMRHistoryChannel 7 днів тому +2

    Your videos are always amazing! Thank you for posting this

  • @indianajones4321
    @indianajones4321 12 днів тому +9

    Nice doc RTH

  • @oneshotme
    @oneshotme 7 днів тому +1

    I very much enjoyed your video and I gave it a Thumbs Up

  • @bigsarge2085
    @bigsarge2085 11 днів тому +1

    I'm always learning, thank you!

  • @MrDaviyd
    @MrDaviyd 3 дні тому

    super high quality videos, thank you so much

  • @FOADocument
    @FOADocument 10 днів тому +1

    It's interesting to watch historical documentaries on your channel. I hope the channel continues to grow to produce more interesting videos ❤❤❤

  • @alehaim
    @alehaim 11 днів тому +6

    I would love a video on the Chinese civil war and how the communists prevailed over the nationalsits with your detail and production value

    • @realtimehistory
      @realtimehistory  11 днів тому +11

      exactly this is currently scheduled for December

    • @gsmiro
      @gsmiro 11 днів тому +7

      @@realtimehistoryit’s the saddest part of modern Chinese history. A war torn nation came out on the winning side of the war and was about to go on the path of peace and stability, then plunged into darkness and tyranny again. Looking forward to your documentary!

    • @livethefuture2492
      @livethefuture2492 9 днів тому +2

      @@gsmiro
      The best hope for china was back in 1910...perhaps its only hope. when the original republic was founded by Sun yat sen.
      ...after that it was only downhill from there.
      Imagine if the Republic had managed to stabilize itself in those early years. A unified democratic China, with friendly ties to the West and America in particular. How different could the future of East Asia had been if that had been the case.

  • @stanmans
    @stanmans 11 днів тому +3

    It would be honorable to name and recognize all those who participated in the raid and not just J. Doolittle. The raid took great courage for these in the planes knowing what could or would happen to them. I do not recall ever hearing or reading the names of those that participated other than Doolittle. I’ve read about the final destinations of the planes but never the names of those who sacrificed so much to save democracy. I’m not taking away the heroism of J. Doolittle but we should all add the heroism of those who took part

  • @marceldavis5600
    @marceldavis5600 11 днів тому

    Very interesting topic

  • @wicNKWD37
    @wicNKWD37 12 днів тому

    Wonderful!

  • @welcometonebalia
    @welcometonebalia 10 днів тому +1

    Thank you.

  • @mohammedsaysrashid3587
    @mohammedsaysrashid3587 11 днів тому +2

    It was an informative 👍🏻 and great historical coverage episode about Chinese bleak circumstances during 1942,1943 and 1944 ( Japanese invasion, internal catastrophes & allies mismanagements of war efforts in China, Burma ... This magnificent episode revealed some information 👌 that others didn't talk about!however, allot thanks for (RTH) channel for sharing..

  • @theawesomeman9821
    @theawesomeman9821 9 днів тому +1

    Forgot China and the US fought on the same side.
    Now I know why few Chinese and Americans are aware of such history.

  • @skypilot7162
    @skypilot7162 11 днів тому +6

    0:34 Ah, the Doolittle Raid: where our airmen were imprisoned for a year by our great “allies,” the USSR. They HAD to do it because they were super worried about adhering to the laws of neutrality.

    • @applepie4287
      @applepie4287 8 днів тому

      The same USSR that just “happened” to lose track of the airmen letting them escape when transporting them.

  • @gsmiro
    @gsmiro 11 днів тому +5

    Thank you for a very informative and unbiased description of the situation in China during that time period! And the truthful report on Chiang, Mao and Stilwell. The mainstream US history usually sides with Stilwell and portrays Chiang as the evil corrupt dictator and portrays Mao as the peasant reformer that wants the best for China. So thank you for a realistic portrayal of all these characters. And Generallimiso Chiang is still the real hero of China during the darkest days of war against Japan and the Communists.

  • @marceldavis5600
    @marceldavis5600 11 днів тому +2

    Btw can you tell us where u got the map from at 10:35 I think the borders of Tibet are not quite right here. It has a lot of land of Qinghai in it. I couldn't find it in your sources.

  • @micahistory
    @micahistory 10 днів тому +1

    At least the alliance would work out splendidly

  • @alexb.8455
    @alexb.8455 11 днів тому +1

    Coming from Nebula for the Algo

  • @kairutoredo8741
    @kairutoredo8741 11 днів тому +11

    I hope the Chinese never starve again

  • @rkitchen1967
    @rkitchen1967 6 днів тому +2

    Whenever I hear the old trope that the U.S. is the only country to use nuclear weapons, I remind them that Japan is the only country to use modern biological weapons. That's where I usually drop the mic.

    • @The_ZeroLine
      @The_ZeroLine 5 днів тому

      It was a thoroughly nasty war. The US was only in about 7th or 8th place when it came to atrocities committed. The atomic strike is just something easily understood and easily pointed at.

  • @joeyjojojrshabadoo7462
    @joeyjojojrshabadoo7462 12 днів тому +115

    I'm so glad America and China could stay friends to this very day.

    • @Barwasser
      @Barwasser 12 днів тому +93

      If you are talking about the Republic of China (Taiwan), you are right.

    • @aprince1250
      @aprince1250 11 днів тому +23

      Glad someone beat me to the Taiwan reference.

    • @SecNotSureSir
      @SecNotSureSir 11 днів тому +26

      I actually laughed when I read that.

    • @CashSache
      @CashSache 11 днів тому

      Unfortunately, the US couldn't accept the fact that the facists lost.

    • @skypilot7162
      @skypilot7162 11 днів тому +12

      Things might have been different if the Allies had steadily supported Chaing Kai Shek instead of destabilizing him in favor of Mao.

  • @jeremymackevincaylor5041
    @jeremymackevincaylor5041 11 днів тому +1

    Damn bro your English is on point now.thank you

  • @joegordon5117
    @joegordon5117 11 днів тому +2

    Another fascinating piece, sadly rendered incredibly frustrating to watch as Google ran the same ad for Google lens every two minutes throughout the entire video, making it almost unwatchable with so many, frequent ad interruptions

  • @jimmiemacd3603
    @jimmiemacd3603 2 дні тому

    You look like John Travolta from Pelham 123

  • @The_ZeroLine
    @The_ZeroLine 5 днів тому

    It’s also important to remember the Nationalist Army did 95% of the fighting. The PLA only came out of hiding when the war was essentially over to take power + they pillaged & looted their own country side.

  • @merlinwizard1000
    @merlinwizard1000 12 днів тому +1

    4th, 5 July 2024

  • @Mrgunsngear
    @Mrgunsngear 11 днів тому

    🇺🇸

  • @timothy1949
    @timothy1949 11 днів тому +21

    the US allowed all the war criminals of the Japanese 731 units to go free, but, the Japanese had to pass all the details of the experiments they did and the results to the Americans. there is no justice in this world, never, but whoever is the strongest will dictate everything, this is the most important lesson.

    • @aprince1250
      @aprince1250 11 днів тому +10

      The Asian version of Operation Paperclip.

    • @otten5666
      @otten5666 11 днів тому

      Do you really think it would be better to ignore the valuable lessons learned from that information that has saved many lives since then? You're just a kid trying to sound deep using the dead bodies of those Chinese you never met.

    • @vjbd2757
      @vjbd2757 10 днів тому

      It's kinda morbidly funny that China is very mad at Japan for their invasions and atrocities yet far more people died from the Great Leap Forward from China's own doing yet they treat Mao as a hero.

    • @ACF1901
      @ACF1901 9 днів тому

      Or realize your American version of the war has been a huge lie.
      Unit 731 was tasked with fighting diseases, saving lives, not killing people.

    • @applepie4287
      @applepie4287 8 днів тому +4

      If I recall correctly it was more or less agreed upon that the “experiments” the Japanese carried out were more often then not worthless. The main reason for letting them off easy was because the US wanted to change Japan into a puppet state and as such they were inclined to let them off easy.

  • @livethefuture2492
    @livethefuture2492 9 днів тому +2

    Whatever happened during the war, after the war we never should have allowed the communists to takeover completely.
    That mistake would haunt us for the rest of the Cold war, from Korea to vietnam, right until the present day.

  • @deezeed2817
    @deezeed2817 11 днів тому +9

    This is not entirely correct. The Communists were effective because they understood their strengths and weaknesses. They had no airpower, little artillery or tanks and had to deal with Nationalists distrust of arming them.

    • @arifahmedkhan9999
      @arifahmedkhan9999 11 днів тому +4

      Completely false.
      Understanding "strength and weaknesses" doesn't mean anything. They hid until Chang Kai did their best and then they attacked.

    • @gsmiro
      @gsmiro 11 днів тому +3

      If you go back to the source documents, Maos directive was very clear, not to engage the Japanese military. Only carry on a few guerrilla operations, but mainly focus on the development of the Communist Party.

    • @user-ov4jl6hg3x
      @user-ov4jl6hg3x 8 днів тому

      @@arifahmedkhan9999 And so they would rather be the idiot charging into battle completely in the absense of artillery and proper logistics and support, at least nationalists had artillery on the divisional level for most of the first rate armies, the communists could barely arm a division with the proper ammunition. With all due respect, if your line of thought revolves around purely the sense of contribution and with complete disregard and lack of responsibility to the forces you control will lead to the deaths of your men for no reason. Everyone here has goals, and the little interests and intentions they hide, you can't trust everyone, and you have your own goals you need to complete. Being a coward isn't a definition in the book of political manuveuring, if you can't win battles, you retreat and consolidate your forces, but on the other hand if you must, lives and manpower can be sacrificed, it is simply a matter of when and whether or not the benefit outweighs the gain.
      You truly underestimate the communist's situation compared to the nationalists. The CNRA had a continuous influx of ammunition and weapons given the unit was not cut off behind enemy lines and a first rate unit, even so logistics were poor and many units had to source food supplies locally on their own. Communist units, lol, they sourced the weapons and most of it from ambushing and looting Japanese convoys and remote bases.
      For reference, communist soldiers would be lucky to have a rifle, and if they did, they would get 8 bullets if they were lucky, 3 if they weren't per battle. The bulk of the manpower of both sides were mostly conscripts anyways, however nationalist forces evidently held an edge in manpower.
      If the communists did show themselves and fully exposed for a full cooperation the nationalists would have completely sacked them before the Japanese had and a reminder to you, Chiang was forced to cooperate with the communists. If Chiang had the chance the communists would have been vaporized on the spot.
      You are type of person to reprimand and judge a man retreating for retreating 10 steps when you yourself have already taken 50 steps.
      There are a few critical decisions and realizations Mao had to make and that was: in all likelihood the nationalists would not have lost an all out war right away assuming Chiang played his cards right which he did, holding out for years and dragging the Japanese into a stalemate. The second realization is the cohesion of communist units in conventional warfare, horrible, but they lacked an experienced officer corps following the long march in conventional warfare

  • @kirilld6206
    @kirilld6206 10 днів тому

    If you call CPC CCP you can also call democratic and republican party modecratic and pureblican as well xD.

  • @frankschmidt6493
    @frankschmidt6493 11 днів тому +3

    Yet again this shows - even with all the shilling and gaslighting, supposed "bio-weapon" usage included - the eternal anglo is the great menace to the free world.

  • @malvinderkaur541
    @malvinderkaur541 10 днів тому +1

    This is again propaganda against Japan of that time when actually Japan got brutaluzed