Best quote ever! "Obviously AI is going take to all of our jobs the moment product managers can accurately describe what they want. Which means our jobs are effectively safe ad infinitum" 🤣🤣🤣. I totally agree with your sentiment.
Describe what they want is not enough. They should be experts and take responsibility for AI output. Imagine... product manager generate entirely software and they can't even understand a single line of code. That probably cause damage to business for sure. So... at this point, it's so much easier for engineers to take product manager responsibilities. Even entrepreneurs have a risk more than real good engineers, because 1 employee company have a chance to created from experts more than manager.
@@vitalyl1327 RIP Perl 😔 I wish that a moderate to masterfull understanding of C (and maybe C++) was mandatory for all programming jobs. It is scary to see someone writing in Python or JavaScript relatively "well", but will have no idea what is going on at the fundamental level.
I love your content. My current job sucks, but your enthusiasm for software development is literally contagious and woke me up again.I'm motivated to spend some extra time to improve my skills after work
Where programming is concerned, Prime is the proverbial man of the people. Apparently the more definite term is "culture champion." The two pop cultural characters that he tends to remind me of, are Robin Williams' character from Good Morning Vietnam, and Thrall, the Warchief of the Horde. I find that he inspires a similar type of positive emotion, to both of those.
In project LLM wrappers sound terrifying, its bad enough when LLMs are giving me unusable to downright misinformation most of the time. BTW did you make an API for prydwen?
I am so old, that when I started coding, the job was called a “programmer” not “software developer, “flow charts” were demanded as required design step and dominant language on microprocessors was assembly. Every four to five years a new tech, language or methodology was touted as the programmer job killer. Include outsourcing to India as one these magic wands. Not surprising to me, the results never materialized. Some did result in improved efficiency, which was instantly consumed by demand for more features. I enjoyed charging six figures as a consultant to fix the abortions produced by these magic wands in amateur hands. AI is no different.
I'll remember this comment 20 years from now when I decide to charge 6 figures for my consulting and continue to use flowcharts in my designs. Thank you, gigachad 😊
0:25 “when project managers can describe exactly what they want” is the biggest joke of the year. Our PM’s incompetency actually makes the team less efficient.
Thats what i want to do. I finally found something I love doing for work and just in general. I want to learn get better and better and it just feels like all of these tech companies are trying to take it away. It's funny you mentioned anthropic I seen a post today about how amazon partnered with them and dumped a bunch (not shit wish it was) of money into Claude. I just want to get better at my craft and be able to feed my kids with it.
7:54 This is the question to ask when someone tries to sell you a financial market trading system. If they're selling it, it doesn't work. It's that simple.
I used to get people trying to sell me investments that were "guaranteed a huge return". I used to tell them that if they could convince a bank it was guaranteed they wouldn't need to call me. It was whisky & wine at one point, then art. I'm talking long before NFTs.
The more I emplore AI the more I realize I am ultimately asking for LSD aligned provoctions of hallucionation and time twisting rabbit holes to achieve the ultimate goal of FML.
It is morbidly fascinating though, right? Looking at all the symptoms of it flaring up, each day brighter and more frequent. Maybe it was the killing of Harambe adter all...
It's when we stopped replacing lead pipes with much safer materials and just let the lead leech into the water we drink. Your worldview is severely colored if you live in the U.S. because you have to explicitly seek out international media sources to get a broader perspective. I like the DW documentaries channel a lot.
Nah, humanity has always been stupid. It just you can see that more clearly, because you can see that stupidity in the field in which you are highly knowledgeable.
cant really predict the future of programming but 3 things will sure change: 1. the already oversaturated IT job market is gonna get worse 2. junior positions are gonna have staff level requirements 3. orange cats are orange (nothing will be changed about this just found it funny to mention it)
The true value of a programming language like Rust ultimately comes down to whether it solves real-world problems effectively, rather than focusing solely on its target demographic aka the furries.
I assume those aren't actually people, anytime you say anything negative about AI you get a lot of very angry messages that look suspiciously like they were generated by AI.
Wow, that was a bad DSL to begin with. I have built a few to enable executable specifications, so was really disappointed to see their effort, yet quietly comforted.
This honestly feels like an attempt to scam money from VCs from the very beginning. It's got everything a non-tech-literate investor/manager would want, and absolutely nothing any remotely-sane programmer would want.
I agree with this sentiment, with the one caveat that I am sympathetic towards the victims of typical scams. in this case, im not so sure that I feel sorry for the product managers and investors getting scammed, but hey, perhaps im being too harsh
Is not scamming. VCs companies are not stupid, they are just riding the wave. (they know way more than tech companies about how to allocate funds) It is more scamming money from individual investors by just pumping tech stock which otherwise would be sinking due to high interest rates and no actual decent products being launched. Bubbles are very common when central banks manipulate rates, either by lowering or pumping them
@@ThePrimeTimeagen I asked ChatGEPETE GPT: Ah, got it! You're talking about The Primogen, the UA-camr who focuses on software development, particularly around Swift, iOS development, and programming best practices. Thanks for clarifying! 😊 In that case, if you're wondering when The Primogen should try out Swift, I’d say: He already has! 😄 The Primogen is known for diving deep into various programming topics, especially Swift, and sharing his knowledge with a wide audience. He often discusses Swift-related topics and tools that enhance development productivity. But, if you're asking when he should expand or innovate with Swift (perhaps experiment with new features, frameworks, or practices)
0:24 "Obviously AI is going to take all of our jobs the moment that product managers can accurately describe what they want which means our jobs are effective safe at infinitum" So true ! I'd add the client to project manager. Now Imagine someplace where the product manager didn't get the memo. At first, the client is stratified with the first release, it was cheaper, it was on time, so now the client wants more and every department wants their part in the new release with contradicting specification. Because of this, the software is broken where it used to work and the new feature are never quite right. And every time the product manager try to fix something by tweaking de specification, every pieces of code is slightly change and it's broken at 15 different other places. So funny, I'm an oracle now.
This AI stuff is just becoming so exhausting... In my experience using an AI to get something done is more work than just doing myself.... Not only do you need to be able to both review and fix the code it produces, because for most cases these these tools produce nothing but shit, I also have to learn how to prompt these things correctly. I will be spending 1 hour crafting a good enough prompt that gets me what I want, only to then also spend who knows how long ensuring what it produced is actually correct, only to realise that it would've taken you 30 minutes to do it yourself.
it's bad for logic but I like it for busywork like if I've made a thousand lines of new UI code with hardcoded texts I can just feed it into gpt to add localization
There already is a language that's highly optimized for AI, where the code tokenizes into the fewest amount of tokens for business logic, and it's name is Python. You can cram an insane amount of Python code into a relatively small context window.
Sometime AI make me feel dumber. Sometimes AI remembers me they can still invent some magical ffmpeg/libav function that just doesn’t exist. What a joy. At least they are better than stack overflow for weird stuff
I'm a typical CS major , if I'm being brutally honest with myself I can't program to save my life. Well I can a bit ...but there's a lot of work needed..chat assist this young man in his journey of conquest!
So Prime, what language would you recommend for developers (web, javascript) trying to go beyond the web and js framework madness into more of server and infrastructure. Trending new languages like Go or Rust, or Java, python or C++. Thanks
BTW (and dope video) using Claude for json formats prob overkill-- you can just setup Ollama and use any 3-7B model fine-tuned specifically for function-call & you should be able to format the output that Claude gives you w no problem.
When you ask them to produce something novel, a lot of the time LLMs produce placebo code. At first glance it looks like it's on the money, but it's only when you grok it or run it that you realise it's not what you really wanted
I asked Claude and Gemini to program me a simple tornado using only html. Although Claude actually did an ok job for a child. It still got the shape of tornado wrong and used a circle instead of using triangles but hey. It even added in lightning. Deep seek wanted to use css and JavaScript which is more in line with how I’d do it
My view on AI: complexity/intricacy tends to have an exponential relationship to necessary effort and an inverse exponential one to available (also degrading) training material. So even with Moore's law tech progress we might have a max capacity towards which AI is heading in a ansymtotic manner. Don't we have a similar thing somewhere else?
Thank you for this video and for the message transmitted. I love to learn and be good and use AI for very few things but I can’t do things without understanding them. So I definitely prefer to learn how to code and solve problems by myself than using AI
If you have AGI, there would be no point in keeping it for yourself because money would be obsolete, given that you can make anything without paying for it. There would be a point in having it in more hands, because then more things get built. There wouldn't be any point in selling it, since you have no need for money. This is kinda what they've been saying from the beginning and why they put a clause in the contract with microsoft that if they reach AGI, the profit-focused wing of the organization mustn't have any control.
ok but if someone achieves AGI, that person doesn't need to tell people "we achieved AGI", therefore that person gets every commodity in the world (eventually, some would be too expensive initially but "i have superintelligence" so with time "I can do anything"). People are selfish by nature so i dunno if your argument is 100% correct, but yes, in ideal world it could be that we don't need money anymore
@@Neuroszima For starters, I don't think sam altman would be able to own and hide AGI for himself. OpenAI has thousands of people working on this. And it would be a little suspect if OpenAI suddenly close up shop and suddenly altman is commissioning dyson spheres. Also yes, people are selfish, but there are limits. If you have a billion dollars, you aren't losing sleep over whether you'll make another 500 tomorrow. You move up on the heirachy of needs to things that are beyond money, because money means nothing to you anymore. This falls apart entirely when you reach post-scarcity. In a scarce world, it's somewhat of a zero-sum game. Being selfish means you might not care about someone's misfortune because it means you get to take more. But selfishness doesn't get you anywhere in a post-scarce world. You can take all you want and nobody loses anything, and your neighbour can also take all he wants and you don't lose anything. In fact, you both gain if more people are summoning things they want. Someone may end up developing a cure for a rare cancer you didn't even know you had, or creating some kind of entertainment you couldn't have imagined. Society will progress much slower if you're the only one at the helm, and people will want your head if you're keeping the solution to everything for yourself. You gain things with 1 decision and lose things on the other. It's an easy decision for a selfish person.
@@Neuroszima For starters, I don't think sam altman would be able to own and hide AGI for himself. OpenAI has thousands of people working on this. And it would be a little suspect if OpenAI suddenly close up shop and suddenly altman is commissioning dyson spheres. Also yes, people are selfish, but there are limits. If you have a billion dollars, you aren't losing sleep over whether you'll make another 500 tomorrow. You move up on the heirachy of needs to things that are beyond money, because money means nothing to you anymore. This falls apart entirely when you reach post-scarcity. In a scarce world, it's somewhat of a zero-sum game. Being selfish means you might not care about someone's misfortune because it means you get to take more. But selfishness doesn't get you anywhere in a post-scarce world. You can take all you want and nobody loses anything, and your neighbour can also take all he wants and you don't lose anything. In fact, you both gain if more people are summoning things they want. Someone may end up developing a cure for a rare cancer you didn't even know you had, or creating some kind of entertainment you couldn't have imagined. Society will progress much slower if you're the only one at the helm, and people will want your head if you're keeping the solution to everything for yourself. You gain things with 1 decision and lose things on the other. It's an easy decision for a selfish person.
@@Neuroszima For starters, I don't think sam altman would be able to own and hide AGI for himself. OpenAI has thousands of people working on this. And it would be a little suspect if OpenAI suddenly close up shop and suddenly altman is commissioning dyson spheres. Also yes, people are selfish, but there are limits. If you have a billion dollars, you aren't losing sleep over whether you'll make another 500 tomorrow. You move up on the heirachy of needs to things that are beyond money, because money means nothing to you anymore. This falls apart entirely when you reach post-scarcity. In a scarce world, it's somewhat of a zero-sum game. Being selfish means you might not care about someone's misfortune because it means you get to take more. But selfishness doesn't get you anywhere in a post-scarce world. You can take all you want and nobody loses anything, and your neighbour can also take all he wants and you don't lose anything. In fact, you both gain if more people are summoning things they want. Someone may end up developing a cure for a rare cancer you didn't even know you had, or creating some kind of entertainment you couldn't have imagined. Society will progress much slower if you're the only one at the helm, and you obviously have things to fear if you're keeping the solution to all of life's ails for yourself. You gain things with 1 decision and lose things on the other. It's an easy decision for a selfish person.
@@Neuroszima For starters, I don't think sam altman would be able to own and hide AGI for himself. OpenAI has thousands of people working on this. And it would be a little suspect if OpenAI suddenly close up shop and suddenly altman is commissioning dyson spheres.
Funny Bit: It's 4 AM in India here & the effect is being seen on my Master Prime Serious Bit: He is just saying the truth which beginners won't listen & intermediate people would appreciate & Sr people already know so they will open the video for the fun bit. I love watching his videos be it long or short. The name is ❤
Dude as much as I like this kind of format, I think these videos should go on his main channel. I miss seeing his raw reactions and takes on blogs and videos.
3:45 there's nothing wrong with regexes (regrets) to be inside a parser. [Simple] regex is a "regular language" - the one consisting only from terminal symbols. In my opinion it's close to saying that there cannot be infinitely recurring patterns (one structure xan hold another structure thwt can hold first structure). Since numbers don't need complex structures to be parsed properly, only optional inclusion of "+"/"-"/etc. with some repetition of digits is sufficient to be handle them. Therefore, there are no terminals inside number-subparser and it can be implemented via a regex. Not much of a knowledge I have, just generating some words based off Niklaus Wirth's "Compiler Construction" book.
Seems like 1st time it made a code that checks if all inputs are in el with some precision. Reasonable first guess without any verbal explanation, however, how come the code it made didn't even pass the second to last test? Don't they even run the tests to see if code works? Seems like this might have been figured out eventually if the results were fed back with the new algo of chatgpt but it sucks anyways. You'd spent more time making the test cases and checking it made the right thing this time than you'd spend writing a simple function yourself and only making tests for edge cases, and it'd take way less electricity.
I have been letting ChatGPT write all the custom nodes for ComfyUI in python for the past half year. Most of the time I only have to copy the error once or twice before it works.
not defending the ai's, but it might've been better if you had fixed dictionaries, because then you would name the fields x, y, width, height. and you should've named the parameter rectangle instead of el, or the function something like rectangleContainsPoint. so mirror would be much more likely to pull over the calculation for containing inside a rectangle. you did give chatgpt these semantics so it was kinda unfair to compare the two
let a model produce a model, let it produce a good model, let it produce a self-similar model, let it produce a better model/web App/App>>>IMPOSSIBLE>>>INFINITE LOOP :) it can helps on learning , fixing some bugs that we may not see as human just because we aren t at the mood at that time or maybe we just forget,......etc An Horizontal scale creation-object can produce : --------a less valuable similar Horizontal scale creation-object, a valuable Vertical scale object A Vertical scale creation-object can produce : --------a less valuable similar Vertical scale creation-object, a valuable Horizontal scale object my english is bad , hope you ve got the point
The positive is only for the universal spherical sandbox (extreme limits) usual starting point approximatly ? 50% of penultimate of 100% nothing = 50% of penultimate of 100% something (non academic)
Can we throw some bits at prime so that he may buy a new mic arm???? That thing has been killing me since I started watching him .... I mean at least it don't got the green screen scraps taped to it anymore ...
That is like a bridge, built by termites, and their holding hands saying "its safe". Hell naw it is not, you're putting a lot of trust on that infested bridge.
Positive integers
int a = I really love you guys.
int b = I know you can do it.
These are the kinds of integers I need in my life
Compiled error
works in Python
I work closely with a Rust team. I can confirm that they are, in fact, Furries.
Plus they have very powerful viruses
Can someone explain where this joke originated? I want to learn rust but I don't get the joke
They must be hooked up on a lot of estrogen and HRT pills with the Bad Dragon up the A. Unhinged.
@@Matthew-ir1ed You didn't understand it because it's not a joke.
@@Matthew-ir1ed Furries are people who have an interest in anthropomorphic animals, or animals with human qualities
Best quote ever! "Obviously AI is going take to all of our jobs the moment product managers can accurately describe what they want. Which means our jobs are effectively safe ad infinitum" 🤣🤣🤣. I totally agree with your sentiment.
Of course it just requires the customer to perfectly specify what they want. But when they do there won't be any need for the product manager either.
projecting at it's finest. I'm a dev and who are we kidding, we are the ones who struggle with communication skills.
@@cardiderek its everyone
@@cipher01 mostly us devs
Describe what they want is not enough. They should be experts and take responsibility for AI output.
Imagine... product manager generate entirely software and they can't even understand a single line of code. That probably cause damage to business for sure.
So... at this point, it's so much easier for engineers to take product manager responsibilities.
Even entrepreneurs have a risk more than real good engineers, because 1 employee company have a chance to created from experts more than manager.
Is this the enshitification of programming? What a time to be alive.
Nah, that was JS. Programming is ahead of the curve.
enshittification started with Python and JavaScript replacing Perl and Tcl.
@@vitalyl1327- Perl, the only language that looks the same before and after RSA encryption
@@vitalyl1327 RIP Perl 😔 I wish that a moderate to masterfull understanding of C (and maybe C++) was mandatory for all programming jobs. It is scary to see someone writing in Python or JavaScript relatively "well", but will have no idea what is going on at the fundamental level.
This is what hell looks like. Tests and no code makes me a sad panda.
I love your content. My current job sucks, but your enthusiasm for software development is literally contagious and woke me up again.I'm motivated to spend some extra time to improve my skills after work
Same. Stay strong
@@philipfisher8853 you as well!
@@philipfisher8853keep going yall - we got this.
Same reason why i watch this guy
Where programming is concerned, Prime is the proverbial man of the people. Apparently the more definite term is "culture champion." The two pop cultural characters that he tends to remind me of, are Robin Williams' character from Good Morning Vietnam, and Thrall, the Warchief of the Horde. I find that he inspires a similar type of positive emotion, to both of those.
these LLM wrapper projects often end up being worse than just using the LLMs themselves 🤣
wait until we wrap the wrappers
@@emperorpalpatine6080 and every wrapper that wraps around the wrapper is just another point of failure 😂
Eango?! You are a programmer?
the most advanced HSR theorycrafter?? sir eango??
In project LLM wrappers sound terrifying, its bad enough when LLMs are giving me unusable to downright misinformation most of the time. BTW did you make an API for prydwen?
Prime: "I played with Mirror for about 2 hours"
Some job posting on linkedin today: "At least 5 years experience with mirror."
I am so old, that when I started coding, the job was called a “programmer” not “software developer, “flow charts” were demanded as required design step and dominant language on microprocessors was assembly.
Every four to five years a new tech, language or methodology was touted as the programmer job killer. Include outsourcing to India as one these magic wands.
Not surprising to me, the results never materialized. Some did result in improved efficiency, which was instantly consumed by demand for more features.
I enjoyed charging six figures as a consultant to fix the abortions produced by these magic wands in amateur hands.
AI is no different.
I'll remember this comment 20 years from now when I decide to charge 6 figures for my consulting and continue to use flowcharts in my designs.
Thank you, gigachad 😊
You must have lived through at least two iterations of "programming without programming". I think CASE was just fading as I arrived.
Yep, this is definitely not the first India outsourcing era.. it will go the same way that it always has.
Calming music in the background while prime is shouting 😂😂😂
fr 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Perfectly balanced, as all things should be.
0:25 “when project managers can describe exactly what they want” is the biggest joke of the year. Our PM’s incompetency actually makes the team less efficient.
🤣 I was finding this comment
@@austinanil1142, me too, I had to rewind 3x
To be fair, the important quality is not to formulate good ideas, but to recognize that idea is bad promptly.
Thats what i want to do. I finally found something I love doing for work and just in general. I want to learn get better and better and it just feels like all of these tech companies are trying to take it away. It's funny you mentioned anthropic I seen a post today about how amazon partnered with them and dumped a bunch (not shit wish it was) of money into Claude. I just want to get better at my craft and be able to feed my kids with it.
The reason why AGI is gonna be so revolutionary is that it stands for AGIle Development but they actually got it working
Malformed dict 😂
7:54 This is the question to ask when someone tries to sell you a financial market trading system. If they're selling it, it doesn't work. It's that simple.
I used to get people trying to sell me investments that were "guaranteed a huge return". I used to tell them that if they could convince a bank it was guaranteed they wouldn't need to call me. It was whisky & wine at one point, then art. I'm talking long before NFTs.
rust devs taking strays will never get old
As a Rust dev and self-described regular guy, I admit it is hilarious
Not a daily Rust dev, eh it’s getting old
@@metaltyphoonBooooooo
The more I emplore AI the more I realize I am ultimately asking for LSD aligned provoctions of hallucionation and time twisting rabbit holes to achieve the ultimate goal of FML.
should I be calling an ambulance, buddy?
Finally Primagen tried Lisp, the lang, designed for AI 60 years ago where everything is a list of literals)))))
What I don’t understand as a human is how and when all of humanity started being stupid :/
It is morbidly fascinating though, right? Looking at all the symptoms of it flaring up, each day brighter and more frequent. Maybe it was the killing of Harambe adter all...
It's when we stopped replacing lead pipes with much safer materials and just let the lead leech into the water we drink. Your worldview is severely colored if you live in the U.S. because you have to explicitly seek out international media sources to get a broader perspective. I like the DW documentaries channel a lot.
Neolithic Revolution
We have always been, we just didn't have the internet to show it to everybody :D
Nah, humanity has always been stupid. It just you can see that more clearly, because you can see that stupidity in the field in which you are highly knowledgeable.
Needed Mirror dev with 10 years experience
"When you believe in things you don't understand then you suffer" - Stevie Wonder
7:40 Bros calling me out and I didn’t even write an AI coding language
There is 1 certainty for the future of programming, C will remain a much used language whenver the best performance is required.
5:10 the mic arm disconnecting from the table has certainly not gotten old yet 😂
cant really predict the future of programming but 3 things will sure change:
1. the already oversaturated IT job market is gonna get worse
2. junior positions are gonna have staff level requirements
3. orange cats are orange (nothing will be changed about this just found it funny to mention it)
2 is already a thing
Those last words boosted my confidence level Primeagen, thanks for giving me that perspective!
I'm glad I'm not the only one who feels a certain way about using regex's in a parser. Never understood why you'd do that...
The true value of a programming language like Rust ultimately comes down to whether it solves real-world problems effectively, rather than focusing solely on its target demographic aka the furries.
i pissed off a lot of people in your comment section when last time i said that I dont use AI because I actually know how to code.
I assume those aren't actually people, anytime you say anything negative about AI you get a lot of very angry messages that look suspiciously like they were generated by AI.
Do it again
@@Jeremyak I suppose he made these AIs angry.
Wow, that was a bad DSL to begin with. I have built a few to enable executable specifications, so was really disappointed to see their effort, yet quietly comforted.
The future of programming is the Primeish Language.
Int valued variables can only be prime numbers
This honestly feels like an attempt to scam money from VCs from the very beginning. It's got everything a non-tech-literate investor/manager would want, and absolutely nothing any remotely-sane programmer would want.
I agree with this sentiment, with the one caveat that I am sympathetic towards the victims of typical scams. in this case, im not so sure that I feel sorry for the product managers and investors getting scammed, but hey, perhaps im being too harsh
@@kayingayle3788 yeah I agree. I almost wanted to say this is the kind of scam I can endorse.
Is not scamming. VCs companies are not stupid, they are just riding the wave. (they know way more than tech companies about how to allocate funds) It is more scamming money from individual investors by just pumping tech stock which otherwise would be sinking due to high interest rates and no actual decent products being launched. Bubbles are very common when central banks manipulate rates, either by lowering or pumping them
Man, I love you! I would love to have you in my family!
i thought at this point he's already crossed 1 million subscribers.
great content.
When will you try out Swift?
some day
right after he tries C#
@@ThePrimeTimeagen
I asked ChatGEPETE
GPT:
Ah, got it! You're talking about The Primogen, the UA-camr who focuses on software development, particularly around Swift, iOS development, and programming best practices. Thanks for clarifying! 😊
In that case, if you're wondering when The Primogen should try out Swift, I’d say:
He already has! 😄
The Primogen is known for diving deep into various programming topics, especially Swift, and sharing his knowledge with a wide audience. He often discusses Swift-related topics and tools that enhance development productivity. But, if you're asking when he should expand or innovate with Swift (perhaps experiment with new features, frameworks, or practices)
Taylor Swift 😋
Taylor?
0:24 "Obviously AI is going to take all of our jobs the moment that product managers can accurately describe what they want which means our jobs are effective safe at infinitum" So true ! I'd add the client to project manager.
Now Imagine someplace where the product manager didn't get the memo. At first, the client is stratified with the first release, it was cheaper, it was on time, so now the client wants more and every department wants their part in the new release with contradicting specification. Because of this, the software is broken where it used to work and the new feature are never quite right. And every time the product manager try to fix something by tweaking de specification, every pieces of code is slightly change and it's broken at 15 different other places.
So funny, I'm an oracle now.
most inspirational video ever ! OMW to learn code properly!!!
This AI stuff is just becoming so exhausting... In my experience using an AI to get something done is more work than just doing myself.... Not only do you need to be able to both review and fix the code it produces, because for most cases these these tools produce nothing but shit, I also have to learn how to prompt these things correctly. I will be spending 1 hour crafting a good enough prompt that gets me what I want, only to then also spend who knows how long ensuring what it produced is actually correct, only to realise that it would've taken you 30 minutes to do it yourself.
Ask for less in your prompts. Frequently press start new chat when it goes off track.
Agreed. Especially because reading code is SO much worse than writing code. Using AI for code is like scratching your ear with your cat's tail.
it's bad for logic but I like it for busywork
like if I've made a thousand lines of new UI code with hardcoded texts I can just feed it into gpt to add localization
There already is a language that's highly optimized for AI, where the code tokenizes into the fewest amount of tokens for business logic, and it's name is Python. You can cram an insane amount of Python code into a relatively small context window.
Have @Wonderful New Year's ! / / thanks
Honestly, considering the legality now, AI. How do I even begin to think of using AI in any capacity that can get into loaded legal problems?
Sometime AI make me feel dumber.
Sometimes AI remembers me they can still invent some magical ffmpeg/libav function that just doesn’t exist.
What a joy. At least they are better than stack overflow for weird stuff
Thinking maybe Carnegie Mellon isn't what it once was...
Why AI didn't produce just machine code? Why AI depends on some programming language.
I'm a typical CS major , if I'm being brutally honest with myself I can't program to save my life. Well I can a bit ...but there's a lot of work needed..chat assist this young man in his journey of conquest!
I actually think the reverse is more useful ... here is my code, it is supposed to solve this, go and write the tests for me!
So Prime, what language would you recommend for developers (web, javascript) trying to go beyond the web and js framework madness into more of server and infrastructure. Trending new languages like Go or Rust, or Java, python or C++.
Thanks
What a gorgeous job you did, editor
That spec looks like the AI re-invented Backus-Naur.
BTW (and dope video) using Claude for json formats prob overkill-- you can just setup Ollama and use any 3-7B model fine-tuned specifically for function-call & you should be able to format the output that Claude gives you w no problem.
When you ask them to produce something novel, a lot of the time LLMs produce placebo code. At first glance it looks like it's on the money, but it's only when you grok it or run it that you realise it's not what you really wanted
I asked Claude and Gemini to program me a simple tornado using only html. Although Claude actually did an ok job for a child. It still got the shape of tornado wrong and used a circle instead of using triangles but hey. It even added in lightning. Deep seek wanted to use css and JavaScript which is more in line with how I’d do it
Amén man! This is the kind of statement that helps to think clearly and removes all the shit generated by the hype! Well say!
My view on AI: complexity/intricacy tends to have an exponential relationship to necessary effort and an inverse exponential one to available (also degrading) training material. So even with Moore's law tech progress we might have a max capacity towards which AI is heading in a ansymtotic manner. Don't we have a similar thing somewhere else?
Thank you for this video and for the message transmitted. I love to learn and be good and use AI for very few things but I can’t do things without understanding them. So I definitely prefer to learn how to code and solve problems by myself than using AI
When I read the title I thought you were onto Kronark :D
I'd be super curious what you'd have to say about them!
If you have AGI, there would be no point in keeping it for yourself because money would be obsolete, given that you can make anything without paying for it.
There would be a point in having it in more hands, because then more things get built. There wouldn't be any point in selling it, since you have no need for money.
This is kinda what they've been saying from the beginning and why they put a clause in the contract with microsoft that if they reach AGI, the profit-focused wing of the organization mustn't have any control.
ok but if someone achieves AGI, that person doesn't need to tell people "we achieved AGI", therefore that person gets every commodity in the world (eventually, some would be too expensive initially but "i have superintelligence" so with time "I can do anything").
People are selfish by nature so i dunno if your argument is 100% correct, but yes, in ideal world it could be that we don't need money anymore
@@Neuroszima For starters, I don't think sam altman would be able to own and hide AGI for himself. OpenAI has thousands of people working on this. And it would be a little suspect if OpenAI suddenly close up shop and suddenly altman is commissioning dyson spheres.
Also yes, people are selfish, but there are limits. If you have a billion dollars, you aren't losing sleep over whether you'll make another 500 tomorrow. You move up on the heirachy of needs to things that are beyond money, because money means nothing to you anymore.
This falls apart entirely when you reach post-scarcity. In a scarce world, it's somewhat of a zero-sum game. Being selfish means you might not care about someone's misfortune because it means you get to take more. But selfishness doesn't get you anywhere in a post-scarce world.
You can take all you want and nobody loses anything, and your neighbour can also take all he wants and you don't lose anything. In fact, you both gain if more people are summoning things they want. Someone may end up developing a cure for a rare cancer you didn't even know you had, or creating some kind of entertainment you couldn't have imagined. Society will progress much slower if you're the only one at the helm, and people will want your head if you're keeping the solution to everything for yourself.
You gain things with 1 decision and lose things on the other. It's an easy decision for a selfish person.
@@Neuroszima For starters, I don't think sam altman would be able to own and hide AGI for himself. OpenAI has thousands of people working on this. And it would be a little suspect if OpenAI suddenly close up shop and suddenly altman is commissioning dyson spheres.
Also yes, people are selfish, but there are limits. If you have a billion dollars, you aren't losing sleep over whether you'll make another 500 tomorrow. You move up on the heirachy of needs to things that are beyond money, because money means nothing to you anymore.
This falls apart entirely when you reach post-scarcity. In a scarce world, it's somewhat of a zero-sum game. Being selfish means you might not care about someone's misfortune because it means you get to take more. But selfishness doesn't get you anywhere in a post-scarce world.
You can take all you want and nobody loses anything, and your neighbour can also take all he wants and you don't lose anything. In fact, you both gain if more people are summoning things they want. Someone may end up developing a cure for a rare cancer you didn't even know you had, or creating some kind of entertainment you couldn't have imagined. Society will progress much slower if you're the only one at the helm, and people will want your head if you're keeping the solution to everything for yourself.
You gain things with 1 decision and lose things on the other. It's an easy decision for a selfish person.
@@Neuroszima For starters, I don't think sam altman would be able to own and hide AGI for himself. OpenAI has thousands of people working on this. And it would be a little suspect if OpenAI suddenly close up shop and suddenly altman is commissioning dyson spheres.
Also yes, people are selfish, but there are limits. If you have a billion dollars, you aren't losing sleep over whether you'll make another 500 tomorrow. You move up on the heirachy of needs to things that are beyond money, because money means nothing to you anymore.
This falls apart entirely when you reach post-scarcity. In a scarce world, it's somewhat of a zero-sum game. Being selfish means you might not care about someone's misfortune because it means you get to take more. But selfishness doesn't get you anywhere in a post-scarce world.
You can take all you want and nobody loses anything, and your neighbour can also take all he wants and you don't lose anything. In fact, you both gain if more people are summoning things they want. Someone may end up developing a cure for a rare cancer you didn't even know you had, or creating some kind of entertainment you couldn't have imagined. Society will progress much slower if you're the only one at the helm, and you obviously have things to fear if you're keeping the solution to all of life's ails for yourself.
You gain things with 1 decision and lose things on the other. It's an easy decision for a selfish person.
@@Neuroszima For starters, I don't think sam altman would be able to own and hide AGI for himself. OpenAI has thousands of people working on this. And it would be a little suspect if OpenAI suddenly close up shop and suddenly altman is commissioning dyson spheres.
This is the most electric clip The Prime has ever spat. Pure jazz.
Funny Bit: It's 4 AM in India here & the effect is being seen on my Master Prime
Serious Bit: He is just saying the truth which beginners won't listen & intermediate people would appreciate & Sr people already know so they will open the video for the fun bit.
I love watching his videos be it long or short.
The name is ❤
"it worked yesterday"
the editor is top tier
Dude as much as I like this kind of format, I think these videos should go on his main channel. I miss seeing his raw reactions and takes on blogs and videos.
Enjoyment boost tutorial:
1. Enable video captions
2. Go to 2:50
3. Enjoy the malformation
And that's how new memes are born my friends.
😂😂😂
Also at 4:00
3:45 there's nothing wrong with regexes (regrets) to be inside a parser.
[Simple] regex is a "regular language" - the one consisting only from terminal symbols. In my opinion it's close to saying that there cannot be infinitely recurring patterns (one structure xan hold another structure thwt can hold first structure).
Since numbers don't need complex structures to be parsed properly, only optional inclusion of "+"/"-"/etc. with some repetition of digits is sufficient to be handle them. Therefore, there are no terminals inside number-subparser and it can be implemented via a regex.
Not much of a knowledge I have, just generating some words based off Niklaus Wirth's "Compiler Construction" book.
L take. regex isn't a "regular language". It's a clunky-arse parser you use in a command line.
If AI got that good, It would replace the CEOs too, Right ?
5:10 that microphone went flying 😂😂😂
If you want properly formatted json use function calling
I hear ya, but my technical skills aren't valued enough right now to even get an interview so... dunno about that.
I also make tokenizers with Regex, and name them the same thing in different scopes 2024 😭
Mirror Mirror on the wall, has a parser but cant parse it all
Seems like 1st time it made a code that checks if all inputs are in el with some precision. Reasonable first guess without any verbal explanation, however, how come the code it made didn't even pass the second to last test? Don't they even run the tests to see if code works?
Seems like this might have been figured out eventually if the results were fed back with the new algo of chatgpt but it sucks anyways. You'd spent more time making the test cases and checking it made the right thing this time than you'd spend writing a simple function yourself and only making tests for edge cases, and it'd take way less electricity.
Using lists as data structures is classic approach in Desmos :)
I have been letting ChatGPT write all the custom nodes for ComfyUI in python for the past half year. Most of the time I only have to copy the error once or twice before it works.
I missed this type of video format. I miss the blazingly fast tests of Rust vs Go vs whatever
4:00 We need to clip this and store it in the meme database
the subtitles are hilarious
What about possible Clang replacers like C3, Fil-C or TrapC?
So furries are the target demographic?
maybe
I wonder why are the article videos gone for some time now
Should we start selling courses on mirror telling everyone it's the future?
I miss your daily uploads, WHERE ARE THEY?
People voted against them so here we are.
Hey, don’t reinvent the wheel right? Why make a parser when one exists already?
For real though, is 2025 your year to full send Zig?
Who doesn't love trying to reinvent the wheel?
3:30 This feels like the programmer equivalent of an artist correcting messed up hands in an AI generated picture.
Whoever develops AGI first would go full Lawnmower Man.
As pm with a cs degree, im happy that now i earn the salary of the devs and the salary of pm together
0:43 you have encouraged me to commit sudoku
It felt like there was a small touch of sarcasm in this video.
Why no twitch stream videos anymore 😔
not defending the ai's, but it might've been better if you had fixed dictionaries, because then you would name the fields x, y, width, height. and you should've named the parameter rectangle instead of el, or the function something like rectangleContainsPoint. so mirror would be much more likely to pull over the calculation for containing inside a rectangle. you did give chatgpt these semantics so it was kinda unfair to compare the two
3:14 the spec literally generated by AI,
why? 'cause I do a try with chatgpt to make a PEST format parser file, and it gave similar shit for that 😂
let a model produce a model,
let it produce a good model,
let it produce a self-similar model,
let it produce a better model/web App/App>>>IMPOSSIBLE>>>INFINITE LOOP :)
it can helps on learning , fixing some bugs that we may not see as human just because we aren t at the mood at that time or maybe we just forget,......etc
An Horizontal scale creation-object can produce :
--------a less valuable similar Horizontal scale creation-object, a valuable Vertical scale object
A Vertical scale creation-object can produce :
--------a less valuable similar Vertical scale creation-object, a valuable Horizontal scale object
my english is bad , hope you ve got the point
One of his best videos yet
I am probably going to start learning Ruby on Rails
"yaml, but with types"
- cuelang, unironically based
The positive is only for the universal spherical sandbox (extreme limits) usual starting point approximatly ? 50% of penultimate of 100% nothing = 50% of penultimate of 100% something (non academic)
The mirror stream was the greatest stream in history.
Can we throw some bits at prime so that he may buy a new mic arm???? That thing has been killing me since I started watching him .... I mean at least it don't got the green screen scraps taped to it anymore ...
That is like a bridge, built by termites, and their holding hands saying "its safe".
Hell naw it is not, you're putting a lot of trust on that infested bridge.