French and Indian War Changes Fate of America
Вставка
- Опубліковано 4 жов 2024
- The French and Indian War changed the fate of America by initiating questions over Britain's authority to restrict westward movement into the western frontier of the Ohio River Valley (The Proclamation of 1763) and to begin to the increase of taxes on the colonies to pay for the cost of this North American military struggle.
watching this shi bc of fkin history and im literally failing the class smh. actually im failing almost all my classes i seriously need help
ayy a fellow HxH fan :) but yea watching cuz of class too :(
Me too buddy
Me too....
Same we’ll get through it
SAME
bruh this is so long i hate watching this
Good video, great content, bad grade on paper.
Actually, the comments on these videos are horrendous.
I Just ate a Hotdog
Bro saaaaammmmmeeeeee
@@Steph-pw2ng I like how you commented this 6 days ago while the other guy commented this 6 years ago lol
As an 8th grade American History teacher, I found that this program is an excellent way to connect the French and Indian War with the events that lead to the Revolutionary War.
Great intro into why the Revolutionary War happened. Thanks!
Fascinating stuff. I know that the Proclamation of 1763 affected my grandmother's family. They were Frenchmen living in Pays des Illinois at the time. Because they were loyal Frenchmen who hated the British, they gladly jumped across the Mississippi River into Nouvelle-France and became some of the first settlers of Upper Louisiana (modern Missouri).
Love how only 5 people were killed, yet they call it a massacre
you said people. they only considered themselves as people
that is very ironic lol
The Boston Massacre consisted of less than 10 British soldiers against varied reports of angry colonists the least number being 200 people. The situation itself can find it's origins years before in the building frustrations of the colonials over British taxes of the 1760s. John Hancock's sloop being seized by troops around 1768 for the crime of smuggling didn't help matters. Keep in mind there was no way back then for locals to vent their frustrations except on the visible representatives of the crown in the streets. The soldiers. Which is what eventually happened on King's Street in March 1770. 200 angry colonials against 10 or so British soldiers. John Adams (Yes, one of our Founding Fathers) defended British soldiers even as King George III had offered them up to colonists to quiet the disturbance down quickly. He successfully acquitted all men save two soldiers that publicly proclaimed that they would kill colonials at the first opportunity prior to the event. Those two took the mark of the clergy, branding their thumbs and entering service to the church to avoid hanging. The people desiring revolution used the situation as a source of propaganda. The picture shown in the video of British soldiers lining up neatly in formation blasting away at helpless colonials was an engraving by Paul Revere meant to stir up outrage. So keep in mind, the heroic efforts John Adams must have had to exert to keep the trial fair. The depiction of the Boston Massacre being a example of inhuman indifference to colonial lives is not quite the true story. It was not a cold blooded act of a tyrannical regimen against it's helpless subjects but the inevitable result of massive tensions between two groups in a small space.
Im not gonna read all that but u sound smart
cool but when did i ask
@@nicholasbowers2803 A deeply preceptive and intellectual response..
@@kenbe62 I know right I'm smarter than enstin or what ever
@@nicholasbowers2803 Oh Yes, And you make it clearer with each comment..
I’m failing history
lol same
i’m having a hard time with politics
#APUSH sucks. EDIT: Its the most amazing and awesome subject in the world! [Damage control]
No it isn't, not by a streak quintrillions of light years wide
WOW I LEARNED THIS IN SCHOOL I ALREADY WATCHED THIS LOLLLLL BUT WHERE HE CHOPPED THE HEAD OF WITH THE AXE MY TEACH APOLOGIZED LOL
My professor made me watch this
i got homework cuz of this video when i had 2 giant tests the next day ughhhh
Same
The war was so powerful, and this video made me want to be alive back then.
i'm watching this for a class i'm taking and when george washington starts talking to the camera like he's about to be voted off survivor, i lose it every time
This is still underway
Geez, a half a crown for a paper tax? No wonder the Colonists were pissed...
i hate history class soooo much
I think that's Russell Means at the end doing the outro speech. He was in Last of the Mohicans and Dances with Wolves.
Graham Greene, Canadian First Nations indian. Quite famous really.
Love this
Cuz it helped me on my he
I mean hw
Nice succinct video.
Right here in Hudson valley
Right
News flash, Braddock died back in 1755
Wow, I thought Braddock was an Assassin's Creed character ubisoft made up. Oops.
@@JT33813 good god dude really? Generations keep getting dumber and dumber
Why is Benny Hill in this?
I have to write notes on this video
Red wizard me too. Lol
Didn’t the British parliament, shortly before the end of the revolutionary war, start to have plans for Australia? Exactly how much protection was London willing to give to the Amerindians, is also a big question. In the Treaty of Paris of 1783, for instance, the negotiators on the British side didn’t even bother to bring up the Indian territories east of Mississippi and West of Allegheny mountains, formerly known as the disputed territories, during their discussions with the American ambassadors.
The British parliament ironically started a new settler project in Australia shortly after. Where was the will to protect the Australian Aborigines in that case? Same goes for New Zealand. By 1780s, they had learned the lessons of creating and maintaining settler colonies. And the cost it carries in case their is a settler colonial revolt against their mother country’s policies. So why repeat the same thing in Australia and New Zealand, instead of directly administering them by bringing the Aboriginal nations of Australia and New Zealand under the British Commonwealth realm? That ways, there wouldn’t have been bloodshed and genocide, even though London would still be able to tax them and exploit them in other ways, and have them have a bare existence. Something like what they did in South Asia. Of course they’d still be able to have some penal colonies reserved for white settlers.
beautiful scenery for sure....
Thanks!
im only here because of history class
I am really confused, the Treaty of Paris was signed in 1783 and not in 1763. Listen to the first sentence.
there are 2 treaty of paris'
But I still love all of you.
i cant believe there was so much land greed and there is still exists so much greed mainly with people who work for the president
Gotta do my homework.this vedio didn't help me a bit lol.
Guys find the difference.
💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒⛪💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒💒
Second round.😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😥😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😰
Third round
🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌑🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚
Third round🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌎🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍
Finals.📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📭📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬📬
Finally finished guys😅.hope you find it
Easy
Who surrounded him Ire/ Scotia
As a history teacher in the US, no, that is not true.
Luke Miller I am a French and indian war historian that's what I want to hear
Care to elaborate which part isn't true?
What a pity that France was not more seriously worse place in America, world history would have been so different if the French would actually invested and would explusé English North America. This would have avoided many massacres and wars (The United States would probably never existed, at least not in its current form) and the fate of the Indians would have been happier
Perhaps the Native Americans would have come to France's aid against Hitler as well.
Why not, Russia has done well
With all those immigrants poring in the fate of the Indian nations was sealed
sad...........
Otherwise I'd be speaking French right now, oui oui? 🇫🇷🥐
DAMIT GOTA DO HOMEWORK
DAMIT GOTA FIX GRAMMAR
Everyone in the comments: UGH I HAVE THE WORST GRADES IN THE WORLD!!! IM GONNA FUCKING DROP OUT!!!
Me with my 89% average: 👁👄👁
I'm failing
I wonder wat is it going to be aboutttttt
It's depressing how disorganized the video is. There was poor transitioning and unnecessary asides/dialogue. The video should not be including extraneous details, like how Washington's uniform was changed into this cool apparel which reflects his new militia.
Be more explicit and concise.
What were the Americans fighting for? Why? How does this connect to the so called "Fate of America?"
We are talking about the events which led to the American Revolution, not jumping around ideas of the Stamp Act, Tea Act, and the Proclamation Act in attempts to have the audience realize that these were even causes for the need for independence. Taxes, economic discrepancy, and discontent with the authorities telling the Americans what to do from across the damn ocean is what changed the fate of America. The French and Indian War was a precursor to that. Stop revolving the video around Washington and simply explain these aforementioned ideas.
Not to mention the very distracting fireworks.
Betrayed I we still are
Nah I’m passing cus of this I think
As a proud American, I must say that this conflict between the Colonies and Britain, wasn't so much about "respect" but the greed of the Colonies. They just didn't like the fact that the mother country forbade westward expansion, to protect the natives. The many taxations that followed were only justification for rebellion.
Strictly speaking, it was not a policy to protect the Indians, although in the short term it came to the same thing, it was in reality to put a brake on the economic expansion of their colonies, because the colonies had become rich and they led a formidable competition against the merchants of London. It was therefore a way of restraining the colonial economy, of ensuring that it continues to depend on the mother country and thus to avoid in the long term that the colonies become independent (because of their wealth and their economic independence)
I wonder wat is it abouttttt
2:15
*stares*
Were the British not ahead of their time in trying to defend the rights of the native Americans?
Including mine.
Indians wasn’t white yet lol
OMG
If you found it click like. like it up guys.
Gentrification
Gentrification is a process of renovating deteriorated urban neighborhoods by means of the influx of more affluent residents. This is a common and controversial topic in politics and in urban planning. Gentrification can improve the material quality of a neighborhood, while also potentially forcing relocation of current, established residents and businesses, causing them to move from a gentrified area, seeking lower cost housing and stores.
Gentrification often shifts a neighborhood’s racial/ethnic composition and average household income by developing new, more expensive housing, businesses and improved resources.[3] Conversations about gentrification have evolved, as many in the social-scientific community have questioned the negative connotations associated with the word gentrification. One example is that gentrification can lead to community displacement for lower-income families in gentrifying neighborhoods, as property values and rental costs rise; however, every neighborhood faces unique challenges, and reasons for displacement vary.
The gentrification process is typically the result of increasing attraction to an area by people with higher incomes spilling over from neighboring cities, towns, or neighborhoods. Further steps are increased investments in a community and the related infrastructure by real estate development businesses, local government, or community activists and resulting economic development, increased attraction of business, and lower crime rates. In addition to these potential benefits, gentrification can lead to population migration and displacement. However, some view the fear of displacement, which is dominating the debate about gentrification, as hindering discussion about genuine progressive approaches to distribute the benefits of urban redevelopment strategies.
doing this for 8th grade history project boring stuff ;p
Lol I'm doing a report
well you graduated so good job
I am the senate
APUSH 4 LIFE JK
Washington was born in 1731 I think
ca.1723
12:01
@ me failing APUSH
Is it just me or is it obvious America should have helped pay for the French n Indian war
Land area red indian people
Hi
E
a
it wasnt reserved for Indians, the colonies were governed by Indians; who were also wealthy elite and slavers.
nope
@@gabfortin1976 my family owned the biggest business dynasty in british history. the slave trade. and i am Native American. research real american history and stop watching roots.
because this is USA and why would we care about germany or brazil? We care about our own, if you live in China then why would you wanna learn about India? Bilingual is what rips your country apart, you cant be a bird and a dog at the same time.
Obviously you do not uderstand the thought that for a nation to produce wealth it needs to do buisness with other countries and sell products and resources if you don't want the economy staying the same or getting worse. And besides that is just an ignorant thing to say, as us Americans expect outsiders to speak our language.