eyyy first teehee that is why sometimes you took long making your videos, you make these kind of vids the small ones, love your effort may God bless you 😄❤.
The point of that history was to demonstrate HOW you should keep the law and how to uphold it. Christ the black Messiah did it beautifully and obeyed ever bit of the law. - Both the man and the woman should have been present (Deuteronomy 22:22) - The witnesses should have been the first to stone here hence “He who is without sin cast the first stone.” which convicted the Pharisees seeing they already were in sin by bringing only the woman (Deuteronomy 17:7) - Christ not stoning her because the witnesses were already faulty and the man adulter was not present which would have been an unjust judgment (Leviticus 19:15-16) And much more.
I have never realized our comparison to this scenario before. Great parallel.
Blessings, keep explaining the word of God.
Beautifully explained Thank YOU🙏
Were so relatable to that story. I love Jesus so much
God bless u . Wow👏🏼
eyyy first teehee that is why sometimes you took long making your videos, you make these kind of vids the small ones, love your effort may God bless you 😄❤.
The point of that history was to demonstrate HOW you should keep the law and how to uphold it. Christ the black Messiah did it beautifully and obeyed ever bit of the law.
- Both the man and the woman should have been present (Deuteronomy 22:22)
- The witnesses should have been the first to stone here hence “He who is without sin cast the first stone.” which convicted the Pharisees seeing they already were in sin by bringing only the woman (Deuteronomy 17:7)
- Christ not stoning her because the witnesses were already faulty and the man adulter was not present which would have been an unjust judgment (Leviticus 19:15-16)
And much more.
So no the woman was not undeniably guilty