"The BULAVA is developed by the same people who built the TOPOL M. They have no experience in making slbm's wich is why they have had many problems with this new missile. " Bulava is well constructed. Problem is quality control on production lines and cooperation between several factories.
@laksh20 Typhoon and delta III is being replaced. Delta II was reitried years ago and Delta IV is being modified to rmain in active duty atleast for another decade. The Typhoon class was just to expencive to keep. They all needed new missiles.
"Rardars" or Radars, are used for the detection of objects in the air as it is more difficult for radio waves to travel through water, than they do through air Also, you can't passively emmit a radar wave so using radar underwater would need an EXTREMELY powerful emitter, i mean HUGE, and your position would be given up instantly, which is why SONAR is used underwater, actively it emits soundwaves to locate an object, and can passivley "listen" for sounds, while remaining undetected.
Булава имеет систему преодоления противоракетной обороны: минимальное время подготовки, повышенное ускорение при старте, маневрирование на траектории, защищённую боеголовку, ложные боеголовки, активные электронные помехи.
@harris3693 What are you mumbling about? The Typhoon hasnt been produced since the late 80s and are more or less out of service today. The last LA class submarine was commissoned in 1996.
Im agree. Though usa and russia wont go face to face in a war. Especially not a huge one where u need big daddy submarines. But its still nice to se results of science, and military fire power. It will always be talk not war and I like it.
Given the recent improvements is submerged submarine detection the value of submarines is probably lesser than 10 years ago. Of course Borei are very good sbmarines, but they too have become vulnerable. Now the "hardcore" of nuclear dterrence are Bombers. I think so because ICBMs can be intercepted, and submarines can be detected, but manned bombers with electronic countermeasures can reach their targets even against modern air defences.
best SSBM in the world! and might i add that Russia also has by far the best military on the planet today... the BMD-4 is also an extremely attractive machine!
@anisocoro Strategic bombers was something you could relly on in the 50s and 60s. A modern patroling Boomer (SSBN) has a much larger change to survive and attack its tagets. This is why almost no country is developing new Str bombers and all is rellying heavaly on submarines.
Two more Borei SSBN's are under construction, up to 12 boreis will be built by 2015 giving Russia a powerful punch. The BULAVA is developed by the same people who built the TOPOL M. They have no experience in making slbm's wich is why they have had many problems with this new missile.
unfortunately neither high nor low frequency radio waves can penetrate water surface in a any efficient and practical way, so we still have to rely on sonars. And specially on the stationary networks of sonar arrays. It's really hard to spot a sub even today. But the fact that US navy does spot Russian subs once in a while, and Russian navy doesn't spot US subs tells alot about US capabilities.
NATO navy officers are very worried about Russia's Borei class because they are both modern and powerful submarines. But Synthetic Aperture Rardars are probably able to detect them even submerged, we know that MARSIS and SHARAD radar systems are already exploring Mars soil even as deep as 1 nm under surface, The inventor of these systems are Italian, and probably gave this technology both to USA and to Russia
Yeah and US officials confirmed spotting a couple russian subs 200 miles from east coast of US. Russian officials said t hat they never stopped patrolling even in 90s ... and they were surprised that they spotted them only now.
are you sure they are cheap to mantain? it can be read that Russia will spend huge sums of money in making them to go on patrol, and that a Typhoon- even if less quiete- is a bit less expensive
I want to see the insides , central command, torpedo room, the reactor compartments and junior eights mess rooms. I wonder if these ones still have the on board gyms and jaccuzzis. The Russians like to go to war in style!
USA hasstopped the military use of SOSUS ocean acosticsurveillnce system since 1992-1993, and as she had little non- acoustic dtectors, modern subs could patrol without detection. But in 2004 University"La sapienza" Italy build aradar that is able to "see deeply under soil (and water). There are twoversions: MARSIS and SHARAD, both used for Mars scientific missions. Russia has got something symilar since 1988, Ngyìuyen says
You do not undertand the concept of Bulava. Bulava is for penetrating anti-missile system. It has !!!!flat trajectory!!!!!at the last part of distance and unexpectable behaviour of each warhead, stealth technology and so on..........Trident-2 is previous generation..
best SSBN in world still Ohio due to their Trident-II missiles. Borei still no have weapons cuz Bulava missiles still not entered ser vice.. and when they will enter - they still be worst than Trident and Trident II (((( maybe Borei more advanced as pure sub than Ohio, but as complex of sub and mssile system - hes underdog comparing to Ohio. 20 missiles with 11 000km range,2000kg payload of 12MLRV's even better than 16 with 8000km range, 1150kg payload and 8 warheads.
"The BULAVA is developed by the same people who built the TOPOL M. They have no experience in making slbm's wich is why they have had many problems with this new missile. "
Bulava is well constructed.
Problem is quality control on production lines and cooperation between several factories.
@laksh20 Typhoon and delta III is being replaced. Delta II was reitried years ago and Delta IV is being modified to rmain in active duty atleast for another decade. The Typhoon class was just to expencive to keep. They all needed new missiles.
"Rardars" or Radars, are used for the detection of objects in the air as it is more difficult for radio waves to travel through water, than they do through air
Also, you can't passively emmit a radar wave so using radar underwater would need an EXTREMELY powerful emitter, i mean HUGE, and your position would be given up instantly, which is why SONAR is used underwater, actively it emits soundwaves to locate an object, and can passivley "listen" for sounds, while remaining undetected.
Булава имеет систему преодоления противоракетной обороны: минимальное время подготовки, повышенное ускорение при старте, маневрирование на траектории, защищённую боеголовку, ложные боеголовки, активные электронные помехи.
Took a while but Russia finally got there putting a decent modern ssbn to sea,
@mnnh1 doubt any jaccuzzis are installed, Only the Typhoon class was large enough for this.
@harris3693 What are you mumbling about? The Typhoon hasnt been produced since the late 80s and are more or less out of service today. The last LA class submarine was commissoned in 1996.
Im agree. Though usa and russia wont go face to face in a war. Especially not a huge one where u need big daddy submarines. But its still nice to se results of science, and military fire power.
It will always be talk not war and I like it.
Given the recent improvements is submerged submarine detection the value of submarines is probably lesser than 10 years ago. Of course Borei are very good sbmarines, but they too have become vulnerable. Now the "hardcore" of nuclear dterrence are Bombers. I think so because ICBMs can be intercepted, and submarines can be detected, but manned bombers with electronic countermeasures can reach their targets even against modern air defences.
best SSBM in the world! and might i add that Russia also has by far the best military on the planet today... the BMD-4 is also an extremely attractive machine!
@anisocoro Strategic bombers was something you could relly on in the 50s and 60s. A modern patroling Boomer (SSBN) has a much larger change to survive and attack its tagets. This is why almost no country is developing new Str bombers and all is rellying heavaly on submarines.
Is this supposed to be replacing the Typhoon as the flagship or flagsub? It doesn't look big enough, infact, it looks similar to the DELTA type sub..
Two more Borei SSBN's are under construction, up to 12 boreis will be built by 2015 giving Russia a powerful punch. The BULAVA is developed by the same people who built the TOPOL M. They have no experience in making slbm's wich is why they have had many problems with this new missile.
Norway should buy submarine type 212A .... We need to protect our interests in the Arctic
It can't be 170 m, only Typhoons were that large..
unfortunately neither high nor low frequency radio waves can penetrate water surface in a any efficient and practical way, so we still have to rely on sonars. And specially on the stationary networks of sonar arrays. It's really hard to spot a sub even today. But the fact that US navy does spot Russian subs once in a while, and Russian navy doesn't spot US subs tells alot about US capabilities.
NATO navy officers are very worried about Russia's Borei class because they are both modern and powerful submarines. But Synthetic Aperture Rardars are probably able to detect them even submerged, we know that MARSIS and SHARAD radar systems are already exploring Mars soil even as deep as 1 nm under surface, The inventor of these systems are Italian, and probably gave this technology both to USA and to Russia
Yeah and US officials confirmed spotting a couple russian subs 200 miles from east coast of US. Russian officials said t hat they never stopped patrolling even in 90s ... and they were surprised that they spotted them only now.
are you sure they are cheap to mantain? it can be read that Russia will spend huge sums of money in making them to go on patrol, and that a Typhoon- even if less quiete- is a bit less expensive
I want to see the insides , central command, torpedo room, the reactor compartments and junior eights mess rooms. I wonder if these ones still have the on board gyms and jaccuzzis. The Russians like to go to war in style!
how many is Russia making?
USA hasstopped the military use of SOSUS ocean acosticsurveillnce system since 1992-1993, and as she had little non- acoustic dtectors, modern subs could patrol without detection. But in 2004 University"La sapienza" Italy build aradar that is able to "see deeply under soil (and water). There are twoversions: MARSIS and SHARAD, both used for Mars scientific missions. Russia has got something symilar since 1988, Ngyìuyen says
you r an expert......sorry......next time i wont
You do not undertand the concept of Bulava. Bulava is for penetrating anti-missile system. It has !!!!flat trajectory!!!!!at the last part of distance and unexpectable behaviour of each warhead, stealth technology and so on..........Trident-2 is previous generation..
Top secret)))
bullshit
1st unit of Borei class - Yuri Dolgoruky carry only 12 missiles. next units of 955 bis - will carry 16 missiles
best SSBN in world still Ohio due to their Trident-II missiles.
Borei still no have weapons cuz Bulava missiles still not entered ser vice.. and when they will enter - they still be worst than Trident and Trident II ((((
maybe Borei more advanced as pure sub than Ohio, but as complex of sub and mssile system - hes underdog comparing to Ohio.
20 missiles with 11 000km range,2000kg payload of 12MLRV's even better than 16 with 8000km range, 1150kg payload and 8 warheads.
what is WASTE WASTE
У тебя устаревшая информация.)))