Fans Proved The Amazing Spider-Man 3 is a Waste of Time

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 тра 2024
  • The CBC is an online news outlet and community delivering the latest news, rumors, and details on all things Marvel Cinematic Universe, Sony's Spider-Man, DC Comics & The DCU, Star Wars and, of course, theories & speculation.
    Visit out our Site at for the latest News ▶▶ www.cbcyt.com
    Rise & Fall of the DCEU @ • The Rise and fall of t...
    EVERY MCU Project in Development @ • Every Marvel Studios M...
    EVERY DCU Project in Development @ • Every DC Studios DCU &...
    BECOME A MEMBER Get Extra Perks and Content ▶▶ bit.ly/2ZrtL3v
    FOLLOW and FIND CBC MEMBERS
    Armin @ linktr.ee/arminies
    Tristen @ linktr.ee/itsjaychance
    Ricardo @ linktr.ee/rcimperius
    Mitch @ linktr.ee/mitch692
    LISTEN TO THE WEEKLY CBC PODCAST & Follow at
    linktr.ee/tcbcpod
    Connect with CBC:
    Facebook | rebrand.ly/3b1alzv
    EMAIL US at comicbookcaster@gmail.com
    Music:
    Royalty Free Music by audiomicro.com/royalty-free-music
    Sound Effects by audiomicro.com/sound-effects
    Intro Sound Effect from pixabay.com/sound-effects
    Armin & Shae's Page @ bit.ly/3iYLFm1
    Important: If we use you for thumbnails or in videos and do not list credit, contact us and we will fix it ASAP. Thank you (please email comicbookcaster@gmail.com) for the credit!
    Artwork for Thumbnails Credit @ www.cbcyt.com/art-credits
    Extra Note : We cover everything related to Marvel Studios, DC Studios, The MCU, The DCU, DC Comics, and Marvel Comics, Alien Vs Predator World and Films.
    When it comes to the MCU the latest from Spider-Man 4, Spider-Man's Future, Spider-Man in the MCU and the bigger Spider-verse, Madame Web, Kraven, Venom, and Marvel Studios Projects like Avengers 6 And Avengers Secret Wars, Doctor Strange 3, Deadpool 3, the X-Men, X-Men Reboot, Fantastic Four & More
    DC has a Great lineup of content as well, including Superman Legacy, Supergirl Woman of Tomorrow, Swamp Thing, Lanterns, The Authority, Batman Brave and the Bold and of course DC's Elseworlds Tales like The Batman, The Batman Part 2, Joker 2, Arkham Asylum, and the upcoming DC Comics Video Games.
    Copyright: The Comic Book Cast L.L.C
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 272

  • @voltage4176
    @voltage4176 24 дні тому +35

    It’s crazy how ever since NWH all the people who’ve been hating on Andrew’s Spider-Man started switching up all of a sudden and starting liking his Spider-Man and would go so far to defend his Spider-Man and say he’s the best and better then Tobey and how he deserves TASM3 more then Tobey getting Spider-Man 4 then they re-released these films and half of y’all don’t even show up. What a bunch of fake fans 💀

    • @raymondbermudez555
      @raymondbermudez555 24 дні тому +11

      Congrats. You figured out the Internet's big secret... Most people are all talk, but no action.

    • @2kx62
      @2kx62 24 дні тому +7

      Lil bro. There was no marketing. No body knew these were even out

    • @trueLuminus
      @trueLuminus 24 дні тому +1

      People weren't hating on Andrew's Spider-Man. They hated the movies his Spider-Man was in. Why would anyone go see those terrible films? WHY? I have those films on digital and I hate them. Why would I go to the theater to see them? WHY???? It thought Andrew was great in NWH. I prefer his ASM2 costume. I still won't go see those goofy films. I'm sure you liked Gal Gadot as Wonder Woman, right? That's a reasonable bet. Would you go see Wonder Woman 1984 in a theater re-release? I'm guessing the answer is no, so you must be a fake fan then.

    • @Mr5ickness
      @Mr5ickness 24 дні тому +4

      @@2kx62 Actually, there was marketing and people online were talking about it. So saying it wasn't marketed is just bs to say.

    • @Mr5ickness
      @Mr5ickness 24 дні тому +5

      Personally, I still don't like Andrews take on the character. I have my own opinions on it but I even re watched the tasm movies after watching no way home and yeah.. I liked it a little more then I did. But I didn't turn into a full stan for Andrew and saying he deserves tasm 3. Personally, I believe Sam Raimi deserves his Spider-Man 4 cause Sony and Avi arad stepped in and ruined Spider-Man 3. I don't believe they did the same to the tasm films but saying Tasm 3 is more dissevered to be made then Spider-Man 4 is just bs. Both movies are deserved to be made. Not one or the other.

  • @joeohh9436
    @joeohh9436 24 дні тому +16

    I strongly disagree. Why would anyone expect a movie that wasn’t received well the first time to do better with a re-release? Another dumb move by Sony. If they hired a team like they did for the video games or animated movies ,then they’d be in great shape. Andrew deserved better and everyone knows it. I’m in the small faction of people who actually enjoyed both Amazing Spiderman movies. They are not without their faults, but most of those faults come from lazy writing. The best part of those films are the actors. I love the chemistry between Andrew and Emma. I believed them. Their scenes made me smile. When Gwen died I really felt it. I would love to see a third. I would also like to see another Toby movie too! Give me all the Spiderman I can get, but get quality people who care and aren’t looking for a quick cash grab!

    • @Mr5ickness
      @Mr5ickness 24 дні тому +2

      I agree to this since I don't like the TASM movies personally. I enjoy them a little but I don't personally enjoy them cause of how they did the characters (Mainly peter) and saying they were doing more "Ultimate Spider-Man" to it (which isn't really the case cause I've been re reading the series). But I agree to saying that it was sony's fault from the beginning. Let's have both movies and not just one or the other cause it'll only get more people mad if one's made and the other isn't.

  • @ZaidQureshi-sq9xl
    @ZaidQureshi-sq9xl 24 дні тому +10

    Knowing how sucessful the re release of the Raimi trilogy was its time for Sony to act smart and get rid of their trash morbius/madame web universe and start working on Spider-Man 4 with Tobey and raimi back as the director.

  • @GoldPoptart
    @GoldPoptart 24 дні тому +56

    Why was there no kind of marketing for this? I didn’t even know these were back in theaters!

    • @RandomResearch57
      @RandomResearch57 24 дні тому +2

      Same

    • @BaithNa
      @BaithNa 24 дні тому +11

      There was, they marketed the the entire Spider-man movie catalog was returning to theaters months ago but it wasn't a massive marketing campaign because rereleased movies don't make a ton of money, Amazing Spider-man made less than your normal rereleased movie on top of that.

    • @parsaalishiri8138
      @parsaalishiri8138 24 дні тому +8

      They did the marketing of all the movies returning together Toby movies made a killing and Andrew's flop

    • @Mr5ickness
      @Mr5ickness 24 дні тому +3

      They did market it and people online here were making videos about it so saying it wasn't marketed has nothing to do with you not knowing cause everyone nowadays is on their phones and you should've seen it before.

    • @ch42965
      @ch42965 24 дні тому +2

      On the bright side, we know the sequel to Across the Spider-verse/conclusion to the Spider-Verse trilogy is gonna be 💯 awesome

  • @AaronPablos-ll3vk
    @AaronPablos-ll3vk 24 дні тому +5

    Am I the only one who wants the director's cuts for both movies? Am I the only one who knows that Avi Arad ruined the franchise?

  • @daniellanctot6548
    @daniellanctot6548 24 дні тому +12

    *_Yeeeah, but: This is SONY Pictures we are talking about! Wasting their time and money on movies nobody wants to see is what they do!_* 😂🤣😂

    • @Grimloxz
      @Grimloxz 23 дні тому

      EXACTLY. I now do not have to write this… 🤦🏾‍♂️

  • @therealparzival
    @therealparzival 24 дні тому +6

    yall keep talking about how it was relased on a monday when that dont matter because its in theaters all week

  • @laverdadescatolica5
    @laverdadescatolica5 24 дні тому +9

    People LOVED Andrew Garfield in NO WAY HOME. He was arguably the BEST part of the film. Those same people DON’T LIKE TASM, though. The best that can come out of this is including Garfield Spider-Man in SECRET WARS …. Which we know will happen already.
    Plus, time for us to have Tom Holland Spider-Man films that don’t take attention away from him and give it to Andrew or Tobey. Their time came and went. Let’s see the BEST possible Tom Spider-Man films.

    • @AntsTheaterCorner2698
      @AntsTheaterCorner2698 24 дні тому +1

      Avengers: Secret Wars will be using Spider-Man as a protagonist. They'll use Tobey, Andrew and Tom as that character is integral to that story. Tom Hardy can finally fight Garfield and Garfield is planned for more MCU films as a supporting role as Spider-Man. That's where he works best in my opinion.

    • @laverdadescatolica5
      @laverdadescatolica5 24 дні тому

      @@AntsTheaterCorner2698 SECRET WARS should kill the multiverse. No more alternate universes. Just have the MCU. People don’t want “many Spider-Man films.” They want GREAT Spider-Man films. Time for us to see Tom Holland Spider-Man fight Kingpin etc.

  • @BaithNa
    @BaithNa 24 дні тому +6

    All of your logic is sound but you should apply that same logic to all Marvel movies that fail. We don't need an Antman 4, Captain Marvel 3 or Ms Marvel season 2 because their movies are some of the biggest bombs of all time.
    Forbes recently released an article where they discovered that Quantumania recieved secret funding from Disney and its was bigger of a flop than initially thought. The Marvels might be the biggest flop of all time too. Marvel needs to stop making movies that don't have mass appeal.

    • @shamanspointofview8083
      @shamanspointofview8083 24 дні тому

      Problem is those movies still made lore than andrews re releases, but we’re destroyed profit wise by the re release of the raimi trilogy, so if tasm is good so we’re those profit wise

  • @marvelhunter0133
    @marvelhunter0133 24 дні тому +11

    Yea i think it sucks cause they wanna see him now. I dont think a lot of peoples opinions changed about the 1st 2 which is prolly why

    • @marvelhunter0133
      @marvelhunter0133 24 дні тому +2

      I personally havent been able to support it cause ive been unemployed through the entire re release

    • @dragonnet289
      @dragonnet289 24 дні тому +1

      Well people like the movies now because they realize they're good after no way home, people like Andrew Garfield as Spider-Man and want him to get another shot in his own movie

    • @BaithNa
      @BaithNa 24 дні тому +4

      ​@@dragonnet289I don't think people like the movies, they like the character

    • @marvelhunter0133
      @marvelhunter0133 24 дні тому +1

      @@BaithNa thats what im saying

    • @dragonnet289
      @dragonnet289 24 дні тому

      @@BaithNa what's wrong with Andrew Garfield Spider-Man this was a unique. Take on Spider-Man based off the comics from the '80s He has the best character development in his movies

  • @martinmorles1
    @martinmorles1 24 дні тому +7

    Andrew was great as Spider-Man , his films despite some interesting ideas however mostly sucked like I haven’t seen them since they were released

  • @NamelessGamingNG
    @NamelessGamingNG 24 дні тому +5

    It was a mistake to show the movies on a Monday... Also none of the theaters played any of the movies so I wasn't able to go see any even if I had the time. Should have been shown on weekend and at more theaters

    • @KonEl17
      @KonEl17 24 дні тому +4

      Supposedly the Raimi movies were also shown on a Monday

    • @shamanspointofview8083
      @shamanspointofview8083 24 дні тому +1

      They were playing all week guys 😂😂 and the same release schedule was done to the raimi ones which made bank, can’t argue the failure of the tasm series

    • @mateopedro1406
      @mateopedro1406 20 днів тому

      Me 2 i agree but opposite way i was busy working on Monday didn't time 2 go the movie anymore. so i love Andrew Garfield and i even watched the hacksaw ridge the best actor. and i want 2 watch the amazing Spider-Man 3 & 4 maybe in the future hopefully.

  • @andrewdowns3673
    @andrewdowns3673 24 дні тому +14

    This is just like when people were crying and complaining about Disney not making 2D animated movies anymore and yet didn't show up for Princess and the Frog and Winnie the Pooh (2011).
    If ya want the studio to do what you want, you actually gotta put your money where your mouth is people. Screaming about it online does nothing.

    • @philosotree5876
      @philosotree5876 24 дні тому +1

      Dude, this is not our fault. There was not a shred of marketing for this rerelease, or The Phantom Menace.

    • @andrewdowns3673
      @andrewdowns3673 24 дні тому +1

      @@philosotree5876 Now hold on, that is not true at all. There was plenty of marketing for the rereleases of the Spiderman movies; evidenced by the amount of people that went to go see the Raimi films.
      Also, everyone knows theater rerelease Star Wars movies every year around May the 4th.

    • @doc8013
      @doc8013 24 дні тому +2

      ​@@philosotree5876then how come the Raimi re- release and Phantom Menace did really good numbers?

    • @philosotree5876
      @philosotree5876 24 дні тому +1

      @@doc8013 How should I know, but that's besides the point. You can't deny that there was literally, (and I actually mean literally) NO MARKETING for the rerelease, I mean denying that is like saying the sky is red. I totally would've supported it if I actually knew about it, and plenty of fans can say the same.

    • @doc8013
      @doc8013 24 дні тому +2

      @@philosotree5876 re-releases don't get major marketing, ever. My point was that Raimi's movies and Phantom Menace got literally the exact same marketing and they both did good numbers. You can't blame the lack of marketing when we see those movies doing well. I like TASM movies, at least the first one, but they just don't hit like the other ones.

  • @joel7041
    @joel7041 24 дні тому +12

    I think why they flopped was bc it's a rerelease and when you release a bunch of films several weeks in a row not everyone is going to go watch it. Also rn a lot of people have exams and end of school/college things so it's hard for people to have time

    • @dreed138
      @dreed138 24 дні тому

      And they released these on Mondays. I don't know why they didn't do these on a Saturday or Sunday where alot more people would have been off and potentially made more money

    • @dellcoc
      @dellcoc 24 дні тому +6

      The Tobey movies had the same release and made much more money.

    • @dreed138
      @dreed138 24 дні тому

      @dellcoc yeah I know but what I'm saying really goes for all of them why Monday where most people would be working?

    • @joel7041
      @joel7041 24 дні тому

      @dellcoc probably bc those were more popular movies and also its when they first started releasing them, I bet home coming and no way home probably won't make much either, no way home has a chance of making decent.

    • @dellcoc
      @dellcoc 24 дні тому

      @@joel7041 Wait and see.

  • @mightybk
    @mightybk 22 дні тому +1

    Not sure these re-releases were promoted very well. Not sure it would have changed things much, but I don't know what theaters have even been showing the Spider-man series. Plus there's the issue of why should I pay $50 to take my family to see a movie I own a copy of and can watch at home on my 65-inch TV?

  • @rommelbengali
    @rommelbengali 24 дні тому +7

    Unless you do it right with this one, with zero studio interference. Which Sony and Warner Brothers love to do so much.

    • @BaithNa
      @BaithNa 24 дні тому

      There's never been a movie made without studio interference and some of the best movies are entirely driven by the studio like the MCU movies.

    • @rommelbengali
      @rommelbengali 24 дні тому +2

      @@BaithNaDo you even get what it means. Studio interference is when the studio is interfering with the directors vision for the film. For example Spider-Man 3, Zack Snyder's Justice league.

    • @doc8013
      @doc8013 24 дні тому

      ​@@rommelbengalihe's saying some of the best movies ever are ones with studio interference.

    • @adithyahelps7720
      @adithyahelps7720 24 дні тому +1

      ​​@@rommelbengaliit won't happen , sony and Marvel have an agreement that they can only make a solo spider man film only if it's in the MCU , so even if Andrew or tobey comes back it will only be in Secret Wars , other than that don't expect any solo film for Andrew , that's never gonna happen , learn to accept the reality man , you will only end up getting hurt if you keep hoping for stuff

    • @AntsTheaterCorner2698
      @AntsTheaterCorner2698 24 дні тому

      @@adithyahelps7720Kang Dynasty will be the perfect send-off for Tobey. Secret Wars could be the perfect entry point for a solo reboot of Spider-Man in the MCU. Feige has got big plans for Andrew Garfield. This could mean that he's taking on the mentor role in a film with Miles Morales. That would be cool. Similar to Peter B. Parker in spider-verse, that's where his Peter works best.

  • @Darkkent83
    @Darkkent83 24 дні тому +18

    This is the same studio that released "Madame web" and "morbius" but another Andrew spiderman is a question mark?! 🛑 It

    • @shubhangbahadur7112
      @shubhangbahadur7112 24 дні тому +4

      Yes it is. Making TASM 3 is like making Morbius 2.

    • @BaithNa
      @BaithNa 24 дні тому +3

      All of those are failures so they'd be better off investing in stuff that's successful like the Spiderverse movies or a Raimi Spider-man 4 with Tobey

    • @dragonnet289
      @dragonnet289 24 дні тому

      @@BaithNa I love those movies but we need amazing Spider-Man 3 Andrew Garfield deserved his own Solo outing as Spider-Man because he deserves it after no way home

    • @ch42965
      @ch42965 24 дні тому +3

      I knew the re-releases of those movies were a terrible idea and just another cash grab nostalgia trip. Beyond the Spider-verse on the other hand will actually be worth the time and money

    • @ch42965
      @ch42965 24 дні тому +2

      FYI, of there's any version of Spider-Man that deserves to return after their respective cameos are TV shows like TAS, Unlimited and Spectacular

  • @Attivian
    @Attivian 24 дні тому +1

    Main reason I didn't bother catching it in theaters again for the 3rd time is because I really don't want to see Gwen's head bounce off the concrete like a basketball. The major saving grace of that movie as a Spider-Man fan is the natural chemistry between Andrew and Emma and it's a shame she dies, I know comic lore and all that but damn man.

  • @jaredofmo
    @jaredofmo 24 дні тому +2

    Armin, what's up with your mic? It's been sounding a little muffled the past few days.

    • @davidletarte214
      @davidletarte214 24 дні тому +1

      it's always the quietest mic on youtube, if i'm driving on the highway i can't even watch his videos

  • @rosssnyder4490
    @rosssnyder4490 24 дні тому +3

    What they should do is a Spiderverse animated anthology, focusing on a different spiderman each in an hour long episode or two, and finish up the Amazing Spiderman plot threads.

    • @2kx62
      @2kx62 24 дні тому +1

      NO. Andrew needs a movie.

    • @rosssnyder4490
      @rosssnyder4490 24 дні тому

      @@2kx62 why? What would be the difference between a movie & a two part animated hour long episodes? Animation would allow for things that live action couldn't do or at least do easily.

    • @ch42965
      @ch42965 24 дні тому +1

      Can't we just let Spider-verse do it's own thing, it doesn't need finish up plot threads from the live action movies. Also, Lord and Miller said that after the trilogy ends with BTSV, that's it.

    • @rosssnyder4490
      @rosssnyder4490 24 дні тому +1

      @ch42965 I just figured if people really wanted to continue to see Andrew Garfield as Spiderman, that would probably be a good way to do it.
      It would be its own thing. The Amazing Spiderman would be like 2 episodes at most. Essentially, it would be Sony's answer to the What If series on Disney+.

  • @Blacgodspirit
    @Blacgodspirit 18 днів тому +1

    I strongly disagree. The merchandise & the tickets sold were for an asset of the past. TASM 4 would be entirely new

  • @JustMe-om2dk
    @JustMe-om2dk 24 дні тому +2

    Or maybe people don’t want to pay more money to watch a 10 year old movie which they can watch for free at home!

    • @williamakaface
      @williamakaface 24 дні тому

      Yes 🙌 exactly

    • @ericdxfan511
      @ericdxfan511 24 дні тому +1

      1. People paid to see the Raimi films. 2. The tickets are extremely cheap

  • @loriengoode9510
    @loriengoode9510 24 дні тому

    While I'm not sure what the minimum box office numbers would need to be from a re release to show interest in making another film, but i didn't get any of the films in my theaters or in the next town over. If this was meant to be how they look into make new sequels, then they should of tried to release it everywhere. We got the other rereleases from the past month which makes me wonder if they even tried to get them released everywhere

    • @EmperorDxD
      @EmperorDxD 24 дні тому

      It didn't even make a million

  • @nendoakuma7451
    @nendoakuma7451 24 дні тому +1

    I agree, although I bet it would do better than Morbius 2. Sony’s options are kind of limited.

  • @noiisserpmii
    @noiisserpmii 24 дні тому +1

    Social media is not indicative of who will support theaters. Bunch of basement dwelling ppl who never leave their homes. Wish companies would stop wasting time…BUT its SONY so i like seeing them fail.

  • @allantellez1364
    @allantellez1364 24 дні тому +4

    I would definitely go watch an amazing Spider-Man 3 maybe even twice if it’s in my local theaters and if it is a good film. The nearest theater that was showing this movie was an hour away and on a Wednesday maybe a Friday I would have drove to watch it but a Wednesday? Idk

    • @shamanspointofview8083
      @shamanspointofview8083 24 дні тому

      Yeah, but Sony did this to see which Spider-Man had the most money making potential, so it’s not going to happen with the piss poor performance of both tasm movies, they each had a week, same as raimi trilogy, difference is one raimi movie made double both tasm movies made total, but first raimi one did that on one day, two films two weeks made less money than one movie in one day, which would you support to make a sequel to?

  • @2kx62
    @2kx62 24 дні тому +2

    I don’t think this automatically mean tasm 3 is a waste of time, first off there no marketing that these movies was rereleased, it flew right under the radar, 2nd from what I can remember when no way home came out, there were more people coming out of the theater and talking about andrews arc and how they would demand a tasm 3 almost more than anything else that happened in that movie. Tasm 3 hype is drastically huge and people will still like to see Andrew get another chance.

    • @Mr5ickness
      @Mr5ickness 24 дні тому +4

      Okay 1st off, there was marketing online and through creators like Armin here on youtube and yet you people are still saying that there wasn't any marketing.. 2nd, That's what you were hearing at your theater when people were leaving but that doesn't mean everyone was saying that about the movie. Yes Andrew had a good arc. Congrats to him. But that doesn't mean toby didn't have a good arc as well. We want to see toby get his 4th movie for the same reason as andrew. They didn't both got ruined by sony and their ways of wanting to control what happens. So if anything, Stop saying that one movie deserves to be made/released over the other. Your just causing more problems. Both movies deserve to be made if possible to those who enjoy those characters and such.

    • @ch42965
      @ch42965 24 дні тому

      Nah. Beyond the Spider-verse >>>>>>

    • @2kx62
      @2kx62 24 дні тому

      @@ch42965 I agree but we need tasm 3 to.

    • @adithyahelps7720
      @adithyahelps7720 24 дні тому

      ​@@ch42965beyond the spider verse will come out either ways lol, so don't worry about that

  • @kevinrivera2084
    @kevinrivera2084 24 дні тому +18

    we just need a good script for Andrew G, he still a great spiderman

  • @aroccoification
    @aroccoification 24 дні тому +2

    Oh please... It's their own fault for only playing the movies on Mondays. Who isn't working that day? Would have loved to watch all of them but I'm not taking off work to see spiderman

    • @shamanspointofview8083
      @shamanspointofview8083 24 дні тому +2

      They weren’t just playing on a Monday, that was release date, not the total airing dates, each had a week, and tbh, even if that wasn’t the case, one raimi movie made more than both tasms on this release, that means they are at least twice S profitable as the tasm movies

    • @aroccoification
      @aroccoification 24 дні тому

      @@shamanspointofview8083 god damn it

  • @parkerpshebnisky1051
    @parkerpshebnisky1051 24 дні тому +1

    The web-verse(2012 to 2014) is over🕷

  • @leogatsbyfilms672
    @leogatsbyfilms672 14 днів тому +2

    This video aged poorly, and I don't like this bashing of TASM over nothing. We have the Tom Holland movies, which performed worse. So NO. Fans did NOT prove that TASM 3 is a waste of time.

  • @nickneyra
    @nickneyra 24 дні тому +2

    literally the reason no one went out is bc the amazing movies r on netflix and disney +

    • @BaithNa
      @BaithNa 24 дні тому +1

      The Raimi movies are available on streaming and people went to see those during their re-release. Even Phantom Menace did better than both of the Amazing Spider-man movies combined during its re-release. People just don't like the Amazing Spider-man movies.

    • @parsaalishiri8138
      @parsaalishiri8138 24 дні тому +1

      So is Rami movies and those made a killing at the box office

  • @dgrabbidrebel8742
    @dgrabbidrebel8742 24 дні тому

    I honestly didn't know they were re-releasing any films I only saw they were showing Star Wars when I went to see the Apes movie

  • @robertcoggeshall3071
    @robertcoggeshall3071 24 дні тому

    I think a brand new one would do pretty well. With the prices at theaters today, who's going to spend money on a movie you can stream?

  • @misslanapaulford
    @misslanapaulford 24 дні тому

    Probably because we didn't know.
    Nothing was said and advertised over here in England 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 I can't speak for whether it was advertised in America 🇺🇸 😮

  • @ethankillion786
    @ethankillion786 24 дні тому

    It’s been almost a decade since the last one and we’ve had a new Spider-Man since them, realistically why would it happen? It makes no sense financially

  • @Supherodude
    @Supherodude 24 дні тому +1

    It doesn’t make sense to bring Andrew Garfield back at this point. We already have a Peter Parker in the MCU with Tom Holland. People need to accept that Garfield’s time as Spider-Man is over.

    • @AntsTheaterCorner2698
      @AntsTheaterCorner2698 24 дні тому

      He's not coming back to a solo franchise. Avengers: Secret Wars is going to include Garfield Holland and Maguire all as important characters in the story. NWH marked a return for Garfield as a supporting role and maybe even lead, but this time in the MCU. Kevin feige's got big plans for Garfield and Holland. Garfield wanting to fight an alien might actually pay off in secret Wars with Tom Hardy's Venom. Kang Dynasty will feature Tom Holland as the lead and Andrew Garfield has an important role. They're really diving head first into the 3 Spider-Men becoming integral. It sounds exciting and like they're giving Andrew the respect he deserves.

  • @jorgegarcia4160
    @jorgegarcia4160 23 дні тому

    I think that Garfield’s spidy is a great character planted in a horrible story line, of course people will not watch.
    However that same reason didn’t stopped WB for giving us 2 suicide squad and a birds of prey movies

  • @addictstatic
    @addictstatic 24 дні тому +1

    You easily combine Andrews spiderman in another of the marvel projects. I mean variants abound and continuity is for the diehards. Throw the characters into some of the projects already developing. Same with venom or the scarlet spider or even kaine. There is a massive roster of characters and seriously most of their current shows lacked substance after hours wasted with the belief characters like echo could carry anything longer than an hour. Maybe have a marvel entertainment presents and have like three mini movies told over a 90 minute runtime like what if or marvel comics presents from the early nineties

  • @parsaalishiri8138
    @parsaalishiri8138 24 дні тому +2

    Yep

  • @peterquinones2169
    @peterquinones2169 24 дні тому

    See I definitely would’ve showed up for you me Spider-Man one and two but unfortunately, my movie theater closest to me was not showing it and I don’t have a car to drive an hour away which saddens me because I love all the Spider-Man movies even the ones dark considered bad and would’ve loved to relive All parts of my life

  • @kevinlockhart2000
    @kevinlockhart2000 24 дні тому

    From what I've heard they didn't do a good job marketing the return of tasm movies, of course its going to fail. Tasm 3 isn't a waste of time and or money, if anything its sony's fault for not making those films or throwing attention to begin with.

  • @ch42965
    @ch42965 24 дні тому +1

    At least Beyond the Spider-verse is gonna be worth the experience and every penny

  • @chemostar2361
    @chemostar2361 24 дні тому

    andrew should be spider man for venom 3 but i don't think theres any point in continuing tasm

  • @mysticduel
    @mysticduel 24 дні тому

    The Amazing Spider Man 3 with good marketing would do better than Madam Web, Kraven The Hunter, Morbius or whatever spinoff they decided to greenlit

    • @BaithNa
      @BaithNa 24 дні тому

      Saying it would do better than some of the biggest flops in cinematic history isn't saying much

    • @Brandonweifu
      @Brandonweifu 24 дні тому

      That's a low bar you set for TASM
      Kinda insulting

  • @16shogunelitegreen
    @16shogunelitegreen 24 дні тому +3

    "The Amazing Spider-Man 3 is a waste of time and money". Don't talk bollocks, there are plenty of folk who want to have TASM3 made. And I'm obviously one of them.

    • @shamanspointofview8083
      @shamanspointofview8083 24 дні тому +2

      Well, did you go vote by seeing their re release?
      Cause barely anyone showed up for those compared to raimi trilogy

    • @16shogunelitegreen
      @16shogunelitegreen 24 дні тому +2

      @@shamanspointofview8083 It never re-aired here in the UK. I would have done so if it had

    • @shamanspointofview8083
      @shamanspointofview8083 24 дні тому +3

      @@16shogunelitegreen fair, but I don’t think any of them aired outside us really, I only heard about American theaters taking part

  • @death12555
    @death12555 24 дні тому

    This aside, I still believe an amazing spiderman 3 would have made more money than morbius, madam web and kraven combined.

  • @KenofLyoko4
    @KenofLyoko4 24 дні тому

    They can’t expect those movies to have gotten anywhere close to the Raimi films re-release. Andrew Garfield may have had his redemption with No Way Home but it doesn’t change the fact that those movies were not that good hence the reason not as much profit for those movies upon re-release. I may not care for those movies, but I still say a third movie should happen given the story that come from Garfield’s Spider-Msn being re-invigorated.

  • @GPonsell86
    @GPonsell86 24 дні тому

    With inflation being out of control like it is, Why would i waste my money going to see something OLD? These stats shouldn't reflect the potential of something NEW. And obviously marketing has to be a factor.

    • @adithyahelps7720
      @adithyahelps7720 24 дні тому +1

      Even tobey's films were marketed the same , no special love for those as well and yet all 3 managed to earn 2-3 million each , people like Andrew as spider man , but that doesn't change the fact that his movies are not the best

  • @Jung264
    @Jung264 24 дні тому

    I don’t agree with testing the waters for a next installment by rereleasing an older product. Capcom has done this with Darkstalkers and now more then likely Darkstalkers is dead even tho fans want a new one. With that being said I was not blowing money and a movieseries that wasn’t good Tams was an ok start but tasm2 was kinda trash. The only good thing in those movies are Pete’s and Gwen’s chemistry

  • @happyhogan40
    @happyhogan40 24 дні тому

    They didn't advertise the Re-leases……and they put them In limited theaters……..

    • @BaithNa
      @BaithNa 24 дні тому +2

      That's how rereleased movies usually operate.

    • @happyhogan40
      @happyhogan40 24 дні тому

      @@BaithNa doesn't make it anymore dumb plus sony never did that with Spiderman No Way Home when that got re-released also sony as a well documented history of poorly advertising their new releases as well and he knows this so this whole video and what you said doesn't wash……….

  • @ericdxfan511
    @ericdxfan511 24 дні тому +1

    MakeTASM3 has always been a joke. They played a part in that movie never happening whereas Raimi fans got screwed over when it came to Spider-Man 4

    • @AntsTheaterCorner2698
      @AntsTheaterCorner2698 24 дні тому

      Yeah. Zack Snyder's Justice League was a different beats when it came to the petition and studio support. Snyder wanted to get that film made and Joss Whedon screwed the studio over. Fan petitions don't work the way people thought they do, that's why TASM 3 will never happen. Let's just admit that Garfield works better as a supporting character to other films.

    • @ericdxfan511
      @ericdxfan511 24 дні тому

      @@AntsTheaterCorner2698 How did Whedon screw the studio over? He had to rush and get that movie out because greedy execs wanted their bonuses. Snyder should've been fired a long time ago

    • @AntsTheaterCorner2698
      @AntsTheaterCorner2698 24 дні тому

      @@ericdxfan511 I didn't know that. I thought that Zack Snyder's Justice was supposed to get made. I feel like he just made it for the fans and not for the studio.

  • @Samsung_Knignt
    @Samsung_Knignt 24 дні тому

    Aren't re-releases doing bad in general?

  • @notmephisto1375
    @notmephisto1375 24 дні тому

    TASM performed what we in the industry refer to as the Morbius Sweep!

  • @Darkkent83
    @Darkkent83 24 дні тому +5

    How is this evidence?! People want a new movie, not movies that are over a decade old!

    • @wolfgang6442
      @wolfgang6442 24 дні тому

      Yea true!

    • @dragonnet289
      @dragonnet289 24 дні тому +2

      Yeah they're no evidence of that I guess Armin didn't know the reason why it didn't do well because they were released on a Monday and it's not in every country

    • @dellcoc
      @dellcoc 24 дні тому +2

      It is evidence in the way that Tobey's movies made a lot more money in these re-releases.

    • @Mr5ickness
      @Mr5ickness 24 дні тому

      @@dragonnet289 Actually, He does know that those were the reasons. And no one really knows why it was only in select theaters on a monday and only in the us. Probably because sony was only able to do it that way or that's how re releases works.

  • @olliesmith2890
    @olliesmith2890 24 дні тому

    What a daft statement again Armin. So a third TASM movie would not be greenlit, just because a rerelease in cinemas flop. I doubt many even knew it had a rerelease.

  • @brycebirkinbine4119
    @brycebirkinbine4119 24 дні тому

    Had no clue it was happening

  • @nigelhampton5526
    @nigelhampton5526 24 дні тому +1

    I disagree, I just think that Tasm 3 just needs the right director and right studio aka Marvel Studios. After No Way Home they already set Andrew's Spiderman up for a perfect conclusion to his trilogy with Venom and the return of gwen stacy via the multiverse.

    • @Mvltimccn_editzz
      @Mvltimccn_editzz 24 дні тому +2

      it has a great director just not the right writers

    • @AntsTheaterCorner2698
      @AntsTheaterCorner2698 24 дні тому

      They're so desperate for a Sinister 6 film that everything they touch gets poorly written. The director is good, the writing and plotting isn't. Producer Laura Zizkin made Spider-Man films legendary. If they get someone that has the spirit of her energy and creative control, they'll be good. Sony doesn't want to make money. They want to lose as much as possible until Feige talks with them over what they did wrong like with TASM 2. He knows that they can't do that and that it's going to fail if they try it. NWH had the right director, writers and story. He was a supporting character, which worked better anyway. If he wants a series of solo films, it won't be TASM. It will be set in the MCU with a new name, Garfield to star. Kevin Feige already has big plans for Garfield and Holland.

  • @johnashton4776
    @johnashton4776 24 дні тому

    Marvel could re-release many of their films people will go and watch the movie again, poor marketing never seen an advertisement any where.

    • @Brandonweifu
      @Brandonweifu 24 дні тому +1

      Toby movies did excellent tho so BS excuse

  • @G1Grimlock94
    @G1Grimlock94 24 дні тому +1

    Not confirmed

  • @displayname1151
    @displayname1151 24 дні тому

    No it’s a re release a lot of people are not going to spend their money on a movie they have at home. And for the people that would watch it again how will they know the movie is re released when there is no advertisement.

    • @ericdxfan511
      @ericdxfan511 24 дні тому +1

      Yet Spider-Man 2/3 made over a Million in limited theaters and Spider-Man 1 made close to a Million

  • @jayvardy
    @jayvardy 24 дні тому +4

    This is genuinely such a bad take.
    The rereleases were released to less than 500 theatres on a Monday. They drew way more than average for a Monday release of even new movies. Actually look at the numbers.

    • @shamanspointofview8083
      @shamanspointofview8083 24 дні тому +1

      Bad counter, they were there all week, and the raimi ones trashed them ticket wise, also the tasm movies this round made less than the flops of marvel so yeah, kinda not an argument to only count one day of the week

    • @jayvardy
      @jayvardy 24 дні тому +1

      ​@@shamanspointofview8083they literally weren't there all week. And, no, the Raimi films didn't trash them at all. None have made over a million and none have made over 2K per screen.
      TASM and TASM 2 drew more per screen than every other movie those days except for Planet of The Apes which was only on its 4th day of release.
      Actually look at the numbers.

  • @ChaosHornet
    @ChaosHornet 24 дні тому +2

    I’m finding it difficult to see the logic in your conclusions here.
    Just because people didn’t go to see ASM2 in the theaters upon re-release doesn’t mean that they wouldn’t support Andrew in a well crafted ASM3.
    I think there’s a lot of good will out there for Andrew Garfield’s version of the character… and I think it’s a mistake to sideline that potential just because people didn’t go to see the re-release of a movie that was never considered to be very good and which has played on cable about 10 million times since it’s initial release.
    Get Marvel involved so Sony can’t just go and screw it up and people would very likely make sure it was a hit.

    • @dragonnet289
      @dragonnet289 24 дні тому

      I agree I'm not a fan of his evidence Because it was released at a bad day which was Monday but it also got a lot of views on TV

    • @loogiman8491
      @loogiman8491 24 дні тому

      Plus, it's Spider-Man. The character is at a point now to where if you slap his name on anything, it'll sell. Everyone and their grandma knows who the character is and NWH and the Spider-Verse films prove there can be more than one spider.

    • @loogiman8491
      @loogiman8491 24 дні тому

      @@dragonnet289 And it also didn't release in every theater. And I could be wrong (feel free to correct me if I am), but I'm pretty sure these rereleases are only happening in America.

    • @BaithNa
      @BaithNa 24 дні тому

      Good will towards a character doesn't equate to money at the box office. This is a business, kid.

    • @dragonnet289
      @dragonnet289 24 дні тому +1

      @@loogiman8491 yeah it only release in America

  • @danmercer7438
    @danmercer7438 24 дні тому

    End of the day Sony us to naive to make a good spider man movie weather it’s Andre or Tobey. I’m more of an amazing spider man fan than tobey. They make spider man 4 or amazing spider man 3 I’ll go watch both of them cuz it’s something new.

  • @Mr5ickness
    @Mr5ickness 24 дні тому

    Everyone is saying that there wasn't any marketing when in a way there was and no one saw it. And this only makes me laugh cause everyone wants ASM 3 over Spider-Man 4 (Sam Raimi) when it's clearly showing that more people are showing that they want Spider-Man 4 (Sam Raimi) more then ASM 3. And nobody realizes anymore that Sony/Avi Arad ruined Spider-Man 3 and when if they continued to let sam raimi do his thing, it would've worked out.

  • @LongLiveTheKingMusic
    @LongLiveTheKingMusic 24 дні тому +1

    You're wrong but ight.

  • @jeremycarrigan9044
    @jeremycarrigan9044 19 днів тому +1

    You shut your mouth with your data and statistics! We need more Amazing Spider-Man movies!

  • @ericmacgillivray537
    @ericmacgillivray537 24 дні тому

    If it was pointless no way home would not exist

  • @KonEl17
    @KonEl17 24 дні тому +5

    Exactly fake bandwagon fans from No Way Home didn't actually give two shits bout TASM.

  • @flaycont1800
    @flaycont1800 24 дні тому

    By that logic star wars episode 3 shouldn't have been made

    • @BaithNa
      @BaithNa 24 дні тому +1

      That's a false equivalency because Episodes 1 and 2 did amazingly in their original runs and we're talking about rereleased movies. The Phantom Menace's rerelease earned more than double what both the Amazing Spider-man movies made combined.

  • @mr.frizzyizz5058
    @mr.frizzyizz5058 24 дні тому

    No one told Sony to rerelease the amazing Spider-Man and the other Spider-Man movies lol people have already watched those.

    • @ericdxfan511
      @ericdxfan511 24 дні тому +2

      Yet the Tobey ones did well 😂

    • @mr.frizzyizz5058
      @mr.frizzyizz5058 24 дні тому

      @@ericdxfan511 funny thing is you’re right.

  • @Duma2011
    @Duma2011 24 дні тому +1

    TASM is a dead brand. Andrew should only be a supporting character in multiverse movies.

    • @AntsTheaterCorner2698
      @AntsTheaterCorner2698 24 дні тому

      He's not coming back to a solo franchise. Avengers: Secret Wars is going to include Garfield Holland and Maguire all as important characters in the story. NWH marked a return for Garfield as a supporting role and maybe even lead, but this time in the MCU. Kevin feige's got big plans for Garfield and Holland. Garfield wanting to fight an alien might actually pay off in secret Wars with Tom Hardy's Venom. Kang Dynasty will feature Tom Holland as the lead and Andrew Garfield has an important role. They're really diving head first into the 3 Spider-Men becoming integral. It sounds exciting and like they're giving Andrew the respect he deserves.

  • @JoseDiaz-ou3yi
    @JoseDiaz-ou3yi 24 дні тому

    the dumbest take i’ve ever heard. just because they don’t show up for re release don’t mean they don’t want tasm 3

  • @angelochoa602
    @angelochoa602 24 дні тому

    Maybe it's not that, people just forgot about that movie😅
    Not because we don't want to see it it's because we forgot!❤😅

  • @nerdyoutube7847
    @nerdyoutube7847 24 дні тому +3

    Just because we liked him in nwh doesn’t mean we suddenly are dying to go see decent and mediocre films that we’ve already seen. Just means we’d be happy to give him another chance

  • @KJizzleMAne
    @KJizzleMAne 24 дні тому

    I would honestly like to see Sam and Tobey’s Spider-Man 4 rather than Andrew’s TASM 3

    • @Mr5ickness
      @Mr5ickness 24 дні тому +1

      I agree but I believe it's better to get both then one over the other.

  • @anthonylococo1368
    @anthonylococo1368 24 дні тому +1

    First video I disagree with

  • @thegodofslayerentertain2678
    @thegodofslayerentertain2678 24 дні тому

    Is Not a Waste of Time. This Movie Needs a God of War Style

  • @kicknowledgesmith8608
    @kicknowledgesmith8608 24 дні тому

    ok then apply the same logic to Antman and the Marvels. Both films flopped, so that proves the majority aren't demanding more from those characters. but you defend Captain Marvel and call other people trolls for saying nobody wants her.

  • @philosotree5876
    @philosotree5876 24 дні тому +2

    WHY ARE YOU BLAMING US? There was no damn marketing; how are we supposed to support something we have no idea is happening until it's over?

    • @adithyahelps7720
      @adithyahelps7720 24 дні тому +1

      There was a lot of marketing from Sony , if you are a real spider man fan you should be up to date with the spider man stuff, tobey's films earned more than 2M for all of its re release but Andrew's performed bad , it's not about marketing, all are fake fans and nothing else! Only spider man fans are watching these re releases and still tobey's ones managed to do Millions , this is only the fans to blame none else, if you thought there was no marketing trust me sony was literally posting about it every single day all over its social media from day 1

    • @philosotree5876
      @philosotree5876 24 дні тому +2

      @@adithyahelps7720 Your argument lost any and all legitimacy upon the invoking of the "not a real fan" argument.

  • @DX_YT_01
    @DX_YT_01 24 дні тому

    Tasm 1 didn't do bad? it was a success to Sony
    tasm 2 other hand failed

  • @CalebByRamen
    @CalebByRamen 24 дні тому

    Nah, your title is wrong. They wanna see a better movie made with Andrew Garfield, not paying more money to see the very flawed first 2 movies again. Also most people didnt know Sony was even doing this.

    • @carmelosmith8782
      @carmelosmith8782 24 дні тому +2

      I disagree, the Tobey Spiderman had far more people attending than tasm so the people not knowing wouldn't make any sense

    • @adithyahelps7720
      @adithyahelps7720 24 дні тому +1

      all of tobey's movies did 2-3 million each, so clearly some amount of people knew about it

  • @cjmarugg2340
    @cjmarugg2340 24 дні тому

    I disagree

  • @KGreen-wz5xr
    @KGreen-wz5xr 24 дні тому

    So I will make a Analogy to see if I got this right what your saying is you made kool aid with no sugar we told you we didn’t want that then you added sugar we all liked it and said make more of this and you bought out the kool aid with no sugar and you think we don’t like look aid

  • @generalcoulter
    @generalcoulter 24 дні тому

    It was my least favorite

  • @davidletarte214
    @davidletarte214 24 дні тому +3

    it's nothing personal against garfield, the TASM movies are just hard to watch.

    • @Mr5ickness
      @Mr5ickness 24 дні тому +3

      I agree. Andrew and Emma had good chemistry for sure and her death was a good part of the films as well.. but besides that in my opinion were the only good things that happened out of it.

  • @anthonyness5360
    @anthonyness5360 24 дні тому +3

    THANK YOU FOR FINALLY REALIZING IT!!!!!🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

  • @kumbi8368
    @kumbi8368 24 дні тому +1

    It's a real tragedy. . .
    Anyway Sony! About Sam Raimi Spiderman 4!

  • @shubhangbahadur7112
    @shubhangbahadur7112 24 дні тому +2

    At this point, making TASM 3 is like making Morbius 2.

    • @DX_YT_01
      @DX_YT_01 24 дні тому

      TASM 3 would make more money than Morbius 2
      terrible comparison

    • @shubhangbahadur7112
      @shubhangbahadur7112 24 дні тому

      @@DX_YT_01 More memes for sure. The money part I doubt.

    • @DX_YT_01
      @DX_YT_01 24 дні тому

      @@shubhangbahadur7112 Dawg Morbius 1 didn’t even make it’s budget back
      Tasm 2 may have not made a billion but it sure as hell made it’s money back
      Morbius 2 would make less than Morbius 1

    • @shubhangbahadur7112
      @shubhangbahadur7112 24 дні тому

      @@DX_YT_01 It's not about the past rather the future.

    • @DX_YT_01
      @DX_YT_01 23 дні тому

      @@shubhangbahadur7112 and somehow you know Tasm 3 would make as much money as Morbius 2?
      Good joke

  • @baileyrowe15
    @baileyrowe15 24 дні тому

    Here’s why you’re wrong. Re-releases don’t prove what fans want. If they want to watch it they can click on their tv. Not everyone wants to go to the theater for a movie they already saw. You’re acting like the raimi films made 10M each on their re release

    • @ericdxfan511
      @ericdxfan511 24 дні тому +2

      Raimi films did extremely well based on the 466 Theaters it was released in and 2 & 3 made over a Million Dollars each.

    • @adithyahelps7720
      @adithyahelps7720 24 дні тому

      The thing is , if fans are soo supportive of Andrew to get his 3rd film, they should show up to support him when time comes as well, cause i see a lot of support for him online but when it comes to irl , i don't see anyone supporting and showing up to the theatres , if this goes on nobody's going to show up for amazing spider man 3 as well, you really expect Sony to make a good film after delivering 2 absolute disasters? And just so you know all of tobey's movies did more than 2 or 3 million , a single tobey spider man film gathered more money than two tasm films combined , if this doesn't tell you that most of these Andrew fans out there online are fake then nothing will

    • @baileyrowe15
      @baileyrowe15 24 дні тому

      @@ericdxfan511is that a quality difference or the fact that those came out 2 decades ago and most people didn’t get to see them in theaters so now’s they’re chance. It doesn’t mean people wouldn’t go see another tasm. Even that, you think that’s a lot of money?

    • @baileyrowe15
      @baileyrowe15 24 дні тому

      @@adithyahelps7720you think TASM 1 was a disaster? Look at the box office before you comment.

    • @adithyahelps7720
      @adithyahelps7720 24 дні тому +1

      @@baileyrowe15 510K collection across 466 locations , is that what you call a hit? ☠️ Definitely a disaster

  • @djslay3r98
    @djslay3r98 24 дні тому +2

    Strongly disagree

  • @josephdan2850
    @josephdan2850 24 дні тому +1

    Amazing Spider-Man 3 should happen with Andrew Garfield. But Sony does need new Chairman and President of Sony Pictures.

  • @assassinsknight
    @assassinsknight 24 дні тому +1

    You’re missing the point Armin. Talk about how the Raimi trilogy did. It made almost 3 million for 3 combined Mondays. Spider-man 4 deserves to happen.

  • @dragonnet289
    @dragonnet289 24 дні тому +52

    I disagree It's not a waste of time wanting amazing Spider-Man 3 It's going to happen Andrew Garfield deserves another chance I'm his own solo movie

    • @killerwolff3048
      @killerwolff3048 24 дні тому +23

      To Sony it looks like no one wants because the fans didn't talk with their wallets unfortunately

    • @dragonnet289
      @dragonnet289 24 дні тому +4

      ​​​@@killerwolff3048It was because the amazing Spider-Man movies re released on a Monday and we're not in every country

    • @killerwolff3048
      @killerwolff3048 24 дні тому +23

      @dragonnet289 so were the raimi movies the previous few weeks and they made significantly more money

    • @BaithNa
      @BaithNa 24 дні тому +5

      Garfield doesn't "deserve another chance", he had 2 movies and a big role in No Way Home. I'd like to see him as the Spider-man of the Venom movies but he also had plenty of opportunities and it's time for other actors to have one as well.

    • @itsme-uw8vm
      @itsme-uw8vm 24 дні тому +5

      My guy. it didn't make money

  • @warriorwisdomt8
    @warriorwisdomt8 24 дні тому

    For the people saying TASM didn’t get marketing, all 3 Spiderman movies got the same marketing …
    when MCU Spider man gets released and does way better than both TASM films what excuse will you give then??
    Tom Holland got more marking ??? 💀💀💀NOOOO
    people are not interested in Andrew as spider man because the films are not good

  • @ricardoman8018
    @ricardoman8018 24 дні тому

    No no that's you

  • @mikedaniel7195
    @mikedaniel7195 24 дні тому +3

    It does not matter what anybody says because those not true fans that think the Amazing Spider-Man 3 is a waste of time because it’s not and it should be made Andrew Garfield deserves the Amazing Spider-Man 3 that he never got and it’s not his fault it’s all because of Sony they are the ones that ruining the Spider-Man movies.

    • @Mr5ickness
      @Mr5ickness 24 дні тому

      The movie doesn't "deserve" to be made. That's like saying Morbius 2 or madame web 2 or whatever deserves to be made. It doesn't. And I'll say that I'm one of those people who say that Sam raimi's Spider-Man should be made because of what happened with sony and that bs on Spider-Man 3. But the Tasm films had bad writing and such with it. So think about it this way, Both Spider-Man 4 (Sam raimi) and Tasm 3 should be made. Not one over the other cause they both deserve to get their redemption for what happened. I'm not the biggest fan of the Tasm films but I still enjoy them for what it is.

    • @mikedaniel7195
      @mikedaniel7195 24 дні тому

      @@Mr5ickness I agree with everything you said and both Tobey and Andrew deserve their movies to be made Spider-Man 4 and the Amazing Spider-Man 3