5:29 as per your question, from what I see, I would highlight a lack of nuance, or sensitivity to the inherent possibility of property rights / attribution / context as possibly represented in digital media. Yes, once a digital network is in place there is a zero marginal cost to displaying a creative piece of art to an additional person. Meanwhile, and we know this is true in the human realm, just the right bit of content (and this is economically 'acknowledged' more clearly when it comes to business processes patents and so forth - but also similarly in terms of our own grappling with meaning, where the right 'information' It's likely to be relayed to you interpersonally) can make all the difference, can be extremely valuable. More or less the whole story of how digital economics has gone is that either everything has a paywall, or it's given without consequential acknowledgment towards the person who's provided it. The former economic model imports the (here) irrelevant physical goods metaphor, the latter is the advertising supported model, along with its perverse content incentives.
Gracefully handled audience questions ... I hate when a lot of the burden of finding solutions is placed on the artists themselves.
What is the reason Lewis hardly looks or pays attention to Robin when she is speaking?
Was thinking the exact same thing. He doesn't even look at her when talking to her
He’s a writer
Folder of Time
5:29 as per your question, from what I see, I would highlight a lack of nuance, or sensitivity to the inherent possibility of property rights / attribution / context as possibly represented in digital media.
Yes, once a digital network is in place there is a zero marginal cost to displaying a creative piece of art to an additional person.
Meanwhile, and we know this is true in the human realm, just the right bit of content (and this is economically 'acknowledged' more clearly when it comes to business processes patents and so forth - but also similarly in terms of our own grappling with meaning, where the right 'information' It's likely to be relayed to you interpersonally) can make all the difference, can be extremely valuable.
More or less the whole story of how digital economics has gone is that either everything has a paywall, or it's given without consequential acknowledgment towards the person who's provided it. The former economic model imports the (here) irrelevant physical goods metaphor, the latter is the advertising supported model, along with its perverse content incentives.
LFG 🕊🕊🕊
Black elk speaks