"She's Not Going Down Without a Fight" | ElSherbini v Gohar | British Open 2024 | FINAL HIGHLIGHTS
Вставка
- Опубліковано 21 вер 2024
- Watch Squash LIVE and ON DEMAND on SQUASHTV
bit.ly/Subscrib...
Subscribe Today on UA-cam for all our updates
www.youtube.com...
Become a UA-cam member to get access to perks:
/ @squashtv
Website: psaworldtour.com
Facebook: / psaworldtour
Twitter: @SquashTV @PSAWorldTour
Instagram: @squash.tv @psaworldtour
TikTok: @squashtv
PSA Foundation: psafoundation.com
#Squash #PSAWorldTour
Watch highlights of every glass court match on UA-cam by becoming a channel member 👉 bit.ly/3Qp0RcJ
Shame the fifth game was a bit screwy officiating-wise because that was going to be an all-time classic. Gohar was playing like it was the last tournament of her life.
last call of no let is ridiculous
PSA refereeing strikes again, dead set stroke and once again goes to the player in the lead, I see better at Monday night in house comp.
Shocker last call
You can't call a let when you're at the ball and you've gone through the interference
@@Moose92411 When the interference is just prior and pushes your body in such a way that a reasonable swing is no longer possible, you absolutely have the right to ask for a let, especially when your opponent did not make every effort (or even minimal effort) to clear. The most important thing is always the fair outcome of a point. Sherbini was on the ball, she actually had an advantage in the rally if allowed to reach the ball without obstruction, and Gohar's clearance was not 'every effort" and no doubt made it impossible for Sherbini to have a fair hit at the ball. Calling that "no let" just re-inforces player's instincts to not go out of their way to fully clear because they benefit from it.
Terrible no let call on the final point. ElShrebini was clearly knocked off her forward movement to strike the ball.
I'm now convinced that the video referees have agreed to almost always agree with the central ref. That final decision is an absolute shocker. No Let? It's a stroke all day long. Gohar stands square and shuts off the line to the ball.
Look at the last replay. That looks like a winning shot. It was glued to the wall. The first question to ask in let decisions is if the person asking for the let could have gotten the ball had there been no interference.
@@ewallt and? Could they?
@@ewallt @chrispowell8043 If you try to hit the ball moving the racket, as she did, you cannot claim for a let. She should have refrained herself from trying to hit the ball and she could have gotten a stroke.
@@ewallt It was definitely a LET at least. It's true that the ball was a glued, but without the interference she could have gotten to it beforehand and the interference was significant. This decision was completely wrong. Having said that there was no chance to overturn the match anyway.
@@Luisdefunes1 She didn't move the racket and wasn't near the ball, blocked by Gohar.
Watched the last game in full and surprised commentators didn’t comment more on how bad the refereeing was. Men’s final Jason Foster was fantastic, maybe 2-3 missed calls ENTIRE match! The last game in women’s final virtually every decision was wrong with 0 consistency from previous games. This ref, whoever she is, is awful in almost every match I see of her. Just glad they didn’t put her in the important men’s matches during British open.
Not a huge Gohar fan but these highlights suggested a decent amount of variation in her game which was good - especially taking it in short rather than just harder drives to the back. Good on her.
Here's part of a comment I made to someone else who was saying that different people can interpret the rules differently...
"What I've done is explain the related rule, and based on what the rule states, why the call was a poor call.
Gohar bounced (this is a hindrance in squash) ElSherbini off her movement line to the ball.
The video clearly shows this.
So now it becomes a matter of judgment regarding how much of an interference this hindrance (being bounced off her movement line) was.
1... It can be considered negligible interference, at which point it is not a consideration impacting the ref call.
2... It can be considered significant interference, at which point it is considered as impacting the ref call.
3... It can be considered an obstruction, at which point it is considered as the primary influence on the ref's call.
4... It can be considered a deliberate obstruction, at which point it is considered as something that both influences the ref's call and any additional warning/penalty the ref deems fit to apply.
If you look at the play sequence 8:32-35 you'll see that Gohar, after playing her drop (which was not a good drop as it came back into the court a few feet and bounced high) immediately stepped back directly into ElSherbini's line to the ball.
Gohar should have stepped to her left, not backward... This alone is cause for an immediate let call as her doing so immediately obstructed ElSherbini from having unhindered direct access to the ball, as well as space to complete a swing at the ball (as per related rule).
After a player has hit their shot, they should not make a move that becomes a hindrance/obstruction to their opponent who is now the hitter.
And this happened before ElSherbini was even in a position to attempt a shot.
Seriously, go take a look at it... Gohar stepping back into ElSherbini's line is clear as day.
Additionally... The non-hitter should not influence (Gohar) - by their movement - where and when the hitter (ElSherbini) can hit the ball.
If you look closely at the movement of the ball you will see that it is quite a distance off the side wall, and Gohar's backward movement hindered ElSherbini from going to take her shot earlier when the ball was not close to or against the wall.
Finally... There is substantial physical contact between the hips of both players just before ElSherbini would have made her shot.
If ElSherbini had deliberately caused this contact then it would be against her... But she didn't, it was Gohar's backward movement that caused the contact... As ElSherbini should have had a clear line to the ball.
Ask yourself... Why didn't Gohar move away from the line of the ball, which would have been to her left?
Having played competitive squash for years, I can suggest that Gohar didn't properly clear because doing so would have given ElSherbini the room to take the ball earlier, and in space (not close to the wall), which would have left Gohar in an awkward position, should ElSherbini have driven the ball either down the line. Gohar, had she moved to her left to clear the line to the ball, would have been in a poor position to recover a line drive by ElSherbini.
But what I think may have been Gohar's reason should not come into my consideration as a ref... Everything about this play clearly leans toward a let call at best against Gohar... And possibly even a stroke against her because of her poor movement backward, which caused the contact between the hips of both players that forced ElSherbini off her line.
Now the commentator suggested that ElSherbini looked to have gone through the interference, but anyone who plays the game at a competitive level knows that it is pretty much impossible to stop your intended movement on a dime... And if you look at ElSherbini's racquet preparation it is obvious that she had already decided not to execute a shot, but instead stop and ask for a let."
Hope the above helps.
Gohar is a very aggresive strong player for the entire Tour. I think a lot of players are scared playing her. Her hits are so hard and strong and her fitness is unbelievable. She will stays at the top for some time, I wish she can be a little humble just like Nicol David, Liz Irving or Heather
Great match, well done to both players
No Let. Seriously.
get your refereeing in order PSA - this is so embarrassing on this level - it does not bode well for Squash
a wonderful match ruined by not so wonderful decisions and certain dodgy movements + blocking not being penalised
The Refereeing is just awful!!!!
Really??? I can't agree with the calls of referee.. Why Gohar always take the benefit..?
The Terminator was just stronger physically & was pouncing on every shot? I like Sherbini for her elegant play, but Gohar was very determined 👍👍🙏🙏
It looks like the referee was Andrea Santamaria. Shame on her for the awful refereeing performance.
Sherbini should have played it at the end. She reached the ball, played though, then asked.
❤🇪🇬🇪🇬🇪🇬❤️
Sherbini is not attacking much. Hard to win. Only when she got the knife above her head then she attacked those 2 sets
Gohar should have been a soccer player. She loves to kick that glass 1:22
Terrible final decision...what a travesty..
Would like to see the last set in full, looks like there was some “gamesmanship” on gohar’s part. Sherbini is your quiet achiever, she only flags something when it’s without doubt in her mind but you can trust her when she does it that there’s some being used by gohar.
oh I watched the last game in full. It was horrific, unfortunately completely one sided missed calls against Sherbini. 4 or 5 clear missed calls that would’ve have made the game very close and very different. I forget this woman’s name who was refereeing but she is always bad, but last game with the video ref she was genuinely awful.
Anyone else getting bored how faceless, unaccountable video referees are ruining many sports with ridiculous decisions these days?
Shameful end decision!
What ! ? No let, nonsense decision
Got to say a great match and well done Nouran Gohar a good win.
However the ridiculous no let at the end was just pathetic. Sack idiot referees who make really bad decisions like that, it was a traffic issue and could have been a stroke to Sherbini.
They've been pushing them to play the ball for a while now. I would have given a let as it was right on the wall but still interference. But guess it's the way there reffing these days.
goes through interference, gets to striking distance of ball then decides to ask for a let because its to tight. People saying stroke are crazy. It was 10-4 anyway doesnt really matter.
Completely wrong assessment of what happened... Try and learn the rules of squash so not to make ridiculous comments.
@@aboveandbeyond9844 rules in sports and how referees choose to interpret and implement them are 2 completely different things. You should go be a psa ref with all your opinions and moaning haha
@@kiwikiwi223... Over forty years playing squash, both socially and competitively... And have refereed national-level matches.
If you can overcome your childishness, try and grasp this...
Rules of sport are there for guidance and application... Not dismissal based on personal interpretation... Whether by a player or ref.
This is why both players and refs are trained in the rules of the game... And the interpretation of these rules comes from experience.
Now... Hopefully, you will one day try and conduct yourself in a more mature manner.
Or not... And just continue in the abject darkness of your ignorance.
@aboveandbeyond9844 you still haven't explained why it was a no let haha
@@kiwikiwi223... Again, you've made another stupid comment.
I wasn't the ref... And I'm not a mind reader.
What I've done is explain the related rule, and based on what the rule states, why the call was a poor call.
But to try and help your "...haha..." brain... Let me try again...
Gohar bounced (this is a hindrance in squash) ElSherbini off her movement line to the ball.
The video clearly shows this.
So now it becomes a matter of judgment regarding how much of an interference this hindrance (being bounced off her movement line) was.
1... It can be considered negligible interference, at which point it is not a consideration impacting the ref call.
2... It can be considered significant interference, at which point it is considered as impacting the ref call.
3... It can be considered an obstruction, at which point it is considered as the primary influence on the ref's call.
4... It can be considered a deliberate obstruction, at which point it is considered as something that both influences the ref's call and any additional warning/penalty the ref deems fit to apply.
If you look at the play sequence 8:32-35 you'll see that Gohar, after playing her drop (which was not a good drop as it came back into the court a few feet and bounced high) immediately stepped back directly into ElSherbini's line to the ball.
Gohar should have stepped to her left, not backward... This alone is cause for an immediate let call as her doing so immediately obstructed ElSherbini from having unhindered direct access to the ball, as well as space to complete a swing at the ball.
After a player has hit their shot, they should not make a move that becomes a hindrance/obstruction to their opponent who is now the hitter.
And this happened before ElSherbini was even in a position to attempt a shot.
Seriously, go take a look at it... Gohar stepping back into ElSherbini's line is clear as day.
Additionally... The non-hitter should not influence - by their movement - where and when the hitter can hit the ball.
If you look closely at the movement of the ball you will see that it is quite a distance off the side wall, and Gohar's backward movement hindered ElSherbini from going to take her shot earlier when the ball was not close to or against the wall.
Finally... There is substantial physical contact between the hips of both players just before ElSherbini would have made her shot.
If ElSherbini had deliberately caused this contact then it would be against her... But she didn't, it was Gohar's backward movement that caused the contact... As ElSherbini should have had a clear line to the ball.
Ask yourself... Why didn't Gohar move away from the line of the ball, which would have been to her left?
Having played competitive squash for years, I can suggest that Gohar didn't properly clear because doing so would have given ElSherbini the room to take the ball earlier, which would have left Gohar in an awkward position, should ElSherbini have driven the ball either down the line or cross court.
But what I think may have been Gohar's reason does not come into my consideration as a ref... Everything about this play clearly leans toward a let call at best against Gohar... And possibly even a stroke against her because of her poor movement backward.
Now the commentator suggested that ElSherbini looked to have gone through the interference, but anyone who plays the game at a competitive level knows that it is pretty much impossible to stop your intended movement on a dime... And if you look at ElSherbini's racquet preparation it is obvious that she had already decided not to execute a shot, but instead stop and ask for a let.
Anyway... Hope that makes my take clear to you... And that perhaps you will reconsider your childish trolling with silliness like "...moaning...".
Or not... Being mature is requires some effort, and some people are just too lazy to make the effort.
Noran the Queen of unfair play, The Blocker.
I think refereeing must improve in this level they must learn where they can give let and stroke and world squash must watch all rules even at death of the game its all on referee if she or he had a fight with his or her love one then sry u loose the game .....😂😂
I was there. Sherbini had the balance of calls in her favour for most of the match and works the ref as much as Gohar. The last one is wrong for me but irrelevant at 10-4.
Brilliant game. Sherbini the master sqiash player, what a talent, but Gohar just too powerful an athlete.
It is not a ref's prerogative to assume a score of 10-4 makes a proper rules decision irrelevant.
No Let, play the ball. I'm sure the players know that the bias is towards playing the ball if you can.
There are rules for a reason... The ref didn't follow the rules.
Hard luck to queen Noor El shirbini ♥️♥️♥️
Dirty
❤🇪🇬🇪🇬🇪🇬❤️
❤🇪🇬🇪🇬🇪🇬❤️