Literally. The greatest game in the world! "Now every single move is a mistake and this game should have been played completely different from what a actually happened."
You're one of the few that can actually explain in a proper cadence. So many great and well known masters stream and publish videos thinking because they can play the game they can teach. But just rushing through literal sections of a game just because it's super clear and simple to you as a grandmaster doesn't help anybody else. Thanks, please keep it up!
I'm studying this match today for the first time and man, it was awesome. I'm also new to this channel and I think this is your best video model: the background and board colors, the room lighting, your looking and the way you talk. I think you should always follow this receipt.
Thank you for breaking this game down move by move. I was playing a chess puzzle of this exact match from 5 moves until checkmate and I was going crazy trying to figure out the first move. Once I got that out of the way I was able to figure out the rest but that pawn to e5 is crucial! Thanks again.
Wow, such a cool case study. I don’t think I realized just how impressive this was until I realized just how much more material black had by the end of the game
This. What is often overlooked about this game is that while Anderssen indeed sacrificed all but white's three minor pieces that were directly involved in the checkmate, he did so while capturing only three of black's pawns, leaving all of black's major & minor pieces on the board. Nonetheless, black is helpless to defend against the attack!
Recently saw this game for the first time, now I get it, so creative and out of the box. The pawn blocking the queen so many moves later talk about thinking ahead wow.
I'm new to the game can I ask a question why the bishop are so strong? Isn't the king could just capture the bishop whenever the bishop captured the f7 pawn??
Is there a reason black couldn't take pawn to g4 by en passant? Might not be a good line but I checked out this video specifically hoping to have that explained.
What it really shows is that weak play against an attack allows you to drop a lot of material and still win. Today, any 2000+ player would have defended better.
@@andrewqi6695 Yes, exactly, they didn't even have an idea of proper defense till Steinitz, who wouldn't come to prominence for about 3 more decades. They didn't even understand the value of pieces, so they made so they often very poor exchanges, and positionally they blundered regularly without even knowing it.
OMG ITS THE GREATEST GAME EVER PLAYED (finds a problem with every move)
Literally. The greatest game in the world! "Now every single move is a mistake and this game should have been played completely different from what a actually happened."
You're one of the few that can actually explain in a proper cadence. So many great and well known masters stream and publish videos thinking because they can play the game they can teach. But just rushing through literal sections of a game just because it's super clear and simple to you as a grandmaster doesn't help anybody else. Thanks, please keep it up!
I'm studying this match today for the first time and man, it was awesome. I'm also new to this channel and I think this is your best video model: the background and board colors, the room lighting, your looking and the way you talk. I think you should always follow this receipt.
Thank you Sam! Great stuff.
Thank you so much, I've been struggling to get better, this is what people need frfr
Thank you for breaking this game down move by move. I was playing a chess puzzle of this exact match from 5 moves until checkmate and I was going crazy trying to figure out the first move. Once I got that out of the way I was able to figure out the rest but that pawn to e5 is crucial! Thanks again.
Wow, such a cool case study. I don’t think I realized just how impressive this was until I realized just how much more material black had by the end of the game
This. What is often overlooked about this game is that while Anderssen indeed sacrificed all but white's three minor pieces that were directly involved in the checkmate, he did so while capturing only three of black's pawns, leaving all of black's major & minor pieces on the board. Nonetheless, black is helpless to defend against the attack!
it's beautiful actually
this series is awesome. Just watched bobby fischers episode. so fun!
Recently saw this game for the first time, now I get it, so creative and out of the box. The pawn blocking the queen so many moves later talk about thinking ahead wow.
Absolutely beautiful. New to the channel and I'm here to stay
Very nicely explained
sensational greatly explained
Holy Bagration Batman! That was a great game.
Great!
hello sir. which app do you use?
thanku werry much
Hi Sam, your video made me appreciate this game and fall in love with it..
I'm new to the game can I ask a question why the bishop are so strong? Isn't the king could just capture the bishop whenever the bishop captured the f7 pawn??
@@sam_copelandsorry for the confusion, I mean the white light square bishop at the beginning why black need to sacrifice it's pawn 2:57
Make a video like this about the gold coins game
Why doesn't black capture the rook on a1 first, giving check, instead of taking the rook on g1 with his bishop??
Black would have won that way according to the commentary
entertaining!!
Informed decisions.
Is there a reason black couldn't take pawn to g4 by en passant? Might not be a good line but I checked out this video specifically hoping to have that explained.
It discovers the black queen on g5
@@arnaumoratinos5605 Ah, thank you! Should be obvious; instead i made it obvious that i suck at chess!
Love this game... It teaches that initiative is better than any positional consideration...
What it really shows is that weak play against an attack allows you to drop a lot of material and still win. Today, any 2000+ player would have defended better.
@@dbrock1553 lol this was the 1850's
@@andrewqi6695 Yes, exactly, they didn't even have an idea of proper defense till Steinitz, who wouldn't come to prominence for about 3 more decades. They didn't even understand the value of pieces, so they made so they often very poor exchanges, and positionally they blundered regularly without even knowing it.
Hot wings guy?
🙏🙏🙏💖💖💖
After 19. Qb2 It is not a win for black. It is a draw with correct play.
Actually it's a win for White with correct play.