🤍 Free Checklist for Video Editors: renderqueue.store/b/freechecklis 💜 Want to buy MY PRODUCTS? Go here: renderqueue.store/ 💛 Want to GROW as a video editor? Go here: www.skool.com/render-zone-9077/about
just a suggestion bro , don't move your screen too much like in this video , there are so many transitions ,showing keyframes ,graph editor icon etc etc. it's kind of annoying and distracting but the video is great ! thanks bud love your tuts
I try to show the viewer where to look. A newcomer to the program will simply be confused about what to do and where to look. With these camera movements, I try to convey information better. Thanks for your feedback
Looks very tidious to be honest, camera gives more options like depth of field also you can use multiple camers for different angles if needed. And if you undestand how it works is very easy and fast to use. Also the way you do it can be cool for simple stuff, yet you still should first make 3D layers then precompose and then do 3D layer of that precompe and then apply Continuously Rasterize, othewise whenever you zoomin you lose quality.
Thank you, I was wondering why he did that at first cause it confused me that he comp’d then did 3d. I didn’t even realize you could rasterize either, so thank you again 🙏🏼
Why it is without using the camera? Is it bad to use it or something? it seems that those both methods work similar and create the same effect so why not to use it?
Doing it the way I showed in the video and using a camera are not the same thing, and the effect will be different. With a 3D camera, you move in 3D space. With my method, I simply move to the desired place in my composition because my composition is a 3D object. In fact, my method is simpler because your camera is not 3D, only your composition is in 3D. If you use a camera, then all your objects are in 3D, and I don't see the point in using a camera unless you really need to animate it in 3D space to make it rotate 360 degrees and use depth of field to separate objects from each other. In short, my method is very easy to create a bit of 3D. A 3D camera makes sense to use if you really need a 3D space to shoot in, literally like in real life. It may not be clear to you, but you don't need to bother with a 3D camera.
🤍 Free Checklist for Video Editors: renderqueue.store/b/freechecklis
💜 Want to buy MY PRODUCTS? Go here: renderqueue.store/
💛 Want to GROW as a video editor? Go here: www.skool.com/render-zone-9077/about
just a suggestion bro , don't move your screen too much like in this video , there are so many transitions ,showing keyframes ,graph editor icon etc etc. it's kind of annoying and distracting but the video is great ! thanks bud love your tuts
I try to show the viewer where to look. A newcomer to the program will simply be confused about what to do and where to look. With these camera movements, I try to convey information better. Thanks for your feedback
+1
@@theplotheadmedia thank u)
This is what it's called suffering from success.
@@MrDecom-qj5ru wdum?
Bro's video's don't contain 3d camera movement, bro's videos are 3d camera movements. Amazing tutorial, learnt a new way to create this effect
Cool, thanks
@@Render_Q :)
such a cool way of doing tutorials. straight to the point man, keep em coming
Thank you
Looks very tidious to be honest, camera gives more options like depth of field also you can use multiple camers for different angles if needed. And if you undestand how it works is very easy and fast to use. Also the way you do it can be cool for simple stuff, yet you still should first make 3D layers then precompose and then do 3D layer of that precompe and then apply Continuously Rasterize, othewise whenever you zoomin you lose quality.
Thank you, I was wondering why he did that at first cause it confused me that he comp’d then did 3d. I didn’t even realize you could rasterize either, so thank you again 🙏🏼
u're right. that's easy way to achieve a little bit 3d effect
Amazing! Thanks.
I'm glad to read that🙂
thats superb
thank you!
This is awesome tutorial. I like this how short it is and how much i learn. Thank you 🙏
You're very welcome!
Thank you. Please make a video on top must have AE plugins!
I already have similar video
Great video thank you!
Thank u too
Thank you for your help ❤
You're welcome
Well, was this video helpful?
def
no, better make a power point tutorial
What? Why? 🧐
@@Render_Q lol
too much movement for a tutorial. not helping
W way of Showing Tutorial
thx
Nice
Thanks
Can you do it in Premiere Pro?
I don't know how
in premiere pro?
what in pp?
@@Render_Q can we do the same smooth camera movements in pp?
I think that no, cuz of in premiere pro there's no 3d layers
@@Render_Q ok thanks👍
where can I get that background?
Make it manually
Which graph you animate speed graph or value graph?🤔
speed
What font do you use for the subtitles at the beginning?
bahnshift bold
yo how to do this effect when u put the camera pic and the after effect logo
?? please answer
Tell me timing in the video
@@Render_Q right in the begining after 3 sec
@@oriAE camera is a 3d, after effects logo - just animated
@@Render_Q CAN U TELLO ME what to search to got tutorial ?
@@oriAE idk what u wanna make. tell me exactly i wanna 3d object or i wanna...
Can i not do this things in adope prime pro ?
Most likely no. I don't know if there are 3D layers there
Why it is without using the camera? Is it bad to use it or something? it seems that those both methods work similar and create the same effect so why not to use it?
Doing it the way I showed in the video and using a camera are not the same thing, and the effect will be different. With a 3D camera, you move in 3D space. With my method, I simply move to the desired place in my composition because my composition is a 3D object. In fact, my method is simpler because your camera is not 3D, only your composition is in 3D. If you use a camera, then all your objects are in 3D, and I don't see the point in using a camera unless you really need to animate it in 3D space to make it rotate 360 degrees and use depth of field to separate objects from each other. In short, my method is very easy to create a bit of 3D. A 3D camera makes sense to use if you really need a 3D space to shoot in, literally like in real life. It may not be clear to you, but you don't need to bother with a 3D camera.
Well explained my brother@@Render_Q
how you do apply blur in your videos?
Search Fast Lens Blur, add to adjustment layer and adjust the effect
@@Render_Q Do you mean "Fast Box" blur? I don't see "Fast Lens" blur in AE Effects.
@@nickjames5602 from boris fx
isnt it better to create a camera and link it with a null object and control it?
I do it this way and it’s easier for me to do it this way. Why make unnecessary movements?
o cara faz tutorial de "smooth" e nao usa nulo pqp
what?
@@Render_Q traduz ai seu bosta, portuguese please
write in English
not exactly what im looking for but great technique nevertheless...but the tutorial itself is bad, hurts my eye.
I understand, it can be too fast, but the last tutorials already slower
🤌
how the heck this is smoother, dont spread misinfos
smoother than what?
@@Render_Q this is the most basic animation method, not a single overlaping of keyframes happening
@@പാവംപാൽക്കാരൻപയ്യൻ i can't understand u, sorry