Am I Racist? REVIEW - Matt Walsh's New Film(?)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 26 лис 2024
- Spoilers: yes.
✔ SUPPORT ✔
▶Patreon: / jessiegender
▶PayPal: paypal.me/jess...
✔ OTHER PLATFORMS ✔
▶Main Channel: / lostrekkie
▶After Dark Channel: / @jessiegenderafterdark...
▶Twitch: / jessiegender
✔ SOCIAL MEDIA ✔
▶Instagram: /
▶Twitter: / jessiegender
▶Facebook: / jessie.gende...
✔ SHOP ✔
▶Book that I Helped Write: bit.ly/39EqtP4
✔ OTHER PROJECTS ✔
▶What the Frell podcast w/Council of Geeks: councilofgeeks...
✔ CONTACT ✔
▶E-mail: jearl1892@gmail.com
▶Mail: Jessie Earl
PO BOX 85787
Seattle, WA 98145
Borat is a character based in Kazakhstani, that is a central Asian country, it's racist to assume his character as middle eastern because of his physical attributes. Shame on you.
Shame on the people that Borat interviewed, because a lot of them assumed that he was middle-eastern. Which, you know, what exactly what Sacha Baron Cohen was counting on.
Mirror universe Mat(hilda) Walsh released their latest film "What is a Racist?", following on the heels of the underground sensation, "Am I a Woman?"
Why couldn’t we get this time line? That sounds wonderful
Honestly, I would unironically watch the fuck out of those.
Matt Walsh: everyone's afraid to review my documentary
Also Matt Walsh: *copyright strikes anyone who reviews his documentary*
Everyone is afraid of having to listen to his voice for 2 hours more like
it’s particularly annoying on here because exploiting a false DMCA claim to censor criticism has been around since early yt; while at the same time yt has been shown recently to use uploads to train AI without notifying users
@@TheRogueCommand I think they're more scared of his 5head. If you measure from the top of his hairline down to the eyebrow, its the same distance as from his eyebrow down to his mouth. That's terrifying. I feel like he could psychically attack me with his massive ego through the screen.
It's also funny because the prefrontal cortex often has functions related to egotism and narcissistic behaviour, so it's actually a physiological indicator of egotism to have a huge forehead
@@amelioravictoriadionyssia3323 i would like to inform you you are not actually making a valid point by playing on his appearance, also do you have a source for the argument about the forehead and ego claim?
@@BrunottilegendeIt's helpful that he has a big forehead, bigger target
Borat is funny because he asks ridiculous questions to normal people. Matt Walsh is funny because he asks normal questions to ridiculous people.
Such as..?
@@dariocarraresi1823What is a Woman?
@@DanielEarth1 1) A bad-faith question asked by anti-trans activists - particularly Matt Walsh's fans - as an attempt to derail the conversation.
2) A gender identity typically associated with cultural beliefs about femininity.
3) A person who has adopted the homonymous gender identity.
4) A "documentary" produced by Matt Walsh, full of lies and demonization against trans people and pro-trans activists. For example, at one point Walsh asks a question, and then edits the footage to make it look like the interviewee just rambled on and on without answering. At another point, Walsh falsely accuses Alfred Kinsey of pedophilia.
minor nit... Kazakhstan (where Borat is supposedly from) is not "middle eastern".
I thought that too. I think he's supposed to be like a mix of different "foreign" stereotypes.
I don't remember what it's supposed to be, other than "post-Soviet" and of course "Kazakh". I think SBC chose that country for Borat exactly because Westerners know so little about it.
@@AdrianColley , exactly. The point was to make fun of Americans' ignorance, xenophobia, and provincialism.
@@AdrianColley its supposed to be a soviet block islamic nation lol. did you not get that from how he talks about women or jewish peopel?
you really think these white holier than thou saviors care for other cultures to be bothered to know?
"Review my movie! No, not like that! I meant uncritical praise!"
Review my movie, ill censor the reviews I don't like to make my garbage film appear better than it is.
He’d love Jeremy Jahns lol
I'm sure his audience would cancel and if he says anything positive about the movie so it goes both ways.
@KnightOfNewColu for giving an honest review? Everyone going into this with bias
Except they're too scared to review it HAHA
a movie that could be 2 seconds
The answer to Walsh's question: Yes!
What he hell is the DEI industry?
Two seconds is a whole 2000 milliseconds. One can say yes is less that one, if you're fast enough. Or if you want to be fancy as add a fuck in the front.
@@lkeke35 Diversity Equality Inclusivity?
Thats 1 second more than how much Matt lasts in bed.
@@kaoko111 He has like 12 kids, so I guess he had some action.
Um, doesn't anybody think its odd that he's 'going undercover' and yet with somebody standing there filming the thing. Don't people realize you can hire actors to pretend they aren't acting?
Yes, but actors are professional fakers, while Wet Mulch fancies himself a crusader for truth and charismatic media personality. 🤣
He told them he was making a documentary, which he was, and they jumped at the chance to be filmed making fools of themselves.
"sounds like cope"
Yes, yes it does.
"but this time it's true"
That just sounds even more like cope!
He's talking like the Snyderverse fans...
"What is a woman?"
"Am I a racist?"
What's the rhetorical question going to be for the title of his next film?
"Is climate change really real? " , "What iS real mAn ?", "Am i an ass ? So many dumb possibilities with this guy XD
@@00noenoah maybe "Am I homophobic" ?
"is book burning bad?"
Does jet fuel melt steel beams?
Well, what IS a woman?
Would you consider two people disparaging a group of other people based solely on their race being different, would you call that racism?
Small point but relevant to discussions on race: Kazakhstan is actually the most northern central Asian republic, just south of Russia. It’s a former Soviet republic with a history that’s more Eurasian than middle eastern, except for the influence of Islam
Truth is, Jeremy Jahns gave what is in my opinion a real unbiased review of the film. It’s hard to imagine this review as unbiased when you say, in response to Walsh manipulating a race grifter to give $30 to a black person as reparations, that it’s ignoring the wider context of how reparations is a step toward building solutions to racism in this country. It’s not trying to build a context for this, it’s trying to make fun of a race grifter. Borat didn’t meet with a bunch of Trump supporters to try mend the divisiveness of the country through ideals, or even set the tone or basis for that, he just wanted to mock their idiocy.
Another commenter said it best; is your criticism that Walsh didn’t take these race grifters seriously enough? Imagine a conservative reviewing Borat and saying “Borat was insincere when he spoke with the Trump supporters, and didn’t address the key issues that Trump supporters have; rather he just found the stupidest ones and mocked them by giving them an open mic.” That conservative would be correct, but woefully ignorant to the idea of what constitutes a satirical comedy. A stark difference between the two is that the Trump supporters Borat made fun of were in positions of low-information ideologues, while the race grifters Walsh made fun of were in positions of power.
Ah yes, Walsh manipulated DiAngelo by insisting and insisting until he made everyone in the room uncomfortable - including Walsh's black colleague. Eventually DiAngelo had to ask the guy if he was okay with getting 30$ just to make Walsh stop. Wow, so revealing. Such idiocy. I'm impressed - did I mention how impressed I am?
@@dariocarraresi1823 How do you know Walsh's colleague was uncomfortable? He seemed pretty down with it. As a producer on the film, he is in on the joke. Or maybe you prefer to do black folks' thinking for them? Do you want to inform him that he was uncomfortable? Because he didn't seem to know it.
@@therovinghome6390 The scene was edited in a pretty weird way to obfuscate things, however DiAngelo released a statement explaining what really happened during that scene. Among other things, DiAngelo outright told Walsh that his idea of "reparations" was weird (this part was kept in the movie) because it's about the government addressing a systemic issue caused by its own segregation policies, not about individual white people paying individual black people (this part was cut out). DiAngelo also pointed out that Walsh kept making everyone uncomfortable.
When Walsh read the statement during an interview, his only objection was about DiAngelo's comment on Walsh's wig; for everything else, he had no objection to DiAngelo's version.
@@dariocarraresi1823 I read her statement. You definitely did not watch the movie, or you would not have quoted her condescending take (which is generally how she treats people of color) on the producer’s response.
@@Tejroe how can you think anyone in this video other than Matt Walsh has power? Like the guy's a prick but painting him as some kind of underdog is just blatantly facetious
I'm so baffled by the fact that TDW has millions and millions of dollars, but they won't buy Matthew a second wig.
🤣🤣 seriously
He’s meant to wear a cheap wig to make fun of you leftist snowflakes who put boobs on men’s bodies.. he’s showing how fake extras don’t make you something else. Wig = sarcasm on dummies
Is that all you've got, lo ser? 😂😂
That's how they make money: make crap as cheaply as possible on the budget their billionaire sugar daddy gives them
I think that's the thing, he thinks he doesn't NEED a second wig. I think he thinks he doesn't need one AND that it's an epic iconic costume just like Borat that is universally beloved by all audiences.
"I'm going to review the film separate from how i personally feel about Matt Walsh"
Spends the entire video talking about personal feelings about Matt Walsh and his viewerbase....
I enjoyed the movie.
Yeah and it’s not even a movie the only actor in that film was Matt Walsh. All the other people had to do was talk and share their opinions ☠️. And it was entertaining. And WILD.
I'm mad they took your other video down. Definitely gonna watch the reupload. Love your work as always, Jessie. You're the best
They took down Jessie’s re-upload as well. So sad
My review: She's actually quite awful. She heart-reacts all the oh-so-clever comments about how the movie could be two seconds long. Not exactly the reactions of someone who reviewed the film in good faith or fairness, is it?
Ah, fuck it. You'll all ignore that and move on to singing her praises. Why do I bother?
@@Ultranothinguhm, you do see the video you’re replying to, no? How can you say she’s not reviewing in good faith while quite literally commenting on a good faith video review lol not to mention the 4hr video she made critiquing What Is A Woman…if only the DW didn’t sensor everything criticizing them. Not very free speech of them
@@karahampton1285 well, imagine that a four hour review of a movie that's an hour and a half long contains enough copywritten material that a person could feasibly reduce said review down to a point where they no longer have to buy a ticket to said film. The answer is right there in your own comment, dude.
But no, this wasn't a video made in good faith. It's completely one-sided and biased, and the SOUL of the review is in the reviewer's CLEAR presumptions and established feelings toward the filmmaker, his politics, etc.
The worst part is that I know you know it's actually true. It's too obviously true that any person who arises in the morning of their own volition and can feed and clothe themselves can plainly glean the truth of it. We ALL know that this person didn't like the film before they even saw it, and created the review to fit. Can we all start being honest with each other? Please?
@@Ultranothing Damn you sure like to write essays and fellate Map Walsh. Is this your burner account Matthew? Lmao 😂😂😂
Jessie, i love all your content and reviews- they always show me things in a different angle and are informative in the best possible way.
That being said, please don't make a long-form video about this movie. To me that feels like playing into Walsh's hand.
This short analysis is concise and gives insight without giving a lot of energy to the Walshes of the world, you can leave it at that.
Looking forward to watching everything else you make (that isn't a star trek spoiler for this slow watcher 😅)
❤
Agree. I'd just say, "No Matt, you talk like a N@zi and look like a hipster."
And then go back to watching Crayon Shin-chan, which is one of those scary satanic anime that Matt hates.
"No one ever reviews my very good movie!"
*Jessie Gender, Dead Domain, and Some More News BARGE into the chat, followed by half of leftTube*
Seriously though, that epic 4-hour evisceration deserves a rewatch or fifteen. My 72yo trans parent loved it, too! 💛
Seriously, this is, like, the third review I’ve watched of this movie that “critics are afraid to review.” I’ve seen more reviews of this movie than Deadpool and Wolverine.
@@briham86im pretty sure he means from Mainstream film critics & major networks or show. We all know Mainstream media only pushes far left narrative on racism, sexism, etc and doesnt allow any objection to their false narrative
@briham86 its up to 10 reviews now on Rotten Tomatoes. 80% critic score and 98% audience score.
@@briham86 Are you really suggesting it's about what you, a single person has watched and not about the lack of reviews on Rotten Tomatoes while the movie was in the top 5 most viewed?
@@suckieduckie top 5 most viewed in a year where Hollywood has dropped the ball for advertising anything
I'm a long-haired guy who's more progressive than Matt could understand (not a difficult bar to clear), but from my experience, I don't get how his wig makes for a liberal stereotype. They did the same in Mr. Birchum, I think it's something about "hipsters" from 15 years ago?
All of their "comedy" is about 10-20 years outdated
I guess he's going for "creepy yogi"? I dunno, his creepiness is so inherent to his base self that it's very difficult to spin into a satirical trait
He puts on the wig but keeps the swag-less untrimmed patriarchal bushy beard. Make it make sense MW!
he's still into that "hippies have long hair" mindset, probably.
Why is a beard patriarchal? As a Sikh we are not allowed to remove our hair for religious reasons and our religion promotes equality so...?@moustik31
The newest installment in Matt Walsh's neverending quest for a gender affirming haircut.
One of the things that irritates me the most about this movie is that he really thought just putting on a wig the same color as his actual hair but long and tied back would make him into some kind of iconic sjw liberal Borat character but like he just looks like Matt Walsh with long hair
Bro calm down it ain’t that deep. 💀
@@Peterson1451??? Saying Matt Walsh didn't put in any effort to change his appearance is deep? 😂
@@UrOnTheWrongSide no it’s that he gets so pissed off about it. Like bruh that was the point, he wasn’t changing his appearance to much due to it being a satire movie.
@@Peterson1451 You mean how they said they were irritated that he thought he looked any different? Well, he did look stupid, It's not that deep. Lol Move on.
@@UrOnTheWrongSide ok?
The difference between Borat and Matt Walsh is that Borat asks ridiculous questions to normal people. Matt Walsh asks normal questions to ridiculous people.
Walsh also waffles over nothing and edits the crab out of the footage, but you clearly didn't watch the review so you didn't know.
@@dariocarraresi1823 I watched. Trust me 🤮
@@dariocarraresi1823 I doubt you watched the movie. Specifically, what was edited to take something out of context ? When Robin Diangelo paid reparations, how was that edited to make her look bad ?
@@toneloc7910 First of all, the entire interiew before the "pay reparations" bits is edited to the point of making DiAngelo sound incoherent and incomprehensible.
Then there's the part about reparations. Here's what was cut out from that part:
>Walsh repeatedly insisting, over and over, that DiAngelo should give money to Walsh's black colleague. It got to the point that he was making everyone uncomfortable.
>DiAngelo pointing out, multiple times, that reparations don't work that way.
>DiAngelo saying that she isn't an expert on reparations, and suggesting various other academics and sources that Walsh could consult.
>DiAngelo asking the black guy if he was okay with receiving money (because she genuinely thought that Walsh prepared the whole "reparations" stunt without asking the guy first).
@@dariocarraresi1823 She IS incoherent and incomprehensible. She isn't an expert on reparations ? That is laughable. Progressives are calling for them all the time. If she didn't want to pay reparations, she didn't have to.
Can anyone tell me where to find this movie? I can’t find it on Google or UA-cam any help would be greatly appreciated
On DailyWire Plus.
I don’t like Walsh at all, I laughed my ass off. The people he interviewed are absolutely nuts. All you really have to do is let them talk and the movie makes itself.
You didn't watch the review. And you probably believe more of Walsh's claims like "Kinsey molested infants" or "they are using chemical castration drugs on trans kids".
@@dariocarraresi1823yeah people seem to think these people are "crazy" when Matt Walsh and his team are in charge of editing
@@Cruzeoc101 if that's what you think I wrote then please practice your reading comprehension for your own good
@@Syv_ a lack of source footage doesn't make the edit more trustworthy
@@Cruzeoc101 The point I'm making is Matt Walsh and his team in charge of editing means they can decide what footage goes and what doesn't so it's easy to make the interviewed people look "crazy"
Jessie, I just want to say, before watching this video, that I really appreciate the sub-20 min format.
Okay -- let's go girl!
What did you think of the race for dinner scene? I think it's very sad that white people pay to get spoken down to.
I think it's sad when people think being confronted with facts is getting "spoken down to".
@@Shampyon "All of my political opponents are nazis and this crap country where I get paid for talking crap about white people whilst drinking champagne is not worth saving"
That's not speaking down to someone?
So.... more DEI training?
@@Shampyon So you'd pay to be spoken down to by a woman who identified as being white thinking they'd have a better life? That's funny.
@@Shampyon What facts?
You missed the point entirely, min 8:57 the point is that DEI instructors are grifters by charging “30k” for a presentation and sit around on chairs or 5K for a dinner to be told that there is no fix. That is the point of the movie another DEI instructor was charging 10k+ and it was a whiteboard presentation. Then he went online and got certified. The point of that is that he went through the training and proves that anyone can be a DEI expert as he mentions in the movie.
Then about the Borat of the right, I think that only applies to the last scene were he pushes to see how far it can go.
And just another thing you claim that your video review had almost 1M views but the trailer has over 6M views and in the second week has grossed over 9M usd in the box office just to put things in to perspective.
Walsh was the one who charged 30k. He was the one who offered DiAngelo 10k-20k, unprompted. And every time he mentions a price tag, he never tells you if it's per person or per group.
Basically, Walsh makes sh!t up. Not to mention how much _he_ charges for _his_ speeches.
@@dariocarraresi1823 even if it is per group and he did not charge that I actually watched the movie he made 3k from people that enrolled in the DEI which technically he can because he has a certificate. And unprompted, she did those interviews, workshops she even mentioned that in the movie I guess it is just gaslighting time.
@@ignisproductions7791 No, I'm talking about one of the DEI workshops that appeared early on in the movie - the one who, according to Walsh, charged 30k. The Daily Wire staged that workshop. There's even a police report about it.
@@dariocarraresi1823 yes they staged all of them. Like the interview the race to dinner that is how they got the cameras in. Same as everyother movie like it that is how you have control of the film. What was not staged was the content.
I've been seeing commercials for the Sylvester Stallone vehicle - Tulsa King. And, maybe my eyes are deceiving me, but I could swear to God that they have hired Matt Walsh to play a character in season 2.
Oh no I hope you are not talking about the beautifully beareded and bespectacled bestest boy, Martin Star (of Freaks and Geeks fame, aka Peter Parker's teacher in the MCU spidey movies too).
@@moondog548 Maybe. I could be wrong. But whoever he was, in the commercial, he looks pretty similar to Matt Walsh in his stupid fucking wig. Lol.
I bet the cool Matt Walsh who also appears in the US version of Ghosts wishes he could change his name to disassociate himself from this chucklefuck but legally he can't.
@@moondog548 Oh my god they do look alike 😮
So Matt Walsh's big new idea is just "We have Borat at home." If I had expectations for the Daily Wire, I would be dissapointed.
I mean, come on. Jessie putting Sisko in the background was probably more racially sensitive than anything the Daily Wire could come up with.
Another movie made by people who failed at movie making
Fun fact, the word "sisko" is Finnish for sister :) no reason
The whole daily wire is a "we have ______at home" meme.
Steve shives looks like Matt Walsh I know that doesn't want to make shives jump off a cliff
Borat was a guy in disguise saying crazy things to normal people. This was abnormal people saying crazy things to a guy in disguise.
What is a woman was a classic😂
I first saw a poster for this when I was browsing for something coming up at my local Regals. I didn't recognize him at first because he wasn't the head of a grown-ass man on the body of a diapered infant.
I'm surprised you can identify what a man looks like.
I really hope you do end up doing something longer form on nebula/your main channel. If you have the mental energy to of course! I can't imagine what a four hour long video essay worth of MW footage would do to a person.
If you were in good faith trying to disguise Matt Walsh, so he could Borat about and people genuinely not recognise him, how would you do it?
To me, the answer is obvious, and it's not give him a wig and a ponytail... it would be to shave his beard and maybe hair off.
Without that beard he'd be immediately unrecognisable. The fact he didn't do this says to me this whole concept is a scam (of course) and he lacked the stones to commit to the bit.
But he succeeded so it makes zero sense to try to armchair quarterback a play that already worked.
@@forsythejones2130 I disagree, I think its perfectly okay to armchair quarterback a play if you are an ideologue with no grasp on reality because of your marxist echo chamber.
@@JesseCuoi Many such cases. 😄
One of the most hilarious scenes I’ve ever seen in a movie when he tricked her into giving him money. I couldn’t stop laughing
It's funny because DiAngelo kept trying to explain to Walsh that reparations don't work that way, but he didn't listen. He kept insisting and insisting until she gave up because he was making everyone - including the black guy she gave the money to - uncomfortable.
It's hilarious how Walsh thought that being a little whiny femaledog was a "gotcha".
Like, on the one hand, this is a comment to boost engagement to try and put this up the algo when people look up this video. On the other hand, I think the clear answer to the question of the video being reviewed, is that "His video is obviously what it is. So he does answer the question, unambiguously. Just not in the way the creator would hope."
Racist and proud. Way to go chief.
@@hanmoehtet He didn’t say anything racist. Are you proud of being a race baiter?
What do you think you accomplished? Maybe you should just open your widow and scream “RACIST!” at every person who walks by if you get off on making false claims…
Just curious. Are you a leftist or righty? Hard to tell from your comments.
Oh God I can't escape this damn movie ad. I love you, Jessie, but I'm watching this one on mute, I can't deal with another second of Matt Walsh's voice. (And the answer is yes, you are, Matt)
It's like gravel in a blender...but more boring.
Honestly valid xD
I think people playing clips of him should speed the clip up, not for copyright reasons but so his voice sounds less annoying. And that's coming from someone who doesn't like it when clips in videos are at X2 speed.
I loathe it! and Stephen Crowder's blaccent as well. awful men who are so miserable they need to bring everyone else down.
3:54 here the review starts and after that, zero clips with his voice are used
Wow! A review of the movie! By an actual critic! It’s almost like Matt enjoys being told he is not a competent actor, director, producer, documentarian, whatever he wants to be called. Love you Jessie. I enjoy that you’re able to put your personal opinions aside and genuinely review conservative media from a technical standpoint. Thinking about the earnest and not chronically online folks who might go to see this movie is a very appreciated viewpoint.
Spoilers for anyone who doesn’t know who MW and DW are: yes, Matt is a racist.
By what actual critic?
@@arjay9745 Jessie. She is an approved critic for Rotten Tomatoes. You can disagree with her opinions, but that doesn’t take away her place on the critics list. And while normally I wouldn’t respond to obvious rage bait, I’m happy to give the video some additional engagement.
@@goofballjar It's not that I disagree with Jesse's opinions. It's that this was a beginning-to-end, non-substantive ad hominem fest on Jesse's part. When this channel does an actual review, bringing up actual points from specific in-film contexts, then, and only then, I will accept the self-designation of 'reviewer'.
We must’ve watched different videos, because she references the film throughout. But again, thank you for responding and continuing to give Jessie additional engagement.
"The critics aren't reviewing it because it's too good. Sounds like some grade A hardcore cope."
There has never been a movie so good that critics won't review it. There has never been more cope than this denial.
@@JohnBainbridge0 hello there John
@@PatrickWDunne Ahoy!
Copium overdose.
It's like he heard himself say it and immediately knew how stupid it sounded, so he... doubled down on it. Walsh in a nutshell.
@@AdrianColleyyes! I think you got the nail on the head
In what universe is this an unbiased review?
In the echochamber universe.
Exactly😂
In what universe is this an intelligent statement?
@@stevenredpath9332
In what universe is this an intelligent reply ?
I assumed that was a bit of a joke given the asterisk and the fact that Walsh is an extremely biased "documentarian" anyway. Also, did you watch the video? Jesse did her best to focus on the film alone and not get into the rest of the Daily Wire's rubbish. Like, she could have pointed out that Walsh is cosplaying as that teacher character from Mr. Birchum and acting like that wacko caricature is a real person that exists. She did not, because this is a simple review about why the film is unappealing solely in context with itself. So, she's doing her best to be unbiased, but we should all know that "true objectivism" is not possible. We're humans with past experiences that inevitably give us biases. So long as we are aware of them and how they color our opinions and analysis, it's okay. That's just how being human works.
I totally forgot about Jeremy Jahn’s “Sound of Freedom” review until I saw his “Am I Racist” review… biiiiiiig self report there. Anyways great video as always, have some engagement!
When he did that Sound of Freedom review, I thought there's no way that he's that terminally offline. Now with this, he's fully exposed himself.
It was good and surprisingly serious. You end up taking from it whatever you want depending on what bias you apply to it.
To be fair if he hadn't tried to FIT IN he'd have been excluded
Another problem is that his fake hair doesn’t look any funnier than his usual hair
His beard looks like a prop.
@@hollandscottthomas I think that's what has always bothered me about his beard. It looks like it's made of cheap black faux fur.
And for a guy who hates gender non conformity, he sure does love any excuse for a wig
what about the fact that you had to go through surgery to pretend to be a woman, and you're not even close to ever being one, you'll remain a sad little man
Leave it to the libtards to make fun of someone’s appearance then be completely and utterly offended if someone does the same to them lmao
CONGRATULATIONS, JESSIE! Also, my deepest sympathies you watched this.
You should watch it. It's actually pretty funny.
How weak are you that watching a movie is some kind of epic undertaking?
Having not seen the movie, having no plans to, and pausing my first watch at 22 seconds in to type this comment:
Yes, Matt Walsh. You are.
Nah. You people are just unhinged.
@@giantfriendcrab6571 relax the guy must have just graduated from daycare..
@@giantfriendcrab6571 Meanwhile, that weirdo making these trashy "documentaries" doesn't even have a door, much less any hinges to secure one.
@@giantfriendcrab6571 Yeah, the guy who defended white supremacist and terrorist-defending group VDARE as just having "unfashionable views" is totally not racist. Nothing racist about pushing a conspiracy theory that Jews are deliberately forcing illegal immigration of non-Whites to the US so they can turn White people into a minority. It's everyone who notices Walsh does shit like that who's unhinged.
He's actually not though
they are trying SO hard to penetrate the real world of entertainment but only proving their failure as screenwriters and moviemakers is only eclipsed by their failure as human beings.
with their bold money making strategy of making these "movies" as cheap as possible so they can say "technically we made a profit!"
The reviews and ticket sales would say otherwise
@@needaladyfriend1 nah. this is the best it'll do. they've already run through the audience they're capable of garnering. sort of like trump.
@@ThorneIdentity #1 Political Documentary in 20 years is pretty good, what's your bar?
@@davidstephens7399 Lol by what bar is this the #1 political documentary in 20 years?
Critics aren’t reviewing Am I Racist? because the film did not have preview screenings so critics could write reviews. This is by design, so they don’t have to deal with the bad publicity of poor reviews and so they can push the narrative that critics are too scared to review it.
In interviews, he claims he sent out dozens of copies of the film to specific organizations (I recall he mentioned Rolling Stone was one of them), who, by-and-large, declined to review the film. I don't know if there is a one true way to solicit reviews, and "preview screenings" is that way. Maybe it is.
@@bozimmerman Well, you can just look it up, the answer is pretty easy to find.
It’s equally easy for Matt to claim he did that, but we also know that he fucking lies to the people he films for his “documentaries,” and DW copyright claims reviews on YT, so there’s no reason to believe he’s telling the truth.
@@manderly33 What did he lie about?
@@DemonDog444👈🏿 don’t feed the troll
@@ShadowProject01 How is asking an honest question trolling? Are you like one of those black masked atifa kids who goes around rallies telling people who they can and can't talk to?
The first part of reviewing a film is knowing the title of the film.
I caught that as well... but I think it was intentional, to add a little to his/hers/whoever's notion that it thinks Matt actually is a racist. Throwing the "a" in there points the finger a little more directly... if that makes sense.
@@Amazonian11 Well, given that this is coming from a member of a community that is extremely sensitive about deadnaming and using the wrong pronouns, it's a little rich to consistently use the wrong name for the film.... And if it's done intentionally then it's also hypocritical.
@@jabasabon absolutely agreed 💯
It's never meant to be about racism. It's about hiring people who deserve the job
So there's no problem with DEI hiring programs then, since they first make a pool of candidates that deserve the job; and then hire one of them.
@dariocarraresi1823 your hilarious
@dariocarraresi1823 I Actually meant qualified not deserve it my bad
@@JoshLand-xl6le Good news: DEI programs first make a pool of candidates who are qualfied (and who therefore deserve the job); and then hire one of them.
Idk about ya'll but I never once had to make any kind of movie about not being racist.
the guy had the audacity to condemn people for taking sick days, meanwhile his billionaire sugar daddy pays for him to fly around doing this crap and calling it "work"
"We need to make a song about how it's bad to diddle kids!"
If you think this movie is about Walsh not being a racist and not about the DEI people being incredibly racist swindlers I think you missed the point.
@suckieduckie the thing is, he's one of the incredibly racist swindlers
@@suckieduckie
DEI isn't racist in the same way hiring an all black team isn't racist. Go away.
First time seeing your content. A traditionally conservative person, irrespective of my views on this current subject, have to say copyright striking your video is predatory and hypocritical to who Matt Walsh and the Dailyawire portray themselves to be. Good on you for creating a civil discourse and shame on the daily wire
Gosh what a trashh you are. This freek woke asshol just like you, he wants matt walsh arrested.
So gfys about the Civil discourse
You can't believe a word this guy says.
Tell that to the Olympic Committee, who also submitted a copyright strike. Clearly, mistakes were made. But, to quote Jessie, "it suits his narrative to play the victim".
All movie companies and content creators, left and right, strike any video that uses more than an 8-second clip of their content. Jesse knows this very well and is obviously being disingenuous.
"we DEFINITELY need to make a movie about how we are NOT racist!!" the "anti-DEI" grifters gettin all twisted ROFL
I wouldn't even know about the term "D.E.I." if adult toddlers didn't throw temper tantrums about it and then... release those tantrums into actual movie theaters while saying "look how smart and normal I am." Twisted is the only word
I love saying you are giving an unbiased opinion and then spewing the most biased left leaning rhetoric possible. 😅
Hmmm... wonder why reality would lean left... almost as if that's how reality works
@@juliusdauksys2183 ya ya, the reality of leftism, one failed state after another lol
Of course
@@juliusdauksys2183fucking delusional 😭💀
@@juliusdauksys2183”Checkmate Conservatives!!!”
Lazier and more bad faith than What Is A Woman? I admit, that’s an accomplishment of note.
@@damejanea.macdonald2371 that is actually pretty impressive!
It’s really sad how many people apparently don’t realize that he’s a joke and evil
What is a woman? Try giving a scientific biological explanations instead of mentally ill delusional emotions.
Or do you feel exposed? Dont hide the fact you see him as evil due to not being part of your way of thinking.
Ok, go pay reparations then.
@@BaoPhan-ld5jo Is this satire? Do you seriously not understand how silly that is, even after having it pointed out to you?
"a film that's literally titled 'Am I a racist?'" - It's literally not titled that.
It's interesting you're criticizing someone for lying about who he is, putting on costumes, and pretending to be something he's not. 🤔 Reminds me of a GUY I saw in a video.
When did Jessie Gender lie about her biological sex characteristics (chromosomes, gonads etc)?
@@dariocarraresi1823 You're right; she never has. Guess some people who happen to like Matt Walsh don't have critical thinking skills.
it's a Shockumentary - a word I just made up to emphasise that it's a movie that doesn't aim to document reality, but to enrage viewers over imagined culture war issues
It's what happens when you don't have the credentials/willingness to make a serious documentary, but you're also not funny enough to make a comedy.
People have been using that made up word for years now though
But it does document reality. These are real people and real organizations.
@libertyspikes666 a cherry-picked reality of the worst examples he could find.
@@libertyspikes666That’s like saying reality TV “documents reality”
No, it documents a staged and highly edited version of reality presented in bad faith and achieved by lying to and misleading people.
do you know that anyone can send you a copyright strike? It doesn't have to be the daily wire. sometimes it's just youtube applying their regulations too strictly to avoid trouble.
There's a new tyler the creator's album out and he has to go through some stuff on youtube because the videos of people reacting to his new album r being taken down. He is not reporting users or anything. It happened with other musicians and ppl reacting to their music videos as well.
I checked, it was definitely the Daily Wire. Technically - a company they hired to make copyright claims for them, but definitely them.
I think that I don’t need to subject myself over an hour of unfunny, bs, nonsense to get the correct answer: yes.
What?! It's propaganda?! Who would have guessed?
Jessie? I think it may be Jackson
Just saw the movie, it made a great point and it was hilarious. Dont be so angry about it, its just a reality you refuse to accept.
Just another Matt meat rider. Make sure to get a diaper beforehand, he loves those
Matt isn't going to f*** you
You didnt even listen to the video/review.
@@beetlebob4675 oh hey beetlebot, good to see you here again. 😂😂
@@Witdabear
It's not reciprocated
This dude just hates the guy who made the movie. I didn’t know who Walsh was before he was making this movie, but I watched it because it looked hilarious. It’s actually very factual. I don’t think this guy really watched it. Probably just pulled clips.
Well yeah, when this guy pretends he's going to review the movie unbiased and ends up spewing baseless personal attacks for 16 minutes... Probably didn't watch more than 10 minutes
So your criticism is basically that Walsh doesn’t take race baiting grifters seriously?
The issue is that he goes into these interviews with bad faith and edits these people to look bad
@@xdarkwolf2255They literally all ready look bad by what they are saying? All white people are ******** I can’t even say what they say on here.
@@Syv_ you argue like mac from always sunny
The fact that Matt Walsh admitted to going into these interviews with intent to make the people look dumb while also going under false pretenses and having final say how the source footage gets edited is unethical and proof of bad faith.
The fact that I don't trust a man who has obvious bad faith and a history of editing footage to make himself look better like he did in the previous film isn't bad faith. It's healthy skepticism.
@@xdarkwolf2255sounds like a typical CNN interview
No, the point is that he takes grifters too seriously. He’s taking a parasitic industry that grew off of racial justice movements and presenting it as the racial justice movements.
Movie was awesome! Highly recommend.
He is so much better than Sasha.
I absolutely love the disguise. It's inspired by the one gender ideology doctor that he disliked the most during his what is a woman movie
@@CiriOfcentra-eq4kq Is that why literally everyone thought that Walsh was a weirdo?
@@dariocarraresi1823 everybody who? Do you identify as the world now 🤣🤣🤣
@@CiriOfcentra-eq4kq I'm sorry, didn't you watch the movie?
The DEI workshop Walsh participated in? Walsh kept interrupting and apologizing, so eventually people recognized him. And then he somehow managed to get the police called on him.
The people in the pub? Everyone looked at him like he was just spouting nonsense. (Which he was - the stuff he said was more absurd than everything everyone else said. Combined.)
All those talk shows Walsh performed on? Yeah, NONE of those scenes was actually aired. Why? Either because someone recognized Walsh before the video could be aired, or because Walsh acted so weird that management just treated the video as garbage and threw it out.
Robin DiAngelo? Walsh kept insisting so much on reparations over and over (despite the fact that DiAngelo explicitly told him that's not how reparations work), that he ended up making his own black colleague "Ben" uncomfortable. DiAngelo eventually agreed to pay money just to get rid of Matt - but only after checking with Ben if he would have accepted the money.
The fake DEI workshop that Walsh created near the end of the documentary? Most of the audience walked out after Walsh said a few sentences.
A Masterpiece
So in review, Matt isn't funny/clever enough to make a comedy, nor is he intelligent enough or willing to put in the effort to make a documentary, so he tries to do both and succeeds at neither. The scary thing is a guy in my church said he has "some interesting ideas," which feels like a mental gateway drug. He points out a few extreme examples to get you to agree with him, and then drip feeds you his worse takes like how indigenous people should feel grateful for "being civilized." Yeah, I'm sure my friends on the Rez in Arizona are thrilled they get to live in an age where they're constantly in court trying to get electricity and clean water to their communities.
Too many "Christians" that disgusted me out of any church because of bigotry...so much ick...
Ugh, I am so sick of the "This David Duke fellow has proposed some interesting ideas!" people. Quit lying to yourself and/or to the rest of us, coward.
He was intelligent enough to make $6+ million from the movie though as its lead. So that's at least something
@@silastithing6897 , grifting does require a kind of "dark" social intelligence, but it's not something we should celebrate, and it doesn't mean that a person is intelligent, thoughtful, knowledgeable, reflective, or inquisitive in other areas outside of their ability to sniff out and take advantage of an easy mark. It's like thinking a plant is globally "smart" because it can locate sources of sunlight.
So what you're saying is that listening to Matt's ideas is the equivalent of taking a gateway drug, and that you shouldn't do it? You're not going to learn anything if you resist opposing ideas. Go read up on the Socratic method and use it to grapple with Matt's and other ideas you disagree with. By the way, he isn't pointing out 'extreme' examples, not at all. The examples in the movie are the beating heart of the DEI movement, they're recurring themes, not extreme examples. :-)
"They are terrified to even mention a film that mocks the DEI industry because they know the DEI industry can only survive if no one is allowed to question it."
This coming from Matt Walsh and the Daily Wire that have videos that criticize them and their views copyright stricken and taken down left and right. The same Matt Walsh and the Daily Wire that throws a temper tantrum any time they are even remotely criticized for anything.
In my best Darth Vader impression: "The Projection is strong with this one."
I look forward to any video you make that tears apart any project by Walsh, a man with absolutely no critical thinking skills and whose knowledge of the world and life in general peeked in grade school... middle school if I'm feeling generous.
Actions speak louder than words, everyone is praising the film even non biased reviewers. So keep hatin…haters are fans too lol
Why you mad people making fun of leftism?
@@bigginsg8711 it's the intention behind it, like Jessie said. If Matt was criticizing scammers in a lucrative moral panic, that's one thing. But his point is "racism isn't happening and anyone who brings it up is dumb," meanwhile on his own podcast he complains about "anglo-saxon extinction" and that indigenous people should be grateful for being "civilized." There's plenty about the Left to critique, but Matt's not interested in nuance. He's just against anything that makes him uncomfortable.
@@TheRogueCommand Incorrect. Matt never says racism isnt happening.
@@TheRogueCommandBut he showed evidence in his movie. He proved his point. His intentions were to mock stupid behavior.
One of the criticism is that he interviews some of the most unhinged people. Since it's a comedy that has a goal at killing the business of grifters, he should do that.
Except that's not the goal of the movie, according to Walsh.
if you were to ask me to imagine a conservative borat I would imagine a unfunny person who completely missed the point of borat and what made him funny. so thats probably the one thing he lived up to :p
My coworker misread the title as "I am Racist". I told her it was a more accurate title
Kazahstan is not in the Middle East.
Don't be surprised if he tries to block this video as well.
Also "The left hates free speech."
He’s blocking videos? ☠️
@@manga-1173 He tries to use a copyright strike to block videos.
@@2727rogers And they say the left are a bunch of snowflakes 🙄
@@manga-1173 The thing about snowflakes if you put enough of them together you will have a storm.
But...its not a parody, he just lets these people expose themself, what is going here.
Media Matters' article on Matt Walsh. He just talked, and they exposed his words.
@@dariocarraresi1823
Yeah...."his words" are what made people in the movie look evil, greedy and downright authoritarian.
@@Ixiah27 No, that was his malicious video editing.
@@dariocarraresi1823
Sure...his editing made these people explain how they use DEI to scam money.
@@Ixiah27 Nothing in the movie supports your claim.
I find it funny how much Matt's disguise looks like the "woke teacher" from Mr. Birchum. Also by DW of course. Dudes are overflowing with creativity.
I was actually surprised at how good this movie is. Pretty funny actually
Thanks for all your work. Been a fan for years.
People are desperately coping in the comments since this documentary has been so successful lol
make believe is the MO
agreed.
Hon, Matt's Meat Riders ™ are all tf over the comment section.
Y'all need jobs.
🤣
@@beetlebob4675 at least the meat you think we ride is not attached to a "woman"
@@berndbernd3464
Transphobia. Bigotry. How usual for Matt and his ilk.🥱
why First 6 mins of your 15 mins review was about yourself???
And why is “am I a racist?”ranked highest-grossing documentary film of 2024 if it’s that bad?
Cool, highest grossing means nothing when it comes to documentaries
@@juliusdauksys2183 Time to grow up
@@cerealhit555 yeah... I did... that's why I know that money doesn't make art successful
Matt Walsh on Native Americans: Well they all fought in wars, so it was right for Europeans to commit genocide
Matt Walsh on slavery: Well every nation did it back then, so you can't unfairly blame the U.S. Also, slavery was very beneficial to the U.S.
Lunatic lghdtv like you always invents things like that in your head.
@@Themiddleearther1990 what are you talking about? These are things Matt has actually said, genius.
@@Themiddleearther1990 Those are positions Matt Walsh published on his own website and videos. Are you calling Matt Walsh a liar?
@@Themiddleearther1990Matt walsh has literally said this
@@PatrickWDunne It's a strawmen of what he said, but sure. I find the first one dubious, but the second one is just factually correct. In most non-western countries some degree of slavery is still the norm. Libia still has open air slave markets, half our stuff is manufactured by something like slaves in east Asia with minerals recycled by children on African garbage belts. It's also weird to blame the US for it because the US only existed since 1776 when most slaves were already taken there by the Brits and French a century before.
Currently 98% with 1000+ ratings. Making fun of crazy people still has an audience.
The thing is that the movie doesn’t deliberately make fun of the crazy people like Walsh, so the “success” of the movie is more down to the fact that only the wires indoctrinated followers watched it and all gave their lord and savior positive reviews because it reinforces their biases.
@@davidpacifico1019 You can dismiss me as indoctrinated if you wish but the movie quotes people like Ibram Kendi who has called for discrimination based on race, Robin DiAngelo who has instructed people to "be less white", and the women who host dinners where white women pay $5000 to sit at a posh dinner and sip wine as the pontificate about what a horrible society they must live in.
Bias in in the eye of the beholder, but most people see these grifters as the extremists when their words are exposed outside their little bubbles.
@@davidpacifico1019so u think that the ppl who say white ppl are problematic and evil simply bc they're white and that they should feel guilty for the crimes of their ancestors aren't crazy but Matt is crazy for exposing those ppl?
“Our film is actually good!” That doesn’t sound at all like “Grade A Coping” as Matt puts it. 😅 While I have no desire to check out Daily Wire’s latest DWCU dumpster fire, it was already clear from the title what kind of movie this was gonna be. If Elon Musk made a movie called “Am I A Desperate Asshole Most People Including My Family Hate?” it would be just as predictable and stupid. Matt Walsh’s version of Borat is just “America Number One!” without any self awareness of the character they’re portraying. I’ve seen much better acting from all the essay videos I’ve seen from you. 😂🫶🩷🩷🩷
Him being repeatedly figured out as an alt-right crank in real time is the actual comedy in this movie, I don't know how he thought this was a performance to be proud of 😂😂😂
😂😂😂he was literally allowed to stand behind the wh0re cumala wtf are you smoking?
How many times did it happen?
@BP-or2iu At every "focus group" type meeting that he arranged or crashed. The video's long but it's worth it, the dudes a clown.
@@MrDeelightful Where’s this video?
@@BP-or2iu the one you're commenting on
this is gonna be the funniest documentary ever ! wohoo!!!!
Lord help me, I almost feel bad for M.W., because it doesn't seem like he does anything well. He failed upwards and desperately wants people to think of him as some kind of supremely talented "actor"/"raconteur" when he's just an average bearded dude.
That's an insult to the average white dude - Walsh is below average.
98% Audience Score...
@@pixelsheep8939 The argument from popularity is a logical fallacy. You lose.
@@oxman5571 "He doesn't do anything well" well 98% of Audience say otherwise. How is that a logical fallacy 😂
@pixelsheep8939 the only people who bothered to review it are people he panders to. He only has fans so long as he tells them what they want to hear ((look how quick they turned on him when he said not to drink raw milk))
As a black person almost every group shown in this movie was offensive and pandering and I honestly think these ppl think less of me and everyone that looks like me.
yeah i saw this movie and everyone was howling or cringing at those seminars. i cant imagine one black person would watch this movie and think those seminars are a good thing. say what you want about matt walsh, but that doesnt mean these scam artists he spoke to are good people.
@@nullakjg767 thats a fair opinion, but matt framing these seminars and the author of White Fragility as the be all and end all of anti-racist thought is really disingenuous when there are so many authors and thinkers out there and on the ground work being done.
@@llynxfyremusic There is no "be all and end all of anti-racist thought" because people arrive at these ideals by themselves as they are basic ideas like "don't pee on your food". Is like having an expert on how to eat from a plate, very redundant and pretentious as being against racism is a natural conclusion to most of the population, yet media profits by selling the idea that we are still in the 19 century and all minorities have shackles. And if you disagree you are evil
@@llynxfyremusic I have yet to see a version of it that's not condescending and regressive. I don't want white ppl to consider my race when dealing with me just my character. They would rather the world handle me with children's gloves on as if I'm fragile and need anything from them
Good because we do think less of you
Hello! I'm a transfem in WGS and many of my discussions about this and WIAW? have been primarily focused on appropriating important questions to a deradicalization journey. Their status as a movie means it will appear at the top of many Google search results. This gives conservatives a huge advantage in attracting people to radicalization rather than deprogramming if this makes sense
Technically speaking. Everybody is racist. You can never 100% turn away from bias. It just falls under a spectrum. Some people are more racist then others but ironically it is not a black or white situation
And in this short comment you have already demonstrated significantly more thought and insight into the subject than Matt Walsh bothered to.
Bias does not necessarily mean racism. Bias is the tendency to gravitate to someone familiar (I.e. someone like yourself). There is no malice in that, just natural self- centeredness.
An alternate armchair psychologist theory: Everyone is a Tribalist, of which racism is one kind of tribalism. Whichever group identity one ties their identity to, that is their Tribe. Everyone outside of it is Other and Beneath.
If true, it means that everyone CAN be racist, but they could also be Nationaist, Sexist, Globalist, or any sort of Ist. The wolf you feed helps determine it.
I think what people like Matt Walsh think is a different kind of racism. You can have bias and be naturally inclined to gravitate towards people similar to yourself, sure. That's probably what you're referring to. What the DW and its following believe is something more to the effect of "White is SUPERIOR to all other races BECAUSE of my whiteness." This isn't just something white conservatives think, either. This is the type of racism that is instilled into people all over the world in the form of extreme nationalism.
The issue is that society is structurally racist.
You can't avoid it without taking positive steps to learn.
That often means listening to marginalized people.
You know…I don’t think D’Angelo is a grifter, but I sure think Matt Walsh is one. Robin D’Angelo isn’t perfect by any means, but she at least tries to talk to other white folks about racism. She’s not unproblematic, but she’s also not like the final boss of DEI professionals. Matt prolly only fw Robin D’Angelo because he couldn’t handle the Jane Elliotts of the world. It would’ve been a bloodbath if Jane Elliott had been the interviewee rather than Robin D’Angelo lmao.
Miss Jane would've ripped Matt a new one! LOL!
you dont? you think only people who have 30-50k dollars should be allowed to talk about racism?
Jane Elliot? The quack who did an unethical study on elementary school children?
I'll save you some time here: the actual review starts at the 5:10 mark. The first third of the video is just politics...
You conveniently left out how he got Robin DiAngelo to say she is ambivalent about reparations and still gets her to pay $30 in reparations to a black producer on set. The point is SHE KNOWS THAT SHE'S BEING FILMED and that's why she did it. Based on her own rhetoric, that is the right thing to do, which is why it's ridiculous.
No, that's not what happened - not that you would know, since Walsh deliberately edited the footage to obscure the context.
What happened is that _Walsh_ proclaimed that "reparations" means that individual white people should pay individual black people; and that therefore, both him and DiAngelo should give money to Bob (Walsh's black colleague). DiAngelo repeatedly told Walsh that no, reparations don't work that way; but Walsh kept insisting and insisting, making everyone - Bob included - uncomfortable. Eventually DiAngelo paid Bob (but not before asking him if he was okay with that) just to shut Walsh up.
After the scene was filmed, DiAngelo contacted the team, told them to not show that scene in the documentary because it would leave people with a wrong idea of what reparations are, and mentioned several other sources, books and experts that could explain reparations better than her. The crew agreed and thanked her, then they published the scene anyway (after some really bad editing).
When DiAngelo realized the trickery, she published a post explaining what actually happened. The best part? Walsh had absolutely no counter. He couldn't deny anything that she said. The only thing he objected to was that DiAngelo called his wig weird, while he thought that the wig was fine.
Someone correct me if I’m wrong but the White Fragility book. It sounds like step one of ‘white’s people understanding of how to fight racism’ and that’s fine, but it forgets to mention the next 2-10 steps where the actual fighting of racism happens.
Step one: understand that racism is systematic and that sitting there and feeling guilty about it isn’t gonna do squat
Step 2-9: actually fight racism
Lots of folks--including the dei folks--see few same gap
Have you actualy read White fragility? Because I have and it's absolutely crazy. She litteraly says that a black and white person can't have any interaction ever without racism occuring.
Yes, the book is bad and DeAngelis is a hack.
Too bad for Matt that anyone who’s been paying attention already knew this. He’s shooting fish in a barrel with that one.
@@manderly33 Ok, then what about the Moana problem? That seems fair criticism.
@@suckieduckie or the "dinner party" full of racism, white guilt and condescension
LOL! Both movies were spot on, and it hurts your feelings.
@@joshwilson2271 spot on about what ? That Matt Walsh is desperately begging for Hollywood's attention but can't seem to get it
@Joshwilson2271 🤭🫵 stinky
@@joshwilson2271 you're subbed to Asmongold? Eeewww
I don't suppose there's a way to "upload a review" to UA-cam that is just a URL to where it's uploaded elsewhere where abuse of copyright claims can't take it down and have it do as well as posting it to UA-cam as normal until it gets frivolously taken down, is there?
Jessie talks about earnestness and its not wrong to expect it but really, is that even possible from these people? If the tim pool situation has reiterated anything its that they're willing to spout whatever nonsense will get them cash
They EARNESTLY want to get attention and money.
The funniest thing about this is how bad Matt Walsh s at "disguising" himself. long hair and flannel aint gonna do it buddy lol. I watched Dead Domain when they went undercover at RNC and they were almost unrecognizable. That's how it's done haha
Walsh's greatest disguise is most people have no Idea who he is. He's confusing that for cunning.
If the beard and dead eyes don't give him away, the gravel-in-a-blender voice of his will
@TheRogueCommand it's almost like an AI still learning to be human, but somehow Matt is still less human
@@TheRogueCommand he probably used his real voice in the "disguise" not that put on drag king voice he uses for his show.
So is there a number of blacks Walsh should have interviewed that would have convinced you he is not racist? What is that nunber, and why are you the arbiter of that?
The trailer, Walsh: "Was it the 17 black friends? Maybe it was more like 15 . . ."
Does this joke make him racist? Along with only having one assistant and a black singer for the soundtrack?
Why do these things proveably make him racist?
Of course he is trying to make merch for the Daily Wire. There is no concealment about this. Seems like a moot issue--unless you contrast this with the numerous DEI grifts in the movie that talk a good one but solve nothing--and charge hundreds of thousands for non-existent solutions. I'm on this journey. Help me out?
My problem with the concept of the movie is exactly that, its superficial and pandering. What was said about figures like the mainstream DEI profiteers has been said time and time again, free and legitimate criticism is out there.
A lot of Walshs criticism from the right towards the conservatives™️ gets drowned out by the hordes. I am far far from a progressive or post modernists but at least i will acknowledge that their world view isnt consistent.
Many of these discussions on these topics about gender/sexuality/race go over the heads of those in the mainstream, not exactly a new problem tho. If you remember Spencer versus Sargon, as Sargon now is now appropriating points from Spencer, but a big issue for the cons™️ is the fundamental denial of racial identity -and by extension denying sexual and gender identity- but straining the importance of ones ideas and opinions. Something something Martin Luther King JR Is infallible.
But also somehow forgetting that "whiteness" "white people" is inherently progressive and has a basis in modern liberalism. Its also why i believe the term "abolish whiteness" is actually triggering to them because of the lack of understanding the fundamental concept of where that term comes from.
I tried explaining this to some of my friends on the far right and many get it. But those who are lukewarm or reactionary dont. These cons dont get it, never have. They only started tagging on "but what about white people" because of the far right pressure put upon them.
Anyways good criticism. God Bless.
It's because your premises are bullshit and people notice your dishonesty and arrogance with relative ease.
Thank you man, great review ❤
Wait what, I feel maybe Mr. Walsh might be mildly anachronistic and overestimates his comedic talent just a smidgen.
It would be great if your review was just "yes" followed by 15 minutes of royalty free music.
Knowing Jessie, the rest of the video would be obscure Star Trek theories XD
Is it me, or does Matt Walsh's "disguise " make him look like a conservative Jarred Leto?
@@antheathetiefling8581 he reminds me more of an extra from "the last of the mohicans"
What conservatives look like his disguise?