How Singapore Plans To Pipe Electricity From Australia

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 лип 2024
  • 95% of Singapore's electricity comes from burning natural gas. They do not have many alternatives. Not sure if you have heard, but Singapore is a small island. No room for sprawling solar or wind farms. A few rooftop solar panels on residential buildings. That is about it.
    But what if you were to pipe in the electricity from overseas?
    The Australia-ASEAN Power Link is a mega-project looking to bring renewable solar energy from Australia all the way to Singapore. It is also referred to as the "Sun Cable", after the Singaporean company developing the project.
    In this video, I want to dive into how this company intends to bring clean solar power all the way to the Lion City.
    Chapters
    1:11 The Proposal
    2:10 Transmitting Power
    4:25 The Better Economics of HVDC
    7:30 The Subsea Cable Challenge
    10:52 Money and Execution
    13:09 Conclusion
    Credit and kudos to ‪@shazmosushi‬ for suggesting this topic.
    Links:
    - The Asianometry Newsletter: asianometry.com
    - Patreon: / asianometry

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,8 тис.

  • @Asianometry
    @Asianometry  3 роки тому +14

    For more insightful analyses, check out the Asianometry Science and Nature Playlist:
    ua-cam.com/play/PLKtxx9TnH76RGmBE75_3gOj3vz9m0J3Dw.html

    • @johnweiner
      @johnweiner Рік тому

      Quite right about the skin effect, but most of the world uses 50Hz (which makes the skin effect even more negligible)...don't know if this project envisions 60Hz or 50Hz or some other frequency.

    • @benbarca
      @benbarca Рік тому

      This will never work, stupid idea....

    • @JamesDean6133
      @JamesDean6133 Рік тому

      Project has collapsed. The company is in administration

  • @pjacobsen1000
    @pjacobsen1000 3 роки тому +681

    If this project ever comes to fruition, they should have the Australian heavy rock band AC/DC play at the opening ceremony.

    • @shazmosushi
      @shazmosushi 3 роки тому +40

      lol even just playing the song "Thunderstruck" over drone footage flying over that gigantic NT solar farm would be a great promo video! The proposed solar farm allotment shown at timestamp 2:03 is 12 MILES long and 6 MILES wide (or 20 kilometres by 10 kilometres). Bigger than Manhattan Island! I want to see the drone footage!

    • @aave865
      @aave865 3 роки тому +19

      Singaporeans somehow love the song by Men at Work....do you come from the land down under? 😆🇸🇬❤

    • @shazmosushi
      @shazmosushi 3 роки тому +7

      @@aave865 Good choice too! Links for the lazy:
      AC/DC - Thunderstruck: ua-cam.com/video/v2AC41dglnM/v-deo.html
      Men At Work - Down Under: ua-cam.com/video/XfR9iY5y94s/v-deo.html

    • @markedwards4879
      @markedwards4879 3 роки тому +6

      @@shazmosushi nah, High Voltage from AC/DC is a much better choice. ua-cam.com/video/Nnjh-zp6pP4/v-deo.html

    • @steveallen1340
      @steveallen1340 3 роки тому +15

      @@markedwards4879 “High Voltage” is definitely the song for it

  • @willyou2199
    @willyou2199 3 роки тому +322

    The skin effect is miniscule at 60hz. The reason why they use DC is because of AC capacitive coupling. Basically, AC can conduct through non-conductors, but this effect is proportional to surface contact with another closely positioned conductor. This is a small but non-negligible issue when AC is transferred over long distances over land, where AC couples with the semi-conductive ground. It is still manageable, and is not much of a concern outside safety.
    Its only a big of a problem when these wires are placed in the ocean, where everywhere is extremely conductive salt water. Electrical power transfer over sea is always via DC to prevent this sort of capacitive losses.

    • @FlashMustache
      @FlashMustache 3 роки тому +37

      THANK YOU! I was just about to comment on this. First time I see asianometry making a mistake :). All of Europe is one massive synchronous grid, but the UK is not connected due to the sea. They're connected with HVDC instead. As that's just a short distance, using HVDC would make no sense going by the videos explanation.

    • @danp1224
      @danp1224 3 роки тому +3

      You can’t use dc at that distance.

    • @LDRAGONFLYL
      @LDRAGONFLYL 3 роки тому +13

      This. Skin effect only really kicks in at much higher frequencies.

    • @mb-3faze
      @mb-3faze 3 роки тому +2

      Was he right about the small losses using HVDC? Also, I'd no idea the Chinese were using HVDC above ground with power transmission from the 3 Gorges dam. I heard they were using giga-volt potential. Gigavolt DC equipment must be pretty impressive.

    • @szurketaltos2693
      @szurketaltos2693 3 роки тому

      Why is Hydro-Québec's transmission line to New England HVDC then?

  • @saumyacow4435
    @saumyacow4435 Рік тому +179

    As an Australian engineer the thing that I find most curious about this project is that they propose to export the electricity to Singapore - rather than use the electricity locally to convert it to other useful things (hydrogen, aluminium, fresh water, cement, steel.. etc). I think we'd do better exporting energy-embedded materials than simply the electricity.

    • @brucetutton7897
      @brucetutton7897 Рік тому +31

      It is a proposal from Singapore to import. It clearly says so in the description and content. Australian governments have been extremely hostile towards renewable projects. There is a lot of coal in Queensland. This kind of project would be out of character for any Australian government.

    • @zen1647
      @zen1647 Рік тому +4

      Yes, energy embedded material manufacturing is a great way for Australia to go! I hope support for this huge economic opportunity grows.

    • @spdfatomicstructure
      @spdfatomicstructure Рік тому +11

      Well, if this project proves to be economical despite the extensive cable lengths, it could open up further possibilities. For example a nuclear plant in Alice Springs providing electricity for the entirety of the mainland so that Tasmania can then keep its hydroelectricity for itself

    • @TheHsan22
      @TheHsan22 Рік тому +2

      @@spdfatomicstructure Nuclear?? There would be too much opposition in Aus.
      As the video shows Aus has an abundance of solar and hydro, adding wind installations and related proposals, "big" batteries going in all over the country, nuclear is not needed.

    • @Crashandburn999
      @Crashandburn999 Рік тому +11

      @@TheHsan22 Solar does not produce power through the night. Coal power is still going to be needed for the night, and I doubt hydro would be sufficient to replace all the coal power. Nuclear power is the best solution, and everyone i've ever spoken to all agree. I live in Australia btw and i've never met anyone as far as I know who opposes nuclear power. I think it's the mining companies lobbying to keep coal power the dominate source of power because I don't think there is that opposition among the general population.

  • @MoritzvonSchweinitz
    @MoritzvonSchweinitz 2 роки тому +224

    It's strange that the price tags of these monumental and important mega projects are in the same dimension as the acquisition of some app that gets aquired by some tech giant. Prices really are a strange thing.
    But II need help! I've been bingewatching this great channel for hours now!

    • @rayhans7887
      @rayhans7887 Рік тому +11

      Truly. Also compare with military procurement Mind-boggling

    • @alexjenner1108
      @alexjenner1108 Рік тому +5

      @@rayhans7887 if the numbers are correct, you might might be able purchase a single aircraft carrier and perhaps a few F-35 aircraft for the cost of this project.

    • @NATIK001
      @NATIK001 Рік тому +6

      All acquisitions like that are priced based on future performance and not current current or past costs, especially in tech this has been a self-reinforcing spiral making everything crazy priced.
      These projects have costs based on actual real world things like resources and man hours, rather than fantasies of perfect performance over many years to come.

    • @nikchi
      @nikchi Рік тому +4

      Maintenance costs start to grow the instant the project is finished vs a application which is expected to make more money as it grows

    • @cyrilio
      @cyrilio Рік тому

      Enjoy your binge. The awesome thing about this channel is that there’s a lot more to come. Unlike TV shows that either get worse over time or just end.

  • @arthurwitherby
    @arthurwitherby 3 роки тому +76

    The main issue with running AC underwater, is from induction losses since salt water is a good conductor, the cable acts as a large capacitor. This isn't an issue with DC

    • @kumaleawjing-jing2811
      @kumaleawjing-jing2811 Рік тому

      It can be develop to ferroresonance right?
      And i think main issue is Singapore is not friendly to Malaysia and Indonesia , then Singapore turn to Australia which make higher cost.

  • @Dr.Kraig_Ren
    @Dr.Kraig_Ren 3 роки тому +49

    _"All this for using more ACs."_
    ~Kento Bento

  • @UnipornFrumm
    @UnipornFrumm 3 роки тому +185

    Now dessert counties actually have a resource in abundance to export,sun

    • @trentbrady8829
      @trentbrady8829 3 роки тому +4

      Australia gives it all away for free

    • @Johnsmith-zi9pu
      @Johnsmith-zi9pu 3 роки тому +8

      If Australia wants to become co2 neutral using solar panels they would need a land area four and a half times the size of their country; professor Ian Plimer has crunched the numbers. I hope he sees this video he will have a good laugh.

    • @trentbrady8829
      @trentbrady8829 3 роки тому +12

      @@Johnsmith-zi9pu a house can be fully self sufficient from solar just make it compulsory to build a house without it , but the government can’t steel your money so they would try to charge u tax for your panels yearly

    • @tacitdionysus3220
      @tacitdionysus3220 3 роки тому +15

      Dessert counties (sic) have always had it sweet

    • @Johnsmith-zi9pu
      @Johnsmith-zi9pu 3 роки тому +4

      @@trentbrady8829 Fully self sufficient???? A fully self sufficient house and that includes cooking, heating etc.would require a quarter of an acre of solar panels and a shed full of toxic batteries.It's clear you have no understanding solar.

  • @BrendanGeormer
    @BrendanGeormer Рік тому +5

    Going back through your older videos, interesting to note that earlier this year the plan fell apart.

  • @ronaldhee6608
    @ronaldhee6608 3 роки тому +74

    Thanks! If you didn't post this, I would never have known about this borderline insane megaproject!

    • @sirilscout3686
      @sirilscout3686 3 роки тому +6

      Agree ... Insane ...

    • @whynotsa6866
      @whynotsa6866 3 роки тому +1

      I actually found it out on wendover productions or his friends lol I don't even remember which channel

    • @ALTINSEA1
      @ALTINSEA1 2 роки тому

      it just cable, we dont change the flow of the river or bore through a stone mountain so ship can pass through it like the norwegian did.

    • @linmal2242
      @linmal2242 Рік тому

      @syanin dita Yeah, good point !

    • @cerealport2726
      @cerealport2726 Рік тому +1

      not just borderline insane, but truly insane. still, if it happens, some people will get very rich while the Australian taxpayers will suffer the consequences, though they wont suffer as much as the Uyghur slaves in the Chinese solar panel factories.
      No one in their right mind thinks this will use Australian made products.

  • @acmefixer1
    @acmefixer1 3 роки тому +116

    There is also a plan to build a huge solar array near Pilbara in Australia and use its output to electrolyze water into green hydrogen. This will be liquified and shipped to other Asian countries, where it can be used to generate green electricity among other things. So there is an alternative way to eliminate the fossil fuels and not have to transmit electricity long distances. If you're reading this, I guess you should make a video about this plan.

    • @shazmosushi
      @shazmosushi 3 роки тому +9

      For those interested, that project is called "Asian Renewable Energy Hub" and was originally another submarine power cable project (from Pilbara, Western Australia not central Northern Territory)

    • @kennethferland5579
      @kennethferland5579 3 роки тому +15

      liquified hydrogen for export is nonsense, it takes huge energy to liquify it, their are no ships capable of transporting it and no infrastructure to burn it upon arrival. For less energy you can just synthesize hyrdocarbons from the hydrogen and ship that. Or utilize the hydrogen to directly smelt Australian iron ore into steel and export that.

    • @usausa2390
      @usausa2390 3 роки тому +3

      They are not cost effective we export coal why not burn it ourselves . there is something wrong in Canberra it stinks of corruption

    • @TonyWhite22351
      @TonyWhite22351 3 роки тому +9

      @@usausa2390 You are obviously blissfully unaware of the challenges faced by the planet primarily caused by carbon emissions !

    • @usausa2390
      @usausa2390 3 роки тому

      @@TonyWhite22351 tell what is your solution

  • @corlisswu2888
    @corlisswu2888 2 роки тому +9

    Tengeh floating 60 MW
    All Solar planned 2 MW
    Singapore thermal installed capacity 12000 MW
    NT Australia 10000 MW
    Area occupied 12000 ha or 120 sq-km
    SG area 720 km
    This is huge, huge. John is not ignorant.
    Guys, focus. It’s about renewable, not nationalism.
    Deeply indebted to John for making this great video.
    A Q: If SG imports from 10 GW NT plant, what will happen to the local gas fired plants?

  • @mfx1
    @mfx1 Рік тому +14

    Another big advantage of HVDC between countries is that you don't have to synchronise their grids which you can't even do if you're going between a 60Hz and 50Hz country.

  • @digbystrong2829
    @digbystrong2829 3 роки тому +65

    I like the idea of using a desert area as a major source of solar power. However, did I miss any mention of the risks of placing an undersea cable directly along the line of some of the highest seismic activity in the world?

    • @Waldemarvonanhalt
      @Waldemarvonanhalt Рік тому +9

      Egypt thought about it and came to the conclusions it's stupid. They opted to build NPPs instead.

    • @CountingStars333
      @CountingStars333 Рік тому +1

      You like it but solar panels need water to cool. Deserts don't work.

    • @alanpoh2879
      @alanpoh2879 Рік тому +1

      Yes Pass by the ring of fire.

    • @sandeepn94
      @sandeepn94 Рік тому +3

      @@CountingStars333solar photovoltaic panels don’t need cooling. There’s plenty of them out in some of the hottest places on the planet.

    • @bernielennox1031
      @bernielennox1031 Рік тому +2

      So destroying thousands of Sq kilometres of desert doesn’t bother anyone these area are not devoid of life and are often more sensitive

  • @gregdobbs2577
    @gregdobbs2577 Рік тому +2

    hello Jon at Asianometry,
    I have been listening for a long while and, thank you. I have learned much and see some things differently. I enjoy your work, please, keep at it.

  • @rudbarnes8577
    @rudbarnes8577 3 роки тому +1

    The most informative video I've seen, examining assorted aspects of the proposal. Well done!

    • @cerealport2726
      @cerealport2726 Рік тому

      yes, it shows what a scam this project really is, well done!

  • @kenoliver8913
    @kenoliver8913 2 роки тому +16

    An important point you miss here is that the per km transmission losses for an HVAC cable are much higher undersea than they are on land, which is not so for HVDC. So the breakeven distance for HVAC vs HVDC is FAR shorter underwater than on land. Basically noone builds underwater HVAC cables for more than a few kms - more than that and you need HVDC.

  • @gavinwilliamson681
    @gavinwilliamson681 3 роки тому +12

    Love the subtle quips! Oh, and a darn good story as well. Keep up the great work please!

    • @kenoliver8913
      @kenoliver8913 Рік тому +1

      Yep. Speaking as an Australian though I'm sorry to see our massive platypus export industry replaced ...

    • @stephenchallis1592
      @stephenchallis1592 Рік тому

      @@kenoliver8913 𝐋𝐎𝐋

  • @Sean_Coyne
    @Sean_Coyne 3 роки тому +12

    The Tasmanian cable failed because Bass Link cooked it by pushing it to it's limits to sell Hydro power to the mainland when prices were high. We would usually be OK for our power here in Tassie as we have heaps of hydro and wind power, but there was a drought on and they had run the damns down to risky levels. Although we have a backup gas generator it would not have coped, so Hydro Tasmania had to import a heap of contingency generators to guarantee supply (I knew the guy who was organising all this and it nearly killed him with the stress). Singapore would be well advised to have a workable back up plan if their cable from Oz failed.

    • @robman2095
      @robman2095 2 роки тому +3

      I think they said 20% of total power so it actually would improve the diversity of the sources of supply but they would need some excess capacity to allow for failure in any of their sources including this one.

    • @linmal2242
      @linmal2242 Рік тому

      That is why the Gordon below Frankiln should have gone ahead. And it will sometime, when idiot Brown is dead, you watch, if you are still alive by then! How grows the Tassie population ?

    • @linmal2242
      @linmal2242 Рік тому

      So, all the Hoo Ha surrounding the Dams issue ( '"'Let the Rivers Run Free".... B. S. ) will, sooner or later be overuled by some 'progressive' govt. some day wanting to generate clean power for a burgeoning population of immigrants who won't care a twig for all Browns bull !

    • @linmal2242
      @linmal2242 Рік тому

      So, what do those 'contingecy generators ' run on; clean hydro - generated electrical power? Or poluting Diesel Fuel ?..... A Pyrrhic Victory perhaps?

    • @graceair3118
      @graceair3118 3 місяці тому

      Singapore will be getting some solar power from Indonesia Batam.

  • @imp3r1alx
    @imp3r1alx 3 роки тому +145

    The moment you realize.. your friend prefer to ask for help from someone across the room, instead of asking you who is their neighbour..

    • @shadowmistress999
      @shadowmistress999 3 роки тому +36

      Singapore’s neighbor s**ks
      yes I am a proud Malaysian
      Malaysia s**cks as everyone knew it

    • @awesomewav2419
      @awesomewav2419 3 роки тому +9

      not only that Australia gets the most amount of constant sun light

    • @Cysecsg
      @Cysecsg 3 роки тому +35

      Well, when the neighbour loves and had histories of using natural resource to threaten.

    • @sulaimanakhleken9909
      @sulaimanakhleken9909 3 роки тому +6

      dont mention indonesia

    • @MrBlurpBlurp-hg3dj
      @MrBlurpBlurp-hg3dj 3 роки тому

      AC/DC's Big Balls ...my balls are always bouncing to the left and to the right (Bon Scott)

  • @yaenlauper7272
    @yaenlauper7272 3 роки тому +25

    Thank you for your effort in delivering such a good presentation! Allow me to point out a minor detail, in that ABB did not exist in 1954. ABB is the result of a merger of Swedish ASEA and Swiss Brown-Boveri companies much later in the twentieth century. Cheers!

    • @linmal2242
      @linmal2242 Рік тому +2

      Thankyou, as I did not know of the history of that merger, and had wondered why I never hear of those two parent companies anymore !

  • @axeldt183
    @axeldt183 3 роки тому +3

    you make great videos my man, keep it up

  • @graceair3118
    @graceair3118 3 місяці тому

    Very informative video. Thanks so much for sharing! ❤❤❤

  • @robman2095
    @robman2095 3 роки тому +8

    This is a very good video particularly in explaining HVDC high voltage direct current transmission which most people know nothing about I think.

    • @roxyview
      @roxyview 3 роки тому

      TIME WE STOPPED THE BULLSHIT BEHIND WHY: The real reason behind this Singapore owns more of Australia than Australia www.crikey.com.au/2007/05/02/singapore-owns-more-of-australia-than-australia/
      Here’s a list of Australian commercial assets controlled by the Singapore Government:
      Optus: $10 billion
      Alinta energy assets: $4.3 billion
      Victorian electricity transmission monopoly: $2 billion
      Old Texas Utilities Australian portfolio: $5.5 billion
      Property: $2 billion
      Australand stake: $1 billion
      Total: $22.8 billion
      The Singaporeans prefer to play down the scale of their Australian assets, but this little country of 4 million people has left us for dead when it comes to national savings and global investments. It will be interesting to hear what Peter Costello and John Howard say when the question is put to them about the Government’s residual commercial assets being less than those held by Singapore.

    • @robman2095
      @robman2095 2 роки тому

      @@roxyview Yes they are the sixth largest foreign capital investor in australia

  • @dac545j
    @dac545j 3 роки тому +8

    I enjoyed the presentation, the jokes and the ironic asides. Good work.

  • @LahLahLahification
    @LahLahLahification 3 роки тому +12

    great video on a really interesting yet unexplored topic! I'm from Singapore and rooting for the success of these renewable energy projects - hopefully we can sort out the technical and political issues.

    • @cerealport2726
      @cerealport2726 Рік тому

      I've spent a fair bit of time in Singapore over the years, and loved it. However, maybe Singapore can start using less electricity...? Maybe Singapore could import cheap electricity from its neighbours instead....?

    • @exoticredtadpole2713
      @exoticredtadpole2713 11 місяців тому

      @@cerealport2726 If Singapore thinks it is more economical to import solar power from all the way from Australia instead of its neighbors, I think that says all you need to know how "cheap" the electricity is from its neighbors.

    • @cerealport2726
      @cerealport2726 11 місяців тому

      @@exoticredtadpole2713 They mostly use gas to generate electricity now, imported from their neighbours. It's cheap, certainly cheaper than building an interconnecter many times longer than the longest ever built, and only able to deliver 2.2gigawatts.
      You're obviously of average to low intelligence, and certainly not an engineer or scientist if you think this project is viable financially, or logistically.

  • @Curious714
    @Curious714 3 роки тому

    Great video and informative. Thank you.

  • @sp1nnak3r
    @sp1nnak3r 3 роки тому

    Nice video, interesting topic, well researched and well presented. Subbed.

  • @JS-pl6zw
    @JS-pl6zw 3 роки тому +8

    knocked this out of the park man, well done

  • @raylopez99
    @raylopez99 3 роки тому +8

    A good book on laying underwater cable is by John Steele Gordon, "A Thread Across The Ocean" on the first laying of the Atlantic telegraph cable, about 170 years ago. Same problems with cable and deep seas.

  • @gagassurya19
    @gagassurya19 3 роки тому +3

    Indonesia: Hold my geothermal energy!

  • @00bikeboy
    @00bikeboy 3 роки тому +4

    Damn, that shark joke came outta nowhere and had me laughing out loud. Thanks for that 😃 and this excellent, informative video.

  • @jasmorris1286
    @jasmorris1286 3 роки тому +8

    Can't believe I just found this channel. Awesome topic

  • @x2ul725
    @x2ul725 3 роки тому +7

    omg that is a major project great update !

  • @shazmosushi
    @shazmosushi 3 роки тому +9

    If anybody is interested, Singapore is supposedly not well-suited to wind power, with low-to-intermittent wind speeds (2 meters per second) where commercial turbines supposedly operate at 4.5 meters per second. Also the waters around Singapore are busy shipping lanes, so there supposedly aren't actually that many places to put the wind turbines.

    • @itchyvet
      @itchyvet 3 роки тому

      From my memories, there are hundreds of islands around Singapore easily house wind turbines. But your right, not much wind there.

    • @huaiwei
      @huaiwei 3 роки тому +1

      @@itchyvet hundreds of islands? Whoops....I did not know Singapore purchased Indonesia?

    • @linmal2242
      @linmal2242 Рік тому

      Interesting.! I would have thought that wind would be plentiful !

  • @zainuddinbrahim4625
    @zainuddinbrahim4625 Рік тому

    Thank u for these good info

  • @JC-uz3ey
    @JC-uz3ey 3 роки тому +4

    Honestly, i am fully behind the idea of SG building its own nuclear plant. Let's just place it on one of the offshore islands near Indonesia :)

  • @user-ft5qk4nv4f
    @user-ft5qk4nv4f 2 роки тому +14

    I think a bigger problem with AC, especially underwater, is that the cable forms a capacitor with the surroundings and thus there is an AC current to ground. The longer the cable, the bigger the capacitance, the higher the loss.

  • @Redsson56
    @Redsson56 3 роки тому

    Very clearly and well explained.

  • @aking9999
    @aking9999 3 роки тому +2

    Great Idea !

  • @xinfuxia3809
    @xinfuxia3809 3 роки тому +6

    Australia is the Saudi Arabia of solar power resource. Greater than Amazon in reducing CO2 emission.

  • @davidpendleton4464
    @davidpendleton4464 3 роки тому +12

    The arbiter is definitely the best arbiter of arbitration.
    Also I'm really enjoying your videos

    • @MrMattumbo
      @MrMattumbo 3 роки тому

      He did help resolve a nasty legal battle between the Covenant and Humanity, I'd hire his firm anytime!

    • @davidpendleton4464
      @davidpendleton4464 3 роки тому +1

      @@MrMattumbo That's true but it required some Brute force

    • @MrMattumbo
      @MrMattumbo 3 роки тому

      @@davidpendleton4464 I like my arbitors to work for their money, can't have them get lazy or they're no better than lawyers ;)
      Bonus points when they decide your counterparty is a heretic and run an energy sword through their chest, best resolution ever!

    • @davidpendleton4464
      @davidpendleton4464 3 роки тому

      can't argue with that verdict

  • @John-eq8cu
    @John-eq8cu 2 роки тому

    excellent and informative, if low-tech video. Thank you.

  • @edthoreum7625
    @edthoreum7625 Рік тому

    TY!
    1:40 underwater cable line AC/DC
    2:10 how?
    5:00. Converter/inverter
    9:45 cables, exponential
    10:55 $$$

  • @ari8135
    @ari8135 3 роки тому +9

    Sounds unbelievable. The cable costs must be horrendous. Unless Singapore has thrown its lot in with the 5-Eyes and Canberra sees Singapore as its forward post.

    • @sampono1962
      @sampono1962 3 роки тому +1

      dont like this idea.....the cost of laying those submarines cables will be borned by consumers?

    • @szurketaltos2693
      @szurketaltos2693 3 роки тому +3

      @@sampono1962 turns out the costs of climate change will also be borne by consumers... Singapore has to reduce carbon emissions somehow. Not a lot of good options besides this and maybe setting up more partnerships with Malaysia/Indonesia.

    • @ritzmayj2672
      @ritzmayj2672 3 роки тому

      Singaporea dont needs australia 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @user5812
      @user5812 3 роки тому

      @@ritzmayj2672 Are you a geopolitical and resource management expert? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @WAITWHUT-wl2uj
      @WAITWHUT-wl2uj 3 роки тому +1

      Imagine singapore will be forever dependent on Australia for Electrical power sourcr

  • @Chu_Strums
    @Chu_Strums 3 роки тому +10

    Great video explaining from the technicalities to the economics of the project.
    Seeing that Indonesia is along fault lines, any idea how earthquakes might affect it?

    • @hwinangkoso
      @hwinangkoso 3 роки тому +2

      There is only one vault line that it passes through, that is the one south of timor. Other than that, i’m sure it’s quite safe

    • @linmal2242
      @linmal2242 Рік тому

      @@hwinangkoso Put a bit of slack in the cable to allow for ground movement. I'm sure they know about it and have worked it out.

  • @DarrenChen
    @DarrenChen Рік тому

    I liked that I learned about power transmission in this video

  • @betula2137
    @betula2137 Рік тому +2

    We're doing it!!!

  • @christiancramerhawaiirealt5690
    @christiancramerhawaiirealt5690 3 роки тому +17

    Dude why are your videos so good, jesus

  • @BaronVonQuiply
    @BaronVonQuiply Рік тому +3

    I stack my solar panels electrically to double the voltage and minimize transmission losses. Probably not making a huge difference even with my extra long coiled wire that needs to be trimmed to a reasonable length, but at least they kick on earlier and off later.

  • @Layingflat
    @Layingflat 3 роки тому

    Fantastic!

  • @Callyrace93
    @Callyrace93 3 роки тому

    I found your video very interesting with many things i didnt yet know, thank you :)
    as a note: there is some "not so loud but still hearable" background-noise when your mic is recording. but I`m not sure if its easily fixable still.

  • @markrowland1366
    @markrowland1366 Рік тому +3

    Importantly, Australia is politically stable and has a long history of supporting Singapore thought it's history. Importantly, support for Indonesia, has always been strong.

    • @hull4bal00
      @hull4bal00 Рік тому

      LoL

    • @TylerMarkRichardson
      @TylerMarkRichardson Рік тому +1

      @@hull4bal00 Australia is politically stable mostly
      Its more stable then a lot of countries

    • @hull4bal00
      @hull4bal00 Рік тому +2

      @@TylerMarkRichardson "Australia support for Indonesia has always been strong"
      That part make me laugh 😂

  • @djramm6810
    @djramm6810 3 роки тому +3

    You are a very funny person. I like you dry humor. oh and the topic was interesting also.

  • @MySpace662
    @MySpace662 Рік тому +2

    Windmills don't take up much space,
    they can even be installed offshore; each windmill can generate10000W of power

  • @favemediabureau
    @favemediabureau 3 роки тому +1

    Ambitious mega project

  • @aultraman
    @aultraman 3 роки тому +37

    Wow, that's pretty amazing. I wonder why it wasn't politically possible to have the solar/battery farm built in nearby Malaysia or even Indonesia?

    • @leehyunsong7001
      @leehyunsong7001 3 роки тому +45

      Australia vast desert is the perfect fit for solar farm, hot and dry help keep the maintenance low. And of course Australia is friendlier than muslim countries.

    • @TumbleDuck8
      @TumbleDuck8 3 роки тому +18

      @@iamgreat1234 lol

    • @qinby1182
      @qinby1182 3 роки тому +14

      _" possible to have the solar/battery farm built in nearby Malaysia or even Indonesia?"_
      I agree, it sound "complicated" and really Australia could use all "green energy" they can produce by themself and not export it, Australia have the highest CO2 emissions/capita in the world among "major" countries, even worse than the USA

    • @dbeysoyt
      @dbeysoyt 3 роки тому +6

      this project delivers 20% of Spore total demand. Malaysia and Indonesia could also have similar projects to contribute some share and spread the risk and enhance regional integration. great topic.

    • @diggerau698
      @diggerau698 3 роки тому +4

      @@iamgreat1234 no they just want our resources, only way they will colonize Australia is after they kill every single one of us and our allies and china knows it will be a cold day in hell before that happens, they have 2 chances, buckleys and none.

  • @jholotanbest2688
    @jholotanbest2688 3 роки тому +25

    This is a great project that just makes sense. I would imagen that the biggest problem tough is geopolitics.

    • @juniornutshell
      @juniornutshell 3 роки тому +1

      What aspect of Geopolitics? That would have already been sorted.

    • @marktan8074
      @marktan8074 3 роки тому +1

      @@juniornutshell Geopolitics as in Indonesia would be the problem... if ever there's one. Otherwise, the only other foreseeable problem is the ever present islamic terrorism which has been wrecking havoc worldwide.

    • @lightspeeder
      @lightspeeder 3 роки тому +2

      If Indonesia isn't happy with SG they can also "potong" Singapore's power supply, or make it difficult for maintenance operations to take place. Just like what mahatir threatened to do with the water supply in the past.

    • @MoonLiteNite
      @MoonLiteNite 3 роки тому +1

      @@juniornutshell Singapore's government is slightly racist to people nearby...... like imagine if in USA we took all mexicans and put them into government housing and wouldn't let them pick where they live. That level racism.
      The government has also murdered hundreds of people from other countries who do things such as have a plant on them. A few of them being from Australia. I am shocked Australia would agree to such a plan.

    • @ageofhedonism
      @ageofhedonism 3 роки тому +7

      @@MoonLiteNite I honestly have no idea where you're getting your sources from.
      In regards to the 'murdering', the death sentence has always been reserved solely for drug traffickers(large amounts). Those found in possession(minor quantities) are always sentenced to rehabilitation instead.
      Drug traffickers are aware of the risks involved but choose to do so regardless due to higher prices in Singapore

  • @Hamsters831
    @Hamsters831 3 роки тому +2

    Now that's an excellent pipe dream

  • @itchyvet
    @itchyvet 3 роки тому +2

    I lived in Singapore many year ago, during that time, many private residences were being built. If each of these private residences were fitted with a 10 kilowatt solar system feeding into the grid, they would not be in the dire straights with electricity they are. Moreover, going down that road, they are not reliant on anyone else and cannot be held to ransome. Reports I have read suggest power from this proposed solar farm in Australia would be used to manufacture hydrogen which can then be exported and used for varius uses.

    • @catprog
      @catprog 3 роки тому

      How many of those residences have 50sqm of suitable roof for the 10kw of solar?

  • @sparksmacoy
    @sparksmacoy 3 роки тому +46

    Australia is like a great big solar panel for South East Asia.

    • @rambablani846
      @rambablani846 3 роки тому

      There is China and other countries near to Singapore and they will also compete... Otherwise just convert hydrogen from Africa/asia to electricity..

    • @arminius6506
      @arminius6506 3 роки тому

      @@abrame8750 actually if you look even more closer than you'll know that there are a lot of other mines as well and they need to be developed.

    • @Fanta....
      @Fanta.... 3 роки тому +1

      @@arminius6506 I live in Western Australia, there's heaps of mines everywhere out in the country. nickel, bauxite, gold, lithium, iron... It's all being dug up and shipped overseas.

    • @huaiwei
      @huaiwei 3 роки тому

      Like which other viable alternative is there?

    • @roxyview
      @roxyview 3 роки тому

      TIME WE STOPPED THE BULLSHIT BEHIND WHY: The real reason behind this Singapore owns more of Australia than Australia www.crikey.com.au/2007/05/02/singapore-owns-more-of-australia-than-australia/
      Here’s a list of Australian commercial assets controlled by the Singapore Government:
      Optus: $10 billion
      Alinta energy assets: $4.3 billion
      Victorian electricity transmission monopoly: $2 billion
      Old Texas Utilities Australian portfolio: $5.5 billion
      Property: $2 billion
      Australand stake: $1 billion
      Total: $22.8 billion
      The Singaporeans prefer to play down the scale of their Australian assets, but this little country of 4 million people has left us for dead when it comes to national savings and global investments. It will be interesting to hear what Peter Costello and John Howard say when the question is put to them about the Government’s residual commercial assets being less than those held by Singapore.

  • @adamklam1
    @adamklam1 3 роки тому +23

    feels dangerous strategically/geopolitically to have a cable that can cut power from a significant portion of your country o_o`

    • @christianmarth9989
      @christianmarth9989 3 роки тому +18

      Wait till you learn that Singapore imports most of its water from its neighbour Malaysia

    • @MegaFirdaus1234
      @MegaFirdaus1234 3 роки тому +3

      @@christianmarth9989 well yeah , but they treat the water and funnel it back to malaysia .

    • @tedshen3085
      @tedshen3085 3 роки тому

      agreed , i wonder how cost effective will be

    • @huaiwei
      @huaiwei 3 роки тому

      @@christianmarth9989 50% from Malaysia, and declining with each passing year.

    • @easter8874
      @easter8874 3 роки тому

      @@MegaFirdaus1234 treat back? It’s only part of agreement to be fair you think malaysia cant treat our own water🤡

  • @robertlemoine3500
    @robertlemoine3500 Рік тому

    Thank you

  • @johnaugsburger6192
    @johnaugsburger6192 3 роки тому

    Thanks so much

  • @marx875
    @marx875 3 роки тому +4

    Indonesia has volcano mountains. Steam can be used to generate electricity.

    • @mulyadiwijaya3901
      @mulyadiwijaya3901 3 роки тому +1

      I am Indonesian, but didn't find much engineering, can you introduce me to geothermal engineering?

    • @Chobaca
      @Chobaca 3 роки тому

      What's your point?

  • @chrisvaiuso6010
    @chrisvaiuso6010 3 роки тому +3

    Indonesia has lots of geothermal electricity potential and it's way closer to Singapore than Australia. And geothermal runs constantly so no storage would be needed. Wouldn't that make more sense?

    • @fdhlmr
      @fdhlmr Рік тому +1

      Indonesia is the 2nd biggest producer of geothermal energy. First and foremost thing we do is use all that energy for ourselves (275 millon of us).

  • @vvolf6179
    @vvolf6179 3 роки тому

    well done!

  • @manitoublack
    @manitoublack 3 роки тому +2

    Sad facts.
    -At best you get 10h (in summer) of usable solar energy per day.
    -Battery storage is rubbish, only real storage is pumped hydro
    -A problem mining companies have come up against when installing solar farms is dust. Basically to have to be constantly cleaning the panels out there. With even small dust layers dropping output 15-20%.
    -Solar Cells are really only good (in a commercial sense for ~

    • @catprog
      @catprog 3 роки тому

      Only 5-6MW of nuclear power for 10billion dollars?
      25 years for solar panels.

  • @riaz8783
    @riaz8783 3 роки тому +5

    12:30 Basslink - It wasn't our fault!
    Hydro Tasmania: Were it so easy

    • @MarsOzzie
      @MarsOzzie 3 роки тому

      Make.you wonder that's why hydro Tasmania sent a guy to Sarawak for this 20 dams they plan to build. Seems easier to build a massive cable than using illegally run govenrment to build massive dams

  • @jagdeeshdhaliwal3848
    @jagdeeshdhaliwal3848 3 роки тому +6

    1 million VAC subsea is the way to go. It's been implemented onland from Moscow to Siberia in 1989. The challenge is subsea earthquake around Indonesia Island.
    If I was a Singaporen investor, I would invest in Kalimantan Indonesia instead.

    • @balakrishnansamikannu2255
      @balakrishnansamikannu2255 3 роки тому +2

      JD yours is the best suggestion so far.its cheaper,nearerncarries less risk.

    • @Foersom_
      @Foersom_ 3 роки тому +1

      Better HVDC. AC is not good for long underwear cables.

    • @AnalystPrime
      @AnalystPrime 3 роки тому +1

      Others have suggested that too, I suggest checking out the video at 14:13 and comparing the amount of sunlight Kalimantan receives compared to Australia, then Googling "Kalimantan weather report". To talk the investors out of building that undersea cable you have to convince them it is more expensive than building the solar farms five or more times bigger to produce close to same amount of energy.
      Earthquakes _might_ damage the cables, daily tropical storms _will_ cause problems for solar and wind power. Maybe they should look into geothermal and tidal energy instead.

    • @huaiwei
      @huaiwei 3 роки тому

      1. Subsea cables cross tectonic boundaries all over the world.
      2. And put the rainforests in Kalimantan at further risks when they are already in great danger? No way.

    • @AnalystPrime
      @AnalystPrime 3 роки тому +1

      @@huaiwei Oh yes, that too. Australian Outback can easily fit these huge solar farms and the local environment would probably thrive with the shade they give. On Kalimantan you not only have to cut down the forest, but because the tropical weather reduces the amount of available light you actually need to build at least two farms to match the one proposed for Australia, meaning more forest needs to be cleared...
      But it gets better, as just about only way to calm down the people who would protest this project is to promote how it produces clean energy... Oh, wait...
      So next you would have to cut down even more rainforest to build more solar farms so the locals can get clean solar power too.
      Also, cutting down rainforests tends to cause erosion so the solar farms might get washed away by floods or destroyed by a landslide.

  • @rayleeaustralia
    @rayleeaustralia 3 роки тому +1

    On another note. Yes Singapore would not have the land mass to implement solar panels but it is surrounded by water. Makes a lot more sense to develope tidal currents to develope power. The water is always moving

  • @forthepeople2272
    @forthepeople2272 Рік тому +10

    Considering that Australia is basically the prime source for uranium in the world, it would’ve made a lot more sense for Singapore to invest in small modular reactors instead.

    • @linmal2242
      @linmal2242 Рік тому +2

      Where are they? A bit like fusion power, pie-in-the-sky !

  • @pahatpahat9566
    @pahatpahat9566 3 роки тому +5

    A thumb up to explain the AC/DC transmission!

  • @creatoruser736
    @creatoruser736 3 роки тому +9

    That's a whole lot of work and money for only providing 20% of Singapore's power needs.

    • @shazmosushi
      @shazmosushi 3 роки тому +5

      Singapore has reportedly passed a law that no single source can provide more than 25% of Singapore's electricity. That spread your risk approach seems to be how they approach international relations. They try to make sure their economy and security is not overly dependent on either the United States or China. Whether they are getting the balance right can be debated, but that's their strategy.

    • @UltimateAlgorithm
      @UltimateAlgorithm 3 роки тому +3

      @@shazmosushi why not build a nuclear power plant instead of relying to power import?

    • @biketech60
      @biketech60 3 роки тому +4

      @@UltimateAlgorithm Traditionally , no one wants a nuclear power plant in their "backyard" and all of Singapore would be the backyard . Secondary issue is : Where do you store the nuclear waste , some of which will be deadly for ten thousand years ? That would most likely require an international agreement for not only a remote storage location, but the rights to shipping it by cargo ship . Cost to benefit ratio kicks in .

    • @electronresonator8882
      @electronresonator8882 3 роки тому

      way and way more money, if you think there's no politics friction between Indonesia and Singapore while the lands are neighbor for million of years, you gotta be kidding

    • @UltimateAlgorithm
      @UltimateAlgorithm 3 роки тому +1

      @@biketech60 I mean so little space so much power needed, density requirement kicks in. Solar and wind are some of the least dense power available. Nuclear on the other hand is very dense in terms of space to power generated ratio. For the waste, just drill deep down. Create an underground storage space 500 meters or more beneath the surface.

  • @tulsatrash
    @tulsatrash 2 роки тому

    Cool!

  • @StephenGillie
    @StephenGillie Рік тому

    The AC/DC Wars Shook Me All Night Long.

  • @douglasashby4349
    @douglasashby4349 3 роки тому +3

    Check out New Zealand cook straight lines. Deep and in high current speed area like Bass Straight

  • @guru47pi
    @guru47pi 3 роки тому +18

    How expensive are either 1) Singaporean electricity, and 2) Indonesian land to make this economical? You'd think it would be far easier to make a profit from supplying solar to Australia, or building solar plants in Indonesia (it's not cloudy all the time), or to sell the electricity to Java and save thousands of miles in undersea cables

    • @catprog
      @catprog 3 роки тому +4

      Indonesian monsoon. (Even the Darwin monsoon is a problem.)
      Means you need storage for a lot longer.

    • @catprog
      @catprog 3 роки тому +2

      How does selling power to Java solve the power problem in Singapore?

    • @juliane__
      @juliane__ 2 роки тому +1

      Exactly, coupled with aboundand Geothermal Energy in Indonesia there shouldn't be a problem for a shortend Sea Cable. Except, politics. Maybe Singapur doesn't like Indonesia OR it's a media stunt. Singapur and Australia are far more advertisable than Indonesia.

    • @dharmendra6214
      @dharmendra6214 2 роки тому

      @@juliane__ indonesia best friend singapore

    • @Alpha-kl4jo
      @Alpha-kl4jo Рік тому

      @@juliane__ Recently a Singapore public media published an anti/pessimistic Indonesia nuclear power source propaganda video. Instead of supporting their neighbor country or providing neutral insights from technology view, they just went stamped whole nuclear power technology as bad and all Indonesians as incompentent developing country people from politics and conservative environmentalist views. Little did they know, Indonesia is going to harness the safe thorium nuclear energy commercially by 2028 according to the current blue print. The nuclear power plant will be built in Bangka Belitung area which is really short to Singapore. In that video, they also worshiped solar energy as an only viable option. They neglected the geothermal potential completely.
      It's clear that they don't like us.
      Also the estimated electricity selling price from the thorium molten salt reactor is 0.7 cent/kWh and the current existing geothermal plant's is 6-9 cents/kWh. I wonder how cheap this Aussie solar electricity from the so-called Sun cable, not even counting the high sabotage risk on this long cable. The line must be very hard to break and very efficient to transport the electricity in 4500 km distance eh

  • @ashoks5317
    @ashoks5317 3 роки тому +1

    One Sun, One World One Grid. Excellent idea

    • @cerealport2726
      @cerealport2726 Рік тому

      Obviously not an Engineer, or at the very least, not a competent one then...?

  • @apidas
    @apidas 2 роки тому

    this is very interesting

  • @LutherYiew
    @LutherYiew 3 роки тому +21

    "A few rooftop solar panels on residential buildings. That is about it." - this statement is absurd. You certainly have not heard of Singapore's largest floating solar farm covering 45 football fields on our reservoir. It is also expected to reduce carbon emissions here by around 32 kilotonnes per year, the equivalent of removing 7,000 cars off Singapore's roads.

    • @chinchang5117
      @chinchang5117 3 роки тому +2

      Only remove 7000 cars off the road, u also dare to cry father cry mother!!!

    • @pinkipromise
      @pinkipromise 3 роки тому +1

      he is a foreigner. why dont you make videos instead and expect to know everything

    • @hdmccart6735
      @hdmccart6735 2 роки тому +2

      The one that only generates 60MW? Haha...

    • @brianmckenzie4315
      @brianmckenzie4315 Рік тому

      'football fields on a reservoir ' sounds intriguing......

  • @theenergizer248
    @theenergizer248 3 роки тому +3

    Makes more sense to go island hopping in Indonesia. Only need short stretches of submarine cable then.

    • @user5812
      @user5812 3 роки тому

      That would be a lot more complicated both physically and politically

    • @dzhiurgis
      @dzhiurgis 3 роки тому +1

      @@user5812 Still might be cheaper

  • @the.parks.of.no.return
    @the.parks.of.no.return Рік тому

    Good idea

  • @zestoslife
    @zestoslife Рік тому

    Appreciate 8:06 give the north islands power comes from south island hydro generation. Most people live in New Zealands North Island and most electricity comes from the South Island. So a HVDC cable connects the two islands.

  • @EyesOfByes
    @EyesOfByes 2 роки тому +4

    Hopefully they prepare they cable route with a massive amount of overhead for future powerdemand. Solarpower for all of southeast Asia FTW 🙂

    • @21stcenturyfossil7
      @21stcenturyfossil7 2 роки тому +1

      Plenty of room in the sea for more cables. Laying more cables, as needed, would devlop the benefit of redundancy.

    • @linmal2242
      @linmal2242 Рік тому

      @@21stcenturyfossil7 Maybe they should lay two at once while they have the ship and all the gear there doing it !

  • @gerrycooper56
    @gerrycooper56 3 роки тому +5

    They couldn’t afford the price of Australian electricity - most Australians can’t.

  • @vishnuv.rajagopal9532
    @vishnuv.rajagopal9532 3 роки тому +1

    I think it would be a better idea for Singapore to directly invest in off shore wind farms immediately as a stop gap arrangement and mobilize the support of Malaysia, Indonesia and other littoral states for the funding. The project is extraordinary and it would be a testimony for a future link for solar projects in sahara desert and its evacuation into continental Europe.

    • @kenoliver8913
      @kenoliver8913 Рік тому

      There's not enough wind near the equator - it's as simple as that.

  • @murin7185
    @murin7185 Рік тому

    Thanks

  • @billburr5881
    @billburr5881 3 роки тому +9

    WOuld it not be simpler to generate hydrogen, tranport it in tankers and burn that for power generation?

    • @ALTINSEA1
      @ALTINSEA1 2 роки тому

      it need to be continuous becuase i think the singapore will sell some of it to the malaysia and thailand.

    • @janeblogs324
      @janeblogs324 2 роки тому +1

      Generating hydrogen uses 4x the energy that you get back out.
      Cables flow 24/7. A 10% energy loss is acceptable.
      Ships need diesel, lots of it.

  • @cicadasbuzzbee
    @cicadasbuzzbee 3 роки тому +3

    This would be interesting on how to transmit electricity over such a long distance without losing too much power along the way.

    • @M_a_r_ke
      @M_a_r_ke 3 роки тому

      Easy increase volts

    • @Foersom_
      @Foersom_ 3 роки тому

      HVDC as explained in the video.

  • @chavdarnaidenov2661
    @chavdarnaidenov2661 3 роки тому +2

    There were similar ideas to bring solar energy from the Sahara to Europe. The distance is smaller. But there are settlements. In Australia, there may be Aborigens.

    • @usneome
      @usneome 2 роки тому

      Project of generating power in Africa and using HVDC cables to transmit it to Europe has been discarded as non-economical.
      The price of solar panels dropped so much that generating power using solar panels in Europe is cheaper than building expensive transmission cables.

    • @kenoliver8913
      @kenoliver8913 Рік тому

      I always understood the big barrier to Sahara power was political security. Who on earth would entrust their electricty supply to any North African or Middle Eastern government? This is the unspoken reason Singapore is looking to Australia rather than Indonesia or Malaysia, BTW.
      And yes, much of the Sun Cable project will have to be on, or pass through, aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander land (they are ethnically and culturally different peoples). These days you have to get agreement from them to do that, but judging by mining industry precedents that should be easy - basically promise decent health, education and job opportunities and take their advice on avoiding religious/cultural sacred sites.

  • @daveansell1970
    @daveansell1970 3 роки тому +1

    DC is even more advantageous under salt water because salt water conducts and a changing current will produce changing magnetic field which induce currents in the sea water. This costs energy.
    This is a reason why the cable across the English channel is DC even though it is relatively short. There are other advantages involving not having to synchronise the grids.

  • @Bobrogers99
    @Bobrogers99 3 роки тому +5

    Singapore could become very dependent on this distant power supply, and if the cable is damaged, it could take months and millions of dollars to repair.

    • @Bobrogers99
      @Bobrogers99 3 роки тому +1

      @@Bobspineable They can only get power from countries that have excess capacity and are willing to sell it to Singapore.

    • @roxyview
      @roxyview 3 роки тому +1

      Probably because there is a lot they don't want Australians to know: TIME WE STOPPED THE BULLSHIT BEHIND WHY: The real reason behind this Singapore owns more of Australia than Australia www.crikey.com.au/2007/05/02/singapore-owns-more-of-australia-than-australia/
      Here’s a list of Australian commercial assets controlled by the Singapore Government:
      Optus: $10 billion
      Alinta energy assets: $4.3 billion
      Victorian electricity transmission monopoly: $2 billion
      Old Texas Utilities Australian portfolio: $5.5 billion
      Property: $2 billion
      Australand stake: $1 billion
      Total: $22.8 billion
      The Singaporeans prefer to play down the scale of their Australian assets, but this little country of 4 million people has left us for dead when it comes to national savings and global investments. It will be interesting to hear what Peter Costello and John Howard say when the question is put to them about the Government’s residual commercial assets being less than those held by Singapore.

  • @StevieCooper
    @StevieCooper Рік тому +8

    It’s incredible that the Australian Government won’t pay/support similar for the Australians that live there, of which I am one.
    The consumption of Darwin would be very very small. It’s a tiny town.
    We have lots and lots of dry, sunny, hot land in the centre that no one but a few kangaroos 🦘 use. If Singapore can do it in my country, why can’t we!? Lol. Great videos!

    • @linmal2242
      @linmal2242 Рік тому +1

      It isn'nt Singapore doing it . Twiggy Forest and Gina Reinhart's money ! Don't know who proposed it, though.

    • @luka3174
      @luka3174 Рік тому

      We can't invest in infrastructure even in the most densely populated regions let alone the outback

  • @fabianfeilcke7220
    @fabianfeilcke7220 Рік тому +1

    The losses on AC transmission through cables are much higher than the calculation here. Due to the physical proximity of the conductors in a sea cable, they have a very high capacity. A 4000km cable would have around 0,4mF capacitance, resulting in a reactance of around 10Ohms at 50Hz. Its basically a dead short. There is basically nothing arriving at the other end.

  • @HappyfoxBiz
    @HappyfoxBiz 3 роки тому +2

    what makes me absolutely furious is not the fact that "foreigners are stealing our power" or "foreigners are stealing our land" it's not that at all
    *takes a deep breath*
    It's the fact that our PM is doing his absolute best to push for gas to be used in our country when it's at the highest price recorded and we are trying to phase out coal, a major pollutant and there's Singapore, a small (by land size) saying "yes, F that stool sample" and going with what Australia is really known for, a lot of sunshine in baron hospitable land that grows nothing but twiggy stuff.
    I want our country to tax them (fairly) and use that revenue along with bonds and grants to build our own and power our nation and probably New Zealand with this idea, if they are prepared to pipe in electricity from a country that is further to them than China then we should be prepared to have one state sacrifice vast land and get revenue from other states as we connect a resilient grid.
    I am embarrassed for my nation, this should have been something that we offered them AFTER WE BUILT THE THING!

  • @fromfareast3070
    @fromfareast3070 3 роки тому +11

    8:04 New Zealand Doesnt exist lol

  • @rickb3288
    @rickb3288 3 роки тому +8

    Japan is working on a similar project, but the electricity generated in Oz is first converted to Hydrogen, then compressed, and shipped to Japan. There the procedure is reversed to supply electricity.
    I wonder how Australian folks feel about the potential destruction of their homeland over these types of projects. A quote I learned years ago definitely applies to these types of projects: "The Law of Unintended Consequences."

    • @MsEverAfterings
      @MsEverAfterings 2 роки тому +1

      Not sure how that differs from mining sites, given these solar panels are built in very remote and desert areas; away from cities.

    • @3800S1
      @3800S1 2 роки тому +1

      @@MsEverAfterings Exactly, while not all of them are remote as the one in the video, most are in the middle of nowhere and are usually built on depleted and nonviable ex farming land for the ones somewhat near population. Nearly all the big ones are out in the middle of whoop whoop. My friend has worked on a number of these solar farms in Aus and most are literally nowhere on inhabitable land.

    • @linmal2242
      @linmal2242 Рік тому +1

      Have you ever been to Australia? Obviously not; if you had you would know that there is a whole lot of nothing outback with no people and thousands of square kilometers of semi-desert ! If anything, those solar panels will provide shade and moisture for a little more life to form/colonise the area !

  • @ferrykie7848
    @ferrykie7848 Рік тому +1

    Very smart idea u have malaysia and indonesia nearby and u pulling cable from Australia.... 😉

  • @tradfi950
    @tradfi950 2 роки тому +2

    i like how the asean map shows singapore as batam